George Pitsounis I'm a Byzantine Roman descendant since my Italian Tuscan family lived in Constantinople in 550AD to 1453AD and lost 2 family members Mateo brothers while defending the city with their Emperor Constantine XI and send their last message to the family saying "We rather die with the Emperor as Romans than Turkish slaves and pray for us and to God. Farewell and May God be with you".
Byzantine Soldier Beautiful story my friend! It's really great to know as many things about your familie's past. Personally I hail from trebizond epirus and morea.
They look very similiar to the Rus (Armors). Also the Eastern Roman empire was Greco-Roman but they used greek language as their tongue, Byzantine is a wrong name, it's the Eastern Roman Empire, they considerated themselves as Romans.
Radamanthis1776 More like Rus look similar to byzantines. That is for the later medieval period after the christianization of the Rus. And yes i complete agree with you. The reason I decided to include byzantine in the title is for convenience reasons
I agree with you about the look of the Rus, lots of them served as mercenaries and some of them formed part of the Varangian guard, it's normal that when they were back home they implemented a lot of things that they had learned from the Romans, like the adoption of their faith.
@ὁ Κατάφρακτος I can't understand fellow Greeks. Why is it shame to say they were Roman-Greeks? It was probably mixed Romans and Greeks, many Romans moved to the Eastern part during all those years and intermixed with the majority Greek population. Example saint Helena mother of Constantinous the Great. She was Greek.
Can we all just take a moment and appreciate Justinian? He was the last Byzantine emperor that could dream of Rome and had the heart of a true Roman emperor. Hail Justinian and his mighty general Belisarius!
Ορθοδοξη ελπιζω.Γιατι ρωμαικη δν θελουμε.Για αυτο ο Θεος εγκατελειψε την Πολη.Μιαναν με αιρεσεις και προδοσιες και πολιτικα και οικονομικα σκανδαλα οι παπικοι λατινοι την Αγια Σοφια και ολη την Πολη.
Huh. It's suprising to see a Greek student so interested in Byzantine stuff. Always thought you guys saw the ancient Hellenic period as "superior" and Byzantine history wasn't taught at Greek schools. Am I mistaken? Of course I understand the sentiment. The modern Greek state was born due to the Hellenophilia of the Western world. Without the support of the West, it's likely that the Greek rebellion would fail sooner than later. So it made no sense for the Greek state to search it's identity in the medieval Roman state, which, at the time, was viewed by most historians as "decadent, corrupt, Greek-led Roman wannabe state". But, as far as I know, the emphasis was always on the ancient Hellene history and continued to do so at least towards the post WW2 era.That's why I assumed that even to this day, Greek students rarely learn anything Byzantine related. But then again, Byzantine history is also a part of Greek history and culture and to negate it entirely would be wrong. So, how much does the average student learn about the medieval Rome? How much the wider public know? When it comes to history, do people assiociate themselves with the Byzantines at all? I assume that at least Byzantine poetry is read, so there's that. I'm not Greek, but if I was, I think I would've been more proud to be a descendant of Romans than some ancient Athenians. Not that I dislike democracy and all, but both them and other various Hellenic republic seem... overrated nowadays? I remember that I stumbled upon you some time ago (might be even a year or more, I don't know). I wish I was as knowledgeable as you are, I am merely a Byzantine enthousiast, having never learned about it at all, most of what I know comes from my own research and (mostly) from that excellent Byzantine podcast by Robin Pierson. But I must say, that discussing with you, it made me buy some sources about the Byzantium literally right now. :P So thanks for that. Didn't know this video was yours, I watched it some two years ago when I was searching for some Byzantine armour. Maybe we'll see each other again in the comments. Cheers.
