What is not so well known is that Professor Knohl has changed his mind about the transliteration, and thus the translation, of the key line 80 in the text that he had previously argued talked about resurrection of the dead after three days. The critical word that Knohl once read as a verb, “to make live” (חאיה) now is read as the noun “sign” (האות). I respect Knohl’s integrity in so freely changing his mind. This is more of a entertainment show for Christphobics than it is a documentary.
It isn't the death or tomb that tells the story..It is the Star of Bethlahem that shows the beginning and the end of the age..The star went missing for 2 thousand years..A misinterpretation of Josephus..Astromomers were searching the wrong years..The " 2007 Star of Bethleham Documentary" corrects the mistakes...How close are we ? The Dragon of Revelation 12 is in our skies as I type..
Why would it matter what the stone says if it's a forgery? Without an accurate story on where the object came from and what circumstances it was found then how can you interpret anything it says as being real? They even mention early on it was likely purchased from a shady dealer. The fakes market is huge this has to be considered as a possibility. I didn't see this line of reasoning given enough consideration. Maybe I just missed it but I didn't even see where they said the location it was found.
they are makin g up a false narrative anyway. it it's authentic it is more likely a recounting of some version of the real actual christ's resurrection etc. Which actually happened, it wasn't imaginary like some fake cult figure was. Jesus still resurrects people today, occasionally. i know, i am a witness.
Then why did it take so many centuries to find proof of Pilate, and much more such? because, the Romans records, like all others, only reported what was to their benefit - "History is written by the victors -- and in their favor".
*These words are not mine.* These are the words the Ruach HaKodesh (YAHUAH's Set-Apart Spirit) uttered through me when I prayed to YAHUAH; asking him what *he wants* me to say, knowing the truth. To they with ears: "Know that YAHUAH is the name of the Most High and YAHUsha is the name of The Son. Come out of her, my people, who have fallen to the deceit of Constantine. Who know not my name and say they love me. I have made myself known. I have heard you and I am here. There are many who are yours to be saved. I am he who knows all that you are. Come to me, here are they who are mine. Make haste to come, here are we. Give in to them who speak of me, they are yours. I am here for you. Know that all is for them, here are we. Give not to them that are against me. I am he who sees all you do. Come to me out of her, all are here for me. Do what I say. Out of her, come. All are here." Exodus 3:13-15 KJV 13 And Moses said unto God, Behold, when I come unto the children of Israel, and shall say unto them, The God of your fathers hath sent me unto you; and they shall say to me, What is his name? what shall I say unto them? 14 And God said unto Moses, I Am That I Am: and he said, Thus shalt thou say unto the children of Israel, I Am hath sent me unto you. 15 And God said moreover unto Moses, Thus shalt thou say unto the children of Israel, the Lord God of your fathers, the God of Abraham, the God of Isaac, and the God of Jacob, hath sent me unto you: this is my name for ever, and this is my memorial unto all generations. John 5:43 KJV 43 *I am come in my Father's name,* and ye receive me not: *if another shall come in his own name, him ye will receive.* 2 Corinthians 6:17 KJV 17 Wherefore come out from among them, and be ye separate, saith the Lord, and *touch not the unclean thing;* *and I will receive you.* Isaiah 52:6-7 KJV 6 Therefore my people shall know my name: therefore they shall know in that day that I am he that doth speak: behold, it is I. 7 How beautiful upon the mountains are the feet of him that bringeth good tidings, that publisheth peace; that bringeth good tidings of good, that publisheth salvation; that saith unto Zion, Thy God reigneth! 2 Corinthians 6:1-2 KJV 1 We then, as workers together with him, beseech you also that ye receive not the grace of God in vain. 2 (For he saith, I have heard thee in a time accepted, and in the day of salvation have I succoured thee: behold, now is the accepted time; behold, now is the day of salvation.) Romans 10:1-3 KJV 1 Brethren, my heart's desire and prayer to God for Israel is, that they might be saved. 2 For I bear them record that they have a zeal of God, but not according to knowledge. 3 For they being ignorant of God's righteousness, and going about to establish their own righteousness, have not submitted themselves unto the righteousness of God. Romans 10:13-17 KJV 13 For whosoever shall call upon the name of the Lord shall be saved. 14 *How then shall they call on him in whom they have not believed? and how shall they believe in him of whom they have not heard? and how shall they hear without a preacher?* 15 *And how shall they preach, except they be sent?* as it is written, *How beautiful are the feet of them that preach the gospel of peace, and bring glad tidings of good things!* 16 But they have not all obeyed the gospel. *For Esaias saith,* Lord, *who hath believed our report?* 17 *So then faith cometh by hearing, and hearing by the word of God.* Nahum 1:7 KJV 7 The Lord is good, a strong hold in the day of trouble; and *he knoweth them that trust in him.* Hebrews 3:15 KJV 15 *While it is said, To day if ye will hear his voice, harden not your hearts, as in the provocation.* Isaiah 52:11 KJV 11 *Depart ye, depart ye, go ye out from thence, touch no unclean thing;* go ye out of the midst of her; be ye clean, that bear the vessels of the Lord. John 14:15 KJV 15 *If ye love me, keep my commandments.*
The area was unstable as hell. So a lot of local records got destroyed over time. Rome probably had cliffnotes and reports of all events of worthwhile note in the empire. But probably a vast majority got destroyed as well. What we have of Roman history is the half burned tabloid paper, which everything is derived from.
