But his invention works, the gyroscopic levitation is used in order to move it up and down it need more funding to actually be used in aerial crafts though. If you don't have it moving, and on an axis within a chassi, and a small grade change upwards, then the gyros would have to go upwards and stopping the movement would cause it to fall/lower, if you then move it towards about 45 degrees in one direction, then it will move towards that direction.
@@QuestionTheTruth yea i get it its just that it had been a while since i watched anything similar to this like a few months ago i was watchin bob lazars anti gravity videos...but now that im thinking about it i did click on this dude talking about pseudo vortex mathematics of some sort and he appeared to be an outkast so maybe thats why....but what i really have been watching are the Ufc promos for this weekend ufc fight..
And if someone could turn that thing into a high-speed bread dough mixer that doesn't vibrate and bounce off of a kitchen countertop, then that person would get really rich.
a lot of you commenters seem to compare this to a helicopter rotor, but its generating vertical lift without the manipulation of air or an atmosphere, gyros are also proven to still work in a vacuum they basically produce their own gravity. so it could be a perfect way of continuously producing momentum for a ship to move through space using only electric power absorbed using solar panels instead of fuel. if the weight of the gyros was increased as well as the speed of the spin it could exponentially scale up the effect. Everyone calling this an egg beater or new cake mixer is so ignorant of what has been shown in this video and shaming someone for coming up with new ideas is only being an obstacle to human progress.
Or you could just use nuclear reactor and have endless energy. This could be used in every autonomous industry. Imagine this for drifting on both sides on the back of a car haha.
Intuitively I feel like you could convert rotational energy into momentum somehow using gyroscopic precession.... but then if that was the case it should have been done long ago. So now I wanna know what I'm missing
Good evening everyone, It seem that my demonstration has not been understood. Can I correct that statement? It has not been understood by a small percentage of visitors to this site. Let me try to make the intention of the demonstration a bit more obvious. I will not attempt to explain my intentions in building my previous devices other than state that they all work. However when I was at school and technical college I was informed that a mass rotated on a fixed radius and at a fixed rotation speed would always provide the same result, whether it be in angular momentum or as many prefer in their understanding of centrifugal force. They are different animals but as I have previously said are both generated by the same acceleration. Howsoever I designed a device which would at first sight generate inertial thrust, a lot of inertial thrust, the success of this device depending very much on the fact that any increase in rotation speed would increase the angular momentum or as I have said the centrifugal force. Nobody anywhere at any time told me that if the rotated mass was itself rotated that the angular momentum generated would diminish. I found that all angular momentum and centrifugal force would diminish to zero if the mass was itself rotated fast enough. If however the rotation speed of the mass was reduced the total mass of the rotated system would eventually return . I am pretty sure that my device demonstrates that fact. The result is one which was incidentally at odds with the limited understanding of the academics who condemned my device in the local university. . That said I discovered that if I mounted a pair of gyroscopes at a fair angle of vertical offset (say an included angle of 90 degrees or thereabouts) as my standard machines, and with a suitable mechanism (admittedly not easily made) alternate the speeds of the opposing gyroscopes by increasing the speed of one and decreasing the speed of the other continuously. This should be done sufficiently fast to create an oscillation of the system due to alternating changes in the mass of the gyroscopes. I am saving you all about 20 years of development, but from here you can go the rest of the way there yourselves. Best of luck. Sandy Kidd PS Everything you thought you knew about mechanics is reversed in just such a system, and the result is almost unbelievable at its conclusion.
I have understood you very clear, why this was not put in a project. it is very clear to me that this really working !! what a big lost to see this not implemented or used by the government
Hi Sandy, I actually grew up right next door to you (2 Navarre st) I used to sit on the wall as a kid and see you go in and out of your shed, My dad used to tell me you were building flying machines. Stumbled across these videos quite by accident as I have an interest in space and engineering, and what a nice surprise it turned out to be, what a small world.. you can even see our old safari caravan in the videos which was my childhood holidays. these days I work in a studio and build valve amps.. Just ordered a copy of your book on amazon... hope your well
Magnets are the key to the osillation that you are looking for. And another thought read ezikiel. Gyroscopic magnetic levitation. You have about 30 percent. Done great work
Easy enough to fake the indicated lift on scales. And I'm sure that anything which creates some sort of centrifugal force can produce a certain amount of lift in tiny amounts,just not enough to fly. The cage of death at any fairground would probably fly off to a certain extent if not bolted down. Now that would be a ride!
Thank you Sandy. I believe you represent so much in regaurd to how hard work, precious time coupled with true passion and determination can be manifest . The gift we are all given by our creator "life" sadly for most , is waisted toiling away, like a rats on a tred mill in order to pay for the basic nessisties of life, which belong rightfully to each and everyone of us the day we were born. We are so much more than we know and are being lied to about EVERYTHING. We are all voluntary slaves for a tiny group of truly evil people who have manipulated Gods children . Off topic a bit I know, but you are one man who has accomplished amazing things. The time spent slaving away to get by should be spent by everyone , in their own amazing way, accomplishing millions and millions of amazing things, because we are all miracles waiting to happen. Thank you Sandy and god bless you.
One more thing- I'm not sure if many people get what is being shown here. First the assembly is spun with the gyros not spinning. The centrifugal force forces them outward and downward to repel the spring force, and the wheels are almost now fully outward or parallel to vertical. Then the wheels are turned on to rotate fast, and they then raise up again, because of the reduction in centrifugal force somehow. This is obviously counter intuitive. The mass is the same. The apparatus is still spinning at the same rpm. Why do the wheels raise up if spinning? They should not, spinning or not. It appears the mass of the wheels is reduced. If so the weight of the entire device should show less on a scale. Does it? And does it matter the direction of rotation of the wheels? Or if you reverse one of them? Keep in mind Michael Faraday, told he was stupid because of a speech impediment, was then homeschooled. He accidentally discovered electromagnetism when he had a magnet and it was swept past a coil attached to a current meter. He noticed a pulse. The rest is history.
The "loss in mass" is due to the force of the object. As the object spins at great speeds it basically "throws" it weight outwards, away from itself. This causes the gyroscopes to fall to a horizontal position due to this outward force. If you use the same rules as electricity for current flowing through a wire while spinning up th gyros, the angular momentum changes accordingly. If you reverse the gyroscopes without reversing the body the reverse will happen. The forces the will actually fight themselves either causing the device to slow, due to increased friction of opposing angular movements.
@@DSRRingMaster That outward force is centrifugal force. What‘s happening here is that when the gyros were spun this centrifugal force seems to decrease, hence the original comment.
Sandy's earlier videos show one of his devices suspended against an equal counter-weight; the device was not pushing against the ground or any other external thing. Torque was converted to linear, vertical, acceleration. And the device, clearly, moved upward!
Alas, the term 'hater' has become synonymous with the words 'doubter', 'critic', and 'sceptic'. But disagreeing with another person's opinion is not hate, nor does agreeing with someone mean that you love them. The love/hate phenomenon is yet another stupid adulteration of the language brought about by Twitter addicts with an overactive tabloid journalism gland who find that entertaining more than one idea at a time makes their brain hurt. Other words to be wary of include 'genius', 'star', 'hero', 'miracle', and 'custard'.
@@EleanorPeterson There's another word for someone who disagrees with you, they call them "Twitter addicts" I can't remember where I've heard it, but some people certainly use it
True antigravity would alter the gravitational field and I'm not sure if this does. It might re-direct the change in angular momentum so that the torque results in an upward force against the gravitational force.
Good evening all, Initially this demonstration was made in several separate pieces. . The device was rotated as demonstrated without flywheel rotation. . It was then rotated with flywheel rotation but without the return spring. (There was no lifting of the flywheels during this mode) . I did not at the time think that this was necessary and also did not wish to insult anyone’s intelligence, so I removed several pieces from the video, this part being one of them. . However it seems that I was mistaken. Because the rotating flywheel is itself being rotated does not mean that this mystical precession is taking place. It appears that there is a belief that any spinning disc is precessing as soon as it is moved. . My aim was to show that centrifugal force or angular momentum if you want it that way is generated inversely proportion to the flywheel rotation speed or inversely proportional to the system rotation speed. (The latter is demonstrated in Laithwaite’s large gyro lift, no magic just a gyroscopic fact of life) . This device was never ever designed to produce vertical thrust. It was designed to show simply one way of generating an angular momentum differential which can with a fair bit of cunning be converted into inertial thrust, although this next part is not so easy. Regards, Sandy. PS There are better methods but this will do for the present.
You‘ve missed the point of a gyroscope. In terms of its relation with weight, we can say it is able to transfer it‘s own weight (center of gravity) close to anything it touches, which in usual case is the fulcrum. A scientific gyroscope would have the same to say regarding of its behaviour upon physical touch in any of it‘s part. Trying to make it lift off is like trying to swing a pendulum without its fulcrum. Think clearly instead of deeply.
@@heavycurrent7462 Think clearly yourself. He is demonstrating the lost of centrifugal force and you are saying he "trying to make it lift off". Really? Plus, do you really know how and why a gyroscope can "transfer" its own weight to anything it touches? What's the mechanism? Why any other object cannot do such things? Also, why gyro can "transfer" weight when rotating vertically, but cannot when rotating horizontally? Have you ever think of it?
@@Thephilpw99 Did I say I knew the exact mechanism? I only shared what a gyroscope does plainly. Also, I was not only referring to this particular demo, but his entire effort with gyros. A gap of knowledge cannot be exploited at will. Btw, a vertical axis gyro does the same. You know what, at least read his entire comment, especially the last paragraphs, before jumping in as the smart guy
Sandy's part 2 video shows the gyro's rise as the counter balance lowers . This shows that the gyro's are communicating with the counter balance and visa versa , like earth to sun or earth to moon. Ether is a wonderful thing!
Why would an anti-gravity machine even need a counter balance? This is Hum Bug. Gyros merely resist motion in any direction except the direction of spin. No mystery there.
i built that thing 1974 i was high school useing old electric 6 volt fan motor from dodge desoto set up to drive triple gyros. the battery sat on the carryer of my push bike,then the gyroscopic propulsion drive i designed and built sat neatly on the head light clip .my brother and i would have turns ,battery lasted all week end you know those great big 6 volt batterys.gyroscopic propulsion works
They have already done that in space .they took some CD walkmans and played them and wow there was giroroscopic effects (,mind blown).Now if Only Sandy could convince Elon musk we could be all be living on Mars by next year ! And living like the Jetsons or was that ,Ren and skimpy,?
