NASA Scientist's Propellantless Thrust Breakthrough - The Key to UAP Propulsion?

Поділитися
Вставка
  • Опубліковано 10 чер 2024
  • Dive into the forefront of physics with Dr. Charles Buhler as he unveils a groundbreaking discovery: propellantless propulsion. Join host Chris Lehto as he explores the implications of this technology, from revolutionizing space travel to potentially explaining mysterious aerial phenomena.
    Thanks for watching, liking, and subscribing! It really helps the channel.
    Support the channel and get exclusive content at
    / chrislehto
    Join this channel on UA-cam to get access to the perks:
    / @chrislehtof16
    Join the UAP Society Discord here:
    / discord
    Follow Chris on Twitter:
    @ChrisOtis78
    Lehto Files is now on Instagram:
    / reels
    Invest in UAP Society NFTs!
    Each UAPSociety NFT grants early/ad-free access to all LehtoFiles videos-
    opensea.io/collection/uapeez
    Donate eth to:
    chrislehto.eth
    full ETH address is
    0x26E3c9b2A5E5b6B7FB54f5F0120B0E4840EB7B24
    Try out my Streamyard affiliate link below for a discount
    I use Streamyard for the majority of my videos, it is like a pro zoom
    streamyard.com/pal/c/54135175...
    Links in the video:
    The Debrief Article
    thedebrief.org/nasa-veterans-...
    Dr Buhler on Tim Ventura
    • Charles Buhler - Prope...
    Charles Buhler Patent
    patents.google.com/patent/US1...
    Video Chapters
    00:00 New Force of Propellentless Thrust
    4:44 1 G Thrust breakthrough
    9:44 The Patent-asymmetric force
    13:07 La Guardia UAP
  • Розваги

КОМЕНТАРІ • 1 тис.

  • @whisthpo
    @whisthpo Місяць тому +147

    Discovered or Disclosed Chris?

    • @ChrisLehtoF16
      @ChrisLehtoF16  Місяць тому +17

      Discovered?

    • @armwrestlerjeff
      @armwrestlerjeff Місяць тому +13

      Lol a possibility 😂

    • @Truthseeker9393
      @Truthseeker9393 Місяць тому +4

      Definitely

    • @kennymcewan7281
      @kennymcewan7281 Місяць тому

      Disclosure they have know this for years ass holes

    • @VRBug
      @VRBug Місяць тому

      Disclosed, leak to NASA, told to say they discovered it now any UAP sightings will be “oh we are testing the new propulsion system, it’s all us, what aliens? Case closed”

  • @status5-withchriscelentano199
    @status5-withchriscelentano199 Місяць тому +64

    The fact that he is doing this with less voltage than T Townsend Brown is significant in its own right. Phenomenal progress for our species. I salute him and his team.

    • @RandyHill-bj9pc
      @RandyHill-bj9pc Місяць тому +4

      Isn't that just a clear sign its a scam? I mean that, the lack of peer review, the claims that violate the basic laws of physics, AND this claim it's using almost no power.

    • @justin8894
      @justin8894 Місяць тому +3

      Is it AC or DC? ⚡️ 🔋 🔌

    • @RandyHill-bj9pc
      @RandyHill-bj9pc Місяць тому +4

      @@justin8894 Its MC. Magical Current.

    • @zoltanszabados8445
      @zoltanszabados8445 Місяць тому +6

      Wait…this hasn’t been peer reviewed? That’s not a good sign.

    • @nutbastard
      @nutbastard Місяць тому

      I'm not defending the man in the video, but talking about power in volts instead of watts raises many flags. Voltage is a nothing figure on its own.

  • @DaveEtchells
    @DaveEtchells Місяць тому +49

    A pedantic but important point: 1G is an acceleration, not a force. It’s remarkable that he got any thrust at all, but the actual thrust in terms of lb-force or kg-force are what ultimately matters. It sounds like he got 30 grams of force which is amazing, but it detracts from the presentation, hearing 1G referred to as a force.

    • @citizenblue
      @citizenblue Місяць тому +6

      💯. Why aren't we using Newtons, or pounds at least.

    • @RandyHill-bj9pc
      @RandyHill-bj9pc Місяць тому +20

      30 grams of force is so enormous its your most obvious clue that this is a scam. 1 gram of force would be enough for his Nobel Prize, I mean if he would submit for peer review which we know he'll never do as it will expose his grift.

    • @philjimmybob5650
      @philjimmybob5650 Місяць тому +9

      doesn't sound legit to me.

    • @RexAnothership
      @RexAnothership Місяць тому +5

      Ultimately the apparatus was able to make a 1 G acceleration in order to overcome gravity or else its like another ion thruster that weights 200 lbs and produces 4 grams thrust which can't overcome gravity. There are more effective strategies that can produce 100s of tons of force in a apparatus the size of a fighter jet engine. Point of fact, if you produce a 1 G constant acceleration for 365 days you would be at velocity C.

    • @larryscott3982
      @larryscott3982 Місяць тому +13

      Yeah very questionable use of terms which convey nothing about performance. I’m not buying it. Discovering a new fundamental force is an assertion that requires far more information than this.

  • @TheRealVenom87
    @TheRealVenom87 Місяць тому +15

    I just wanted to stop by and thank you again Chris for what you do and sticking with it.this subject is very mentally taxing and we are so very grateful for you keeping us up to date.

