2:59 as per this chart i am understanding like , use DPM++ at first step then at second Ksampler use to enhance or not but when scaling you must use eular only !!
When I first started using SD I was very disapointed since DALL-E did generate better images, but now that I've been using it for a couple of weeks, and really start to understand AAALLLL the details and settings, it's just crazy what it can do! These detailed analytical video's really help with that, thank you!
Until now I've been pushing Euler to 30 because I didn't know it was getting decent results as low as 9. Very useful information, especially if you have a slow computer like me. You have a good logical approach. Thank you very much 🙂👍
Thanks for your feedback. I only use 9 or 12 for a quick scan. For higher quality I usually go to 24, or more, but past 40 there is almost no visible gain anymore.
@@rudyshobbychannel I mainly work in 16:9, 960x544 portrait or panorama, then double the size with ControlNet-Tile to 1920x1088, so this kind of information is useful for me, because I can't experiment much myself due to a slow computer. I intend to buy an rtx 3060 12Gb, I think it will be enough for average speed. Thanks again for your analysis. 🙂
I don't have DPM++_2M Karras in ComfyUI. What I do have is DPM++_2M and Karras as a scheduler... but I also have Karras with Euler so not sure if it's the same thing
Ive started to use txt2 img from a free online service and have just instaled a1111 on my computer and i found out that dms's samplers give a more crisp img, and the 2m follows the prompt better (butt sometimes it gives some anormalities), while other methods are more "creative". I will give a try to euler as the finder, but i liked more the dpm++ karras as the better one as it gives a crisp image, natural details and follows complex prompts very well, and its also fast to create and to get to a stable img.
Thank you so much for putting in the work on this. Most sources I've read on which sampler to use say, "it depends", but never really explain why or how it depends.
Excellent and efficient workflow...! Thank You Ruud for this series...! Looking forward to get my own SD / GPU / PC...! Will rewatch all, when I get a machine. Have tested, found And been using models, just like this, on Playgroundai... Euler Ancestral for variations, changing steps, and ddim for uniformity...Learned AI Converge today...! Greetinngs.
I have gtx1650 with 4gb vram, and I usually let run my computer for hours 😂 It needs about 2-3 minutes to generate two 512*768 picture in good enough quality, but I using easy diffusion, so I can leave when i set up the batch work.
Yes, after the Swiss mathematician and physicist,astronomer, geographer, logician and engineer Leonhard Euler. I am guessing Rudy did not study any of those things, or he would have known and/or recognized the name. 😂
2:59 as per this chart i am understanding like , use DPM++ at first step then at second Ksampler use to enhance or not but when scaling you must use eular only !!
When I first started using SD I was very disapointed since DALL-E did generate better images, but now that I've been using it for a couple of weeks, and really start to understand AAALLLL the details and settings, it's just crazy what it can do! These detailed analytical video's really help with that, thank you!
you're welcome.
Until now I've been pushing Euler to 30 because I didn't know it was getting decent results as low as 9. Very useful information, especially if you have a slow computer like me. You have a good logical approach. Thank you very much 🙂👍
Thanks for your feedback. I only use 9 or 12 for a quick scan. For higher quality I usually go to 24, or more, but past 40 there is almost no visible gain anymore.
@@rudyshobbychannel I mainly work in 16:9, 960x544 portrait or panorama, then double the size with ControlNet-Tile to 1920x1088, so this kind of information is useful for me, because I can't experiment much myself due to a slow computer. I intend to buy an rtx 3060 12Gb, I think it will be enough for average speed. Thanks again for your analysis. 🙂
Damn! Thank you for every hour you put into this!!
I don't have DPM++_2M Karras in ComfyUI. What I do have is DPM++_2M and Karras as a scheduler... but I also have Karras with Euler so not sure if it's the same thing
Ive started to use txt2 img from a free online service and have just instaled a1111 on my computer and i found out that dms's samplers give a more crisp img, and the 2m follows the prompt better (butt sometimes it gives some anormalities), while other methods are more "creative".
I will give a try to euler as the finder, but i liked more the dpm++ karras as the better one as it gives a crisp image, natural details and follows complex prompts very well, and its also fast to create and to get to a stable img.
Thank you so much for putting in the work on this. Most sources I've read on which sampler to use say, "it depends", but never really explain why or how it depends.
What a beautiful and detailed explanation, thanks a lot
Great video! Is there a way to get a copy of this worksheet? Thanks!
Yes, this the link to my Sampler Comparison GDrive folder:
drive.google.com/drive/folders/1ZDYL-T9ZErTUuA6RdCHBz26LFkHTzFZb?usp=sharing
Thank you!@@rudyshobbychannel
Fantastic explanation! I am less confused about this than I was prior to watching!
Thx for your feedback, it's appreciated.
It's a very useful test and save me a lot of time in future. Thanks
this video is the gold i was looking for. thank you multiple times :D
You're welcome!
Hi! thanks for the video, it was very interesting and helpful. could you share the spreadsheet you showed?...hope I'm not being too tactless 😄
I placed a copy in the GDrive folder with workflows:
drive.google.com/drive/folders/1C4hnb__HQB2Pkig9pH7NWxQ05LJYBd7D
Thanks, Rudy, you're a big help
Thank you for this great tutorial, it helps me a lot. I was so confused by all these sampling methods 😅
Thank you very much for your detailed breakdown of your experience with samplers!
Thanks for your feedback, it's appreciated.
Interesting and clear info. Thanks
Thank you for the explanation!
Good job and thanks for that 👌
Excellent and efficient workflow...! Thank You Ruud for this series...!
Looking forward to get my own SD / GPU / PC...! Will rewatch all, when I get a machine.
Have tested, found And been using models, just like this, on Playgroundai...
Euler Ancestral for variations, changing steps, and ddim for uniformity...Learned AI Converge today...!
Greetinngs.
Thx for the feedback. Get yourself a good one, luckily video card prices normalized some.
I have a 3070 myself and with ComfyUI the speed is OK.
I have gtx1650 with 4gb vram, and I usually let run my computer for hours 😂
It needs about 2-3 minutes to generate two 512*768 picture in good enough quality, but I using easy diffusion, so I can leave when i set up the batch work.
simple to follow and very useful!
Good explaination
Spectacular video!
Thanks for the feedback, glad you enjoyed it.
Hola, justo andaba buscando un análisis como este! muchas gracias compañero! :D
You're welcome!
Hey thank you so much, your explanation was so detailed and really enjoyed the video!
Very helpful video. Just FYI, Euler is pronounced "oiler" not "yooler." Thanks for putting this together.
Yes, after the Swiss mathematician and physicist,astronomer, geographer, logician and engineer Leonhard Euler. I am guessing Rudy did not study any of those things, or he would have known and/or recognized the name. 😂
Well, I have studied and I've known 'oiler' since I was 16 years old ... it's just that I'm Dutch, and we call him Euler. :)
Great video. very helpful
This is off topic, but I had to laugh out loud at "girl, age 30", haha!
Thanks.
You're welcome
thankyou
👍🏻
Why are you talking like Captain Kirk?
great video! thanks