It is the greatest lens for Sony APS-C, absolutely no doubt! I've been using it for more than four years now and it actually gets better every day! I'd say it isn't for beginners due to the focal length, but once one has moved beyond the beginner level, this is the lens to get and to be challenged by!
100% agree about this being the best lens for Sony apps-c. I’d love to see more of your excellent street photography videos, but specially with this lens (and maybe a 6700 in the future?!).
Ive recently picked up a used a6400 with kit lens, Im looking to pick up a lens and wondering if i go for the 56mm or the 18-50mm as a new photographer feels abit overwhelming picking.
Love this video, thank you, what creative style do you use? I want to do more Black and White photography but I am not sure whether to change the style in the camera or turn them into B&W in post in lightroom.
Bit off topic but what export settings do you use for Instagram ? Still the ones from the old Video ? Ps: i have that lens / camera Combo aswell and i absolutely loved it but upgrading to an a7IV theres just no going back this thing is on another level
to which lens with stabilization would you compare this lens to? Any recommendations for stabilzed lenses (zoom and prime) for the a6400 you think are must-haves? (preferably weather-sealed because I'd use it to travel around and mainly I don't trust myself)
There is no comparable lens with OSS for Sony APS-C. Closest would probably be the Sony 50mm f1.8 OSS APS-C lens, but it is not on the same level in terms of image quality and style. Just get the Sigma 56mm f1.4, no matter if you have IBIS or not. With f1.4 you don't need OSS/ IBIS neccessarily.
Do u think this lens is good for cooking videos? I am a beginner and super unhappy with the lens I am using now E 50 mm F1.8 OSS APS-C Standard. It makes this terrible sound when on AF C and it s terrible for ASMR videos. Thanks in advance!
Sigma 65mm f2 only makes sense if you are planning to switch to full-frame (or use it in parallel on APS-C and FF). If you only have the A6700 then the 56mm f1.4 makes much more sense. Smaller, less expensive and f1.4.
Two lenses I recommend to anyone now with ASP-C camera is the Sigma 18-50 F2.8 and Sigma 56mm F1.4, One brilliant zoom lens and one brilliant Prime which will do nicely for most shooting scenarios, hope that helps :)
I bought the Sigma 56mm a few months before I bought the Sigma 18-50, which I use as a travel lens. Personally I find it hard to justify owning both lenses as the 18-50 is already a top notch lens with few compromises and lots of quality.
can you confirm if shots taken with a Sigma 56mm on a Sony A6400 would give similar or the same FOV as shots taken on a Sony full frame body with a Sigma 85mm f1.4?
Hi Curtis and the rest of you guys! I'm new to photography and just picked up an A6400.. I was wondering would would be classed as the best everyday lens? Purpose for the camera is pictures of my newborn, celebrations like birthdays/weddings & holiday photos. Can anyone assist please?
Yes, no, maybe haha 😆 Honestly I think if you have just those two lenses you'd be able to shoot nearly anything and everything. If I was starting out in photography or needed a couple of solid lenses. I'd in most likely hood, chose these!
@@CurtisPadleyThat’s exactly what I did! Picked up the 18-50mm for the versatility and then the 56mm for the bokeh and speed to put in my A6600. Couldn’t be happier.
That’s exactly what I did and couldn’t be happier. It’s such a good combo of lenses and covers everything I need except telephoto. The 18-50mm is even really good at close up macro-style shots! The bokeh of the 56mm though… chef’s kiss.
hey do you reocmmand zve10 or a6400? I was thinking of zve10 because of videography but i also like both recording and good photography. But the problem I dont wanna face is overheating issue nor battery life being shorten. If these are not the issue I might consider the a6400 or just go for a6600 most likely a6400 due becasue its cheaper.
Hi curtis i have the sigma 16mm 1.4, i was thinking in two options. 1st sell the 16mm 1.4 and buy the 18-50 2.8 2nd keep the 16mm 1.4 and buy the 56mm 1.4 Could you give me your opinion please?
