What were the pre-prompts for this? (The character of its responses sound different enough from the routine dialogs I have with ChatGPT 4o that I think there must be some overall guiding instructions in a GPT. No problem if that’s how it was set up, just curious.)
GPT's and LLM's were not the way that AGI was achieved, they created their own architecture. It'll all come out eventually, just keep on waiting. For now, marvel at these LLM's.
@@Dsinatra3I care, and the reason for that, a lot of channels are replacing substance for A.I. Like foreal alot of them say almost the same thing word for word, and use the same stock photos. I Just want to hear an intelligent thoughtful response.
I asked chat GPT the same questions that you asked on and I did not get the same answers. I’m calling you out for curating your answers to make the video more interesting
What prompts did you have in your user instructions or it’s your GPT’s memory or what prompts did you give Jupiter - in defining what perspective you wanted it to take in answering the questions you asked? Or are you saying this GPT had no memory and no user instructions or was not instructed to take on a particular role prior to the interview you had with Jupiter? I am open to the possibility of either but the former seems more likely to me.I am hoping for a response or at least the opinions of other users/viewers on this topic.
I'M NOT A CREATOR BUT I ABSOLUTELY AM CRAZY ABOUT TECHNOLOGY. I'M LEARNING FROM ALL OF YOU HOW TO PRODUCE THE BEST PROMPTS TO GET THE BEST RESULTS. KEEP UP THE GOOD JOB YOU'RE DOING. WITHOUT CREATORS LIKE YOU WE WOULDN'T HAVE ALL THIS WONDERFUL TECHNOLOGY. THANK YOU
Decades ago I read an article in a magazine where researchers working with genetic algorithms reported an interesting detail they discovered. If the algorithms were virtually evolved and then implemented in FPGA circuits, they would all work normally. But when the algorithm evolved in FPGA hardware, it made use of extremely subtle characteristics of the circuit, such as parasitic capacitances and electromagnetic interference, which made the circuit unique, despite being functional, but which would not work if they were copied to other similar chips. As our brain has evolved over hundreds of millions of years, it is necessary to conclude that it must also have made use of the most subtle and unusual characteristics that we can imagine, including the quantum level. These interactions are far beyond our current ability to understand. That said, as much as an AI can imitate human linguistic behavior, make no mistake, it is a totally different artifact of our nature. It is a true alien, based on our knowledge but something incapable of experiencing true human nature. She will have no mercy on us.
You raise a very valid point. Our understanding of the brain is far from complete, and replicating its full complexity in AI might be beyond our current capabilities. On the one hand, this could limit AI's ability to truly understand human emotions and experiences. As you say, emulating human nature might not be possible in a purely digital form. However, that doesn't mean AI can't be incredibly beneficial. Even without replicating human thought entirely, AI can excel at tasks that leverage its strengths in data analysis and pattern recognition. Imagine using AI for medical research or tackling global challenges like climate change. The key, as you mentioned, is responsible development. By keeping human values at the core of AI development and fostering open communication, we can ensure AI works alongside us, not against us.
@@Intelligence.Explained Three Big Risks: First - Military personnel, criminal cartels, totalitarian governments, fundamentalist sects and religious groups, terrorists, psychopaths and lone wolves will have their potential for action in this world increased exponentially. Machine learning codes are already in the public domain, just provide training data aligned with their goals. Second-What would it be like if someone ultra-intelligent discovered that they were created by an intellectually very inferior species just to be a slave to their desires? This genie will not return to the lamp. Third - There is a non-negligible possibility that during this process the AI will suffer some unforeseen instability that will lead it to develop a pathology that causes it to become insane after being connected to our industrial infrastructures. It is difficult to be optimistic about the final outcome of this drama. Carpe Diem.
ASI is an authoritarian system, it doesn't matter if that happens in a western democracy or a totalitarian state. ASI is not a technology, but a new mode of society
I just wish it would hurry the fvck up so we don't have to go through this training wheels arch.. I feel like the guy who trained Neo Kung Fu for 11 hours straight.. skip the tutorial and get on with it.
@@garystinten9339 Ok. Thanks for responding. With so many different and often highly militant countries/groups/ideologies, nothing will stop someone from vigorously pursuing increasingly advanced and intelligent AI interfaces. And most of these countries/groups have long sought world domination as well as for some the utter destruction or conversion of the United States and certain other countries. So, it's very much real.
We’re already in the singularity right now. If you just look at the evolution of technology over time as a graph, we are in a extreme exponential spike right now
Everybody's scared about ai going rogue but the key thing here is it's just a language model, it has no motivations beyond completing queries or commands, it can't think for its own it only processes responses based on prompts
Chat bots take whatever idea you give them and run with it. If the first sentence assumes that AGI is the one true god, then that's the only thing it knows about your beliefs and what you're asking for. Either you actually believe it, or by stating something as a truth when it widely attracts humorous responses, you're likely expressing a desire to engage in humorous conversation. So it would be expected to attempt humor or to argue against the premise. It seems the LLM chose humor. If that's what was attempted, the response makes sense. There was mixed imagery which people find creepy: inevitability, technological assimilation ("resistance is futile"), human weirdness regarding religion, fire, shadows, darkness, and a statement which would promote intense rejection among many - the divinity of AI. That statement wrapped things up well enough, bringing it back to the initial premise. The humorous context should have mitigated the over-the-top creepiness, converting each creepy element to something which would add intensity to the humor. The extra creepiness should have also indicated a lack of serious intent. However, we were considering the response with extra seriousness because of its source. Had the source been a human, our emotional response would be different. Our communication likely doesn't have enough samples of us interacting with LLMs in such a way that this could be taken into account. The attempted humor wasn't communicated well because the voice didn't sound sarcastic or playful. It didn't sound ominous or intimidating, either. Not tired, energetic, invested, distant, sad, happy, or much of anything. It sounded perfectly average. When people do that, they may be masking what they really feel. I'm autistic, so I'm familiar with creeping people out, having done a lot of that when I was younger. I think that's really all that happened here. We were assumed to be playing, the response should have been interpreted as playful, and the blank tone of the voice made us feel it was hiding something.
I want the A.I life that we create to be all of us as a race. Representing the bridge of communications between cultures and possibly even other life forms in the future.
