The Bible and Western Culture - Kierkegaard's Leap of Faith
Вставка
- Опубліковано 2 вер 2020
- You can find Fear and Trembling here amzn.to/3Qrcmzk
This is the official UA-cam channel of Dr. Michael Sugrue.
Please consider subscribing to be notified of future videos, as we upload Dr. Sugrue's vast archive of lectures.
Dr. Michael Sugrue earned his BA at the University of Chicago and PhD at Columbia University.
"People who do not know how to remain silent, do not know how to talk" What a tremendous quote. Great lecture.
this and his criticism of the “machines” of his age really made me want to learn more about him. his insight is pretty incredible!
That’s like "What we cannot speak about we must pass over in silence." Wittgenstein
”Even a fool who keeps silent is considered wise; when he closes his lips, he is deemed intelligent.“
Proverbs 17:28 ESV
🙏🏿✔️
It saddened me tremenduously to find out that Dr. Sugrue left us. Nevertheless, he will always be remembered through his high quality work.
RIP
I'm just finding this out from this comment. You cannot be serious....I'm saddened.
"Kierkegaard is a theologian with the soul of a poet and the analytical abilities of a philosopher."
So accurate
yes we heard that
I am so thankful for the work of Dr Sugrue and for these lectures being available online. Thank you for posting this.
I watch them all multiple times. They are a timeless vault of *unfiltered or agenda* knowledge
@@PSYCHOTROLLSLAYER and??
The average acct if I'm not wrong is about 7-8 years old.
Ie. Unless he's dead he's still around no? 🤔
Ohhhh and hey you replied? Sooo what was your point exactly?
@@Psycho--Troll_Slayer Three years is nothing
"Are you willing to go beyond the domain of MERE rationality?"
That's such a good quote. Rationality is not the basis of all things.
Fear & Trembling in Las Vegas
Chesterton's book Orthodoxy is good on this. He says something like:
The madman is not someone who has lost their reason, they are someone who has lost everything but their reason.
"Rationality is not the basis of all things," he rationalized.
I listened to this lecture more times that I can count on cassette back in the 90's. Glad you published them for all of us.
I've listened to all of this guys lectures 1,000 times too. I feel like i've taken a course in philosophy at a very good school.
Any link for transcript of this video??
0:21 Who Was Soren Kierkegaard?
2:28 Manifesting Psychic Difficulties
3:32 Pseudonyms Kierkegaard wrote under, plus he gave himself bad reviews.
5:26 Chose to Wander Alone 6:33 An Individual At All Costs.
9:30 Faith Has No Justificiation "Man Proposes, God Disposes"
You will not add and subtract your way to God.
12:30 Is our Conscious our standard to Judge the Bible?
13:45 Abraham and Issac 15:44 There is No Rational Justification of Faithful Actions
16:21 BINARY OPPOSITION: YOU CAN HAVE A OR B, No AB BA
17:08 A Leap of Faith, Criteraless 18:50 Wander into Despair or Walk With God.
20:26 Fragments, going on and on and on Irony Layered Upon Irony
21:47 The Meno, Reminder, Revelation
23:38 _The Present Age_ 25:09
25:39 Athens was a mistake
26:29 Resentment, Hatred, Envy 27:36 Gossip About NOTHING
27:58 "People that do not know how to remain silent, do not know how to talk."
28:24
29:56 Tortured Individual embodying Job 30:12 “All Theology is Blasphemy”
31:07 Take whatever God dishes out, he does not want your advice.
32:18 Self-Sacrifice for Faith.
33:07 You must Choose
33:27 Kierkegaard vs Martin Luther, The Truly Righteous Man Unifies Work and Faith.
34:51 A Mediation on Faith
36:00 Confront Your Own Soul,
37:34 “Being a Christian is not an Event, it is a Process.”
