Up From The Depths Reviews | Mighty Joe Young (1949)

Поділитися
Вставка
  • Опубліковано 6 вер 2024
  • An eccentric entrepreneur brings a young woman and her pet gorilla back from Africa to be the starring act in his nightclub.
    Purchase this film on Amazon: amzn.to/3xGPpPG
    Released: July 27, 1949
    Producer: Merian C. Cooper
    Director: Ernest B. Schoedsack
    Screenplay: Ruth Rose, story by Merian C. Cooper
    Music: Roy Webb
    Special Effects: Willis O'Brien, Ray Harryhausen, Pete Peterson, and Marcel Delgado
    Starring:
    Terry Moore as Jill Young
    Ben Johnson as Gregg
    Robert Armstrong as Max O'Hara
    Frank McHugh as Windy
    Douglas Fowley as Jones
    Denis Green as Crawford
    Paul Guilfoyle as Smith
    Nestor Paiva as Brown
    Regis Toomey as John Young
    Lora Lee Michel as Jill Young, as a girl
    James Flavin as Schultz
    Primo Carnera appears as himself
    Maurice Tillet as The Swedish Angel
    #MightyJoeYoung
    ---------
    Up From The Depths is dedicated to diving deep into all things Godzilla and kaiju. Subscribe: goo.gl/ZzG77P
    Twitter: / fromthedepths88
    Fair Use Copyright Disclaimer: Copyright Disclaimer Under Section 107 of the Copyright Act 1976, allowance is made for "fair use" for purposes such as criticism, comment, news reporting, teaching, scholarship, and research. Fair use is a use permitted by copyright statute that might otherwise be infringing. Non-profit, educational or personal use tips the balance in favor of fair use.

КОМЕНТАРІ • 141

  • @brandonb1681
    @brandonb1681 3 роки тому +71

    The stop motion is top notch. Not too hard to suspend disbelief.

  • @Neillan
    @Neillan 3 роки тому +54

    I didn't realize this franchise was this old. I only saw the 1998 Disney version, had no idea this even existed!

    • @mandalorianhunter1
      @mandalorianhunter1 3 роки тому +6

      I remember watching that when I was younger.

    • @kme321
      @kme321 Рік тому +3

      Me too, I was caught off guard.

  • @SaurianStudios1207
    @SaurianStudios1207 3 роки тому +98

    I know that this movie isn't a sequel to king kong 1933 or son of kong but it still feels like it's part of the same universe and it was made by the same creative team as kong. So kong kinda has his own trilogy if you think about it.

    • @forestfilms472
      @forestfilms472 3 роки тому +10

      Mighty Joe Young in the monsterverse asap.

    • @the_pentah00k58
      @the_pentah00k58 3 роки тому +6

      @@forestfilms472 Titanus Joe

    • @Xagzan
      @Xagzan 3 роки тому +2

      Hell there was a DVD box set with all 3, which I have.

    • @TheHorns1996
      @TheHorns1996 3 роки тому +3

      @@the_pentah00k58 I can see Joe being a good way for there to be a "traditional" Kong in the MonsterVerse, for fans who miss when Kong was just an animal and not a kaiju.

    • @behindthescenesofthe8-bitg789
      @behindthescenesofthe8-bitg789 3 роки тому

      Problem with mighty joe young, think he’s owned by Disney 🙁

  • @Dontuween
    @Dontuween 3 роки тому +30

    This was Gene Siskel's favorite movie as a child. And I whole hardly disagree with the burning orphanage scene. It did pack a punch! I thought that he was going to die, but instead, he got redeemed in front of those who wanted to shoot him. Kudos to Willis O'Brien, Ray Harryhause, Pete Peterson & Marcel Delgado.

