Story Behind All the Martial Laws Pakistan has Witnessed

Поділитися
Вставка
  • Опубліковано 25 кві 2022
  • Since 1947, Pakistan has witnessed more than three decades of military dictatorship by four different dictators. Politics and IR expert, Dr Raja Qaiser explains the factors that led to the military coup in Pakistan at all four instances.
    Editorial edit: Khawaja Nazimuddin's government was dismissed by Malik Ghulam Muhammad, NOT Iskander Mirza
    TCM’s five-year journey has been about telling stories that people want to hear which mainstream media has been neglecting for decades. We want to disrupt the status quo by delivering engaging content which empowers impassioned voices and impacts social change. We are defined by integrity, grit and ingenuity and this is what makes us do what we do.
    Support independent journalism in Pakistan and get exclusive access to the full-length version of our videos: / thecentrummedia
    -------------------
    Subscribe to TCM Original: bit.ly/2A3pOXz
    Subscribe to TCM: bit.ly/2Tu6AkW
    -------------------
    Follow us on
    Facebook: / tcmoriginalsofficial
    Facebook: / thecentrummedia
    Facebook: / centrumenter. .
    Tiktok: / tcmoriginals
    Twitter: / thecentrummedia
    Instagram: / thecentrummedia
    -------------------
    Join our Facebook community: bit.ly/35oeLVs
    -------------------
    Website: thecentrummedia.com
    -------------------
    About The Centrum Media
    The Centrum Media (TCM) has the credit of Pakistan’s first digital news operation specializing in visual storytelling. Being a premier online platform, TCM strives to enhance the online experience of the new generation, ranging from hard news to feature stories. TCM creates original content and curates simultaneously from multiple sources.
    We will take you where the real stories happen but often go untold and unseen in the shortest possible time having more information. Unlike the traditional media, TCM aims at sharing diverse stories across multi-platforms aimed at the people who consume news through mobile and social stream. We take up the challenge in the digital arena to present the news in the most imaginative and innovative ways.
    Your on-the-go lifestyle forces us to bring the news directly to your pocket devices.

КОМЕНТАРІ • 82

  • @abdalkhanyousufzai719
    @abdalkhanyousufzai719 2 роки тому +28

    He's my teacher, a very well learned and humble personality, we're proud of you sir

  • @maisondusavoir3600
    @maisondusavoir3600 2 роки тому +20

    Actually, our Army is more efficient in interfering in politics rather than dealing with BLA and TTP ...In fact we are losing in Balochistan !!!!

    • @liftusup9208
      @liftusup9208 2 роки тому

      This coutry is made to keep fighting and suppressing its people by design so that no body question the real objectives of partition.
      We do all powers chip in for an "agreement" in 65 and 71 war? Because they want us to stay divided and play role of a buffer state. They want anything but a united subcontinent standing as one of top-3 nations in the world.

    • @hunter62207
      @hunter62207 Рік тому +1

      I agree with the first part but we are not loosing in Balochistan it’s stagnant yes but we’re not loosing Waziristan was much worse and we dealt with it.

    • @liftusup9208
      @liftusup9208 Рік тому +1

      @@hunter62207 Waziristan was not worse, it was a different problem. Also, we are still having its fallout in the shape of PTM.
      In Balochistan, a percentage is going against the state, unlike waziristan where outsiders brainwashed percentage into fighting.

    • @esapzai9844
      @esapzai9844 Рік тому

      @@liftusup9208 it wasnt outsiders who did the brainwashing bro.

  • @fahadhussain66
    @fahadhussain66 Рік тому +11

    12:48 this is exactly why people were respectful of them. They would manipulate the system through political engineering and then come in as the rescuers. The regular Joe on the street would only see them as the rescuer rather than the one who caused the mess in the first place.

  • @waqasmaqsood9270
    @waqasmaqsood9270 2 роки тому +19

    Sad story of a 70 year old military led country...😔

  • @hassanriaz2237
    @hassanriaz2237 2 роки тому +3

    Dear Sir, the government of Khwaja Nazumddin was dismissed by Gulam Muhammad not Iskander Mirza. @3:21
    Regards.

  • @umairghouri7122
    @umairghouri7122 2 роки тому +10

    really appreciate, how the military regimen is explained.