Your historical observations regarding the formation of the modern greek state and its archaeolatry are very true so i will adress your questions directly. Whilst byzantine history is taught at schools ,it is a very brief mashup of it ,if you will. Justinian-Heracleus-Iconoclasm-1204 and then straight to 1453. Whilst there are brief mentions of the in between periods ,these are the only ones that are taught in greater detail . It is a very sad affair that so many great dynasties and events are looked over. When it comes to universities that associate with history/archaelogy and religion however the education on the byzantine empire offered seems sufficient so at least there is that. The education offered and the way it is offered in schools doesnt really make kids have an interest in history and even moreso at the most important and recent part of our history which is the byzantine empiree. The adult population seems to be more knowledgeable about it whilst a mediocre amount of youth(that shares more "nationalistic" views) at least feels proud about it. I myself inherited the passion for it from my father and the more i started reading about it ,the more i became fascinated by it as i gradually understood what a misunderstood and overlooked period of history it is. Granted in the past few decades it seems the empire is gradually getting the attention it deserves by western scholarship too. I totally also agree with you on the next point. Being greek i feel much more proud about Rhomania , a unified state and a great empire from whom we greeks have inherited our culture and religion. It is our immediate ancestor that we owe our existance and the things that define us to, not some classical city state or bronze age mycenae. As for democracy i believe it is a rather mature and extremely difficult to achieve concept and i support more practical forms of government but thats a discussion for a different day :). Im really glad to see that i managed to further your interest even by little :). There is one issue with the video as scrolling through the images id use in it i didnt notice i accidentally put a pic of sassanids in there so SOS for that. We seem to watch similar youtube channels so we might indeed :D. Thank you for your comment
We are proud of our history all of it i am proud that my ancestors were The greek tribes athenians macedonians spartans and i am also proud that our nation established in roman empire and rule the eastern part of it for so many years you see every greek is very proud for his history many nation if you call them with their country name like you are albanian african etc they will feel offended and say that you are a racist only the greeks will not remember that
@@eziocantella4482 i never said greeks established the Roman Empire...but Romans took many things and learn many things from Greeks and we are proud that we took part in Roman History Rome fell 1454 us Pontians Turks still call us Romans we call our language wich is a bit different from neo greek Roman we Speak Roman Or Romeika and we call our land Romania (Rome) 🇬🇷🇮🇹🦅Roma invicta
The longest running European Empire, a Greek Orthodox and Greek speaking one . Long live the memory of our beloved glorious Emperor Constantine XI , . Long live the memory of our beloved King Constantine II XIII . . Long live the Greek military forces. Long live Crown 👑 Prince Pavlos of Greece ✝️🇬🇷🌹 The kingdom -- Empire will be back sooner than squatters in our beloved Asia Minor think and go back to where they came from. Jesus Christ ✝️ is King 👑 of kings and Lord of lords .see you soon in Hagia Sophia ✝️✝️✝️🇬🇷🌹
Justinian should never have ordered the reconquest of the western provinces. If he just consolidated what he already got the empire would have had more money and resources to hold off the Persians and Arabs. Who knows, maybe he could have bought the empire another 200-500 years of its existence
Sorry for the late reply .Indeed ,looking at it from a modern perspective it is easy to come to such a conclusion but we have to look at the matter from his perspective. It is easy to understand that it was always a dream of the romans to restore their old imperial provinces.Not even 100 years had gone by since the fall of Rome in 476. Now Justinian also run into some unfortunate circumstances that he could not predict. Conquests in the long term are a good thing and source of income but Justinian couldnt have predicted the so called "Justinian's plague" or extremely unfavourable for the crops weather which came as a result of a volcanic explosion and resulted in crop failures.These two major events exhausted and depleted the empire's resources and manpower much more than his wars did .Also no one could predict the unification and emergence of the Arabs or islam not even by the final and devastating Byzantine-Sassanid war which allowed for the Arabic Expansion. Alas no one can tell what the future brings but regardless of what happened next one must give credit where credit is due and must admire the exceptional work and conquests of Justinian and his most capable Generals Belisarius,Narses and Mundus.
Taking back north africa was a greate idea ( lots of grain, resources and control over the western mediteranian commerce) , the italian campain was a 20 years desaster the only way to describe it is the ROMAN VIETNAM, and the over extention in hispania was a mistake too. Justinian should of finish off the persians and then concentrate on the reconquest of the west, The Eastern Roman army with Belisarius at the help wood of wipe the floor with the franks and the visigoths , imagine today all of us will still be speaking latin and greek!.