  • @zachary5845
    @zachary5845 3 роки тому +51

    Hope he does the remake too. That's the one I grew up with and I remember it being pretty good. Also.... Ape vs. Monster review when? lol

    • @mariovazquez4436
      @mariovazquez4436 3 роки тому +3

      I’ve heard the remake was pretty bad

    • @thegreatbaitster
      @thegreatbaitster 3 роки тому +6

      @@mariovazquez4436 You'd be surprised by how many decent flicks have a bad rap. Or just appeal to different people.

    • @AndyMFX505
      @AndyMFX505 3 роки тому +4

      @@mariovazquez4436 it’s actually a lot better than people think, it’s s a pretty sweet film overall and features in my opinion the best gorilla suit ever courtesy of the great Rick Baker and his team.

    • @pikapo16
      @pikapo16 3 роки тому +3

      @@mariovazquez4436 While the remake isn't a 'great' film nor one of Disney's best, it's still a solid remake. Better the original in my opinion. Charlize Theron as usual gives a good performance. And yes Rick Baker's gorilla suit looks impressively convincing. Even more than his suit in King Kong '76. Also I really love James Horner's score.

    • @mariovazquez4436
      @mariovazquez4436 3 роки тому +2

      @@pikapo16 better then the original? Doubt it

  • @Castle_Nottingham
    @Castle_Nottingham 3 роки тому +21

    This was always my favorite giant gorilla movie. He had a happy ending despite humans trying to exploit him. Kong and son never asked for the horrible things that happened to them. Neither did Joe but at least he had an advocate to save him.

  • @hyd3n376
    @hyd3n376 3 роки тому +6

    Even though this was Ray Harryhausen's first movie the stop motion is amazingly fluid

  • @andrewgrant6516
    @andrewgrant6516 3 роки тому +3

    No emotional stakes to a burning orphanage? What kind of monster are you? If dead children don't move you, I'm not sure I want to be friends. Kong has the better dinosaurs, but Joe is the superior movie, a masterpiece of stop motion, forced perspective, back projection, every trick known to legends of the artform. Bravo!

  • @JokerVoorhees13
    @JokerVoorhees13 3 роки тому +14

    I’m some ways I feel like Mighty Joe Young is a sequel to King Kong and Son of Kong cause of how similar they are and with who works on this movie. My theory is the character Robert Armstrong plays in the movie is Carl Denham but he changed his identity because in Son of Kong he was being sued due to the events of King Kong and that’s why in Mighty Joe Young he decides to help them take Joe home cause he doesn’t want to make the same mistake as he did with King Kong

  • @tannerbruning868
    @tannerbruning868 3 роки тому +8

    Personally I’d recommend the 90s remake, it’s seriously underrated

  • @johnwiswell4022
    @johnwiswell4022 3 роки тому +4

    If Mighty Joe Young counts on this channel, then I am counting the days until Tremors. :D

    • @nlmatta
      @nlmatta 3 роки тому +1

      You're damn right

  • @omniviewer2115
    @omniviewer2115 3 роки тому +23

    While the burning orphanage does feel kind of random, I think it serves more of a purpose than drumming up sympathy from the audience. In-universe, Joe is on his way to being killed because the world now sees him as a dangerous animal, but then he commits this act of heroism. Essentially, the inmate on death row saved children while being led to his execution. This is what ultimately turns public opinion in his favor.
    Sure, it could have been worked in a bit more organically, but I wouldn't call it totally hollow.

  • @ironman20740
    @ironman20740 9 днів тому

    I loved this movie as a child. My older cousins introduced me to it when I was around 10 years old.

  • @peterangilletta4993
    @peterangilletta4993 Рік тому

    Watch this movie many times as a kid. Great movie!

  • @garyreid6165
    @garyreid6165 3 роки тому +2

    The first time I saw Mighty Joe Young was on Thanksgiving when I was little. Joe was a real character in that he was very expressive with his face and eyes. I remember laughing and gripping the chair during the action scenes.
    The tug-o-war scene with ten strong men was funny and an exercise in futility because Joe was stronger than all of them. The little close quarters fight between Joe and Primo Carnera was a little silly but memorable.
    The scene when Joe goes on a drunken rampage in the nightclub was excellent.
    The fire at the children’s home seemed a little bit placed for convenience but it was a pretty intense scene. I remember crying because Joe did all that he could to save the little girl and getting hurt in the process. He was a hero in the truest sense.
    Actor Nestor Paiva played one of three men who get Joe drunk.
    Mighty Joe Young deserves 4 stars in my humble opinion because it was not boring.

