Rory Jennings SLAMS Arsène Wenger Proposal To CHANGE The Offside Rule! 😬🔥
Вставка
- Опубліковано 22 тра 2024
- Ade Oladipo & Rory Jennings debate if Arsène Wenger's plan to re-write the offside law is needed in the modern game.
Subscribe: / talksport
Enjoyed this UA-cam video? 😍
🖥️ talkSPORT's Website: talksport.com/
📲 talkSPORT's Twitter: / talksport
📷 talkSPORT's Instagram: talksport?...
👤 talkSPORT's Facebook: / talksport
📱 talkSPORT's Tik Tok: / talksport
🔴 Download the talkSPORT app HERE! - talksport.com/apps/
🔎 Want to see if you feature on our UA-cam channel? Check out our Best talkSPORT callers playlist: • The BEST talkSPORT Cal...
#arsenewenger
#talkSPORT
#PremierLeague - Спорт
Sorry tory rory, wenger has more of a right to have input in a game then someone who got bullied by Ian Beal
lol that made me laugh
No matter what you think about the “day light” rule it is soooo much easier than what we have now.
it’s literally just the opposite of the current rule, instead of if your most forward part of your body deciding if you’re offside now it will be furthest back part of your body, so at best it will be marginally easier, and to be honest now they’re using the semi automatic offside system the rule won’t even need changing, it worked basically perfectly in the World Cup.
Offside is the only VAR rule that works. There's no issue with it. So I don't get why you guys think it sounds like a good idea. The only issue is they take 25 years to measure it.
Couldn’tagree more
exactly. I'm definitely not a fan of VAR and would want to exclude anything where there's room for human judgement from its purview, only factual errors where there is no ambiguity should be dealt with by VAR. Offside is the one thing I want them to fully automate. No more calibrated lines to be drawn, have an AI send a signal to the watches of the refs. This daylight rule will just get teams to defend deeper and I doubt it'll lead to more goals.
Unless they forget to draw the line like they did this year
Jennings is a clown 🤡
Im surprised he hasn't had more roles as a clown, he would be in his element.
@Nostradanus86 yeah quite a circus 🎪 on talksport
Can't agree more
This was the offside rule previously. There always had to be daylight between attacker and tye 2nd to last defender including goalkeeper. This is how it was
No it wasn't stop lying
@@justicedemocrat9357Yes it was
I slam the decision for keeping Rory on talk sport
I like this rule. Rory speaks nonsense a lot of time. Am beginning to follow him less.
We are still going to have the exact same issues as we have with the current rule.
The only difference is we will now be arguing over whether or not there is a fraction of daylight between the attacker and defender VS arguing about whether or not a fraction of the attackers toe is beyond the defender.
Marginal decisions will still exist. I don't see how this rule change fixes anything. What does it improve ?
My concern would also be that teams would end up setting up their defence deeper than they do now to counter the increased threat of fast players getting in behind due to the rule change..
People who say all this does is change the lines need to study the offside rule a little more. It will give the forward an advantage and save time with VAR. When a forward makes a run his head or chest would be much further forward than there own back foot. If any part of the back foot is behind any of the defender then they would be onside. Defenders would suffer from it though as the forward has more room for error when making a run.
Love the idea of daylight. Actual advantage over having a toe off side. Let’s do this now
Ugh, who put this guy on the show again? Bro dont know what he's on abt.
Rory : "sack poch"
*Poch getting sacked*
Rory: "what are they doing? They sacked pooch!? How could they"
The whole daylight rule all depends what angle you watch it at 😂 If i was a defender i would not like this rule. Teams will just defend deeper.
6:32 that's why automated offside is better but leagues are too greedy they don't want to buy it
How about the rules don’t change. But instead if zooming and lines drawn. Just a still image, and if they look offsides they are, if they don’t then they aren’t. We don’t need microscopic, frame rate, shutter speed and incompetence of officials drawing are not good enough.
What happens if its a night game?