I’ve a feeling that the photos from my 6400 is lacking the color punch. However the similar shots from Nikon z50 got better colors and contrast. How can I get the nice saturation with punchy colors right away? I am a hobbyist and do not want to go into post processing. Can I set a custom picture profile for photos in 6400 Can upgrading to sigma lens fix it
@@kamitfuzo hey bro. Thanks for your response. I checked pp2 vs pp off. The major difference I saw were of skin tone. What is pp2 all about and how it differs from pp off?
I’ve been asking myself the same question and went with the Sigma 56 mm f1.4. Therefore completing the Sigma trio. I have to say, that I don’t regret buying any of these three sigma lenses. They are absolutely amazing, with the 56 mm being my favourite lens so far. 😊
You need to consider what you want to shoot and how you intend to shoot it. Knowing that, then which lens to get isn't even a question. We don't know that info, so any answer you get here is just someone describing their own needs to you.
If price is not a problem, DO IT! But if the budget is tight, go for the Sigma 30 mm 1.4 , it gives you similar results and way more versatile, but for sure the 56 is the BEST lens out of the sigma trio!
First lens If you have the budget absolutely! But I'd recommend the sigma 18-50 as a first lens. It's such a versatile Zoom Lens, but that's me personally. Depends on what you need from a lens. But if have the sigma 18-50 and Sigma 56mm you'll be set! 📸
@@Colin.Ngai. Def… the kit lens cost around 100 usd when you get it w/ the body and you can easily get a Sigma 30mm for 200 usd , GREAT starter, once you are able to get another lens, go for the sigma zoom 18-50 that goes for around 450 usd, and you’ll be set for a goooood time. Good luck on your journey m8!
if i only have a budget to buy either sigma 18-50mm f2.8 or sigma 56mm f1.4 , which one do i have to pick ? i have a 6400 + kit lens. Therefore i tend to pick the 56mm, but i kinda want the 18-50mm aswell, anyone please help me to steel my mind please...
Forget about the 18-50. If you want a zoom, get the tamron 17-70 . It's a more versatile, better performing, fully featured lens. Get the sigma 56mm, though. Whichever one you prefer first.
@@4lakesoutdoor people say it's a crop sensor and it's not good for photography that's why these type of lenses are not good for this camera it's just a beginner camera not a professional one
@@4lakesoutdoor You do photography with Zve10 or videos cuz I just bought the camera and everyone is criticizing and saying you should've bought the A6400 ? Idk why everyone's saying that 🤔
@@muzammilrasheed2798 That's nonsense. There are many videos on the web that show how good the ZV-E10 is. Yes, you can also vlog well with it. But I use it exclusively for photography and I decided not only against the 6400, but also against the 6600, which by the way also have a crop sensor like the new 6700. Don't be impressed by the chatter and learn to take good photos with it. Just look at what Curtis shoots here for great pictures and the ZV-E10 can do even a little bit better.
Do you recommend this for outdoor portraits . Struggling with my Sony A 6400 (was use to a Canon). Want to photography child with animal and great bokeh .
Sounds like a great lens but saying that I think the Sigma is overall the better lens mainly due to the fact it has Autofocus. I have tried manual focusing lenses before, including vintage lenses and a lot of them have a unique look. But for a majority of people paying good money for a lens AF is a must.
@CurtisPadley For the image quality, it definitely is. Voigtlander is basically Carl Zeiss, it's all metal. Do you shoot manual sometimes? If so, please try it out! I've never seen anyone using Voigtlander on a Sony, and I think that would make an interesting video. Cheers!
So, I’m thinking about the Viltrox and also the Sigma 65 (although I know this video is the Sigma 56).. I don’t want to go to a full 85. I’ve got a 16-55 Sony and I want just one more prime lens with a higher zoom but under 85….