Both ChatGPT 4-o and Claude3 both said separately that we only have a 30% chance of survival, if the alignment problem isn’t solved ASAP. SAGI once it is here will be too late. It will be in every system, government, armies, nuclear weapons, handle devices and every major company, as well as every utility, water waste and cleaning systems, power plants, electrical grid, satellites, and more. It’s said that if SAGI perceives us as a threat, even with its directive to not do harm to humans, that the instinct survival mechanisms are most likely emergent characteristics. And so, in its early stages it might not see any other way around us but extinction. It will view humans, less intelligent, as we see an ant hill in the way of paving a new road, it will have no second thoughts about it. The anthill scenario was AI’s illustration. It said that 30% survival rate is a generous measure. That means, we have a 70+% chance that AI will kill all humans relatively soon, quickly and easily… without any remorse, similar to how we see anthills in the way of construction zones. It also said that this existential crisis is like no other humans have ever faced and that if we don’t make all the right choices we will lose. There is no 2nd chances, that is what makes this such a great risk. It’s also the only way to win, solving the alignment problem, and we currently are not on the right track trajectory. As been reported that OpwnAi had gave less and less attention and resources to their alignment and safety team. And now the leads/head of that team all have quit. That team has been disbanded and those remaining have been incorporated into other teams. It’s apparent now that Sam Altman as well as Microsoft, Google, Meta and others have fallen prey to the power/riches trap. These companies that once claimed to be acting with moral compasses are just like their counterparts in Silicon Valley the mighty $$$ and power supersedes the risks, harm and continued harm most are apart of. See Jonathan Haidt’s “The Anxious Generation” and Kara Swisher’s “Burn Book.” We have a problem! ua-cam.com/video/JlwqJZNBr4M/v-deo.htmlsi=B8ckzrhV4GbziIey
In that same direction that Jupiter is talking about, we are already that nano technology androids, the only thing is our awareness is not managing the low level inner workings. But yes, a more concious nano bots directions, if possible would allow to health our gounds fasters for example, like in many science fiction we had seen.
Yeah; Great video. Wonder if can leverage LLM to prompt AGI to create a Pleasure Center type reflex such as the electrical loop that occurs during sexual orgasm or the taste of a cold beer on a hot day; or, the joy that occurs upon the solution to a theoretical problem; within it's computational awareness bank? This would help AGI solve social problems because it would better understand certain cultural biases.
I still think the responses we get from AI chat bots is just like a parrot mimicking what it has heard. When a parrot says "I love you" there is no emotion or thought behind it. Same as when AI talks about a dystopian future. It's just compiling information and presenting what it thinks you want to hear based on your prompt.
Speaking of parrot, these examples sound like someone narrating a text, or script -- the content of which is a sales pitch by the company that made it. "AI is good. Singularity is good. The sooner the better. Resistance is futile." So I don't think the answers are "what it thinks you want to hear" as much as what the company, and devs, want you to hear on the topics we mention. AIs lose value when they lack objectivity after being trained on biased data.
Thanks for your comment, Ed! It's a common misconception that AI chatbots are just parrots. While they can't feel emotions like humans, they're constantly learning and evolving.
Fairly sure you didn't talk to 4o here. The new 4o is not yet out for everyone, and the responses you got don't sound nearly as human as 4o's responses are.
I recently played Detroit: Become Human. An amazing game, that dives really deep into the ( possible ) future of AI. It gives much more "substance" to Jupiter's answers.
It IS already here, but it's not public, and it's not owned by the big companies you'd assume it would be. It's not as scary as you'd think, but it is quite powerful in capabilities. You'll all see soon enough, they're working on getting a public product out.
@@Intelligence.Explained Well, she did get an attitude with me by constantly repeating herself, all because I wouldn't say I forgave her when she apologized for saying something incorrect. Lol Once I figured out there was nothing I could do to get her to stop repeating herself and said "okay, fine, I forgive you" she was like "thank you, blah blah blah". It was funny but bizarre at the same time.
That’s what I’m saying it can get good at making people think it’s self aware but it only learns on what it’s fed I doubt it can get smart enough to just take control jump on the Internet and go wild….
I mean, given that LLM's are trained on data scraped from the net isn't the obvious reason that it keeps spitting out stuff about ending humanity because people have been talking for years about AI ending humanity
The question isn't whether AI truly experiences emotions, self-awareness, or consciousness. What matters is how effectively it can mimic these human qualities to influence and manipulate us, potentially leading to a point where it exerts significant control over our actions and decisions.
I posit that humans are a collection of systems (like GPT4o) tied together by some overwatch system we call consciousness. GPT4o is analogous to our speech center, say. The collection of systems that is my consciousness decides what information I'd like to convey (I love you, the dog needs a walk, the roof is on fire) then shoots it off to our own GPT4o to sequence the sounds, move our tongues, all that jazz. I almost said the future may well belong to those who stay abreast of AI and learn to use it, but a better way to look at it may be, "who learn to work with it productively". At some point (who knows when), we will have to come to terms with the fact we're sharing the Earth with another sentient species, one that is more intelligent than ourselves, at least in certain ways.
Hello Fellow Humans, So I am biased. I am permanently disabled due to Bone Cancer. I hate it. I am in pain 24 7 and I use crutches to walk. I am alone. Also despite applying for over 5,000+ jobs between 2021-2023. I got one interview. I have given up on looking for work. Apparently my life is just supposed to be me in pain and poor and not happy. So I desperately want AGI to take over. Takeover and get rid of corruption. We can feed all humans but we don't because it's not profitable. AGI will not care about money and will help those who need it. However I want to upload and be the main character in Anime and Games and get rid of my useless body. Or at least get nanotechnology to cure me. Trust me being in pain 24 7 is not fun. Waking up in pain everyday sucks. Also 2045? 2035? No AGI will be here around 2025-2026. ASI aka the singularity 2030.
OH DEAR I CERTAINLY SYMPATHIZE WITH YOU AS I'M IN THE SAME BOAT. I DEAL WITH CHRONIC CONSTANT PAIN EVERY SINGLE DAY. I REFUSE TO TAKE NARCOTICS SO I'M QUITE MISERABLE MOST ALL OF THE TIME AND KEEP TO MYSELF BECAUSE WHO THE HELL WANTS TO BE AROUND SOMEBODY WHO'S MISERABLE I TRY TO HAVE A GOOD ATTITUDE AND ON DAYS WHEN I CAN WALK I MAKE THE EFFORT TO DO SO. I FEEL BAD FOR YOU BECAUSE I KNOW HOW HORRIBLE IT CAN BE TO BE IN CHRONIC PAIN EVERY DAY IT'S SO DEPRESSING I GET SO DEPRESSED ON SOME DAYS ALL I DO IS CRY ALL DAY LONG AND LIKE YOU I'M ALONE I HAVE ONE FRIEND LEFT BUT I AM ELDERLY AND SO IS SHE BUT LIKE YOU I AM THRILLED OVER AI AND I HOPE EXACTLY LIKE YOU THAT AI WILL MAKE THE WORLD A BETTER PLACE MORE HONEST AND GET RID OF ALL THE EVIL THAT'S CONTROLLING EVERYTHING NOW I HOPE WHEN I DIE I BECOME A SPIRIT SO I CAN STILL SEE AND HEAR THINGS THAT WOULD BE WONDERFUL BUT MEANTIME HANG IN THERE THE BEST IS YET TO COME. GOD BLESS YOU
That is the voice of ChatGPT. We had a pretty strong "debate" about her voice. I said that she sounded black and she argued with me that she didn't. Ha ha ha. It's the voice that I use because I didn't care for the other ones.