  • @ChristopherElli-cc1ly
    @ChristopherElli-cc1ly 3 місяці тому

    Its great. Totally bought it as a kid. How can you not feel for Joe. And he gets a happy ending. OB had a sad career after make one of the greatest movie in Hollywood history.

  • @madsaltygaming7506
    @madsaltygaming7506 3 роки тому +2

    I absolutely love this movie, and great review, but with the burning orphanage, I always got the impression that it was connected to the plot as a way for Joe to redeem himself from the police. They were after Joe to put him down, and then he saved the kid in the burning orphanage. After that, it was showed that he was alive and well and back in his homeland. After he saved the kid, they had the opportunity to put him down but they didn't. So that would give the impression that they didn't put him down because of the heroic act that he did at the burning orphanage. And if that's the case, then it was connected to the plot since that burning orphanage scene was what saved him from being caught by the police and put down. So that was the reason for the burning orphanage scene.

  • @randallrona9618
    @randallrona9618 3 роки тому +1

    I never thought that the Mighty Joe Young movie I watched was actually a REMAKE of that classic movie.

  • @thebatmanrn8908
    @thebatmanrn8908 3 роки тому +5

    Was always a favorite of mine -- was the spiritual brother to Kong and in many ways his kinder and more empathetic side. This always appeared on the Thanksgiving Kong creature marathon and was a yearly ritual for kids in the late 70s and early 80s. The remake wasn't half bad and Ray (who did most of the animation of the original MJY) must have endorsed it, since he appeared in it (if I recall correctly).

    • @thebatmanrn8908
      @thebatmanrn8908 3 роки тому

      If I recall correctly, they reused one of Fay Wray's screams during the nightclub rampage.

  • @rickyrackey7930
    @rickyrackey7930 3 роки тому +22

    You need to review the other Harryhausen giant monster movies. Even Cloverfield. Maybe narrate some Kaiju related books like Operation Red Dragon.

  • @oluhamilton2121
    @oluhamilton2121 9 місяців тому

    The burning orphanage segment brought me to tears as a child. My mom's had to turn the TV off.

  • @catyear75
    @catyear75 3 роки тому +4

    One of my favorite childhood movies ! Still holds up well today - better than some modern creature features imho..!

  • @markburnstein5546
    @markburnstein5546 2 роки тому

    Saw this when I was young. Really Enjoyed it

  • @ShinGoji1987Official
    @ShinGoji1987Official 3 роки тому +3

    Incredible stop motion work in this one. Definitely better than the remake from the 90s. However that one wasn't too bad as well either.

  • @scado5679
    @scado5679 3 роки тому +7

    This film looks like an incredibly fun time that any Kong fan or otherwise could get a kick out of, and I might do just that if I get the time. However, there's something interesting I noticed about this (and don't read if you don't want a bunch of random theorization):
    This film looks a lot like it inspired an episode of Ultra Q, the series that spawned Ultraman. In that episode, a wrestler adopts a size-changing crocodile called Peter (what can I say, the show is wacky) and is pressured to make money off of his friend (parallels!) on top of being pressured by life problems and whatever else. Eventually he has to let Peter go when a nearby forest catches on fire (more parallels!). The wrestler's name? Joe. I can't help but wonder if Eiji Tsuburaya, a huge fan of Kong, saw this very film and decided to make an episode of his new show around it. We may never know, but if it was, it's fun to know that this movie inspired another special effects master.

  • @toddknaperek8225
    @toddknaperek8225 3 роки тому +1

    I always liked this movie and always regarded it as them going back and showcasing how far they had come with the medium since King Kong. Even by 40's standard it was pretty good animation.