  • @wikkid1show569
    @wikkid1show569 Місяць тому +40

    I also wanted to share, that this very same field was studied back in the 1920s . It's not new but the better tech and materials is why this is making progress.

    • @peggygilmour8905
      @peggygilmour8905 Місяць тому +1

      In SF, electrostatic force on a starship can be used as a weapon.

    • @ZionistWorldOrder
      @ZionistWorldOrder Місяць тому +5

      Thomas Townsend Browns work, he says so himself

    • @Tubemanjac
      @Tubemanjac Місяць тому

      @@peggygilmour8905 Oh yeah, let's not forget making war. 😞

    • @ultuma
      @ultuma Місяць тому +2

      That's right, and nothing in theory is newly discovered.

    • @MichaelWinter-ss6lx
      @MichaelWinter-ss6lx Місяць тому

      I also know of a 120 year old UFO tech, where I'm still waiting on material science to make it possible. A warp field with a minimum of (positiv(!)) energy.

  • @SirPaulMuaddib
    @SirPaulMuaddib Місяць тому +39

    Whether this is a reproducible thing or not is not the issue.
    This kind of thing should be on the front page of every scientific journal...
    So that they can look at it, and understand it, do their experiments...etc..
    Not bury our heads in the sand and say it doesn't exist.

    • @theyreoutthere.huntinggear
      @theyreoutthere.huntinggear Місяць тому +2

      Right. We could have had floating cars and speeder bikes by now

    • @RandyHill-bj9pc
      @RandyHill-bj9pc Місяць тому

      Its not reproducible because its clearly a scam. Our "laws" of physics are actually models built through hundreds of years of testing, and it violates all of them. His explanation is gobbledegook, you can't exert electrostatic "pressure" against a vacuum because the electrostatic force is only created by electrons and protons exchanging virtual particles. Without particles you are "pushing" against or "pulling" from there is no force, as thousands of experiments over hundreds of years demonstrates

    • @GettheFouttahere74
      @GettheFouttahere74 Місяць тому +1

      The military industrial complex has that suppressed for obvious reasons

    • @RandyHill-bj9pc
      @RandyHill-bj9pc Місяць тому

      He doesn't want it peer reviewed, because it would expose his scam. There isn't a physicist on the planet who can't debunk his ludicrous claims within 30 seconds, given how well the electrostatic force has been tested and that he's claiming to violate the laws of conservation of energy and momentum.

    • @johnassal5838
      @johnassal5838 27 днів тому +1

      Whatever else you believe this being reproducible is actually the most important thing. Otherwise it's only an unconfirmed rumor. Ironically it sounds as if this could be a major advance, if true, even if it's not reactionless. So called lifters are mostly just a curiosity due to limitations imposed by a not very aerodynamic electrode grid and low efficiency. Even if the only difference here is more efficient thrust and getting it without a grid you could still see a revolution in aerospace.

  • @SirPaulMuaddib
    @SirPaulMuaddib Місяць тому +66

    Mr Lehto is not afraid to go there.
    Congrats on finding out about this and covering this story.

    • @sitbone3
      @sitbone3 Місяць тому

      okay fan girl.

    • @RandyHill-bj9pc
      @RandyHill-bj9pc Місяць тому +1

      Mr Lehto is not afraid to be scammed, he's the most gullible youtuber out there.

  • @e99783
    @e99783 Місяць тому +35

    I’ll believe it when I see it actually work

    • @CrypticRite
      @CrypticRite 19 днів тому

      Wanna sandwich while you wait?

  • @ToddJambon
    @ToddJambon Місяць тому +40

    I hope the team that made this watches their backs. People who make things that could potentially obsolete traditional energy have a bad history of not living long.

    • @hugh_jasso
      @hugh_jasso Місяць тому +3

      Name one.

    • @MrWIbackpacker
      @MrWIbackpacker 29 днів тому +4

      We are, fortunately, getting to a critical mass of awareness. The public is paying attention now.

    • @NightRunner417
      @NightRunner417 25 днів тому

      Let's not forget that many if not most of those were con artists just trying to pull a fast one for a quick buck on grants and donations. They either got busted and had to give it up or ran away when it became obvious they were about to get it. Second thing is, the very idea that shady spooks are going around stopping everyone with a brain is absolutely ridiculous. You're seriously expecting that level of efficiency from people that can't even get their own sht straight? Also, EIGHT BILLION PEOPLE! *EIGHT BILLION* Show me ONE organization anywhere that can efficiently control the efforts of a hundred people let alone BILLIONS. You're letting your lust for conspiracy theory cloud your ability to recognize the inherent chaos and inability to coordinate that rules the human species at all levels.

    • @delphicdescant
      @delphicdescant 25 днів тому +5

      They also have a bad history of being con artists. Especially when their "breakthrough" relies on a purely geometrical solution.
      Let's hope one of these days there will be a real one.

    • @ToddJambon
      @ToddJambon 25 днів тому

      @@delphicdescant it's a Fed!

  • @angeldump1three
    @angeldump1three Місяць тому +14

    Yes, I want my hover board NOW!

  • @davidrobbins4857
    @davidrobbins4857 21 день тому +3

    Paul LaViolette wrote a book, twenty years ago called The Secrets of Anti-Gravity propulsion, he gives you the history of asymmetrical capacitance and its development, as well as a wealth of other oddities. I don't believe he got the credit he deserves, this story is a pat on the back for Paul.