George Pitsounis so you guys will try to convert or kill turks ? Do you know that most of the people in western turkey are assimilated greek speaking people including me ;)
we would never kill turkish civiliians but try to convert them back to their real religion to the religion which there ancestors died for in constantinople
How? They defeated the persians in their last war which war is the major reason for the initial arab success. They also fought off the arabs in 718 annihilating their army something that lead to the fall of the united arab caliphate. Ever since 718 and especially after Basil I took the throne they won the overwhelming majority of wars and were never again significantly threatened by the arabs till their 2 worlds lost contact.(Byzantine resurgence period)
George Pitsounis what? No they didn’t in 718 the Byzantine empire literally only held Anatolia and Greece. The Rashidun Caliphate invaded Syria, Iraq, Iran, Armenia, Israel, Egypt, and North Africa and they barely lost any battles to the Byzantines while taking these lands. And the reason the Ummayads fell wasn’t due to any Byzantine causes it was because the Abbasid Revolution occurred and many non-Arabs across the caliphate rose up and overthrew their Ummayad rulers. In 806 the Abbasids invaded Asia Minor and defeated the Byzantines so badly that Emperor Nikephoros began to pay annual tribute. Eventually the Abbasid Caliphate fell as well, but the Byzantines don’t get credit for this. Instead it was a combination of political infighting between religious sects of Islam, the Ummayads still holding power in Spain, North African Berbers and Seljuk Turks seeking independence, issues with Shia Muslims in Persia, and the egg that broke the camels back: a Mongol invasion in the 1240s.
George Pitsounis as for the Persian wars, I mean like ok sure they won the last war but looking at the entirety of the Byzantine-Sasanian Wars the Persians were kinda in a state of kicking ass most of the time. And while it’s true that the wars would result in Persia’s weakening which led to the losses sustained by the Arab invasions the Romans had a shitty time too with all the economic depressions and being unable to hold onto the Balkans or their Middle Eastern provinces. Matter of fact, their resurgence wouldn’t have been possible if not for the weakening of the Mongol Empire
@@peterfishman7862 You make your assumptions based on a map without taking into account the greater geopolitical context and or history for that matter. In 718 the empire held lands in the balkans, italy and anatolia(anatolia was its most important territory that was really developed and very rich). The arabs only saw success due to the last byzantine-sassanid war and the jewish revolt that aided the sassanids in their last endeavour. And lest we forget you ,said couldnt HOLD OFF. Well they DID. They crushed the arabs in 718 bringing an end to the united arab caliphate. From this point and on they would dominate over the arabs in the majority of wars until their two worlds lost contact. Last time i checked a dictionary for the word hold off that counts as one. As for the sassanid wars again you are factually wrong. The sassanids never made long term victories against the romans nor were "kicking ass" most of the time. The wars were a back and forth at best with the byzantines coming out on top in the majority of wars this being the Byzantine-Sasanian War of 572-591, the Byzantine-Sassanid War of 602-628, the Anastasian War and the War for the Caucasus. The rest were pretty much draws that maintained the status quo. And again by definition of the term "hold off" the byzantines more than managed to hold off the persians.
@@ΡωμανόςΔ́Διογένης-θ6δ With out Rome and without Romans, it's like removing England from the British Empire, it's no longer the British Empire, its whatever it evolves into. Its called the Byzantine Empire for a Reason and it was mostly Greek.
@@ΡωμανόςΔ́Διογένης-θ6δ You seem to have tinted glasses on causing a bias perspective. The reality is - During the Byzantine period, peoples of Greek ethnicity and identity were the majority occupying the urban centres of the Empire, facts. We can look to cities such as Alexandria, Antioch, Thessalonica and, of course, Constantinople as the largest concentrations of Greek population and identity, that's the truth. It was what was left of the mostly Greek Eastern side of the Empire. And no - The British Empire was nothing without London which was where the heart of power came from, its identity ect.
Inheritors of the ancient Roman legions and keepers of that priceless legacy.