  • @TCMOriginals
    @TCMOriginals  2 роки тому +5

    TCM puts in great effort and hours of active teamwork to bring you the latest video content. Your support on Patreon will make us get bigger.
    Link: www.patreon.com/thecentrummedia

  • @tehseenullah3082
    @tehseenullah3082 Рік тому +1

    Zbr10 explains sir stay bless U❤️🙏

  • @IK-wp5eq
    @IK-wp5eq 2 роки тому +7

    It is not preparedness of army because if it was than there are many other countries with better prepared armies than Pakistan and we don't see coups happening there. The main reason is that Army doesn't allow civilian institutions to be strong like Police, Politicians, Judiciary. The second reason is there is no counter paramilitary force independent of army. There are rangers but they are under military command. The third reason is the military's 111 brigade provides security for the PM and the President which upon Generals order they are the ones who would arrest the PM and the President. Fourth reason is ISI is headed by army General which is the secret agency. Therefore Army does not win the race because they can run the fastest, but they win the race by crippling the competition. This is also the reason why Pakistan never saw improvement in public sectors and services in over 70 years while the rest of the region did. It should be clear army wants to keep everything under their control by crippling everyone else including the public. Therefore no good public education, no good public health services, no good public opportunities even no good city services and therefore you see a lot of garbage all around the city. Army deliberately keeps the system dirty and corrupted so that only army can prosper. And of course if any good leader comes, they are disposed off (remember they win by crippling).

    • @NaveedAli-ut1nl
      @NaveedAli-ut1nl 2 роки тому

      In all the points you made above you just explained the high preparedness of the army yourself. Basically you yourself have complimented the point he made about army preparing for power.

    • @IK-wp5eq
      @IK-wp5eq 2 роки тому +1

      @@NaveedAli-ut1nl This is the kind of so called "Preparedness" (more like declaration of war by the army on own country) you don't want and it shows where Pakistan is today. It is nothing to be proud of.

    • @NaveedAli-ut1nl
      @NaveedAli-ut1nl 2 роки тому

      @@IK-wp5eq I don’t like army intervention in politics, so am not proud of the army preparedness to intervene. I’m simply stating a fact, the army is always prepared to take over.

    • @IK-wp5eq
      @IK-wp5eq 2 роки тому +1

      @@NaveedAli-ut1nl Sounds good. Lets hope this negative preparedness changes to a positive preparedness and in our lifetime.

    • @MuzikAficionado
      @MuzikAficionado Рік тому

      You cant blame the moral and financial corruptness of civil bureaucracy, legislature and politicians on army. If a person has a price to be sold for, anyone can buy that person. If not, no one can buy or derail someone from the right path.

  • @noorulhameed
    @noorulhameed 2 роки тому +1

    such valuable info

  • @Mr.Adlag.
    @Mr.Adlag. 2 роки тому +2

    And then army says they want to remain neutral. Army should stay with righteousness rather than being neutral.

  • @aslamknawaz7958
    @aslamknawaz7958 2 роки тому +5

    Sir you said after jinnah and liaqat ali khan there was no big leader
    What about Fatima jinnah ji ?

    • @danielkazmi2180
      @danielkazmi2180 Рік тому +3

      Fatimah jinnah was not a political entity she was a social worker. Her fame was only because of her brother. She was nominated by the opposition in 1965 because they knew public will vote for her because of her status in the country. And the interesting thing is she died 2 years after the election so if she had won the election the government would have been inevitabley handed over to the ones behind fatimah jinnah. So in my opinion it was better that ayub won the 65 elections...

  • @AshishTiwari-sl4ju
    @AshishTiwari-sl4ju Рік тому +1

    In his assessment of the coup of 1999 done by musharaf, he is not being factual. Not even once did he mentioned kargil. It was this misadventure that costed Nawaz Sharif his job. It is well-known that Nawaz welcomed Mr Vajpayee to Lahore and musharaf was planning something else. This was the reason for 1999 coup. TCM should have checked the entire video and only then it should have been allowed to uploaded.

  • @wkhan5
    @wkhan5 2 роки тому +12

    The story of the 1999 coup was not as simple as he makes it out to be. He fails to mention that to appease Musharraf, NS gave him the dual role of chairman joint chiefs of staff committee on top of his existing role as CoS. He fails to mention how trust had broken down as a result of Musharraf’s adventure in Kargil without taking the government on board beforehand. He also fails to ask the pertinent question- why did NS feel the need to suddenly fire Musharraf from his job in such a hurry.

    • @fajeradnan8607
      @fajeradnan8607 Рік тому

      it's a 15 minute video not a research paper

    • @wkhan5
      @wkhan5 Рік тому

      @@fajeradnan8607 what total BS.

