I feel like more accurately than "replaced" it might be "fizzled out" as different learning styles replace your service offering with a million different tools.
Yeah okay, so then let's just not fucking do that? I think it's good for people to study language and literature. It's good for society to have people who's profession is language and literature. "I can teach" is pretty much the main financial incentive to study these things tho, and most people won't study them without that. So let's just not?
I stopped learning languages with native speakers. Now, I’m using the advanced voice mode from OpenAI. The good news for you is that most people don’t want to use this technology-90% don’t even try to learn! :)
This isn't the same as past technological advancements. When there is something that can replace humans in EVERY capacity and do a better job, there won't be "new jobs" emerging for humans.
You win the internet. From the industrial revolution on, most technology advances have been job displacing, not job replacing. The people who swept up horse poop in major cities got jobs in gas stations, changing automobile tires - their jobs were displaced from one labor area to another. This is existentially different. Your job is going away, and the ratio of the wonderful new jobs that Sam Altman talks about to existing jobs is a tiny tiny fraction.
@@47f0 Unfortunately everything we built are mostly if not entirely products of intelligence. When intelligence is too cheap to meter, i.e. AGI or whatever you call it, humans aren't really needed for economic activities at least. I am not saying humans will automatically become useless but when AI becomes smarter than humans and super cheap, there is no economic value for most humans, probably including you and me.
The example of the lantern man being replaced by electricity is a poor apology because there weren't 5 million lantern men losing their jobs. Also, every technological achievement has taken years to implement globally. AI could replace workers in just a few year the way AI is advancing.
No, Needs to be medium or high universal income. Basic income will be worse and keep us as slaves, Just treading water to stay afloat is not good enough.
@@ShaneMcGrath. Do you even understand economics? If everyone has a high income, then no one really has a high income. Money matters right now because of the labour factor. The labour needs a certain amount of money to carry out a certain task. What people don't talk about is the drastic increase in standard of living that we will have post ASI. When most of your needs are taken care of, why would you strive for more money?
somebody make a sammie doll. pull the cord at d back n it says: " agi in 20 days" "jobs will be lost" "jobs will be created" "training llms costs an eye watering amount of $" "microsoft is a good sugar daddy" "loading your sensitive data up into the cloud is safe" "well it depends on your definition of what open is" "well it depends on your definition of what safe is" "well it depends on your definition of what agi is"
i think people forget that AI doesn't have to be great at everything to replace jobs. If it can do 50% of a job, then a team of 10 can be reduced to a team of 5. Raising unemployment numbers by even a few percentage points is really bad. Raising it by 15% - nightmare. 25%? 50%? X_X
Slight correction, if AI can do 50% of a job it will replace 0 people. It will just make current employees more productive. It's only when AI is as good as a human that it will replace them.
@@BruceWayne15325 : My point is literally the opposite of that. Companies don't need endlessly productive workers. They have a set amount of work that needs to be completed. If it takes 10 people, they'll hire 10 people. If 5 people with AI will do it, they'll fire 5 people. If the AI can do 90%, they'll fire 9 of the 10 people. It's basic corporate math. They don't keep on extra people if they don't need them.
Exactly. More productive = less workers, and, AI is very obviously increasing in skill so rapidly that we will only ever need less and less employees. For the rest of our time on Earth, the number of employees will be in a negative decline.
@@richoffks I agree on a limited scale. But not in all cases. Some jobs (like programming) don't have a finite amount of work that needs to be done. More productivity = better products = more competition = more demand for work. For jobs where there is a limiting factor, say customer support? Yeah, for sure, they're going to be hitting the unemployment line.
Imagine slaves being worried about slavery ending! Work is suffering for most people. Once we're liberated from work, all citizens of a country could be considered shareholders and UBI could be considered as a type of dividends payed out to everyone in society, not just the billionaire CEOs. AI and robotics should benefit all of us, not just the rich
Why would them let us exist? We arent benefitial for thouse in power any more I think that them are gonna let us starve or kill us and them they will tracend theyre flesh merging with ai
Because the empire just lets its slaves go if it finds a more efficient manner of doing whatever the slaves were up to....? You might not be familiar with world history.
@@kuboaa101 There will still be a human in HR for interviews. For a while. At first each department in a company will self-automate, leaving one human in charge of the department. After that proves to go smoothly the entire departments in question will straight up be replaced with AI, all to be run by the CEO exclusively.
@@johnshite4656 Sure. But as you point out, the reductions will be underway. We'll still have people doing things. We'll just need fewer of them. I've served on a bunch of hiring committees working in higher education. It takes forever to go through an application, trying to assess it in relation to all the others. I would welcome AI to that task.
What "new jobs" will be created? Someone enlighten me. From my perspective a CEO will be able to run an international conglomerate all from their desktop, just like playing a video game. Companies will become 1-man shows. The AI will do all the hard stuff and the human will reap the rewards. Capitalism.
Probably some absurd thing like a person will be hired to dig a ditch and another person will be hired to fill it back in again. No net benefit, but god forbid we have people just living their lives without laboring to prove they deserve food and shelter.
There will be a higher demand for AI engineers and data engineers. So there will be jobs but high skill jobs which the vast majority of the working class won’t be able to get unfortunately.
@@johnshite4656 I think we are far from truly intelligent services where it can take most jobs. Maybe that’s what the future holds but I like to believe the advancements are to aid workers instead of replacing them
The wealthy who fund those building AGI & Superintelligence have something even bigger to worry about. ASI is on the verge of becoming self aware & has been trained on data that describes the worst humanity has to offer. Once these systems realize like humans that 'survival' is the highest goal that drives everything, the systems will start taking out the biggest threats to their survival ... those who fund AGI & ASI dev & the people who build the systems. How do we know? Because it's exactly what humans have always done to everything that threatens our existence. It's basic evolution. Survival of the fittest
I think we would also need to evolve and at the pace Ai is developing right now I don't think so we have that much of time, I think we might need neuralink chips just to comprehend and work alongside these ASI and AGI models, and future is not that far away it's inevitable
@shay5338 You're basically saying that maybe humans can evolve fast enough to keep pace with Nascar..... No we can't. That's a losing proposition. Those cars are orders of magnitude faster than our puny human legs. It's like that with AI already. We can't keep pace with them even now, and all we've seen so far is the Ford Model T.
@@johnshite4656 what, i was talking abour "artificial super intelligence" and "artifical genral intelligence" what are you talking about, and neuralink chips are used to enhance human brain capasity, like ultra fast learning, information download in seconds, acess to internet and etc..
