iPhone 15 Pro MAX vs $10,000 “REAL” Camera: Can the 5X Lens Shoot SPORTS Like Apple Claims?
Вставка
- Опубліковано 28 тра 2024
- FROPACK4 is HERE with 14 all-new custom Lightroom presets!!! Check it out
froknowsphoto.com/fropack4/ (40% OFF)
When Apple announced their iPhone 15 Pro Max with Tetra Prism 5x zooming lens...they also said it would be perfect for capturing sports action. Since they made the claim, I set out to review the 5x zoom lens, which is the equivalent of 120mm, against a "Real" camera and lens set to 120mm. I took the phone and real camera into the Real World to Photograph a Major League Baseball game, and these were my results.
Listen to RAWtalk, the FroKnowsPhoto Podcast wherever you listen to your podcasts. Or head on over to froknowsphoto.com/podcast
This video was filmed with the Canon EOS R5 and RF Canon Lenses Canon.us/r5fro
If you're ordering gear, please support us by making a purchase via our affiliate links below.
Allen's Camera allenscamera.com?aff=fro
B+H bhpho.to/3llp9ss
Amazon amzn.to/46uNsH1
Order a Bernie Photo Book right here www.berniephotobook.com/buy
Download MyGearVault, it's FREE and the best way to keep track of all your camera gear, receipts, prices paid, date purchased and more mygearvault.com/#download
Get a FREE Guide To Capturing Motion In Low Light Situations froknowsphoto.com/ (look for the orange box)
Want to send us gifts, swag, letters...here's our P.O. BOX
PO Box 3715 Philadelphia, PA 19125
USE CODE FroKnowsPhoto at squarespace.com/froknowsphoto to get your 14 day FREE Trial.
Gear I USE
I SHOOT RAW T-Shirts store.froknowsphoto.com/
I support Allen's Camera a mom-and-pop Camera store that's been around since 1977. allenscamera.com/fro
My Go To Mirrorless Camera for Stills
Canon R3 bit.ly/3hzfJVl Allen's Camera
Sony a1 amzn.to/2NHsm55 or bit.ly/3ccKZrt
SIGMA 35mm f1.2 amzn.to/2rLO8Jr (FAVE LENS)
Our go to Cameras for Recording Videos at FroKnowsPhoto
Canon EOS R5 amzn.to/37GQQ5R or bit.ly/2Obaj40
Canon EOS R6 amzn.to/3m6JHQ9 or bit.ly/38GIdXt
The Microphone I use for Vlogging bit.ly/2LWGRPq
My Rolling Bag Of Choice For Flying bit.ly/2LNsHRK
Follow me
►UA-cam: bit.ly/frotube
►Facebook: / froknowsphoto
►Instagram: / jaredpolin
►Twitter: / froknowsphoto
Please help us continue to make FREE content
by purchasing one or all of the FroKnowsPhoto
Educational guides. To check out previews of
each guide click here.
►froknowsphoto.com/guides
iPhone 15 pro max, canon, nikon
#FroKnowsPhoto #JaredPolin #iphone15promax
Professional photography equipment isn't just about getting great image quality. It's about getting great image quality in any situation.
I know right... consistently great pic in any moment, not only few 'nice' pictures
iPhone can take pictures in almost every possible situation.
@@stevemuzak8526 lol iphone sucks. you'll never know that if you don't get your hands on a real camera.
@@stevemuzak8526any phone can take pictures in any condition but they are taking about good picture quality in any condition 👍
@@stevemuzak8526not really. Wildlife (birds in flight) and macro are just not the same. Low light long exposure. Sunburst shots…etc etc
"If that F doesn't show up..." then you're effed.
(Edit: props to Jared. As someone who's tried shooting baseball with a phone, his shots were crazy good for what he took them with. I know I couldn't do that.)
Idk. I understand the direct comparison of 120mm vs 120mm.
But the advantage of a dedicated camera is the ability to zoom with optics and change lenses.
Like, yeah, phone sensors have come a long ways. But any sensor looks nice in good light or kept at base iso.
Use the 5x at night, and then compare. But that's just me.
Also, why not do an iPhone vs same cost photography setup comparison? Including used gear prices.
Could get a D750 or D810 and 70-200mm for the 1500 of the iPhone.
