How Many Chiral Centers are in this molecule?

Поділитися
Вставка
  • Опубліковано 4 січ 2025

КОМЕНТАРІ • 172

  • @rockyp8869
    @rockyp8869 2 роки тому +23

    To the people who are confused, the 2 nitrogens are NOT chiral centres, in both of the nitrogens the lone paors are delocalised, so they are NOT sp3, but effectively sp2 hybridised ,which is why they are not chiral centres, and the ans should DEFINITELY be 2 chiral centres

  • @ProfessorMike
    @ProfessorMike 10 років тому +189

    I appreciate the effort to help others on UA-cam with this material. The world needs more people like you.
    However, I feel I have the Onus to help clarify for other viewers
    That Nitrogen is sp2 hybridized, the lone pair of electron are in a unhybridized p-orbital; it would not be considered a chiral center.
    There are only 2 chiral centers, and 4 total stereoisomers possible for the molecule you have drawn.
    If people left this video thinking that the Nitrogen with the long pairs was a chiral center: They are going to do very poorly in O-Chem.

    • @ghtutorials5695
      @ghtutorials5695 9 років тому +2

      +ProfessorMike Correct, for anyone wanting to read more on this. See here: www.chem.ucla.edu/harding/tutorials/nitrogen_inversion.pdf

    • @walleandeve1
      @walleandeve1 6 років тому +3

      I know you put this awhile ago but I appreciate the comment. I was watching this video and pausing to test my ability to identify stereocentres, and I could only find the two as well. I've been going by the idea that a nitrogen can only act as a centre if it's in a ring.

    • @jamesandonian7829
      @jamesandonian7829 5 років тому +1

      I'm 4 years late but yes!!!! Very good!!!!!!!!

    • @satyayadav4111
      @satyayadav4111 5 років тому +2

      I think having chiral centers and being chiral (optically actice) are two different things.
      A compound can have chiral centre but still can be achiral (optically inactive). Here Nitrogen is a chiral center but not optically active due to nitrogen or pyramidal inversion.

    • @knightawz
      @knightawz 5 років тому

      so is n never a chiral centre?

  • @SahilSharma-qn9jn
    @SahilSharma-qn9jn 3 роки тому +26

    I think Nitrogen Is not considered here as a chiral center, as Its lone pair is delocalised due to resonance. This question came in JEE (Main) 2020.

    • @horridartistry
      @horridartistry 2 роки тому +1

      Thanks bro I was searching for that question only 😅.

  • @esmfamil5086
    @esmfamil5086 4 роки тому +3

    I appreciate that you also considered O to be a possibility. I have watched 10 videos so far and none addressed that.

  • @yinjia7045
    @yinjia7045 4 роки тому +20

    i guess some of us mistaken chiral 'centers' as chiral 'carbon' ?
    I'm new to biochemistry, thanks for explaining, your video is very helpful :))

    • @Utpal-fj4hk
      @Utpal-fj4hk 3 роки тому

      Yeah
      Same here
      I also assumed chiral carbon instead of chiral center

    • @PawsWhiskers-Clips
      @PawsWhiskers-Clips 3 роки тому

      Yeah, and also i thought that electronepairs dont count as a , like he calls it different thing

  • @TheLule93
    @TheLule93 10 років тому +8

    I thought the N would not participate in the evaluation because it is connected to a sp2 hybridized carbon atom...idk, I am currently practicing with a very similar molecule and the correct answer on it does not include the nitrogen. Im confused

  • @peter7147
    @peter7147 3 роки тому +3

    there is ONLY 2 chiral centers, the N does not count as chiral center. the chiral centers are considered those 4 different groups attached ONLY to Carbon

  • @auroralatea2953
    @auroralatea2953 3 роки тому +2

    This video was awesome!!!!!! I wasn’t struggling with finding the chiral centers; I was struggling with determining what they were attached to. You broke it down beautifully and I understand now. Thank you!

  • @jeeva1996
    @jeeva1996 9 років тому +19

    i though it was 4 different groups around a C atom, so why are you counting the Nitrogen part

    • @satyamtripathi7736
      @satyamtripathi7736 5 років тому +1

      Same question !!

    • @gissellem1341
      @gissellem1341 5 років тому +3

      A Chiral center does not have to be to be attached to a carbon, so he is correct.