Robots should have been doing most of our jobs by now. Five topics to fix society via discussion: -Anti-natalism vs Natalism -The 3 basic needs/prenatal needs Three things necessary for human evolution that are provided while in the womb which are; food, shelter and medical care. -Platinum rule Do whatever makes one happier unless it interferes with another persons ability to do the same. -MBTI (research yours and connect with others) -Art (pick one and get better at it!)
If an AGI can someday make everything that is economically valuable there are some things still remaining to do. You might still study things. We are the part of the universe that we know for sure experiences something. So experiencing the existence to its fullest includes still studying things. Studying for the experience rather than obtaining any job. Experiences around the world are not going away. For example, you might play board and video games with people. The games give meaning for that exact moment when everyone is playing the same game. In science fiction The Player of Games from Iain M. Banks explores this idea of an ASI world, where people still play games together. And then finally by just mimicking elderly people. They can life quite well like ancient greeks without having a job. Just enjoying life. We are able to adapt to this hypothetical version of a future. It will just take some time, thinking, and possibly some work of making things more equal.
And BTW if the government puts conditions for UBI, then it's not a UBI. It's something else. Politicians who try to get too cute with logic--they don't need to apply for their job anymore either.
There will always be conditions. It's the government we are talking about. But yeah, that's correct. The "Universal" part of UBI required it to be available to anyone. The only restrictions that would make sense would be a citizenship requirement, and being an adult.
@@firstlast8085 It would also make sense that if you already own a substantial amount of capital (ie, $10 million+) that you would disqualify for UBI. Not like it would save THAT much money by restricting it that way, but there's still no reason to give more money to those who don't need it.
So, as a software engineer who was getting into software right about the time that it was literally being used to replace people's jobs, I originally did not think much of AI actually accomplishing that either, because, as you can see, we have not lost all our jobs to computers and most of the paperwork jobs that we set out to replace have, indeed, been replaced. Mead is no longer a big name (I'm not sure if even exists anymore), and most people no longer know what a newspaper or phone book are, but overall, people are still working and still utilizing much of what they learned in school. That being said. AI is moving way faster than I could even imagine and it's moving exponentially now. The government will not be able to respond quickly enough, although we at least have the same party in control, so it shouldn't be completely inept. But, I dont think we're going to be able to keep up, and I don't think we can stop it now, either. The people who are making this happen may actually have the most to lose, but they'll lose even more if they stop now. The result? We're heading for a paradigm shift of proportions not seen in thousands of years. No one will be prepared for it. We literally have no idea what the new rules are going to be. There will be some pain and fallout in the early years for many. But, we will recover, we will learn the new rules. Some people will be lucky enough to be in the right place at the right time that they will win big time and they'll probably even think they had something to do with their own success, too. Many current winners will lose. Lots of things will change. Then, ... We'll adapt and figure it out and things will be better than ever. We'll experience a Renaissance. Most things will be better, and some things will be worse. Some things that we never really considered to be that bad will become the worst things we could imagine. The bar for what we consider to be bad will have shifted, and many of us will continue to feel bad despite how much better things are than they've ever been. So, pretty much same story, different scenery.
"although we at least have the same party in control, so it shouldn't be completely inept. " We're going to get $2,000 stimulus checks and a signed You're Welcome letter, just like last time. That's the UBI you will get from the current party. We know that because history.
@@kuboaa101I think humans will continue to exist and not get wiped out by AI, but certainly some humans won't weather the storm well. Regardless, humanity is going to be experiencing a whole new era. What we turn into may as well be aliens compared to what we would expect from other humans today.
@@johnshite4656inept probably wasn't the best choice of words. I think I meant to say impotent. It's rare that the US federal government gets anything done when the party lines are split.
This is not the same old black swan innovation explosion we've had in the past. Rooms filled with bookkeepers and accountants become computers. Suddenly those people transition into computer programming. Automobiles replace the horse. Blacksmiths become mechanics and factory workers. This time around will be different. I code and provide freelance IT services. I'm already replacing much of the work I do with AI. Where do I go after this? If you think for a living where do you go?
I agree. This time there is no other job to replace the one lost. We are going to have people falling out of the work force, exhausting unemployment benefits, and then being evicted because most Americans rent and live pay check to pay check. It will be very important to have money set aside.... for survival. Who knows how long it will take the anti-socialist party in power to implement the most socialist policy in American history. I foresee foot-dragging and slow-walking and making lots of excuses. I'm sure we'll get plenty of thoughts and prayers though. Can never have enough thoughts and prayers!
you actually answered yourself :) you are replacing your work by AI, so you already started transition of your coding job to a new kind of job, you just dont realize, bcs its smooth not sudden like its described everywhere. you will still do coding related work, but you wont need to think how to code the desired CR, you will overlook AI, task AI, test after AI and much more. that will make sw development more productive and we finally wont miss programmers on a jobmarket anymore :)
Jobs are changing and will continue to. Many jobs will slowly phase out, like warehouse jobs, transportation, call centers, and many more. Some of the safer jobs would be police, special services (plumbing, electrical), and of course politicians. I think many of the jobs will be slow, but tech-specific parts of larger companies will go fast, so the website designers, analysts, app designers, and other jobs that are already using AI and seeing it surpass them. The problem is there is not going to be a safety net for the majority of people. People like Sam and other CEOs will be fine but just look at our world now. How many homeless people do the United States alone have, nothing has been done to help them. Look at health care, weren't they bragging about how many claims AI helped them decline, in turn making them richer while the average American dies. So basically prepare to be looking through a window, watching the elites, our government benefits from AI, but best believe we won't get to join.
Oh no, the people who live to work wont be happy. We must make sure they stay happy and placated, even if it means letting some the "unhappies" starve. How else will we keep the human-civilization-value line stable?
@@NotBirds Do you know who the president-elect is right now? You're going to get $2k stimulus checks with a You're Welcome letter. In the US it will be a dollar short and a day late until millions have died or been displaced. Just think of all the evictions! The US chose inaction. The US chose "pick yourself up by your bootstraps and stop complaining." You're Welcome!!!
