I have both. When SI first came on line the bug report was long, just like BATC is now. Sooner or later we'll be able to do an apples to apples comparison that can't really be done yet. Remember, BATC is 4 months behind.
@@AvCasey19 Not really... With the amount of flights I do monthly, assuming batc premium voices with traffic, my bill would be near 54 us/month or 650 US/year
Interesting video nice job - subbed. I just picked up BATC and lots of potential, some gremlins as expected in early release phase. Time zones mean VATSIM a no go for me…when the ‘full and final’ iteration is ready along with a multi-threaded FS24 life will be sweet.
Just so you are aware. You can click on the frequency in the SI UI to change this. There is also now an autotune feature that puts the given frequency in your standby. That way when ready you can flick over. Its an option though so you can turn this off.
A tip with Beyond ATC is if you set it to auto-tune the radio, leave auto-respond unchecked, and read back the correct radio information, the AI co-pilot will automatically switch it for you to the correct frequency. An idea I had is using Beyond ATC with Say Intentions AI but having Say Intentions multiplayer set as listen-only to be able to listen to real players using Say Intentions, hopeful to add more realism while flying.
I often fly long airliner IFR flights and absolutely love the fact that BATC has an auto respond feature that in essence acts as a co-pilot. Say Intentions does not have this feature that makes it unusable for me.
What I got out of this is if you want to pay extra to talk about ham sandwiches and aliens or take illegal flights around the Las Vegas strip at 200 feet, something you'd likely try to avoid as a pilot acting professionally you can do so for $360 per year. If you just want solid ATC with VFR and traffic coming in the future you can do so for $30 one time. I thought the SI voices we quite a bit more robotic than the BATC basic voices. I could use my $30/month to add premium voices and get more than enough flying with the 750K characters and enjoy better audio experiences compared to what SI shows here. I'm giving BATC a chance. If they stop progressing then I may have to make a different choice, but right now they've provided 8 updates in less than a week, so they are clearly making constant changes. Let's see where things are six months from now.
I bought BATC on release day, and they’re making huge progress, so we need to be realistic in our expectations. I completely agree with everything you said above. These are both wonderful projects and great, responsive dev teams, but there’s no way that I can justify SI at their current rates. I do totally appreciate that the back-end AI costs what it does, but that doesn’t change my budget.
@@peteallennh If someone has $400/year to shell out for fake people talking to you, more power to you and you've clearly made wonderful life choices, but yes for 90% of the market it's just never going to be anything more than a splurge for a month.
It's not even that. No offense to the SI team, but I have zero confidence in their approach using an LLM as the logic behind the traffic. They have no direct control over the system, and in the end it is nothing but an illusion of a functioning traffic system. That may be good enough for many cases, but BATC has an ACTUAL traffic management system running behind the scenes. They also have traffic now, or at least on the experimental branch, not sure if it has gone public yet. Ultimately I just don't trust the approach of SI.
@@Terry-7this is the realest comment ever. It’s so annoying when beyondatc wants me to taxi a lot more and also making me depart in the wrong direction. Makes my flights longer 😅
Beyond atc definitely has a lot of potential but I agree it struggles is with off script requests and situations, sadly it can't currently handle common changes like you want to change gate or want to change approach mid flight or head away from some weather. When the vast majority of situations are covered like this, I think it will have an edge over sayintentions due to the vast difference in price. Also I know that they are building a community base for the airport data and commonly used procedures and runways etc.
Thanks for the best video I have seen on this subject. I have bought and I’m using Beyond ATC, I’d agree it does run on rails, but that suits me, because basically I want to learn how to do ATC properly and it’s teaching me by making me say the right things. I really don’t want to ask it about ham sandwiches and I certainly don’t want to pay 30 bucks a month for the privilege. So I do think the price difference of the two systems is a big factor here. I am realising with Beyond ATC that, yes, essentially it has a list of things it is expecting you to say (just like real world ATC) but thanks to the AI it doesn’t really mind how you say them. So, in that sense, it feels natural. It’s also quite quick to respond, and I really like that. So, in summary, Beyond ATC is suiting me right now, I hope it evolves more, but I really don’t want to pay ten times more than I’m paying now. Keep up the good work. You’ve made a fantastic comparison.
Pilot 2 ATC with ATC chatter is and will be the better choice for at least another year. Beyond is neat, but get stuck constantly, and any unique responses you may get are overshadowed by the lack of other radio traffic.