    • @gissellem1341
      @gissellem1341 5 років тому +1

      @@satyamtripathi7736 a chiral center does not have to be attached to a carbon atom, he is correct.

  • @dannychenski687
    @dannychenski687 Місяць тому

    "If it's a double bond, it can't be a chiral center"
    THX!!!!

  • @bravotasker5883
    @bravotasker5883 3 роки тому +1

    But The 2 Nitrogens Are In Conjugation.. So They Are Planar Right?..So They Cant Be Considered As Chiral Centre, Right?

  • @inferninx
    @inferninx 7 років тому +1

    My Orgo professor taught us heteroatoms can be chiral. Nitrogen can be chiral and change its hybridization. It's just confusing so most curriculums don't teach it. On my last exam I DIDNT indicate nitrogen chirality and lost points lol.

  • @rachelo9oooyohannes254
    @rachelo9oooyohannes254 3 роки тому +1

    Thank you so much for this video, getting ready for Chem lecture in 45 min and you just saved my brain! Really appreciate it!🙌🏽

  • @AchkeineAhnung24
    @AchkeineAhnung24 7 років тому

    looking for a video like this about half an hour now. thx man

  • @인생은도전이지
    @인생은도전이지 3 роки тому +1

    Nitrogen is not chiral center because Nitrogon inversion occurs!

    • @Strxwberrey
      @Strxwberrey 3 роки тому

      Exactly my professor said the same thing

  • @linaabdelshafy6524
    @linaabdelshafy6524 3 роки тому

    The best teacher ever

  • @humbertoochoa1777
    @humbertoochoa1777 10 років тому +8

    Due to resonance the nitrogen is an sp2 trigonal planar and not a tetrahedral. Therefore, not a chiral center

    • @chemusharma5682
      @chemusharma5682 10 років тому

      but here it deals with the unusualness of the functional groups

    • @xlionheart92x
      @xlionheart92x 7 років тому

      the nitrogens in his compound are sp3

  • @theamazingguy150
    @theamazingguy150 4 роки тому +1

    My chemistry teacher said to not count the nitrogen, unless it's a quaternary amine with 4 other groups. I am very confused.

    • @rushikeshreddy8044
      @rushikeshreddy8044 3 роки тому +1

      That is because nitrogen with a lone pair shows a phenomenon called pyramidal inversion or umbrella effect. Due to this , the nitrogen though sp³ with four different groups is not considered if one of them is a lone pair

    • @theamazingguy150
      @theamazingguy150 3 роки тому

      @@rushikeshreddy8044 thank you for the explanation

  • @TheLule93
    @TheLule93 10 років тому +5

    I mean to say the Nitrogen that is connected to the Hydrogen

  • @Adam9848
    @Adam9848 7 років тому +2

    very nice voice. thank you from Nigeria

  • @josemariecordova5012
    @josemariecordova5012 4 роки тому

    I LOVE THE EXCITEMENT IN YOUR VOICE WHILE LOOKING FOR THE CHIRAL CENTERS. 12 OF 10!

  • @anteater2536
    @anteater2536 9 років тому +4

    thank you sir, your videos have helped me a lot.

  • @sharmapawan5578
    @sharmapawan5578 5 років тому +1

    Very nice explained

  • @boyisun
    @boyisun 8 років тому +1

    Can you tell whether it is R or S for those chiral atoms apart from the top-right carbon in the square just by looking at this structure diagram?

  • @epicamr96
    @epicamr96 8 років тому +4

    nitrogen can't be chiral
    they are called groups not things
    this is not penicillin V
    the "square thing" is called beta-lactam ring

  • @shoumobanerjee8541
    @shoumobanerjee8541 3 роки тому +2

    It was very helpful thank you so much. The textbook explains this in terms of mirror images that is no not intuitive

  • @arjunverma963
    @arjunverma963 3 роки тому

    doesn't the nitrogen thing show some kind of inversion or is not relevant to chiral center

  • @prethishrahul3506
    @prethishrahul3506 2 роки тому

    It is 5 excluding NH. Because of Umbrella Inversion, NH loses it's chirality whereas, Cyclic N posses chirality.

