@@aewon2085 Realistically, the US Military doesn't deal in fair fights. Several regiments of Russian bombers would be met by half a dozen F-22s at least, a dozen F-35s, two dozen F-16s and half a dozen B1Bs, and if they're dumb enough to fly anywhere near a US Carrier Group they'd have to deal with dozens of F-18s.
@@GroggyGrognard Imagine if you could TWS from a C-130 with a rapid dragon sled (or whatever its called) stuffed full fox 3's. "Push the fire everything button.... Nerd nerd nerd nerd." 😂
When you look at your radar and see a bomber left at each end..."That's gonna be a tough spare." You'd think there would be a drag and select "destroy everything in this square" kind of option for the targeting system and the airplane would fire the missiles in the most efficient manner.
Did you know there was a twenty two year period in history where a samurai could have sent a fax to Abraham Lincoln. Check it out. Reality is sometimes crazier than we expect.
I wouldn't want these kind of videos every time, but it's really fun to throw realism out the door and just do something awesome! Appreciate every video you guys put out!
@@grimreapers can't imagine Russia would be stupid enough to send bombers without escorts. But gotta appeal to the patriotic pride of the Americans and make it a massively unfair fight so that they win no trouble, further fueling their ego's since they're all dumb enough to believe this represents real life.
That would be a good idea! Fire the 174s from far away, drop tanks and pilons, go stealthy and sneek in for what ever is left. The radar contact disappearing would throw the enemy for a loop
@@Davros-vi4qg I feel like all they would know is area of last known radar contact. The F22 could drop to the deck and come in from a flank without ever being seen. Ofcorse given the terrain to do so. Kinda hard to hide over open water or flat desert!
Apologies if this has been answered elsewhere, but why is the radar in the F-22 having to visibly scan back and forth to update target tracks rather slowly? Being an AESA radar, shouldn't it be able to update much much faster, and be able to keep tracks on individual targets without re-scanning that entire section of sky?
If you can program that into DCS, please do. Also, the real F22 probably don't have to lock each target individually and launch them like how it is in the vid. Just hit enter and it should just go to the next target (in reality or you need a WSO). But then again, it's easier said than to actually code it up and put it in DCS
1. This sim is not accurate to real life, no matter what the Maverick-wannabes want to believe. 2. The F-22 is not part of the game, it's a fan mod that does not represent the real thing.
Loving the content, only time I'm happy to sit down and watch some missile cam footage for two hours, just like watching a movie. I have played Battlefield 3 and 4 now play Rust on PC. Had seen Arma but this DCS is something I have discovered on your channel. This is great stuff!
@@onefansview9874 ha ha😐 Those are just a few updates/upgrade of what The Raptors are actually receiving, there's more not including that I'm aware of racing stripes and flammer decals!👌👍
Good thing Cap is not a real life Air Force pilot... just think of the cost to taxpayers having to replace canopy glass & hardware after every sortie! 🤣
Silly question: If we can refuel mid-air, why can't we re-arm missiles? Think about it: you create a drone missile truck with the appropriate robot arms to fly under the planes and insert / affix the missiles accordingly. Precision flying? Sure. Invent some tech? Probably. Re-design some pylons? Maybe.
Hi folks, FYI the fuel flow rate from the tanker is dependant upon how many tanks the receiver is filling simultaneously, more open fuel valves = more flow....."simples".....( been there, done that)
Hello. I have watched several of your videos. You guys have done a great job, and I have re-watched multiple videos. That being said, I have 1 request. Would you entertain the idea of doing the "Fastest Interceptor Aircraft OF ALL TIME" one more time? I ask because I feel there were a few planes that were left out that could have made the race even more interesting. The planes in my request are as follows: [1950s] F-100 & MiG-19 | [1960s] F-105, F-4, & YF-12/SR-71 | [1970s] AJS37, F-14, MiG-25, & Tornado IDS | [1980s] F-15C, F-16C, MiG-31, & Su-27 | [2000s] EF2000, F-22, & Su-35. I think the F-100 should be included from the 1950s because it was catching up the MiG-19 in the 1950s race, and it would provide a challenge for the MiG-19. In addition, I think the F-4 should be included as it was the performance aircraft of its generation. Lastly, you even said in your video "Fastest Interceptor Aircraft OF ALL TIME" that the F-14 was to be included, but it wasn't.
