Kierkegaard & the Crisis in Religion (Walter Kaufmann on Existentialism 1960)

Поділитися
Вставка
  • Опубліковано 4 сер 2021
  • Dr. Walter Kaufmann gives the first talk in a 1960 series on existentialism. He begins by discussing what he takes existentialism to be and then goes on to discuss the life and thought of Søren Kierkegaard, particularly in relation to the modern crisis of religion. In the next talk, he discusses Nietzsche and the crisis in philosophy, and then Sartre and the crisis in morality. This comes from a 1960 series on existentialism which is now in the public domain. Note, the audio has been edited and improved.
    Existentialists take human existence and the human condition to be a fundamental issue. They tend to be radical individualists who privilege our lived experience and choice. They focus on themes such as: freedom, authenticity, the individual, meaning, anxiety, alienation, death, dread, the absurd, contingency, and nihilism. They are often also suspicious of any fixed, pre-determined human nature, objective/universal values, and abstract philosophical systems. Some of the most important existentialist thinkers (or at least thinkers associated with existentialism) include Jean-Paul Sartre, Martin Heidegger, Søren Kierkegaard, Friedrich Nietzsche, Dostoyevsky, Karl Jaspers, Albert Camus, and Simone de Beauvoir. (My Description)
    Clip of Simone de Beauvoir on Existentialism & God: • Simone de Beauvoir on ...
    Hubert Dreyfus on Husserl, Heidegger & Existentialism: • Husserl, Heidegger & E...
    Nietzsche on Nihilism & the Death of God: • Nietzsche on Nihilism ...
    #philosophy #existentialism #kierkegaard

КОМЕНТАРІ • 16

  • @johnnyroycerichardsoniii3273
    @johnnyroycerichardsoniii3273 Рік тому +3

    Such an amazing series of lectures from a great mind on great minds …! Thanks so much for sharing!!!

  • @languagegame410
    @languagegame410 2 роки тому +6

    more KIERKEGAARD, please.

  • @thecapn_uk8034
    @thecapn_uk8034 Рік тому

    Superb... thank you!

  • @liambishop9888
    @liambishop9888 2 роки тому +4

    This is great! Thank's for curating all this philosophy content. I hope you post the rest of the lectures.

    • @Philosophy_Overdose
      @Philosophy_Overdose  2 роки тому +4

      Oh, I definitely will. I just wanted to fix up the audio a bit first, as usual.

    • @liambishop9888
      @liambishop9888 2 роки тому +1

      @@Philosophy_Overdose That's good to hear, thank you.

    • @giuseppe5686
      @giuseppe5686 2 роки тому

      @@Philosophy_Overdose if possible add subs too for videos like these.
      Thank you

  • @watchfuleagleson
    @watchfuleagleson Рік тому +1

    "Existence precedes essence" was famously announced in a lecture Sartre delivered to college students because, as he later claimed (undoubtedly due to the flak he got from Heidegger et. al.), he didn't think the students were intelligent enough to understand his real ideas. In fact, Sartre himself taught the opposite. As I look around me, everything I see has an essence, identity, meaning, use. I don't have to look at an object until it coalesces into a lamp. I don't have to figure out who I am before beginning my day. If, instead of cribbing from each other, teachers had actually gotten into Sartre, that nonsense would have died an early death.

    • @uiPublic
      @uiPublic 10 місяців тому

      Lest denying of light itself go extinct.

  • @l.siqueira8742
    @l.siqueira8742 Рік тому

    Great content! Thank's for sharing!
    Just an observation: I think that we gotta be cautious in afirming that, according to Kierkegaard, religious faith opose to science.
    I've been reading some scholar's work on his thought and, as far as I've read, it seems to me that this is more of a particular reading of his works than a exposition of what Kierkegaard meant by "faith in virtue of the absurd".
    Edit: Based on my readings, I also think that Kaufman's interpretation of Kierkegaard's argument regarding the biblical episode of Abraham and Isaac on Fear and Tremble does not correspond to what Kierkegaard himself really thought about it.
    Kierkegaard surelly didn't want to extract the consequences that Kaufman's extracted of it.

  • @juvenalhahne7750
    @juvenalhahne7750 20 днів тому

    Perfeita! Voce ve e percebe que ainda nao tinha visto mas vendo se alegra por sentir que estava a espera!

  • @uiPublic
    @uiPublic 10 місяців тому

    He 'existed & experienced' the same as a Job & Abraham of the Bible ago, therefore witness to the 'essence' of being in Christ if who is the greater a Judge than our Conscience that He's capable raising up from death pangs like a Lazarus or Tabitha no guiles in them unlike the rest of us confessed Sinners before God Almighty's spirit?!

    • @uiPublic
      @uiPublic 10 місяців тому

      Here an overdose of Philosophy may make it 'intelligent' a Jew or anybody else being persecuted for own Faith, yet stupid enough not hiding Truth if not as intense, intimate individualist.

  • @farazahmad7229
    @farazahmad7229 4 місяці тому

    Had Kierkegaard been alive today he would have become muslim.

  • @johngulino2651
    @johngulino2651 8 місяців тому

    Voice is almost incoherent.