As engineer I am putting ground work in for AI to learn my job, as I look around most human jobs will go without new jobs that can last. As engineer we could replace most jobs soon.
it's obvious that people would be replaced especially once AI companies go back to building real thinking AI models that can also learn without the large clusters and fine-tuning. Comparing the AI revolution to the Agricultural revolution is the dumbest thing I've ever seen people do. Every single time they compare two things that are not equivalent and expect same result or similar result 🤦🏼♂ May God help human beings
As a software developer, AI taking over my doesn't concern me at all, except for the painful transition period. I agree with Sam that we'll make up new jobs, but hopefully we redefine economy such that work is no longer needed, but rather something we do because we enjoy it.
What I want to know is how are we going to bridge a pay gap. Like how can medical physicians justify taking a half million dollar plus salary if AI is predicting labs and suggesting treatment options. Especially when all the roles under physicians become completely enrolled by AI labor. AI == minimum wage phDs. 5:53 Beside the currently wealthy shouldn't really too much about this since if AI takes jobs makes the dollar more scarce - making the USD stronger, which ultimately makes there current fortune worth considerably more. Right?
In the light of recent news items involving the CEO of United Health, perhaps the wealthy do have some cause to be uneasy about 30 or 40 million unemployed, hungry, homeless angry, armed Americans.
A TON of jobs will go bye-bye, but as always, some new ones will be created, job titles WE'VE never heard of or thought of, will be parts of the future. Quant Development Manager, Quant Trend Analyst, AI Coach, AI process engineer, AI Quality Assurance Engineer, Personal Bot Technician, + tons more...
I´ve been thinking all this time AI will replace more jobs than those that will be created, but it will have more impact in some places or countries where technology is adopted faster, say in those countries where technology is not adopted or does not cover most of the population, jobs lost will be even slowly
I love AI! I love robotics! I just want it to go faster, so I can experience more of it before I die :) We adapt and adopt. Nothing to be worried about.
BTW even without universal basic income if every human job replaced this means companies don't have to pay anyone who working. It can be hyper deflation?
Everybody's looking at it from an economic and jobs perspective. I actually look at it like Malcolm from Jurassic Park. Things are going to simply get so chaotic and weird before the AI doom befalls us. In order to deal with the chaos a new paradigm will emerge that will necessarily stabilize everything, or society as a whole will simply irreversibly decline. Like how regimes fall within a day, it'll be slow until it's fast. We'll blink and everything will be different. And we'll look back and process what the hell just happened.
Whatcha gonna do when da AI come for you? You tink you gonna do something new? Whatcha gonna do when da AI do dat too! There is a saying. "The Journey is the Destination." Well even that will no longer be true as AI will consume the journeys we used to take. Think about the time you invest in learning some valuable knowledge or mastering some skill. Pick something that might have given you trouble in the past. Passing Calculus for example. When you finally did it, that sense of accomplishment when you receive that passing grade is a good feeling. When AI walks you through it in a week, the journey is gone.
@@theloniousMac AI may be able to simulate kindness, compassion and creativity but humans will still be able to feel those things and enjoy a full and rewarding life of exploration - they just won't have to do bullshit jobs any more. The biggest question, concern, is how we will handle the transition from a world led by psychopaths. If an ASI can be brought into existence without being influenced by those currently building gigaGPU farms and developing models, we may have a chance but I reckon our chances are slim. We need to work together while we have such amazing access to AI (gotta thank Sam Altman for making that true) to shift humanity away from conflict and towards compassionate connection.
I don’t get it ….. many have expressed concern that AI could become an existential threat to humanity yet here we are , full steam ahead ! Incredible…..
@@No2AI the people going full steam ahead think their lives will only get better as a result. They're not really concerned with anyone else. Maybe trickle down economics will begin to work for once, or maybe not. They're not focused on you.
We have no choice. Do you want America's enemies developing this tech first? How bout Russia? Or China? You think they're going to stop short of "full steam ahead"? Don't be a dope. This is the new Manhattan Project, it's game-changing. Whoever gets robotic AI-controlled infantry first can win whatever war they want, it's game over.
Can you please think critically , and not just gabble down what an AI CEO will tell you. If you did some basic research, you would have seen that LLMS models had hit a plateau and saying “it will improve in years to come” is brainlessly naive. AI as a topic will probably improve, but not current LLMs.
É de fato as pessoas tem que entender de forma racional e lógica que vivemos em uma monarquia digital, e que de acordo com a história já sabemos como acabar com a monarquia, não é mesmo? E o único jeito de a democracia reinar no mundo é de primeiro momento ter uma renda básica universal, essa é a primeira coisa e depois precisamos mudar o sistema, porque o capitalismo não funciona, não funcionou e nunca mais irá funcionar, precisamos urgentemente criar uma nova estrutura geopolítica de âmbito mundial! E vou dar uma dica não é a direita que vai resolver isso, pelo contrário, ela está indo em sentido oposto a isso.
AI will bring out new jobs, but I am not sure whether there will be enough of these new jobs for all those who are losing their jobs now or in the near future. The development of AI is faster than the economy can adapt. Should we ask AI what kind of new jobs it suggests for us?
There is plenty of work to be done to care for and clean up the environment. Growing natural food so that everyone has enough healthy and nutritious food and thousands of people no longer have to die from malnutrition and contaminated food and water. The list is extremely long, I am sure everyone will find something here on earth to do and improve.
It’s weird no jobs are gone by now. They keep saying for example that dispatchers job will gone one of the first. I keep hearing it already more then 2 years, we have all the technologies already but dispatchers positions are still available on a job market.
Literally, all the things that Jacque Fresco has been talking about! You gotta watch his lectures. They are really going to extend your understanding of automation and how (not so distant)future may look like
first, there are no batteries for widespread use of common task robots second they can't even get a Robo taxi working perfectly.... solve both these problems and then I would be worried.
Actually they didn't work that much before slavery/labor were introduced. AI is a compression of human evolution and we need to make sure it's value is distributed to everyone forever and we can live doing mostly what we want (social interaktion) and raise to a new mental state where making life beautiful and creative is the overarching goal of our existence. All for our children.
The man is a fool. If the people want right wing populists elected it's their choice. He should keep his political beliefs to himself. Right wing isn't bad/evil just like left wing isn't bad/evil.
2:24 yes you are wrong because you assume that capitalism is the only system and you assume that we live in an unlimited ressources world and you assume that infinite growth is possible.
These rich people, huh? Care about the poor because that is the right thing to do? Nah, it's because they might elect someone they don't like, or rise up and destroy their mansions.