In the passion narratives of the four gospels, Jesus is treated like a rebel slave, and given the ruthless torture and death that was standard in dealing with such people. No free Roman citizen or upper-class Jew would have been treated that way (except if there were very special circumstances, like having personally tried to kill the Roman emperor or King Herod). This subtext about the son of God being treated like a slave must have been obvious to people who heard or read these stories in the Roman empire, though it's become less easy to see since because we don't live in that kind of a society anymore. And it would have been much the same with the trio of rebel Messiahs in this video and how they were handled.
When you can not study the original on something this controversial and available (as in, the object is known to exist, at this time, and intact, as the claim suggests) it must be considered a fake. This video should have ended in the 1st 10 minutes.
I would love to see Simca get access to the Vatican's vault! He has an open mind, and doesn't set out to disproved the existence of Christ, (or anything else)he just goes where things take him. If anything, he convinces me even more that Jesus was an actual historical figure
If the owner refuses scholarly inspection of more than just 1 or 2-- I am suspicious. If it is before Christ's time, it could be a prophecy. I have long believed in our time we can not pinpoint the exact year of Christ's birth or death. It is just impossible to give his birth and age at his death as exact. Only that he must have "not yet been Fifty" as a Bible verse states it is a wonder to how he a man so young is so wise and respected as a wise teacher. And the Messiah was Clearly Prophecied BEFORE Christ many generations in fact in the OLD Testiment.
The exact year of Yehoshua's birth IS clearly predicted - talk to Dr. Ken Johnson (Biblefacts) about it - it's mthematicllly-arrived at from prophecy but I can't remember the exact one or more.
Typical Odyssey sophistry. 'Seems like', 'some say', 'some believe','seems to suggest', 'may have', 'possibly', etc Conjecture treated as fact then used to form conclusions. This is more entertainment than documentary.
Ink on stone..... that's 2100 old and still legible? We know that statues during Roman and Greek times had been painted in vivid colour, but only traces of the paint can be found today as time has washed and bleached it all away. I find this so hard to believe........
There is only one real son of a god, and that is Balder. Odin is the all father, Frigg was his wife, both Aesir. Together they had a son they called Balder, who is therefor a full blooded Aesir: a true son of a god. Balder was the most beautiful, wise and honest. It is said he radiated like the sun, he is sometimes called the sun, or his beauty was like the sun. He was the most beloved god in the old world.
Going by Holy Scripture the scriptures point towards Jesus (Yeshua) as the Messiah Simon was, apparently, a rebel leader thought to be a messiah but was not the “Messiah” for told in the Holy Scriptures
De lo que estoy researching .. que no Mary fue al templo para cumplir con su parte en su religion.. fue donde estaba Simón esperando para ver el bebé ..Simón el mismo hermano de Joseph .. mira pues tan guardado que lo tenían .. #tepehuantribe #tafollaleyvalainescorralaurelianosepulvedarubio
There is a LOT of mis-statements in this video. The Messiah is like a Crown Prince, designatee to the royal throne. The CHRIST is a divine being (not a human figure). Irrespective of both having connotations of being "annointed" in their word definitions - it is the Messiah who could have the royal (and priestly) holy oil poued on his head - designating his office. While the CHRIST - is a divine attribute, not a human or physical human body characteristic. There is Prince/Rabbi Jesus who was the physical Messiah, of the Maccabean lineage through his mother Princess Miramne (Mary), while the grandfather and father of Herod were Jewish converts who married jewish women, even Herod married the Maccabean Princess Miriamne, a first or second cousin to the royal-[riestly branch of Mother Mary. It is the Christ, as HA YESHUA CHRISTOS, the divine Son of God, who is said to incorporate into the physical body of Prince/Rabbi Jesus for those 3 - 3 1/2 year ministry. In this, wrongful catholic theological conflation, Son of God is also the Son of Man, also gets into and contaminates the jewish understandings of (celtic, original 30-300s CE) christianity, that all of these comments here are skewed and wrongly stated.