My problem with Sigma, that holds them back from being great is their stupid fascination with tiny lenses. For one, these tiny lenses end up just looking cheap and unprofessional. Especially combines with a compact apsc. It looks like you're shooting with a toy, and hurts the ergonomics and grip. Secondly, it's just pointless. There's no reason to make the lens this small at the detriment of everything else. Throw an aperature ring on there, a focus hold button, a declicker, af/mf button. Throw in OSS, make a bigger filter thread. These little lenses are like that weird tiny cellphone fad, that thankfully died out. I'm not saying the lens is BAD. It's just a disappointment. It could have been so much better if they didn't kill it's potential by making it look like a cute little toy. I mean, look at something like the Tamron 17-70. Now THAT'S a lens. People talk about sigma coming in so small, but I see that size as a negative. They are much smaller because other manufacturers aren't wasting their time doing that, and instead trying to make just regular good lenses.
It is the greatest lens for Sony APS-C, absolutely no doubt! I've been using it for more than four years now and it actually gets better every day! I'd say it isn't for beginners due to the focal length, but once one has moved beyond the beginner level, this is the lens to get and to be challenged by!
100% agree about this being the best lens for Sony apps-c.
I’d love to see more of your excellent street photography videos, but specially with this lens (and maybe a 6700 in the future?!).
Got a pov with this lens coming soon! And hope to test out the A6700 soon as possible! 🤙
@@CurtisPadley I’m looking forward to it!
Just got mine today, can’t wait to use that crisp f1.4 aperture!!
This is the lens I have the most emotional attachment to even though it's the least versatile lens I have.
Can see why dude! I agree not as versatile as some other lenses, but we can't deny how good it is, like the it gives our photos is 10/10 😀
100% the same here.
Is the sigma 56 is same as 85mm
@@paulby88ableequivalent: yes
infact: no (bokeh, dof, transfer of layers.....)
quality of images: depend on what 85mm lens you wanna to compare with
Ive recently picked up a used a6400 with kit lens, Im looking to pick up a lens and wondering if i go for the 56mm or the 18-50mm as a new photographer feels abit overwhelming picking.
What did you end up getting?
18-50 for everyday shooting.
56mm for portraits.
You should get both.
Tamron 17-70
Love this video, thank you, what creative style do you use? I want to do more Black and White photography but I am not sure whether to change the style in the camera or turn them into B&W in post in lightroom.
This lens is beautiful and my favourite of all apsc. I wish sigma made a 23mm 1.4
I've just seen they do have a new 23mm 1.4 released a few months ago. A bit pricey but these are the only 2 prime's that I would get if starting again
Love the sigma 1.4 trio lenses
So i bought the 30mm and now am looking for the 56mm because im in love with the sigma quality.
My Sigma 30 f1.4 is my most used lens on my a6300
I'm in LOVE with my Sigma 56mm. Absolutely excellent for photography. If it had OSS, I'd be using it for video too.
How would you compare this to the sigma 30mm 1.4?
just bought one, thanks for your share. What kind of filter will be better? Kase or Nisi?
I enjoy your sample photos very much. Almost makes me want to live in a city!
Just got mine and I love it!
Bit off topic but what export settings do you use for Instagram ? Still the ones from the old Video ? Ps: i have that lens / camera Combo aswell and i absolutely loved it but upgrading to an a7IV theres just no going back this thing is on another level
to which lens with stabilization would you compare this lens to? Any recommendations for stabilzed lenses (zoom and prime) for the a6400 you think are must-haves? (preferably weather-sealed because I'd use it to travel around and mainly I don't trust myself)
There is no comparable lens with OSS for Sony APS-C. Closest would probably be the Sony 50mm f1.8 OSS APS-C lens, but it is not on the same level in terms of image quality and style.
Just get the Sigma 56mm f1.4, no matter if you have IBIS or not. With f1.4 you don't need OSS/ IBIS neccessarily.
Does the Viltrox AF 27mm F1.2 Pro APS-C Lens For Sony E-Mount fit my sony a5100 ?