I don’t know. I think you’re going to see BATC and SI both evolve very quickly. In fairness, I’ve not tried Pilot2ATC, but BATC has already been a game-changer for me.
@peteallennh Yeah, I'm not trying to compare them because AI is obviously going to win in the long run, but P2ATC has been updated regularly for years and years now has soo many great features and voices are easy to add. Reminds me of xplane vs. Msfs. Yeah one has all the features but just look at the other one. LOL.
Yeah idk, pilot2atc had problems where it wouldn't update the weather and you have to say everything perfectly. Still, it has more capabilities than batc, and offers some VfR support but not at the cost of SI
I have not decided on which I am going with yet although I fly mostly VFR so BeyondATC is not there yet for me however Say intentions pricing model just doesn't appeal to me for what you get over Beyond. I do not understand the criticism of BeyondATC "Being on rails" real world ATC is exactly "on rails" you are expected to transmit and respond in VERY specific ways, syntax and format and the real world ATC does the same. Personally I don't need my ATC to respond to questions about sandwiches, the moon or the water at the Bilagio fountain. I would assume it will get better, but the very long response delays with sayintentions is almost a deal breaker for me and I have seen it on every video I have watched.
I had to chuckle a bit at 4:46 with the three times "negative...". Been there, a little annoying at times 😅good to know I am not the only one who isn't well understood by beyond atc =D
SayIntentions has some REALLY impressive aspects, but there are three problems with it, some shown in this video, that caused me to go for BeyondATC even in its current unfinished state. The first is the price … I cannot justify that kind of outlay for any flight sim add-on … it is eye-wateringly expensive. (Bring it down to a level more like what Navigraph costs and then I might be able to consider it.) Second is the extreme latency … I understand they are working on that, but until the latency improves to a level similar to where BeyondATC already is, I’m not going to be interested. And the third is something this video seemingly held up as a positive: SayIntentions’ responses to weird things like sandwich offers or sightseeing destinations. I consider those kinds of responses totally unrealistic and a negative for the product - I mean, what sort of real world controller would put up with airtime being wasted like that? SayIntentions should be responding to all of that nonsense with a threat to report the pilot to the FAA or something, not carrying on inane conversations to show off the AI’s capabilities. Development time put toward supporting such interactions is time wasted as far as I’m concerned.
Response times in S.I have been improved. The subscription price has also been lowered. Remember, this is still fairly new and updates come through very regularly. A.I using chat GPT is the future for ATC in flight sims.
I don't buy either as long there is no electronic flight bag integration. It kills immersion, especially in VR. This would have been the first thing i would have implemented
Absolutely not this would have been the first thing you had implemented. You would not implement it at all, because the EFB of an aircraft were none of your business.
BeyondATC cant recognize that you are holding short of runways, especially with payware airports. It's hit or miss. They want you to roll right out onto the threshold before they recognize you are waiting to takeoff and sometimes not even then. And it can't vector you accurately to the middle marker for ILS intercept. It often sends you straight to the intercept expecting you to make a 170 degree turn onto the localizer, rather than a smooth 30 degree intercept from ten miles out. Not a big fan of BATC at this point. And it always wants you to do a visual approach when you might be wanting the ILS. And I was at KELP payware yesterday and it would not even give me an option to get an IFR clearance.
Pair for BATC, then a couple weeks later tried SI. Within two days paid a years subscription you SI. Is it worth it? I dont know….hard to say. Im an airliner simmer, so ATC comms is a fairly significant part of my flying.
So these ATCs update the sim at all with Taxi instructions or where do they get that info from? Why would one get it wrong while the other gets it correct talking to the same sim? Say intentions sounds way better with respect to the way the AI speaks. Sounds like someone speaking a sentence as opposed to reading one.
MSFS provides the data about the taxiways, they can also get it from navigraph. Sayintentions got it wrong because it's a lot more AI driven and chatbots have a tendency to just make shit up that sounds right.
Regarding SI injecting other traffic chatter...when I last tried it a couple of months ago, it seemed like the chatter was coming from anywhere in the US, not just the airspace I was flying in. Is that different now?
There’s a few different settings. I know it was using “real” chatter from other users before as well. Unless you really know the airspace well, it’s hard to differentiate the generated chatter.