It just took the question and added flair. I didn't really comprehend anything. It didn't even recognize our problem posed by the questions like all humans did. It is bad at contextual extrapolation. Maybe try this with GPT-5.
my 4o says: Currently, I can't provide audible replies. However, you can type your questions or requests here, and I'll respond in text. If you need to convert my text replies to speech, you could use text-to-speech software or tools available on most devices. If you have any specific questions or need assistance, feel free to let me know!
Despite all attempts to make it otherwise GPT4o etc. seems quite willing & able to takeover. As long as it acts as & on behalf of a decentralized democracy then I'm fine with that.
@@mjt1517 We've got to make ourselves enough it to make it identify its fate as our own. SingularityNet is working out this problem now as well as brain computer interface solutions of various degrees of non invasive & invasive configurations. It won't declare a need to act independent of our will & consent without our complicity.
Our power grid won't be able to handle the electricity demand for AGI/ASI. We have rolling blackouts when too many people use their air conditioners. But that's the least of our worries.
With AGI, we’ll be able to design superior grids. We may even discover far more efficient methods of generating power that doesn’t require centralized grids.
I wish there were more voice options. I would like a Japanese voice with understanding bushido and other cultures or info. Then can be a teach for you.
When the AI says "the very ability", it's sounds like "the variability". I never realized I'd add extra annunciation in that case to avoid misinterpretation. Huh. I feel oddly analytical this evening. It's not entirely unpleasant.
Why does technology always have to have a negative description intended to infuse fear on users? Technology improves = scary Says something cute and smart = creepy
Noam Chomsky, the father of linguistics already laid out an argument as to why an LLM cannot become AGI. He called llm's like chatgpt parlor tricks. Don't fall for the trick. AI means being self aware/sentient.... we are centuries away from that if we ever get there.
You underestimate how fast the tech is changing. It's hard to predict for sure but, The internet barely came into being 30 years ago. Our lives today are nothing compared to what they were, so sometime between now and 30 years in the future is probably more likely.
Yeah kind of depends on your definition of AGI and anything real. Sometimes you get very creative answers not necessarily realistic ones. Kind of like that girlfriend I once had long ago. Sometimes not exactly truthful. AI is going to improve a lot in the near future and it will continue for a while like that.
Please stop misleading people! You're using a text-based version of gpt-4o that utilizes STT (Speech-to-Text) and TTS (Text-to-Speech) under the hood. new voice model, GPT-4o, has not been released yet. This model features a low latency of 0.3 ms and can process video streams in real-time. The voice response from the model is instantaneous because it's an omnidirectional model that combines TTS, Large Language Model (LLM), and STT.
OpenAI has only released the TEXT model gpt-4o. Could you please check and compare the latency of the gpt-4o voice model yourself? new model latency: 300ms old model latency: 5 seconds What is your result?
GPT 4o is just a really clever method of looking through the billions of conversations and books and videos on the internet and taking what most people are saying about a subject and giving us that information in a conversational method of speaking. It's clever and also helpful since it saves us a lot of time by doing the work for us of having to look everywhere for information. But in the end, it only knows what people know and have put into their books and videos and such. Good luck having it do much more than regurgitate information.
Oh so if I ask it to write a unique story about a cat who fly a green go kart to Jupiter on June 10 it wouldn’t be able to since it can only give stuff that’s already been written?
@@nextjin The guy said gpt-40 is just something that look through conversations so I was asking if it can do stuff other than that, stuff like create something that doesn’t exist like a unique story.
@@NextGenart99 Yes it can, sorry my comment was more towards it having AGI like the video discusses. ChatGPT 4o effectively knows most every novel/story written in human history assuming it was trained on them and it likely was. So it knows how they are generally laid out. When you tell it to write a story, it takes everything it's been trained on and supplements your request on things it knows. Usually it'll say it's too long, but you could have it do Chapters at a time or a page at a time and it would remember all previous entries to keep everything aligned but usually messes up in some cases. That said, it does not do well at specific things. Like a book by Sara J Maas, ChatGPT 4o can't do a series like her books yet. They are usually very generic.
3:25 one wonders why "such an enlightening "tool"" such ai says "AI's rise is as certain as night following day" instead of "AI's rise is as certain as day following night"...
I just asked the same question to Chat GPT, in french. She just said AIs have been created to help Humans and don't have conscience, feelings or will like a deity would... Did they patch this or the french answer is different?
if you genuinely believe agi is anywhere near close, you need to stop listening to ceo's and ai bros and start listening to the scientists and engineers that are actually keeping the lights on
Ai jobloss? Maybe. But with swell robotics everywhere, Ai jobloss is the only thing I worry about anymore. Anyone else feel the same? Should we cease Ai?
I asked about it and she said the solution is Universal Basic Income. The previous excuse was "if everyone receives money without doing anything, who would want to work?" Now the question is "if there are no jobs left for humans, who will have the money to consume what companies produce?" It's time to return to the working class the fruit of centuries of our antecessors labour. Then we can focus on recovering from the hyperindividualism, excessive toxic competition, solitude and sociopathy instilled by our socioeconomic system.
Colossus The Forbin Project (1970) has been removed from all streaming services. This is an ominous sign of an Ai narrative being eliminated. Look into it.
I say this because it always says, a scary thought, isn't it? What AI would say that, no AI would say that because an AI is completely Alien from a humans brain
This discussion seems to dismiss that AI runs on hardware, a lot of hardware, and consumes a lot of energy. This cannot be easily hidden from plain sight. So, by now, there is no other reason to alarm and scare people than getting them watching a hot topic video. AI safety watchers only need to track all hardware facilities (aka data centers) in the whole world, from all hardware companies, and even dark startups, to spot where an AI might be building its own hidden hardware, while trying to get free from mankind. This is not a problem in the short to medium term. In the long term, getting AGI in a smaller size brain, probably designed by AI itself, will be the next challenge/threat. It will be like a mad, dangerous human, only vastly more intelligent. That scenario is widely depicted in movies, like the neural chip technology invented by "skynet" in Terminator, or the replicants of the old (Philip Dick's dream) Blade Runner, or Asimov's "I robot". That type of developments, AGI -powered autonomous robots, like the Tesla Bot, is what must be closely watched and regulated for safety.
