Sugar Crashes Your Metabolism & Hormones? | What the Fitness | Biolayne
Вставка
- Опубліковано 12 чер 2024
- *Last week's video accidentally went up today but it has been corrected. Thanks for letting me know.
Get my research review REPS:
biolayne.com/REPS
Get my new nutrition coaching app, Carbon Diet Coach: onelink.to/9h4d62
My research based supplements: www.outworknutrition.com
Get my books on how to lose fat: www.biolaynestore.com
Take my online course "The Science of Nutrition": chfi.click/laynenorton_online
Get Custom Workouts by me for $12.99/month:
biolayne.com/workout-builder/
/ laynenorton
/ biolayne
/ biolayne
Jumped out of the icebath when I saw this notification
😂omg hahahha
😂😂😂
Lol good chirp
😂
Dude LMFAO 😂
Finally someone telling that sugar/carbs are not our enemy (provided that we not overdo it). I am sick of all experts who preach that keto (and intermittent fasting, in many cases) is the solution to all of our problems.
Consuming more calories than the body needs is actually the problem whether it comes from carbs or any other macronutrient. The more physically active you are, the better you can handle/metabolize the carbs.
All true.
100% agree.
Agreed. I fell for it for a long time.
Food isn't unhealthy, YOU are!
I think it's easier for the mind if we think the problem is external, it's not me, it's the sugar... If we accept it's actually the calories and not the sugar, well... shit, it's me then.
The good news is that taking the responsibility for the state of our body is also taking our power back. Nobody will come with a magic pill to save us
Okay if calories is all that matters, let me consume around 1500 calories worth of sugar everyday i.e 400 grams, 1700 calories from other foods to meet my daily 3200 calories. You are telling me that it wont disrupt my hormones, metabolism or inflammation levels at all ?
That’s exactly what he is saying . Make sure your required calories is 3200 . People tend to over exaggerate their expenditure and under estimate their consumption.
@libsonteresa5695 if layne says it ,it must be true .he's got a PhD n ev
Dammit, I came rushing over for a third ice bath vid . . .
Dude, I loved this, and we caught you on a good day I think it was the most nuanced argument you have given regarding this topic! Much Appreciated!
Ah man they fixed it! Lol good work Layne love the channel
yeah aha i noticed that too
This channel is a true gem! Thank you very much 👍
Thank you for the work you do.
Thanks for the education 💪🏽💪🏽
300gr of carbs here and prolly 75gr is sugar of that and i am as lean as can be. And healthy
That’s great, but I bet you’re working out (especially weight lifting). Most Americans probably aren’t exercising regularly. OBVIOUSLY…
As to your point about comparing eating too much calories vs eating too much sugar: Lots of people have an easier time to make excuses for eating too much sugar because it is "hidden" within their food. Thus they shift the blame onto big food and avoid any responsibility.
0:29 "you're gaining weight"
Let's turn on the broken record. how does it go again?
if you're not losing weight, you're not in a calorie deficit. the sugars not the culprit, it's everything else they're eating.
Dr. Kempner in the 1940s treated diabetics with his Rice Diet, and patients also could have sucrose. A few even had the majority of their daily calories from sucrose.
How can this be? Because they were on restricted calories.
While I'm not a Mike Mentzer fanatic i have used his training methods and I certainly agree with his nutrition advice, which is eat a well-balanced diet including carbs and fat. Who wants to limit carbs to 20 or 30 grams a day anyway. Some keto crazy will rebut this but how can an active person function with no carbs. And, who doesn't like a nice piece of pie once in a while.
For the algo. Lovin' all your content doc. 😊
Yep, every litttle comment helps.
Thanks for content! Do you have or planning to put out content in regards to Peptides? In particular the GH ones like CJC-1295/Ipamorelin?
as long as i get my workouts in regularly i burn right through sugar; actually drink bodyarmor with my caffeine pills pre-workout and i feel great. the age-old everything in moderation still works, just count your stuff and don't have 972g of sugar every day.
Exactly.. every other day is fine.
Jk
@@pattybaselines There you go, tne nutrition science LOL of the day :)
Can you please go over why Peter Attia talked about Semaglutide causing 2/3 loss of muscle and making people fatter. I didn't think incretin had any adverse effect on muscle
In 2 year semaglutide study they actually lost only like 1.1% body fat more than placebo because about 42% of their lost weight was lean body mass, placebo grup didn't lose any LBM
@@mateuszc70 This makes sense because most people with a poor lifestyle who don't work out if they simply cut their calories and don't increase and probably decrease their protein intake they will lose a larger % of LBM when they do diet.