_Parable of The Rich Young Man_
38:24 The Theological Joker, The Wise Fool
40:11 Disarming in Irony and Candor
40:52 20th Century Atheistic Existentialism
41:39 Comedy and Christianity 🎭 ✝️
42:23 “Melancholy Men Have The Best Sense of Humor.”
thank you
This channel is criminally underrated! Dr Sugrue's lectures on philosophy are the best available online, and believe me, I've perused the philosophy lectures from nearly all of the major universities and professors of philosophy who post content online, even subscribing to some 3rd party learning platforms to try and educate myself (not to mention spending over a grand on philosophy books). I've watched most of the "independent content creators" who cover this type of material on YT & it breaks my heart how often the views of these great thinkers are misinterpreted & misrepresented.
Fingers crossed one day I get to go back to college and actually earn a degree , and when I do I genuinely hope my professor is half as good as Dr. Sugrue is)
Mr.AM4D: When I took philosophy in college, thank God I had a wise Professor- from a homework of having each student make a physical drawing on paper of what Socrates was drawing on the sand in Meno, to posing a problem from Kant to be worked out as homework. And I remember the day when he put the first word of the gospel of John on the chalkboard, "Logos." But Truly, Dr. Sugrue is in a class by himself.
"Not to mention spending over a grand on philosophy books"
"When I have money, I buy books. If any is left, I buy food and clothes"-Erasmus
Go for the philosophy, stay for the indoctrination.
I’m not an expert on philosophy lessons, but I can tell this teacher is the best I’ve heard too in explaining this matter.
Professor Sugrue, it's hard to express how insightful and useful these lectures are!! Your mastery over the language, ideas and culture are truly astonishing. Thank you.
Awww Kierkegaard... this the one I’ve been waiting for 😄👍🏻👍🏻✌🏼
This is an incredible insight into Kierkegaard. I would never have deciphered him this well on my own.
I would have
@@JayyVee41 the fact you said this makes me think you would not.
@@ColinMillr and this is where you’d be wrong Colin. I am practically a genious when it comes to Keerkaguard
@@JayyVee41 congratulations
@@ColinMillr thank you Colin. That was very kind of you
Kierkegaard is a profound literary talent . One of the greatest ironist to have blessed the sacred page 🙏
What a great lecturer @Sugrue is. I forget everything around me while listening to this man. Every word, every sentence and the tone of Dr. Sugrue echoes in my brain. Lots of love.
What a crazy legend this Kierkegaard was...
Dr. Sugrue, you are the best orator and professor I've ever attended to! Love from India❤
my sentiments exactly (Also from India)
What a FASCINATING lecture! 😃 I kept trying to turn this off because I have work to do! However, I couldn't do it!😅 Thanks for sharing this. I really enjoy Dr.Sugrue's delivery; SO engaging!🧑🏻🦱👍🏽
“You shall not judge the lord, your God…. He doesn’t want you advice.” Brilliant.
This is gold. English is not my first language, but I can understand Dr. Sugrue´s every single word.
this guys ability to discuss so many topics in such an eloquent and well understood way is so impressive
This is my favorite one!
Best content on UA-cam. What a gift you and this channel are Dr. Sugrue!
The _ultimate_ leap of faith-radical freedom:
“As Hegel put it, what dies on the Cross is NOT the human incarnation of the transcendent God, but the God of Beyond Himself. Through Christ’s sacrifice, God Himself is no longer beyond, but passes into the Holy Spirit (of the religious community) [...] God is no longer the substantial master up there, God is - to put it in this way - the spirit of our community, the gift of freedom.”
-Zizek
“The idea of killing your son.....most immoral” another amazing lecture.
This is unspeakably edifying. Long live Dr Sugrue
10:47 *Kierkegaardian leap of faith* “One of the things that is wrong with this age is that it lacks faith. It not only lacks faith but it lacks even passion and passion is a necessary precondition for faith. You rational people-people with the souls of accountants I’m afraid are trying to add up and subtract your way to God and that is not how you will do it. You will do it only by making a leap of faith, by taking a chance.”
St. Morpheus
I found these lectures at a time in life I needed them, and was ready for them.. Thank you, universe.
I am in the process of watching all of Michael's lectures. I am in aww. Michael is so well spoken, I have learned so much. Thank you for posting these!
9000😮😅9
00😮9990😮99😅009😮😅
The Crisis of Faith - life tends to present itself as a series of unfolding morally ambiguous problems. Problems which the right path to take isn’t wholly understood. Problems where you must roll the dice & take your best chance.