Thanks for the video. It was very informative. At this juncture, I'm on the fence. because Microsoft flight simulator is just right around the corner. I'm wondering if a Sobo is going to address their ATC issues. which in turn both these products will become mute. That's the dilemma. If a sobo doesn't touch their ATC system, then of course. 3rd party products are back on the menu. What do you guys think?
BATC's price is such that you could use it untill MSFS2024 drops and if it is then redundant stop using or, if still usefull (what I suspect tbh...) carry on using it with FS24!
I don't care if god, hisself, is doing perfect ATC. I'll never pay for a subscription. I'm too new to ATC flying so I can't say anything about usage, but BATC is what I just paid for because it's a one time fee.
Yeah, some people buy the cheapest car they can and drive around thinking they made the wisest choice until the transmission begins to fail, the AC doesn’t work when the temp is over 80 and the infotainment system crashes constantly… My father always said, “you get what you pay for!” I hate when an ATC program can’t handle simple requests like a runway change… 😢 But you do you, Randall!
@@sep2345 BATC will be able to fix bugs and be correct a LOT better than a LLM chatbot, who can talk, but still horribly fail when precise logic is needed. it was a deliberate developer choice to not use a LLM. it's really nice that you can chat with it, but you dont want llm hallucinations in something like ATC
"Way to on the rails and that's the problem" Is it? I dare you to go fly a real flight and try to offer a ham sandwich to the controller. I absolutely don't see this as a problem, and I'd rather have on rails ATC rather than daydreaming ATC.
i have beyondatc and very happy with it but the only downside is it doesnt work with Xplane.. thats the only reason i was considering sayintentions however, the price is too damn expensive for me
I refuse to use any ATC that pronounces "three" as "tree". That includes the built-in MSFS ATC. I've never heard an American controller say "tree" either while personally flying in real life, or listening to ATC on UA-cam videos.
Sorry bud, it has been an FAA standard since... oh 1956, sure in the US you hear it both ways, I don't personally use it, nor do I say 'fife' :) But its a real thing and I assure you there are ATC controllers around that country that use it. Kind of silly to be hung up on it really :)
EDIT, PLOT TWIST: I wrote the crap below before trying SI. After I tried SI for 10 minutes and after they decreased their monthly sub to just 18 EUR/month, I'm completely blown away by it. I now use it more often than VATSIM. It's absolutely amazing. DISREGARD THE CRAP BELOW: There is no comparison. One is $30 per month (might as well be $3000). The other is $30 for a lifetime purchase plus a few more for the premium voices. I'm going BATC all the way. Do NOT (I repeat, do NOT) sponsor such subscription models. Stand your ground.
@@JohnVanderbeck yes, all it took was a 10 minute trial. Then I subscribed on the spot and I'm still using SI every day because it's the most awesome thing that has happened to flight sim since ZX Spectrum's Harrier Attack.
Say intentions model is vastly better than BATC. Being able to load up at any airport and look at the sectional or plates and put those frequencies in and it work is fabulous. BATC you have to look at the client to figure out what you can do. BATC more like a sim, Say Intentions more like real world.
You can enter frequencies in BATC as well. If you tune your radio in the plane it works exactly as SI. If you notice he said it was a "quality of life feature", not that it was the only way.
@@OTTNext Thanks for your perspective. Obviously with BATC being out barely a week none of us have had much of a chance to use it, just a handful of flights if that. Sorry it's not working well for you that way. I also so not manually tune the radios (a big reason for me getting BATC was to get better flying with ATC so I can perform better on something like VATSIM. SI would be far too expensive to use as a learning aid.) so that is a big difference.
OMG, so many petty haters currently out and about. LLMs are not even 'real' AI. Let it go and be happy that finally we are getting decent ATC options...
@@themorethemerrier281please explain what is real AI? I think you might have a little research to do before you make such broad (incorrect) statements…
@@sep2345 'AI' is a currently way overhyped term. These tools are so great because they make clever use of machine learning algorithms. But they are not really intelligent. They mimic intelligence and comprehension.
My old 90s chess computer also is (was) ai... and an extremely good one at that, quite unbeatable (only at chess, didn't do ATC very well to be fair...)
Beyond ATC doesn't charge credits for the standard voices, just premium voices. Considering that you're going to pay $30 one time for Beyond ATC compared to $30 per month for SayIntentions, I wouldn't say they're cutting corners, they are making a more affordable product.