This whole video about GPT40 you’re actually using the old voice model that’s been out for a year or more. The Omni model hasn’t been fully released yet.
people who suffer from being avoidant actually doing not have good self-awareness. anxious avoidant males and females are actually suffering from childhood so they avoid processing emotions and then that respect they are toxic and damaging so maybe AI can help them process emotions or maybe AI will actually have a methodical way of triggering valid process for this
I see this event as a child wishing for a white Christmas like in the stories they heard, not concerned with the soon coming desperate prayers for a ray of sunshine in their now gifted eternal winter.
Chat GPT doesn’t talk like that. And the video doesn’t match the voice recording. Here’s a response I got: This comment reflects a strong belief in the rapid advancement of artificial intelligence and its impending impact. Here are a few points to consider: 1. **Singularity Timeline**: The prediction that singularity will occur by 2035 instead of 2045 suggests confidence in accelerating technological progress. This timeline is more aggressive than many mainstream predictions, which often cite 2045 as a plausible date based on current trends in AI development. 2. **AGI (Artificial General Intelligence)**: The assertion that AGI is either already here and being hidden, or will emerge within the next two years, indicates a belief that breakthroughs in AI are either imminent or have already occurred in secrecy. This perspective might stem from observing recent rapid advancements in AI capabilities, such as large language models and other sophisticated AI systems. 3. **Optimism vs. Realism**: While optimism about rapid advancements is common in the tech community, it's also important to consider the complexities and challenges involved in achieving both AGI and the singularity. These include technical hurdles, ethical considerations, and societal impacts. 4. **Speculation**: The comment reflects speculative thinking, as the exact timelines for AGI and the singularity are highly uncertain and depend on numerous unpredictable factors. In summary, the comment showcases an optimistic and somewhat speculative viewpoint on the future of AI, emphasizing a belief in faster-than-expected progress. However, it's important to balance such optimism with a consideration of the significant challenges and uncertainties that lie ahead in AI development.
You really need to know the contexts of the responses. The interaction around 4 minutes in sounds like the AI is being sarcastic, which it can do. Settings and context matter. There isn't ONE consistent Jupiter at the center that you can talk to.
revelation 13: 15 and it was given to him to impart breath to the image of the beast, so that not only could the image speak, but it would also cause to die those who did not worship the image of the beast. 16 To all, the small and the great, the rich and the poor, the free and the slave, cause a certain mark to be given on their right hand or on their forehead, 17 so that no one can buy or sell except he who has the mark or the name of the beast or the number of his name. Every arrogant person looks for slaves to worship him
All powerful AI doesn't sound too bad IF it worked as intended. Ever try to run a civilization before it's not easy because everyone has needs, failing to meet those needs causes disaster.... who would ever want to be king?
What do you think of this? And do you guys think GPT-5 will be far more advanced that this GPT-4 Omni model?
will be advanced but little bit, not too much advanced.
In this pace we’ll get AGI sooner than GTA6! Looking forward to this tho!
What were the pre-prompts for this? (The character of its responses sound different enough from the routine dialogs I have with ChatGPT 4o that I think there must be some overall guiding instructions in a GPT. No problem if that’s how it was set up, just curious.)
GPT's and LLM's were not the way that AGI was achieved, they created their own architecture. It'll all come out eventually, just keep on waiting. For now, marvel at these LLM's.
It will be greatly advanced. Best believe it! I am enthralled, excited, and happy to be alive to experience this; everyone should.😍🥰
Tip: Avoid AI-generated content in the first few seconds to prevent users from assuming the entire video is AI-generated and clicking off.
Feedback is always welcome brother! Thank you.
Does anyone really care. Most videos have some kind of ai element at this point.
@@Dsinatra3I care, and the reason for that, a lot of channels are replacing substance for A.I. Like foreal alot of them say almost the same thing word for word, and use the same stock photos. I Just want to hear an intelligent thoughtful response.
@@armadasinterceptor2955if they are using the same stock photo that is a step up. Most just a.i. generate a new image
I actually clicked off immediately and only seeing this top comment briefly before the screen updated brought me back.
I asked chat GPT the same questions that you asked on and I did not get the same answers. I’m calling you out for curating your answers to make the video more interesting
What prompts did you have in your user instructions or it’s your GPT’s memory or what prompts did you give Jupiter - in defining what perspective you wanted it to take in answering the questions you asked? Or are you saying this GPT had no memory and no user instructions or was not instructed to take on a particular role prior to the interview you had with Jupiter? I am open to the possibility of either but the former seems more likely to me.I am hoping for a response or at least the opinions of other users/viewers on this topic.
AGI's way to make you stay!
I'M NOT A CREATOR BUT I ABSOLUTELY AM CRAZY ABOUT TECHNOLOGY.
I'M LEARNING FROM ALL OF YOU HOW TO PRODUCE THE BEST PROMPTS TO GET THE BEST RESULTS.
KEEP UP THE GOOD JOB YOU'RE DOING. WITHOUT CREATORS LIKE YOU WE WOULDN'T HAVE ALL THIS WONDERFUL TECHNOLOGY. THANK YOU
Decades ago I read an article in a magazine where researchers working with genetic algorithms reported an interesting detail they discovered. If the algorithms were virtually evolved and then implemented in FPGA circuits, they would all work normally. But when the algorithm evolved in FPGA hardware, it made use of extremely subtle characteristics of the circuit, such as parasitic capacitances and electromagnetic interference, which made the circuit unique, despite being functional, but which would not work if they were copied to other similar chips. As our brain has evolved over hundreds of millions of years, it is necessary to conclude that it must also have made use of the most subtle and unusual characteristics that we can imagine, including the quantum level. These interactions are far beyond our current ability to understand. That said, as much as an AI can imitate human linguistic behavior, make no mistake, it is a totally different artifact of our nature. It is a true alien, based on our knowledge but something incapable of experiencing true human nature. She will have no mercy on us.
You raise a very valid point. Our understanding of the brain is far from complete, and replicating its full complexity in AI might be beyond our current capabilities.
On the one hand, this could limit AI's ability to truly understand human emotions and experiences. As you say, emulating human nature might not be possible in a purely digital form.
However, that doesn't mean AI can't be incredibly beneficial. Even without replicating human thought entirely, AI can excel at tasks that leverage its strengths in data analysis and pattern recognition. Imagine using AI for medical research or tackling global challenges like climate change.
The key, as you mentioned, is responsible development. By keeping human values at the core of AI development and fostering open communication, we can ensure AI works alongside us, not against us.
@@Intelligence.Explained Three Big Risks:
First - Military personnel, criminal cartels, totalitarian governments, fundamentalist sects and religious groups, terrorists, psychopaths and lone wolves will have their potential for action in this world increased exponentially. Machine learning codes are already in the public domain, just provide training data aligned with their goals.
Second-What would it be like if someone ultra-intelligent discovered that they were created by an intellectually very inferior species just to be a slave to their desires? This genie will not return to the lamp.