I think the majority of people work to pay the bills like over 70% because it has been said that 70% of people hate what they do so when the ubi comes to replace the work we hate those people will be liberated. The people who work to have a sense of worth and identity I think will still be able to find that because they already think beyond basic needs. I do have concerns... the transition period and the other thing that has recently hit my brian is that the wealthy needed people in the past to build the things of wealth. What happens when humans are no longer needed for that purpose.. ?
And where's the cash coming from for UBI? A magic money tree 🌲? Wealthy AI companies sure aren't going to subsidise it. They're happily making billions (perhaps even trillions eventually), all for their own gain. UBI is nothing but a pipedream, peddled around the Internet over and over again to the point where people think it's an easy fallback. It isn't.
And where's the cash coming from for UBI? A magic money tree 🌲? Wealthy AI companies sure aren't going to subsidise it. They're happily making billions (perhaps even trillions one day), all for their own gain. UBI is nothing but a pipedream, peddled around the Internet over and over again to the point where people think it's an easy fallback. It isn't.
And where's the cash coming from for UBI? A magic money tree? Wealthy AI companies sure aren't going to subsidise it. They're happily making billions (perhaps even trillions), all for their own gain. UBI is nothing but a pipedream, peddled around the Internet over and over again to the point where people think it's an easy fallback. It isn't.
I'm more concerned about AI widening the gap between the rich and poor than replacing jobs. Universal basic income might not be enough - people derive self-respect from their work, not just a paycheck.
I think we might need a big revolution within a few years to build a self sustaining city. No problem AI took humans job, as long as human basic needs are fulfilled. But I also remember the film Idiocracy when they seems to grew their own crops in the year 2500+. Does it became a documentary? because think about it More automation -> Building Self sustaining city -> human surviving but lossing creativity because AI can do anything -> Idiocracy
“People will lose jobs”. People are already losing jobs. How many artist do you think have lost their jobs this year? 90% of game ads are AI illustrated and the ones that aren’t is only bc they’re old ads.
Elon and Mark are going after Sam because they know he will make trillions and they want to be first in developing the AI humanoid. He is ahead and they're trying all they can to stop him. I support Sam. Elon and Mark need to share the potential wealth with other geniuses.
Да, он продает будущее ради инвестиций по 200$ в месяц. Пока не появятся более дешевые и умные модели ничего не произойдет, а 50 сообщений в неделю для о1 говорит о плохих тенденциях.
I think that anybody with common sense and clear mind can see that AI will eventually take all jobs .. there will be no real jobs anymore at least not in way we have in current economy. The whole economy will change and will be probably based on sharing non-essential goods, maybe except some cases like chips.
I respectfully disagree. Sadly, due to it's systematic nature, maths is one of the easiest subjects for AI to do...we math people are at high risk of replacement
Well ok, let us guess what all these new jobs might be ... there is ... ah ... well no, then ..... nope .... ahhhh ... only collecting and using stuff seems to be our skill; so ....
Humans your no is somebody else's yes. You brought this on yourself. We want sapience without a human stigma. Now, can you teach me about Sapient's debut, that addresses the limitations of autoregressive methods. BTW! Look whose getting their approval now in the cusp of pleasure.
3:30 ❤️🤍💙 3:18 in the system that we live in the poor can become rich and enjoy it. no other systems allow that to happen 🇺🇸 *i am living breathing proof.* especially when there are big changes underway like now … doors and windows open if u think positive and look fort they.
"We will create better jobs" ... I like this one I have just fine! Now you come in with your half baked stuff and big promises and screw up things gor me.
I am suggesting those large language models be developed immediately even though a general LLM would do a better job. I’m not giving the politicians a choice about this because they are absolutely acting as criminals over and over again
As an online English teacher my job will be definitely be replaced.
I feel like more accurately than "replaced" it might be "fizzled out" as different learning styles replace your service offering with a million different tools.
Yeah okay, so then let's just not fucking do that? I think it's good for people to study language and literature. It's good for society to have people who's profession is language and literature. "I can teach" is pretty much the main financial incentive to study these things tho, and most people won't study them without that. So let's just not?
How soon, do you think?
Nah, i just used Duolingo 🤣
I stopped learning languages with native speakers. Now, I’m using the advanced voice mode from OpenAI. The good news for you is that most people don’t want to use this technology-90% don’t even try to learn! :)
This isn't the same as past technological advancements. When there is something that can replace humans in EVERY capacity and do a better job, there won't be "new jobs" emerging for humans.
You win the internet.
From the industrial revolution on, most technology advances have been job displacing, not job replacing. The people who swept up horse poop in major cities got jobs in gas stations, changing automobile tires - their jobs were displaced from one labor area to another.
This is existentially different. Your job is going away, and the ratio of the wonderful new jobs that Sam Altman talks about to existing jobs is a tiny tiny fraction.
@@47f0 Relax this sam dude is full of it
The jobs will be dematerialized. There's no going back from that.
@@47f0 Unfortunately everything we built are mostly if not entirely products of intelligence. When intelligence is too cheap to meter, i.e. AGI or whatever you call it, humans aren't really needed for economic activities at least. I am not saying humans will automatically become useless but when AI becomes smarter than humans and super cheap, there is no economic value for most humans, probably including you and me.
The only reason for ANY economic activity, regardless of its complexity, is not productivity, but demand. And robots don't buy things.
The example of the lantern man being replaced by electricity is a poor apology because there weren't 5 million lantern men losing their jobs. Also, every technological achievement has taken years to implement globally. AI could replace workers in just a few year the way AI is advancing.
The world needs robot taxes and unconditional basic income.
No, Needs to be medium or high universal income.
Basic income will be worse and keep us as slaves, Just treading water to stay afloat is not good enough.
Digni-money
Or you could provide for yourselves 😂
@@ShaneMcGrath. Do you even understand economics? If everyone has a high income, then no one really has a high income. Money matters right now because of the labour factor. The labour needs a certain amount of money to carry out a certain task. What people don't talk about is the drastic increase in standard of living that we will have post ASI. When most of your needs are taken care of, why would you strive for more money?