Do u think this lens is good for cooking videos? I am a beginner and super unhappy with the lens I am using now E 50 mm F1.8 OSS APS-C Standard. It makes this terrible sound when on AF C and it s terrible for ASMR videos. Thanks in advance!
Hey Curtis,
Trying to decide on this or the Sigma 65mm f2 for use on a A6700. What are your thought please?
Sigma 65mm f2 only makes sense if you are planning to switch to full-frame (or use it in parallel on APS-C and FF). If you only have the A6700 then the 56mm f1.4 makes much more sense. Smaller, less expensive and f1.4.
I just ordered this to my new a6700. Will be insane!
Ayyy that's awesome! Can't wait to test one out when I can! 🤙
@@CurtisPadleywill you be getting the new a6700 and get rid of your a6400? I have a7 III now and dreaming about a a7 IV + a6700 combo 😅
This or the Sony 35mm F1.8 OSS?
The sigma 16mm f1.4 is an awesome lens too I think you should give it a run
I bought the Sigma 18-50mm based on some of your other videos. Enough of a difference with the 56mm to consider adding as well, or is it redundant?
Two lenses I recommend to anyone now with ASP-C camera is the Sigma 18-50 F2.8 and Sigma 56mm F1.4, One brilliant zoom lens and one brilliant Prime which will do nicely for most shooting scenarios, hope that helps :)
I bought the Sigma 56mm a few months before I bought the Sigma 18-50, which I use as a travel lens. Personally I find it hard to justify owning both lenses as the 18-50 is already a top notch lens with few compromises and lots of quality.
How is this lens for landscape photography? I can't seem to find anything about it.
can you confirm if shots taken with a Sigma 56mm on a Sony A6400 would give similar or the same FOV as shots taken on a Sony full frame body with a Sigma 85mm f1.4?
Yes, it will be the same FOV
Hi Curtis and the rest of you guys! I'm new to photography and just picked up an A6400.. I was wondering would would be classed as the best everyday lens? Purpose for the camera is pictures of my newborn, celebrations like birthdays/weddings & holiday photos. Can anyone assist please?
Sigma 18-50mm F2.8
Absolutely the best lens. Bold claims but pretty accurate.
I just bought the 18-50 2.8 after watching you video, do I need this now as well. 😀😀
Yes, no, maybe haha 😆
Honestly I think if you have just those two lenses you'd be able to shoot nearly anything and everything. If I was starting out in photography or needed a couple of solid lenses. I'd in most likely hood, chose these!
I have that lens aswell and im gonna buy the sigma 1.4 56mm for low light or portrait with more bokeh. Those 2 lens are enough for my hobby
@@CurtisPadleyThat’s exactly what I did! Picked up the 18-50mm for the versatility and then the 56mm for the bokeh and speed to put in my A6600. Couldn’t be happier.
That’s exactly what I did and couldn’t be happier. It’s such a good combo of lenses and covers everything I need except telephoto. The 18-50mm is even really good at close up macro-style shots! The bokeh of the 56mm though… chef’s kiss.
I'm constantly switching between the 18-50 f2.8mm and the 56mm f1.4. They are Sigma's APS-C masterpieces!
Thank You for the information
Hey Curtis, I have the sony a6600, which lens do you recommend for vlogging except the sigma 16mm?
Good question! I'd highly recommend the Sony 10-18 F4
hey do you reocmmand zve10 or a6400? I was thinking of zve10 because of videography but i also like both recording and good photography. But the problem I dont wanna face is overheating issue nor battery life being shorten. If these are not the issue I might consider the a6400 or just go for a6600 most likely a6400 due becasue its cheaper.
What about the Viltrox 75 though?
HELP MEEE DECIDEE plss😢
ZVE10 w/ sigma 56mm 1.4 or Canon R50 rf 50mm 1.8
This may sounds like a dumb question but is this a good choice of lens for portrait photography?
It's an absolutely fantastic lens for portrait photography! 🙌
can't decide between this or the 56mm :( 56 is cheaper but 85 looks nicer
How will you compare this lens vs the Sigma 85mm?