@@Kadesh86 its either a yearly charge of $299 or $30a month. And its NOT credits. I can interact with the atc for as many flights as i want. Beyond is good for about 5 flights of credits outside of the limited one time charge before you need more talk-time credits. Ive used SI since week 1 (feb 2024) and its a more realistic ai that can handle extreme requests and situations that Beyond doesn't.
@@comiccrazy3 I get what you say. But, BATC costs 30$ a lifetime. You can use basic voices for free, and they are good. SI charges monthly (or yearly), of course voices are a part of that charge… just ask them why it is subscription based?
With BeyondATC, you only lose credits if you are using premium voice options which by chosing the basic voice you don't lose any credits as that is provided for free I've done serveral flights already with BeyondATC probably only used Premium voice once that was during release to see how it work been using basic voice ever since than. I do like say intentions where you can listen to other players.
Pointless exercise when one is in EA and openly states there are missing features and bugs. The flight sim community is obsessed with comparisons and pitching one product against another. It’s getting tiresome……
Only part of this video is comparing current features. The rest is about comparing their approaches which will give us a good idea of which will be a long term solution. They’re also both early access.
@@Brian.Murray that doesn’t really change my point/opinion. I wasn’t referencing any particular type of comparisons, just generally which includes features, approach etc. Both in EA probably strengthens my point and makes it even more pointless. Both are at different points in development and a moving target. There’s no way to compare apples for apples. It’s like trying to compare two houses when they’re only half built. This will end up the same as X-Plane vs MSFS, flight model vs flight model, Active Sky vs Rex etc. Toxic simmers (not referencing you) belittling each other and their choices. They’re already using the phrase “Rails” FSX flashback 🫣
Funny that you disabled comments on the worthless hit piece you tried to do on Gryder. First off, he wasn't PIC and he wasn't flying. Second, the tailwheel had nothing to do with the loss of control. If you did a little research, you would find that it was the right brake line. Might want to revise your video.
S.I have now lowered their monthly fee to $20.
Indeed! It’s a bit cheaper now.
I have both. When SI first came on line the bug report was long, just like BATC is now. Sooner or later we'll be able to do an apples to apples comparison that can't really be done yet. Remember, BATC is 4 months behind.
Yet they had a 6 month headstart
@@mattpost-kn6rk they are also infinentley cheaper, 200 dollars a year is ridiculous for say intentions.
@@AvCasey19 Not really... With the amount of flights I do monthly, assuming batc premium voices with traffic, my bill would be near 54 us/month or 650 US/year
@@mattpost-kn6rk for si correct?
@@AvCasey19 20 bucks a month for SI, 54 for BATC
Thanks Brian, best comparative analysis I’ve seen. Much appreciated!
It’s interesting to hear how easily BeyondATC understands your quick cadence compared to people with an accent.
Hey Brian, I really appreciated the comparison video... you've answered the questions I had about both packages... Thanks man!!! Helpful video 😄
Interesting video nice job - subbed. I just picked up BATC and lots of potential, some gremlins as expected in early release phase. Time zones mean VATSIM a no go for me…when the ‘full and final’ iteration is ready along with a multi-threaded FS24 life will be sweet.
Just so you are aware. You can click on the frequency in the SI UI to change this. There is also now an autotune feature that puts the given frequency in your standby. That way when ready you can flick over. Its an option though so you can turn this off.
A tip with Beyond ATC is if you set it to auto-tune the radio, leave auto-respond unchecked, and read back the correct radio information, the AI co-pilot will automatically switch it for you to the correct frequency. An idea I had is using Beyond ATC with Say Intentions AI but having Say Intentions multiplayer set as listen-only to be able to listen to real players using Say Intentions, hopeful to add more realism while flying.
That's a lot of money just to have a background noise. Just use real atc like liveATC, does the job.
I often fly long airliner IFR flights and absolutely love the fact that BATC has an auto respond feature that in essence acts as a co-pilot. Say Intentions does not have this feature that makes it unusable for me.