Heh!...: Screwed The Pooch..A term I learned in Air Frame & Power Plant Mechanic School....Meaning, yea, I Forked Up and need to ride it out as best I can else die!...
Automatic thumb's up! Because I was naughty, skipped the blah, straight into the sexy combat! Did I just see Cap do a thing, flawlessly? Right up until he did a thing. Oh GR you treat us so fine...
Could you guys do one battle, without ridiculous mods, and stupidly crafted scenarios. I just want a 4v4 of your group for once. Lets see how you all fly so we can actually learn something
@@grimreapers And I'd watch more of your videos if you did literally anything other than American or Russian jets. Not all your valued viewers are Patriotic pinheads that want to literally have sex with the F-22. it's overhyped and has been bitch slapped by "inferior" aircraft all the time.
Note: PrSM Increment 2 is different than the increment one in service right now. It offers imporvements like the ability to hit moving targets through a new multi-mode seeker (specifically ships), extends the range up to 1000km, and increases the speed even past the hypersonic impact velocity that already comes with increment 1.
Hell you guys put on the internet that people have Hypersonic missiles unless you're talking about EXO atmospheric because that's the only time of missiles hypersonic
Nice work, Cap. Thanks for these videos. I remember when I first saw your channel I wondered why there isnt more youtube creators doing it but DCS seems like a bitch to work with.
Sshhh, you mustn't disturb their fanboy delusions with such crass things as mentioning realism. You might as well turn it around by making 12 of the bombers into the never completed fighter version and slap a modern MiG-31 radar on it along with a bundle of R-37Ms. And whoops, no F-22s left. Just as absurd and silly.
@killerblingxbl We, the players , do you see someone even thinking about working on an f35 with approximate parameters in DCS like indiafoxtecho has done in MCFS? Of course you can only go thhis far in mcfs , but now they are creating external c++ radar simulation modules and extra mission systems etc.... , there is a big market for an f35 in DCs, but no one dares try to recreate it. I like the f35 very much.
B-1B missile truck could have done the same thing, at a much cheaper cost per flight hour.
Enjoy: ua-cam.com/video/gbHV_E5tHRI/v-deo.html
Not about efficiency, it’s about sending a message
@@aewon2085 Realistically, the US Military doesn't deal in fair fights. Several regiments of Russian bombers would be met by half a dozen F-22s at least, a dozen F-35s, two dozen F-16s and half a dozen B1Bs, and if they're dumb enough to fly anywhere near a US Carrier Group they'd have to deal with dozens of F-18s.
@aewon2085 i mean ... pretty fucking clear message, 1 plane takes out your whole bomber fleet 😂
@@s4ss.m8 4 planes, not 1
"How many AMRAAMs can you put on that tanker?" " Lots of AMRAAMs." " Lots of AMRAAMS? Come on Dart, get to work." PMSL!
Everything flying is a missile truck if you're brave enough?
literally read this when they said it
@@GroggyGrognard Imagine if you could TWS from a C-130 with a rapid dragon sled (or whatever its called) stuffed full fox 3's. "Push the fire everything button.... Nerd nerd nerd nerd." 😂
@@BlueArsedGibbon I made a similar proposal with The Big Sticks - it didn't go over well on here. :)
Imagine a b52 with aim120d/aim174 in the bay and pylons on the wings.
When you look at your radar and see a bomber left at each end..."That's gonna be a tough spare." You'd think there would be a drag and select "destroy everything in this square" kind of option for the targeting system and the airplane would fire the missiles in the most efficient manner.
In America, President Abraham Lincoln pass a law that said you can not put anything on the internet that is not true. (I read this on the internet.)
The most confusing, wrong, and retarded comment ive read today.
Did you know there was a twenty two year period in history where a samurai could have sent a fax to Abraham Lincoln.
Check it out.
Reality is sometimes crazier than we expect.
This reminded me of 8th grade history when wiki just came out and anyone could edit 3 kids had Abe a raging drunk gay guy lol
Imagine being some fisherman out on the water and all of a sudden some sky jockey’s celebratory rounds start strafing you.
