Hiryu: Long Reach Manipulator with Thrusters

Поділитися
Вставка
  • Опубліковано 16 лип 2018
  • Suzumori Endo Lab, Tokyo Tech and Yokohama KH Tech Corp proposed a new concept achieving super long reach articulated manipulator with gravity compensation using thrusters. This concept has been presented in IEEE/ASME International Conference on Advanced Intelligent Mechatronics (AIM2018). The proposed manipulator has (1) ground fixed base, (2) tethers for power and information transmission, (3) articulated links connected by joints, and (4) thruster(s) for weight compensation. Because of weight compensation by thruster(s), the proposed manipulator can be super long reach due to free from gravity. After an experiment using 1 D.O.F experimental setup for principle confirmation, an experimental prototype consisted of passive four-bar linkages, active yaw joints and paired counter-rotating propellers, was developed. We successfully demonstrated the proposed concept by three dimensional motions controlled by thrusters and yaw joints.
    Project members: Yoshihide Nakamura, Gen Endo, Hiroyuki Nabae, Koichi Suzumori, and Tetsuo Hagiwara of Yokohama KH Tech Corp.
    G. Endo, T. Hagiwara, Y. Nakamura, H. Nabae, and K. Suzumori, A Proposal of Super Long Reach Articulated Manipulator with Gravity Compensation using Thrusters, IEEE/ASME International Conference on Advanced Intelligent Mechatronics, ThBT6.6, 2018
    Our lab's URL is here (Japanese): www-robot.mes.titech.ac.jp/ This video can be used for informational purposes such as Internet Web pages. This general permission extends to media and personal Web pages except for advertisement. Please clearly state copyright for the source of the material, "Suzumori Endo Lab, Tokyo Institute of Technology". Any further questions, please contact our public relations at Tokyo institute of Technology. Thank you. Mail to : media@jim.titech.ac.jp
  • Наука та технологія

КОМЕНТАРІ • 9

  • @mllhild
    @mllhild 3 роки тому +1

    The only advantage compared to using drones connected via cable that I see is ease of control and a bit more stability. The question would be if thats worth the reduced mobility and lift capacity, especially since a version with only a cable could go around numerous corners and be stored easier as well. Further more a cable could be stored on a roll and the drones connected and taking off as the cable rolls out. Given that this would require far more extensive flight control and path planning.

  • @AaronSof
    @AaronSof 3 роки тому

    Looking forward to when two fight in each in battle.

  • @turtleflightstudios
    @turtleflightstudios 6 років тому +2

    This is really interesting, thinking outside of the range of the usual super-heavy and very high-strength manipulator for something of this size, but my main question is what the benefit of such joint-bound propellors would have over, say, a drone-is there significantly extra strength or control? Intriguing concept, either way.

  • @Garganzuul
    @Garganzuul 6 років тому +1

    Perhaps a ducted fan would be appropriate for this application. While the rest of the industry is going the way of collaborative robots, this project seems to be going in the opposite direction.

  • @charliedulol
    @charliedulol 6 років тому +4

    what's the point? really, why use something like this?

    • @HaloWolf102
      @HaloWolf102 6 років тому +1

      You would of said the same thing back when electricity was first discovered, 'why use something like this?'

    • @isn0t42
      @isn0t42 6 років тому +1

      +James Mitchell No. It's a very legit point. There was a ton of potential in electricity. The question with this thing: Is it at all beneficial to have drones carry an arm on top of the load they're going to carry anyway? Wouldn't it be better to just have the drones without the arm? What's the practical application of this configuration?

    • @charliedulol
      @charliedulol 6 років тому +1

      exactly
      it's noisy, big, not much strong, and not very steady.
      what will you use this for?

    • @leoahrens
      @leoahrens 4 роки тому

      Fire hose?