Dear Sandy, sorry for my english, but i want to say thank you for your work and the energy spent to develop your machine, which in any case will leave something to next generations to work on in the hope for a cleaner future. I was watching previous videos from 70/80 and i was thinking: Imagine what this man could achieve with modern technology! There are a lot of really good explanations on internet about why a gyroscope start the precession motion rather than falling under gravity force, all of them are really clear but still there's something that doesnt convince me. First because actually, gyros feel gravity just as a disturbing force, so their reaction it's independent if this force applied is on earth (gravity) or in the space (any external force). Stating that gyros create an anti-gravity effect is not correct. They do create a force (huge) that can be oriented in the direction you want by design. Of course if the vector of this force is in opposition to gravity it might appear as anti-gravity force, but i do think gyroscopic forces belong to another "plane". So the first big question is: What is the reference frame of a gyroscope? I prepared an excel spreadsheet with all the equations on bodies motion and gyroscopes physic. This is a simple rotating disc, mounted on one edge of an arm, the arm is connected on the opposite edge to a fixed center center of rotation. The classic gyroscope. I've noticed that if such gyroscopic system is designed within certain mathematichal range values the amount of work [J] executed by the reactive forces of the gyroscope is (in my case) 8 times more than the amount of work externally applied to induce such reactions. This 8 times depend from the inertial values and dimensions, I choosed such values to make it "constructable". The impossible results were analyzed using: A- controlled precession angular speed: Using conservation of mechanichal energy (Kinetic and potential), the work made by an impulsive force to accelerate the precession speed (kinetic energy after-kinetic energy before) is far less than the amount of work executed by the gyro reactive force to lift itself (potential energy after-potential force before). B- controlled spin angular speed: supposing that you can control the spin velocity (Ws) by an electric motor, and you calculate such speed to keep the gyro arm horizontal (tilt angle 90 degrees). The gyroscope arm will start rotating at its maximum natural precessional speed (Wp), being the arm horizontal you have the maximum torque induced by gravity. The amount of Precessional Kinetic energy calculated on such gyroscope mass rotating at that natural precessional speed at that given distance from center (arm lenght) is far more than the Spin Kinetic energy spent to sustain such precessional conditions. Note: to calculate the precessional Kinetic energy you can consider the inertial parameters of the disc using Huygens-Steiner theorem -OR- ignoring the shape dimensions, and considering only the mass of the spinning disc (which is more simple and gives anyway very close values) by using Ke = 0.5*mass [kg] *angular speed [rad]*distance from center [m]. SO: Where is this energy coming from? how is it amplifying the force ? It looks to me like if somehow the gyroscopic reactions can exploit the external force applied (even gravity) by redirecting it toward an efficient direction.. The dimensions and design of the gyroscopic system amplify this force in the same way an archimede's lever would do. But differently from the lever, all these happen in a 1:1 ratio of time, if we analyze it from the Power [J/sec] point of view, clearly the gyroscope is converting some kind of energy [J] being the time [sec] constant. Note that If i change the dimensional and inertial values i used in the equations, everything still work but in an inefficient way. I dont know if it is mechanically possible to extract such forces without disrupting the equilibrium of the system, but certainly - absolutly certainly - it is a mathematical curiousity.
Good evening Claudio, Firstly let me thank you for your serious interest in my work. After 30 plus years it is really refreshing to have someone see a little bit of the unusual in the demonstration. About 30 years ago I demonstrated this, at that time, unknown gyroscopic function to a team at the local university where it was treated with complete contempt. At that time I was claiming to show that I could control centrifugal force by manipulating the gyroscope rotation speeds. That said, and even at that time I was intrigued by the apparent ease in which the gyroscopes could overcome the centrifugal force generated in the system. I did much later come to the conclusion that the gyroscope by means of its right angle upwards and inwards acceleration when compared with its rotation or machine acceleration had the ability to shed weight (yes weight) as the gyroscope’s rotation speed is increased and vice-versa of course. Any loss of weight will in this case produce an increasing loss of centrifugal force until it has all gone. We now have the apparition of a rotating gyroscope being rotated at high speed if so required, but without any acceleration. . Any farther attempt to accelerate the system or gyroscope or both will be found to be impossible. I made a comment in 2004 on “Gyroscopes .org” forum something like “You cannot accelerate no mass. This point I called the “Saturation Point” for these reasons. This can be more closely compared with gravity accelerated precession. There are two places where a gyroscope can appear to float magically around its fulcrum. One is in a passive gravity accelerated system in precession and invariably in decay. The other is in an active mechanically accelerated system where the gyroscope has passed the saturation point, and is now proceeding to “freewheel” all the way upwards from the horizontal plane to rotate at its point of least action vertically over its fulcrum. Note The gyroscope axis of rotation and the device axis of rotation are now the same. There is no angular momentum and no centrifugal force present in either. Regards, Sandy Kidd
Sandy I believe in your work and admire your dedication over the years. In this age of 3d printing is it possible for you to make available some schematics of your designs so some of us can follow in your footsteps? After all this is your legacy. Much respect sir. Gary Bate
On 19 century, french scientists started to study spiritual phenomena, and discovered the presence of spirits between us. Then, developed an science, that currently is known as "French Spiritsm". French Spiritsm isn't so popular in France but very popular in Brazil, with 5 millions followers, from high and mid class mainly. That religion is a very serious religion, and the communication with spirits is very much practiced. Several books were made. There's another spiritualist similar serious religion called "Ramatiz", who created a book called "Life in mars planet", where they say to have written that book through psychograph with a spirit of a martian man. That book can be found in internet, but I didn't find it in english, but you have it in portuguese, in PDF to download or the paper book. I'm not here to discuss religion or making someone to believe in such religion and so on. But, in this book, whose I've read, there's a chapter which talks about the flying saucers. They say that, the earth doesn't know still the " magnetic etherical energy", the universal fluid, the creator energy. That energy is at space (ether) and in a no material dimension. All universe matter, is the "magnetic etherical energy" coagulated", I mean, all matter in the material dimension is formed from that magnetic energy. Alien ships use this powerfull energy to travel through universe. The flying saucers has 2, 3, 4, untill 7 rings which spin at very high speed, around the ship vertical center axis. As consequence of high spin, the ship creates an own gravitational field, that cancels the interference of earth magnetic field. That explains that 90 degrees movements who people observe when they visit us. How these ships don't use magnetics jets coming out of propellers, a flying saucer can't move in places where there's no a strong magnetic field. What I mean is that they use the planet magnetic field to move. Three simple controll levers create a instability in the ship field, so that the ship is attracted (dredged) by earth field by any direction at high speed. A flying saucer can travel throughout the solar system because the sun magnetic field, but can't fly in open space, being necessary a jet propeller. When I watched the video and listenned the author theory, I immediately realize the similarity with what is written in the book. I think he is at the correct way. What lacks, I think, is the powerful magnetic energy to spin the device. Nice work, from a visionary man.
I used to love the way that my front bicycle wheel could spin with one side of the axle resting on my finger as a kid. Then I got down to the business of fixing the puncture so I could focus on 'wheelies' or 'monos'. Was nearly a genius for a minute.
It's not antigravity anymore than if you were to hold weights over your head then propel them downwards faster than gravity would on its own. For the duration at which you are propelling the weights downwards, you would reduce the force your feet are exerting on the ground then conservation of momentum will cause an increase in that force once you run out of swing and the momentum you induced into the weights then pull you down.
The most part that I admire about is invention is his wife supported him throughout the development of his invention. I salute you and the Aliens out there may the Lord God bless us all.👍👍👍😀❤️👽👽👽
I skimmed through the video, so maybe I'm wrong. Centrifugal force causes the flywheel to spread thus pulling the spring together. Then upon activation of the individual rotary wheels counters the flywheels centrifugal force thus releasing spring compression. Not anti gravity.
Yes, it create the same amount of lift in vacuuo as it will in air: ZERO! This device is rubbish and its designer Sandy Kidd either an imbecile or else a huge charlatan.
Anti Gravity Machine (Part Three) 30 and a bit years ago when a device of mine {(the one shown in “Anti Gravity Machine (Part One & Part Two”)} was being evaluated at the local university I decided to demonstrate to the faculty members present something I knew was contrary to accepted principles.. I claimed that I could alter at will, the amount of angular momentum generated in a system of fixed rotation speed. I was informed very curtly that what I claimed was impossible. I subsequently set about demonstrating the impossible I had claimed that I could alter the amount of angular momentum developed in a system of fixed rotation speed by altering the rotation speed of the gyroscope(s) That device was not very different from the one I am demonstrating here. This is a very simple device comprising a pair of oppositely mounted gyroscopes (a balanced system is required in the interests of safety) The gyroscopes are mounted on vertically swiveling supporting arms and are driven through a common gearbox. My original intention was to allow each of the gyroscopes and supporting arms to create an angle of 45 degrees with the horizontal, when held at that angle by a pair of links and a central bias spring. It was hoped that the increase in system rotation speed would be sufficient to pull the gyroscopes most of the way down into the horizontal position. The rest is self explanatory. The successful demonstration when carried out in the university was met by absolute silence, as they turned their backs and walked swiftly out of the laboratory, as they do. Nothing was ever said, recorded, or reported, and never subsequently mentioned to me, at reviews or otherwise. This demonstration relates to a simple case in which moderate rotation speeds are utilised within an optimal elevation range. However this is just the first in many, of hitherto unknown facts, relating to the effect on a rotating system of gyroscope rotation speed alteration. It can be seen that many variations of such a device can be made and tested. When taken to extremes, the results of such experiments, appear to defy reality. We can get around to them. Sandy Kidd.
Eric Laithwaite was called a heretic... I have said, since I was very young, the possibilities that gyroscopes have and now they are in many things.. Perhaps I should look farther into your work, but I still don't see enough being done with them and almost 30 years have passed. I am busy looking into Viktor Schauberger atm because I think it fundamental to create perpetual motion before I die.. Anyone that says it can't be done is "retarded" (sorry for the harsh human words) at best because everything is "alive and in motion" everything is "energy." As Voktor said "Nature is my teacher." I have also researched Tesla and many other people. Perhaps try a "new" shape to your gyroscope. I'm on Face book give me a PM and we can discuss anything on the matter.
Garrywingle: I agree with your idea of trying a "new" shape to a gyroscope. It needs to be able to morph between a "benificial" shape to a "neutral" shape during each cycle. The continuous centrifugal force needs to be released as pulses - without the reactive force being as strong as the positive pulse.
Sandy, have you ever built a variant with large magnets as the gyroscope? Imagine two cylinder plate magnets with like poles facing each other per gyroscope flywheel. Let me know if you have done this. Also please let me know if one could purchase a kit like yours. I understand your drive and devotion. Very Best Regards, Jim
I suspect what Sandy has made, is a mechanical appropriation of a wave generator, that is able to produce a wave in 3 different planes, simultaneously. Think of it as constructive interference of momentum(eg. A spinning cone with a marble spun around it will climb upwards), in that the lift produced is the effect of the interference. Great to see Sandy is ok, as his documentary inspired me as a youngster - and I've been tinkering ever since.