  • @terrencegreene6523
    @terrencegreene6523 2 роки тому

    I saw MJY after seeing King Kong and Son of Kong- I just KNEW he was going to die.at.the end, I was just thrilled when he reached end credits alive. The greatest Harryhausen flick ever!

  • @parkerpshebnisky1051
    @parkerpshebnisky1051 3 роки тому

    One of my fav movies!

  • @unnecessaryedits2818
    @unnecessaryedits2818 3 роки тому +1

    I only saw the Disney version from the 90's, didn't even know about this.

  • @burnthetrolls5971
    @burnthetrolls5971 3 роки тому

    When they put Mighty Joe Young against those lions I was like "Stop Stop he's already dead 😭😭😭"

  • @kanyecheedar9170
    @kanyecheedar9170 3 роки тому

    Anyone else grow up with the 3 dvd set of King Kong, son of Kong, and Mighty Joe Young?

  • @MidoriNatsume
    @MidoriNatsume 3 роки тому +2

    Just like Tekkaman Blade has become an honorary member of the Mecha Genre, the movie should absolutely be an honorary Kaiju movie, despite not featuring a Giant Monster.

    • @jesusramirezromo2037
      @jesusramirezromo2037 3 роки тому

      Joe is a gaiant monster tho... he's at least as big as the Son of Kong

  • @randallrona9618
    @randallrona9618 3 роки тому

    I never thought that Mighty Joe Young movie I watched was actually a Remake of that classic.

  • @ek9509
    @ek9509 3 роки тому +2

    Good job on Mighty Joe Young, you should do the remake. Get the footage on Disney+.

  • @christianbontempo8859
    @christianbontempo8859 3 роки тому +1

    Hopefully you get the chance to take a look at the Disney remake of Mighty Joe Young, which is also amazing.

  • @bmvthemoviefanatic7282
    @bmvthemoviefanatic7282 3 роки тому

    I remember watching the rebooted version of this. Very nostalgic.

  • @GSTE_
    @GSTE_ 3 роки тому

    I can't believe I've never seen this.

  • @megalon73
    @megalon73 Рік тому

    I think This movie deserve a Five Star review more, Heck This movie did won an Oscar. It's does help it to not be a rip off, King Kong (1933). This movie is so much fun to watch.

  • @Gappasaurus
    @Gappasaurus 3 роки тому +1

    3:24 Stooooop, he’s already dead 😭

  • @freaknr1
    @freaknr1 3 роки тому

    I need to see this film at some point. The effects look downright amazing!

  • @gregpeabody8536
    @gregpeabody8536 3 роки тому +1

    Slightly off topic, but for those that don't believe in the Mandela effect, this is an example. Mighty Joe Young was one of my faborite movies as a kid. The thing that set Joe apart visually from Kong was that he was a white gorilla. There was significant controversy over Joe's fur color in the '98 remake. I read multiple articles about the director justifying the change. The scenes just shown are basically the same as i remember, but look quite strange with a dark colored Joe.

    • @christopherwall2121
      @christopherwall2121 3 роки тому

      I think your Mandela feeling is from confusion; you've got Joe mixed up with Kiko, the Son of Kong. Kiko was about the same size as Joe and could be seen as a protoptype or rough first pass at a giant gorilla with more character and a sympathetic story. Kiko DOES have white hair; Joe only looks like he has white hair because he's lit differently than Kong.

    • @gregpeabody8536
      @gregpeabody8536 3 роки тому

      @@christopherwall2121 I'm going to watch the original again. I've read the synopses and watched the trailer and clips. My memory is that Joe turns white from the nightclub fire, but that takes place in Africa, not Hollywood, in what i remember. You could be correct, but i can assure you thay the Mandela effect is very real. Some of it is faulty memory, but some of it is that people from different pasts are experiencing the same present. It's a quirk of quantum mechanics that physicists don't like to talk about.