What I got out of this is if you want to pay extra to talk about ham sandwiches and aliens or take illegal flights around the Las Vegas strip at 200 feet, something you'd likely try to avoid as a pilot acting professionally you can do so for $360 per year. If you just want solid ATC with VFR and traffic coming in the future you can do so for $30 one time. I thought the SI voices we quite a bit more robotic than the BATC basic voices. I could use my $30/month to add premium voices and get more than enough flying with the 750K characters and enjoy better audio experiences compared to what SI shows here. I'm giving BATC a chance. If they stop progressing then I may have to make a different choice, but right now they've provided 8 updates in less than a week, so they are clearly making constant changes. Let's see where things are six months from now.
Sort of how I feel too. The price of Say Intentions is a killer and not worth the difference imho. The SI voices did not sound great in the video.
I bought BATC on release day, and they’re making huge progress, so we need to be realistic in our expectations. I completely agree with everything you said above. These are both wonderful projects and great, responsive dev teams, but there’s no way that I can justify SI at their current rates. I do totally appreciate that the back-end AI costs what it does, but that doesn’t change my budget.
@@peteallennh If someone has $400/year to shell out for fake people talking to you, more power to you and you've clearly made wonderful life choices, but yes for 90% of the market it's just never going to be anything more than a splurge for a month.
It's not even that. No offense to the SI team, but I have zero confidence in their approach using an LLM as the logic behind the traffic. They have no direct control over the system, and in the end it is nothing but an illusion of a functioning traffic system. That may be good enough for many cases, but BATC has an ACTUAL traffic management system running behind the scenes. They also have traffic now, or at least on the experimental branch, not sure if it has gone public yet.
Ultimately I just don't trust the approach of SI.
@@JohnVanderbeck Thanks for your perspective John.
BATC is missing the option for choosing another runway 😏
This is definitely feature that I hope they add soon. Its frustrating to have to alter my flight plan because BATC puts me on a different runway.
exactly
They added it
@@Arthur_Morgan-1899_no they didn’t. I have the newest version of beyondatc and I cannot change my departure runway
@@Terry-7this is the realest comment ever. It’s so annoying when beyondatc wants me to taxi a lot more and also making me depart in the wrong direction. Makes my flights longer 😅
Beyond atc definitely has a lot of potential but I agree it struggles is with off script requests and situations, sadly it can't currently handle common changes like you want to change gate or want to change approach mid flight or head away from some weather. When the vast majority of situations are covered like this, I think it will have an edge over sayintentions due to the vast difference in price. Also I know that they are building a community base for the airport data and commonly used procedures and runways etc.
Well, they fixed something, so now it's way better
Thanks for the best video I have seen on this subject. I have bought and I’m using Beyond ATC, I’d agree it does run on rails, but that suits me, because basically I want to learn how to do ATC properly and it’s teaching me by making me say the right things. I really don’t want to ask it about ham sandwiches and I certainly don’t want to pay 30 bucks a month for the privilege. So I do think the price difference of the two systems is a big factor here. I am realising with Beyond ATC that, yes, essentially it has a list of things it is expecting you to say (just like real world ATC) but thanks to the AI it doesn’t really mind how you say them. So, in that sense, it feels natural. It’s also quite quick to respond, and I really like that. So, in summary, Beyond ATC is suiting me right now, I hope it evolves more, but I really don’t want to pay ten times more than I’m paying now. Keep up the good work. You’ve made a fantastic comparison.
Pilot 2 ATC with ATC chatter is and will be the better choice for at least another year. Beyond is neat, but get stuck constantly, and any unique responses you may get are overshadowed by the lack of other radio traffic.
I don’t know. I think you’re going to see BATC and SI both evolve very quickly. In fairness, I’ve not tried Pilot2ATC, but BATC has already been a game-changer for me.
@peteallennh Yeah, I'm not trying to compare them because AI is obviously going to win in the long run, but P2ATC has been updated regularly for years and years now has soo many great features and voices are easy to add. Reminds me of xplane vs. Msfs. Yeah one has all the features but just look at the other one. LOL.
Yeah idk, pilot2atc had problems where it wouldn't update the weather and you have to say everything perfectly. Still, it has more capabilities than batc, and offers some VfR support but not at the cost of SI
I have not decided on which I am going with yet although I fly mostly VFR so BeyondATC is not there yet for me however Say intentions pricing model just doesn't appeal to me for what you get over Beyond.
I do not understand the criticism of BeyondATC "Being on rails" real world ATC is exactly "on rails" you are expected to transmit and respond in VERY specific ways, syntax and format and the real world ATC does the same. Personally I don't need my ATC to respond to questions about sandwiches, the moon or the water at the Bilagio fountain.
