GM 6.5 V8 Diesel Rotrex Supercharged
Вставка
- Опубліковано 20 жов 2024
- GM 6.5 V8 diesel, build in the Netherlands.
Fitted with own special brackets to fit a Rotrex supercharger on the front of a 6.2 or 6.5 diesel.
Depending on customer preferences, a various amount of different Rotrex supercharger setups are available to get to the preferred amount of bhp.
In this case the engine produces 215bhp and 510Nm torque.
The engine will be placed in my M1028A1 CUCV, connected to a 4l80e/NP205.
Hi, very nice, just subbed. I drive Y61 Patrol with 300hp Peninsular conversion. Which exactly Rotrex model is installed in this case? BR
What is the size /Modell of the Rotrex ?
so what the digits on that then eh ?
what is that gold cansiter looking thing i keep seeing on these engines?
It's called a CDR valve. It acts like a PCV on a gas engine but works a bit differently. You would not be able to just swap it out with a PCV valve.
@@sagacious11 thank u
Sweet less complicated then aa Turbo more torque off idle all the way to the top
Nice engine!! When will we see it in action in the lifted K30??
It will take a couple of weeks before it will be in the K30. And a couple more before it drives again!
Is that a kit? How do you order one?
@@TheSuperduty2006 the kits are not yet available for sale. The development is still going. It is possible to have an engine specially build with the kit.
@@sbrouwer3458 which kit is it? Small block chevy kit?
@@sbrouwer3458 I waa looking at bullets supercharger but this one looks to fit so much better.. Can't wait for a kit to become available
woah so cool
I think the headers would help get heat away from the engine. That's always been a problem on 6.2/6.5
What were the power numbers. And what boost pressure are you running?
215 bhp and 510Nm 0.7bar pressure.
Also they have tried a different pulley and it got up to 250bhp, 505Nm. At 0.90/0.95 bar.
@@sbrouwer3458 thats pretty good from a 6.5. Thanks
@@sbrouwer3458 marine versions were 250hp and way too smokey to install into road vehicles
I'm sorry! Perhaps I'm reading this wrong as I've been drinking. You're tell me that a Rotrex Supercharged 6.5 litre V8 "only" produces 250 bhp! With around 370 - 380 lbs ft of torque? You're joking right. Please tell me this is a joke. I work with someone that has a 1.9 litre Turbo 4 cylinder Seat that makes (after turning) 230bhp and 330 lbs ft. I fitted a rotrex supercharger to my EP3 Honda Civic and got great gains. Rotrex are very good. I'm stunned at how such a large capacity engine makes so little power once fitted and tuned to run a supercharger. That's embarrassing. Theres 3.0 litre 6 cylinder diesels that run more power than that as standard!
@@jimmyfarley5581 My exact words.
Its centrifugal supercharger correct??
Correct
Horsepower and torque
if youre going to supercharge a diesel, wouldnt a screwtype be better? since they dont really like revving
It is the same as with a screwtype. They are both connected to the same belt. The size of the pulley makes the difference.
@@sbrouwer3458 yes, but a centrifugal supercharger works like a turbo meaning they are more rpm limited. A screwtype gets less efficient with speed but it gives a more linear curve ?
@@FrmerK20 correct. A centrifugal supercharger wants revs to make power. A screw doesn't. A screw would have been far better.
you may want to install a boost pressure valve
Garbage engine. I don't get why anyone would pour money into one of the worst diesels ever made. The cranks snap at anything over 300hp. They blow headgaskets like no tomorrow in stock form at 200hp. They sound like shit. The injection pumps are garbage to. They honestly just suck. Put money into a 5.9 12 valve.
your just jealous because you dont know any better. They have the same power rating as a cummins and weigh 300 lbs less !!! They use less fuel and are much better for driving and off roading. I think all you know is that you and your foolish friends dont know how to properly maintain one of these fine pieces of history that saved north americas ass
The cranks do not snap over 300 horsepower. You get a Fluidampr harmonic balancer, you ARP stud the top and bottom of the engine. Then add fuel, a 1:1 turbo, exhaust and you're ready to go. The cranks only snapped because the stock harmonic balancer literally fell apart due to a bad design. Look up banghart customs, they made 550 horsepower 6.5 with a turbo. Reliably. As far as the head gasket's blowing, blame the 2.5:1 drive ratio of the stock turbo. The stock turbo and stock harmonic balancer are to blame on this engine not the actual engine itself. Of course the engine itself could have been better but those two items were the major downfall.
You talk all about power... on a motor made for MPG... that got MPG lol...
You'd make a great politician with that inside box thinking.
You obviously haven’t done your homework.