Це відео не доступне.
Перепрошуємо.
Mining the Gold of Conflict | Myrna Lewis | TEDxCapeTown
Вставка
- Опубліковано 7 вер 2015
- Tension and conflict is given a bad rap; they are however opportunities for transformation.
Myrna Lewis has designed the 'U+Me Let's Talk' process to enable you to face foes, resolve the conflict, improve the relationship
and gain personal growth.
Myrna is a leading thinker and practitioner in the field of transformative leadership and facilitation. She together with her late husband Gregory Lewis a co-founded the Lewis Method of Deep Democracy whilst assisting South Africa's utility company transform from an Apartheid driven organization to align with South Africa's new democracy. Myrna has a M.A. degree in Clinical Psychology. Myrna consults locally and internationally around the complex issues rooted in personal, social, political change, diversity and minority issues. Myrna is the recipient of a 2001 Ashoka Fellowship award from the Ashoka Foundation based in Washington. In 2006, the United Nations recognised Deep Democracy as one of 80 leading African innovations, In 2008 Myrna was Finalist in the South African Business Women of the Year award In 2008 she published her book “Inside the NO - Five Steps to Decisions that Last”. Myrna is the mother of two and grandmother of four and lives in Johannesburg, South Africa.
This talk was given at a TEDx event using the TED conference format but independently organized by a local community. Learn more at ted.com/tedx
wow this is an underrated ted talk.
Highly Useful! Thanks for preparing and sharing your vast conflict expertise Myrna Lewis. Indeed AWESOME! Life is Good!
well done, thanks for this, linking personal conflict and planetary peace.
7:23 I find the philosophy behind their method very convincing. However, how does the statement that "no one has a monopoly on truth" hold in the face of certain scientific truths, such as climate change? It sounds like this philosophy would render scientific truths impossible. Do I get it right and it is incompatible with each other, or is there a way to harmonize them? Or, for example, does she refer to world views, rather than scientific truths?
Is something wrong with the audio? I got a completely unrelated dialogue when I tried to play the video.
Keep watching - it's related.
Lol