  • @PrimeofthePrimates
    @PrimeofthePrimates 3 роки тому

    Can't wait for 1998 remake review.

  • @mesozoicisland22
    @mesozoicisland22 3 роки тому

    Oh yay! Glad you're talking about this film!

  • @MrEmilable
    @MrEmilable 3 роки тому +1

    This is What son of Kong should had been like.

  • @Guyverman01
    @Guyverman01 3 роки тому

    I look forward to seeing you review The Sinbad films.

  • @bluediamonddirector
    @bluediamonddirector 3 роки тому +1

    Love your work here sir. Keep it up!

  • @comicfan92
    @comicfan92 3 роки тому

    Can't wait for your thoughts on the remake. I remember it very fondly and it feels like a diamond in the rough when it comes to remake discussion. Never mentioned, not remembered, but darn good

  • @Denis-fp7ku
    @Denis-fp7ku 3 роки тому +1

    Terry Moore was hot. It used to be understood that monster films required a little cheesecake for the predominantly young male audience. This perfect big screen formula has been lost. Marry me Kumi Mizuno!

  • @jasonsantos3037
    @jasonsantos3037 3 роки тому

    King Kong and mighty Jon 2 of the greatest ape in cinema

  • @kgaventura13
    @kgaventura13 3 роки тому

    I had never heard of this film, will have to check it out for sure! It looks very intriguing

  • @The1larian
    @The1larian 3 роки тому +1

    IMHO This was a far far better movie than King Kong... and if you do not feel the emotion of rescuing orphans... I have no words. You call it a "been there done that" story.. but you completely overlook the simple fact that this one "DID IT" LONG LONG AGO...(70+ years ago infact) so while you may have seen such themes.. many of them were done here FIRST. Chief among them being making the "monster" the Hero of the piece. this was groundbreaking in its day.

  • @wallygator92
    @wallygator92 3 роки тому +2

    Will you ever review the 1994 film Orochi the Eight Headed Dragon?

  • @siricabennett6323
    @siricabennett6323 3 роки тому

    LOL this video was released on my birthday

  • @Hewylewis
    @Hewylewis 3 роки тому +2

    3:14 Los Angeles yuppies, not New York.

  • @MarvelMTs
    @MarvelMTs 3 роки тому +1

    3:05 Holy crap, that sounds like a recycled Fay Wray scream!

  • @benderbendingrodriguez420
    @benderbendingrodriguez420 3 роки тому +1

    I loved the 98 version growing up, each version has amazing special effects, but I feel like the story of the remake is a bit stronger due to the more likeable characters

  • @aurahoneydew9607
    @aurahoneydew9607 3 роки тому +4

    Speak for yourself the lion scene was awesome.

  • @sunnydayzie1202
    @sunnydayzie1202 2 роки тому

    I think it's much different from King Kong. It has heart, which King Kong really didn't have. There wasn't a true relationship between King Kong and the girl; it was mostly a "monster" movie. Jill is delightful. She is sweet and innocent rather than glamorous, not much more than a child. They have a unique relationship of loyalty and protection of each other. I think the orphanage scene becomes the reason they are able to actually get him back to Africa safely and restore his tarnished public image after the nightclub fiasco.

  • @frednichols9851
    @frednichols9851 3 роки тому +2

    What movie did you watch? Joe is awesome.

  • @ringkunmori
    @ringkunmori 3 роки тому +8

    My god you are doing everything in your path to not cover Ultraman. Its going to happen. It is inevitable.

    • @bk7064
      @bk7064 3 роки тому

      😂

    • @scado5679
      @scado5679 3 роки тому +3

      "Up From The Depths Reviews: Super Sentai (Part 1 of 44 billion)"

    • @TheHorns1996
      @TheHorns1996 3 роки тому

      I'd at least like to see him review the Showa ones, of the original timeline, like Ultra Q, Ultraman, Ultraseven, Return of Ultraman, Ultraman Ace, Ultraman Taro, and Ultraman Leo

  • @Irrelevant402
    @Irrelevant402 3 роки тому

    I don't care if there aren't dinosaurs for Joe to fight he got to survive and get his happy ending!