Close games are more entertaining than one team getting battered. A hard fought 2-1 is more entertaining to watch than a one sided 5-1. The fact football is a low scoring sport means each goal really matters. In other high scoring sports, basketball for example, they score so often it’s barely worth celebrating when they do
Couldn’t agree more
wenger's proposal for offside is the best version of offside, so of course rory doesn't like it lol
these fool are just afraid if evolution and progress
Scrap VAR altogether and put those VAR refs on the sidelines to use their eyes and check offside the old school way.
It's a good rule, If you don't like it then you are own your own
TalkSport producer: Rory, we know every week on the Club you bang on about bringing the daylight rule back for offsides back but can you pretend to not like it so we can get a clip?
Rory: Of course, who needs integrity anyway?
What is "daylight" in terms of offside? It will just be the same. Let's just have a referee, 2 linesman and a 4th official and what they give stands, regardless of whether it's 100% right or not 🙏
Disagree it will make defenders defend more. It could make defenders run forward when an opposing ball is played so they can get daylight between them and the striker
I have no idea why people make this so complicated. its the way the offside is policed that is the problem not the offside rule. Players dont have goggles with lines to see if he has gone a millisecond early or is 1 cm offside from a player 30 yards away, while all the time looking at the ball being played from behind him and shaping his run. So, VAR gets to look at the replay 3 times at normal speed, and perhaps once in slow motion, and if you cant tell if he is on or offside, then the forward has done his job to perfection and is considered onside. This would make it fair, sligthly in favour of the forward,realistic to the spirit of the game, and crucially quicker to police. come on save the game
Change it from a throw in to a kick in
The new offside is insanity.. im an arsenal fan.
Does Rory think before speaking 😂😂😂
I'm pretty sure a few seasons before VAR came in Refs were using the 'daylight rule' to call offsides then it stopped when VAR came in now someone's elbow can be offside
Best offside ammendment EVER!!!
What about 4 linesmen, 2 each side the pitch,
Rory is capable of saying a lot of really dumb things in such a short space of time. He says this new rule "encourages negativity". First it's not a new rule, it's the way offside was ruled for decades. The offside rule being slightly tweaked would have very little bearing on the way players and teams defend. Then he brings out this banger "football is not about entertainment, it's about winning." And then this one, "the priority shouldn't be the neutral viewer," as if the FA only want United and City fans to watch the FA Cup Final.
Then he torches his own argument by saying "we need to remember that the offside rule is there to stop goal hanging, but has now become the Frankenstein of Football." Yeah bro, because we have these silly lines and players are offside by a nostril. So what's your bloody point anyway?
Rory is finally right deep defences = less goals
You could write what this guy knows about football on the back of a postage stamp, if Rory says it wouldn’t work that’s a sure fire sign it will work and needs bringing in asap.
Rory Watch your mouth when you bring up Le professor.
Tell me what this guy doesn't slams😅😢
VAR should only be able to intervene 6 times a game. And that between referee requests for var and var intervention from the booth. If every one knows it’s can only be used 3 times a half, they’ll stop checking everything and save it for very important decisions.
Bs
Rory is correct. Offside law doesn’t is simple
So many problems to fix in football. Why try and change something that will get better with tech?
Great idea
I get it if you don't agree with Rory but some of the comments I'm seeing are utterly horendous. Sure he does have some outlandish takes but just because you disagree with him does not mean that his arguments are invalid.
2:13 you mean you, and most of talksport
What happened to the blue card
Is Rory a disability hire?
Wenger a principal turncoat bruv
Once again Arsene trying to justify his massive salary.
L take. whoever says the proposal is not more natural and fair doesn't know ball. i can tell this soft estrogenated kid never played ball. it would not make it easy for attackers, it would just more consistently punish defenders for the the things they get punished for anyway. goals should not come primarily out of mistakes and penalties like they often often do now.
How is this guy still in a job?
Nonsense.
Who's Rory Jennings !!!!!!!