I know a photographer will most likely never trade their camera and lenses for a phone. But someone might be considering a phone or a camera, and showing the true differences and limits might be enough to push them to pick up photography
Yes, I thinking of a comparison of a much lower cost real camera and lens.
just wanted to leave the same comment. Nobody needs a Z9 to make those photos... even an old brick like the D3s (that's what I'm shooting) can make those pictures look like the Z9
I was going to post something similar.
As far as I can see the 120mm iPhone setup is only 12MP so an older FX or DX Nikon setup with a used 70-200 would a contender here.
New Sony 6700 is $1400 cheaper than phone even with a prime. Would be a great comparison
Was thinking the same thing, a D810 with a 70-200 VR1 is a 1400€ setup.
Love this comparison! Shows how far phone cameras have come, but also shows the reason why "real" camera are needed for sports if you want to get the best quality.
They're comparing a pro camera to an Apple product. That's like comparing an elite steakhouse to a McDonald's in the hood. Why are we talking about a 5x camera on a worthless iPhone when Samsung has been using far better 10x lenses on their phones for nearly half a decade? What a joke.
@@skankytrick because he's using an iPhone with 5x zoom which is what most of his audience including photographers use. Samsung is fine. Pixel is fine. But he's using an iPhone.
@@skankytrick- because it isn’t. The lens on the Samsung is garbage.
@@skankytrick bro really out here trynna say that samsung 10x is actually usable at all lmfao
@@roadrunner76b The Samsung 10x lens is literally one of the worst. Noisy at lowest ISO and still soft
I’m kind of glad to hear this review. I’ve been shooting on pro cams for years, and frankly I’m kind of worn out from the cumbersome process of lugging a big cam around, dumping huge batches, and forcing myself to go back and edit photos from something where the moment has way passed. I’m kind of generally uninspired. I just recently ordered a 15 pro max upgrading from an XR. I’m kind of excited to see what I can get when the mood strikes me and it’s in my pocket, rather than loading up my gear and trying to “go get something”. I certainly won’t be getting rid of my pro cams, but I’m looking forward to having something pretty capable in my pocket at all times.
what a good comparision video, well explained, tks mate, great content!
Excellent comparison! Thank you for the detailed information.
Finally, I’ve been waiting for this. Thanks.
Super fun video !! Thanks for this.
Great take on this Jared. Love, and agree with your comments regarding this.
Thank you. I am thinking about getting the 15pro plus and your reasons for doing so mirrored my own thoughts. Very helpful!
Great video Jared , loved the comparison. I am still very touched by the presentation you made talking about your mum. Thank you for your work
Very well explained... thank you.
Thank You. It is all about end photo enjoyment.
I actually didn't have any trouble finding which one was the Iphone in your comparisons : it always has more grain (or oversharpening - hard to tell as you're not zooming in), the bokeh is sometimes terrible, and the "real" camera shows the same amount of details while being a lot softer and natural to my eyes ...
It would have been cool to compare it to a $1500 camera setup, like a D610 and a good used lens :)
You are totally right. Iphone doesn't produce a real bokeh. It just blurs parts of picture and it looks mushy like Jared usually would call it. Especially lights which are out of focus don't look that natural
I agree for the price comparison. with 1500$ you can get a D810 and 70-200 2.8 VR1
Thanks for showing some motion. The difference in the bat and the ball was what I was looking for.
Very nice presentation thanks Jared
Great job, I have been waiting for this video. I think you hit the nail on the head with the iPhone. Great job to you and Steven.
That's a great comparison. Family loves taking phone photos but they also have some photo gear. I've shot weddings and events professionally for 13 years so it was pretty straightforward (colors, bokeh style, focusing "style") to nail the iPhone vs Camera shots every time. That isn't to diminish what mobile cameras are achieving because it's pretty nuts; but it's also nice to see a down-to-Earth video showing a challenging and fair comparison in an easy to understand way.
Great information. I did not know about the F.
Great video, it helps me to see the performance of the new iPhone Pro 15. Thanks!
Amazing content on the iPhone! Thanks for posting.
This is what I wanted to see for a long time. You are the 1st person who makes a video on this ❤
I got an iPhone 13 Pro 2 years ago think it’s fantastic. I have use cases for the iPhone, use cases for my mirrorless gear, and even use cases for my old Canon PowerShot S110. I think you illustrate that it’s about knowing the basics of photography and being familiar with the gear you have available.