@@benebene9525 guess you can't see the distance between the red color discs get reduced when the metal wheels were spun, this does generate an upward propulsive force, but not on the scale that can make the entire machine to have lift off
One element of gyroscopic precession is that a rotating mass, when accelerated across it's axis of rotation, will precess 90 degrees to the direction of acceleration, in the direction of the leading edge. A good example of this is a motorcycle stuntman doing a ramp jump. Sometimes they talk about how the stuntman has to be sure he's not accelerating when his front wheel comes off the ramp or the front wheel will pull him down. I've seen it happen, where a motorcycle did a nose dive off a jump ramp, because the rider didn't know about the precession effect. The same sort of thing happens when one or more gyroscopes is rotated around another rotating axis which is gaining speed, as in the experiment above. There are some other vectors involved but the temporary _lift,_ during acceleration of the main axis is similar. After the acceleration ceases, the party's over. You will find formulas for the precession forces involved, for straight-line acceleration, in any Marks' Standard Handbook for Mechanical Engineers.
Did this experiment back when I was 11 ( 1974 ) using similar bits from tape recorders toy trains etc, but used one supply not multiple. Concept works but no practical AntiGrav application due to materials available at the time . Our current building materials will only produce a short life model with limited abilities. Sandy Kid will know me as the one whom spoke to a relative of his regarding the subject. in a TANDY in Yorkshire back around late 70's. I would like to converse before it is too late as it were (AGE) !
i studied over gyroscope at its phenomenon. and now i seemed to understood what this experiment is about. he might have got the idea from 90 angled gyroscope turning itself under gravity. i guess this experiment won't get what he expected but i believe answer could be somewhere around this principle
Your on the right path but need a better set up. There is a better way of doing it. The lagforce of inertia outwards on gyros as well as orbital motion needs recalibration about 3000 rpm's on the gyro's and 1000 rpm's on orbit. I know I've done this experiment in 1959. It'll work. I used 5 gyro's for the same orbit and more mass and it lifted a 1952 Chevy off the ground. The basic math for earths gravity is: (Vo÷(Vr×2))="g"constant. Vo=Velocity of orbit. Vr=velocity of rotation. "g"=32.17405ft/s^2 So: (18.545÷(.288198×2))=9.80665m/s^2 I've always known what gravity is even when I was 5yrs old. To prove a point the free fall on Mars is 26.5264ft/s^2 so a 10lb weight on Earth would weigh 8 1/3 lbs on Mars. You could have NASA check I am right. I also have 7 laws of inertia and can calculate the free falls of the planet's. The missing constant of earth is: 2.000003382s^/ft. The rate "d" constant Sun's pull is diverted towards the center of earth to create the inertial implosion field the cause of g constant acceleration.
@@ATMega88 oh C is the speed of light in miles/ second.. And 365.2425 are days per year. And 86,400 are the seconds per 24hours. And 2 represents the rate rotation of the Earth diverts the Sun's pull to create the implosion field free fall. More accurately: (Vo/(Vr×g))=2.000003382s^/foot. As you get better at understanding my formula. I took the math from Ohm's Laws afor finding 1 thing knowing 2 thing's and changed it to knowing 3 thing's and finding a 4th. Like I said simple math.☺
no joke seen this in my dream just now typed it in to see what work had been done on gyroscopes and anti grav. weirded out rightnow never mind also coming from scotland.
Has Sandy Kidd taken his machine any further? I have been working with Magnetic levitation for the past 3 years. Your demonstration has helped me take mine to the next level. I was wondering if Sandy Kidd has patents on any part of his machine?
The only place to which he should take it is to the dump. He made several applications for a patent on his invention, but only one was granted (in Australia), and that went nowhere.
Ok that's the gyro guy spent his whole life in the garage many many years ago okay so now that we have it , with today's technology what have we accomplished with that device , other than to raise one inch above platform
What you are seeing is the SFA effect. If you are not familiar with the SFA effect then here is a clue. Sweet .... All. :) Use your imagination for the 4 dots :)
I was once a security guard on an oil rig in dundee the Ali baba latterly the emerald producer around 1990 to 1991 and met sandy he was working on the rig at the time he seemed quite an interesting bloke and quite friendly does any one know what he s up to these days
The change in acceleration (the spinning of the horizontal gyroscopes) is what causes the upward motion. If there is no change in acceleration, then there will be no upward force.
Mr Kidd, Amazing work, I love every bit of it! Question, if one was to send a fairly large, powerful gyroscope system - such to say, a supposed 'scaled up', perfected version of your invention, with it's own power supply - into space, would the effect of the gyroscope bend spacetime? I can imagine the interfering gravitational pattern spiralling outward from the gyroscope mass as visually similar to a tunnel through a simulation grid, or how a trampoline looks when you put a bowling ball in the middle of it. The metric of 'spacetime' would be sunk in a similar fashion. I reason this with the statement of the fact that the gravity created by the system would have to resolve itself in some way in the vacuum, and everything that creates it's own gravity in space creates some very large sinkhole in what we view as spacetime. If this is correct, might it also be possible that upon creating the interference, or void, in the spacetime, that the gyroscopic system might then relocate itself to another 'point in spacetime,' as a side effect of the spinning nature gyroscope?
You would need massive gyros at insane speeds to even reach the mass to meaningfully bend spacetime. I don't think you need to bend spacetime to use this technology in a propulsion motion in zero gravity.
It looks very much like a pile of bullshit to me. :)Nothing but an unstable conglomeration of mechanical parts opposing one another creating unpredictable instability.
In fact I feel saddened that in our informed world there are still fools who don't know their ass from grass.Thankfully there are still some left that have the ability to think along logical lines and have a smattering of scientific and engineering knowledge to call bullshit when they see it.:)
It's what happens when someone with no formal training in science reads a few books then tells themselves they understand physics...It's actually a dangerous pathology that ought be talked about more....The poor man has wasted most of his life on known bullshit.
@@Slarti Yep....You can tell the bull shitters, they get angry and tell you society is against them when you give them viable, physical explanations for what's going on.
@@7Earthsky I can explain what is going on and I am a software developer with no formal training in physics. This guy seems to have wasted his whole life on a 'feeling' when a 5 minute examination and explanation would have saved him all of this useless work. Granted if there had been a serendipitous side discovery his life may not have been wasted, but this whole thing just feels like he has wasted years of his life in pursuit of a dumb idea which he did not even try and falsify with a basic physics understanding.
I don't think you're actually changing the centrifugal force except in so far as the diameter of the precession ring decreases as the gyros elevate themselves. They would still fly away if you disconnected them from the central shaft. I think the lift is actually due to the torque, which is induced by forced precessional motion. The opposite of precession induced by an applied torque (e.g. due to gravity.) Also, I wonder how much weight you could actually lift with that thing. Quite a bit I would think. However, I've seen your other videos showing that the entire apparatus loses weight when it is spun up. I'm stumped on that one, but I read somewhere that Eric Laithwaite claimed to have "cracked" it without violating Newton's laws. Can you confirm?
Hi Sandy...just discovered you through prof Laithwaite.... in this machine demonstration, when you rotate the bottom motor the arms move down....centrifugal force...and when you spin the giro on the arms it returns to its starting night....is this not...just conservation of energy? With opposing spinning forces reaching a status or resting state? Your work process is fascinating and as a science film maker...bbc horizon pbs nova etc...I would like to talk to you about the process of inventing...to inspire others. Best wishes Simon Holland.
Professor Simon Holland About 35 years ago I had an idea that offered to deliver vertical non-Newtonian thrust, if I could somehow rotate a pair of opposed but equal weights at an angle above the horizontal. At the time I knew this was impossible but never lost touch with the idea. . Several years later whilst watching Eric Laithwaite’s Lecture on TV I realised that under certain conditions I could make the weights do the impossible and raise themselves to a position above the horizontal. . However, no one ever told me that a mass fixed at the extremity of an arm and the arm suitably in a circular manner, would if itself be rotated lose angular momentum depending on its rotation speed. This loss of angular momentum or if you like centrifugal force can be made to deliver all the text books claim or conversely nothing at all if the mass is rotated fast enough. In fact any gyroscope, apparently defying gravity by floating anywhere above the horizontal in either a gravity accelerated system or in a rapidly rotated system is if measured devoid of both angular momentum and centrifugal force. I am aware of the difference, but both are the result of the same acceleration and the concept of centrifugal force is more readily understood . I had occasion to demonstrate this fact to several members of the staff of the local university, after I made a claim that I could control the amount of centrifugal generated in a rotating system which had a fixed rotation speed. There was no comment ever made when I demonstrated that my claims were genuine, in fact they as a man turned about and walked smartly from the laboratory. . I was surprised at their reaction, but in light of the large majority of the comments made by some of the really well-informed persons on this site, I now realise I should not have been Antigravity has to start somewhere. This is a good place to start. . I followed this demonstration up by recently completing another device for the purposes of demonstration. This device is capable of demonstrating all of my claims. The device is comprehensively fitted out with rotation speed telemetry sensors, one for each of the two gyroscopes and one for machine rotation. It is also fitted out for strain gauges on the vertically swinging arms to demonstrate the loss of angular momentum as the rotation speed of the gyroscopes are increased the outputs being fed through a slip ring to the outside of the device. I can let you have a photograph of the completed device but I shall not waste any more of my time demonstrating any more on UA-cam methinks. Sandy Kidd
Simon HolIand Amazing that someone who claims to be a scientific film maker would take Sandy Kidd's nonsense seriously. Did either of you ever try reading a decent text-book on Dynamics? You mention Laithwaite - are you unaware of the extent to which involvement with Kidd and his naive ideas about thrust from gyroscopes quite rightly damaged Laithwaite's reputation?
The spinning energy force is from another place based from outer sphere and cant involve the gravitational uplift. This device takes more energy for spinning than just lift the device regularly
Several years ago, a video was shut down after 1 month. It was dealing with demonstration of thermocouple / thermopile that slightly loses weight when activated, and also on sensitive digital weigh scale. Heat must be released away from mass so as not expanding air pressure under unit in test pushing upward . (upside down) The word "correlation" describes other experimenters who successfully aborted gravity with their specialized set ups using matched metals according to ratios of properties. See 1800's work of John W. Keely with his "transmitters" as in series junctions of silver, gold, and platinum thermopiles as tested for gravity control with his array of tuning forks vibrators. He also lifted 1 ton platform with triple air pressure sirens at ratio frequency tones. The wire type nodes junctions multiplied the frequencies even higher causing dissonance to normal orderly gravity waves. A french scientist also lifted an open frame dirigible with sandwich plates at either end hooked to frequency transmitter. (translated from french) It seems there are other ways to disrupt gravity waves affecting mass..