I hope one day to see Constantinople liberated and to see Hagia Sophia return to the Orthodox Church and Byzantine Empire rise again from the ashes.
Byzantine Soldier That would be the greatest day ever since the fall
George Pitsounis I'm a Byzantine Roman descendant since my Italian Tuscan family lived in Constantinople in 550AD to 1453AD and lost 2 family members Mateo brothers while defending the city with their Emperor Constantine XI and send their last message to the family saying "We rather die with the Emperor as Romans than Turkish slaves and pray for us and to God. Farewell and May God be with you".
George Pitsounis do you have a Xbox one?
Byzantine Soldier Beautiful story my friend! It's really great to know as many things about your familie's past. Personally I hail from trebizond epirus and morea.
Byzantine Soldier I'm afraid I dont have Xbox 1
long live byzantine it will rise again!!!!!! nova roma!!!!!! greece forever!!!!!
Greetings to all Greeks from the land of Βαριάγοι! May our peoples rise to glory once again.
Greetings from greece my friend!
“Βαραγκοί” aka Varaghi ( Varangians )
@@DaimonaCGreetings from to all true Christians Greeks from where I live. 🐊🌴🐸🐍
Ah, my ancestors! How glorious they were! Great vid!
Ι am a greek byzantine from Asia Minor thanks for the video thank you all
They look very similiar to the Rus (Armors). Also the Eastern Roman empire was Greco-Roman but they used greek language as their tongue, Byzantine is a wrong name, it's the Eastern Roman Empire, they considerated themselves as Romans.
Radamanthis1776 More like Rus look similar to byzantines. That is for the later medieval period after the christianization of the Rus. And yes i complete agree with you. The reason I decided to include byzantine in the title is for convenience reasons
I agree with you about the look of the Rus, lots of them served as mercenaries and some of them formed part of the Varangian guard, it's normal that when they were back home they implemented a lot of things that they had learned from the Romans, like the adoption of their faith.
The didn’t considered themselves “Romans” they were actually Romans. The last Romans...
@@alonsopochon3246 roman meant Christian Greek
Meanwhile hellene meant pagan peasant villager
@ὁ Κατάφρακτος I can't understand fellow Greeks. Why is it shame to say they were Roman-Greeks? It was probably mixed Romans and Greeks, many Romans moved to the Eastern part during all those years and intermixed with the majority Greek population. Example saint Helena mother of Constantinous the Great. She was Greek.
Can we all just take a moment and appreciate Justinian? He was the last Byzantine emperor that could dream of Rome and had the heart of a true Roman emperor.
Hail Justinian and his mighty general Belisarius!
ήρθε ο καιρός για μια καινούργια σταυροφορία..την χρειαζόμαστε πιο πολύ από ποτέ..εύχομαι ολλη αδέρφια μου να χετε την ευλογία του θεου
gym Ειλικρινά πια την χρειαζόμαστε. Η μεγαλύτερη ειρωνεία είναι ότι δεν κατά στρεφόμαστε από πόλεμο αλλά εκ των έσω. Ο Θεός μαζί σου
Ορθοδοξη ελπιζω.Γιατι ρωμαικη δν θελουμε.Για αυτο ο Θεος εγκατελειψε την Πολη.Μιαναν με αιρεσεις και προδοσιες και πολιτικα και οικονομικα σκανδαλα οι παπικοι λατινοι την Αγια Σοφια και ολη την Πολη.
We must take back Κωνσταντινούπολη !
one day !
George Pitsounis I’m hoping someone has a plan for that?! Or there’s some type of United revolution happening for this
Huh. It's suprising to see a Greek student so interested in Byzantine stuff. Always thought you guys saw the ancient Hellenic period as "superior" and Byzantine history wasn't taught at Greek schools. Am I mistaken?