  • @RemiTa1st
    @RemiTa1st 7 років тому

    this is penicillin V structure missing the COOH

  • @maybilianna7791
    @maybilianna7791 8 років тому +43

    apparently, nitrogen is not chiral since I've got my test back and got the question wrong =(

    • @hamrocksco1
      @hamrocksco1 8 років тому +5

      maybi lianna it's correct your teacher is just dumb

    • @adarshchaturvedi3498
      @adarshchaturvedi3498 8 років тому +7

      Yes bcuse nitrogen lone pair is delocalised

    • @xlionheart92x
      @xlionheart92x 7 років тому +15

      only carbon can be chiral

    • @yz416
      @yz416 6 років тому +4

      its just a prank bro

    • @brandonwatson883
      @brandonwatson883 3 роки тому +1

      This is late. That nitrogen is chiral, but due to pyramidal inversion, if you could isolate one enantiomer, it would racemize. Cannot typically be isolated. So most people ignore chiral nitrogens

  • @andrewcobb3919
    @andrewcobb3919 3 роки тому

    Makes so much more sense now, after listening to multiple people explain it and watching a few videos, this makes it clear.

  • @artolapvetelainen3703
    @artolapvetelainen3703 2 роки тому

    I think this is wrong. I thought that chiral centers are atoms that are connected at least four different atoms or atom groups? Also when google this Penicillin, there are not any other example, where nitrogen is chiral...

  • @kalasrinivasan8639
    @kalasrinivasan8639 7 років тому

    video was really helpful
    , PS; nitrogen group not chiral

  • @aspektn.5066
    @aspektn.5066 5 років тому

    Seen once. Shall be seen again. Great vid.

  • @KA11LMA
    @KA11LMA 4 роки тому

    So does this mean when searching for chiral centres we can dismiss all double bonds?

    • @tobinos8018
      @tobinos8018 4 роки тому +1

      Yes because with a double bond,the carbon would have 3 groups around it not 4

  • @fakingtrels
    @fakingtrels 8 років тому

    But what about quantum tunneling in the nitrogen doesn't that prevent it from inverting therefore stop it from being chiral?

  • @k.anusha2307
    @k.anusha2307 4 роки тому

    Awesome! Really helped me a lot to revise chiral centre concept......!!! Thank you bro..

  • @BCS_RavigowriJaswanth
    @BCS_RavigowriJaswanth 4 роки тому

    How can we find the no of sterio isomers in same structure

  • @prodyutbanerjee766
    @prodyutbanerjee766 8 років тому

    can u explain how many optically active product can be obtained due to the monochlorination of Methyl cyclohexane.

  • @veerammatogare6099
    @veerammatogare6099 2 роки тому

    Really good explanation..
    Thank you

  • @easy461
    @easy461 Рік тому

    I disagree
    The nitrogen in form of amide which is not basic
    The lone pair electrons are delocalized away from nitrogen by reasonance
    So the two N atoms are non chiral at all
    There's 3 chairal centers of 3 carbon atoms only
    And you misaked by forgetting to add carboxylic group on the beta lactam ring which is essential for activity

  • @94cd5
    @94cd5 6 років тому +1

    Thanks for the helpful video.

  • @sachinsharma8823
    @sachinsharma8823 6 років тому

    wrong, both nitrogens are not a chiral centre because there will be resonance between nitrogen and c=o which is atteched at the adjusent position.

  • @bhavyagumber3198
    @bhavyagumber3198 4 роки тому +1

    Thanks a lot ...
    Love from India💞💞

  • @LeftenantBeige
    @LeftenantBeige 2 роки тому

    I thought Chiral Centers related to Carbons only? My textbook definition: A "carbon" atom surrounded by four different groups ????

  • @mustafaz7385
    @mustafaz7385 10 років тому +1

    Thank you for your hard working

  • @sorianasor9730
    @sorianasor9730 5 років тому

    How many diastereomers can be in this molecule ?

  • @debarshiroy4596
    @debarshiroy4596 3 роки тому

    Can we also call it a stereogenic center?