Basically she's showing that the angular momentum of a gyroscope causes an object to either align with axial rotation or pependicular rotation. The same reason screws continually readjust themselves when spinning in space or why you can't flip a racket face over handle (or your cellphone in the oblong face over handle angle. The phone's imbalanced internals will rather see it spin like disc or do a barrel roll. Grab your phone and spin it all 3 ways. You'll notice that one of the 3 ways it will always also spin partially about another axis. That is essenitally what is being shown in this video. The tendency for a spining object to not want to be on an angle. This isn't anti gravity. If 2 fly wheels roll in the same direction according to their end on axis perspectives, the angular moments will head in towards the centre. You could then map the progression for each and notice that the momentum each arm increases. They will not want to move. Whatever holds onto the centre of the 2 masses will not change in mass whatsoever. The 2 spinning wheels will generate angular moments which cancel each other out in the centre restoring perceived weigh balance to the device. The faster the arms spin, the more perceived mass they have and so they would stretch out any object which measures their centrifugal force. That is all these videos show. Sorry to burst everyone's bubble. If you could spin a wheel at the speed of light, on earth it would resist the rotation of the earth. So to us it would look like it's rotating about a second axis very slowly. If you waited long enough, it would look like it has rotated around the sun alot, and the centre of the galaxy once with respect to our vision. Don't try to count how long it takes to go around the centre of the galaxy. It's a really long time.
I think these type of gyroscopes in pairs rotated in opposite directions at offset angle of about 90 degrees with regulated speed of each one are already used in the space probes to point antenna to the Earth or to main communication satellite. They use only electrical energy obtained by solar panels to drive motors of gyroscopes and do not use micro engines of orientation with expensive Xenon. To point telescope on any point on sky you need to rotate telescope just around 2 axes of rotation, the same with probes. In the last mission to asteroid Japanese used auxiliary probes without micro engines of orientations, they controlled their orientation just by gyroscopes and even used inertial trust to move probes back and forth.
This would be a good experiment to try in a weightless environment, like the IIS, to see if the rotary gyroscopic force really can produce linear motion in a straight line.
You know what you've done there sandy. ?You have created the new generation of mixers with visual appeal,you go to any kitchen or building site and ask the head chief what they want and they will say I want one of Sandy's friction on less mixers it could take us to the next level or cake tier
Sorry but I can't see anything happening apart from a few wheels spinning and there's people here saying well done etc. Did I miss something? Isn't it supposed to float?
You can add more wheels, and speed them up more and more. I think it will be a good thing if two mouvement (rotation of the wheel arount itself and around the axis) where not linked or attached
I didn’t go to school for this or anything I was a drop out so excuse my simple wording ...the original experiment only shows that it creates momentum on a forced vertical axis and starting from is equilibrium position with the counterweight (Bucket ) / Same thing on a swing ... I can create momentum with my legs that lifts me ... but only because I’m forced to swing around a fixxed axis ... ones I remove the swing out of the equation I can swing my legs as much as I want ... I would never fly If In this Experiment the device is standing and on a scale and „Tared“ to zero. Same thing, all you do is you reduce its negative force by 2 Gramms for a moment , that would mean your whole device could only weigh less then 2 Gramms for it to do something . 🤓✌️
I have seen the original device doco and think it has at least merit of more investigation and funding from the government or industry. What would really get the public interested is a display that shows it getting much higher. The other demonstration would be to show it in water moving horizontally over distance.
I truly feel sorry for him. The secret of the universe doesn’t lie in his contraption. The centrifugal force is equal to the force of the spinning gyros. Status quo/equilibrium. Newton’s third law in action.
The first glance I thought "this is a joke" a waste of time. The next day I clicked again. I don't know why but then realize what this experiment is all about. I have noticed you turned on the flywheels with the second remote and while spinning they went up! Very interesting!. Great experiment. But what if the gap between the top spacers where less? and it starts pushing to the top one? does the whole mechanism become lighter? Nice! I like the idea!
Wow ur fuking right ur absolutely right it can make the object lift ....if only someone would make a video on this it is the missing part of his puzzle
BASED ON THE SANDY KIDD PRINCIPLE ...I TOO CONSTRUCTED A DISK WITH 6 ELECTRICAL MOTORS ARRANGED IN A CIRCLE. THE IDEA WAS TO ROTATE THE MOTORS AROUND THEIR OWN AXIS IN TWO INTERLEAVED GROUPS OF THREE ......THE MOTOR GENERATORS PROVIDED POWER TO THE MOTORS AND GYROSCOPIC SYNCHRONOUS LIFT
Just wondering what would happen if there were more than 2 Gyros attached, for example: 4, 8 or even 16 around the circumference and all this placed in a vacuum enclosure, I wonder if this could be done and what would the results be? Very fascinating subject ;-)
Jack the revolutions up a few thousand rpms and enclose the entire device on a metal sphere and your getting closer. The whole thing has to rotate 360 degrees for directional purposes. Once you see it works reduce the size to a pea and incorporate a few hundreds of thousands into the hull of your vessel. You've seen those videos of hundreds of drones performing in unison..same deal x 100,000+
It seems unstable wobbling, it would shred at high speed it needs more counter force, needs some reengineering mmm? It needs an implosion force to work the opposite of centrifugal force from destroying it (Pulling it apart). You need the implosion forces to hold the mechanisms integrity together (pulling the structural integrity inward) to super succeed its given integrity vulnerabilities. The Gyro mechanism is at the MERCY of Centrifugal forces to fast the forces and vibrations would seize the bearings and lock it up...But if you are in a tug of war out need something to pull towards the center and not outwards to hold the structure better in motion. You will succeed its natural integrity go FASTER than it should and thus begin to WARP nature.
Because the device is loosely coupled by design, it allows part of the mass of the device to be suspend in air. It is these loosely coupled components, when being suspend in air (levitated) that register on a scale as weight loss. The real question is, perhaps through further experimentation, will the ENTIRE device levitate or will it only be the loosely coupled components? It's my observation, there's is a relationship between the shaft angle perpendicularity and the measurable levitation. It is quite possible when there is no more angle of travel remaining for the gyro shafts, the measurable increase in levitation will cease. Further experimentation is necessary to prove if this is a viable propulsion method. Pulse or rhythmic oscillation of increase/decrease to the shaft angle perpendicularity may prove a worthy endeavor to pursue, but until then this has only proven a limited range of levitation, of partial mass only of an object, via loosely coupled components.
holy shit it's the dude from that old movie and he's still in his garage!
But his invention works, the gyroscopic levitation is used in order to move it up and down it need more funding to actually be used in aerial crafts though. If you don't have it moving, and on an axis within a chassi, and a small grade change upwards, then the gyros would have to go upwards and stopping the movement would cause it to fall/lower, if you then move it towards about 45 degrees in one direction, then it will move towards that direction.
Lol
Lol ....hey why are we getting these recommendations???
@@HIRED7DAYS Because it is within a cluster of things that are kind of similar, what videos did you watch last, before you found this?
@@QuestionTheTruth yea i get it its just that it had been a while since i watched anything similar to this like a few months ago i was watchin bob lazars anti gravity videos...but now that im thinking about it i did click on this dude talking about pseudo vortex mathematics of some sort and he appeared to be an outkast so maybe thats why....but what i really have been watching are the Ufc promos for this weekend ufc fight..
Well, it is excellently balanced. But still fully on the table.
And if someone could turn that thing into a high-speed bread dough mixer that doesn't vibrate and bounce off of a kitchen countertop, then that person would get really rich.
No it isn't. You can clearly see the wobble. It would break and would fly off at higher rpm:s.
Definitely needs some LEDs on there.
a lot of you commenters seem to compare this to a helicopter rotor, but its generating vertical lift without the manipulation of air or an atmosphere, gyros are also proven to still work in a vacuum they basically produce their own gravity. so it could be a perfect way of continuously producing momentum for a ship to move through space using only electric power absorbed using solar panels instead of fuel. if the weight of the gyros was increased as well as the speed of the spin it could exponentially scale up the effect.
Everyone calling this an egg beater or new cake mixer is so ignorant of what has been shown in this video and shaming someone for coming up with new ideas is only being an obstacle to human progress.
Or you could just use nuclear reactor and have endless energy. This could be used in every autonomous industry. Imagine this for drifting on both sides on the back of a car haha.
Intuitively I feel like you could convert rotational energy into momentum somehow using gyroscopic precession.... but then if that was the case it should have been done long ago.
So now I wanna know what I'm missing
Good evening everyone,
It seem that my demonstration has not been understood.
Can I correct that statement?
It has not been understood by a small percentage of visitors to this site.
Let me try to make the intention of the demonstration a bit more obvious.
I will not attempt to explain my intentions in building my previous devices other than state that they all work.
However when I was at school and technical college I was informed that a mass rotated on a fixed radius and at a fixed rotation speed would always provide the same result, whether it be in angular momentum or as many prefer in their understanding of centrifugal force.
They are different animals but as I have previously said are both generated by the same acceleration.
Howsoever I designed a device which would at first sight generate inertial thrust, a lot of inertial thrust, the success of this device depending very much on the fact that any increase in rotation speed would increase the angular momentum or as I have said the centrifugal force.
Nobody anywhere at any time told me that if the rotated mass was itself rotated that the angular momentum generated would diminish.
I found that all angular momentum and centrifugal force would diminish to zero if the mass was itself rotated fast enough.
If however the rotation speed of the mass was reduced the total mass of the rotated system would eventually return
.
I am pretty sure that my device demonstrates that fact.
The result is one which was incidentally at odds with the limited understanding of the academics who condemned my device in the local university.
.
That said I discovered that if I mounted a pair of gyroscopes at a fair angle of vertical offset (say an included angle of 90 degrees or thereabouts) as my standard machines, and with a suitable mechanism (admittedly not easily made) alternate the speeds of the opposing gyroscopes by increasing the speed of one and decreasing the speed of the other continuously.
This should be done sufficiently fast to create an oscillation of the system due to alternating changes in the mass of the gyroscopes.
I am saving you all about 20 years of development, but from here you can go the rest of the way there yourselves.
Best of luck.
Sandy Kidd
PS
Everything you thought you knew about mechanics is reversed in just such a system, and the result is almost unbelievable at its conclusion.