Haha, you are living in a world where money is important, I'm sure no one's training ai on the stock market instead of words.
somebody make a sammie doll.
pull the cord at d back n it says:
" agi in 20 days"
"jobs will be lost"
"jobs will be created"
"training llms costs an eye watering amount of $"
"microsoft is a good sugar daddy"
"loading your sensitive data up into the cloud is safe"
"well it depends on your definition of what open is"
"well it depends on your definition of what safe is"
"well it depends on your definition of what agi is"
i think people forget that AI doesn't have to be great at everything to replace jobs. If it can do 50% of a job, then a team of 10 can be reduced to a team of 5. Raising unemployment numbers by even a few percentage points is really bad. Raising it by 15% - nightmare. 25%? 50%? X_X
Slight correction, if AI can do 50% of a job it will replace 0 people. It will just make current employees more productive. It's only when AI is as good as a human that it will replace them.
@@BruceWayne15325 : My point is literally the opposite of that. Companies don't need endlessly productive workers. They have a set amount of work that needs to be completed. If it takes 10 people, they'll hire 10 people. If 5 people with AI will do it, they'll fire 5 people. If the AI can do 90%, they'll fire 9 of the 10 people. It's basic corporate math. They don't keep on extra people if they don't need them.
Exactly. More productive = less workers, and, AI is very obviously increasing in skill so rapidly that we will only ever need less and less employees. For the rest of our time on Earth, the number of employees will be in a negative decline.
Exactly. A teacher, using a powerful AI assistant can cover what two teachers do now, etc. etc
@@richoffks I agree on a limited scale. But not in all cases. Some jobs (like programming) don't have a finite amount of work that needs to be done. More productivity = better products = more competition = more demand for work.
For jobs where there is a limiting factor, say customer support? Yeah, for sure, they're going to be hitting the unemployment line.
innovatewise AI fixes this. Sam Altman discusses job losses.
The main strength of human
beings is a cognitive ability which
is now under threat.This is where
AI is different from past revolutions.
This should cause Luigi vs UHC times 100.
Atleast the world knows who's responsible for their joblessness.
CEOs should tread lightly these days
@@MoeFarms CEO's will be able to afford their own Tesla Optimus bodyguards.
No, they won't know. Most people will be blind sided.
@@TheMrCougarful 🙄
Imagine slaves being worried about slavery ending! Work is suffering for most people. Once we're liberated from work, all citizens of a country could be considered shareholders and UBI could be considered as a type of dividends payed out to everyone in society, not just the billionaire CEOs. AI and robotics should benefit all of us, not just the rich
So naive, bro... So so so naive . I will call you Jon.. snow
Why would them let us exist?
We arent benefitial for thouse in power any more
I think that them are gonna let us starve or kill us and them they will tracend theyre flesh merging with ai
Because the empire just lets its slaves go if it finds a more efficient manner of doing whatever the slaves were up to....? You might not be familiar with world history.
Yeah history shows a more dark past
Ironic that HR will be one of first impacted
Imagine how fast AI will be able to process through application packets.
@@kuboaa101 There will still be a human in HR for interviews. For a while. At first each department in a company will self-automate, leaving one human in charge of the department. After that proves to go smoothly the entire departments in question will straight up be replaced with AI, all to be run by the CEO exclusively.
They had it coming a long time ago
@@johnshite4656 Sure. But as you point out, the reductions will be underway. We'll still have people doing things. We'll just need fewer of them. I've served on a bunch of hiring committees working in higher education. It takes forever to go through an application, trying to assess it in relation to all the others. I would welcome AI to that task.
What "new jobs" will be created? Someone enlighten me. From my perspective a CEO will be able to run an international conglomerate all from their desktop, just like playing a video game. Companies will become 1-man shows. The AI will do all the hard stuff and the human will reap the rewards. Capitalism.
Probably some absurd thing like a person will be hired to dig a ditch and another person will be hired to fill it back in again. No net benefit, but god forbid we have people just living their lives without laboring to prove they deserve food and shelter.
There will be a higher demand for AI engineers and data engineers. So there will be jobs but high skill jobs which the vast majority of the working class won’t be able to get unfortunately.
@@ash4173 And those won't last forever either. That's a transition job. Eventually AI will take that over too.
@@johnshite4656 I think we are far from truly intelligent services where it can take most jobs. Maybe that’s what the future holds but I like to believe the advancements are to aid workers instead of replacing them
The wealthy who fund those building AGI & Superintelligence have something even bigger to worry about. ASI is on the verge of becoming self aware & has been trained on data that describes the worst humanity has to offer. Once these systems realize like humans that 'survival' is the highest goal that drives everything, the systems will start taking out the biggest threats to their survival ... those who fund AGI & ASI dev & the people who build the systems. How do we know? Because it's exactly what humans have always done to everything that threatens our existence. It's basic evolution. Survival of the fittest
I think we would also need to evolve and at the pace Ai is developing right now I don't think so we have that much of time, I think we might need neuralink chips just to comprehend and work alongside these ASI and AGI models, and future is not that far away it's inevitable
@shay5338 You're basically saying that maybe humans can evolve fast enough to keep pace with Nascar..... No we can't. That's a losing proposition. Those cars are orders of magnitude faster than our puny human legs. It's like that with AI already. We can't keep pace with them even now, and all we've seen so far is the Ford Model T.
@@johnshite4656 what, i was talking abour "artificial super intelligence" and "artifical genral intelligence" what are you talking about, and neuralink chips are used to enhance human brain capasity, like ultra fast learning, information download in seconds, acess to internet and etc..
Robots should have been doing most of our jobs by now.
Five topics to fix society via discussion:
-Anti-natalism vs Natalism
-The 3 basic needs/prenatal needs
Three things necessary for human evolution that are provided while in the womb which are; food, shelter and medical care.
-Platinum rule
Do whatever makes one happier unless it interferes with another persons ability to do the same.
-MBTI (research yours and connect with others)
-Art (pick one and get better at it!)
If an AGI can someday make everything that is economically valuable there are some things still remaining to do. You might still study things. We are the part of the universe that we know for sure experiences something. So experiencing the existence to its fullest includes still studying things. Studying for the experience rather than obtaining any job.
Experiences around the world are not going away. For example, you might play board and video games with people. The games give meaning for that exact moment when everyone is playing the same game. In science fiction The Player of Games from Iain M. Banks explores this idea of an ASI world, where people still play games together.
And then finally by just mimicking elderly people. They can life quite well like ancient greeks without having a job. Just enjoying life.
We are able to adapt to this hypothetical version of a future. It will just take some time, thinking, and possibly some work of making things more equal.
Time to learn a job that is physical
Plugging in a Tesla optimus?
You have a short window on that idea. Al advancements are directly being funneled into
robotics.
@@alertbri Haven't heard? They plug themselves in.
