I got my Morph last week and I am highly disappointed because of many features fail to work out of the box ... to be honest your video doesn't reflect reality. It's a feature overview and product showcase not really impressions how bad or good things work. You skipped almost all the issues with the product. For example HDR10 missing color correction or many mister cores fail to run correctly. update: I checked their discord and it's worse than I thought: hdr10 as hlg are both broken color correction missing, scanlines banding , many mister cores bugged (aspect ratio for example), motion adaptive deinterlacing is broken, and the list goes on and on. I can tell people are not happy including myself.
I mentioned the HDR10 issue and i showcased how HLG HDR worked fine. I haven't had any issues with mister fpga itself. The only issue I've heard about is when using direct video some of the cores info lack the Metadata for their positioning. So cores like NES/SNES can position off screen and you need to shift them over. I don't think it's a big deal, and profiles are being set up per core using direct video. Until then don't use direct video, have the mister output 1080p and let the Morph take it to 4k. Not sure what your reality is, but the Morph 4k has been doing well in my setup. I've been using it daily and am finding it to be a pretty solid product. If you need assistance you might want to check the PixelFX discord, they've been very helpful in any bumps I've run into.
Have you updated the firmware? It's very easy once you have the wifi set up. Many of the problems I had with launch firmware were addressed. Pixel FX still has a bit to go to catch up to RT4K, but they are making strides and communicating frequently on the pixel FX discord.
@@BahnYukiDude, I checked their discord and it's worse than I thought: hdr10 as hlg are both broken color correction missing, scanlines banding , many mister cores bugged (aspect ratio for example), motion adaptive deinterlacing is broken, and the list goes on and on. I can tell people are not happy including myself.
@@takeyourtime3328 Deinterlacing issues were a regression and were fixed and improved a few days back. Right now the only scaler that even attempts colour correction for HDR is the Tink4k so Morph's HDR is at the least on par with everything else. I don't think Mister core issues are PixelFX's fault.
This is a beautiful off-screen showcase of the scaler, just bought mine after the price drop. :)
I wonder how this compares to the Retrotink 4K.
@@AFreakinProblem very similar these days
Can you some different consoles, so far on youtube, your video seems the most sensible I've watched and it's pushing me to purchase one
I made two more videos on PC. Morph is looking pretty good
@@BahnYuki your earlier videos from a few years ago with the Saturn made me buy the ossc, and I would love to see one with the morph and the Saturn
@@MarkO-ul5hv that's a great idea. I have a retrotink classic i can use to digitize the 240p component output. Then feed that into the morph for 4k
.. Sube ese el Link de ese juego de . Xbox clásico. en super ultra full HDMI 8k Plus .. Con el nuevo adaptador ya antes mencionado ..
i got a $36 scanline generator from amazon that looks about same as this one
Link please. I have other TVs that could benefit
I got my Morph last week and I am highly disappointed because of many features fail to work out of the box ... to be honest your video doesn't reflect reality. It's a feature overview and product showcase not really impressions how bad or good things work. You skipped almost all the issues with the product. For example HDR10 missing color correction or many mister cores fail to run correctly. update: I checked their discord and it's worse than I thought: hdr10 as hlg are both broken color correction missing, scanlines banding , many mister cores bugged (aspect ratio for example), motion adaptive deinterlacing is broken, and the list goes on and on. I can tell people are not happy including myself.
I mentioned the HDR10 issue and i showcased how HLG HDR worked fine. I haven't had any issues with mister fpga itself. The only issue I've heard about is when using direct video some of the cores info lack the Metadata for their positioning. So cores like NES/SNES can position off screen and you need to shift them over. I don't think it's a big deal, and profiles are being set up per core using direct video. Until then don't use direct video, have the mister output 1080p and let the Morph take it to 4k.
Not sure what your reality is, but the Morph 4k has been doing well in my setup. I've been using it daily and am finding it to be a pretty solid product. If you need assistance you might want to check the PixelFX discord, they've been very helpful in any bumps I've run into.
Never saw people so upset that a 4K upscaler upscales to 4K!
Have you updated the firmware? It's very easy once you have the wifi set up. Many of the problems I had with launch firmware were addressed. Pixel FX still has a bit to go to catch up to RT4K, but they are making strides and communicating frequently on the pixel FX discord.
@@BahnYukiDude, I checked their discord and it's worse than I thought: hdr10 as hlg are both broken color correction missing, scanlines banding , many mister cores bugged (aspect ratio for example), motion adaptive deinterlacing is broken, and the list goes on and on. I can tell people are not happy including myself.
@@takeyourtime3328 Deinterlacing issues were a regression and were fixed and improved a few days back. Right now the only scaler that even attempts colour correction for HDR is the Tink4k so Morph's HDR is at the least on par with everything else. I don't think Mister core issues are PixelFX's fault.