I have understood you very clear, why this was not put in a project. it is very clear to me that this really working !! what a big lost to see this not implemented or used by the government
Hi Sandy, I actually grew up right next door to you (2 Navarre st) I used to sit on the wall as a kid and see you go in and out of your shed, My dad used to tell me you were building flying machines. Stumbled across these videos quite by accident as I have an interest in space and engineering, and what a nice surprise it turned out to be, what a small world.. you can even see our old safari caravan in the videos which was my childhood holidays. these days I work in a studio and build valve amps.. Just ordered a copy of your book on amazon... hope your well
Sandy Kidd I
so if the spinning wheels were spinning mercury vortexs. which would spin a lot faster. would it gain more lift theoretically. might break machine.
Magnets are the key to the osillation that you are looking for. And another thought read ezikiel. Gyroscopic magnetic levitation. You have about 30 percent. Done great work
I like how the whole thing sits on a scale to demonstrate the gravity part.
I liked the part when it flew off into space and came back.
I didn’t see a scale. Even on re-watching.
Yea he should try and measure the tension with a scale
Easy enough to fake the indicated lift on scales. And I'm sure that anything which creates some sort of centrifugal force can produce a certain amount of lift in tiny amounts,just not enough to fly. The cage of death at any fairground would probably fly off to a certain extent if not bolted down. Now that would be a ride!
@@oddjobbobb sorry,that was sarcasm.
Thank you Sandy. I believe you represent so much in regaurd to how hard work, precious time coupled with true passion and determination can be manifest . The gift we are all given by our creator "life" sadly for most , is waisted toiling away, like a rats on a tred mill in order to pay for the basic nessisties of life, which belong rightfully to each and everyone of us the day we were born. We are so much more than we know and are being lied to about EVERYTHING. We are all voluntary slaves for a tiny group of truly evil people who have manipulated Gods children . Off topic a bit I know, but you are one man who has accomplished amazing things. The time spent slaving away to get by should be spent by everyone , in their own amazing way, accomplishing millions and millions of amazing things, because we are all miracles waiting to happen. Thank you Sandy and god bless you.
One more thing- I'm not sure if many people get what is being shown here. First the assembly is spun with the gyros not spinning. The centrifugal force forces them outward and downward to repel the spring force, and the wheels are almost now fully outward or parallel to vertical. Then the wheels are turned on to rotate fast, and they then raise up again, because of the reduction in centrifugal force somehow. This is obviously counter intuitive. The mass is the same. The apparatus is still spinning at the same rpm. Why do the wheels raise up if spinning? They should not, spinning or not. It appears the mass of the wheels is reduced. If so the weight of the entire device should show less on a scale. Does it? And does it matter the direction of rotation of the wheels? Or if you reverse one of them?
Keep in mind Michael Faraday, told he was stupid because of a speech impediment, was then homeschooled. He accidentally discovered electromagnetism when he had a magnet and it was swept past a coil attached to a current meter. He noticed a pulse. The rest is history.
The "loss in mass" is due to the force of the object. As the object spins at great speeds it basically "throws" it weight outwards, away from itself. This causes the gyroscopes to fall to a horizontal position due to this outward force. If you use the same rules as electricity for current flowing through a wire while spinning up th gyros, the angular momentum changes accordingly. If you reverse the gyroscopes without reversing the body the reverse will happen. The forces the will actually fight themselves either causing the device to slow, due to increased friction of opposing angular movements.
@@DSRRingMaster That outward force is centrifugal force. What‘s happening here is that when the gyros were spun this centrifugal force seems to decrease, hence the original comment.
R Cannon seems to be the few who actually "gets" it.
Sandy's earlier videos show one of his devices suspended against an equal counter-weight; the device was not pushing against the ground or any other external thing. Torque was converted to linear, vertical, acceleration. And the device, clearly, moved upward!
Only a fool weighs a moving object using a method designed to weigh stationary objects ... and expects to get a meaningful result.
Thanks for the videos and for you dedication, ignore the haters if no for people like you the world would still be so boring.
Alas, the term 'hater' has become synonymous with the words 'doubter', 'critic', and 'sceptic'. But disagreeing with another person's opinion is not hate, nor does agreeing with someone mean that you love them.
The love/hate phenomenon is yet another stupid adulteration of the language brought about by Twitter addicts with an overactive tabloid journalism gland who find that entertaining more than one idea at a time makes their brain hurt.
Other words to be wary of include 'genius', 'star', 'hero', 'miracle', and 'custard'.
@@EleanorPeterson There's another word for someone who disagrees with you, they call them "Twitter addicts" I can't remember where I've heard it, but some people certainly use it
True antigravity would alter the gravitational field and I'm not sure if this does. It might re-direct the change in angular momentum so that the torque results in an upward force against the gravitational force.
Good evening all,
Initially this demonstration was made in several separate pieces.
.
The device was rotated as demonstrated without flywheel rotation.
.
It was then rotated with flywheel rotation but without the return spring.
(There was no lifting of the flywheels during this mode)
.
I did not at the time think that this was necessary and also did not wish to insult anyone’s intelligence, so I removed several pieces from the video, this part being one of them.
.
However it seems that I was mistaken.
Because the rotating flywheel is itself being rotated does not mean that this mystical precession is taking place.
It appears that there is a belief that any spinning disc is precessing as soon as it is moved.
.
My aim was to show that centrifugal force or angular momentum if you want it that way is generated inversely proportion to the flywheel rotation speed or inversely proportional to the system rotation speed.
(The latter is demonstrated in Laithwaite’s large gyro lift, no magic just a gyroscopic fact of life)
.
This device was never ever designed to produce vertical thrust.
It was designed to show simply one way of generating an angular momentum differential which can with a fair bit of cunning be converted into inertial thrust, although this next part is not so easy.
Regards,
Sandy.
PS There are better methods but this will do for the present.
You‘ve missed the point of a gyroscope. In terms of its relation with weight, we can say it is able to transfer it‘s own weight (center of gravity) close to anything it touches, which in usual case is the fulcrum. A scientific gyroscope would have the same to say regarding of its behaviour upon physical touch in any of it‘s part. Trying to make it lift off is like trying to swing a pendulum without its fulcrum. Think clearly instead of deeply.
@@heavycurrent7462
Think clearly yourself. He is demonstrating the lost of centrifugal force and you are saying he "trying to make it lift off". Really?
Plus, do you really know how and why a gyroscope can "transfer" its own weight to anything it touches? What's the mechanism? Why any other object cannot do such things? Also, why gyro can "transfer" weight when rotating vertically, but cannot when rotating horizontally? Have you ever think of it?
@@Thephilpw99 Did I say I knew the exact mechanism? I only shared what a gyroscope does plainly. Also, I was not only referring to this particular demo, but his entire effort with gyros. A gap of knowledge cannot be exploited at will. Btw, a vertical axis gyro does the same. You know what, at least read his entire comment, especially the last paragraphs, before jumping in as the smart guy
Thank you Sandy. I hope you change the world with yer gyro. I have faith in you.
Were you able to generate vertical thrust?
Sandy's part 2 video shows the gyro's rise as the counter balance lowers . This shows that the gyro's are communicating with the counter balance and visa versa , like earth to sun or earth to moon. Ether is a wonderful thing!
Why would an anti-gravity machine even need a counter balance? This is Hum Bug. Gyros merely resist motion in any direction except the direction of spin. No mystery there.
i built that thing 1974 i was high school useing old electric 6 volt fan motor from dodge desoto set up to drive triple gyros. the battery sat on the carryer of my push bike,then the gyroscopic propulsion drive i designed and built sat neatly on the head light clip .my brother and i would have turns ,battery lasted all week end you know those great big 6 volt batterys.gyroscopic propulsion works
Add 4 gyros as apose to 2 might get double lift and then put it in a vacuumed box for air resistance
3
3 and 4 are the deluxe models..
They have already done that in space .they took some CD walkmans and played them and wow there was giroroscopic effects (,mind blown).Now if Only Sandy could convince Elon musk we could be all be living on Mars by next year ! And living like the Jetsons or was that ,Ren and skimpy,?
Dear Sandy, sorry for my english, but i want to say thank you for your work and the energy spent to develop your machine, which in any case will leave something to next generations to work on in the hope for a cleaner future.
I was watching previous videos from 70/80 and i was thinking: Imagine what this man could achieve with modern technology!
There are a lot of really good explanations on internet about why a gyroscope start the precession motion rather than falling under gravity force, all of them are really clear but still there's something that doesnt convince me. First because actually, gyros feel gravity just as a disturbing force, so their reaction it's independent if this force applied is on earth (gravity) or in the space (any external force). Stating that gyros create an anti-gravity effect is not correct. They do create a force (huge) that can be oriented in the direction you want by design.
Of course if the vector of this force is in opposition to gravity it might appear as anti-gravity force, but i do think gyroscopic forces belong to another "plane". So the first big question is: What is the reference frame of a gyroscope?
I prepared an excel spreadsheet with all the equations on bodies motion and gyroscopes physic. This is a simple rotating disc, mounted on one edge of an arm, the arm is connected on the opposite edge to a fixed center center of rotation. The classic gyroscope. I've noticed that if such gyroscopic system is designed within certain mathematichal range values the amount of work [J] executed by the reactive forces of the gyroscope is (in my case) 8 times more than the amount of work externally applied to induce such reactions. This 8 times depend from the inertial values and dimensions, I choosed such values to make it "constructable".
The impossible results were analyzed using:
A- controlled precession angular speed:
Using conservation of mechanichal energy (Kinetic and potential), the work made by an impulsive force to accelerate the precession speed (kinetic energy after-kinetic energy before) is far less than the amount of work executed by the gyro reactive force to lift itself (potential energy after-potential force before).
B- controlled spin angular speed:
supposing that you can control the spin velocity (Ws) by an electric motor, and you calculate such speed to keep the gyro arm horizontal (tilt angle 90 degrees).
The gyroscope arm will start rotating at its maximum natural precessional speed (Wp), being the arm horizontal you have the maximum torque induced by gravity.
The amount of Precessional Kinetic energy calculated on such gyroscope mass rotating at that natural precessional speed at that given distance from center (arm lenght) is far more than the Spin Kinetic energy spent to sustain such precessional conditions.
Note: to calculate the precessional Kinetic energy you can consider the inertial parameters of the disc using Huygens-Steiner theorem -OR- ignoring the shape dimensions, and considering only the mass of the spinning disc (which is more simple and gives anyway very close values) by using Ke = 0.5*mass [kg] *angular speed [rad]*distance from center [m].
SO: Where is this energy coming from? how is it amplifying the force ? It looks to me like if somehow the gyroscopic reactions can exploit the external force applied (even gravity) by redirecting it toward an efficient direction.. The dimensions and design of the gyroscopic system amplify this force in the same way an archimede's lever would do. But differently from the lever, all these happen in a 1:1 ratio of time, if we analyze it from the Power [J/sec] point of view, clearly the gyroscope is converting some kind of energy [J] being the time [sec] constant. Note that If i change the dimensional and inertial values i used in the equations, everything still work but in an inefficient way.