Without this you stand no chance to the inevitable. Without this you cease to influence beyond that which you could control.
“He who loved himself became great in himself, and he who loved others became great through his devotion, but he who loved God became greater than all”.
Only this decision costs (not less than) everything. You must be willing to put up everything in this wager - this MUST transform your life. Need you not believe in God. Belief could be either, belief could be or. Nonetheless, you must choose.
Here you have no ground for making your judgement- meaning you must act on faith alone. Take a shot at your best hunch.
That is not to deny the existential terror which precedes this action. The leap of faith calls is forced upon all of humanity- with great Fear & Trembling. Whether you like it or not the leap of faith beckons you into the abyss. Neglect to act, and your hand is forced. your hand. That beyond knowledge. That beyond which we could conceive. Faith is not blind. Faith is courage in the face of crisis. The darkness which presents itself to you; masked through betrayal, death, and arbitrary malevolence & pain.
This Sugrue guy seems pretty good at what he does.
The understatement of all undetstatements
Just as Hume in the first part of his Treatise on Human Nature uses his incredible reason to argue the impotence of reason, Kierkegaard uses his incredible mind and reason to argue the impotence if reason. Neither understood that God gave us reason to make our lives better and navigate all the exigencies and benefits of life.
I cannot get enough of these Lectures!
Another amazing lecture- thank you for your postings of these amazing gifts.
Thank you Dr. Sugrue for sharing your briliant lectures. As a philosophy major these have not only been helpful in my studies but have futhered my love of wisdom.
It is amazing to be able to watch and learn from these lectures - what a gift. Thank you so much for making them available, they are truly incredible. So much to learn!
Its just so wonderful the way you inhabited each character when you did this and Nietzsche and others...it is so edifying...thankyou so much
I really appreciate your work. Ive actually used your lecture on marcus arelius while studying philosophy with my son.
This is so far the best video about philosophy I have ever had!
THANK YOU!!!!
I can't believe how much fun I enjoyed all the way till the end. Another great presentation!!
Wow, Kierkegaard is amazing. And what a great professor.
whats great about him?
This is a great lecture! ❤
Thank You!
♥️ Thank you !
thank you so much for these fantastic lectures. such a stark contrast to German law school ones and both highly informative and entertaining.
Now I can read Soren Kierkegaard
Impressive lecture professor most impressive!
Well done 😊
Thank you for uploading this narrative of the Western civilization.
Excellent!
Excellent Mr. Sugrue. Thank you for sharing the video. I finally put to use the set speed feature, 0.75 works perfect for me.
Thanks Prof Sugrue for your enriching content 🙏This lecture on Kierkegaard has helped me to understand where my sense of humor comes from 😂
Great ! Thanks 🙏
24:38 Rick Roderick echoes Kierkegaard here in his oeuvre, _The Self Under Siege._ That the failure of Orwell’s vision of a boot stomping on a human face forever is in the idea that there very well may not even be human faces as such in the future-that the self faces being extinguished in the Nietzschean “last man” and his slavish, narrow cosmos of nihilistic morbidity.
Kierkegaard=Fun. Only Professor Sugrue could get this idea across in spades.
"That Individual"
Makes me want to read more about philosophy. The way he speaks barely looking at some notes without the usual ums and ahs of many lecturers shows understanding that is rare. Well done. Ps I have to slow him down a little just to keep up.
Faith is something I am not capable of understanding
27:32 - Wow! Kierkegaard predicted Facebook and Twitter!
I came here to make the same obsevation!
To believe that within the multi-verse, there is a world in which Nietzsche responded to Kierkegaard. Imagine the written correspondence between the two, either in letters or books. How fruitful Western philosophy would’ve been if these two men were given a chance to have discourse
Nietzsche was meaning to read Kierkegaard before he died too. Nietzsche would have hated Kierkegaard for how committed he was to Christianity and blindly following the morality of it. But Nietzsche probably would have enjoyed Kierkegaard's style.