    • @fajeradnan8607
      @fajeradnan8607 Рік тому

      @@wkhan5 ??????? bro grow up

    • @wkhan5
      @wkhan5 Рік тому

      @@fajeradnan8607 grow up!?? You’re making excuses for A 15 min video that essentially fails to ask relevant questions behind why the coup happened- no wonder the army can take over repeatedly with impunity and no wonder that people in our country never question the motives behind such fake overs. It’s

  • @sadiqhussain157
    @sadiqhussain157 5 місяців тому +1

    ھم سبکو نظریہ پاکستان کو مستحکم کرنے کی ضرورت ھے اسوقت ھمارا آٸین اسکا تحفظ نہیں کرسکتا اسی لیے سٕاست دان اپنی مرضی کرتے ھیں کھلتے ھیں آٸین سے

  • @MuhammadUsman-rm1po
    @MuhammadUsman-rm1po 2 роки тому +1

    Way forward ?

  • @Itsmiserable
    @Itsmiserable Рік тому +2

    I am confused, if you can kindly explain, please. If a war is won on the battleground, how can it be defeated on the table?
    Doesn't this mean that the war is not won at all, but the masses were fed with lies?

    • @fajeradnan8607
      @fajeradnan8607 Рік тому +2

      he just means we won the physical war but lost the political aspect of it. so yes, bas naam k jeetay hain, we lost more than we won.

    • @sandeshagowda1855
      @sandeshagowda1855 9 місяців тому

      ​@@fajeradnan8607fact is Pakistan lost physical war as well.. if this is the understanding of this man, think of students he is teaching or textbooks😂

  • @zahidraza188
    @zahidraza188 Місяць тому

    The influence of the military in Pakistan’s governance and institutions is a longstanding issue, with alleged US and Israeli influence.

  • @zaryabshah3268
    @zaryabshah3268 2 роки тому +3

    Glad that this channel have some bravery to show truth

  • @ManishMishra-mv5fp
    @ManishMishra-mv5fp 2 роки тому +7

    When one of the experts of your country says on record that the 3 institutions of the state that were created to run the country are, Executive, Judiciary and Military; instead of saying Executive, Legislature and Judiciary, then you are sure on the highway...highway to hell. Umm actually on CPEC;

    • @hjedits657
      @hjedits657 Рік тому +1

      He is talking about British Colonial setup of these 3 departments ..... unfortunately due to lack of Civilian leadership this setup carried on

    • @fajeradnan8607
      @fajeradnan8607 Рік тому

      just because you know the academic synonym of the word which the expert did not say, does not mean the expert has lost their expertise. and it's legislative by the way, not legislature. at least make sure k agar bakwas hi karni hai tou usmay hypocritical ghalatiyan na ho. cry about cpec all you want.

  • @FuadMalik
    @FuadMalik 2 роки тому +1

    Trilogy: Trill O Gee

  • @tehseenullah3082
    @tehseenullah3082 Рік тому

    Mashallah Great sir

  • @zaidisahabg
    @zaidisahabg 2 роки тому +2

    Question is why NS dismissed PM?

    • @noshadar
      @noshadar 5 місяців тому

      Because of Establishment.
      Because at that time PTI and establishment were at the same page

  • @mainone5822
    @mainone5822 Рік тому

    Pakistan military is the biggest reason of our bad economical situation.

  • @jawadkhan3401
    @jawadkhan3401 2 роки тому

    Wese to bhutto k elawa Raja qaiser sahab ka bhe charisma hai SPIR mein

  • @Amir-jq8bu
    @Amir-jq8bu Рік тому +1

    These Army generals destroyed our country. I love my Pak army but hate the top army generals.

  • @waqaralam3029
    @waqaralam3029 2 роки тому +7

    Chokedar choor ha

  • @mikeilagz
    @mikeilagz 2 роки тому +7

    You said Jinah Sahab instead of Quad-e-Azam ??? are you a Pakistani?

    • @shaheerzahid3845
      @shaheerzahid3845 2 роки тому +9

      Oh Bhai bas kar unka Naam Muhammad Ali Jinnah hi tha

    • @zaidisahabg
      @zaidisahabg 2 роки тому +4

      Hahaha bhai ye bhi alag hi level hai nashon ka 😂

  • @inayat-u-g3825
    @inayat-u-g3825 2 роки тому

    Bht dheela bnda hai yh

  • @waqaralam3029
    @waqaralam3029 2 роки тому

    es leya tho kahta hon es mulk ka wahidd Hall 10000 logon ko Qurbani owr 5 hazar ke jan lana hoga tub ye mulk azad hoga azadi ronee donee se owr manat samajt se na ajj tak melee ha na milthi ha

  • @pick565
    @pick565 2 роки тому +3

    Army is rootcause of all the problems

  • @shawalmoon3216
    @shawalmoon3216 Рік тому +1

    Pak army zindabad ❤️🇵🇰

  • @crazydweller7581
    @crazydweller7581 Рік тому

    he us wrong in saying india divided military assets equitably. It did not. Stop lying

    • @shaheerzahid3845
      @shaheerzahid3845 Рік тому +2

      He is right. We got 17% of total United India's wealth meanwhile we got 30% share of military. So yes military was very strong from beginning.