I dont know if it is mechanically possible to extract such forces without disrupting the equilibrium of the system, but certainly - absolutly certainly - it is a mathematical curiousity.
Can I get a copy of your Excel spreadsheet?
Hi nate, thank you for your interest.
Give me your email, possibly with end to end encryption like pgp or protonmail (both of them are free)
tedpittman09 at yahoo dot com
Thank you so much.
Have you built any hardware???
Good evening Claudio,
Firstly let me thank you for your serious interest in my work.
After 30 plus years it is really refreshing to have someone see a little bit of the unusual in the demonstration.
About 30 years ago I demonstrated this, at that time, unknown gyroscopic function to a team at the local university where it was treated with complete contempt.
At that time I was claiming to show that I could control centrifugal force by manipulating the gyroscope rotation speeds.
That said, and even at that time I was intrigued by the apparent ease in which the gyroscopes could overcome the centrifugal force generated in the system.
I did much later come to the conclusion that the gyroscope by means of its right angle upwards and inwards acceleration when compared with its rotation or machine acceleration had the ability to shed weight (yes weight) as the gyroscope’s rotation speed is increased and vice-versa of course.
Any loss of weight will in this case produce an increasing loss of centrifugal force until it has all gone.
We now have the apparition of a rotating gyroscope being rotated at high speed if so required, but without any acceleration.
.
Any farther attempt to accelerate the system or gyroscope or both will be found to be impossible.
I made a comment in 2004 on “Gyroscopes .org” forum something like “You cannot accelerate no mass.
This point I called the “Saturation Point” for these reasons.
This can be more closely compared with gravity accelerated precession.
There are two places where a gyroscope can appear to float magically around its fulcrum.
One is in a passive gravity accelerated system in precession and invariably in decay.
The other is in an active mechanically accelerated system where the gyroscope has passed the saturation point, and is now proceeding to “freewheel” all the way upwards from the horizontal plane to rotate at its point of least action vertically over its fulcrum.
Note The gyroscope axis of rotation and the device axis of rotation are now the same.
There is no angular momentum and no centrifugal force present in either.
Regards,
Sandy Kidd
Claudio,
I've established a Proton account:
tedpittman11@protonmail.com
Sandy I believe in your work and admire your dedication over the years. In this age of 3d printing is it possible for you to make available some schematics of your designs so some of us can follow in your footsteps? After all this is your legacy. Much respect sir. Gary Bate
Sandy i believe on you too.
He is not Sandy he just random guy
He is sandy from the future... He has come to the past with this technology...
His legacy is a spinning pile of metal? how incredible :D I need the schematics, how else would i be able to build my own spinning pile of metal???
@@mrcityman2437Nope, I think it's really him: ua-cam.com/video/EnY3oevgwzA/v-deo.html
On 19 century, french scientists started to study spiritual phenomena, and discovered the presence of spirits between us. Then, developed an science, that currently is known as "French Spiritsm". French Spiritsm isn't so popular in France but very popular in Brazil, with 5 millions followers, from high and mid class mainly. That religion is a very serious religion, and the communication with spirits is very much practiced. Several books were made. There's another spiritualist similar serious religion called "Ramatiz", who created a book called "Life in mars planet", where they say to have written that book through psychograph with a spirit of a martian man. That book can be found in internet, but I didn't find it in english, but you have it in portuguese, in PDF to download or the paper book. I'm not here to discuss religion or making someone to believe in such religion and so on. But, in this book, whose I've read, there's a chapter which talks about the flying saucers.
They say that, the earth doesn't know still the " magnetic etherical energy", the universal fluid, the creator energy. That energy is at space (ether) and in a no material dimension. All universe matter, is the "magnetic etherical energy" coagulated", I mean, all matter in the material dimension is formed from that magnetic energy.
Alien ships use this powerfull energy to travel through universe. The flying saucers has 2, 3, 4, untill 7 rings which spin at very high speed, around the ship vertical center axis. As consequence of high spin, the ship creates an own gravitational field, that cancels the interference of earth magnetic field. That explains that 90 degrees movements who people observe when they visit us. How these ships don't use magnetics jets coming out of propellers, a flying saucer can't move in places where there's no a strong magnetic field. What I mean is that they use the planet magnetic field to move. Three simple controll levers create a instability in the ship field, so that the ship is attracted (dredged) by earth field by any direction at high speed. A flying saucer can travel throughout the solar system because the sun magnetic field, but can't fly in open space, being necessary a jet propeller.
When I watched the video and listenned the author theory, I immediately realize the similarity with what is written in the book. I think he is at the correct way. What lacks, I think, is the powerful magnetic energy to spin the device. Nice work, from a visionary man.
I would have been impressed, had the box flown away ...
I used to love the way that my front bicycle wheel could spin with one side of the axle resting on my finger as a kid. Then I got down to the business of fixing the puncture so I could focus on 'wheelies' or 'monos'. Was nearly a genius for a minute.
How do I get back this 3.5 minutes I just lost watching this bs?
It's not antigravity anymore than if you were to hold weights over your head then propel them downwards faster than gravity would on its own. For the duration at which you are propelling the weights downwards, you would reduce the force your feet are exerting on the ground then conservation of momentum will cause an increase in that force once you run out of swing and the momentum you induced into the weights then pull you down.
I understand what's happening except I think the design is inefficient...you need more speed and less moving parts
I think the flywheels are too large and you would benefit from prolly like 8 smaller ones it would be more aerodynamic in its spins
The most part that I admire about is invention is his wife supported him throughout the development of his invention. I salute you and the Aliens out there may the Lord God bless us all.👍👍👍😀❤️👽👽👽
Attach some solid rocket engines to it and see if it will defy gravity.
I skimmed through the video, so maybe I'm wrong. Centrifugal force causes the flywheel to spread thus pulling the spring together. Then upon activation of the individual rotary wheels counters the flywheels centrifugal force thus releasing spring compression.
Not anti gravity.
It not just about centrifugal, it relies on gyroscopic precession, but yes not anti gravity
Mr Kidd, would your gyro invention create the same amount of lift if it was placed inside a vacuum chamber?
I believe it will, because it doesn't depends on air at all.
Yes, it create the same amount of lift in vacuuo as it will in air: ZERO! This device is rubbish and its designer Sandy Kidd either an imbecile or else a huge charlatan.
That was the most awesome, high spec, and reasonably dangerous piece of machinery with absolutely no purpose, that I've ever seen.
This was the most stupid, low IQ, and reasonably dumb piece of comment with absolutely no purpose, that I've ever seen/
Anti Gravity Machine (Part Three)
30 and a bit years ago when a device of mine {(the one shown in “Anti Gravity Machine (Part One & Part Two”)} was being evaluated at the local university I decided to demonstrate to the faculty members present something I knew was contrary to accepted principles..
I claimed that I could alter at will, the amount of angular momentum generated in a system of fixed rotation speed.
I was informed very curtly that what I claimed was impossible.
I subsequently set about demonstrating the impossible
I had claimed that I could alter the amount of angular momentum developed in a system of fixed rotation speed by altering the rotation speed of the gyroscope(s)
That device was not very different from the one I am demonstrating here.
This is a very simple device comprising a pair of oppositely mounted gyroscopes (a balanced system is required in the interests of safety)
The gyroscopes are mounted on vertically swiveling supporting arms and are driven through a common gearbox.
My original intention was to allow each of the gyroscopes and supporting arms to create an angle of 45 degrees with the horizontal, when held at that angle by a pair of links and a central bias spring.
It was hoped that the increase in system rotation speed would be sufficient to pull the gyroscopes most of the way down into the horizontal position.
The rest is self explanatory.
The successful demonstration when carried out in the university was met by absolute silence, as they turned their backs and walked swiftly out of the laboratory, as they do.
Nothing was ever said, recorded, or reported, and never subsequently mentioned to me, at reviews or otherwise.
This demonstration relates to a simple case in which moderate rotation speeds are utilised within an optimal elevation range.
However this is just the first in many, of hitherto unknown facts, relating to the effect on a rotating system of gyroscope rotation speed alteration.
It can be seen that many variations of such a device can be made and tested.
When taken to extremes, the results of such experiments, appear to defy reality.
We can get around to them.
Sandy Kidd.
these experiment doesnt demostrate nothing
Eric Laithwaite was called a heretic... I have said, since I was very young, the possibilities that gyroscopes have and now they are in many things.. Perhaps I should look farther into your work, but I still don't see enough being done with them and almost 30 years have passed. I am busy looking into Viktor Schauberger atm because I think it fundamental to create perpetual motion before I die.. Anyone that says it can't be done is "retarded" (sorry for the harsh human words) at best because everything is "alive and in motion" everything is "energy." As Voktor said "Nature is my teacher." I have also researched Tesla and many other people. Perhaps try a "new" shape to your gyroscope. I'm on Face book give me a PM and we can discuss anything on the matter.
Garrywingle: I agree with your idea of trying a "new" shape to a gyroscope. It needs to be able to morph between a "benificial" shape to a "neutral" shape during each cycle. The continuous centrifugal force needs to be released as pulses - without the reactive force being as strong as the positive pulse.
Sandy, have you ever built a variant with large magnets as the gyroscope?
Imagine two cylinder plate magnets with like poles facing each other per gyroscope flywheel. Let me know if you have done this. Also please let me know if one could purchase a kit like yours. I understand your drive and devotion. Very Best Regards,
Jim
Sandy Kidd 👍
I suspect what Sandy has made, is a mechanical appropriation of a wave generator, that is able to produce a wave in 3 different planes, simultaneously. Think of it as constructive interference of momentum(eg. A spinning cone with a marble spun around it will climb upwards), in that the lift produced is the effect of the interference. Great to see Sandy is ok, as his documentary inspired me as a youngster - and I've been tinkering ever since.
No it is just a gyroscope. It spins. No anti-gravity or any other bullshit. There is nothing special about this contraptiono
@@benebene9525 guess you can't see the distance between the red color discs get reduced when the metal wheels were spun, this does generate an upward propulsive force, but not on the scale that can make the entire machine to have lift off
One element of gyroscopic precession is that a rotating mass, when accelerated across it's axis of rotation, will precess 90 degrees to the direction of acceleration, in the direction of the leading edge. A good example of this is a motorcycle stuntman doing a ramp jump. Sometimes they talk about how the stuntman has to be sure he's not accelerating when his front wheel comes off the ramp or the front wheel will pull him down. I've seen it happen, where a motorcycle did a nose dive off a jump ramp, because the rider didn't know about the precession effect.