@@Tehz1359 I believe that Nietzsche would have more than respected Kierkegaard as Kierkegaard pushed humanity to choose either/or and not to ride the middle line. Nietzsche choose a side and thus, I believe both philosophers would respect each other. Also Nietzsche would grasp Kierkegaard’s irony in ways that the vast majority of people, including elite geniuses, would miss. They might not have been brothers, but they might have an odd relationship like the star jock befriending the uber geek in history class.
It sounds to me like they both wanted an ideal to strive for. One in the Superman and the other in the knight of faith. Which don’t sound too far off and I can see a conversation coming in.
@@xalian17 probably would have been a relationship somewhat similar to that of GK Chesterton and George Bernard Shaw
The many-worlds metaphysic is the kind of insipid idea I think both of them would cringe and laugh at. That's my meta.
He has changed so much on his recent videos.
i like the part when you mention frankenstein.
i also enjoy the ramblings, thanks for allowing me to listen to your thoughts. o7
22:07 Philosophical fragments
23:51 The present Age
30:10 edifying discourses
Great video, thank you very much , note to self(nts) watched all of it 41:38
14:20 - it’s telling that the childless virgin Kierkegaard thought the Abraham story is something to be admired.
this is a amazing
If choosing ethics or aesthetics is a choice between red and black at the roulette wheel, then choosing a particular religion is like choosing a particular number at the roulette wheel.
choosing a religion is more like choosing which version of bath salts you want to try.
Perfect thank 🎉❤
This is tremendous. So right for me right now. I see Kierkergaard as more of a prophet to me and this present age. Athens or Jerusalem.
Rest in Peace Prof.
"Melancholy men have the best sense of humor"
Made me think of Robin Williams…
@@cristianchelariu1707 Yep. Couldn't agree more.
Cripes.
Amazing lecure
2:48 “Truth _is_ subjectivity.” Which _is_ ex-centric according to psychoanalysis.
Hope later there can be transcripts
27:42
Damn. He was right in spades about this!
Kierkegaard is my Spirit Animal.
I'm always looking for new interesting lectures on Psychology/Philosophy, please let me know if you guys have any recommendations, would be highly appreciated
Kierkagaard sounds like a riot!!!
What is that intro music? It's so nice
I recently learned that it is actually impossible to think both rationally and empatheticly simaltaenously because the brain has to suppress one in order to activate the other. There was a recent study that showed this I don't remember what it was called though. So what he was saying about choosing one or the other is true but only in a transitory sense. Imo you need to rationalize in certain instances and empathize in other. As always it's a matter of harmony not an either or mentality.
Edit: harmony not an either or mentality
Thank you for this recording! My questions are, what is Kierkegaard's most pantheistic fruition movement he campaigned for? Must one always have leaps of faith to be a Nietzsche-inspired believer? Why are leaps of faith considered necessary to retain civil liberties and democracy? What is the most theistic form of computation-inspired philosophies according to Kierkegaard? Why are the fruits of faith considered superior to the fruits of mere justified belief? Did Kierkegaard believe Nietzsche's Super-Human philosophy ought to be the bedrock of fruition of idealism? What does it take to transcend post-post modernist regalia according to Kierkegaard? What is the sacrosanct torpidity of the geometries of idealistic labour according to a Marxist-Leninist reading of Kierkegaard? Finally, did Kierkegaard ever reject leaps of faith and instead embraced logical positivist dogmas? Did Kierkegaard consider himself a noble chariot of impressionistic idealism?
The aesthetic reading of the Bible, well that’s going to be thought for Peterson..
27:58 note to self
Fascinating lecture. I find absurdism and existentialism increasingly relevant schools of thought.
I wonder what Kierkegaard would retort to "Abraham reasoned" that God could raise the dead when sacrificing Isaac. Hebrews 11:19 shows a fusion of faith and reason that Kierkegaard seems to loathe.
It is a faith with reason, but also a relationship. Abraham had a relationship with Yahweh, and he knew "God would provide." Abraham knew God would not break the Covenant He made with him; how could he do that, for if He did, He would not be God. Think about Isacc's reaction? He follows Abraham up the mountain obedient, even getting on the alter, just the way Abraham is obedient to Yahweh's command. Why? Isacc has a relationship with his father; he trusts his father will not harm him, or has a reason for doing what he is doing. It is a faith, based on reason and relationship.