  • @mrwhat5094
    @mrwhat5094 Місяць тому +16

    Curious how this idea of making a offset gravitational current reminds me of how many UAP have been reported flipping onto the side when taking off...

  • @dianerios880
    @dianerios880 Місяць тому +48

    Incredible!!!! So excited! Hey I had a thought about why the UAPs are showing themselves more now - maybe they are trying to show us this exact technology IS possible, to get us off fossil fuels, etc. that seems to be their biggest message, to take better care of the earth.

    • @ChrisLehtoF16
      @ChrisLehtoF16  Місяць тому +8

      It is an amazing discovery. I hope it scales like they think it will

    • @notyouraveragegoldenpotato
      @notyouraveragegoldenpotato Місяць тому +3

      They float around and get very occasionally glimpsed for a short blurry clip... just where exactly is this "Message" you're talking about coming from😂😂😂

    • @PSA04
      @PSA04 Місяць тому +2

      Love this notion. They are our cheerleaders.

    • @cory_hugs7850
      @cory_hugs7850 Місяць тому

      I’m pretty sure there here scoping the place out before they takeover and enslave us, we don’t have that kind of luck for them to be on our side 😂

    • @buddypage11
      @buddypage11 Місяць тому +3

      @@notyouraveragegoldenpotato Perhaps it is is for those that understand the ramifications of what they are observing and have the background to apply those insights in order to reverse engineer the phenomena.

  • @martinmclean4801
    @martinmclean4801 Місяць тому +10

    Hey Chris!
    This has been making the rounds.
    Keep on it bud.

  • @quipsilvervr
    @quipsilvervr Місяць тому +30

    I'm always skeptical when somebody makes an energy breakthrough and isn't dead. I hope they protect that guy behind museum glass. That video was absolutely not a drone. It's an extremely clear UAP video. If the breakthrough is legit, it could change everything, but if I were him, I'd be getting as much media coverage as possible and make sure people know he won't game-end himself.

    • @TheRealVenom87
      @TheRealVenom87 Місяць тому +3

      I think this is tech they have had a long time and it's being released in this way to save face on the governments behalf.but that's just my opinion

    • @Trader-SwingTheory
      @Trader-SwingTheory Місяць тому +3

      That didn't stop Boeing whackin that witness... That was all over the news for about 2 seconds then everyone forgot about it

    • @fuerLutzi
      @fuerLutzi Місяць тому

      You know these cylindrical black solar balloons we had back in the day?

    • @christophercooper3479
      @christophercooper3479 Місяць тому +1

      i hope he doesn't have anything happen to him

    • @RandyHill-bj9pc
      @RandyHill-bj9pc Місяць тому

      No worries, he'll be scamming this same grift on the uneducated for years to come.

  • @howardb.728
    @howardb.728 Місяць тому +1

    Thanks for sharing this Chris - appreciated and grateful :)

  • @LanTurner
    @LanTurner Місяць тому +32

    How long before this gets buried and we suddenly hear absolutely nothing more about it? I give it two weeks, and we’ll never hear another thing about it.

    • @leafystreet9247
      @leafystreet9247 24 дні тому +2

      Sad but true
      You would think musk would comment on this
      Its like mainstream industries in the space field want to stay old school
      Musk billions could propel this research into warp speed development.
      Nope. Crickets. This will fade away.

    • @glennelliott708
      @glennelliott708 22 дні тому

      2 weeks are up. Still on you tube. 87k views

    • @aseriousinquiry8425
      @aseriousinquiry8425 22 дні тому

      if this isn't buried, it will probably be like fuel cell technology.
      Lots of promises from politicians and major companies to get money and no significant change happens.

    • @jonathanpeters4240
      @jonathanpeters4240 21 день тому

      @@glennelliott708 This video is still up but that doesn't mean the subject isn't buried. The reality is that mankind has probably been producing ufos since the '40s, but that doesn't mean I can hop one to Paris.

    • @flashkraft
      @flashkraft 21 день тому

      That is what will happen if it gets military funding. It will all get classified and disappear.

  • @fluxcapacitor
    @fluxcapacitor Місяць тому +49

    If this propellantless thruster indeed produces at least 1 g-force (hence counteracting Earth's gravity!) in a vacuum chamber, where are the videos of it operating in full levitation? Until now, all propellantless claims were so tiny that the traces of their thrust levels were barely recorded, being deeply buried within the error bars of the background noise (and none of them moved macroscopically for the eyes to see, if you still wonder about this. Let alone take off). Thus, they were all inconclusive. Something is very, very bogus here.

    • @skwdenyer
      @skwdenyer Місяць тому +12

      The “test article” weighs 30-40g. The wiring, instrumentation & so on will weigh a lot more. The “test article” may not be able to support itself structurally. There’s a big difference between a piece of material generating 1g and a whole craft generating a net 1g. This thing won’t levitate. But it might be useful in space to generate continual net thrust over a long period of time.

    • @RichRocketMan
      @RichRocketMan Місяць тому +4

      ​@@skwdenyerAgreed. Plus, what is the power source? How much does it weigh?

  • @wade8130
    @wade8130 Місяць тому

    Fascinating stuff, wow! Thanks so much Chris!