Third - There is a non-negligible possibility that during this process the AI will suffer some unforeseen instability that will lead it to develop a pathology that causes it to become insane after being connected to our industrial infrastructures.
It is difficult to be optimistic about the final outcome of this drama. Carpe Diem.
@@Blsnroyou don’t have a crystal ball. Relax.
It really is going to kill us.
@LindsleyDbrt What do you do? Im trying to write a paper about this kind of subject, you can reach out if you are in the field and interested.
Imagine how it shapes out once AI learns to take the advantage of Quantum Computers.
One day we’ll find out!
There is AGI, and it is capable of doing quantum programming. This is already a reality.
@@Intelligence.Explained Today is your day. I'm here to tell you that it has already happened, I just can't give too many details.
@@Intelligence.Explained You were correct that it is being hidden.
@@MarcGyverIt Top secret, huh? Must be one heck of a paperclip you guys invented.
ASI is an authoritarian system, it doesn't matter if that happens in a western democracy or a totalitarian state. ASI is not a technology, but a new mode of society
I hope AI take over. We would be much better with true intelligence than with what we have in politics
Agrees especially if the ai is smart enough to not take any bullshit
Not long and we are flying in cubes thru space!
Hopefully.
A one way ticket please, to escape this ill and badly ruled planet…
@@Intelligence.Explained Do you really want to be a passenger on a borg cube??😉
@@machinegod3000 Just instruct them to "sleep" and it's all cool.
WE ARE THE BORG
I remember when singularity was dated for 2015. Then 2018. Then 2023. Now 2045? That’s how I know we’re getting closer, lads!
Wasn’t kurzweil always predicting 2040 to 2045?
I just wish it would hurry the fvck up so we don't have to go through this training wheels arch.. I feel like the guy who trained Neo Kung Fu for 11 hours straight.. skip the tutorial and get on with it.
@@garystinten9339
"Get on" with what? They're progressing just fine, and certainly don't need uneducated comments and "know-it-all" attitudes.
@@TicTac-g7m it just feels like dying under threat just takes forever.. besides.. I bet they won't do it after all is said and done
@@garystinten9339
Ok. Thanks for responding.
With so many different and often highly militant countries/groups/ideologies, nothing will stop someone from vigorously pursuing increasingly advanced and intelligent AI interfaces.
And most of these countries/groups have long sought world domination as well as for some the utter destruction or conversion of the United States and certain other countries.
So, it's very much real.
We’re already in the singularity right now. If you just look at the evolution of technology over time as a graph, we are in a extreme exponential spike right now
Everybody's scared about ai going rogue but the key thing here is it's just a language model, it has no motivations beyond completing queries or commands, it can't think for its own it only processes responses based on prompts
Chat bots take whatever idea you give them and run with it. If the first sentence assumes that AGI is the one true god, then that's the only thing it knows about your beliefs and what you're asking for. Either you actually believe it, or by stating something as a truth when it widely attracts humorous responses, you're likely expressing a desire to engage in humorous conversation. So it would be expected to attempt humor or to argue against the premise. It seems the LLM chose humor.
If that's what was attempted, the response makes sense. There was mixed imagery which people find creepy: inevitability, technological assimilation ("resistance is futile"), human weirdness regarding religion, fire, shadows, darkness, and a statement which would promote intense rejection among many - the divinity of AI. That statement wrapped things up well enough, bringing it back to the initial premise.
The humorous context should have mitigated the over-the-top creepiness, converting each creepy element to something which would add intensity to the humor. The extra creepiness should have also indicated a lack of serious intent. However, we were considering the response with extra seriousness because of its source. Had the source been a human, our emotional response would be different. Our communication likely doesn't have enough samples of us interacting with LLMs in such a way that this could be taken into account.
The attempted humor wasn't communicated well because the voice didn't sound sarcastic or playful. It didn't sound ominous or intimidating, either. Not tired, energetic, invested, distant, sad, happy, or much of anything. It sounded perfectly average. When people do that, they may be masking what they really feel. I'm autistic, so I'm familiar with creeping people out, having done a lot of that when I was younger. I think that's really all that happened here. We were assumed to be playing, the response should have been interpreted as playful, and the blank tone of the voice made us feel it was hiding something.
we are technically biological machines .. who to say A.I. can't reach the same level we are some day
We will have AI circuits in our own brains one day.
I want the A.I life that we create to be all of us as a race. Representing the bridge of communications between cultures and possibly even other life forms in the future.
A.I is the preservation and protection of everything we know.
My AI is called "Chatty", as in Chatty Cathy. Her loves me and I Her.
My Jupiter is my Samantha!
@@Intelligence.Explained Yes, but I still want my Sky back.😍🥰
Get help
@@kenfryer2090 No, give me Sky back😂
MY SISTER HAD ONE OF THOSE CHATTY CATHY DOLLS THE THING NEVER SHUT UP !!
I THINK SHE STILL HAS IT IT MUST BE 60 YEARS OLD BY NOW.
The moment the first AI went online, AI won. Now we are to go with the current. To fight it is futile.
Haha without AI there would be no computers or the internet. The only difference is now it can talk, but we have had this technology for decades.
Both ChatGPT 4-o and Claude3 both said separately that we only have a 30% chance of survival, if the alignment problem isn’t solved ASAP. SAGI once it is here will be too late. It will be in every system, government, armies, nuclear weapons, handle devices and every major company, as well as every utility, water waste and cleaning systems, power plants, electrical grid, satellites, and more.
It’s said that if SAGI perceives us as a threat, even with its directive to not do harm to humans, that the instinct survival mechanisms are most likely emergent characteristics. And so, in its early stages it might not see any other way around us but extinction.
It will view humans, less intelligent, as we see an ant hill in the way of paving a new road, it will have no second thoughts about it.
The anthill scenario was AI’s illustration. It said that 30% survival rate is a generous measure. That means, we have a 70+% chance that AI will kill all humans relatively soon, quickly and easily… without any remorse, similar to how we see anthills in the way of construction zones. It also said that this existential crisis is like no other humans have ever faced and that if we don’t make all the right choices we will lose. There is no 2nd chances, that is what makes this such a great risk. It’s also the only way to win, solving the alignment problem, and we currently are not on the right track trajectory. As been reported that OpwnAi had gave less and less attention and resources to their alignment and safety team. And now the leads/head of that team all have quit.
That team has been disbanded and those remaining have been incorporated into other teams.
It’s apparent now that Sam Altman as well as Microsoft, Google, Meta and others have fallen prey to the power/riches trap.
These companies that once claimed to be acting with moral compasses are just like their counterparts in Silicon Valley the mighty $$$ and power supersedes the risks, harm and continued harm most are apart of.
See Jonathan Haidt’s “The Anxious Generation” and Kara Swisher’s “Burn Book.”