Of course I understand the sentiment. The modern Greek state was born due to the Hellenophilia of the Western world. Without the support of the West, it's likely that the Greek rebellion would fail sooner than later. So it made no sense for the Greek state to search it's identity in the medieval Roman state, which, at the time, was viewed by most historians as "decadent, corrupt, Greek-led Roman wannabe state". But, as far as I know, the emphasis was always on the ancient Hellene history and continued to do so at least towards the post WW2 era.That's why I assumed that even to this day, Greek students rarely learn anything Byzantine related. But then again, Byzantine history is also a part of Greek history and culture and to negate it entirely would be wrong.
So, how much does the average student learn about the medieval Rome? How much the wider public know? When it comes to history, do people assiociate themselves with the Byzantines at all? I assume that at least Byzantine poetry is read, so there's that.
I'm not Greek, but if I was, I think I would've been more proud to be a descendant of Romans than some ancient Athenians. Not that I dislike democracy and all, but both them and other various Hellenic republic seem... overrated nowadays?
I remember that I stumbled upon you some time ago (might be even a year or more, I don't know). I wish I was as knowledgeable as you are, I am merely a Byzantine enthousiast, having never learned about it at all, most of what I know comes from my own research and (mostly) from that excellent Byzantine podcast by Robin Pierson. But I must say, that discussing with you, it made me buy some sources about the Byzantium literally right now. :P So thanks for that. Didn't know this video was yours, I watched it some two years ago when I was searching for some Byzantine armour. Maybe we'll see each other again in the comments.
Cheers.
Your historical observations regarding the formation of the modern greek state and its archaeolatry are very true so i will adress your questions directly.
Whilst byzantine history is taught at schools ,it is a very brief mashup of it ,if you will. Justinian-Heracleus-Iconoclasm-1204 and then straight to 1453. Whilst there are brief mentions of the in between periods ,these are the only ones that are taught in greater detail . It is a very sad affair that so many great dynasties and events are looked over. When it comes to universities that associate with history/archaelogy and religion however the education on the byzantine empire offered seems sufficient so at least there is that. The education offered and the way it is offered in schools doesnt really make kids have an interest in history and even moreso at the most important and recent part of our history which is the byzantine empiree. The adult population seems to be more knowledgeable about it whilst a mediocre amount of youth(that shares more "nationalistic" views) at least feels proud about it. I myself inherited the passion for it from my father and the more i started reading about it ,the more i became fascinated by it as i gradually understood what a misunderstood and overlooked period of history it is. Granted in the past few decades it seems the empire is gradually getting the attention it deserves by western scholarship too.
I totally also agree with you on the next point. Being greek i feel much more proud about Rhomania , a unified state and a great empire from whom we greeks have inherited our culture and religion. It is our immediate ancestor that we owe our existance and the things that define us to, not some classical city state or bronze age mycenae. As for democracy i believe it is a rather mature and extremely difficult to achieve concept and i support more practical forms of government but thats a discussion for a different day :).
Im really glad to see that i managed to further your interest even by little :). There is one issue with the video as scrolling through the images id use in it i didnt notice i accidentally put a pic of sassanids in there so SOS for that. We seem to watch similar youtube channels so we might indeed :D. Thank you for your comment
We are proud of our history all of it i am proud that my ancestors were The greek tribes athenians macedonians spartans and i am also proud that our nation established in roman empire and rule the eastern part of it for so many years you see every greek is very proud for his history many nation if you call them with their country name like you are albanian african etc they will feel offended and say that you are a racist only the greeks will not remember that
@Jotaro97 Oh, so the Greeks love them so much they use the name wrongfully imposed upon them by the Westerners?
@@ΒασιληςΠαναγιωτιδης-ξ7π Greek brother you didn't establish the Roman empire , you inherit the eastern part
@@eziocantella4482 i never said greeks established the Roman Empire...but Romans took many things and learn many things from Greeks and we are proud that we took part in Roman History Rome fell 1454 us Pontians Turks still call us Romans we call our language wich is a bit different from neo greek Roman we Speak Roman Or Romeika and we call our land Romania (Rome) 🇬🇷🇮🇹🦅Roma invicta
Last emperor (palaiologos) would be proud for our a days Greek people, because the greeks are the real Romans, ( the sons of second Rome)
Verry beautiful love from Lebanon 🌹
MY LONG LOST BROTHER IN PFP, I HAVE FINALY FOUND YOU
Who would say we are both rome lovers too
My brother from another mother
I'm very romantic about this lost Eastern empire. I think their death made their empire eternal.