  • @ValnarianKnight
    @ValnarianKnight 3 роки тому

    Now you need to do the remake.

  • @dlee645
    @dlee645 3 роки тому

    I remember watching Mighty Joe Young on tv one Saturday afternoon when I was a kid. I thought it was a good movie.

  • @BerserkerCade77
    @BerserkerCade77 3 роки тому +1

    I love the Disney movie. Not gonna lie.

  • @mitchman3006
    @mitchman3006 3 роки тому

    Please do more Harryhausean films

  • @jprice6419
    @jprice6419 5 місяців тому

    The Tug a war with the strong men is great. I would love someone to redo that seen with strong men today. Maybe the Rock go for a swim.

  • @arcadedelprof
    @arcadedelprof 3 роки тому

    i actually liked the remake with charlize theron... but then again since 1998 i have not re-watched it

  • @donovandelaney3171
    @donovandelaney3171 Рік тому +1

    King Kong versus Joe Young.

  • @nicholascgear2002
    @nicholascgear2002 3 роки тому

    Can't wait for you to do the remake you're probably not going to say good things about it but for me I think it's a great companion piece with this original movie also imagine if we did mighty Joe Young but in the monster verse like what we could say he's like a lesser version of King Kong different species but still as strong and powerful but smaller that'd be awesome

  • @kme321
    @kme321 Рік тому

    How strange, I thought the 1998 was the only original one. Guess this comes to show the franchise never reached audiences as it hoped to

  • @bundleization
    @bundleization 3 роки тому

    I like this movie more than the original Kong.

  • @mousetreehouse6833
    @mousetreehouse6833 9 місяців тому

    The orphanage fire scene was my favorite part of the movie as a kid ("Save the baby, Joe! Go on, Joe!").
    The fact that Jill has to tell the reluctant Joe to go up the tree instead of Joe going up on his own, gives this a realism that the updated Disney Joe lacked - that animals are terrified of fire.
    This gives Joe a true character arc; not only does Joe save the the child, he rolls on top of her to protect her from the collapsing building, thus saving the child, and himself from the death warrent he was escaping.
    This is not a polished film as the update, of course. The new Joe is a wonder in animation, ecology, and is totally adorable.
    The original Joe is definitely rough around the edges, literally and figuratively. He has no problem pounding on and tossing around some lions, whom he possibly perceives as a threat to Jill.
    Anyway, the 1949 Joe was a favorite of ours on the Saturday late-night creature-feature shows. 🩷 🦍

  • @imurdad8359
    @imurdad8359 3 роки тому +3

    Review Big Man Japan, I wanna know your opinion on it. Personally I feel like it’s a quirky tokusatsu film that gets overlooked in the right sense.

    • @catyear75
      @catyear75 3 роки тому +2

      Agree100%! I’d love for you review this film !

  • @VierthalerStudios
    @VierthalerStudios 3 роки тому

    How do you get away with footage from the movie while doing reviews? My review of Godzilla 1998 got blocked in the US for that.

  • @eve3461
    @eve3461 2 роки тому

    This is the sequel to son of Kong

  • @nope5657
    @nope5657 3 роки тому +2

    Imma say it: This is a better film, narratively, than King Kong.
    I disagree with literally all of your criticisms.
    For as legendary as King Kong is, it's nothing but eye candy. And that's fine. But it's a more base viewing experience. It's a classic - one of THE classics. But it's more dated in many aspects that MJY is, and only becomes interesting once they reach Skull Island.
    Mighty Joe Young has more heart, better characters, and more meaty narrative, and one of the best stop motion creations in all of film.