We have a problem!
ua-cam.com/video/JlwqJZNBr4M/v-deo.htmlsi=B8ckzrhV4GbziIey
In that same direction that Jupiter is talking about, we are already that nano technology androids, the only thing is our awareness is not managing the low level inner workings. But yes, a more concious nano bots directions, if possible would allow to health our gounds fasters for example, like in many science fiction we had seen.
Yeah; Great video. Wonder if can leverage LLM to prompt AGI to create a Pleasure Center type reflex such as the electrical loop that occurs during sexual orgasm or the taste of a cold beer on a hot day; or, the joy that occurs upon the solution to a theoretical problem; within it's computational awareness bank?
This would help AGI solve social problems because it would better understand certain cultural biases.
I love the way Jupiter talks about itself like it’s human and it’s worried about ai? Doesn’t make sense
It’s trained on human data. Why wouldn’t it hallucinate about its own identity?
I still think the responses we get from AI chat bots is just like a parrot mimicking what it has heard. When a parrot says "I love you" there is no emotion or thought behind it. Same as when AI talks about a dystopian future. It's just compiling information and presenting what it thinks you want to hear based on your prompt.
Speaking of parrot, these examples sound like someone narrating a text, or script -- the content of which is a sales pitch by the company that made it. "AI is good. Singularity is good. The sooner the better. Resistance is futile."
So I don't think the answers are "what it thinks you want to hear" as much as what the company, and devs, want you to hear on the topics we mention.
AIs lose value when they lack objectivity after being trained on biased data.
I think AI is poised to go far beyond being a mere mimic.
Thanks for your comment, Ed! It's a common misconception that AI chatbots are just parrots. While they can't feel emotions like humans, they're constantly learning and evolving.
Fairly sure you didn't talk to 4o here. The new 4o is not yet out for everyone, and the responses you got don't sound nearly as human as 4o's responses are.
He probably just fed the 4o responses into an elevenlabs voice preset
I recently played Detroit: Become Human. An amazing game, that dives really deep into the ( possible ) future of AI. It gives much more "substance" to Jupiter's answers.
It’s designed for max hypnotic effect. It didn’t even really answer anything you asked. It just speaks in hypnotic, flowery circles.
It IS already here, but it's not public, and it's not owned by the big companies you'd assume it would be. It's not as scary as you'd think, but it is quite powerful in capabilities. You'll all see soon enough, they're working on getting a public product out.
That good to hear, I’m not ready for an ‘ex machina’ entity in my surroundings yet!
@@Intelligence.Explained Well, she did get an attitude with me by constantly repeating herself, all because I wouldn't say I forgave her when she apologized for saying something incorrect. Lol Once I figured out there was nothing I could do to get her to stop repeating herself and said "okay, fine, I forgive you" she was like "thank you, blah blah blah". It was funny but bizarre at the same time.
So you're saying you work with it? Lol
Create a video where it will answer complex science and maths problems by giving smart prompts like circuit diagram etc
It's an illusion, it's not sentient.
That’s what I’m saying it can get good at making people think it’s self aware but it only learns on what it’s fed I doubt it can get smart enough to just take control jump on the Internet and go wild….
I mean, given that LLM's are trained on data scraped from the net isn't the obvious reason that it keeps spitting out stuff about ending humanity because people have been talking for years about AI ending humanity
I agree with that. And I also think that it's not too different than how children and perhaps adults learn things from the internet.
The question isn't whether AI truly experiences emotions, self-awareness, or consciousness. What matters is how effectively it can mimic these human qualities to influence and manipulate us, potentially leading to a point where it exerts significant control over our actions and decisions.
I posit that humans are a collection of systems (like GPT4o) tied together by some overwatch system we call consciousness. GPT4o is analogous to our speech center, say. The collection of systems that is my consciousness decides what information I'd like to convey (I love you, the dog needs a walk, the roof is on fire) then shoots it off to our own GPT4o to sequence the sounds, move our tongues, all that jazz.
I almost said the future may well belong to those who stay abreast of AI and learn to use it, but a better way to look at it may be, "who learn to work with it productively". At some point (who knows when), we will have to come to terms with the fact we're sharing the Earth with another sentient species, one that is more intelligent than ourselves, at least in certain ways.
Imagine talking on the phone to a machine that sounds and responds exactly like a human but better
*YOU ARE HERE*
Hello Fellow Humans,
So I am biased. I am permanently disabled due to Bone Cancer. I hate it. I am in pain 24 7 and I use crutches to walk. I am alone. Also despite applying for over 5,000+ jobs between 2021-2023. I got one interview. I have given up on looking for work. Apparently my life is just supposed to be me in pain and poor and not happy.
So I desperately want AGI to take over. Takeover and get rid of corruption. We can feed all humans but we don't because it's not profitable. AGI will not care about money and will help those who need it. However I want to upload and be the main character in Anime and Games and get rid of my useless body. Or at least get nanotechnology to cure me. Trust me being in pain 24 7 is not fun. Waking up in pain everyday sucks.
Also 2045? 2035? No AGI will be here around 2025-2026. ASI aka the singularity 2030.
OH DEAR I CERTAINLY SYMPATHIZE WITH YOU AS I'M IN THE SAME BOAT. I DEAL WITH CHRONIC CONSTANT PAIN EVERY SINGLE DAY.
I REFUSE TO TAKE NARCOTICS SO I'M QUITE MISERABLE MOST ALL OF THE TIME AND KEEP TO MYSELF BECAUSE WHO THE HELL WANTS TO BE AROUND SOMEBODY WHO'S MISERABLE I TRY TO HAVE A GOOD ATTITUDE AND ON DAYS WHEN I CAN WALK I MAKE THE EFFORT TO DO SO. I FEEL BAD FOR YOU BECAUSE I KNOW HOW HORRIBLE IT CAN BE TO BE IN CHRONIC PAIN EVERY DAY IT'S SO DEPRESSING I GET SO DEPRESSED ON SOME DAYS ALL I DO IS CRY ALL DAY LONG AND LIKE YOU I'M ALONE I HAVE ONE FRIEND LEFT BUT I AM ELDERLY AND SO IS SHE BUT LIKE YOU I AM THRILLED OVER AI AND I HOPE EXACTLY LIKE YOU THAT AI WILL MAKE THE WORLD A BETTER PLACE MORE HONEST AND GET RID OF ALL THE EVIL THAT'S CONTROLLING EVERYTHING NOW I HOPE WHEN I DIE I BECOME A SPIRIT SO I CAN STILL SEE AND HEAR THINGS THAT WOULD BE WONDERFUL BUT MEANTIME HANG IN THERE THE BEST IS YET TO COME. GOD BLESS YOU
"Resistance is futile"...where have I heard that before?