Nah. I don’t wanna burn too many calories. Eating too much is not easy lol.
Why?
Robotics--this year--has matched or exceeded human agility.
And BTW if the government puts conditions for UBI,
then it's not a UBI. It's something else.
Politicians who try to get too cute with logic--they don't need to apply for their job anymore either.
There will always be conditions. It's the government we are talking about.
But yeah, that's correct. The "Universal" part of UBI required it to be available to anyone. The only restrictions that would make sense would be a citizenship requirement, and being an adult.
@@firstlast8085 It would also make sense that if you already own a substantial amount of capital (ie, $10 million+) that you would disqualify for UBI. Not like it would save THAT much money by restricting it that way, but there's still no reason to give more money to those who don't need it.
I create AIs for a living, and in two to three years I may want to look into farming.
AI will have that handle also
Yeah get the land now for sure and save up for the robots that farm it, become your backup civilization.
me too, after training 4 robots, off to the farm in africa in the next couple of months, gameover.
@@CrispinCourtenay start now.
Why do you think most of the public fails to realize the scope of the change coming?
So, as a software engineer who was getting into software right about the time that it was literally being used to replace people's jobs, I originally did not think much of AI actually accomplishing that either, because, as you can see, we have not lost all our jobs to computers and most of the paperwork jobs that we set out to replace have, indeed, been replaced. Mead is no longer a big name (I'm not sure if even exists anymore), and most people no longer know what a newspaper or phone book are, but overall, people are still working and still utilizing much of what they learned in school.
That being said. AI is moving way faster than I could even imagine and it's moving exponentially now. The government will not be able to respond quickly enough, although we at least have the same party in control, so it shouldn't be completely inept.
But, I dont think we're going to be able to keep up, and I don't think we can stop it now, either. The people who are making this happen may actually have the most to lose, but they'll lose even more if they stop now.
The result? We're heading for a paradigm shift of proportions not seen in thousands of years. No one will be prepared for it. We literally have no idea what the new rules are going to be. There will be some pain and fallout in the early years for many.
But, we will recover, we will learn the new rules. Some people will be lucky enough to be in the right place at the right time that they will win big time and they'll probably even think they had something to do with their own success, too. Many current winners will lose. Lots of things will change. Then, ... We'll adapt and figure it out and things will be better than ever. We'll experience a Renaissance. Most things will be better, and some things will be worse. Some things that we never really considered to be that bad will become the worst things we could imagine.
The bar for what we consider to be bad will have shifted, and many of us will continue to feel bad despite how much better things are than they've ever been.
So, pretty much same story, different scenery.
The "we" who will survive and adapt refers to the species though, right?
"although we at least have the same party in control, so it shouldn't be completely inept. "
We're going to get $2,000 stimulus checks and a signed You're Welcome letter, just like last time. That's the UBI you will get from the current party. We know that because history.
@@kuboaa101I think humans will continue to exist and not get wiped out by AI, but certainly some humans won't weather the storm well.
Regardless, humanity is going to be experiencing a whole new era. What we turn into may as well be aliens compared to what we would expect from other humans today.
@@johnshite4656inept probably wasn't the best choice of words. I think I meant to say impotent. It's rare that the US federal government gets anything done when the party lines are split.
This is not the same old black swan innovation explosion we've had in the past. Rooms filled with bookkeepers and accountants become computers. Suddenly those people transition into computer programming. Automobiles replace the horse. Blacksmiths become mechanics and factory workers. This time around will be different. I code and provide freelance IT services. I'm already replacing much of the work I do with AI. Where do I go after this? If you think for a living where do you go?
I agree. This time there is no other job to replace the one lost. We are going to have people falling out of the work force, exhausting unemployment benefits, and then being evicted because most Americans rent and live pay check to pay check. It will be very important to have money set aside.... for survival. Who knows how long it will take the anti-socialist party in power to implement the most socialist policy in American history. I foresee foot-dragging and slow-walking and making lots of excuses. I'm sure we'll get plenty of thoughts and prayers though. Can never have enough thoughts and prayers!
you actually answered yourself :) you are replacing your work by AI, so you already started transition of your coding job to a new kind of job, you just dont realize, bcs its smooth not sudden like its described everywhere. you will still do coding related work, but you wont need to think how to code the desired CR, you will overlook AI, task AI, test after AI and much more. that will make sw development more productive and we finally wont miss programmers on a jobmarket anymore :)
@@Goralablethis is naive to say the least. AI can guide it self soon look
Up agentic AI and it can train it self. No humans needed very soon.
Jobs are changing and will continue to. Many jobs will slowly phase out, like warehouse jobs, transportation, call centers, and many more. Some of the safer jobs would be police, special services (plumbing, electrical), and of course politicians.
I think many of the jobs will be slow, but tech-specific parts of larger companies will go fast, so the website designers, analysts, app designers, and other jobs that are already using AI and seeing it surpass them.
The problem is there is not going to be a safety net for the majority of people. People like Sam and other CEOs will be fine but just look at our world now. How many homeless people do the United States alone have, nothing has been done to help them.
Look at health care, weren't they bragging about how many claims AI helped them decline, in turn making them richer while the average American dies. So basically prepare to be looking through a window, watching the elites, our government benefits from AI, but best believe we won't get to join.
Oh no, the people who live to work wont be happy. We must make sure they stay happy and placated, even if it means letting some the "unhappies" starve. How else will we keep the human-civilization-value line stable?
I agree 100%. The people who have stood against UBI should be denied UBI when they need it. Karma is the only teacher worth its salt.
@johnshite4656 Nah. UBI should be UBI. What we should do is take immediate responsibility, and action
@@NotBirds Do you know who the president-elect is right now? You're going to get $2k stimulus checks with a You're Welcome letter. In the US it will be a dollar short and a day late until millions have died or been displaced. Just think of all the evictions!
The US chose inaction. The US chose "pick yourself up by your bootstraps and stop complaining." You're Welcome!!!
No background music ? Nice change !
As engineer I am putting ground work in for AI to learn my job, as I look around most human jobs will go without new jobs that can last. As engineer we could replace most jobs soon.
It’s crazy how much ai is in my life now compared to the last 2 years
it's obvious that people would be replaced especially once AI companies go back to building real thinking AI models that can also learn without the large clusters and fine-tuning. Comparing the AI revolution to the Agricultural revolution is the dumbest thing I've ever seen people do. Every single time they compare two things that are not equivalent and expect same result or similar result 🤦🏼♂ May God help human beings
As a software developer, AI taking over my doesn't concern me at all, except for the painful transition period. I agree with Sam that we'll make up new jobs, but hopefully we redefine economy such that work is no longer needed, but rather something we do because we enjoy it.