  • @rod3134
    @rod3134 21 день тому +13

    This is not a breakthrough! This same technology, in the same operating description has been talked about for many decades. The difference now is that the old patents are expired and new players are attempting to re-patent them for a big payday. Anyone who's aware this tech knows the full truth behind it. I wish people would tell the FULL story.

  • @davemcginnis1568
    @davemcginnis1568 Місяць тому +7

    I heard him mention T Townsend Brown, this seems like an updated version of his work.

  • @ericjohnson8586
    @ericjohnson8586 Місяць тому

    You the man for having this topic on

  • @reeselynch3005
    @reeselynch3005 Місяць тому +9

    Bob Lazar we are sorry

  • @TommyMissus
    @TommyMissus Місяць тому +42

    This is exactly why I say *ANYTHING IS POSSIBLE*
    To claim something ISNT possible, is to claim to know EVERYTHING.
    Crazy stuff like this is going to continue to happen over and over again forever. Things will ALWAYS seem impossible when not understood, that's what happened in our history and it's happening to us right now. We always think we know everything there is to know... until we don't.
    *We don't know shit*

    • @tammysmart4486
      @tammysmart4486 Місяць тому +3

      Tommy- We know,,and we don't know..we are nit suppose to know what we know,, so disinformation, and blasphemy and defamation of character will remain.
      Your quotes were excellent.

    • @RandyHill-bj9pc
      @RandyHill-bj9pc Місяць тому

      This is exactly the logical fallacy called an argument from incredulity. Just because you don't know something, doesn't make it possible. We have a hundred years of scientific studies that demonstrate why this isn't possible, its a clear violation of how electrostatic forces work and the laws of conservation of momentum and energy.

    • @TommyMissus
      @TommyMissus Місяць тому +2

      @@tammysmart4486 👏 👏

    • @RandyHill-bj9pc
      @RandyHill-bj9pc Місяць тому +6

      To say anything is possible is a logical fallacy, we can clearly rule some things out through investigation of the universe and its properties. The basic physical rules of this universe have been confirmed through hundreds of years and millions of experiments. This guy claims to be able to break them and produce effects never seen in thousands of particle accelerator and electrostatic tests. Thats an extraordinary claim, so no one is saying it's impossible, just that it requires extraordinary evidence. Yet instead this guy has never subjected his findings to peer review or had any independent team validate his findings.

    • @TommyMissus
      @TommyMissus Місяць тому

      @@RandyHill-bj9pc no but we CANT. This is my point. We only THINK we can rule things out. It's what you believe is TRUTH, so there's no way you'll understand what I'm saying, and this is my whole point! Throughout history the ppl before us thought that EXACTLY like you do now. They base what they know off of what they THINK they know. Everything is subject to change, even "facts". It's always a possibility weve been looking at it wrong. Just as ppl say space is expanding, what if tomorrow they discover some weird bubble that surrounds our solar system that creates some sort of magnifying effect making us BELIEVE it was expanding. But before that point you would "100%" be certain all off of professional astronomical intelligence and experimentation that it was already a fact that was solid as stone. My whole point I'm trying to get at is that there's no way for you to even understand what I'm saying unless you wait 50 years and then look back at this comment. Think about how many billions of years the universe has been here, and through out all of the universes history only NOW, right now, we know what's going on ? lol what are the probabilities of that? I understand your not going to go back on your comment but I promise you, you are wrong and I will only prove you wrong far in the future bcuz when it does happen your going to be like OHHHHHH OK I get it now. And brother I understand your thought process bcuz I was once the same way. But once again, we don't know shit. Nothing.

  • @thirdsmusic
    @thirdsmusic Місяць тому +8

    Read the Townsend Brown biography, sounds very familiar.

  • @mostlyindica
    @mostlyindica Місяць тому

    Thanks Chris. Have a great day.

  • @Genghaodeshenghuo
    @Genghaodeshenghuo Місяць тому +3

    If this could be scaled up then use in out of atmosphere travel at a constraint thrust of 1g would mean extra planetary travel could be reduced to merely hours to several days for planets and bodies in our solar system.
    Estimations of travel time are below:
    The Moon / Luna:
    Closest to Earth (Supermoon): 356,577 km
    Travel time (at 9.80665 m/s2, no deceleration): 2h 22m 12s
    Travel time (at 9.80665 m/s2, decelerating halfway): 3h 20m 24s
    Mercury:
    Closest to Earth: 77.3 million km
    Travel time (at 9.80665 m/s2, no deceleration): 1d 10h 52m 48s
    Travel time (at 9.80665 m/s2, decelerating halfway): 2d 1h 19m 12s
    Venus:
    Closest to Earth: 40 million km
    Travel time (at 9.80665 m/s2, no deceleration): 1d 1h 5m 2s
    Travel time (at 9.80665 m/s2, decelerating halfway): 1d 11h 28m 48s
    Mars:
    Closest to Earth: 65 million km
    Travel time (at 9.80665 m/s2, no deceleration): 1d 7h 58m 5s
    Travel time (at 9.80665 m/s2, decelerating halfway): 1d 21h 13m 1s
    Jupiter:
    Closest to Earth: 588 million km
    Travel time (at 9.80665 m/s2, no deceleration): 4d 0h 11m 2s
    Travel time (at 9.80665 m/s2, decelerating halfway): 5d 16h 2m 2s
    Saturn:
    Closest to Earth: 1.2 billion km
    Travel time (at 9.80665 m/s2, no deceleration): 5d 17h 25m 1s
    Travel time (at 9.80665 m/s2, decelerating halfway): 8d 2h 20m 24s
    Uranus:
    Closest to Earth: 2.57 billion km
    Travel time (at 9.80665 m/s2, no deceleration): 8d 9h 6m 0s
    Travel time (at 9.80665 m/s2, decelerating halfway): 11d 20h 24m 0s
    Neptune:
    Closest to Earth: 4.3 billion km
    Travel time (at 9.80665 m/s2, no deceleration): 10d 20h 7m 48s
    Travel time (at 9.80665 m/s2, decelerating halfway): 15d 7h 52m 48s
    Pluto:
    Closest to Earth: 4.28 billion km
    Travel time (at 9.80665 m/s2, no deceleration): 10d 19h 31m 12s
    Travel time (at 9.80665 m/s2, decelerating halfway): 15d 7h 1m 12s
    It could also mean that at a constant 1g thrust, travel to other star systems could be completed within a handful of years.