I would assume it will get better, but the very long response delays with sayintentions is almost a deal breaker for me and I have seen it on every video I have watched.
Great video here Brian!
I had to chuckle a bit at 4:46 with the three times "negative...". Been there, a little annoying at times 😅good to know I am not the only one who isn't well understood by beyond atc =D
It was awesome that say intentions just lowered the price
SayIntentions has some REALLY impressive aspects, but there are three problems with it, some shown in this video, that caused me to go for BeyondATC even in its current unfinished state. The first is the price … I cannot justify that kind of outlay for any flight sim add-on … it is eye-wateringly expensive. (Bring it down to a level more like what Navigraph costs and then I might be able to consider it.) Second is the extreme latency … I understand they are working on that, but until the latency improves to a level similar to where BeyondATC already is, I’m not going to be interested. And the third is something this video seemingly held up as a positive: SayIntentions’ responses to weird things like sandwich offers or sightseeing destinations. I consider those kinds of responses totally unrealistic and a negative for the product - I mean, what sort of real world controller would put up with airtime being wasted like that? SayIntentions should be responding to all of that nonsense with a threat to report the pilot to the FAA or something, not carrying on inane conversations to show off the AI’s capabilities. Development time put toward supporting such interactions is time wasted as far as I’m concerned.
Nailed it!
If it’s caused by tour you can turn it off
Response times in S.I have been improved. The subscription price has also been lowered.
Remember, this is still fairly new and updates come through very regularly.
A.I using chat GPT is the future for ATC in flight sims.
I do agee sayintentiom needs a better pricing model
Say Intentions is excellent but really expensive!!
I have both. Sayintentions is far ahead as far as development goes. No update on Beyond ATC in quite a while.
Are you nuts? BATC is constantly updating. And even now Traffic is days away...
You living under a rock? BATC is updated 24/7, literally, updates coming out so often. We even have full traffic injection now. hahaha
BeyondATC is what I love.
IRL, when you’re flying, do you see a dialog box pop in your field of vision, where you can use your index finger to select an option?
No, but in real life, are you flying with a DELL computer and monitor in front of you requiring input?
this is not real life dude maybe you didnt notice,its a sim
It was assumed that BeyondATC's responses are AI driven which it's not.
TBF i prefer BATC on-rails rather then the slow SI response
You said you were checking out New York but it knew you were in Las Vegas.
sadly, 30 dollars a month is waaaay to expensive for my country where the wages are low
It's also too much in my country where the wages are high(ish) :D I guess that's due to my wages specifically not being high? :D
I don't buy either as long there is no electronic flight bag integration. It kills immersion, especially in VR. This would have been the first thing i would have implemented
Absolutely not this would have been the first thing you had implemented. You would not implement it at all, because the EFB of an aircraft were none of your business.
BeyondATC cant recognize that you are holding short of runways, especially with payware airports. It's hit or miss. They want you to roll right out onto the threshold before they recognize you are waiting to takeoff and sometimes not even then. And it can't vector you accurately to the middle marker for ILS intercept. It often sends you straight to the intercept expecting you to make a 170 degree turn onto the localizer, rather than a smooth 30 degree intercept from ten miles out. Not a big fan of BATC at this point. And it always wants you to do a visual approach when you might be wanting the ILS. And I was at KELP payware yesterday and it would not even give me an option to get an IFR clearance.
Pair for BATC, then a couple weeks later tried SI. Within two days paid a years subscription you SI. Is it worth it? I dont know….hard to say. Im an airliner simmer, so ATC comms is a fairly significant part of my flying.
….and it’s great that S.I has lowered the price.
So these ATCs update the sim at all with Taxi instructions or where do they get that info from? Why would one get it wrong while the other gets it correct talking to the same sim? Say intentions sounds way better with respect to the way the AI speaks. Sounds like someone speaking a sentence as opposed to reading one.
MSFS provides the data about the taxiways, they can also get it from navigraph. Sayintentions got it wrong because it's a lot more AI driven and chatbots have a tendency to just make shit up that sounds right.
So do both say intentions and beyondATC have different languages that ATC speak? I couldnt find any information regarding that.
that SI ATC sounds pissed off, lol. Did they give you a number ?