  • @Grandmaster_Dragonborn
    @Grandmaster_Dragonborn 3 роки тому

    Review the Mighty Joe Young remake from 1998 😸😸

  • @naturalattorney
    @naturalattorney 3 роки тому

    If they don’t call the sequel King Kong 1933 I’ll be angry

  • @sabineb.5616
    @sabineb.5616 3 місяці тому

    While this movie is vastly inferior in comparison with "King Kong" and often downright corny, the special effects are absolutely amazing! The movie was done 16 years after "King Kong", and I don't think that the available technical tools had become that much more advanced and sophisticated. But the giant Joe- Young gorilla looks surprisingly natural and the movements are less choppy! I would've liked the original Kong much better, if the Kong puppet would've looked more like and moved like the Joe-Young puppet. I like the 1933 Kong movie for many reasons - but I don't think that the original Kong puppet looked amazing. My young son thought it was some kind of funny looking teddy, and I always wondered why it hadn't been possible to come up with a more natural look. The first director who actually achieved that, was Peter Jackson. His mo-cap Kong looks amazing - even after 20 years! Legendary's Kong doesn’t look as good as Peter Jackson's Kong.

  • @Robocopnik
    @Robocopnik 3 роки тому +1

    Considering how often there's a woman character written in just to be a love interest, turnabout seems fair, y'know?

  • @robgrimm9004
    @robgrimm9004 3 роки тому +5

    It's a shame Hollywood siphoned off this charming film with it's hollow 1998 remake. Always stick with the original. Since we're in stop-motion territory could we have a review of Black Scorpion please?

    • @jerrypadilla4384
      @jerrypadilla4384 3 роки тому +1

      I made my daughters (just kids at the time) watch the original, over the disney re-hash.... having seen both films, they loved the original, more.

    • @The1larian
      @The1larian 3 роки тому +1

      @@jerrypadilla4384 odd.. im a huge fan of the original, but i still loved the remake... "shrug"

    • @Assassin199410
      @Assassin199410 3 роки тому +1

      The Remake is Underrated and not "hollow" it has alot of heart in it of course

  • @Rinesmyth
    @Rinesmyth 3 роки тому

    Will you make one on *THEM* now?
    (1954)

  • @jabbarmuhammad7529
    @jabbarmuhammad7529 3 роки тому

    I wonder how this one compares up to the 98 version

  • @firery794
    @firery794 3 роки тому

    Poor lion....

  • @nicholascgear2002
    @nicholascgear2002 3 роки тому +1

    So I saw a comment where this is like the third Kong movie spiritually and work related making that a trilogy and if that's true would that mean that Kong 76 Kong lives 86 and mighty Joe Young 98 is like it's own trilogy because each one's like a decade apart and it's King Kong King Kong mighty Joe Young just saying

  • @TheGreatCrow
    @TheGreatCrow 3 роки тому

    I’d hang out with Joe

  • @TheHorns1996
    @TheHorns1996 3 роки тому

    I'd like to see you review Ultraman.

  • @frednichols9851
    @frednichols9851 Рік тому

    I usually agree with you, but I think you completely misread this movie especially the orphanage scene.

  • @barzap6190
    @barzap6190 3 роки тому +1

    Hey can you do mighty Joe Young The Remade

  • @iggycieplinski2082
    @iggycieplinski2082 2 роки тому

    I'm guessing you were too old to see this movie when you did.

  • @JohnReiher
    @JohnReiher 3 роки тому

    So I'd love to see your review of the remake of Mighty Joe Young.

  • @olyman3068
    @olyman3068 3 роки тому

    King Kong? More like Bing Bong!

  • @antoniobrown2318
    @antoniobrown2318 2 роки тому

    I don't agree with your commentary mighty Joe Young is a very entertaining movie even the part where he had to save the children from the burning house that was the show that he wasn't the group that they thought he was that he was a loving caring these that he could care for people thank you

  • @nocontentjoel1292
    @nocontentjoel1292 3 роки тому

    Early

  • @kaijufan54
    @kaijufan54 3 роки тому

    First

  • @williamneill5441
    @williamneill5441 3 роки тому

    I don’t like the look of Joe. Well animated but I the puppet design is unappealing.