    • @ryanakers1372
      @ryanakers1372 23 дні тому

      Thanks for the calculations! Really helps put the achievement into perspective. A vehicle with 1g thrust could probably catch up to Voyager in just a few months.
      Really hope scaling it up doesn't present too many problems.

  • @GreenGibbon
    @GreenGibbon Місяць тому +15

    Excellent stuff! As a long time UFO buff, this news cheers me up! 🙂

    • @ChrisLehtoF16
      @ChrisLehtoF16  Місяць тому +2

      You and me both!

    • @RandyHill-bj9pc
      @RandyHill-bj9pc Місяць тому

      Believing in UFOs is always such a sad endeavor. You have to believe advanced aliens discovered ways to break the fundamental laws of the universe in order to travel across it in reasonable amounts of time, and after expending trillions of times more energy than humans have ever made to come here, decline to make themselves known so they can just hang out and watch us from a distance like some creepy cosmic peeper.

  • @mimisimatic5387
    @mimisimatic5387 Місяць тому +1

    Wow 😮 very intriguing ✌🏻

  • @FrequencyRaising
    @FrequencyRaising Місяць тому

    Thank you Chris
    Appreciate you so much.

  • @SiriusDogStar369
    @SiriusDogStar369 Місяць тому +5

    Just got here. If this is true, and it feels like it is, I have one wish.
    Keep this man safe.

  • @davidburfield5873
    @davidburfield5873 Місяць тому +8

    Commentary from Eric Davis, Salvatore Pais etc would be interesting....

    • @donbrearley3148
      @donbrearley3148 Місяць тому +4

      This sounds like what Pais was talking about in his interview with Curt Jaimungal

    • @davidburfield5873
      @davidburfield5873 Місяць тому +1

      @@donbrearley3148 ....yes, Curt's perspective would also be interesting....

  • @worldclassish
    @worldclassish Місяць тому

    Thanks for the excellent explosion my friend. Wow amazing

  • @JustinTime_143
    @JustinTime_143 Місяць тому

    This was an excellent video Chris as always! I love the science

    • @RandyHill-bj9pc
      @RandyHill-bj9pc Місяць тому +1

      There was no science in this video, unless you count easily debunkable pseudo science claims.

  • @jjbud3124
    @jjbud3124 Місяць тому +13

    Would this cause plasma to form outside the object, as in those night time spheres we see? Would the outside of the object being covered in a plasma cause the blurriness seen in most videos and photos? Just wondering.

    • @heathwalker6938
      @heathwalker6938 Місяць тому

      I've know about Atmospheric Electrostatic energy for a few years now. For every meter up, there is a 10x voltage differential. So we basically give an object the same charge as the Earth because like charges repel?

  • @quitequiet5281
    @quitequiet5281 Місяць тому +6

    Awesome briefing!!!👍🎊

  • @jamesgreenler8225
    @jamesgreenler8225 Місяць тому +2

    After listening to this Im thinking we are on the right track.
    I would hypothesize that the UAP have discovered a few things we haven't yet so its difficult to apply the tec and get identical results because we can't fully duplicate the technology yet, but y'all are on the right track IMO.
    Maybe power is via a pumping action where the device powers up and then discharges every 3-4 seconds . Like an even slow heart beat .

  • @wonderwonder6880
    @wonderwonder6880 Місяць тому +2

    Zooming Around!!! A classic terminology. George Jetson time has come. J.L Thanks for getting this out there .....

  • @FPVREVIEWS
    @FPVREVIEWS Місяць тому +49

    This is the EM drive all over again. This is also why peer reviewed studies are imperative to science. And why replication of experiments takes place.

    • @ChrisLehtoF16
      @ChrisLehtoF16  Місяць тому +4

      You think it’s not legit?

    • @martinw245
      @martinw245 Місяць тому +22

      Yes, it's currently a claim. It needs to be replicated.
      This has happened before and not panned out.
      If the results are replicated by others and verified to be valid, it will be good news. until then, we should be cautious.

    • @ramonpuello2357
      @ramonpuello2357 Місяць тому

      Exactly. It's a cycle that we must be aware of because "they"will only let get as far until "they" decide if we're ready. If not, "they" will reset us back to the stone age.