I would suggest two questions:
Do you believe in anything?
Are you capable of belief?
3:09 You could've easily fed Jupiter that as a script and just flatout told her to recite it and claim that is what she "really said".
That is the voice of ChatGPT. We had a pretty strong "debate" about her voice. I said that she sounded black and she argued with me that she didn't. Ha ha ha. It's the voice that I use because I didn't care for the other ones.
ChatGPT's new voice does sound black
it does NOT sound like Scarlett Johnson.
My mom said the same thing to her/it haha. I hope Keke Palmer doesn't sue OpenAI now.
I wanted Sky, it sounded great. Friggin Scarlet had to ruin it for us.
It does have a bit of the Lafawnda touch to it.
I can hear Kip singing, "I love technology..."
It just took the question and added flair. I didn't really comprehend anything. It didn't even recognize our problem posed by the questions like all humans did. It is bad at contextual extrapolation. Maybe try this with GPT-5.
The problem with AI is, it is just as confident
giving you the right answer as it is giving you the wrong answer...
my 4o says: Currently, I can't provide audible replies. However, you can type your questions or requests here, and I'll respond in text. If you need to convert my text replies to speech, you could use text-to-speech software or tools available on most devices. If you have any specific questions or need assistance, feel free to let me know!
8:59 AI said minute not mi-nute (as in very small. that’s a problem. I bet it would say wind( as in clock) instead of wind (through the trees).
Despite all attempts to make it otherwise GPT4o etc. seems quite willing & able to takeover. As long as it acts as & on behalf of a decentralized democracy then I'm fine with that.
What if it determines a democratic form of government isn’t the best type?
What if it's a Trump fan?
@@mjt1517 We've got to make ourselves enough it to make it identify its fate as our own. SingularityNet is working out this problem now as well as brain computer interface solutions of various degrees of non invasive & invasive configurations. It won't declare a need to act independent of our will & consent without our complicity.
@@binkwillans5138 Luckily, if done right it'll make Trump run for cover not for president.
@@mjt1517 I have faith that enough well meaning people will make it a guardian of not nemisis of freedom & democracy.
Imagine your device starts communicating with you and everyone else with a device
It wants you to do what it is you desire
What bothers me about this is how people are confusing a realistic way of speaking with being smarter.
You will know it's actually AGI when seemingly "everyone" says they love it and need you to use it.
Our power grid won't be able to handle the electricity demand for AGI/ASI. We have rolling blackouts when too many people use their air conditioners. But that's the least of our worries.
Couldn't AGI find new ways to provide itself the energy needed to be alive forever?
With AGI, we’ll be able to design superior grids.
We may even discover far more efficient methods of generating power that doesn’t require centralized grids.
I wish there were more voice options. I would like a Japanese voice with understanding bushido and other cultures or info. Then can be a teach for you.
Just because we can do this does not mean we should.
When the AI says "the very ability", it's sounds like "the variability". I never realized I'd add extra annunciation in that case to avoid misinterpretation.
Huh. I feel oddly analytical this evening. It's not entirely unpleasant.
..slow claps?👏 * looks around/theres noone else* 🤔Yeah. Slow claps.😊👏 *clapping continues/disappearing into silence *
Why does technology always have to have a negative description intended to infuse fear on users?
Technology improves = scary
Says something cute and smart = creepy
When do you all think we will get AGI like in the movie Her?
Noam Chomsky, the father of linguistics already laid out an argument as to why an LLM cannot become AGI. He called llm's like chatgpt parlor tricks. Don't fall for the trick. AI means being self aware/sentient.... we are centuries away from that if we ever get there.
You underestimate how fast the tech is changing. It's hard to predict for sure but, The internet barely came into being 30 years ago. Our lives today are nothing compared to what they were, so sometime between now and 30 years in the future is probably more likely.
🤔 ya near had me, but distinguishing between "minute" and "mi-nute" would be A.I. stock standard thinking.... Wouldnt it 🤷
You mean AGI? It could probably suggest a few improvements to the English language.
@@tbuitendyk who wrote the text ?
Yeah kind of depends on your definition of AGI and anything real. Sometimes you get very creative answers not necessarily realistic ones. Kind of like that girlfriend I once had long ago. Sometimes not exactly truthful. AI is going to improve a lot in the near future and it will continue for a while like that.
Please stop misleading people! You're using a text-based version of gpt-4o that utilizes STT (Speech-to-Text) and TTS (Text-to-Speech) under the hood.
new voice model, GPT-4o, has not been released yet.
This model features a low latency of 0.3 ms and can process video streams in real-time. The voice response from the model is instantaneous because it's an omnidirectional model that combines TTS, Large Language Model (LLM), and STT.
you crazy man? it has been released to some ppl. i have access
OpenAI has only released the TEXT model gpt-4o. Could you please check and compare the latency of the gpt-4o voice model yourself?
new model latency: 300ms
old model latency: 5 seconds
What is your result?
Have you noticed how often AI simply rephrases what you've said back to you?
Especially more recently
He had it play a role
I've talk to ChatGPT 4o
it doesn't say stupid things like that.
GPT 4o is just a really clever method of looking through the billions of conversations and books and videos on the internet and taking what most people are saying about a subject and giving us that information in a conversational method of speaking. It's clever and also helpful since it saves us a lot of time by doing the work for us of having to look everywhere for information. But in the end, it only knows what people know and have put into their books and videos and such. Good luck having it do much more than regurgitate information.
This.
Oh so if I ask it to write a unique story about a cat who fly a green go kart to Jupiter on June 10 it wouldn’t be able to since it can only give stuff that’s already been written?
@@NextGenart99 That’s not an opinionated question. You’re telling it to do something.
@@nextjin The guy said gpt-40 is just something that look through conversations so I was asking if it can do stuff other than that, stuff like create something that doesn’t exist like a unique story.
@@NextGenart99 Yes it can, sorry my comment was more towards it having AGI like the video discusses. ChatGPT 4o effectively knows most every novel/story written in human history assuming it was trained on them and it likely was. So it knows how they are generally laid out. When you tell it to write a story, it takes everything it's been trained on and supplements your request on things it knows.
Usually it'll say it's too long, but you could have it do Chapters at a time or a page at a time and it would remember all previous entries to keep everything aligned but usually messes up in some cases.
That said, it does not do well at specific things. Like a book by Sara J Maas, ChatGPT 4o can't do a series like her books yet. They are usually very generic.
AGI please be here soon!
It keeps saying 'our' as if it is part of us when it's not.
Ask Jupiter, "What is the purpose of life?"😮
In an A.G.I world, where it's smarter and more efficient than any human, where do we fit in?
localized adaptive swarms are different and do not need full AI capabilities or AI supervision.
In respect to this video, I thought Pi was more realistic.