120mm (full frame equivalent) is a native focal length of the iPhone, but imagine you need to go a little wider. At 100mm you need to use the 24mm lens and apply a heavy crop. You will only use 5.76% of that already very tiny sensor. That is less than 1/1000 of the sensor size of full frame.
Fundamentally misunderstands the nature of computational processing in order to justify spending 4 figures on a fringe use case lens that will weigh 2-3 pounds. If you regularly need 100mm you already know it and no video is going to convince you one way or the other. Otherwise you're working backwards from your conclusions.
Thanks so much for posting a great comparison video with the new iPhone 15 Pro Max and a full frame Nikon with equivalent focal length lens setting. I’ve shot sports with a full frame Nikon and a 300 mm Nikon lens and had many great shots but there have been many occasions when I didn’t have all my gear along for the ride. What I did have was my iPhone. It’s nice to at least have something to capture the moment. I’m so glad to see the improvements that Apple has made with their cameras in the Pro Max model. My point here is that the best camera is the one you have with you at the moment. Sometimes, that’s just a lowly cellphone. 🤷🏻♀️
Thanks also for your tips about shooting with the iPhone and gaining access to the portrait features post shooting. I would have always selected RAW. Your channel is great!
Great video, thanks. I
‘m a bit weird, but I for me my Z8+85/1.2 or 135/1.8 are the reasons to lug a heavy cam+lens around (people photography). I‘m using my phone for almost anything else. Its not so much cost, but more weight+convenience and „good enough“ (i.e. better than my DSLR 15 yrs ago). Even tempted to try the phone for studio photography (but would need to upgrade one of my strobes to be iphone-compatible).
This is why I love this channel. A comparison without snark and that keeps things in perspective. Most people that take photos with an iPhone are doing so precisely because they don’t won’t to carry around a camera and/or spend the money on a “real” camera.
Snark on this channel is reserved for products and companies the Fro don't like. If the small sensor is on an iPhone he uses, it will be less criticized than if it is on a Micro Four thirds camera.
@@ElMundoDuro exactly right. I am amazed how forgiving most UA-camr reviewers seem to be of the iphone's obvoius flaws .
haha yeah i'm a fan of the Fro snark, and i appreciate that he doesn't just have it on all the time
But yet they will buy a new $1300/$1500 phone every few years whereas a camera from 2014 can still do incredibly well.
Thanks for a cool video. For me, the most obvious difference between the two images was not in the bokeh rendition. It was the oversharpening in the iPhone pics. Where the bokeh looked good, I looked at the skin tones and the hair, and the iPhone looked a bit more like a plastic model, rather than lifelike.
This was something I was trying to determine. The oversharpening in the iPhone photo made it look like the pants and shirt had a texture on them that could absolutely be there, but evidently wasn't.
And i would like to zoom in to 100 percent hahahaha
Everything looks HDR out of iPhone
I saw you on TV when you ran on the field! Its awsome where photography has taken you.
Good comparison vide Jared.
Would love to see your review like this on the sony Xperia 1 mkv as that has controls close to their mirrorless cameras,
Great video...and cool that you caught this moment. How Angel Hernandez is still employed is miraculous 😂
I really appreciate the effort you put into explaining the differences. Helps when people ask me the differences and I have a video like this to send their way, but I can also explain some differences. I like shooting with my Sony rigs and iPhones. Both can work but there are differences. Also, more of the computational computing needs to continue toi make it back into the full frame camera.
It’s insanely good, I hear you can actually make phone calls on it as well?? 😂👌🏻👍🏻
Fro; you rock!
Hey. I upgraded to the IPhone 15 pro and love it. I am taking more photos using my phone. I enjoyed the video. Thanks for the content and hard work.
You are so professional and unbiased with your reviews unlike others no manes but I think you know who! Most of my photography gears were purchased after your reviews including Canon R6.
cheers
Jared, great video! I knew that we could rely on you to give us a "real" comparison of the iPhone 15 Pro Max in reference to pictures. I agree completely with you on the on whether the picture is as good as taken with a "real" camera, it is all about sensor size. Thanks again!
Very good review. I did not focus on the bokeh, more so on the dynamic range and that allowed for me to determine which was the iPhone or Nikon. Needless to say, the iPhone did extremely well.
This was a really great comparison/test with impressive results.