@@lh7550 Absolutely not - stop the heretical cathollic conflation of words ! The Christos (HA YESHUA CHRISTOS) is the cosmic divine Son of God. The Messiah (Ha Moschiach) is physical human Prince/Rabbic Jesus, the Son of Man (a prophetic title). Even the jewish people will call your statements ludicrous. LORD is given to the Christos being, while no LORD name is given to Prince/Rabbi Jesus. Puff far away smoker ....
Jesus was divinely begotten, and was the Unique Son of God. so he wasn't just inspired for 3 years, He was never a mere mortal. But always of Divine origin on His Father's side.
@@theCosmicQueen You appear to repeat the same conflation of the Prince/Rabbi Jesus and the true Divine Son Ha Yeshua Christos ("the real Jesus") who is the Son of God, that you have correct. Rabbi Jesus Ben Joseph is the Messiah ("Crown Prince") was a man - and Son of Man, a Prophet. The Divine LORD Jesus Christ is the Son of God. These 2 having the same Hebrew Yeshua, Greek Jesus name confuses and conflates most people. When you have them entirely apart and properly designated - the whole redemption, salvific message becomes absolutely clear. When both Jesus are conflated together or cross-mixed ... the Son of Man is the Son of God - and - the Son of God is the Son of Man (catholic mis-theological doctrine) everything becomes confused and so confused - as a mortal dying on a wooden stake redeems whole mankind with a Divine Entity. So you correct statement is HA YESHUA CHRISTOS was divinely begotten, and was the Unique Son of God. Prince/Rabbi Jesus was inspired for 3+ years, and was a mortal. It is the CHRISTOS who is of divine origin. The immaculate conception is false theology - because the actual Hebrew is that Mother Mary is a VIRGIN. This DOES NOT MEAN being sexually pure, innocent, and not previously sexually active. The Hebrew word VIRGIN is used in the context of being a Daughter of the Torah (Bath Mitzvah, like a male being Bar Mitzvah). To be a Hebrew VIRGIN, was to be a Torah- and Mitzvoth-obedient believer - period (!) - there is no sexual context to this. The Hebrew and jewish religion explains what these words mean - not Greek words and definitions - and especially not Roman Latin and catholicism - original sin (not a Hebrew theology), no-sex immaculate conception etc. There is no God having sex with Mother Mary - this is heresy. It unequivocable states that when Prince/Rabbi Jesus was baptized by Reb John in a baptism tank (mitzvah bath) - not in the Jordan river (!) - that the Dove came down onto Jesus and this is the "tabernacling" of the HA YESHUA CHRISTOS into Rabbi/Prince Jesus. This is blatantly said in gospel scripture that HA YESHUA CHRISTOS "tabernacled" amongst us. Two Yeshuas/Jesus. Do not conflate or cross-mix their identities.
says the one without any knowledge of the Truth. your lie can't explain how Jesus Christ has appeared to many, healed many instantly, raised many from death including in modern days, has done many miracles today, moved many minds, etc... still today . Your ignorance is very great.
@@itsmid3974 Yes. Horus, also known as Heru, Har, Her or Hor in Ancient Egyptian, is one of the most significant ancient Egyptian deities who served many functions, most notably as god of kingship, healing, protection, the sun and the sky.
Your thinking is flawed. From the fall of man, dated from the beginning of time, God declared that Jesus would come in the last days. There are many who have come before Christ who are impostures. In addition, the stone itself might be referring to Jesus and again the prophecy of His coming was dated well before His actual return and also everyone from time immemorial has know of this prophecy of messiah coming to the earth. In conclusion, the date that the stone was written does not change the fact that it is referring to the true messiah or that it is referring to another savior of the world. Because if there is another savior he must also appear in the historical records. The stone is not enough to establish that person’s existence. There even though this is an interesting fine it does not take away the fact that it is more proof to the existence of the son of God who did die and arose in 3 days.
