Oppenheimer will clean up but I think Killers may get best film and best actress and Hold overs best actor for Giamatti, best supporting R Downey Jr. was brilliant. As a side note I agree this year is a good year for nominees, last year No Bueno.
I would be pretty surprised if "Killers" wins... but not mad at all! I worry it's not going to get many, the way so many Scorsese films leave empty handed. -Ev
Everyone loves Paul, that SAG voted a nom american over him. 😂 Lol, loving someone, and thinking they should get an oscar is different business in Hollywood.
But we are NEVER wrong, Tanay. It says so right in the thumbnail! Here are my real picks (unconstrained by the "draft process" in this episode). Which ones do you think are wrong? Picture - Oppenheimer Director - Nolan Actress - Gladstone Actor - Cillian Supp. Actress - Randolph Supp. Actor - RDJ Original - Anatomy of a Fall Adapted - Barbie Cinematography - Oppenheimer Editing - Killers of the Flower Moon Intl. Film - The Zone of Interest Production Design - Poor Things Makeup & Hairstyling - Maestro Costume - Poor Things Animated - The Boy and the Heron Doc - 20 Days in Mariupol Sound - The Zone of Interest Visual Effects - Godzilla Minus One Score - Oppenheimer Song - Barbie/Billie Eilish -Ev
Editing for sure. That’s Jennifer Lame’s to lose. It’s not a race at all. Barbie for Adapted has promise, but it’s hard to bet against the run that American Fiction has been on.
@@TheBluffCouncil editing and adapted. Sound is leaning towards Oppie but zone has a chance so thats fine. But adapted is most likely american fiction with Oppie in second.
@@TanayGupta-vd6cz Yeah, Schoonmaker is probably just wishful thinking for me, as I want "Killers" to be more awarded than it is going to be. And I just think "Barbie" will get a boost from voters who voted reactively to the "snubs." But we shall see!
I think it’s a travesty you made a video about who could win and you haven’t seen several films nominated. I have a full time job not related and I managed to see all the major categories. It’s sad because I would bet a lot of academy voters didn’t either and vote on what’s popular or with their unconscious bias. SMH
A TRAVESTY!? Yes, absolutely. A travesty. Though to be fair, we didn’t make a video about who we think SHOULD win, we made a video about who we think WILL win. Theoretically, one could make a pretty damn accurate list of predictions having seen NONE of the nominated films. But having seen almost every single one outside of the documentaries and “Rustin” (which I refuse to watch, did you SEE those green screen shots!?), I think we have a decent idea. But sadly, I think you’re right, and a lot of voters probably don’t watch every single thing and just vote with their hearts or with however the wind is blowing, and that’s why awards season often starts to feel so boring and predictable… Thank you for watching! -Ev
Hey Guys, I completely agree with your take on Maestro and I'm happy to hear that I'm not alone. Almost everyone I've spoken with loved it...
I love those Emmy’s on your background! Where did you get those? Is it a regional Emmy or like a well done replica?
Thank you! Even better: they are replicas of regional Emmys.
@@TheBluffCouncil awesome! Could you tell me where you got it?
@@TheROEHD Both of us have been fortunate to win a handful of regional Emmys over the years. Ev has four. Keith has roughly a million.
Oppenheimer will clean up but I think Killers may get best film and best actress and Hold overs best actor for Giamatti, best supporting R Downey Jr. was brilliant. As a side note I agree this year is a good year for nominees, last year No Bueno.
I would be pretty surprised if "Killers" wins... but not mad at all! I worry it's not going to get many, the way so many Scorsese films leave empty handed. -Ev
@@TheBluffCouncil I'm hopeful LOL
Killers isn’t winning best picture you need to win sag ensemble and producers guild to win best picture
@@eddistasio644 I'm just hopeful lol, Oppenheimer will most likely win, and probably a quite a few more.
Well last year I was wrong because I thought top gun maverick was going to win best picture but no it went to everything everywhere all at once
Giamatti wont win. Cillian has all the industry awards. Cillian WILL win.
Personally I am rooting for Bradley Cooper and Annette Bening simply for the sheer CHAOS of it all 😅 -Ev
Everyone loves Paul, that SAG voted a nom american over him. 😂 Lol, loving someone, and thinking they should get an oscar is different business in Hollywood.
I am not sure if your guys have seen most of the pre cursers but you are going to get a lot of things wrong.
But we are NEVER wrong, Tanay. It says so right in the thumbnail!
Here are my real picks (unconstrained by the "draft process" in this episode). Which ones do you think are wrong?
Picture - Oppenheimer
Director - Nolan
Actress - Gladstone
Actor - Cillian
Supp. Actress - Randolph
Supp. Actor - RDJ
Original - Anatomy of a Fall
Adapted - Barbie
Cinematography - Oppenheimer
Editing - Killers of the Flower Moon
Intl. Film - The Zone of Interest
Production Design - Poor Things
Makeup & Hairstyling - Maestro
Costume - Poor Things
Animated - The Boy and the Heron
Doc - 20 Days in Mariupol
Sound - The Zone of Interest
Visual Effects - Godzilla Minus One
Score - Oppenheimer
Song - Barbie/Billie Eilish
-Ev
Editing for sure. That’s Jennifer Lame’s to lose. It’s not a race at all. Barbie for Adapted has promise, but it’s hard to bet against the run that American Fiction has been on.
@@TheBluffCouncil editing and adapted. Sound is leaning towards Oppie but zone has a chance so thats fine. But adapted is most likely american fiction with Oppie in second.
@@TanayGupta-vd6cz Yeah, Schoonmaker is probably just wishful thinking for me, as I want "Killers" to be more awarded than it is going to be. And I just think "Barbie" will get a boost from voters who voted reactively to the "snubs." But we shall see!
@@TheBluffCouncilEditing is Oppenheimer. No doubt about it. Everything else I kind of agree with. Actress and animation are 50/50.
Spider-Verse will win
What percentage? 100% sure? 50/50? 60/40?
@@TheBluffCouncil 68.7% over Heron's 38.7%
I think it’s a travesty you made a video about who could win and you haven’t seen several films nominated. I have a full time job not related and I managed to see all the major categories. It’s sad because I would bet a lot of academy voters didn’t either and vote on what’s popular or with their unconscious bias. SMH
A TRAVESTY!? Yes, absolutely. A travesty. Though to be fair, we didn’t make a video about who we think SHOULD win, we made a video about who we think WILL win. Theoretically, one could make a pretty damn accurate list of predictions having seen NONE of the nominated films. But having seen almost every single one outside of the documentaries and “Rustin” (which I refuse to watch, did you SEE those green screen shots!?), I think we have a decent idea. But sadly, I think you’re right, and a lot of voters probably don’t watch every single thing and just vote with their hearts or with however the wind is blowing, and that’s why awards season often starts to feel so boring and predictable… Thank you for watching! -Ev
Barbie is such an overrated movie... Still dont get all the bruhaha.
Absolute crap