When we read the wx report in the daily newspaper it was compiled by NOAA -- which is considered a national, public, VA - level military service for officers in NOAA. --> tAG
Would a degree in marine and Environmental science be adequate for a noaa enforcement position. I have gotten mixed responses. Also if I understand correctly officers go through a 19 week course. Is that correct?
I know of two people that didn’t have a degree in marine or environmental science. No they go through UPTP which is 13 weeks, boat school if you haven’t been to approve program.
NOAA should NEVER have a law enforcement division! There are far too many federal law enforcement agencies, now with nearly every federal agency having their own law enforcement agency! The U.S. Coast Guard is responsible for fisheries enforcement and inspections. NOAA is an awesome agency for many things they do, but they have no business in the law enforcement business!!!
@@jdog0341 Hey Justin, Yes, that is my point. Law enforcement by design under the constitution was, on purpose, primarily focused on state and local governments being responsible for this important function. The founding fathers were adamant about never having a federalized police force. Very limited federal government is the backbone theme of the constitution itself. Only specific, limited federal law enforcement was established for specialized reasons. The Revenue Cutter Service (precursor to the US Coast Guard) was established to enforce the USA’s tariffs, international commerce and shipping laws, etc. The US Marshals were established to assist county sheriff’s in apprehending outlaws committing crimes throughout various states, making them multi-state (federal) offenders. With few exceptions, this was the only limited federal law enforcement idealized by our forefathers. Then in the twentieth century came the formation of the FBI, and not long after, an entire host of federal law enforcement agencies, vastly expanding the federal governments role, although in direct opposition to the ideals set forth in our constitution. Now, there are well over five hundred (500) federal law enforcement agencies! Every single cabinet level department, in every single branch of the executive branch of government has numerous federal law enforcement agencies. This is simply crazy! Billions of dollars of our taxes going to fund endless bureaucracies, none of which answer to us, as do our local police chief’s and county sheriff’s! Anyway, this is my opinion and I appreciate your response!
@@conservativeokiecan’t forget about the US Postal Inspectors. Established under the crown and carried over. Franklin and company recognized the need for specialized enforcement even back then.
@@vermontmike9800 Yes. Again, very specialized enforcement only on matters affecting every state and in areas where no one state could effect such enforcement. I.e; maritime customs and revenue, the U.S. Mail, multi-state criminals and criminal enterprises and the Indian Country Police.
This basically is coast guard, game warden, customs combine
When we read the wx report in the daily newspaper it was compiled by NOAA -- which is considered a national, public, VA - level military service for officers in NOAA.
--> tAG
Would a degree in marine and Environmental science be adequate for a noaa enforcement position. I have gotten mixed responses. Also if I understand correctly officers go through a 19 week course. Is that correct?
I know of two people that didn’t have a degree in marine or environmental science. No they go through UPTP which is 13 weeks, boat school if you haven’t been to approve program.
Is NOAA LE the only ones with LE authority regarding humpback whales and the ESA / MMPA regarding humpbacks?
Pretty sure that USCG and CBP AMO have the same jurisdiction.
Without enforcement it’s just talking about change. Change isn’t wanted but needed. It has to be enforced.
Nooa kill using wheather
تتنًك.
NOAA should NEVER have a law enforcement division! There are far too many federal law enforcement agencies, now with nearly every federal agency having their own law enforcement agency! The U.S. Coast Guard is responsible for fisheries enforcement and inspections. NOAA is an awesome agency for many things they do, but they have no business in the law enforcement business!!!
Why? You could say that about every federal agencies that have a law enforcement component.
@@jdog0341 Hey Justin, Yes, that is my point. Law enforcement by design under the constitution was, on purpose, primarily focused on state and local governments being responsible for this important function. The founding fathers were adamant about never having a federalized police force. Very limited federal government is the backbone theme of the constitution itself. Only specific, limited federal law enforcement was established for specialized reasons. The Revenue Cutter Service (precursor to the US Coast Guard) was established to enforce the USA’s tariffs, international commerce and shipping laws, etc. The US Marshals were established to assist county sheriff’s in apprehending outlaws committing crimes throughout various states, making them multi-state (federal) offenders. With few exceptions, this was the only limited federal law enforcement idealized by our forefathers. Then in the twentieth century came the formation of the FBI, and not long after, an entire host of federal law enforcement agencies, vastly expanding the federal governments role, although in direct opposition to the ideals set forth in our constitution. Now, there are well over five hundred (500) federal law enforcement agencies! Every single cabinet level department, in every single branch of the executive branch of government has numerous federal law enforcement agencies. This is simply crazy! Billions of dollars of our taxes going to fund endless bureaucracies, none of which answer to us, as do our local police chief’s and county sheriff’s! Anyway, this is my opinion and I appreciate your response!
@@conservativeokiecan’t forget about the US Postal Inspectors. Established under the crown and carried over. Franklin and company recognized the need for specialized enforcement even back then.
@@vermontmike9800 Yes. Again, very specialized enforcement only on matters affecting every state and in areas where no one state could effect such enforcement. I.e; maritime customs and revenue, the U.S. Mail, multi-state criminals and criminal enterprises and the Indian Country Police.