The same sort of thing happens when one or more gyroscopes is rotated around another rotating axis which is gaining speed, as in the experiment above. There are some other vectors involved but the temporary _lift,_ during acceleration of the main axis is similar. After the acceleration ceases, the party's over. You will find formulas for the precession forces involved, for straight-line acceleration, in any Marks' Standard Handbook for Mechanical Engineers.
Well after years of avoiding the wife at least you can say you reinvented the eggbeater
Did this experiment back when I was 11 ( 1974 ) using similar bits from tape recorders toy trains etc, but used one supply not multiple.
Concept works but no practical AntiGrav application due to materials available at the time .
Our current building materials will only produce a short life model with limited abilities.
Sandy Kid will know me as the one whom spoke to a relative of his regarding the subject.
in a TANDY in Yorkshire back around late 70's.
I would like to converse before it is too late as it were (AGE) !
Sandy could have made it in TANDY ,? could have been a dream team in their Realistic range.iv still got a teasmaid and a sandwich maker from them!
Cool.... he spent decades of his life making a wobbly governor.
Any bit of lift, no matter how tiny would produce acceleration in zero G
Inventor without brain is very big pain for family.respect to his vife‼️
wow, my computer floated right off the table.
immrnoidall yeeee yeeeeshh 😁
And my Windows fuck alot when I am about to copy-paste
This type of apparatus is as convincing as the claim that magnets repel one another could cancel out the force of gravity.
Fabulous,,,, what does it do?,, mix concrete?
wat about spooling it up to an absolute max speed
This.. and making something fly
i studied over gyroscope at its phenomenon. and now i seemed to understood what this experiment is about. he might have got the idea from 90 angled gyroscope turning itself under gravity. i guess this experiment won't get what he expected but i believe answer could be somewhere around this principle
Your on the right path but need a better set up. There is a better way of doing it. The lagforce of inertia outwards on gyros as well as orbital motion needs recalibration about 3000 rpm's on the gyro's and 1000 rpm's on orbit. I know I've done this experiment in 1959. It'll work. I used 5 gyro's for the same orbit and more mass and it lifted a 1952 Chevy off the ground.
The basic math for earths gravity is: (Vo÷(Vr×2))="g"constant.
Vo=Velocity of orbit.
Vr=velocity of rotation.
"g"=32.17405ft/s^2
So:
(18.545÷(.288198×2))=9.80665m/s^2
I've always known what gravity is even when I was 5yrs old.
To prove a point the free fall on Mars is 26.5264ft/s^2 so a 10lb weight on Earth would weigh
8 1/3 lbs on Mars. You could have NASA check I am right.
I also have 7 laws of inertia and can calculate the free falls of the planet's.
The missing constant of earth is:
2.000003382s^/ft. The rate "d" constant Sun's pull is diverted towards the center of earth to create the inertial implosion field the cause of g constant acceleration.
what model and color was the chevy...?
timmy
Any photos or writings on your achievements that I could see?
How do you get 18.545 and 0.288198, and what are the units?
@@ATMega88 oh C is the speed of light in miles/ second..
And 365.2425 are days per year.
And 86,400 are the seconds per 24hours. And 2 represents the rate rotation of the Earth diverts the Sun's pull to create the implosion field free fall. More accurately:
(Vo/(Vr×g))=2.000003382s^/foot.
As you get better at understanding my formula.
I took the math from Ohm's Laws afor finding 1 thing knowing 2 thing's and changed it to knowing 3 thing's and finding a 4th. Like I said simple math.☺
@@alberttorres4917 Being used to SI it did not occur to me to check if the numbers were in miles.
Very interesting, thank you for sharing!
no joke seen this in my dream just now typed it in to see what work had been done on gyroscopes and anti grav. weirded out rightnow never mind also coming from scotland.
Has Sandy Kidd taken his machine any further? I have been working with Magnetic levitation for the past 3 years. Your demonstration has helped me take mine to the next level. I was wondering if Sandy Kidd has patents on any part of his machine?
The only place to which he should take it is to the dump. He made several applications for a patent on his invention, but only one was granted (in Australia), and that went nowhere.
Ok that's the gyro guy spent his whole life in the garage many many years ago okay so now that we have it , with today's technology what have we accomplished with that device , other than to raise one inch above platform
Any reduction in weight when transitioned to a zero G environment ((space)) would produce "thrust"..
Great was turning but not lifting, so what is here to see?
it is upside down this time, just look at this video ua-cam.com/video/OL_Gasok8xw/v-deo.html
What you are seeing is the SFA effect. If you are not familiar with the SFA effect then here is a clue. Sweet .... All. :) Use your imagination for the 4 dots :)
gianul psy op !! 😁🤘
I was once a security guard on an oil rig in dundee the Ali baba latterly the emerald producer around 1990 to 1991 and met sandy he was working on the rig at the time he seemed quite an interesting bloke and quite friendly does any one know what he s up to these days
The change in acceleration (the spinning of the horizontal gyroscopes) is what causes the upward motion. If there is no change in acceleration, then there will be no upward force.
Mr Kidd, Amazing work, I love every bit of it! Question, if one was to send a fairly large, powerful gyroscope system - such to say, a supposed 'scaled up', perfected version of your invention, with it's own power supply - into space, would the effect of the gyroscope bend spacetime?
I can imagine the interfering gravitational pattern spiralling outward from the gyroscope mass as visually similar to a tunnel through a simulation grid, or how a trampoline looks when you put a bowling ball in the middle of it. The metric of 'spacetime' would be sunk in a similar fashion. I reason this with the statement of the fact that the gravity created by the system would have to resolve itself in some way in the vacuum, and everything that creates it's own gravity in space creates some very large sinkhole in what we view as spacetime. If this is correct, might it also be possible that upon creating the interference, or void, in the spacetime, that the gyroscopic system might then relocate itself to another 'point in spacetime,' as a side effect of the spinning nature gyroscope?
You would need massive gyros at insane speeds to even reach the mass to meaningfully bend spacetime. I don't think you need to bend spacetime to use this technology in a propulsion motion in zero gravity.
The best way to approach this from a scientific standpoint would be to run this apparatus on a scale and compare the mass
Im not exactly sure what this video proves. All I saw were wheels spinning in a circle with no lift against gravity. 🤔
This is not the full vid UA-cam are on to this trust government lol
It is magical🤣🤣
The gyroscopes on the end changed their angle and went up
If the device can't lift the electronics, motor, power source and eventually a payload.. what use will it serve?
what am i looking at here?
Joshua Zeidner the device from the movie “contact”
It looks very much like a pile of bullshit to me. :)Nothing but an unstable conglomeration of mechanical parts opposing one another creating unpredictable instability.
You’re an ignorant guy Carl
In fact I feel saddened that in our informed world there are still fools who don't know their ass from grass.Thankfully there are still some left that have the ability to think along logical lines and have a smattering of scientific and engineering knowledge to call bullshit when they see it.:)
A machine you can use to chase away your neighbours.
Get it to lift the power supply off the table, then you have something.
Until then you have nothing
well it wont. cause the bottom will spin instead lol
I'd buy Sandy a beer in a heartbeat, you have to love his drive!
Regardless of how the gyros spin it is still connected to the ground All this does it orientate the axis of the gyros. SO MUCH BS.
It's what happens when someone with no formal training in science reads a few books then tells themselves they understand physics...It's actually a dangerous pathology that ought be talked about more....The poor man has wasted most of his life on known bullshit.
@@7Earthsky he seems to have missed the most important part of scientific study which is to try and prove that he was wrong.
@@Slarti Yep....You can tell the bull shitters, they get angry and tell you society is against them when you give them viable, physical explanations for what's going on.
@@7Earthsky I can explain what is going on and I am a software developer with no formal training in physics. This guy seems to have wasted his whole life on a 'feeling' when a 5 minute examination and explanation would have saved him all of this useless work. Granted if there had been a serendipitous side discovery his life may not have been wasted, but this whole thing just feels like he has wasted years of his life in pursuit of a dumb idea which he did not even try and falsify with a basic physics understanding.
@@Slarti As Carl Sagan said ''Science is as much a way of thinking as it is a body of knowledge''.....His way of thinking was his real problem.
Wow it actually went up...amazing and I don't care what anyone says about.
Show me the space under the box if you think it lifted all that happened was the Gyro axis lined up.
Lol you do realise the only reason the lower red disk goes up is because the arm attached to it gets pulled inwards by a motor...
Study next time in school. I merely lines up with the rotation of the earth. If it floated in the air then I would be impressed.
I don't think you're actually changing the centrifugal force except in so far as the diameter of the precession ring decreases as the gyros elevate themselves. They would still fly away if you disconnected them from the central shaft. I think the lift is actually due to the torque, which is induced by forced precessional motion. The opposite of precession induced by an applied torque (e.g. due to gravity.) Also, I wonder how much weight you could actually lift with that thing. Quite a bit I would think.
However, I've seen your other videos showing that the entire apparatus loses weight when it is spun up. I'm stumped on that one, but I read somewhere that Eric Laithwaite claimed to have "cracked" it without violating Newton's laws. Can you confirm?
For those who'll believe anything.
@Alex Jay 😂😂😂😂😂
@Alex Jay lol
Hi Sandy...just discovered you through prof Laithwaite.... in this machine demonstration, when you rotate the bottom motor the arms move down....centrifugal force...and when you spin the giro on the arms it returns to its starting night....is this not...just conservation of energy? With opposing spinning forces reaching a status or resting state? Your work process is fascinating and as a science film maker...bbc horizon pbs nova etc...I would like to talk to you about the process of inventing...to inspire others. Best wishes Simon Holland.
Professor Simon Holland
About 35 years ago I had an idea that offered to deliver vertical non-Newtonian thrust, if I could somehow rotate a pair of opposed but equal weights at an angle above the horizontal.
At the time I knew this was impossible but never lost touch with the idea.
.
Several years later whilst watching Eric Laithwaite’s Lecture on TV I realised that under certain conditions I could make the weights do the impossible and raise themselves to a position above the horizontal.
.
However, no one ever told me that a mass fixed at the extremity of an arm and the arm suitably in a circular manner, would if itself be rotated lose angular momentum depending on its rotation speed.
This loss of angular momentum or if you like centrifugal force can be made to deliver all the text books claim or conversely nothing at all if the mass is rotated fast enough.
In fact any gyroscope, apparently defying gravity by floating anywhere above the horizontal in either a gravity accelerated system or in a rapidly rotated system is if measured devoid of both angular momentum and centrifugal force.
I am aware of the difference, but both are the result of the same acceleration and the concept of centrifugal force is more readily understood
.