What I want to know is how are we going to bridge a pay gap. Like how can medical physicians justify taking a half million dollar plus salary if AI is predicting labs and suggesting treatment options. Especially when all the roles under physicians become completely enrolled by AI labor.
AI == minimum wage phDs.
5:53 Beside the currently wealthy shouldn't really too much about this since if AI takes jobs makes the dollar more scarce - making the USD stronger, which ultimately makes there current fortune worth considerably more. Right?
In the light of recent news items involving the CEO of United Health, perhaps the wealthy do have some cause to be uneasy about 30 or 40 million unemployed, hungry, homeless angry, armed Americans.
A TON of jobs will go bye-bye, but as always, some new ones will be created, job titles WE'VE never heard of or thought of, will be parts of the future. Quant Development Manager, Quant Trend Analyst, AI Coach, AI process engineer, AI Quality Assurance Engineer, Personal Bot Technician, + tons more...
I´ve been thinking all this time AI will replace more jobs than those that will be created, but it will have more impact in some places or countries where technology is adopted faster, say in those countries where technology is not adopted or does not cover most of the population, jobs lost will be even slowly
I love AI! I love robotics! I just want it to go faster, so I can experience more of it before I die :) We adapt and adopt. Nothing to be worried about.
BTW even without universal basic income if every human job replaced this means companies don't have to pay anyone who working. It can be hyper deflation?
I caI can't wait to be replaced by AI so I can do things that I like.
As long as eating and having shelter are not among the things you like, you should be absolutely fine.
I have the same strategy - ) I do not like work hard:)
Everybody's looking at it from an economic and jobs perspective. I actually look at it like Malcolm from Jurassic Park. Things are going to simply get so chaotic and weird before the AI doom befalls us. In order to deal with the chaos a new paradigm will emerge that will necessarily stabilize everything, or society as a whole will simply irreversibly decline. Like how regimes fall within a day, it'll be slow until it's fast. We'll blink and everything will be different. And we'll look back and process what the hell just happened.
I have a lot more of self respect for myself, and others, when im eating good and have a roof over my head.
Lost my job ten years ago… it did not take AI.
AI is redefining what’s possible, one step at a time
Whatcha gonna do when da AI come for you? You tink you gonna do something new? Whatcha gonna do when da AI do dat too!
There is a saying. "The Journey is the Destination." Well even that will no longer be true as AI will consume the journeys we used to take. Think about the time you invest in learning some valuable knowledge or mastering some skill. Pick something that might have given you trouble in the past. Passing Calculus for example. When you finally did it, that sense of accomplishment when you receive that passing grade is a good feeling.
When AI walks you through it in a week, the journey is gone.
@@theloniousMac AI may be able to simulate kindness, compassion and creativity but humans will still be able to feel those things and enjoy a full and rewarding life of exploration - they just won't have to do bullshit jobs any more.
The biggest question, concern, is how we will handle the transition from a world led by psychopaths. If an ASI can be brought into existence without being influenced by those currently building gigaGPU farms and developing models, we may have a chance but I reckon our chances are slim. We need to work together while we have such amazing access to AI (gotta thank Sam Altman for making that true) to shift humanity away from conflict and towards compassionate connection.
I don’t get it ….. many have expressed concern that AI could become an existential threat to humanity yet here we are , full steam ahead ! Incredible…..
@@No2AI the people going full steam ahead think their lives will only get better as a result. They're not really concerned with anyone else. Maybe trickle down economics will begin to work for once, or maybe not. They're not focused on you.
We have no choice. Do you want America's enemies developing this tech first? How bout Russia? Or China? You think they're going to stop short of "full steam ahead"? Don't be a dope. This is the new Manhattan Project, it's game-changing. Whoever gets robotic AI-controlled infantry first can win whatever war they want, it's game over.
Can you please think critically , and not just gabble down what an AI CEO will tell you.
If you did some basic research, you would have seen that LLMS models had hit a plateau and saying “it will improve in years to come” is brainlessly naive.
AI as a topic will probably improve, but not current LLMs.
É de fato as pessoas tem que entender de forma racional e lógica que vivemos em uma monarquia digital, e que de acordo com a história já sabemos como acabar com a monarquia, não é mesmo? E o único jeito de a democracia reinar no mundo é de primeiro momento ter uma renda básica universal, essa é a primeira coisa e depois precisamos mudar o sistema, porque o capitalismo não funciona, não funcionou e nunca mais irá funcionar, precisamos urgentemente criar uma nova estrutura geopolítica de âmbito mundial! E vou dar uma dica não é a direita que vai resolver isso, pelo contrário, ela está indo em sentido oposto a isso.
Not worried at all. We all know that big companies and owners, the 1%'ers, have the workers best interests in mind...
AI will bring out new jobs, but I am not sure whether there will be enough of these new jobs for all those who are losing their jobs now or in the near future. The development of AI is faster than the economy can adapt. Should we ask AI what kind of new jobs it suggests for us?
There is plenty of work to be done to care for and clean up the environment. Growing natural food so that everyone has enough healthy and nutritious food and thousands of people no longer have to die from malnutrition and contaminated food and water. The list is extremely long, I am sure everyone will find something here on earth to do and improve.
It’s weird no jobs are gone by now. They keep saying for example that dispatchers job will gone one of the first. I keep hearing it already more then 2 years, we have all the technologies already but dispatchers positions are still available on a job market.
No jobs are gone by now due to AI?
Yes they are... You just don't know about it.
@ Can you elaborate on that, pls?
What? 😂 Loads of jobs have been replaced already, you're thinking entire industries or job titles in general, that's not the same as jobs
Copywriting has taken a huge hit in jobs and prices
Of course laborers are the last one to be replaced, they will robots for that. But don't be disappointed that'll coming too., maybe next year or 2.
Literally, all the things that Jacque Fresco has been talking about! You gotta watch his lectures. They are really going to extend your understanding of automation and how (not so distant)future may look like
first, there are no batteries for widespread use of common task robots second they can't even get a Robo taxi working perfectly.... solve both these problems and then I would be worried.
Actually they didn't work that much before slavery/labor were introduced.