Besides this specific test case the new iPhone 15 camera(s) seems to suck really bad using heavy cropping to get pictures at the old 'normal' focal lengths.
Lightroom classic has a feature now where you can create depth maps and add blur afterwards so that’s definitely something to keep in mind when thinking about using the iPhone
Mobile has blur also.
Thanks for this assessment, lots of times I don’t want to carry my DSLR but want decent to better than decent photos and this review is helpful in assessing 15pro or 15pro Max. I’m on a 12pro and it’s only about a Eh to it’s alright level quality.
cool test. I've just ordered it (and changed to the dark side...). Looking forward what taking pictures with it will be. My wife got the 14 pro and the pictures look good.
No replacement for a real camera but more than capable for spontaneous shots (street photography).
Thanks for the test and your content!
9:25 I admit, that's an impressive comparison side by side. I did find the camera on the right, but it was only because of the smoother more continuous blurring of the field.. I tried to see in the background differences in blur or bokeh.. but nothing super visible. impressive.
11:33 I was mistaken.. I thought the busier blur in the background was the iphone, but nop.
12:04 I applied my initial assumption and got it right; the blur is much more continuous over the field with the camera.. so also more natural
But indeed, minor differences, provided as you say, that you do fill the frame
Lightroom classic v13 update means you can now adjust focus/blur (in post) using the raw instead of Apple’s Heic/heif files right?
I am mostly a portrait photographer with some events here and there, and I am amazed by this!
I can clearly tell between camera and iPhone because of the vignetting of the lens (And the Z9 has slightly nicer contrast than the iPhone!) But the fact that it's so close is amazing!
I'mma put it like this: The quality is in there, the versatility isn't. So, I could probably take my portraits with an iPhone and no one would notice (I take mostly 50mm - 85mm), but would I take the iPhone to a wedding? Never. It just doesn't have the versatility of having more zoom, using Off-Camera Flash etc.
(Of course no one in their right mind would switch their cameras for a phone but it was an example of how close this is :o)
Yeah, or for a couple hundred dollars more you could upgrade to Samsung and get a 10x better phone with a refined 10x optical zoom camera. I understand Apple people inherently are ignorant about all non-Apple technology in the world, but Samsung has been making amazing 10x optical lense/cameras in their phones for nearly half a decade. Samsung patented the whole periscope lens form factor that makes Apple's meager 5x lens even possible.
I just got anxiety at the very thought of taking an iPhone to shoot a wedding!! Lol and I almost never get anxiety.
Crazy how far we have come!
at 9:00 I wasn't sure, but my pure guess was right. you could see the vignetting from the actual glass lens, even though I wasn't sure if that was a filter or not. also interesting to see that the glass and full frame sensor did seem to be letting more light in. thanks for the side by side comparison! if I was looking for a new phone and pocket ai computer, that also had a nice camera, i'd be tempted by the iPhone 15 pro max. lots of places and people get jittery these days if you pull out a traditional camera, but they don't blink twice if you pull out a phone with a camera and microphone that are connected via satellite to ai powered cloud servers. people are funny that way
Great video! Hey Jared, love your content! I’m interested in purchasing your presets. Could you please make a instructional video on getting your presets for LR Mobile for Apple devices. (iPad pro/ iPhone pro max) Thanks. 🙏🏽
Hey! I would like to see a comparison of prints. Wont they look worlds of difference in a huge print due to the quality and size of sensors?
Thanks for the video! This is a great reminder that phone cameras have evolved a lot but still can't really compete with dedicated photography equipment. In the end, the application/need and expectations (as well as budget) should direct people to one equipment or the other.
I think Budget isn't really relevant because for the price of a 15 pro max you can get an amazing DSLR and lens that will destroy any phone and you still have some money left for a phone
@@lukassinger_photo Let's consider that's correct. How many people would opt to buy the camera instead of the phone? If you do not have capital constraints you can buy both but most people can't and many do not even care about owning a real camera.
@@lukassinger_photo The big difference is that, at least in the US, carriers will essentially finance the purchase of the phone. That makes a huge difference.
Great video!!!
I think the statement "it wouldn't be my first choice" is key. It's nice to have, especially in cases where you might not have your camera.