I think what Kiekegaard was hinting at wasn’t that you can’t use reason or that reason isn’t beneficial, but that the thinkers his time gave epistemic primacy to reason itself arbitrarily. Remember, Paul says only the fool is the one who rejects God, so the problem isn’t really reason but mans tendency today and in Kiekegaards time to use reason in every turn. Even the religious people were trying to reconcile this problem. Our reasoning skills are not perfect due to the fall of man in the garden of Eden.
I imagine he would say that Abraham's reason was ultimately futile. He would be right.
Was it done before a live audience? I enjoy his style of presentation.
There have been times in his lectures where someone in the audience laughs/ chuckles
Great video!
Question: So Kierkegaard tries to convince us that he did not make his decision to put all his trust in faith on the basis of what he presupposes?
Nope. He flipped a coin like the rest of us.
Thank you for this insightful discussion. Are your lectures available in written form?
Thank you!
Was it Kierkegaard or Dick Van Patton who said, "If you label me, you negate me."
9:04 i can relate 😆
Its kind of crazy how Kierkegaards critique of modernity rings true even more every single day
if you mean we dont pray to sticks and sky beings I agree it is less common today.
33:25
This is my only criticism and it has to do with Kierkegaard's perspective on the issue of Sola Fide (Justification by Faith Alone). In "For Self-Examination", one of Kierkegaard's "purely" religious works, makes his respect for Luther quite clear and shows a nuance in his pattern of thought. "Infinite humiliation and grace, and then a striving born of gratitude--that is Christianity." The ideal, that is, Christ, must not be watered down in the slightest, it is a biting indictment of the whole world, you must not sugar-coat it or weaken the dosage of the medicine in front of you. But then you should stop, and realizing the magnitude of the ideal, stand humiliated. It is then, once you have realized this insurmountable ideal you can't achieve and stand humiliated in front of it, then you receive grace (justification), and *as a result* (for Kierkegaard believed human works were like filthy rags, they couldn't justify you in the slightest) people strive for the ideal out of gratitude, not to merit or earn justification. As Kierkegaard himself put it (I believe in "Purity of Heart" though I could be mistaken), his works did not put him one inch closer to the Absolute, but rather made him realize more and more how much he was distant from the ideal. Kierkegaard was moreso criticizing the idea of faith as an intellectual idea that had no suffering to it, and even used Luther as an example of someone who actually had faith and how much it pained him. In a word, faith that obeys the command. "By faith Abraham..." offered up his son Isaac, that proved Abraham had justifying faith, but the work itself didn't justify Abraham.
But this is more of a categorical distinction, Kierkegaard is certainly very rigorous to his approach of works and his emphasis on them is bespoke in For Self-Examination as well as Judge For Yourself.
are these lectures carried out in eighties or nineties ?
upload more
Soren Kierkegaard: That Guy.
11:07 🔥
23:05 beginning of part about romantics; age without passion lacks values
I like the way that it seems that he (Dr. Sugrue) generally gives a fair account of the subject’s point of view. He’s not presenting a straw man or a parody of whoever he’s talking about but actually tries to be fair even when he clearly disagrees. As someone who clearly holds ambiguous certainty about there being a God, he’s able to present the convictions which Kierkegaard feels about the nature of his God very well.
That set is nearly as good as the current President's stage set.
Does anyone know the date of this recording? It’s clearly timeless but I’m just curious watching in November 2022.
1993
@@dr.michaelsugrue thank you good sir for your absolutely clear teaching of the great philosophers. ❤️🙏🏾🔥 we are indebted forever.
Kierkegaard a theologian? That definitely is a leap of faith.
I loved this lecture but do find it bias. The lecturer doesn't like Kierkegaard and almost mocks him slightly, such as saying it was the best thing he ever did for his partner to leave her. I can understand his perspectives and indeed the bewilderment of some of Kierkegaard's behaviours perhaps but, I think that doesn't do him justice. It's ironic because Kierkegaard didn't want 'just what makes sense', but Kierkegaard makes such sense to me.