I could find one study that says that ingestion of 75g of sugar lowers testosterone by 25%
"Abrupt decrease in serum testosterone levels after an oral glucose load in men: implications for screening for hypogonadism"
I eat enough sugar to think about how much sugar I’m eating in a daily basis and I still cant even gain bad weight at 36 years old. All be it, my meals are decently clean
Good information
My diet is about 50% sugar. I'll never stop.
I assume you are
@JimL Im 31, Ive been Peatarian now for 2 years. Its actually healthy if you do the diet as a whole, to make sure you're burning the sugar you put in your body. I get 50% carbohydrates mainly from natural sources, milk and fruit/fruit juice. 30% fat from Dairy and beef, highly saturated. And about 20% Protien about 1/2 to 1/3 is collagen. Its not from a junk, unless you count red bull lol.
@@RogueCylon see above
I am 44, reasonably active, lean athletic physique, lifting weights and basic calisthenics 2-3 times a week.
70% of my diet is carbs, and I have no issues like diabetes, cholesterol, heat issues, obesity, etc.
Reason? I don't overeat. I am not on any drastic surplus that my body can't handle. Surplus calories are real culprit for all such illnesses.
@farhan hussain I dont think I could go quite that extreme. But keeping cortisol low, and free fatty acids in the blood stream low, are critical to utilizing carbs. Fat screws up your mitochondrias ability to burn sugar, and preventing that is all about hormones as well as the % of fat in the diet.
Pretty sure sitting on the couch slows down your metabolism.
thank you.
I got a "heads up" [in a newsletter] that ZERO DHA actually made it into the brain when we take popular DHA supplements. Am I wasting my time and money buying fish oil/omega 3/dha supplements to replace fish (because I hate it)?
nice, finally the correct video :P
Every cell in your body runs on carbs. Maybe sugar isn't all that bad. If adding some sugar to a healthy dish encourages you to eat more healthy food, then yes it's great for you. My granola nut and seed cereal would absolutely suck without the brown added sugar. Therefore it's a net positive.
The worst part of added sugars is the empty calories.
There are very different kinds of sugar ranging from rather healthy to rather unhealthy (for different reasons). Afaik the unhealthiest sugar is fructose. But even fructose can be consumed in a way that isn't detrimental to your health if you don't eat (much) more than around 3 g per meal (which equals 6 g of sucrose) on a regular basis.
@@EnsoReloaded There is nothing unhealthy about fructose. 6 grams of fructose maximum on a daily basis? You just eliminated fruit from your diet, something which we know to be a healthy part of any diet and unhealthy to take out.
@@Melesniannon No, it's not a daily limit but a „dose limit“. That means how much fructose you eat at once is (much) more important than your total daily fructose intake. Also, the 6 g is the limit for _sucrose_ . For _fructose_ it's 3 g. However, that's actually a „low limit“. That means that if you won't eat more than that amount at once - independent of the context in which you eat/drink the fructose - there virtually won't be any detrimental impact caused by the fructose.
Now, if you e.g. eat fructose in the context of a full regular meal the limit is very likely (considerably) higher than 3/6 g.
Unfortunately I'm not aware of any research that has precise data about how much higher the limit is within different contexts. However, I'd assume that within a regular meal the limit probably could be at least doubled (6 g fructose or 12 g sucrose).
Also, most fruits contain a good amount of fiber which very likely increases the 3 g „low limit“. But even with the 3 g limit there are a lot of fruits you still can eat (if you won't eat too much at once).
@@EnsoReloaded Alright, I misread your sucrose for fructose, that's my bad but the point stands.
I'd invite you to look up the fructose content of an apple. Or an orange. Or a banana. Or a pear. A dose limit is an even worse limit because you've still eliminated fruit.
Where does your "low limit" even come from?
Maybe more importantly: given that it's apparently some limit for the isolated consumption of fructose (which happens... when?), and there's no data on how "bad" it is when consumed with other nutrients (even belonging to the same food such as a piece of fruit), what possible practical use is it?
Now yes!
Thanks 👍
Brilliant 👍👍👍💪
I was a Keto/fat adapted zilla to be honest but when I saw your first video 3 years ago my comman sense came running back to me slapped in my face and now I'm a normal guy who knows calorie matter thee Most then it's sources.