No. A previous messiah was not the prototype for Jesus of myth. Mesopotamian myths are. They even have a deity that dies and resurrects after only three days.
Exactly. So many people forget about Greek and Sumerian mythology that influenced future folklore and mythology. All religions are harmful and false if thought of as reality.
@@dannycummings1194 obviously Is real doesn't want peace they stole the Palestinians land and run an apartheid state. They can't really believe in God and treat people the way they do
OK, I got 7 minutes into this and I had to stop. A) he is relying on writing styles which, even if they change, is no way to definitely state the date and B) he is using a replica to base his argument! Sorry, this is not archaeology or science!
It is amazing to me that there are lots of people that still believe all this supernatural crap! Interestingly, many of them supported the attempted coup of 1/6/21!
I am Christian who believes in the evidentiary stories available to us in the bible. I have seen enough archeological documentation to also believe there is more about the life of Jesus that is also to be discovered.
Is this guys whole thing trying to disprove Christianity? I’m not making a case for what’s true or not but why doesn’t he go try to find evidence that his own faith is the right one instead of these half baked tales o why another faith is not. Proper piss take
"Well, I say he is the Messiah, and I should know, I've followed a few."
Nice!
What is not so well known is that Professor Knohl has changed his mind about the transliteration, and thus the translation, of the key line 80 in the text that he had previously argued talked about resurrection of the dead after three days. The critical word that Knohl once read as a verb, “to make live” (חאיה) now is read as the noun “sign” (האות). I respect Knohl’s integrity in so freely changing his mind. This is more of a entertainment show for Christphobics than it is a documentary.
So, Gabriel was telling the Prince of Princes to sign?
It isn't the death or tomb that tells the story..It is the Star of Bethlahem that shows the beginning and the end of the age..The star went missing for 2 thousand years..A misinterpretation of Josephus..Astromomers were searching the wrong years..The " 2007 Star of Bethleham Documentary" corrects the mistakes...How close are we ? The Dragon of Revelation 12 is in our skies as I type..
Acknowledging always admirable
Sounds like excuses to pretend your religion isn't being questioned.
Why would it matter what the stone says if it's a forgery? Without an accurate story on where the object came from and what circumstances it was found then how can you interpret anything it says as being real? They even mention early on it was likely purchased from a shady dealer. The fakes market is huge this has to be considered as a possibility. I didn't see this line of reasoning given enough consideration. Maybe I just missed it but I didn't even see where they said the location it was found.
There is no talk of it being a forgery.
@@blktarockstar818 Bollocks
If it was so real then any collectors would be proud to show it or earn money from it, as it is hidden then i agree probably a fake
they are makin g up a false narrative anyway. it it's authentic it is more likely a recounting of some version of the real actual christ's resurrection etc. Which actually happened, it wasn't imaginary like some fake cult figure was. Jesus still resurrects people today, occasionally. i know, i am a witness.
@@theCosmicQueen Really? ,or are you just confused
"I say you are Lord, and I should know. I've followed a few.”
Arthur, from The Life of Brian
Actually, the resurrection isn't after 3 days, it's on the 3rd day. Day 1- the crucifixion, Day 2- Jesus lies in the tomb Day 3- the resurrection.
That was a time of many, many messiahs. The Romans kept great records.
Then why did it take so many centuries to find proof of Pilate, and much more such? because, the Romans records, like all others, only reported what was to their benefit - "History is written by the victors -- and in their favor".
*These words are not mine.* These are the words the Ruach HaKodesh (YAHUAH's Set-Apart Spirit) uttered through me when I prayed to YAHUAH; asking him what *he wants* me to say, knowing the truth. To they with ears:
"Know that YAHUAH is the name of the Most High and YAHUsha is the name of The Son.
Come out of her, my people, who have fallen to the deceit of Constantine. Who know not my name and say they love me. I have made myself known. I have heard you and I am here.
There are many who are yours to be saved. I am he who knows all that you are. Come to me, here are they who are mine. Make haste to come, here are we. Give in to them who speak of me, they are yours. I am here for you. Know that all is for them, here are we.