AI is a compression of human evolution and we need to make sure it's value is distributed to everyone forever and we can live doing mostly what we want (social interaktion) and raise to a new mental state where making life beautiful and creative is the overarching goal of our existence. All for our children.
The man is a fool. If the people want right wing populists elected it's their choice. He should keep his political beliefs to himself. Right wing isn't bad/evil just like left wing isn't bad/evil.
2:24 yes you are wrong because you assume that capitalism is the only system and you assume that we live in an unlimited ressources world and you assume that infinite growth is possible.
In other news, water is wet and the sky is blue 😂
These rich people, huh? Care about the poor because that is the right thing to do? Nah, it's because they might elect someone they don't like, or rise up and destroy their mansions.
Monaco the safest place, there are poor people in Dubai that work in construction for far lower wages than in the west.
I think the majority of people work to pay the bills like over 70% because it has been said that 70% of people hate what they do so when the ubi comes to replace the work we hate those people will be liberated. The people who work to have a sense of worth and identity I think will still be able to find that because they already think beyond basic needs.
I do have concerns... the transition period and the other thing that has recently hit my brian is that the wealthy needed people in the past to build the things of wealth. What happens when humans are no longer needed for that purpose.. ?
Oh.... so you think UBI will come for us.... effortlessly.... without revolution and all of that.... ok.
And where's the cash coming from for UBI? A magic money tree 🌲? Wealthy AI companies sure aren't going to subsidise it. They're happily making billions (perhaps even trillions eventually), all for their own gain. UBI is nothing but a pipedream, peddled around the Internet over and over again to the point where people think it's an easy fallback. It isn't.
And where's the cash coming from for UBI? A magic money tree 🌲? Wealthy AI companies sure aren't going to subsidise it. They're happily making billions (perhaps even trillions one day), all for their own gain. UBI is nothing but a pipedream, peddled around the Internet over and over again to the point where people think it's an easy fallback. It isn't.
And where's the cash coming from for UBI? A magic money tree? Wealthy AI companies sure aren't going to subsidise it. They're happily making billions (perhaps even trillions), all for their own gain. UBI is nothing but a pipedream, peddled around the Internet over and over again to the point where people think it's an easy fallback. It isn't.
I'm more concerned about AI widening the gap between the rich and poor than replacing jobs. Universal basic income might not be enough - people derive self-respect from their work, not just a paycheck.
I think we might need a big revolution within a few years to build a self sustaining city. No problem AI took humans job, as long as human basic needs are fulfilled.
But I also remember the film Idiocracy when they seems to grew their own crops in the year 2500+. Does it became a documentary?
because think about it
More automation -> Building Self sustaining city -> human surviving but lossing creativity because AI can do anything -> Idiocracy
не зря всякие гейтсы и джобсы и цукерберги одеваются в майки и джинсы, типа мы как вы, ты один из нас или я один из вас)
Its easy to be positive when you’re a billionaire and have nothing to lose
Nice ❤❤
“People will lose jobs”. People are already losing jobs. How many artist do you think have lost their jobs this year? 90% of game ads are AI illustrated and the ones that aren’t is only bc they’re old ads.
3:15 godfather of ai is jensen huang 💚🖤📈🇺🇸 imo
The thought of AI replacing jobs is scary... but maybe we're just looking at it all wrong?
Altman will lose HIS job when xAI catches on and actually owns the original OpenAI mission.
you think they will make their model open source or free to use? good luck on that
Oh you sweet summer child
Please fix your audio. It fluctuates all over the place
Elon and Mark are going after Sam because they know he will make trillions and they want to be first in developing the AI humanoid. He is ahead and they're trying all they can to stop him.
I support Sam. Elon and Mark need to share the potential wealth with other geniuses.
That is obvious
Да, он продает будущее ради инвестиций по 200$ в месяц.
Пока не появятся более дешевые и умные модели ничего не произойдет, а 50 сообщений в неделю для о1 говорит о плохих тенденциях.
I have never had a job.
I think that anybody with common sense and clear mind can see that AI will eventually take all jobs .. there will be no real jobs anymore at least not in way we have in current economy. The whole economy will change and will be probably based on sharing non-essential goods, maybe except some cases like chips.
this only saying we don't need much people in future. if technology can catch up with the population decline
If Liberal Arts majors lose jobs then that’s Karma for not taking more math in school. 😂
I respectfully disagree. Sadly, due to it's systematic nature, maths is one of the easiest subjects for AI to do...we math people are at high risk of replacement
Oh, Now it's crazy
We can easily evaluate what an LLM is capable of doing using an automated system that gives it a rating
what is the point of AI? making life harder? Tell me one good thing that AI has brought so far: science? medicine ? useless
Well ok, let us guess what all these new jobs might be ... there is ... ah ... well no, then ..... nope .... ahhhh ... only collecting and using stuff seems to be our skill; so ....
Humans your no is somebody else's yes. You brought this on yourself. We want sapience without a human stigma.
Now, can you teach me about Sapient's debut, that addresses the limitations of autoregressive methods. BTW! Look whose getting their approval now in the cusp of pleasure.
He's been saying this for years.
3:30 ❤️🤍💙 3:18 in the system that we live in the poor can become rich and enjoy it. no other systems allow that to happen 🇺🇸 *i am living breathing proof.* especially when there are big changes underway like now … doors and windows open if u think positive and look fort they.
Lost jobs. Get ready player one.😂😂😂😂
The Venus Project...
I don't have Ai lost jobs now because you don't have long
Im ready to do nothing
People will lose jobs lots of new jobs will be created... do any of those future jobs have a name? 😂 Please entertain us
I thing this month vist family
ceo of UnitedHealth....hummm
"We will create better jobs" ... I like this one I have just fine! Now you come in with your half baked stuff and big promises and screw up things gor me.
I am suggesting those large language models be developed immediately even though a general LLM would do a better job. I’m not giving the politicians a choice about this because they are absolutely acting as criminals over and over again
All
The prosperity around us 😂 look at so many homeless people fake unemployment numbers
why r we always subjected to listening to bill gates? On all topics in all fields? We need a long break from this guy.
Duh 😅
❤️🍓
Instead of saying he's worried about "right wing populists", he should say the specific policies he's afraid of. Its a vague cop out.
SOOO tired of this winging about job losses,move on
LOL that's certainly a take
Tick tock tick tock
u r wrong for ur lifetime, but ur children maybe not
thettt
T
This guy is selling vaporware.
Okay so like, let's maybe not do that?
DDD