Thank You 😊
calories do matter what ever so called jason fung and dr ken berry say.I been there too on keto eating what i wanted and gained weight what i was near 0 carbs. I use fasting because it help with appetite control nothing magic about it keto i never tried it after that i realize what most idiots ketozeloits said was false
Better late than never. Congrats 👍👍
bravo for having ears to hear!
I had a Mountain Dew, two chewy bars before and a banana while riding the trainer for 2 hours today.
In terms of weight gain or most health outcomes that’s fine but it’s not the best approach for long term health. These foods cause higher free radicals production especially due to the fructose that results in more glycation end products than glucose. In the context of natural sugar in fruit that’s ok because it comes with antioxidants and compounds that combat the free radicals and oxidative stress.
@@knockingseeker The creation of free radicals is a natural part of cell metabolism, not raw sugar or fructose intake. If you are keto, you still produce a lot of free radicals.
The only accurate thing in your statement are antioxidants helping with getting rid of them. But at the end of the day, especially with cancer, you can iv antioxidants daily and still die of cancer.
There is way too much environmental pollution and radiation everywhere to make much a difference, and unless you can isolate the subjects in a lead container that is lined to prevent lead poisoning, and heavily scrutinize the quality food eaten, there are too many environmental factors that are going to skew the study and provide abstract results that end down the avenue of the pseudo science you just took a trip down.
2:52 And the best definition we have of “hyperpalatable” involves a combination of refined carbs, fat, and salt. Any one by itself isn’t that great.
The healthier longest living people I know and/or knew ate anything they wanted in moderation. They just ate less of what they liked. The more you restrict, the more you’re eventually going to want it and binge.
Spot on.
Large amount of carbohydrates (more than 100g/day) makes me weak and sleepy. It spikes my blood sugar ( I bought a cgm), like bad. Besides, when I start eating sugar, I hardly can restrain myself and I end up eating too much. So I've decided cut down on carbs, radically (
I sincerely hope you go on his podcast haha. Not necessarily to be a dick to him, but more so to expose his audience to the truth about some of the nonsense he promotes.
Love the channel. You da man.
Only legends know this was a ice bath video before
Havent keto diets been shown to increase test more than a high carb diet?
"For their given level of calorie expenditure, they consume too many calories"
Did you just call me fat and lazy bruh? I won't stand for this!!!
I think it only matters if you are having high volume of sugar in your blood
Consuming anything (including sugar) SPEEDS UP metabolism other things being equal, since digestion process is initiated.
The more sugar I eat the more sugar I want
That's not the sugar's problem. There's such a thing as "regulation" and "moderation". Just need to practice it.
It s not the sugars problem but it is the sugars fault.
@@Macgee826 it's not tye sugars fault. It's the brains reward system
@@neven8ivan which the sugar activates!
@@Macgee826 yes. As well as anything that gives you pleasure. Sex , drugs, video games ect.....
Hello biolayne✌
What do u think of doing a fullbody workout 6x-7x per week with the same amount of sets as in other splits? Since frequency and longer Regeneration time is easier and better avaiable this way. What do u think of fullbody in general.
Ty for your answer
biggest problem with this kind of routine is how do you know you are hitting your muscles hard enough? if you are able to train the same muscle group every single day you most likely aren't hitting it hard enough.
Now it is alright. Algo
Algo guy! 😎
Why would EATING FOOD raise HUNGER HORMONES?
What is your opinion on REHIT?
I did one last week. It felt too easy.
The metabolism thing is interesting. When I eat foods containing a lot of sugar, I get way more active, move my feet more, think more, get more nervous and such, which should mean that my metabolism actually increases, not decreases. Now with the hunger...I must say that I get hungrier whenever I eat white rice compared to something like potatoes, or I add something like a sugary sauce. That's definitely happening to me. Maybe it has less to do with blood sugar though, and more with dopamine and the food tasting better, resulting in being hungrier. And, thinking about it, it's diet advice that I've heard before.
True. Dopamine is a key player in our NEAT, I think from my own experimentation. Same with blood sugar. It matters, and affects us. But not through the bogus explanations the guys in the video use lol
different foods land differently on the satiety scale (generally). For example a baked potato is at the tip top, and generally very satisfying, but rice is further down the list. Various reasons for this I imagine, but I've noticed something similar between rice and potatoes. Oatmeal stuffs me, I feel gorged after a bowl of protein oats. Ain't it cool that when you consume carbs you can appreciate the different forms of them and choose the ones you prefer? #carbs
"get more nervous"
You might be having reactive hypoglycemia, which then leads to adrenaline secretion to prompt gluconeogenesis.