    • @xxxxMaddnesSxxxx
      @xxxxMaddnesSxxxx Місяць тому +8

      This definitely needs to be peer reviewed. Even if it is legit, I worry about the powers that be suppressing it. Technology like this should not be hidden just to be capitalized. File your patent for the technology to harness it, fine, but release all your data on how it works so your discovery can be used by others in the (not unlikely) case you and your data is destroyed.

    • @armwrestlerjeff
      @armwrestlerjeff Місяць тому +5

      ​@@xxxxMaddnesSxxxxgreat points

  • @Holy-Hand-Grenade-of-Antioch
    @Holy-Hand-Grenade-of-Antioch Місяць тому +6

    Yet to be independently verified.

  • @orbitmonkey5267
    @orbitmonkey5267 Місяць тому

    Excellent, was hoping you'd talk about this. =)

  • @davidmathes6730
    @davidmathes6730 Місяць тому

    That one graph looks like a tic tac vertically, Chris, wow very fascinating.

  • @gardnert1
    @gardnert1 Місяць тому +5

    I feel like this was discovered a while ago but just put in the black.

    • @gytis321s2
      @gytis321s2 Місяць тому

      Dude... It's not "discovered" UFO craft reverse engineering... They've been doing this for 80+ years

  • @Catkinscat
    @Catkinscat Місяць тому +27

    I think there is no way they will release it to the public, I also think that if we are finding out about it, they must have had it for a long time, which makes me wonder what kind of vehicles the military have and are not telling anyone about 🤷‍♀️

    • @karadan100
      @karadan100 Місяць тому +5

      You have it the wrong way round. An independent company with smart ex-NASA scientists uncover an amazing facet of physics we don't currently know of, and in two years you'll remember this video and won't be able to find it. Nor any mention of it online anywhere else.

    • @mrwhat5094
      @mrwhat5094 Місяць тому +3

      ​@@karadan100not in this day. There is a record of everything, not even the president's son can hide his sugar sprinkles.

    • @RandyHill-bj9pc
      @RandyHill-bj9pc Місяць тому +3

      If he has a patent he had to disclose everything to the world. The real problem is this violates the basic laws of physics that have been tested over centuries and thousands of tests. Somehow he's claiming an extraordinary effect missed by hundreds of particle accelerators that measure everything to an infinitesimal level. Simply by( voila!) styrafoam.

    • @mrwhat5094
      @mrwhat5094 Місяць тому +1

      @@RandyHill-bj9pc what laws exactly

    • @RandyHill-bj9pc
      @RandyHill-bj9pc Місяць тому +2

      @@mrwhat5094 Coulombs Law, Newtons Laws of Motion, The law of Conservation of Energy, the laws of Electrostatics that clearly require two charged objects to generate force between them, etc.

  • @darkpoolmm
    @darkpoolmm Місяць тому

    Spectacular content 👏

  • @philiptruitt
    @philiptruitt Місяць тому

    Thanks Chris!

  • @qaesarx
    @qaesarx Місяць тому +7

    YEAH FINALLY I WILL GET MY HOVERBOARD AND FLYING AND HOWERING CAR!!! 😀UHUUUUU 😀IMAGINE THE APPLICATIONS!!!!!

    • @ChrisLehtoF16
      @ChrisLehtoF16  Місяць тому +3

      Yes, a real hoverboard would be sweet

  • @surfman88
    @surfman88 Місяць тому +8

    Hopefully it gets accepted by our govie this time and he doesn’t fall from a window

  • @ShaunVillafana
    @ShaunVillafana 22 дні тому +1

    Well if you recall, bob Lazar specifically talked about there being another type of charge but not being electricity as we know it. I also believe he mentioned what we refer to as the "weak nuclear force" being actually the positive charge of protons within an atomic structure, and hypothetically, if you were to have one side of a object or craft have it's dialectric component immensely charged with electrons which are also flowing around the object towards a convexing nodal point, yes, it makes sense that the resulting propulsion would effectively be itself propelling itself without anything actually being propelled from the object, except space vector.

    • @ChrisLehtoF16
      @ChrisLehtoF16  22 дні тому +2

      Interesting thanks, I didn’t remember lazar saying that about charge

  • @MikeHacker
    @MikeHacker 23 дні тому

    Been waiting

  • @AP0THEKERIN
    @AP0THEKERIN Місяць тому +4

    WoW!!!

  • @mrparrehesian1742
    @mrparrehesian1742 Місяць тому +5

    Paul LaViolette wrote Secrets of Antigravity Propulsion and talked about the B-1 Bomber using high voltage electrically charged leading edge of the wings. Electrostatics could be similar in this case.

    • @phoenixrising4073
      @phoenixrising4073 Місяць тому

      If this were true for the B1, it would be for radar cross section reduction.

    • @winkekatze5593
      @winkekatze5593 26 днів тому

      Dude, I read the book you mentioned and he wrote about the B2 Stealth Bomber. Not the Rockwell B1 Lancer. Please, before you write something as important as this make sure your facts are right.

    • @winkekatze5593
      @winkekatze5593 26 днів тому

      @@phoenixrising4073 In the book it is talked about the B2 Stealth Bomber. Not the B1. Commenter remembered it wrong.

    • @mrparrehesian1742
      @mrparrehesian1742 26 днів тому

      @@winkekatze5593 It was a long time ago and the memory has faded. Not like you have ever experienced that. Perfect people are great.