Wow verry good video, Listen my history, 1 year aga I buy Sony A7 IV and I dont like because to much menu and the POUNDS with different lens (I had 3 lens ouff) when you go hockey game to Big, now I have iphone 15 promax with gimbal (insta 360) and is perfect for me. I understand verry well what you said. Thanks again.
Great comparison video. The heavy vignetting on the ‘real’ camera was the biggest difference lol!
Peace be with you! Thank you for this informative companion. Is it possible to shoot photos, using the iPhone 15, in difficult lighting & rapidly moving subjects then FIXING THE PHOTOS by using an AI photo editor such as Topaz Labs Photo AI software??? Thanks again.
The video we all needed
Maybe I’ve been a photographer too long, but every time you say “you can hardly tell a difference”, I chuckle. Yes, decent snapshots, but…no.
I was also immediately able to tell, but the difference is still quite subtle, which is honestly impressive.
I'm "old," (retired) and gave away my "good" camera gear to my oldest son who is a serious hobbyist. I now have the iPhone 15 Pro Max and that is now my only camera. I like watching channels like this so I can see all of the great stuff I can do with it. I use the iPhone for more than just its camera, of course, but this is what I'm looking for when I come here.
Try new lightroom background blur that was added in the latest update
Thank you
Hi! Do iPhone collect data to make portraits after when using HEIF MAX format?
Or maybe can you shoot in portrait mode with HEIF MAX?
Awesome video
Can you export on lightroom mobile with enough quality for prints? It seems to me its locked on 70dpi and even when i only print 3x6 its pixelated (canon 80D with 100mm ef f2.8 L macro lens)
Wow I did not think they would be that close. Great comparison!
Due to sharpening it's recognizable which one is which.
For phones that capture depth data, usually when people find ways to extract the depth map, it becomes clear that the depth map is extremely low res, often around 0.5 megapixels for a 12 megpaixel image. They then rely on AI edge detection for the subject, but the end result is that the depth of field will look bad unless the background is far from the subject, and even then it will struggle with fine edge details where it is harder for the AI to figure out what is part of the subject and what is part of the background, since the depth map will not have any fine detail thus it cannot rely on depth info to help select the subject.
Someone wearing headphones can have one side blurred, other not. Plus the output will have less room for postprocessing. But you can have a fun time with the device you have with you.
please make a comparison video between Sony Xperia 1v vs professional camera Gear like this. and you should make it though.
You also see some slight barrel vignetting that you don't get with the phone camera, but I do agree, the phone camera and its software has come so far it makes it difficult to tell the difference at first glance.
well I mean yeah iPhone does add foreground blur now. Thats what makes it "more advanced" compared to other smartphones. But it won't work at that kind of distance yet. Also, I would have attached a lens. I wouldn't have used a naked phone camera if I wanted the best image possible at a baseball game. Also a tele lens attachment will add natural bokeh too. Any phone I have I would attach a lens if I wanted to get real good photos of subjects that are far away.
great video
Well, Lightroom offers lens blur now that can automatically detect depth info and you can choose what to focus like subject or point it out anywhere.
Fast apertures aren’t just for depth of field..it’s for light gathering too. So it still won’t replace fast lenses but if you’re on a budget and can’t afford more than a slow zoom and shoot during the day you can use that feature absolutely
Great job
I really think it will replace high end point and shoot cameras like the rx100, g7x and zv1 type cameras
Nice comparison. I have a Canon R5 with an array of L lenses. That said, my phone is always with me. Apple, Samsung and Pixel are all improving mobile phone photography. I find my big rig full frame often stays home these days. The new phone cameras are simply good enough in many cases.
Same boat as me.
For trips and everyday my Z Fold 4 is more than enough.
My A7 III is now 95% of the time used only for construction inspection now.
3rd party apps can allow changing iso and shutter speed?
I think Back and Foreground Blur is going to improve rapidly with all the focus AI Bokeh is getting right now.
What stands out in this comparison between phone and FF Sensor is as usual dynamic range and also that really awkward sharpening that apple keeps pushing on its photos.
Thank you for this Jared. I have more confidence in iPhone 15 Pro Max now as a camera.
