Would you still say Boris is easy without Shadow of Change units to make Kislev more playable? I find their early game pretty fucking horrible with only base game units.
Yes, games break when you abuse mechanics. A lot of fun mechanics/campaigns that aren't OP in certain situations become so if you abuse them. I guess some people have this urge to optimize to the point it's like OCD and they can't help themselves. Ironically despite having OCD this isn't an issue for me. I do things for the plot, I play like a story teller. I will gladly RP out a minor nation that only hold specific regions and fights to regain territory for other allied factions. As such the only unfair advantages I hate are ones unavoidable. Like Golg getting way too much reward for his contracts. I dislike the teleport thing, but considering how tight some of the time limits on certain contracts are, I understand it. Also with how far away some are. Getting a cathay contract early game is always amusing. I guess from a competitive multiplayer angle broken mechanics are an issue, but I just don't play with people who play like that.
no idea why you would even return the land to cathay in the first place when one of the first settlements you take has the most broken landmark in the entire game especially for gelt's faction. giving mastery of the elemental winds to all battle wizards is super op.
No. If you lose ALL armies all cults are revealed but only then. Since you know armies are invisible in a cult region go figure. Now as a player you can handle it sure, but the AI especially Stirland? Nope.
Id say the strongest melee LL´s are Skarbrand and Malus... Be'lakor, Skulltaker, Grimgor, Imrik, Gor Rok and Ku´Gath deserve a mention (had to cut the list somewhere, didnt want to be naming too many)... also i have actually not played all lords (like 2-3 not), or some not for quite a while
Yuan Bo, Imrik, Durthu and Kugath are the most powerful LL I think. For example with Yuan Bo I can easy win against Archaon, Grimgor, Skulltaker, Malus, Tyrion etc... It's harder against Belakor or Skarbrand but win. Emperor's executionner is broken in 1vs1 duel.
Would you still say Boris is easy without Shadow of Change units to make Kislev more playable? I find their early game pretty fucking horrible with only base game units.
Well you win the campaign before you can even use them so yes
Yes, games break when you abuse mechanics. A lot of fun mechanics/campaigns that aren't OP in certain situations become so if you abuse them. I guess some people have this urge to optimize to the point it's like OCD and they can't help themselves. Ironically despite having OCD this isn't an issue for me.
I do things for the plot, I play like a story teller. I will gladly RP out a minor nation that only hold specific regions and fights to regain territory for other allied factions.
As such the only unfair advantages I hate are ones unavoidable. Like Golg getting way too much reward for his contracts. I dislike the teleport thing, but considering how tight some of the time limits on certain contracts are, I understand it. Also with how far away some are. Getting a cathay contract early game is always amusing.
I guess from a competitive multiplayer angle broken mechanics are an issue, but I just don't play with people who play like that.
Boring...
Can you do your favorite campaigns like overall fun with challenges
no idea why you would even return the land to cathay in the first place when one of the first settlements you take has the most broken landmark in the entire game especially for gelt's faction. giving mastery of the elemental winds to all battle wizards is super op.
You can get it back, abandon settlement before you leave and rush general to take it from Gnoblar Country.
@@Costin_Gaming I see but generally I would just prefer to hold the territory.
Why did you not like gorbads campaign?
Wait didn't they change the changling to have all cults revealed after the defeat of the LL
No. If you lose ALL armies all cults are revealed but only then.
Since you know armies are invisible in a cult region go figure. Now as a player you can handle it sure, but the AI especially Stirland? Nope.
Is this the strongest legendary lords?
What LL is the strongest melee on?
Probably Skarbrand or Malus dark blade also Archeon is insanely strong
Id say the strongest melee LL´s are Skarbrand and Malus...
Be'lakor, Skulltaker, Grimgor, Imrik, Gor Rok and Ku´Gath deserve a mention
(had to cut the list somewhere, didnt want to be naming too many)... also i have actually not played all lords (like 2-3 not), or some not for quite a while
Imrik also becomes a monster with the buffs from his dragon battles
Yuan Bo, Imrik, Durthu and Kugath are the most powerful LL I think.
For example with Yuan Bo I can easy win against Archaon, Grimgor, Skulltaker, Malus, Tyrion etc... It's harder against Belakor or Skarbrand but win.
Emperor's executionner is broken in 1vs1 duel.
I would say Skarbrand , Taurox and Malus . Also Archeon can nuke mid fight