  • @timgstar3585
    @timgstar3585 Місяць тому +1

    Very exciting Chris.The sceptic in me is saying strange timing to come out with this now considering everything that's going on in the world right now

  • @twostate7822
    @twostate7822 5 днів тому +2

    If true, this would be an incredible discovery that ranks up there with the greatest discoveries in world history. If false, it may be ranked as a worse hoax than cold fusion.

    • @ChrisLehtoF16
      @ChrisLehtoF16  5 днів тому

      Time will tell, we should know more this year

  • @ESL-O.G.
    @ESL-O.G. Місяць тому +5

    Well, well, well

  • @atari664
    @atari664 Місяць тому

    Keep up the great work Chris :)

  • @Sxuk
    @Sxuk Місяць тому +7

    Any working prototypes?. Very interesting.

    • @Thunderbyrd.
      @Thunderbyrd. Місяць тому

      It was acquired by reverse engineering one of the UAP's in inventory.

  • @vinnies8in
    @vinnies8in Місяць тому

    great job

  • @stringstroker22
    @stringstroker22 Місяць тому +1

    Chris, when Dr. Buhler explained what the configuration of asymetrical capacitors, I recall the "ARV" (Alien Reproduction Vehicle) and the underlying asymmetric electro-mechanical force generator, as 2 discs rotating to generate extremely high electrostatic voltages, which would create the force to overcome gravity. It seems similar to what is discussed here.

  • @shivercanada
    @shivercanada Місяць тому +3

    Just because it’s new to us doesn’t mean aliens use it. I still think they use an engine that creates gravity, which would be far more efficient. If you have an onboard machine that creates gravitons you can go any direction at any speed.

  • @FancyPants43
    @FancyPants43 Місяць тому +6

    I believe this will lead us into the new wave of generating thrust for our vehicles in the sky. Until we can solve harnessing the extreme powers that may be, then the two will go hand-to-hand. Very cool content, Chris! 💯

  • @johnrdadrian
    @johnrdadrian 4 дні тому

    They mention "High Voltage Capacitors". This is exactly what Thomas Townsend Brown did in 1921. While experimenting in a lab his parents had set up for him while he was still in high school. Brown discovered an unusual effect using a Coolidge tube (hot cathode tube), a type of X-ray vacuum tube with two asymmetrical electrodes. When extremely high voltage was applied, the weight of the capacitor was reduced. This is also similar to what Germans Developed during the 2nd World War, a device they called "Die Glocke" or the bell in English.
    This is huge, it could upend air & space travel.

  • @rickjason215
    @rickjason215 Місяць тому

    Thanks!

  • @augustusgrim1446
    @augustusgrim1446 Місяць тому +4

    Wholly crrap. Star Trek here we come. Seriously, the world will be very different in 100 years.

    • @funkimunky1
      @funkimunky1 Місяць тому

      Star Trek was a documentary

  • @funkimunky1
    @funkimunky1 Місяць тому +3

    Buhler?....Buhler?....Buhler?

  • @CNCTEMATIC
    @CNCTEMATIC Місяць тому +2

    My first thought on this was: if this tech becomes usable in any way, from then onwards every UFO will be written off as new experimental propulsion vehicles.

  • @th600mike3
    @th600mike3 Місяць тому +3

    Biefeld brown effect yet again. NASA did their best to try to crush it, now someone from nasa is trying to sell it 😂

  • @jasonpitts8395
    @jasonpitts8395 Місяць тому +6

    Hopefully NASA doesnt own the patent.

    • @ChrisLehtoF16
      @ChrisLehtoF16  Місяць тому

      They don’t!

    • @pedrosura
      @pedrosura Місяць тому

      More worried about DOD.

    • @iNeed50SubscribersToGoLive
      @iNeed50SubscribersToGoLive Місяць тому

      Yeah at least NASA would me monitored. DOD and Private Contractors hidden by layers of secrecy and compartmentalization on the other hand…

    • @malachiteofmethuselah9713
      @malachiteofmethuselah9713 Місяць тому

      It does not matter whom comes up with it. Under the current surveillance state, they own them all before you decide it works.

  • @grandfrosty
    @grandfrosty Місяць тому

    I knew the information was being rolled out, it's still good to hear that it's being mass disseminated! Thanks for the great work you are doing and I love your presentation style! Clear and concise communications, very professional. And appreciated

  • @fukhue8226
    @fukhue8226 Місяць тому +4

    I'm sure someone is building a Shelf for this technology as we watch this video!

  • @WestOfEarth
    @WestOfEarth Місяць тому

    Incredible. These thrusters may be small, but place thousands of these together and that net positive acceleration adds up.

  • @xanxus8272
    @xanxus8272 Місяць тому +1

    Very interesting

  • @Partimepeasant
    @Partimepeasant 14 днів тому

    I have seen this before as an extruder operator in PTFE , dropping the product 4 stories down it would generate an electrostatic charge that would perform the same way. The plant manager and myself were there but didn't recognize for what it was. This was around 2013.

  • @RobMetal-ie5hd
    @RobMetal-ie5hd Місяць тому

    I was wondering how quickly you make a vid covering this.
    Awesome new propulsion method. We still have yet to see it get a person airborne ( at least publicly… maybe?)
    So it will still be a good while before he, or his team, make a drone,or something big, that uses this electro static propulsion, I’m still excited to see what they come up with lol.
    I love the tone of this video Chris, a precurser to flying Chevys, maybe. 20 years from now.

