The case that made me mad was the one where the two friends that have known each other for 8 years it is the defendant's answer is what burned me. Her defense was: "Well, she makes more money than I do as a bartender. So, I don't need to pay her back for she makes more money." That is the worst reason, and it shows her character of how she sees HER FRIEND. Basically, she is saying "The only reason I thought of her as a "friend" is because she makes more money than I do. So, I can mooch off of her and I never have to worry about paying her back. EVER." Does she not know how much money a bartender makes? If this is a fancy serving multimillionaires or even a millionaire night club, there is no way she is making that much of a difference in making that money she "loaned" back. I hate it when "good friends" are destroyed by one person's immoral reasoning. Whether it was just to used them or such.
The case that made me mad was the one where the two friends that have known each other for 8 years it is the defendant's answer is what burned me. Her defense was:
"Well, she makes more money than I do as a bartender. So, I don't need to pay her back for she makes more money."
That is the worst reason, and it shows her character of how she sees HER FRIEND. Basically, she is saying "The only reason I thought of her as a "friend" is because she makes more money than I do. So, I can mooch off of her and I never have to worry about paying her back. EVER."
Does she not know how much money a bartender makes? If this is a fancy serving multimillionaires or even a millionaire night club, there is no way she is making that much of a difference in making that money she "loaned" back. I hate it when "good friends" are destroyed by one person's immoral reasoning. Whether it was just to used them or such.
Wow this judge is a complete clown. Is this stuff real?