Most do not get reactive hypoglycemia. I don't, that depends on previous eating habits.
@@Individualati I mean I'm very certain that I've had hypoglycemia in the past after consuming high(er) simple carb foods to the point where I'd start sweating a lot, get real shaky and have a big craving for something sweet. That's been a while now though. Nervousness is still frequently there.
Will keep an eye on that. Thanks for taking the time.
@@ThomasAT86 Be aware that table sugar (sucrose) is only medium Glycemic Index, but is high on Insulin Index.
What's commonly said about simple vs complex carbs is not very meaningful, the amylase enzyme can chop up very long starch molecules into glucose easily. And the GI of white bread is only slightly higher than usual whole wheat bread - insoluble wheat bran doesn't affect much.
Grapes are high GI but prunes are much lower. That's counterintuitive but involves soluble fiber - like a gel.
Any chance of a vid on CreGAAtine
Hyman always looks sickly, worn down not healthy at all.
Is there a word for the ratio of satiety per calorie? If not, there should be. I’ve learned from Layne that this is the key. It’s too easy to overeat processed, hyper palatable food.
Satio (say-she-oh)? One issue with going for the satiety factor everytime, is you kinda end up with like a Greg Doucette diet, a lot of bulk per calorie which can be digestively challenging. I think a focus on nutrient density will help with Satiety, without constantly needing a full stomach.
@@CerebralFriction All of Greg's philosophies tend to end with the same conundrum that can be solved with his cookbook. The guy is a genius with his marketing. But that is about it.
I am curious, however, how many people who follow his diet for years end up with rectal issues such as fissures, hemorrhoids, and colitis. I do notice he also screams fiber, fiber, and fiber....huh. If I were a professional, I think giving that advice, only to cause THAT problem, to then offer solution to THAT problem is a really...um...shitty thing to do.
If there is, it wouldn't be a very practical word. Satiety for an actual person living a life, is more complex than measuring foods in isolation in a research setting. That's why every time Layne talks about it, he uses the phrase "tends to be", because satiety is in a large part about how you feel rather than what you consume. For example, flavor is a component of it, and that has everything to do with your personal taste.
If you actually listened to everything dr. Hyman said you wouldn't be able to eat a goddamn thing
This
Hence why he looks like a deranged corpse
For the algorithm!!
Holy crap, ice baths
Am I the only one who thinks that failure to account for nutrient density is a major shortcoming of the EBM?
What about fructose from processed foods and honey?🙏🏻🏋🏻
Fructose just becomes glucose once metabolized, so there would be no difference for fructose with respect to what Layne has said here.
Some people may have an issue consuming 5g to 50g extra fructose in a meal in relation to glucose. Luckily lots of carbs are naturally balanced glucose with fructose 1:1. If some is undigested it could feed bad bacteria.
Lol got it right this time 🎉
algo
Is that Dr. Buster Hymen ? 😅
👍
In a few hours nobody will remember that this was once a video about ice baths.
Something
Like a donut! The combination of sugar and fat is where people
Get into trouble with too many calories!
Al Gore busted my "Dr Mark Hymen" with his "Peter DeAmondis" while we watched this
Hyman is going to start requesting royalties from you.
👍👍👍
get carbon eat sugar train hard have fun
For the algorithm
Comment for the Algo
Here for Al Gore’s Rhythm.
Hello Layne, I have a question - is there any difference for human health when you eat organic meat like grass fed beef vs "normal" meat? And the same question for milk and eggs. I have noticed that bio-eggs are bigger, yolk is deeper yellow colour and they taste better. Is there any data on this? Thank you very much, I am a huge fan of your work! ❤
I think he made a video for this.
@@adityapasumamula7488 Thank you, I will search for it!
It’s not superior to regular animal produce for health. If you want to eat pasture raised produce for ethical reasons, then fine. But for your health, makes no difference wse
Can you please talk about the anti Calorie movement and what it's all about? And why do people get offended when you bring up Calories these days? Maybe it was Bart Kay who started this anti Calorie movement but it's weird
It wasn't Bart Kay. The "anti Calorie movement" as you put it is older than Bart Kay is. People have always sought to find different reasons for their weight gain that didn't turn out to be "overconsumption". To some extent that is also a good thing because we didn't stop trying to understand the human body and its metabolic systems, but the downside is you get people who latch on to any theory that suggests their weight is not their fault.