Hey cap glad that you did the beast mode raptor with external missiles, hope you're doing well
thx
Good Luck my man.
🇨🇦 Vet
“Mine is firing backwards at me”
@grimreapers:
“Yeah, its a Backfire”
I wouldn't want these kind of videos every time, but it's really fun to throw realism out the door and just do something awesome! Appreciate every video you guys put out!
shhhh don't tell the Americans this is unrealistic, their patriotic little pea brains can't handle it.
Sounds like you just destroyed at least twice the number of TU22-M3 in service :D
Yup!
@@grimreapers can't imagine Russia would be stupid enough to send bombers without escorts. But gotta appeal to the patriotic pride of the Americans and make it a massively unfair fight so that they win no trouble, further fueling their ego's since they're all dumb enough to believe this represents real life.
Who wants to tell Pootin the bad news?
Halfway to the tanker, Cap: Are there missiles on my wings?
Couldn't see them!
F-22E Strike Raptor
Classic GR mission ending
@3:20 "Do you think someone would do that: just go on the internet and lie?" - Arbraham Lincoln
most things told about the F-22 are lies.... we call that "propaganda".
First, there was the F-22 Raptor. Then the Super Raptor. Will there one day be a Super-Duper Raptor?
"I'm Super! Thanks for asking!"
88x bombers and 4x Raptors…that’s 22x bombers for each F-22 Raptor
oh hey you know basic division.... well done sport.
That would be a good idea! Fire the 174s from far away, drop tanks and pilons, go stealthy and sneek in for what ever is left. The radar contact disappearing would throw the enemy for a loop
However they would know your approx bearing, fuel load, and burn rate, so there’s o lt a given ‘cone’ u can be in.
@@Davros-vi4qg I feel like all they would know is area of last known radar contact. The F22 could drop to the deck and come in from a flank without ever being seen. Ofcorse given the terrain to do so. Kinda hard to hide over open water or flat desert!
These battles keep getting crazier
a thing happened at the end....Good one Cap
That may have been too close.
Apologies if this has been answered elsewhere, but why is the radar in the F-22 having to visibly scan back and forth to update target tracks rather slowly? Being an AESA radar, shouldn't it be able to update much much faster, and be able to keep tracks on individual targets without re-scanning that entire section of sky?
Because DCS is a game not a sim lol
The reall F22 can track 10 targets simulatiusly. DCS modell dont understand how modern radar works.
If you can program that into DCS, please do. Also, the real F22 probably don't have to lock each target individually and launch them like how it is in the vid. Just hit enter and it should just go to the next target (in reality or you need a WSO). But then again, it's easier said than to actually code it up and put it in DCS
In DCS it has a buffed mechanical radar from an F-15C.
1. This sim is not accurate to real life, no matter what the Maverick-wannabes want to believe.
2. The F-22 is not part of the game, it's a fan mod that does not represent the real thing.
Loving the content, only time I'm happy to sit down and watch some missile cam footage for two hours, just like watching a movie. I have played Battlefield 3 and 4 now play Rust on PC. Had seen Arma but this DCS is something I have discovered on your channel. This is great stuff!
Thanks Cap, love the mission
TODO: take gaffer tape next time.
Thanks Grim Reapers!
Well, at least you gummed up Dark's plane...
Alex Hawlings did a great video on the Super Raptor you guys should check out.
Yup saw it.
“Imagine how many amraam’s you could fit on the tanker” 😂😂😂 made me laugh
Pretty impressive mission! Keep up the awesome work!
Super-Cruise is more fuel efficient than running the AB's....but still consumes a LOT more fuel than high subsonic.
Valued silliness is valued.
My exact reaction after hearing you describe this “super raptor:” …WHAT?!
It really needs an HMD at least lol and you could do the stealth tanks/pylons and chrome/metallic coating!👍
Don’t forget racing stripes and flame decals!🤣
@@onefansview9874 ha ha😐 Those are just a few updates/upgrade of what The Raptors are actually receiving, there's more not including that I'm aware of racing stripes and flammer decals!👌👍
And GR strikes again!
Good thing Cap is not a real life Air Force pilot... just think of the cost to taxpayers having to replace canopy glass & hardware after every sortie! 🤣
So that's how baby raptors are made.
