Hi sir! hope you will see this- In the JEON structure should we make our judgement (the first sentence) the same as what we believe in our introduction? e.g: Introduction- Ultimately, it was XYZ that was a massive factor in ______. Opening sentence in first para: XYZ undoubtedly was a significant factor in ____. I hope you understand. Should all of our opening sentences mirror our side of the argument and the counter argument always be the one we end up refuting? Will it still be balanced this way? Please reply!! thankyou !!
Hey great vid! Would it make sense to do 2 paras which are 'for' and one that is 'against' your judgement (counter-argument), or better to integrate the counter in the 3 main paras?
Should an AQA A-level essay question be written in the first person, please? e.g. "I disagree with this statement". Or should it always be written in third person? Thanks very much for any advice; getting confused by mixed messages.
Hi, I am really struggling with “change” questions that follow a large period of time, eg 25 years. I don’t really understand what the structure should be - should I structure the essay by ‘time’ paragraphs or by key concepts?
There's no right way to structure an essay. Just do what you feel is most comfortable for you. The point is the analysis of info and presenting arguments. Those are what get you level 5.
- 3 paragraphs - one judgement on the question for each paragraph backed up with historical evidence - then a judgement from the other side of what you initially argued -then go back to your original point and argue why the debating point you just made is less convincing than your first initial judgment of the question I think that’s how you do it
After the JEON structure how do I link it back to the question please?
Hi sir! hope you will see this- In the JEON structure should we make our judgement (the first sentence) the same as what we believe in our introduction?
e.g: Introduction- Ultimately, it was XYZ that was a massive factor in ______.
Opening sentence in first para: XYZ undoubtedly was a significant factor in ____.
I hope you understand. Should all of our opening sentences mirror our side of the argument and the counter argument always be the one we end up refuting? Will it still be balanced this way?
Please reply!! thankyou !!
Thank you very much sir! How long do you have to answer the essay questions? Also 2hr30?
Hey great vid! Would it make sense to do 2 paras which are 'for' and one that is 'against' your judgement (counter-argument), or better to integrate the counter in the 3 main paras?
Counter in the 3 main paras is best
Should an AQA A-level essay question be written in the first person, please? e.g. "I disagree with this statement". Or should it always be written in third person? Thanks very much for any advice; getting confused by mixed messages.
3rd person imo
hi did anyone tell you what's the right way
@@masumarahman2613 it should always be written in 3rd person, never write it in 1st person
thank you so much!!
Subscribed purely bc of the "you will have to do some bit of British history... unfortunately" 🤣🤣
Really useful thank you 🙏🏻
Hi, I am really struggling with “change” questions that follow a large period of time, eg 25 years. I don’t really understand what the structure should be - should I structure the essay by ‘time’ paragraphs or by key concepts?
There's no right way to structure an essay. Just do what you feel is most comfortable for you. The point is the analysis of info and presenting arguments. Those are what get you level 5.
Also, we have done an updated version of each these "how to answer" videos. Head over and see on the channel :))
hi, is thiis an a* essay structure because my teacher hasn't given us one, thankyou
@@LearningAcademy1 than you !
what about PEEL
how many paragraphs should i do for this in an essay?
also, do we need to analyse both counter-arguments and evidence?
- 3 paragraphs
- one judgement on the question for each paragraph backed up with historical evidence
- then a judgement from the other side of what you initially argued
-then go back to your original point and argue why the debating point you just made is less convincing than your first initial judgment of the question
I think that’s how you do it
heard more swallowing than talking.
was quite satisfying tbh