Give not to them that are against me. I am he who sees all you do. Come to me out of her, all are here for me. Do what I say. Out of her, come. All are here."
Exodus 3:13-15 KJV
13 And Moses said unto God, Behold, when I come unto the children of Israel, and shall say unto them, The God of your fathers hath sent me unto you; and they shall say to me, What is his name? what shall I say unto them?
14 And God said unto Moses, I Am That I Am: and he said, Thus shalt thou say unto the children of Israel, I Am hath sent me unto you.
15 And God said moreover unto Moses, Thus shalt thou say unto the children of Israel, the Lord God of your fathers, the God of Abraham, the God of Isaac, and the God of Jacob, hath sent me unto you: this is my name for ever, and this is my memorial unto all generations.
John 5:43 KJV
43 *I am come in my Father's name,* and ye receive me not: *if another shall come in his own name, him ye will receive.*
2 Corinthians 6:17 KJV
17 Wherefore come out from among them, and be ye separate, saith the Lord, and *touch not the unclean thing;* *and I will receive you.*
Isaiah 52:6-7 KJV
6 Therefore my people shall know my name: therefore they shall know in that day that I am he that doth speak: behold, it is I.
7 How beautiful upon the mountains are the feet of him that bringeth good tidings, that publisheth peace; that bringeth good tidings of good, that publisheth salvation; that saith unto Zion, Thy God reigneth!
2 Corinthians 6:1-2 KJV
1 We then, as workers together with him, beseech you also that ye receive not the grace of God in vain.
2 (For he saith, I have heard thee in a time accepted, and in the day of salvation have I succoured thee: behold, now is the accepted time; behold, now is the day of salvation.)
Romans 10:1-3 KJV
1 Brethren, my heart's desire and prayer to God for Israel is, that they might be saved.
2 For I bear them record that they have a zeal of God, but not according to knowledge.
3 For they being ignorant of God's righteousness, and going about to establish their own righteousness, have not submitted themselves unto the righteousness of God.
Romans 10:13-17 KJV
13 For whosoever shall call upon the name of the Lord shall be saved.
14 *How then shall they call on him in whom they have not believed? and how shall they believe in him of whom they have not heard? and how shall they hear without a preacher?*
15 *And how shall they preach, except they be sent?* as it is written, *How beautiful are the feet of them that preach the gospel of peace, and bring glad tidings of good things!*
16 But they have not all obeyed the gospel. *For Esaias saith,* Lord, *who hath believed our report?*
17 *So then faith cometh by hearing, and hearing by the word of God.*
Nahum 1:7 KJV
7 The Lord is good, a strong hold in the day of trouble; and *he knoweth them that trust in him.*
Hebrews 3:15 KJV
15 *While it is said, To day if ye will hear his voice, harden not your hearts, as in the provocation.*
Isaiah 52:11 KJV
11 *Depart ye, depart ye, go ye out from thence, touch no unclean thing;* go ye out of the midst of her; be ye clean, that bear the vessels of the Lord.
John 14:15 KJV
15 *If ye love me, keep my commandments.*
The area was unstable as hell. So a lot of local records got destroyed over time. Rome probably had cliffnotes and reports of all events of worthwhile note in the empire. But probably a vast majority got destroyed as well. What we have of Roman history is the half burned tabloid paper, which everything is derived from.
@@ramonasp4989
It just didn’t. You are very very wrong.
@@Mirokuofnite
Wrong. Publicly wrong, at that.
In the passion narratives of the four gospels, Jesus is treated like a rebel slave, and given the ruthless torture and death that was standard in dealing with such people. No free Roman citizen or upper-class Jew would have been treated that way (except if there were very special circumstances, like having personally tried to kill the Roman emperor or King Herod). This subtext about the son of God being treated like a slave must have been obvious to people who heard or read these stories in the Roman empire, though it's become less easy to see since because we don't live in that kind of a society anymore. And it would have been much the same with the trio of rebel Messiahs in this video and how they were handled.
When you can not study the original on something this controversial and available (as in, the object is known to exist, at this time, and intact, as the claim suggests) it must be considered a fake. This video should have ended in the 1st 10 minutes.
Also..... ink on stone that is still legible after 2100 years?
Nope..... no! Just.... no!