Hi curtis i have the sigma 16mm 1.4, i was thinking in two options.
1st sell the 16mm 1.4 and buy the 18-50 2.8
2nd keep the 16mm 1.4 and buy the 56mm 1.4
Could you give me your opinion please?
Legend ❤
I’ve a feeling that the photos from my 6400 is lacking the color punch. However the similar shots from Nikon z50 got better colors and contrast. How can I get the nice saturation with punchy colors right away? I am a hobbyist and do not want to go into post processing. Can I set a custom picture profile for photos in 6400
Can upgrading to sigma lens fix it
Use PP1 image profile 😉
@@kamitfuzo hey bro. Thanks for your response. I checked pp2 vs pp off. The major difference I saw were of skin tone. What is pp2 all about and how it differs from pp off?
@@mikunjrathwa o only shot raw in pp1 and photos come off with great colors,
Should I get it if I already have 30mm f1.4?
Or should I go for 85mm f1.8 from Sony? Or Viltrox maybe..
I’ve been asking myself the same question and went with the Sigma 56 mm f1.4. Therefore completing the Sigma trio. I have to say, that I don’t regret buying any of these three sigma lenses. They are absolutely amazing, with the 56 mm being my favourite lens so far. 😊
You need to consider what you want to shoot and how you intend to shoot it. Knowing that, then which lens to get isn't even a question.
We don't know that info, so any answer you get here is just someone describing their own needs to you.
@@javnine9829I have the same doubt now. Would you please recommend which one would be better for portraits?
@@vidyarthawijerathne5143 For portraits I‘d personally go for the 56 mm f1.4.
now, how about it as a first lens with a body? bc im about to buy a camera next month
If price is not a problem, DO IT!
But if the budget is tight, go for the Sigma 30 mm 1.4 , it gives you similar results and way more versatile, but for sure the 56 is the BEST lens out of the sigma trio!
This and 18-135 kit lens is all you need
First lens If you have the budget absolutely! But I'd recommend the sigma 18-50 as a first lens. It's such a versatile Zoom Lens, but that's me personally. Depends on what you need from a lens.
But if have the sigma 18-50 and Sigma 56mm you'll be set! 📸
@@angelmarinelarena3342do you think ill be fine if i skip the kit lens and go for the 30mm? I def dont have the budget for both
@@Colin.Ngai. Def… the kit lens cost around 100 usd when you get it w/ the body and you can easily get a Sigma 30mm for 200 usd , GREAT starter, once you are able to get another lens, go for the sigma zoom 18-50 that goes for around 450 usd, and you’ll be set for a goooood time.
Good luck on your journey m8!
How is shooting with this lens with no ibis in camera or lens??
I use Nikon z6 ii. Should i get this lens or not?
No, Z6 II is a Fullframe camera. This is designed for APS-C
Looks like a belting lens great review
Ayyy thanks Matt! Always great to hear! 🤙
Does anyone know what CPL goes best with this lens? Preferably for use on automotive photography.
will it work with sony alpha 6400?
Yes. I have the Sony a6400 and the Sigma 56mm f/1.4.
Curtis, can I vlog with this lens? It makes my face look much better than when I’m using the 16mm
if i only have a budget to buy either sigma 18-50mm f2.8 or sigma 56mm f1.4 , which one do i have to pick ? i have a 6400 + kit lens. Therefore i tend to pick the 56mm, but i kinda want the 18-50mm aswell, anyone please help me to steel my mind please...
Forget about the 18-50. If you want a zoom, get the tamron 17-70 . It's a more versatile, better performing, fully featured lens. Get the sigma 56mm, though. Whichever one you prefer first.
just wondering, what cpl filter would you want for this lens?
Is this lens good for Alpha a7ii
Sigma 56 vs sony 50mm 1.8 fe ??
This seems like a quailty lens! 😋
Someone please tell me what those red things i see hanging on cameras on the side
Whats a good SD card for the a6400 ?
sandisk extreme pro
How it can be ekvivalent when its between apsc lenses on sigma site?