  • @shaboatrad4066
    @shaboatrad4066 8 років тому

    What if it has A double bond with oXygen and a bond with H and A bond with C

  • @ravichem8693
    @ravichem8693 9 років тому +6

    appreciate your work to help others.... but your answer is wrong..... this molecule given by you has only 2 chiral centers......... 4 stereoisomers...... N atom of two amide groups are sp2 hybridized as C=N bond has partial double bond character ....... therefore N atoms are not chiral........ this molecule look like penicillin but lacks COOH group..... if you get it you will find 3 chiral centers........

  • @AwesomenessBigRock
    @AwesomenessBigRock 7 років тому +2

    Thanks man, that helped me in Pharmacolgy

  • @rubinetienne4477
    @rubinetienne4477 10 років тому

    Nate your the man.

  • @danieljohnsopardenilla997
    @danieljohnsopardenilla997 4 роки тому +1

    How do you know that the Nitrogen has 2 lone pairs instead of 2 hydrogen bonds?

  • @fahadahamed1781
    @fahadahamed1781 3 роки тому

    How many chiral centre have atropine

  • @himneelborse2509
    @himneelborse2509 4 роки тому

    excellent explaination sir

  • @anshulraturi6655
    @anshulraturi6655 3 роки тому +1

    N ni hoga chiral vo resonance mai hai

  • @AndrewShehata3
    @AndrewShehata3 9 років тому +36

    The nitrogen is not chiral!

    • @AznJJLinCpopstar
      @AznJJLinCpopstar 7 років тому +1

      It is Chiral because there are 4 different bonds coming off of it.

    • @drewskeez1156
      @drewskeez1156 7 років тому +8

      Neutral nitrogens with three substituents are not chiral. Positively charged nitrogens with three subsituents are chiral. Anyways, it does not have 4 bonds with anything. It has three with a lone pair.

    • @pcchemistry6745
      @pcchemistry6745 5 років тому

      but nitrogen have bulky group that's it's will not inverse in umbrella form, so it is chiral

  • @miaeba
    @miaeba 7 років тому

    the answer guide in my text says this is incorrect.

  • @amethystwings7337
    @amethystwings7337 9 років тому +3

    This video has helped me a lot..thank you! :)

  • @zairaholali3889
    @zairaholali3889 2 роки тому

    Thank you for this video, but I don't think Nitrogen is a chiral center.

  • @فَطۅشہ-ت6غ
    @فَطۅشہ-ت6غ 4 роки тому +2

    Thank you so much 🌺❤

  • @nesrinezallema2664
    @nesrinezallema2664 4 роки тому

    Thank you very much for your explanation

  • @satyamkumarmehta4111
    @satyamkumarmehta4111 2 роки тому +1

    Thanks to you sir🙏

  • @nitapatil5121
    @nitapatil5121 4 роки тому +1

    The vidio is of 2015 but this help me on 2020

  • @xiaozhufang520
    @xiaozhufang520 Рік тому

    Yes, it helped me lot. Thank you!

  • @구름너머
    @구름너머 5 років тому +1

    Thanks. Very helpful.

  • @abdul-alimmuhammadisah6862
    @abdul-alimmuhammadisah6862 9 років тому +1

    Thanks alot this video has helped alot

  • @zonko
    @zonko 6 років тому

    4 different things
    4 different Death Stranding trailers

  • @ahmddmg3076
    @ahmddmg3076 4 роки тому

    Very very good thanks for this Video

  • @ابتهالسنبل
    @ابتهالسنبل 9 років тому +1

    Thanks a lot.... Really It's so helpful video 📹

  • @garysuarez2107
    @garysuarez2107 3 роки тому

    Still valuable knowledge

  • @Muhammad44932
    @Muhammad44932 6 років тому +1

    So informative

  • @AryanKumar-wz4gi
    @AryanKumar-wz4gi 3 роки тому +2

    This came in my exam

  • @suzyleonhanna8866
    @suzyleonhanna8866 8 років тому +16

    chirality is a character related to only carbon not any other atom

    • @organistitigullio3866
      @organistitigullio3866 8 років тому +16

      +suzy leon hanna No. Any tetrahedral atom that has bonds with four different atoms can be a chiral centre. Usually it is a carbon.

    • @sachinsharma8823
      @sachinsharma8823 6 років тому

      wrong,there will be any atom chiral centre provided it should be atteched with four different things

    • @meetbrahmbhatt1531
      @meetbrahmbhatt1531 5 років тому

      Not necessarily

  • @sk921
    @sk921 3 роки тому

    Thank you so much sir. It was very helpful.