Should have used the f-15ex it can actually carry 22 aa missiles
Regarding the slight fuel leak. If you don't try to plug the leak you'll never have the chance to succeed.
Correct attitude to life.
Silly question: If we can refuel mid-air, why can't we re-arm missiles? Think about it: you create a drone missile truck with the appropriate robot arms to fly under the planes and insert / affix the missiles accordingly. Precision flying? Sure. Invent some tech? Probably. Re-design some pylons? Maybe.
Thanks cap
This modification creates a limited number of excessively expensive f15ex competitors while tying up a unique asset.
Went from DCS to Ace Combat real quick
I hope you are well. Best wishes.
So many shoots and not a single dang, must be northern aircraft.
0:05 thats a sound i haven't heard in fucking years! 😂
i feel touched when that one guy speaks
Are they going to use the new variable bypass and compression engime on the super raptors?
You guys so GR’d that mission!!😂😂😂😂😂
Thank you!
Hi folks, FYI the fuel flow rate from the tanker is dependant upon how many tanks the receiver is filling simultaneously, more open fuel valves = more flow....."simples".....( been there, done that)
Thanks, interesting.
Is it Baum Guam or Bomb Guomb?
0:01 Phone call / Text message coming through. Hear the static interference.
I'm guessing there isn't an underwing weapons pod modelled, yet. ;)
Nope
Wasn’t there a proof of concept that put 4 extra missiles in an LO designed casket underneath the wings? And it never got out of computer model?
I hope you are doing well also, Cap
Which unrealistic F-22 fan mod did you guys use?
Do you have link to latest Raptor Mod? After I updated latest DCS, my Raptor mod is no longer flyable
Why wouldn't you take a center line stealth tank?
What joystick do u use?
10 Chinese J-10s against 80 American C-130s.
It would be interesting to see a B52 loaded with long range air to air missles, maybe as backup to the fighters.
Read Dale Brown’s ‘Flight of the Old Dog’, if you can find a copy.
is there a grim reapers server ?
Yes, easy to find.
My gear still wont go up on the f-22, anything I can try??
I'm having all sorts of problems with it also, not sure why yet.
@@grimreapers Ok, thanks!
So now do it with the F15 ex with a few bears as well...
Radio be like:
Fox 3
Fox 3
Fox 3
Fox 3
Fox 3
Fox 3
Fox 3
Fox 3
If they dodge the barrage of AA bullets yes they can shoot it down
Hello. I have watched several of your videos. You guys have done a great job, and I have re-watched multiple videos.
That being said, I have 1 request. Would you entertain the idea of doing the "Fastest Interceptor Aircraft OF ALL TIME" one more time? I ask because I feel there were a few planes that were left out that could have made the race even more interesting.
The planes in my request are as follows: [1950s] F-100 & MiG-19 | [1960s] F-105, F-4, & YF-12/SR-71 | [1970s] AJS37, F-14, MiG-25, & Tornado IDS | [1980s] F-15C, F-16C, MiG-31, & Su-27 | [2000s] EF2000, F-22, & Su-35.
I think the F-100 should be included from the 1950s because it was catching up the MiG-19 in the 1950s race, and it would provide a challenge for the MiG-19. In addition, I think the F-4 should be included as it was the performance aircraft of its generation. Lastly, you even said in your video "Fastest Interceptor Aircraft OF ALL TIME" that the F-14 was to be included, but it wasn't.
do i need dlc to get mods to work
most mods like this tend to run on Flaming Cliffs planes. I believe it's the f-15c u need for at least one of the F-22 mods.
I would think that loadout would increase its radar cross-section
It would as discussed in the briefing… stop skipping the briefings 🤨😁🤣
@@Davros-vi4qg Ack! I'll take my demerit 🤣
I pulled up the vid for later because I was working at the time
23:02 Hawk Tuah!
What gaming laptop would you recommend for dcs. I am looking for anything below 1100 dollars
Heh!...: Screwed The Pooch..A term I learned in Air Frame & Power Plant Mechanic School....Meaning, yea, I Forked Up and need to ride it out as best I can else die!...
Automatic thumb's up!
Because I was naughty, skipped the blah, straight into the sexy combat!
Did I just see Cap do a thing, flawlessly?