Not necessarily. If you went through school or even life like this, you'll most likely be dumb as hell.
There were prophets like John the Baptist but only one Messiah.
I would love to see Simca get access to the Vatican's vault!
He has an open mind, and doesn't set out to disproved the existence of Christ, (or anything else)he just goes where things take him.
If anything, he convinces me even more that Jesus was an actual historical figure
If the owner refuses scholarly inspection of more than just 1 or 2-- I am suspicious. If it is before Christ's time, it could be a prophecy. I have long believed in our time we can not pinpoint the exact year of Christ's birth or death. It is just impossible to give his birth and age at his death as exact. Only that he must have "not yet been Fifty" as a Bible verse states it is a wonder to how he a man so young is so wise and respected as a wise teacher. And the Messiah was Clearly Prophecied BEFORE Christ many generations in fact in the OLD Testiment.
The exact year of Yehoshua's birth IS clearly predicted - talk to Dr. Ken Johnson (Biblefacts) about it - it's mthematicllly-arrived at from prophecy but I can't remember the exact one or more.
It's because Jesus wasn't an actual person but an amalgamation of multiple messianic figures
@@blktarockstar818Agreed
Typical Odyssey sophistry.
'Seems like', 'some say', 'some believe','seems to suggest', 'may have', 'possibly', etc
Conjecture treated as fact then used to form conclusions.
This is more entertainment than documentary.
As religion/ mythology is suppose to be seen.
@@dannycummings1194 Religion and mythology maybe but Christ / God have empirical evidence of truth. Confusing the two hurts mankind.
it's more insulting blasphemy than entertainment.
Seems more like a prophetic revelation to me.
The whole thing falls like a house of cards if you consider that the scribe could have had an old fashioned style of writing.
This guy has made a career out of mocking Christianity
Christians make a mockery of Christianity
It invites mockery.... it is the stupidest story in the history of all unlikely stories.
@@JacquesMare go to hell. Jesus did documented eyewitnessed miracles, still does them today, and sometimes raises the dead. has appeared to many.
And Christians re wrote a JEWISH book....about a jewish man....are you a broken record or a remix man.....your so slow
On Ancient and Medieval religion I hotly recommend Schwerpunkt's video series
There is only one Messiah, Jesus Christ .❤ only one man who changed the history of the world…Jesus
Ink on stone..... that's 2100 old and still legible?
We know that statues during Roman and Greek times had been painted in vivid colour, but only traces of the paint can be found today as time has washed and bleached it all away.
I find this so hard to believe........
But you belive in the ancient paintings and Egypts
I find your ignorance hard to believe
There is only one real son of a god, and that is Balder.
Odin is the all father, Frigg was his wife, both Aesir. Together they had a son they called Balder, who is therefor a full blooded Aesir: a true son of a god.
Balder was the most beautiful, wise and honest. It is said he radiated like the sun, he is sometimes called the sun, or his beauty was like the sun. He was the most beloved god in the old world.
Going by Holy Scripture the scriptures point towards Jesus (Yeshua) as the Messiah
Simon was, apparently, a rebel leader thought to be a messiah but was not the “Messiah” for told in the Holy Scriptures
I was interested until he was asking to have a replica made... He's too gimmicky, not serious archaeology.
John the Baptist was not influenced by Simon
As soon as I saw at the beginning who is doing the “documentary” I rolled my eyes. Clown show.
Certainly handy it's written on stone, so can't be dated.
yes and the writing is different from those dated ones they compared. it could have been easily copied from the Dead Sea Scrolls style.
Jesus (Yeshua) was not influenced by Simon
De lo que estoy researching .. que no Mary fue al templo para cumplir con su parte en su religion.. fue donde estaba Simón esperando para ver el bebé ..Simón el mismo hermano de Joseph .. mira pues tan guardado que lo tenían .. #tepehuantribe #tafollaleyvalainescorralaurelianosepulvedarubio
Santa Claus ! 🎅🏼
Its all based on astral worship, all the stories have been changed over the years over and over...
Someone watched Zeitgeist
Oh. Yay. More unnecessary background music adding absolutely zero value to the show. 😑
Holy heck, these "evidence" seem to be nothing more than flimsy guesswork. Come on
Your video is so great!