I had occasion to demonstrate this fact to several members of the staff of the local university, after I made a claim that I could control the amount of centrifugal generated in a rotating system which had a fixed rotation speed.
There was no comment ever made when I demonstrated that my claims were genuine, in fact they as a man turned about and walked smartly from the laboratory.
.
I was surprised at their reaction, but in light of the large majority of the comments made by some of the really well-informed persons on this site, I now realise I should not have been
Antigravity has to start somewhere.
This is a good place to start.
.
I followed this demonstration up by recently completing another device for the purposes of demonstration.
This device is capable of demonstrating all of my claims.
The device is comprehensively fitted out with rotation speed telemetry sensors, one for each of the two gyroscopes and one for machine rotation.
It is also fitted out for strain gauges on the vertically swinging arms to demonstrate the loss of angular momentum as the rotation speed of the gyroscopes are increased the outputs being fed through a slip ring to the outside of the device.
I can let you have a photograph of the completed device but I shall not waste any more of my time demonstrating any more on UA-cam methinks.
Sandy Kidd
Simon HolIand Amazing that someone who claims to be a scientific film maker would take Sandy Kidd's nonsense seriously. Did either of you ever try reading a decent text-book on Dynamics? You mention Laithwaite - are you unaware of the extent to which involvement with Kidd and his naive ideas about thrust from gyroscopes quite rightly damaged Laithwaite's reputation?
What about thurst and direction. Hard to imagine with this. I think repulsive magnetic resonance is the key. Any applications designer please connect.
Back to the drawing board..
What happens if only a single gyro arm were attached? What if the weights were heavier metal? What happens if you spin it at 10x the speed?
The spinning energy force is from another place based from outer sphere and cant involve the gravitational uplift. This device takes more energy for spinning than just lift the device regularly
Several years ago, a video was shut down after 1 month. It was dealing
with demonstration of thermocouple / thermopile that slightly loses
weight when activated, and also on sensitive digital weigh scale. Heat
must be released away from mass so as not expanding air pressure under
unit in test pushing upward . (upside down) The word "correlation"
describes other experimenters who successfully aborted gravity with
their specialized set ups using matched metals according to ratios of
properties. See 1800's work of John W. Keely with his "transmitters" as
in series junctions of silver, gold, and platinum thermopiles as
tested for gravity control with his array of tuning forks vibrators. He also lifted 1 ton platform with triple air pressure sirens at ratio frequency tones.
The wire type nodes junctions multiplied the frequencies even higher causing
dissonance to normal orderly gravity waves. A french scientist also
lifted an open frame dirigible with sandwich plates at either end hooked
to frequency transmitter. (translated from french) It seems there are
other ways to disrupt gravity waves affecting mass..
Basically she's showing that the angular momentum of a gyroscope causes an object to either align with axial rotation or pependicular rotation. The same reason screws continually readjust themselves when spinning in space or why you can't flip a racket face over handle (or your cellphone in the oblong face over handle angle. The phone's imbalanced internals will rather see it spin like disc or do a barrel roll.
Grab your phone and spin it all 3 ways. You'll notice that one of the 3 ways it will always also spin partially about another axis. That is essenitally what is being shown in this video. The tendency for a spining object to not want to be on an angle. This isn't anti gravity. If 2 fly wheels roll in the same direction according to their end on axis perspectives, the angular moments will head in towards the centre. You could then map the progression for each and notice that the momentum each arm increases. They will not want to move. Whatever holds onto the centre of the 2 masses will not change in mass whatsoever. The 2 spinning wheels will generate angular moments which cancel each other out in the centre restoring perceived weigh balance to the device. The faster the arms spin, the more perceived mass they have and so they would stretch out any object which measures their centrifugal force.
That is all these videos show. Sorry to burst everyone's bubble.
If you could spin a wheel at the speed of light, on earth it would resist the rotation of the earth. So to us it would look like it's rotating about a second axis very slowly. If you waited long enough, it would look like it has rotated around the sun alot, and the centre of the galaxy once with respect to our vision. Don't try to count how long it takes to go around the centre of the galaxy. It's a really long time.
Nice experiment. Congratulations, you are very close to discovery.
Stop calling this antigravity, that's not what it is
I think these type of gyroscopes in pairs rotated in opposite directions at offset angle of about 90 degrees with regulated speed of each one are already used in the space probes to point antenna to the Earth or to main communication satellite. They use only electrical energy obtained by solar panels to drive motors of gyroscopes and do not use micro engines of orientation with expensive Xenon. To point telescope on any point on sky you need to rotate telescope just around 2 axes of rotation, the same with probes. In the last mission to asteroid Japanese used auxiliary probes without micro engines of orientations, they controlled their orientation just by gyroscopes and even used inertial trust to move probes back and forth.
Put some rotors on there, and it will fly ;)
It already flies without rotors.. omfg.... did you not watch the video? It flies.... holy shit.
Sandy, why didn't this invention get fully commercialised?
Probably because it did not do anything but spin and wiggle.
This would be a good experiment to try in a weightless environment, like the IIS, to see if the rotary gyroscopic force really can produce linear motion in a straight line.
Looks like a demented helicopter mast without the blades!
Excellent engineering! Well done top Man! 🌟✨🤛
Put a weighing scale under the device. If it does truly lift. The box weight will surly fall???
You know what you've done there sandy. ?You have created the new generation of mixers with visual appeal,you go to any kitchen or building site and ask the head chief what they want and they will say I want one of Sandy's friction on less mixers it could take us to the next level or cake tier
Time machine, the portal was opening and I could see a t-rex waving at me
Sorry but I can't see anything happening apart from a few wheels spinning and there's people here saying well done etc. Did I miss something? Isn't it supposed to float?
You can add more wheels, and speed them up more and more. I think it will be a good thing if two mouvement (rotation of the wheel arount itself and around the axis) where not linked or attached
I didn’t go to school for this or anything I was a drop out so excuse my simple wording ...the original experiment only shows that it creates momentum on a forced vertical axis and starting from is equilibrium position with the counterweight (Bucket ) / Same thing on a swing ... I can create momentum with my legs that lifts me ... but only because I’m forced to swing around a fixxed axis ... ones I remove the swing out of the equation I can swing my legs as much as I want ... I would never fly
If In this Experiment the device is standing and on a scale and „Tared“ to zero. Same thing, all you do is you reduce its negative force by 2 Gramms for a moment , that would mean your whole device could only weigh less then 2 Gramms for it to do something . 🤓✌️
I have seen the original device doco and think it has at least merit of more investigation and funding from the government or industry. What would really get the public interested is a display that shows it getting much higher. The other demonstration would be to show it in water moving horizontally over distance.
How much power does it need to lift the box
I had a dream last night about a pyramidal shaped device with two frequencies, 68hz and 72hz to be used. I searched 68hz and this comes up, weird.
But where do you put the Element 115?
Mr Kidd was a guy on james bond 007 diamonds are foreverhedelivered the Bomb de le surprise to Sean Connory .
I truly feel sorry for him. The secret of the universe doesn’t lie in his contraption. The centrifugal force is equal to the force of the spinning gyros. Status quo/equilibrium. Newton’s third law in action.
I just watched a self propelled merry go round ?
the end is wierd. what are the yellow sparks
The first glance I thought "this is a joke" a waste of time. The next day I clicked again. I don't know why but then realize what this experiment is all about. I have noticed you turned on the flywheels with the second remote and while spinning they went up!
Very interesting!. Great experiment. But what if the gap between the top spacers where less? and it starts pushing to the top one? does the whole mechanism become lighter? Nice! I like the idea!
Wow ur fuking right ur absolutely right it can make the object lift ....if only someone would make a video on this it is the missing part of his puzzle
I see so you rotated the discs three times and the result was up force ... Interesting
But in a weightless environment this has to be tested.
Edit I take back it need not be tested in vacuum. It is very efficient.
Is the power being converted into downforce?
BASED ON THE SANDY KIDD PRINCIPLE ...I TOO CONSTRUCTED A DISK WITH 6 ELECTRICAL MOTORS ARRANGED IN A CIRCLE. THE IDEA WAS TO ROTATE THE MOTORS AROUND THEIR OWN AXIS IN TWO INTERLEAVED GROUPS OF THREE ......THE MOTOR GENERATORS PROVIDED POWER TO THE MOTORS AND GYROSCOPIC SYNCHRONOUS LIFT
Just wondering what would happen if there were more than 2 Gyros attached, for example: 4, 8 or even 16 around the circumference and all this placed in a vacuum enclosure, I wonder if this could be done and what would the results be?
Very fascinating subject ;-)
A lot more time and money spent. That's all.
It dont look anti gravity, what is this, maybe if in middle of boat below, something like this, even waves cannot push it? Like can stall at a place?
I just dont get it I dont see anything showing me that there is anti gravity involved at all, all its doing is spinning really fast
Jack the revolutions up a few thousand rpms and enclose the entire device on a metal sphere and your getting closer. The whole thing has to rotate 360 degrees for directional purposes. Once you see it works reduce the size to a pea and incorporate a few hundreds of thousands into the hull of your vessel. You've seen those videos of hundreds of drones performing in unison..same deal x 100,000+
Is this podcast an admission that his experiment was a dead end, or is it trying to kill earlier podcasts? Why is there no commentary?
It seems unstable wobbling, it would shred at high speed it needs more counter force, needs some reengineering mmm? It needs an implosion force to work the opposite of centrifugal force from destroying it (Pulling it apart). You need the implosion forces to hold the mechanisms integrity together (pulling the structural integrity inward) to super succeed its given integrity vulnerabilities. The Gyro mechanism is at the MERCY of Centrifugal forces to fast the forces and vibrations would seize the bearings and lock it up...But if you are in a tug of war out need something to pull towards the center and not outwards to hold the structure better in motion. You will succeed its natural integrity go FASTER than it should and thus begin to WARP nature.
Because the device is loosely coupled by design, it allows part of the mass of the device to be suspend in air. It is these loosely coupled components, when being suspend in air (levitated) that register on a scale as weight loss. The real question is, perhaps through further experimentation, will the ENTIRE device levitate or will it only be the loosely coupled components? It's my observation, there's is a relationship between the shaft angle perpendicularity and the measurable levitation. It is quite possible when there is no more angle of travel remaining for the gyro shafts, the measurable increase in levitation will cease. Further experimentation is necessary to prove if this is a viable propulsion method. Pulse or rhythmic oscillation of increase/decrease to the shaft angle perpendicularity may prove a worthy endeavor to pursue, but until then this has only proven a limited range of levitation, of partial mass only of an object, via loosely coupled components.
Help! Its me Sandy I am trapped in the anti gravitational void damn machine! It works though it really works save me!
I do believe the power from the momentum of these things are yet to have been conquer by humans.