Right up until he did a thing. Oh GR you treat us so fine...
I believe a thing happened. Again.
Great fun Guys, love watching the videos Cap.
Definitely put a big dent in Russia's strategic assets.
88 bombers and zero escorts.
Hello valued vid makers
Could you guys do one battle, without ridiculous mods, and stupidly crafted scenarios. I just want a 4v4 of your group for once. Lets see how you all fly so we can actually learn something
If you guys would be willing to watch anything other that F-22, F-35 or Su-57 believe me I would LOVE to make it...
@@grimreapers And I'd watch more of your videos if you did literally anything other than American or Russian jets. Not all your valued viewers are Patriotic pinheads that want to literally have sex with the F-22. it's overhyped and has been bitch slapped by "inferior" aircraft all the time.
Hey cap, can you do PrSM Increment 2 vs Chinese CSG?
Note: PrSM Increment 2 is different than the increment one in service right now. It offers imporvements like the ability to hit moving targets through a new multi-mode seeker (specifically ships), extends the range up to 1000km, and increases the speed even past the hypersonic impact velocity that already comes with increment 1.
Knocking the wing off did stop the leak...... A bit unconventional, but it did solve the problem.
Why not F-15EX carrying 12 AIM-174B / SM-6 MISSILES?
Not possible, way too big. I would say maximum 6 SM-6 missiles
@@sujitbala1492 yeah, just adding extra pylons
@@Ark_OneHell Even then. The weight of SM-6 missiles is simply too much. Speculating though, only F/A-18 can carry SM-6 for now.
@@sujitbala1492 To be fair he never said ONE F-15EX. It can very well be a flights of 3 or 4
Because F-22 Raptor >> F-15EX
This but with the f15ex fully loaded.
Hell you guys put on the internet that people have Hypersonic missiles unless you're talking about EXO atmospheric because that's the only time of missiles hypersonic
Relax.. Russians don’t have 88 bombers😂
They do, buy only 34 fly. They store them in dirty cold places. Mechanicals just break down and freeze.
88 working bombers? Maybe not. 88 rusted hulks rotting away in the open snow in Siberia? Probably.
and they wouldn't send bombers without escorts either, but gotta make it easy for the Raptor so the yank fanboys can touch themselves.
Nice work, Cap. Thanks for these videos. I remember when I first saw your channel I wondered why there isnt more youtube creators doing it but DCS seems like a bitch to work with.
Yes, yes it is.
Nice vid but the mission doesn't make any sense. russian cruise missiles have a range of 5000+ km
And, demonetized...
Darks voice is like nails scraping down a blackboard, get the dude to either stop smoking or gargle some honey and lemon before he talks.
So bad...
The Russian bombers must not have had jammers or countermeasures or a tailgun.
Sshhh, you mustn't disturb their fanboy delusions with such crass things as mentioning realism.
You might as well turn it around by making 12 of the bombers into the never completed fighter version and slap a modern MiG-31 radar on it along with a bundle of R-37Ms.
And whoops, no F-22s left.
Just as absurd and silly.
or, ya know..... escorts.
2:53 probably the worse vocal fry I’ve ever heard.
Seriously. I had to turn down my headphones.
Let's say the americans had MIG 31s.
The Americans had MIG 31s.
It's close enough, but they did in fact have a Mig-25.
Oh pls Lordy no. They’d only use it for target practice. Just like rl F15s did with rl MiG25s
Too bad we will never get the f35 at this rate , atleast the one in microsoft flight sim is half decent and getting better.
who is 'we'
@killerblingxbl We, the players , do you see someone even thinking about working on an f35 with approximate parameters in DCS like indiafoxtecho has done in MCFS? Of course you can only go thhis far in mcfs , but now they are creating external c++ radar simulation modules and extra mission systems etc.... , there is a big market for an f35 in DCs, but no one dares try to recreate it. I like the f35 very much.
DCS only adds aircraft they can model completely. That means the plane needs to be mostly declassified.
@@tbe0116 25 more years by the way the f35 program is shaping.
The kid didn't skip arm and shoulder day. #habituallinecrosser
Ok cap you have to fill us in on your ‘bucket list ‘ comment I’m sure I’m not the only one who’s worried and hoping all is well