There is a LOT of mis-statements in this video. The Messiah is like a Crown Prince, designatee to the royal throne. The CHRIST is a divine being (not a human figure). Irrespective of both having connotations of being "annointed" in their word definitions - it is the Messiah who could have the royal (and priestly) holy oil poued on his head - designating his office. While the CHRIST - is a divine attribute, not a human or physical human body characteristic. There is Prince/Rabbi Jesus who was the physical Messiah, of the Maccabean lineage through his mother Princess Miramne (Mary), while the grandfather and father of Herod were Jewish converts who married jewish women, even Herod married the Maccabean Princess Miriamne, a first or second cousin to the royal-[riestly branch of Mother Mary. It is the Christ, as HA YESHUA CHRISTOS, the divine Son of God, who is said to incorporate into the physical body of Prince/Rabbi Jesus for those 3 - 3 1/2 year ministry. In this, wrongful catholic theological conflation, Son of God is also the Son of Man, also gets into and contaminates the jewish understandings of (celtic, original 30-300s CE) christianity, that all of these comments here are skewed and wrongly stated.
The Christ = The Messiah.... Just in a different language: Greek and Hebraic languages.
@@lh7550 Absolutely not - stop the heretical cathollic conflation of words ! The Christos (HA YESHUA CHRISTOS) is the cosmic divine Son of God. The Messiah (Ha Moschiach) is physical human Prince/Rabbic Jesus, the Son of Man (a prophetic title). Even the jewish people will call your statements ludicrous. LORD is given to the Christos being, while no LORD name is given to Prince/Rabbi Jesus. Puff far away smoker ....
Jesus was divinely begotten, and was the Unique Son of God. so he wasn't just inspired for 3 years, He was never a mere mortal. But always of Divine origin on His Father's side.
@@theCosmicQueen You appear to repeat the same conflation of the Prince/Rabbi Jesus and the true Divine Son Ha Yeshua Christos ("the real Jesus") who is the Son of God, that you have correct. Rabbi Jesus Ben Joseph is the Messiah ("Crown Prince") was a man - and Son of Man, a Prophet. The Divine LORD Jesus Christ is the Son of God. These 2 having the same Hebrew Yeshua, Greek Jesus name confuses and conflates most people. When you have them entirely apart and properly designated - the whole redemption, salvific message becomes absolutely clear. When both Jesus are conflated together or cross-mixed ... the Son of Man is the Son of God - and - the Son of God is the Son of Man (catholic mis-theological doctrine) everything becomes confused and so confused - as a mortal dying on a wooden stake redeems whole mankind with a Divine Entity.
So you correct statement is HA YESHUA CHRISTOS was divinely begotten, and was the Unique Son of God. Prince/Rabbi Jesus was inspired for 3+ years, and was a mortal. It is the CHRISTOS who is of divine origin.
The immaculate conception is false theology - because the actual Hebrew is that Mother Mary is a VIRGIN. This DOES NOT MEAN being sexually pure, innocent, and not previously sexually active. The Hebrew word VIRGIN is used in the context of being a Daughter of the Torah (Bath Mitzvah, like a male being Bar Mitzvah). To be a Hebrew VIRGIN, was to be a Torah- and Mitzvoth-obedient believer - period (!) - there is no sexual context to this. The Hebrew and jewish religion explains what these words mean - not Greek words and definitions - and especially not Roman Latin and catholicism - original sin (not a Hebrew theology), no-sex immaculate conception etc. There is no God having sex with Mother Mary - this is heresy. It unequivocable states that when Prince/Rabbi Jesus was baptized by Reb John in a baptism tank (mitzvah bath) - not in the Jordan river (!) - that the Dove came down onto Jesus and this is the "tabernacling" of the HA YESHUA CHRISTOS into Rabbi/Prince Jesus. This is blatantly said in gospel scripture that HA YESHUA CHRISTOS "tabernacled" amongst us.
Two Yeshuas/Jesus. Do not conflate or cross-mix their identities.
Religion and fraud are blood brothers
there were hundreds of messianic jewish cults
PROPHECY
There relic is a fake, that's why the owner of it will not let anybody examine it😮
Jesus myth is almost entirely lifted from Horus, the Egyptian God of the sun.
Interesting
says the one without any knowledge of the Truth. your lie can't explain how Jesus Christ has appeared to many, healed many instantly, raised many from death including in modern days, has done many miracles today, moved many minds, etc... still today . Your ignorance is very great.