As for people getting offended, western cultures haven't treated their fat people so well. They're frequently the butt of jokes, and are portrayed as having additional negative characteristics which have become typical of "fat people". Fat people are mean. Fat people are socially awkward. Fat people are nerds. Fat people are dumb. Fat people are lazy. Fat people are slovenly. Fat guys leer at girls. Fat girls are sluts. Etc. etc..
Historically, gluttony is even one of the cardinal sins. It's no wonder people ended up trying to displace the responsibility for something they've been guilt-tripped about for decades if not *centuries*.
@@Melesniannon I don't know about everybody else but I never heard of the anti Calorie movement until Bart Kay talked about it and then the carnivores and ketos talked about it the whole thing about Calories not existing well people gain weight when they eat more people lose weight when they eat less so how does that explain Calories not existing??
@@daysoftheboo Well, the terminology matters for both subtopics, things get a little messy when it's vague what we're actually talking about.
The modern principe of the ketogenic diet involving periods of fasting is from the 1920s. Its recent rise in popularity, with something like "ketos" or a "keto crowd" existing, is clearly far more recent, about 20 years. On the other hand the principe of fasting and a ketogenic diet is ancient and has been around for all of human history. So depending on what you're exactly referring to, the answer to whether or not it's recent is "No", "probably" or "absolutely not".
Even if we take a more modern approach about it, a diet as well-known as the Atkins diet is still from the 1960s, which predates Bart Kay's year of birth as near as I can find it. Fun fact, it's not easy to actually find out when Bart Kay was born but near as I can find it, it was in 1970.
Of course Bart Kay is more about carnivore, and the carnivore diet is from the 19th century. Then there are proponents of it that argue it's far older, one might say, "ancestral".
Whether a ketogenic or carnivore diet is part of the "anti-calorie movement" is however an entirely different matter, as the dates I've mentioned didn't necessarily propose the introduction of the diet as an express anti-caloric agenda but rather for specific goals.
If you keep such things in mind it's easy to see how the water gets muddied in terms of "what started when". The simplest version is: since the Internet and especially social media became widely available and everyone got their own personal world-wide megaphone, and became able to reach each other quickly and easily, we start seeing these things as "movements".
Still makes it hard to say who started what but you're looking at the past 2-3 decades for the mass media stuff.
When it comes to the subtopic of calories not "existing", again, terminology matters. If you define existance as 'material', so only things of matter exist then no, energy doesn't technically exist and neither do calories. They're a construct.
Of course you should question whether or not that's important to what you're trying to do. A lot of things we use are constructs. Time, for example, is an immaterial construct but you won't hear Bart Kay deny its existence because that's not part of his agenda. What matters is whether they serve a useful function to what we're doing and in that area, time and calories have something in common: they are measurable by virtue of being a standardized unit and thus they absolutely do.
Does it matter that you can't "touch" a calorie, just like you can't "touch" an hour of time? Only if you want to swallow what Bart Kay is trying to sell you.
@@Melesniannon I don't know but both the carnivore and keto people and the zero fat very low fat people AKA raw till 4 Freelee style diet both claim you don't need to count calories as long as you eat the diet , the only time you have to count calories is when you're eating all three macros which I don't mind doing I want to eat all macros I don't want to eliminate one group or two groups just so I don't have to count calories then I'm going to miss out on nutrients, despite the claims of carbs not being essential they still contain vitamins and minerals
@@daysoftheboo I've been eating low-carb for over a decade, along with intermittent fasting, and at first I did not count calories because I greatly loathe that task. And yes, I lost weight, because I made adjustments to my eating patterns that caused me to consume less calories automatically, without counting them.
And then my weight loss stopped, because I'd achieved a new balance. If I want to lose weight now, still eating that low-carb diet, I need to count calories. When I do, and my adherance is good, I lose more weight. If I don't, I don't lose more weight.
You don't always need to count calories to lose weight, it's a tool that you may or may not use. The same goes for low-carb or carnivore diets and intermittent fasting, they are tools that you may or may not use.
However anyone who claims without any context or nuance that you can have unlimited succes without ever any need to adjust your tool use along the way, is trying to sell you something.