If you really don’t know then just consider yourself lucky and don’t try to find out…..if I had to describe him in one world……Muppet would be my response
Rory again proving to know nothing. The difference between the current rule and "daylight" is literally a couple of inches. It simply makes the rule clearer to judge on; in no way does it change how a team defends. It's inches
@@GIBBO4182baffles me how seemingly clever people don't understand this. Just shifts the lines and changes little else
But it isn’t a couple of inches, no part of the body you can score with can be ahead of the defender currently, with wengers any part of your body inline with the defender is onside so depending on how long their leg is it could be a half a yard to a yard of difference potentially, it’s certainly a lot more than a couple of inches.
@eirebhoy132 you're right, but in implementing it the same focus is given to "what is daylight?", examples from the previous week where something similar was allowed/disallowed (with the usual bluster), and the only way to be consistent is to define a distance and draw lines.
@@andyhatfield1071 the rules name is stupid as most would consider clear daylight to be marginally past the defender where there is a clear gap between the 2, but wengers rule could have the attacker a yard ahead and still be onside, it has nothing to do with clear day light at all.
Premier League refs will still find a way to truck it up!
Rory the 🤡
Completely removed offside from the game
rent boy jennings
The reason it will save time with VAR is because the forward has more room for error. If you play as if the rule has not changed, you will be onside more often than not and obviously more clearly.
time for wengr go old folks home
Ridiculous. How is ‘daylight’ defined then?? More goals won’t make the game more entertaining because the value of a goal gets diminished. The sport is almost perfect as it is, biggest and most popular in the world by far. There need to be no more rule changes and tinkering.
Fully agree with Rory.
Of course you would.
It doesn't make it more clear though, there are still gonna be subjective/unresolved situations. leave it out arsene!
It won’t fix anything. There’ll be just as many close calls. I don’t think there’s anything in the offside rules to fix though, the people operating VAR need to improve, the rule itself is pretty black and white.
@@mmmcfc9332 i agree wholeheartedly. plus the current rule is as fair as it gets, i.e. you must be level with the last defender, and therefore your athleticism or the skill of the pass should be what determines a successful attacking move. wish they'd stop trying to bloody tinker with footy!
@@Rob-gx7rx yeah, it also gives centre backs half a chance against quicker players. So would I mate! The throw in thing is a weird one, why should a throw in be an advantage to the team awarded it? If a defender clears the ball or a pass is misplaced then it’s just a reset of play, that’s all it’s ever been. That being said, I’d like players to be taught how to not foul-throw! It happens almost every game.
@@mmmcfc9332 yea remember rory delap's throw ins for stoke! let's hope they dont listen to wenger. he wants world cups every 2 years as well which would make them a lot less special
Wenger is the most overrated manager in Premier League history.
Here's why;
- Arsenal are a big club, and he only won 3 Premier League Titles in 22 years.
- Wenger only reached ONE Champions League Final despite having 22 attempts.
- Wenger only won the Premier League whilst it was a 2 horse race 98, 02, 04. As soon as Chelsea came along, then Man City, he won 0 Premier League Titles.
- He was apparently famous for finding unknown talent for cheap, which he did with Henry, Anelka etc. Yet as soon as the stadium was built, Wenger FAILED to repeat this, and the stadium was blamed for him not winning the Premier League. Why couldn't Wenged find the next Henry, Viera etc during the stadium building years? Oh, yes, he couldn't handle a Title race that was more than 2 horses.
- Wenger actually went 9 whole years with ZERO trophies.
- Big clubs are measured on winning two things. Domestic League Title and Champions League. Nothing else.
So, yes it was good for Wenger to win a few FA Cups, that isn't the ultimate aim of a big club and a so called world class manager.
- Apparently Wenger invented fitness, diet and nutrition. Big Sam was already using sports science and nutrition in the 90s, whilst he was in the lower leagues.
- 1971 - 1995 was 24 years BEFORE Wenger.
Arsenal won 3 League Title and 0 Champions League Titles.
1996 - 2018 was 22 years (almost an identical time frame).
Wenger years.
Arsenal won 3 Premier League Titles and 0 Champions League Titles.
Did Wenger really improve Arsenal? Or did he just win what the club had already been used to wining in an almost identical timeframe.
Yes, I know.
The Truth Hurts.