What about the life of those who put their lives (The apostleto for examplle) for what they witnessed and believe.
Horus was no Egyptian god of the sun. He was the god of the sky (sun and moon yea, but not the sun specifically). Ra was
@@itsmid3974 Yes. Horus, also known as Heru, Har, Her or Hor in Ancient Egyptian, is one of the most significant ancient Egyptian deities who served many functions, most notably as god of kingship, healing, protection, the sun and the sky.
The lost Messiah...Yabadabadoo...😁
Your thinking is flawed. From the fall of man, dated from the beginning of time, God declared that Jesus would come in the last days. There are many who have come before Christ who are impostures. In addition, the stone itself might be referring to Jesus and again the prophecy of His coming was dated well before His actual return and also everyone from time immemorial has know of this prophecy of messiah coming to the earth. In conclusion, the date that the stone was written does not change the fact that it is referring to the true messiah or that it is referring to another savior of the world. Because if there is another savior he must also appear in the historical records. The stone is not enough to establish that person’s existence. There even though this is an interesting fine it does not take away the fact that it is more proof to the existence of the son of God who did die and arose in 3 days.
Tablets of thoth
No. A previous messiah was not the prototype for Jesus of myth. Mesopotamian myths are. They even have a deity that dies and resurrects after only three days.
Exactly. So many people forget about Greek and Sumerian mythology that influenced future folklore and mythology. All religions are harmful and false if thought of as reality.
How many more times are ye gonna post this video.
Are you sure he wasn't the messiah? And not just a naughty boy?
God is all that exists so we are all seeds of God,for me Jesus was no more the son of God than I am.
Then you aren't a Christian
Exactly my friend. Jesus was a man. A very awakened man, but a man nonetheless. We are all sparks of the divine and Jesus knew this
"God" always gives more than one chance!
WOW""" SOO THIS WAS A PRACTICE ???
Legion is 5, NOT 10 thsd. So, 3 legions equals 15 thsd, NOT 30.
In general - they don't know, what they are doing (regarding the future)
When is the Messiah gonna come that will bring peace between Israel and Palestine?
As soon as the Jews stop running an apartheid regime
Nope. Never going to happen.
@@dannycummings1194 obviously Is real doesn't want peace they stole the Palestinians land and run an apartheid state. They can't really believe in God and treat people the way they do
Jesus isn't done refining them yet ( culling).
This video is just hilarious.
OK, I got 7 minutes into this and I had to stop. A) he is relying on writing styles which, even if they change, is no way to definitely state the date and B) he is using a replica to base his argument! Sorry, this is not archaeology or science!
Jesus is The Messiah!! There is NO other... ✝️✝️
Nope. I don't need a dead master or a Jewish zombie telling me semi-moral dos and don'ts.
More fake Jesus images
Yup, he's definitely not white.
He was simon barkobah (❓) - not original savior, Big liar❗Gby. Haleluya.
Whitewash
Boohoo
No it doesn't. Only one Messiah. Jesus Christ.
DISTORTED BIBLE
It is amazing to me that there are lots of people that still believe all this supernatural crap! Interestingly, many of them supported the attempted coup of 1/6/21!
Exactly
I am Christian who believes in the evidentiary stories available to us in the bible. I have seen enough archeological documentation to also believe there is more about the life of Jesus that is also to be discovered.
There isn't g
There isn't good evidence that Jesus was a real person. The most likely scenario is that Jesus is an amalgamation of multiple messianic figures
@@blktarockstar818 "good" is a subjective term. You decide for yourself what you believe and I shall do the same.
@basedgamerguy818 Exactly. Just like King Arthur.
@patriciafleming8402 not when it comes to proof.
Small hat propaganda, this one.
Jesus is the one and only Messiah and anything else is a lie from the devil,he loves to put doubt in man's mind so they will question the truth.
All messiahs are lost... In the Head😅
Is this guys whole thing trying to disprove Christianity? I’m not making a case for what’s true or not but why doesn’t he go try to find evidence that his own faith is the right one instead of these half baked tales o why another faith is not. Proper piss take
not real
I just want to say one thing...i dont like this guy whoever he is
Yeah. And unlike Jesus, this One was White. Not Black.
The true masahia the true Jesus is not for Jews but only for Muslims and Christians none of the others
All 3 religions believe in the same God and all 3 are equally wrong
Yeshua is Mashiach!