Man it must get tiring explaining the same things over, and over, and over, and over, and over. People want to blame their weight problems on things like splenda and completely ignore the fact that they overeat 6 days a week. "But this study SHOWED INVITRO SPLENDA CAUSES CANCER". Keep fighting the good fight...
Love this guy, he just pokes holes in everyone else’s arguments, are you funded by a product with sugar in it? “Eating right”. My friend wants to eat sugar because of you. Are you a health person or someone that says, “everything in moderation”? It’s like me saying there’s no evidence showing that this rock isn’t keeping tigers away. You just want views and likes or do you want a healthy society?
no he just points out that all of these "experts" and diet zealots are full of it. and most of these crazy claims they make are false.
He pokes holes in everybody else's argument so you think that makes him right?
@@Macgee826 no makes it click bait
@@ashtonsmith9682 maybe they're full of it, depends on who we're talking about,, or maybe we're progressing as a human race. We needed all those past fad diets to come to something that works for everyone. One person claiming to be an expert to put other experts down, just seems like a lot of nonsense. If the expert experiments on themselves, admit when wrong, that's the person I want on my team. Layne is making money off of ignorance.
Yes!
Mark… Hymen?😂
Lol@Hymen
Comment for the Algo Demon
Hyman doesn't look so good. I think he may need a bit of sugar.
FTA
Sugar increases insulin, a literal satiety hormone. I would love to know how many eating disorders Hyman is responsible for.
Chronically elevated insulin levels lead to insulin resistance. Eating sugar cause rapid blood glucose swings.
thats ghrelin and leptin ,
@@Android-Zen Deposition of fat in the muscles, liver and pancreas due to excess energy intake causes insulin resistance. High insulin is the *result* of insulin resistance, not its cause.
@@Android-Zen that's not true. That's only what the low carb quacks claim.
@@Android-Zen I'm not talking about chronically elevated insulin. I'm saying that eating sugar produces insulin which makes you feel full at a certain point, think kids feeling sick when they eat too many sweets.
Algoooorithm
Next you will say you got ripped for a show eating 50g of sugar a day.
It would help a bit (nah) if these guys actually looked healthy
If definitely lowers your metabolism, so much so that it ends up causing 'metabolic damage'
If only there was research that actually supported that.
It's the sugar in the hyper palatable foods that make them hyper palatable... ie drives people to over eat them, sugar is the problem here
Like chips and pizza and burgers?
1990s: FATS ARE BAD!
2020s: CARBS ARE BAD!
No nuance, fear mongering grifters and charlatans all
Al gore
Nice definition of lazy right there…
Because one of insulin's vital roles in the body relates to fat storage: it inhibits the breakdown of fat cells and stimulates the creation of body fat. That is, insulin tells the body to stop burning its fat stores and instead, absorb some of the fatty acids and glucose in the blood and turn them into more body fat.
And none of that matters if you're in a calorie deficit.
There is a great podcast by Peter Attia with Andy Galpin (whole series actually). Id suggest you take a listen. You will learn a lot. I know I did.
Insulin is helping the glucose, proteins, and electrolytes get in the cells too. It’s an anabolic signal.
🤡🤡🤡
Mice are of primates . They do experiments on mice because they can get away with it . Mice studies shouldn’t have any relevance to humans .
*not
It’s all about inflammatory dialogue to get clicks. Hyman isn’t looking on the top side of his game in this particular video. I certainly hope he’s not getting sick
So, I think Dr. H is a little too "woo woo" and unscientific. That said, I was so addicted to sugar and it was causing me to be overweight, inflamed, achey and feel like crap. So I had to end that relationship to get back to my fit, healthy motivated self. Sugar really is the devil...to me. 😂
im so sick of all this "cut out sugar for 30 days and you suddenly have 10 millions on your bankaccount" BS...
i tried all diets in the past 10 years, did keto, carnivore, whatever...
the best diet is still a balanced one on which you learn to eat everything you want in moderate amounts.. best thing for me is to eat clean during the week, lifting heavy weights, go for walks every day and on the weekends, i have cheat meals with friends, sometimes pizza, burger, icecream... this does nothing to my body, i can even lose fat..
Even the format of the video, super short attention span turbo edited, guy sitting there with the "WOW that is so insane!" look on his face, and the dramatic ass music in the background. Stop it, get some help.
Hes beyond help😂
The video was cold, thanks layne 🧊 🥶
For the algorithm
Al gore