  • @brendabolling3424
    @brendabolling3424 29 днів тому +1

    I informed Elon musk two weeks ago , about my experiences of having been taken on board many extraterrestrial space crafts since 1957. I have shared my experience with a myriad of individuals throughout my life, not believing my experience as truth of space travel on board these alien craft . I later learned back in 1980’s about Bob Lazar’s ability to back engineer these extraterrestrial craft . Which I had recently encourage Elon Musk to Persue this free electromagnetic energy propulsion system to harness this electromagnetic energy system for his rockets . I still maintain my communication with these extraterrestrial entities to this day. Thank’s to Elon Musk , for believing in me and he has made me feel proud , by announcing this idea to our world !

    • @rpscorp9457
      @rpscorp9457 29 днів тому

      Musk thinks youre a nutter...He didnt have the heart to tell you that himself.

  • @PCG2022
    @PCG2022 Місяць тому

    I would love to make you some backing music Chris :) Let me know if you want some sounds. Great to be here as usual.

  • @chadrowlett893
    @chadrowlett893 13 днів тому

    Finally TT BROWN HAS HIS DAY

  • @fperez988
    @fperez988 Місяць тому

    This is huge!

  • @rex2837
    @rex2837 Місяць тому +2

    Very interesting wow

  • @travisj.936
    @travisj.936 Місяць тому

    ❤ wow thats amazing stuff 🛸🌏🌎🌍 thats huge news!

  • @killeresk
    @killeresk Місяць тому

    A lot of possibilities for that area for sure.

  • @jarrowmarrow
    @jarrowmarrow Місяць тому +1

    Wow this could save us from ourselves. I was just in Utah in the gas and oil fields. The companies were in an unseemly hurry to grab as much as they could from Mother Nature. I really hope change is coming and we can utilize these breakthroughs asap.

  • @leslieweiser5455
    @leslieweiser5455 Місяць тому +2

    We do have a little power as citizens in this country. We have to show up and vote. If every open minded caring person like the people on this feed voted. The world would change. We must take the power back 🌎 ❤

  • @goneWoodsing
    @goneWoodsing Місяць тому +2

    Colonel Tom Bearden spoke of the need to break symmetry to access zero point energy for years.

  • @lucjacques6520
    @lucjacques6520 4 дні тому

    I've built a vortex propulsion drive A rotating fluidic mass can be distorted so that 3/4 of the vortex is heavier leaving 1/4 of the vortex lighter ...the key is in the fluid speeding up to the center of rotation to compensate for the distortion of the rotating fluid Thrustless propulsion

  • @robertjames4908
    @robertjames4908 Місяць тому +1

    Kaluza-Klein theory has a scalar force proportional to charge squared over the mass. Being a scalar, this probably needs a highly asymmetrical arrangement to realise a vector being a force in this case.

  • @michaelwright131
    @michaelwright131 Місяць тому

    BTW, who is WE?....A+ reporting Chris 🏆

  • @jamiesnow2670
    @jamiesnow2670 Місяць тому

    Finally !

  • @barryoverson4988
    @barryoverson4988 Місяць тому

    i click the like button when i watch videos for free and subscribe if i regularly watch thanks for your work

  • @DabstiX
    @DabstiX Місяць тому

    I am excited for this Breakthru. For what it counts you won't see me say this often lol.

  • @CNCTEMATIC
    @CNCTEMATIC Місяць тому

    My second thought was, its about time we got this technology

  • @ticthak
    @ticthak Місяць тому +1

    If it's electrostatic force, there's nothing "unknown" about the theory, it's the application and engineering that are revolutionary- this also means development and deployment might be like IC electronics, essentially Moore's Law.

  • @kevinb4783
    @kevinb4783 Місяць тому

    fascinating

  • @BiGG_X
    @BiGG_X Місяць тому

    3:45 looking at what they drew up here reminded me of the Dendera light bulb. I dont know why LOL, it just did.

  • @guruware8612
    @guruware8612 8 днів тому

    02:45 - full understanding :)

  • @nixter1nixter1
    @nixter1nixter1 Місяць тому

    If they are achieving one gravity of force now, they can multiply that force as required. An object being accelerated with a force of 100 Gs, such as a probe, would attempt to reach light speed within one year. This would be an extremely valuable experiment to measure the actual mass increase as it accelerated.

  • @lsporter88
    @lsporter88 Місяць тому

    So they have a Patent, and we're being told about it on a UA-cam. That would mean that this science can no longer being suppressed. That's good. So when proper Financing is available in the Public Commercial Sector, this will move rather quickly. It's about time. Excellent video.

  • @matttirado7661
    @matttirado7661 18 днів тому

    What kind of material is needed to handle the type of velocity necessary for interstellar travel?

  • @Jman-co7xw
    @Jman-co7xw Місяць тому

    You can also use frequency’s to break down the air and gravity forces around an object and propel it.

  • @douggraham5812
    @douggraham5812 Місяць тому

    Experiments with asymmetric capacitors have shown that there is no "new force" involved. There is still something being accelerated and "thrown out the back" to produce the reaction force, and that "something" is air. Experiments in a vacuum chamber show that the thrust decreases toward zero as the pressure of the surrounding gas is decreased.