I can’t even request flight level change on my Beyond atc. Bare in might its assigned me to fly fl170 on IFR
I wonder if the local LLMs that may be used with BATC can use the new NPU cores that the new Intel processors are coming with.
Batc doesnt use an llm
So if you had to choose best arc for your personal then which one you choose?
Regarding SI injecting other traffic chatter...when I last tried it a couple of months ago, it seemed like the chatter was coming from anywhere in the US, not just the airspace I was flying in. Is that different now?
There’s a few different settings. I know it was using “real” chatter from other users before as well. Unless you really know the airspace well, it’s hard to differentiate the generated chatter.
Thanks for the video. It was very informative. At this juncture, I'm on the fence. because Microsoft flight simulator is just right around the corner. I'm wondering if a Sobo is going to address their ATC issues. which in turn both these products will become mute. That's the dilemma. If a sobo doesn't touch their ATC system, then of course. 3rd party products are back on the menu. What do you guys think?
BATC's price is such that you could use it untill MSFS2024 drops and if it is then redundant stop using or, if still usefull (what I suspect tbh...) carry on using it with FS24!
I don't care if god, hisself, is doing perfect ATC. I'll never pay for a subscription. I'm too new to ATC flying so I can't say anything about usage, but BATC is what I just paid for because it's a one time fee.
Yeah, some people buy the cheapest car they can and drive around thinking they made the wisest choice until the transmission begins to fail, the AC doesn’t work when the temp is over 80 and the infotainment system crashes constantly…
My father always said, “you get what you pay for!”
I hate when an ATC program can’t handle simple requests like a runway change… 😢
But you do you, Randall!
@@sep2345 BATC will be able to fix bugs and be correct a LOT better than a LLM chatbot, who can talk, but still horribly fail when precise logic is needed. it was a deliberate developer choice to not use a LLM. it's really nice that you can chat with it, but you dont want llm hallucinations in something like ATC
@@sep2345😂
I get it. Why pay for something you’re not really going to use. I fly mostly VFR so SI is my only option
@@fihalhohi5353did you just call Chatgpt-o a Chatbot ? 😂thats crazy
"Way to on the rails and that's the problem" Is it? I dare you to go fly a real flight and try to offer a ham sandwich to the controller. I absolutely don't see this as a problem, and I'd rather have on rails ATC rather than daydreaming ATC.
Dit you ever Tried ProATC Verry good
Sayintensions ATC voices are more natural, BATC is somehow agressive and somehow not natural, or its only me?
id do anything to get one of them to develop for mac xplane 12.
People have successfully used SI in wine on mac
i have beyondatc and very happy with it but the only downside is it doesnt work with Xplane.. thats the only reason i was considering sayintentions however, the price is too damn expensive for me
S.i., what about AI Traffic?
Nice ORNIPHOPTER
20 a month is a steal...BATC all the way
SI. By Far.
I refuse to use any ATC that pronounces "three" as "tree". That includes the built-in MSFS ATC. I've never heard an American controller say "tree" either while personally flying in real life, or listening to ATC on UA-cam videos.
They do in Jamaica and Ireland... but then again, regular people there say "tree" as far as I've seen so I'm not sure that counts :D
Sorry bud, it has been an FAA standard since... oh 1956, sure in the US you hear it both ways, I don't personally use it, nor do I say 'fife' :) But its a real thing and I assure you there are ATC controllers around that country that use it. Kind of silly to be hung up on it really :)
EDIT, PLOT TWIST: I wrote the crap below before trying SI. After I tried SI for 10 minutes and after they decreased their monthly sub to just 18 EUR/month, I'm completely blown away by it. I now use it more often than VATSIM. It's absolutely amazing.
DISREGARD THE CRAP BELOW:
There is no comparison. One is $30 per month (might as well be $3000). The other is $30 for a lifetime purchase plus a few more for the premium voices.
I'm going BATC all the way. Do NOT (I repeat, do NOT) sponsor such subscription models. Stand your ground.
Glad to see you stood your ground :D
@@JohnVanderbeck yes, all it took was a 10 minute trial. Then I subscribed on the spot and I'm still using SI every day because it's the most awesome thing that has happened to flight sim since ZX Spectrum's Harrier Attack.
Beyond ATC by far.!