The longest running European Empire, a Greek Orthodox and Greek speaking one . Long live the memory of our beloved glorious Emperor Constantine XI , . Long live the memory of our beloved King Constantine II XIII . . Long live the Greek military forces. Long live Crown 👑 Prince Pavlos of Greece ✝️🇬🇷🌹 The kingdom -- Empire will be back sooner than squatters in our beloved Asia Minor think and go back to where they came from. Jesus Christ ✝️ is King 👑 of kings and Lord of lords .see you soon in Hagia Sophia ✝️✝️✝️🇬🇷🌹
My god.... Cruseder kings II. Romans wake up!
Nice.
Thank you, its nothing special to be honest.I like your videos as well
S.P.Q.R
ΕΊΣΑΙ ΜΕΓΆΛΟΣ ΚΑΙ ΑΛΗΘΙΝΟΣ ΕΛΛΗΝΑΣ 🔝🔝🔝🔙🔙💪💪💪
Imagine if the Byzantine empire and the Holy Roman Empire united ? That's one of hell of an empire.
Do you think the catholic and orthodox christians would unite back then.
Justinian should never have ordered the reconquest of the western provinces. If he just consolidated what he already got the empire would have had more money and resources to hold off the Persians and Arabs. Who knows, maybe he could have bought the empire another 200-500 years of its existence
Sorry for the late reply .Indeed ,looking at it from a modern perspective it is easy to come to such a conclusion but we have to look at the matter from his perspective. It is easy to understand that it was always a dream of the romans to restore their old imperial provinces.Not even 100 years had gone by since the fall of Rome in 476. Now Justinian also run into some unfortunate circumstances that he could not predict. Conquests in the long term are a good thing and source of income but Justinian couldnt have predicted the so called "Justinian's plague" or extremely unfavourable for the crops weather which came as a result of a volcanic explosion and resulted in crop failures.These two major events exhausted and depleted the empire's resources and manpower much more than his wars did .Also no one could predict the unification and emergence of the Arabs or islam not even by the final and devastating Byzantine-Sassanid war which allowed for the Arabic Expansion. Alas no one can tell what the future brings but regardless of what happened next one must give credit where credit is due and must admire the exceptional work and conquests of Justinian and his most capable Generals Belisarius,Narses and Mundus.
Taking back north africa was a greate idea ( lots of grain, resources and control over the western mediteranian commerce) , the italian campain was a 20 years desaster the only way to describe it is the ROMAN VIETNAM, and the over extention in hispania was a mistake too.
Justinian should of finish off the persians and then concentrate on the reconquest of the west, The Eastern Roman army with Belisarius at the help wood of wipe the floor with the franks and the visigoths , imagine today all of us will still be speaking latin and greek!.
Amazing
name of the song please ? very very beautiful
kamel sexy both songs are in the description but here you go anyway.
Ck2- Legacy of Rome
Ck2- Main theme
The NEW ROMAN LEGIONS ,And Russia Inherited the Emblem....
nice vedeo
thank you !
what about christian turks they are bad or good ?
So long as they are christian its fine by me.At the end of the day culture and religion are important than ethnicity.
George Pitsounis so you guys will try to convert or kill turks ?
Do you know that most of the people in western turkey are assimilated greek speaking people including me ;)
we would never kill turkish civiliians but try to convert them back to their real religion to the religion which there ancestors died for in constantinople
They remind me of those Kievan guys in Warhammer..
anyone got the lyrics?
L' Impero Romano d'Oriente
Rome has fallen, Constantinople has fallen, Moscow is left. Moscow is the third and greatest Rome and it will never fall
Moscow isn't a successor and will never be worthy enough to consider itself as such
That's what they thought about Constantinople everything gas a beginning and an end eventually
Ah yes the Byzantine empire. Shame they couldn’t fight off a few Persians and Arabs.