  • @ashnamaheen6573
    @ashnamaheen6573 5 років тому +1

    Thank u so much. It was really helpful :)

  • @BlackFiredDragon
    @BlackFiredDragon 9 років тому +4

    You sound kinda like Tom Cruise...

  • @AyushDwivedi-ri4kw
    @AyushDwivedi-ri4kw 5 років тому +2

    THAAAANKYOUUUUU 💖💖💖

  • @SuperSimpleasthat
    @SuperSimpleasthat 7 років тому

    A lone pair of hydrogen and a hydrogen is the same thing so Nitrogen is not chiral

  • @syahira7786
    @syahira7786 7 років тому

    GUYS...NITROGEN CANNOT BE CHIRAL CENTER...ONLY CARBON... CHIRAL CENTRE IS DEFINED AS SP3 HYBRIDISED CARBON ATOM👈 (only carbon) WITH FOUR DIFFERENT ATOMS OR GROUPS BONDED TO IT....

    • @pawanprakash4131
      @pawanprakash4131 6 років тому

      In Ammonium ion Nitrogen is chiral... It can be Chiral but in this case there is quantum tunnelling of lone pair changing the hybridization or through the inversion and due to this a racemic mixture is formed and the resultant molecule becomes inactive so the nitrogen can't be considered as the stereocentre... but in some cases it can be chiral...

  • @boyisun
    @boyisun 8 років тому +1

    Could anyone name this molecule pleeeeeeeeeeeeease?

  • @monicanobbay3710
    @monicanobbay3710 7 років тому

    i love you Nate, you've helped me understand chirality!!!!!!! THANK YOU SO MUCH

  • @vidyarthv9735
    @vidyarthv9735 6 років тому

    Tat nitrogen attached to hydrogen is not chiral cuz nitrogen undergoes rapid inversion!

  • @shaboatrad4066
    @shaboatrad4066 8 років тому

    Isn't it asymmetrical

  • @LaHayeSaint
    @LaHayeSaint 4 роки тому +3

    This has got to be one of the worst scientifically inept videos ever! Firstly, the intended Penicillin V structure is incorrect as it lacks a carboxylic acid group at chiral centre C2 on the bicyclic 4-thia-1-azabicyclo[3.2.0]heptane ring. Secondly, a lone pair on an amide nitrogen does not count as a substituent when determining if a centre is chiral. Ring C5 and C5 carbons are chiral, as they are each attached to 4 different groups. That's 3 chiral centres. The ring atoms should have been numbered. Note also, the correct spelling of the word "centre."

  • @nanamimomozono1113
    @nanamimomozono1113 6 років тому

    Thank you so much for helping...

  • @HMADY
    @HMADY 10 років тому +1

    now it is esay . thank you

  • @lujainawwad1526
    @lujainawwad1526 6 років тому +1

    Thank you so much!!

  • @priyamkeshwa6047
    @priyamkeshwa6047 6 років тому

    thanks it helped a lot

  • @translucency
    @translucency 9 років тому

    these captions are hilariously bad, but great video nonetheless.

  • @aongocnganha2246
    @aongocnganha2246 3 роки тому

    Thank you 😘😘😘😘. Helped a lot :>>

  • @dharmeepatel7385
    @dharmeepatel7385 3 роки тому

    Thanks a lot man!

  • @RandomGirlDiana
    @RandomGirlDiana 6 років тому

    you saved my ass thank you

  • @emirafatimah
    @emirafatimah 7 років тому +1

    thank you ❤️

  • @Ishaalsariff14
    @Ishaalsariff14 4 роки тому

    Smart way!

  • @princesilvestinrajneolashe9664
    @princesilvestinrajneolashe9664 4 роки тому

    Thank you sir😊

  • @geofreynderitu9137
    @geofreynderitu9137 7 років тому

    hapo sawa a very good lesson

  • @danemarielledawat8905
    @danemarielledawat8905 4 роки тому +1

    thank you :>

  • @harshita.835
    @harshita.835 2 роки тому

    Love from India🇮🇳🇮🇳🇮🇳

  • @oritsuyosai1370
    @oritsuyosai1370 5 років тому

    Thank you