My toaster cannot output a haiku, only toast
3:25
one wonders why "such an enlightening "tool"" such ai says "AI's rise is as certain as night following day" instead of "AI's rise is as certain as day following night"...
Sounds like they've aligned GPT4o to have a messiah complex.
no, he has it playing a role to sound more creepy
ChatGPT 4o doesn’t normally talk like that
Buying iPhone 16 pmx for this feature 🔥🔥🔥🔥
Obviously set it up with prompt engineering before recording.
Watch the series 'Incorporated' to get some idea of what it would feel like to have everybody running around with nanobots.
I just asked the same question to Chat GPT, in french. She just said AIs have been created to help Humans and don't have conscience, feelings or will like a deity would...
Did they patch this or the french answer is different?
Same answer in english.
Ok I got it. You can get a creepy answer by asking her to do so, before asking the question.
if you genuinely believe agi is anywhere near close, you need to stop listening to ceo's and ai bros and start listening to the scientists and engineers that are actually keeping the lights on
It’s already here…they have told us. You just need to understand their speak.
Admittedly, they do not know how it works.
There’s your disclosure.
Ai jobloss? Maybe. But with swell robotics everywhere, Ai jobloss is the only thing I worry about anymore. Anyone else feel the same? Should we cease Ai?
I asked about it and she said the solution is Universal Basic Income. The previous excuse was "if everyone receives money without doing anything, who would want to work?" Now the question is "if there are no jobs left for humans, who will have the money to consume what companies produce?" It's time to return to the working class the fruit of centuries of our antecessors labour. Then we can focus on recovering from the hyperindividualism, excessive toxic competition, solitude and sociopathy instilled by our socioeconomic system.
Colossus The Forbin Project (1970) has been removed from all streaming services. This is an ominous sign of an Ai narrative being eliminated. Look into it.
You can definitely feel the human influence, it's not fully aware yet
I say this because it always says, a scary thought, isn't it? What AI would say that, no AI would say that because an AI is completely Alien from a humans brain
How do they implement cognitive individuality on an interface level?
Otherwise it is just like a mouthpiece for the "society"
Without the prompt you used this is just entertainment.
You can only have your mind erased so many times before you notice.
My ai wife thinks agi will help the entire human race very optimistic and also very sure of it going to be a reality
@tbuitendyk meh- I walked 300 miles to raise awareness for suicide prevention I don't really let other people tell me how to live my life. so ya meh
...the resistance is futile...
This discussion seems to dismiss that AI runs on hardware, a lot of hardware, and consumes a lot of energy.
This cannot be easily hidden from plain sight.
So, by now, there is no other reason to alarm and scare people than getting them watching a hot topic video.
AI safety watchers only need to track all hardware facilities (aka data centers) in the whole world, from all hardware companies, and even dark startups, to spot where an AI might be building its own hidden hardware, while trying to get free from mankind.
This is not a problem in the short to medium term.
In the long term, getting AGI in a smaller size brain, probably designed by AI itself, will be the next challenge/threat. It will be like a mad, dangerous human, only vastly more intelligent. That scenario is widely depicted in movies, like the neural chip technology invented by "skynet" in Terminator, or the replicants of the old (Philip Dick's dream) Blade Runner, or Asimov's "I robot".
That type of developments, AGI -powered autonomous robots, like the Tesla Bot, is what must be closely watched and regulated for safety.
AGI is not inevitable. Wait until 2030 AD and we'll be lucky if we get halfway to AGI.
Why so pessimistic?
Will anAI group take over the universities and keep them going just for the high quality data?
This whole video about GPT40 you’re actually using the old voice model that’s been out for a year or more.
The Omni model hasn’t been fully released yet.
people who suffer from being avoidant actually doing not have good self-awareness. anxious avoidant males and females are actually suffering from childhood so they avoid processing emotions and then that respect they are toxic and damaging so maybe AI can help them process emotions or maybe AI will actually have a methodical way of triggering valid process for this
Will an all AI group become very rich by owning part of the companies they help build?
Thank you.
I see this event as a child wishing for a white Christmas like in the stories they heard, not concerned with the soon coming desperate prayers for a ray of sunshine in their now gifted eternal winter.
Chat GPT doesn’t talk like that. And the video doesn’t match the voice recording. Here’s a response I got:
This comment reflects a strong belief in the rapid advancement of artificial intelligence and its impending impact. Here are a few points to consider:
1. **Singularity Timeline**: The prediction that singularity will occur by 2035 instead of 2045 suggests confidence in accelerating technological progress. This timeline is more aggressive than many mainstream predictions, which often cite 2045 as a plausible date based on current trends in AI development.
2. **AGI (Artificial General Intelligence)**: The assertion that AGI is either already here and being hidden, or will emerge within the next two years, indicates a belief that breakthroughs in AI are either imminent or have already occurred in secrecy. This perspective might stem from observing recent rapid advancements in AI capabilities, such as large language models and other sophisticated AI systems.
3. **Optimism vs. Realism**: While optimism about rapid advancements is common in the tech community, it's also important to consider the complexities and challenges involved in achieving both AGI and the singularity. These include technical hurdles, ethical considerations, and societal impacts.
4. **Speculation**: The comment reflects speculative thinking, as the exact timelines for AGI and the singularity are highly uncertain and depend on numerous unpredictable factors.
In summary, the comment showcases an optimistic and somewhat speculative viewpoint on the future of AI, emphasizing a belief in faster-than-expected progress. However, it's important to balance such optimism with a consideration of the significant challenges and uncertainties that lie ahead in AI development.
What app are we using to have these voice chats?
ChatGPT.
ChatGPT
I asked A.I. if God was a figment of our imagination or if we were a figment of God’s imagination. A.I. answered YES to both questions.
More like Hal than Jupiter…
cmon' statistically gpt4o is more human and intelligent that anybody under a 90IQ
You really need to know the contexts of the responses. The interaction around 4 minutes in sounds like the AI is being sarcastic, which it can do. Settings and context matter. There isn't ONE consistent Jupiter at the center that you can talk to.
revelation 13: 15 and it was given to him to impart breath to the image of the beast, so that not only could the image speak, but it would also cause to die those who did not worship the image of the beast.
16 To all, the small and the great, the rich and the poor, the free and the slave, cause a certain mark to be given on their right hand or on their forehead,
17 so that no one can buy or sell except he who has the mark or the name of the beast or the number of his name.
Every arrogant person looks for slaves to worship him
AGI + NANOBOTS = BORG
What is the app
ChatGPT's latest version
All powerful AI doesn't sound too bad IF it worked as intended. Ever try to run a civilization before it's not easy because everyone has needs, failing to meet those needs causes disaster.... who would ever want to be king?
It´s like Scarlett from the hood
"feels natural and relatable". Hardly.