How? They defeated the persians in their last war which war is the major reason for the initial arab success. They also fought off the arabs in 718 annihilating their army something that lead to the fall of the united arab caliphate. Ever since 718 and especially after Basil I took the throne they won the overwhelming majority of wars and were never again significantly threatened by the arabs till their 2 worlds lost contact.(Byzantine resurgence period)
George Pitsounis what? No they didn’t in 718 the Byzantine empire literally only held Anatolia and Greece. The Rashidun Caliphate invaded Syria, Iraq, Iran, Armenia, Israel, Egypt, and North Africa and they barely lost any battles to the Byzantines while taking these lands. And the reason the Ummayads fell wasn’t due to any Byzantine causes it was because the Abbasid Revolution occurred and many non-Arabs across the caliphate rose up and overthrew their Ummayad rulers. In 806 the Abbasids invaded Asia Minor and defeated the Byzantines so badly that Emperor Nikephoros began to pay annual tribute. Eventually the Abbasid Caliphate fell as well, but the Byzantines don’t get credit for this. Instead it was a combination of political infighting between religious sects of Islam, the Ummayads still holding power in Spain, North African Berbers and Seljuk Turks seeking independence, issues with Shia Muslims in Persia, and the egg that broke the camels back: a Mongol invasion in the 1240s.
George Pitsounis as for the Persian wars, I mean like ok sure they won the last war but looking at the entirety of the Byzantine-Sasanian Wars the Persians were kinda in a state of kicking ass most of the time. And while it’s true that the wars would result in Persia’s weakening which led to the losses sustained by the Arab invasions the Romans had a shitty time too with all the economic depressions and being unable to hold onto the Balkans or their Middle Eastern provinces. Matter of fact, their resurgence wouldn’t have been possible if not for the weakening of the Mongol Empire
@@peterfishman7862 You make your assumptions based on a map without taking into account the greater geopolitical context and or history for that matter. In 718 the empire held lands in the balkans, italy and anatolia(anatolia was its most important territory that was really developed and very rich). The arabs only saw success due to the last byzantine-sassanid war and the jewish revolt that aided the sassanids in their last endeavour. And lest we forget you ,said couldnt HOLD OFF. Well they DID. They crushed the arabs in 718 bringing an end to the united arab caliphate. From this point and on they would dominate over the arabs in the majority of wars until their two worlds lost contact. Last time i checked a dictionary for the word hold off that counts as one.
As for the sassanid wars again you are factually wrong. The sassanids never made long term victories against the romans nor were "kicking ass" most of the time. The wars were a back and forth at best with the byzantines coming out on top in the majority of wars this being the Byzantine-Sasanian War of 572-591, the Byzantine-Sassanid War of 602-628, the Anastasian War
and the War for the Caucasus. The rest were pretty much draws that maintained the status quo. And again by definition of the term "hold off" the byzantines more than managed to hold off the persians.
I would humbly advise you do greater research to avoid such rookie mistakes in the future
Not really the Roman Empire..
@@ΡωμανόςΔ́Διογένης-θ6δ With out Rome and without Romans, it's like removing England from the British Empire, it's no longer the British Empire, its whatever it evolves into. Its called the Byzantine Empire for a Reason and it was mostly Greek.
@@ΡωμανόςΔ́Διογένης-θ6δ You seem to have tinted glasses on causing a bias perspective.
The reality is - During the Byzantine period, peoples of Greek ethnicity and identity were the majority occupying the urban centres of the Empire, facts. We can look to cities such as Alexandria, Antioch, Thessalonica and, of course, Constantinople as the largest concentrations of Greek population and identity, that's the truth. It was what was left of the mostly Greek Eastern side of the Empire.
And no - The British Empire was nothing without London which was where the heart of power came from, its identity ect.
@@Anglo-Brit well it was continued by actual roman emperors plus tge roman name had stopped being used to describe ethnicities anyway
@@wankawanka3053 Only titles, they were not Romans at all though though. Not even the same culture.
@@Anglo-Brit sorry to break it to you but rome had stopped being ethnically roman for years