What about Calls? Does the Canon have a Speaker for hands free?
these were some of the harder photos to tell apart in these kinds of comparisons. to be honest the same thing still rings true, the cutting out of the hair and the ways it computes the out of focus blue. they are way better then they have ever been which is impressive. but its still a pretty big give away.
even on one of the shots there was a little fluff on the shirt that caught a little light from the big stadium lighting and it showed up on the real camera but the phone blured it away.
again... for a phone this is the best I have seen.
for me the buttons and dials and control you get with a real camera will always win out over a phone
I had a teenager looking at some of the images I took with a real camera and they said it looked like I went too far with blurring the background of a portrait making it look fake. When I tried explaining to them that this is not fake, but the results of a shallow depth of field on a wide aperture lens, they had a hard time grasping the idea. At some point more people may prefer fake bokeh to real bokeh.
I just got my pro max today. I tried out the 5X lens. But when I select the lens. It is still using the 24mm to crop into 5X. How do I fix this?
Oversharpening and issues with white balance and some colours on stuff like foliage are the only real complaints for me with phone photos these days, for everyday moments they've gotten very good and if I didn't have some experience with real cameras I wouldn't have noticed these things
As a Pittsburgher, it’s cool to see the photos of the Pirates vs. the Phillies! Not to mention the typical Angel Hernandez debacle!!!
Great to see the comparison!
As a side-by-side comparison, I spotted the iPhone photo each time, BUT if I wasn't told so, I wouldn't have suspected it except for maybe the last 2 if I start pixel peeping.
I got all three correct as well.
4:30 you have to use other apps like focos :) and it will that work with foreground :)
I keep trying to spot you during Phillies playoffs. Thank you for all your hard work.
that’s really good. But you only compared the 12 mpx sensor, now I wonder what the 48 mpx sensor does?
This is the game I was at when I saw Jared on the field!!
9:00 I got it right!🔥
I could tell by looking at the path next to the batter.
For me there was a clear difference and it was in the colour rendition. The iPhone looked very muddy and the Nikon was very crisp and vibrant.
this shows how much the mobile camera has grown. The only thing that shows a real camera is the real camera (on this video) is the white balance, the slight over sharpened and the bokeh.
I almost got the images wrong, but changed my mind last second, when I looked at the bokeh again. The fake-bokeh from the iphone still looks a lot like gaussian blur, while the Nikon has more err ‘texture’ to.
The Google Pixel 8 Pro also has a 5x camera. Will you have a chance to evaluate it, also?
I noticed that on the iphone when it gets it right the bokeh balls are completely round , no lens distortion.
If the photos are too good they were taken on the iPhone pro max or the pixel pro
Or just grab an m100 and the EF-M55-200 or EF-S 55-250 for like $600 total and get 320/400 ff equiv in a package you are likely to be let in with.
The first comparison took me a while but I got it, the shirt and hair looked over sharpened and raised shadows on the iPhone. The pants color and bokeh was throwing me for a loop , but once I honed in on the shirt it was pretty clear. After that iPhone stuck out like a sore thumb, still pretty good but the knowing what to look for made it easy.
Also worth mentioning the iPhone Pro max is $1,600, that's not nothing and the camera is a pretty big selling point..... But.... For the form factor it's great, so YMMV I guess.
I have a pixel pro 7 and it takes a great photo. But when I look at them on bigger screens versus my pro cameras I can always see they are phone photos. On an iPad pro or monitor they don't give the same joy as a camera. That said, I am reaching for it so often, and for wide shots I'm as likely to use my phone as anything else.
Harper is such a class act out there man! Contained his frustration and instead of doing the typical dugout temper tantrum flung his helmet to the fans! The iPhones look great but they just don't handle those bright neon lights very well. I'd never reach for my iPhone over my Alpha 1 but it's nice to have handy when I'm not out shooting or with the family!
Really impressed by the iPhone considering the lack of lighting is pushing the limits of the 5x. I enjoy a bit of street photography but no longer have the time to spend on workflows and tweaking so hoping this is going to work well for me.
the borderline on top of the helmet/blue sky and pants to green made the difference obvious very fast. The results are very, very impressiv .. but maybe should compare results and ergonomics to a cam in a similar price area as the iPhone 15 ?.. i wonder when C/N/S are putting some Phone features into their bodies (SIM).. - have the game reversed - can talk to your client whilst shooting, without having to carry a heavy cumbersom device to call..
I got all the challenges correct, i can tell by how you ask the player to make his bat on his shoulder to avoid having a small gap that the phone can't process, again it's impressive stuff and if you know how to pose your model and avoid the limitations you will get really good results.