Uhhhhhh uhhhhhhhhhb, uhhhhhhhhhh, uhhhhhhh NSB
Does anyone think that the new 2024 Microsoft Flight Simulator will feature an ATC system that rivals these?
no
no because msfs-atc is basically the same horrific experience since 40 years. Zero progress was made
Fs Hud
The cool kids watched this live
ORNITHOPTER
Say intentions model is vastly better than BATC. Being able to load up at any airport and look at the sectional or plates and put those frequencies in and it work is fabulous. BATC you have to look at the client to figure out what you can do. BATC more like a sim, Say Intentions more like real world.
You can enter frequencies in BATC as well. If you tune your radio in the plane it works exactly as SI. If you notice he said it was a "quality of life feature", not that it was the only way.
That is exactly what I did was tune it in the plane and BATC said frequency not available. And it was a couple of major airports.
I don’t use the app I use plates and sectionals to fly using the aircraft radio and if you use it using this method BATC will have issues.
@@OTTNext Thanks for your perspective. Obviously with BATC being out barely a week none of us have had much of a chance to use it, just a handful of flights if that. Sorry it's not working well for you that way. I also so not manually tune the radios (a big reason for me getting BATC was to get better flying with ATC so I can perform better on something like VATSIM. SI would be far too expensive to use as a learning aid.) so that is a big difference.
The intro is already not correct. You have only ONE AI-ATC Software.
OMG, so many petty haters currently out and about. LLMs are not even 'real' AI. Let it go and be happy that finally we are getting decent ATC options...
@@themorethemerrier281please explain what is real AI? I think you might have a little research to do before you make such broad (incorrect) statements…
Truth! 🤜🏾🤛🏼
@@sep2345 'AI' is a currently way overhyped term. These tools are so great because they make clever use of machine learning algorithms. But they are not really intelligent. They mimic intelligence and comprehension.
My old 90s chess computer also is (was) ai... and an extremely good one at that, quite unbeatable (only at chess, didn't do ATC very well to be fair...)
Just for the fact that SayIntentions doesnt charge credits to talk with ATC. That alone is gold. Beyond ATC seems like their cutting corners...
Beyond ATC doesn't charge credits for the standard voices, just premium voices. Considering that you're going to pay $30 one time for Beyond ATC compared to $30 per month for SayIntentions, I wouldn't say they're cutting corners, they are making a more affordable product.
why do you think Say Intentions is 30$ / month... you are paying credits
@@Kadesh86 its either a yearly charge of $299 or $30a month. And its NOT credits. I can interact with the atc for as many flights as i want. Beyond is good for about 5 flights of credits outside of the limited one time charge before you need more talk-time credits. Ive used SI since week 1 (feb 2024) and its a more realistic ai that can handle extreme requests and situations that Beyond doesn't.
@@comiccrazy3 I get what you say. But, BATC costs 30$ a lifetime. You can use basic voices for free, and they are good. SI charges monthly (or yearly), of course voices are a part of that charge… just ask them why it is subscription based?
With BeyondATC, you only lose credits if you are using premium voice options which by chosing the basic voice you don't lose any credits as that is provided for free I've done serveral flights already with BeyondATC probably only used Premium voice once that was during release to see how it work been using basic voice ever since than. I do like say intentions where you can listen to other players.
msfs..nope
Pointless exercise when one is in EA and openly states there are missing features and bugs.
The flight sim community is obsessed with comparisons and pitching one product against another.
It’s getting tiresome……
Only part of this video is comparing current features. The rest is about comparing their approaches which will give us a good idea of which will be a long term solution. They’re also both early access.
@@Brian.Murray that doesn’t really change my point/opinion. I wasn’t referencing any particular type of comparisons, just generally which includes features, approach etc.
Both in EA probably strengthens my point and makes it even more pointless. Both are at different points in development and a moving target. There’s no way to compare apples for apples. It’s like trying to compare two houses when they’re only half built.
This will end up the same as X-Plane vs MSFS, flight model vs flight model, Active Sky vs Rex etc. Toxic simmers (not referencing you) belittling each other and their choices. They’re already using the phrase “Rails” FSX flashback 🫣
Funny that you disabled comments on the worthless hit piece you tried to do on Gryder. First off, he wasn't PIC and he wasn't flying. Second, the tailwheel had nothing to do with the loss of control. If you did a little research, you would find that it was the right brake line. Might want to revise your video.
This guy is paid by same group that pays Juan.