I wanted to ask what option you have for AI attack. Because it looks like you have nearest lord option. If it is true then battles are pretty predictable once 1st lord is eliminated. Like in 2 vs 2 vs 2 vs 2 on balanced map. First team dies. then opposite diagonal team dies since for remaining teams they are the closest. And then happens final 1vs 1 between teams. Also in 4 vs 4 the battles on balanced map are always 4 seperated 1 vs 1 between closest lords until one dies then there is 2 vs 1 where 2 lords attack next closest lord. I remember 3 wolfs with weakest castle against 3 saladins with strongest castles. Now that was epic since lords attacked one another criss cross. Not just the closest ones. Thanks for the great content. :)
Eh, these battles aren't always so predictable. There was one 2v2v2v2 on this channel where Wolf lost his ally early on and then just braved attacks from three lords until the game turned into 1v2, with him against Frederick and Richard. And then the gray bastard actually won.
1. Wolf Under-performed. Again. That isn't his worst castle, but, meh. 2. Good to see that Lionheart didn't bug out again. As I said in the last version of this match, that team would've won if he didn't bug, to which they did pull off a win. 3. Saladins definitely put up a better fight than the Emirs. 4. Saladins vs Everybody, lmao. 5. Gold reserves ran out quick by the 11 minute mark, much to my surprise. 6. Sultan basically AFKs when gold reserves run out. 7. Both Lionhearts attacked in near-perfect sync. As someone already said, I do think this map is more akin to a 5 v 3 match, given the layout. It could be interesting to see that be done.
![80. The Big One! - Stronghold Crusader HD Trail [75 SPEED NO PAUSE]](/img/n.gif)
I wanted to ask what option you have for AI attack. Because it looks like you have nearest lord option. If it is true then battles are pretty predictable once 1st lord is eliminated. Like in 2 vs 2 vs 2 vs 2 on balanced map. First team dies. then opposite diagonal team dies since for remaining teams they are the closest. And then happens final 1vs 1 between teams. Also in 4 vs 4 the battles on balanced map are always 4 seperated 1 vs 1 between closest lords until one dies then there is 2 vs 1 where 2 lords attack next closest lord. I remember 3 wolfs with weakest castle against 3 saladins with strongest castles. Now that was epic since lords attacked one another criss cross. Not just the closest ones. Thanks for the great content. :)
Eh, these battles aren't always so predictable. There was one 2v2v2v2 on this channel where Wolf lost his ally early on and then just braved attacks from three lords until the game turned into 1v2, with him against Frederick and Richard. And then the gray bastard actually won.
@@aminadabbrulle8252 well i agree that sometimes. But most of the time it is predictable. And wolf is realy strong lord
1. Wolf Under-performed. Again. That isn't his worst castle, but, meh.
2. Good to see that Lionheart didn't bug out again. As I said in the last version of this match, that team would've won if he didn't bug, to which they did pull off a win.
3. Saladins definitely put up a better fight than the Emirs.
4. Saladins vs Everybody, lmao.
5. Gold reserves ran out quick by the 11 minute mark, much to my surprise.
6. Sultan basically AFKs when gold reserves run out.
7. Both Lionhearts attacked in near-perfect sync.
As someone already said, I do think this map is more akin to a 5 v 3 match, given the layout. It could be interesting to see that be done.
good map :)
2 saladins vs everybody
saladin vs 3 pigs
I just mentioned what this Video was about
this map for 5 vs 3, not suitable for different parts totally unbalace
Change saladins with wolfs and insted of wolf use emir, or saladin
lol that light blue caliph dead was so cheap :D
You gave no resources to wolf, stone queries were in front of wolf's castle, targeted by lionheart, very unbalanced game.
Yes! Please balance the resources!