    • @crazydweller7581
      @crazydweller7581 Рік тому

      @@shaheerzahid3845 but the if the ratio is not same it does not mean it was equitable

    • @fajeradnan8607
      @fajeradnan8607 Рік тому +1

      @@crazydweller7581 he did not say it was equitable. he said it was only equitable in the case of military. the rest was unfair

    • @crazydweller7581
      @crazydweller7581 Рік тому

      @@fajeradnan8607 have u read my comment?? i think not

  • @tayyabazharmirza511
    @tayyabazharmirza511 Рік тому

    Sab kursi ke buke they

  • @user-fc8px7di6g
    @user-fc8px7di6g 3 місяці тому

    Bhikharistan 😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂

  • @muhammadsalehmaaz7050
    @muhammadsalehmaaz7050 2 роки тому +5

    Pak army zindabad

    • @waqaralam3029
      @waqaralam3029 2 роки тому +12

      Ghulam qoom aj tak es army ne deya kya ha es mulk ko

    • @maisondusavoir3600
      @maisondusavoir3600 2 роки тому +3

      @@waqaralam3029 batwara

    • @waqaralam3029
      @waqaralam3029 2 роки тому +1

      @@maisondusavoir3600 so 👍 ✔️

    • @kashilkashil8570
      @kashilkashil8570 2 роки тому

      Benasle kuttey Jo malik ko hi katey hain. 1 number army or agency, aaj mulk ki kya halat hai?

    • @ShahNawaz-yu7gf
      @ShahNawaz-yu7gf 8 місяців тому

      ​@@waqaralam3029agar dekho TU bohat Kuch dia hai lakin agar nai dekho TU apko apna AP bhi Nazar nai aye ga

  • @zohaibqatib
    @zohaibqatib 2 роки тому

    🤣 🤣 🤣 constitution tha nai....
    Samajh nahi ata do qoumi nazarya kis cancer ka nam tha.... Or
    Allama Iqbal or Quaid e Azam konsa nasha kartay thay k taqreer me Islaam ka zikar nikal ata tha......
    Had hai.. Bhaee Hypocrisy pr or Democray pr.

    • @hunter62207
      @hunter62207 Рік тому

      Dou quomi nazariya aaj India mein wazeh hai jahan masjidein tori jaati hain

    • @MaulanaUmerHasanQadri
      @MaulanaUmerHasanQadri Рік тому +1

      Do Qaumo Nazariyah Quran se Sabit hai.
      Millat e Ibrahim dekho.

  • @usmankaran7888
    @usmankaran7888 Рік тому

    Baised analysis...

  • @Hassanediting
    @Hassanediting Рік тому

    kasy kasy dhood kr ya videos banaty hn.. isa ziyada knowledge tu meray choty bhai ko, jisko politics ma intrest bhi nahi ha.... Foj rescuer ka tor pa ati ha... iska banda uu tor dy asy bakwas pa. in jasy chy logo ki waja sa foj humari gardono pa char ka bathi ha

    • @fajeradnan8607
      @fajeradnan8607 Рік тому +1

      bro just stop. you're acting like a part of the problem

    • @Hassanediting
      @Hassanediting Рік тому

      @Fajer Adnan bhai, cant ja or jooty chat

    • @fajeradnan8607
      @fajeradnan8607 Рік тому +1

      @@Hassanediting
      ? no. because i am not of a pro-generals view. baat tujhay video ki samajh nahi hai aur idher bhonknay lagay ho. banda bol raha hai k foj ne instability ka faida uthatay huay apnay aap kp rescuer k tor pr paesha kiya tou logo ko lagta hai k sirf wohi crisis sambhal sakta hai. unbiased fouj ko criticise kar raha hai. khud rescuer nahi maan raha bata raha hai k usnay kesay mouqon ko unfairly istamal kiya. adhi baat sun kr zubaan chalany paray ho