Introductory Uniformly Accelerated Motion Problem - A Braking Bicycle

Поділитися
Вставка
  • Опубліковано 24 гру 2024

КОМЕНТАРІ • 21

  • @ManuelThomasMusic
    @ManuelThomasMusic 11 років тому +21

    these videos deserve so much more views and likes. amazing job

    • @procrastmh
      @procrastmh 8 років тому +2

      I'm thinking the same thing. This channel should have more subscribers

  • @lee-em5qw
    @lee-em5qw 3 роки тому +1

    thank you so much, sir. your short videos helped me understand what my teacher can't explain properly for an hour

  • @teesanders3217
    @teesanders3217 10 місяців тому

    I finally understand how to look at a UAM problem and work it on my own due to this lesson. Thank you very much.

  • @ElissaLee1
    @ElissaLee1 3 роки тому +2

    The rule here is: use known values as more as possible. DO NOT use intermediate values unless you have no choice. So for the problem (a), acceleration is unknown. We need to use the equation with a and other known conditions. That is we need to find out which equation has a, delta x, t, and Vi? Clearly it is: delta x = Vi*t + 1/2*a*t^2. For problem (b), Mr. P said there are 3 ways to solve Vf. But there is actually only one way to do it correctly without rounding problem. It is the last equation, delta X = 1/2*(Vf+Vi)*t. You don't need the answer from (a) to solve (b) and it is more accurate.

  • @eoo37
    @eoo37 6 років тому +6

    I used unrounded answer! By the way, I haven't seen a video in quite some time...After graduation, I was so busy😭I wanna study physics comfortably some day....

    • @FlippingPhysics
      @FlippingPhysics  6 років тому +3

      It is good to have you back. I hope you can keep learning physics.

  • @Phymacss
    @Phymacss Рік тому

    That was really helpful! Is there a video that explains or derives the equations?

    • @FlippingPhysics
      @FlippingPhysics  Рік тому

      I have these two:
      www.flippingphysics.com/uam-derivative.html
      www.flippingphysics.com/kinematic-equation-derivations.html

    • @Phymacss
      @Phymacss Рік тому

      @@FlippingPhysics Thank you!!

  • @AnExtrovertedArtist
    @AnExtrovertedArtist Рік тому

    9 yrs later your still helping a G9 student

  • @physicsmostafa1774
    @physicsmostafa1774 3 роки тому

    at 5:29 is it ok?,
    to subtract speed from distance?

    • @carultch
      @carultch 3 роки тому

      No, because they have different units. If the units are inconsistent, the equation is not valid.
      In this case, the equation shows displacement minus (velocity * time). Multiplication takes precedence over addition and subtraction, so it is implied that you first multiply velocity with time, before subtracting it from displacement .

  • @bibirdyj3
    @bibirdyj3 11 років тому

    These are awesome dude! NICE job!

  • @izzybw7861
    @izzybw7861 3 роки тому

    i used the unrounded answer for all the decimal (starting with 6.3611) which gave me a= -4.801407 and my Vf was 1.4325955 so im just confused if this is wrong or if its just different bc you used the rounded number from the beginning? the lesson itself is rlly helpful tho so thank u

  • @RishabhSingh-vf5xu
    @RishabhSingh-vf5xu 6 років тому

    Awsm....

  • @MrNoway20
    @MrNoway20 11 років тому

    thx

  • @BingBangBrine
    @BingBangBrine 4 роки тому

    flipping phyiscs!!

  • @HowFoolish
    @HowFoolish 4 роки тому +1

    mmmmm shallow and pedantic

  • @captainobvious7153
    @captainobvious7153 3 роки тому

    Bro, what.