Help me, i'm lost 🥲
Can I use this Lens on my Sony Zve10 as a prime lens please tell ??
Why not? I use exact this combo.
@@4lakesoutdoor people say it's a crop sensor and it's not good for photography that's why these type of lenses are not good for this camera it's just a beginner camera not a professional one
@@muzammilrasheed2798 Well, at least I earn money with it. But of course you can also buy a Hasselblad, then you are on the safe side😉
@@4lakesoutdoor You do photography with Zve10 or videos cuz I just bought the camera and everyone is criticizing and saying you should've bought the A6400 ? Idk why everyone's saying that 🤔
@@muzammilrasheed2798 That's nonsense. There are many videos on the web that show how good the ZV-E10 is. Yes, you can also vlog well with it. But I use it exclusively for photography and I decided not only against the 6400, but also against the 6600, which by the way also have a crop sensor like the new 6700. Don't be impressed by the chatter and learn to take good photos with it. Just look at what Curtis shoots here for great pictures and the ZV-E10 can do even a little bit better.
Do you recommend this for outdoor portraits . Struggling with my Sony A 6400 (was use to a Canon). Want to photography child with animal and great bokeh .
My favourite lens also
I believe that the Voigtlander 56mm 1.4 SL ll is better but it's just manual unfortunately.
Sounds like a great lens but saying that I think the Sigma is overall the better lens mainly due to the fact it has Autofocus. I have tried manual focusing lenses before, including vintage lenses and a lot of them have a unique look. But for a majority of people paying good money for a lens AF is a must.
@CurtisPadley For the image quality, it definitely is. Voigtlander is basically Carl Zeiss, it's all metal. Do you shoot manual sometimes? If so, please try it out! I've never seen anyone using Voigtlander on a Sony, and I think that would make an interesting video. Cheers!
@@robertanastase558I use Voigtländer on two Sonys. Fantastic lenses.
Man 85 is my team teammate!
i think comparing this Sigma to the Tamron, i think Sigma will obviously produce better image quality with better sharpness and bokeh
Was my favorite' till I tried the Viltrox 75 1.2
So, I’m thinking about the Viltrox and also the Sigma 65 (although I know this video is the Sigma 56).. I don’t want to go to a full 85. I’ve got a 16-55 Sony and I want just one more prime lens with a higher zoom but under 85….
My budget is for viltrox 56mm :(
I also like the Viltrox 56, Its much cheaper hhhh
My problem with Sigma, that holds them back from being great is their stupid fascination with tiny lenses. For one, these tiny lenses end up just looking cheap and unprofessional. Especially combines with a compact apsc. It looks like you're shooting with a toy, and hurts the ergonomics and grip. Secondly, it's just pointless. There's no reason to make the lens this small at the detriment of everything else. Throw an aperature ring on there, a focus hold button, a declicker, af/mf button. Throw in OSS, make a bigger filter thread. These little lenses are like that weird tiny cellphone fad, that thankfully died out.
I'm not saying the lens is BAD. It's just a disappointment. It could have been so much better if they didn't kill it's potential by making it look like a cute little toy. I mean, look at something like the Tamron 17-70. Now THAT'S a lens. People talk about sigma coming in so small, but I see that size as a negative. They are much smaller because other manufacturers aren't wasting their time doing that, and instead trying to make just regular good lenses.
💜👍💜👍
Insllah day one day me Sony camera 😢
I decide to exchange my zve10 for a6700, I think its worth
That's a huge upgrade! Nice 🤙
Me too, can’t wait for it to arrive!
1:01 Fast? This lens is not fast. The Sony SEL-35F18 is fast but the sigma prime lenses with 1.4 are very slow.
Do you know what 'fast' means? It refers to the widest aperture. An f1.4 lens is faster than f1.8.
Will you be doing a6700 test?
I will be as soon as I can get my hands on one. 😀
just bought one, thanks for your share. What kind of filter will be better? Kase or Nisi?