@@BlindJustice Tom doesn't know just how true his statement is. Eight days after the nukes were dropped on japan in August 1945, the USA was handed over to the United Nations, and at that time, the USA became a Corporate Member "STATE." "No UN Member "STATE" retains Sovereign Nation Standing." The UN was created and given to Stalin as a birday gift by the Rothschilds. All documented in congressional hearings, Supreme Court cases and International Treaties
no, more fascism than show trials. a russian trial would release the bits of video. US courts set aside those pesky law things. they have no place in the US court system. just ask justice thomas. selling his vote for a motorhome. how dare the public enter OPEN court without submitting to violations of rights under color of law. judge and Sheriff should be charged.
kicking a member of the public out of a courtroom is a 6th amendment violation The Sixth Amendment guarantees the rights of criminal defendants, including the right to a public trial without unnecessary delay, the right to a lawyer, the right to an impartial jury, and the right to know who your accusers are and the nature of the charges and evidence against you. as such, judicial immunity goes out the window
I pulled 30 days 15 on suicide watch in Rockingham county jail for simply picking MY helmet up and setting it back on MY seat where the dirty pig knocked it off of… They retaliated and put me in solitary confinement - suicide watch because I refused to answers any questions… I was charged for interfering and tampering and found guilty for interfering and they dropped the tampering because they knew the whole thing was BS… I didn’t even get a chance to speak on my behalf… I said may explain what happened, the judge said if you open your mouth again I’m going to give you 30 more days. My court appointment lawyer was absolutely worthless, I cussed him out in the hallway and almost got arrested for that too.… That place is the biggest shite hole I’ve ever seen in my life… Every single one of them are corrupt to the core… I’m having to go to court now because I was a passenger and they pulled me out of the car threatened to arrest me if I didn’t give up all my rights, illegally searched me and found a sprinkle of weed in a cellophane and charged me with paraphernalia which is a bigger charge than a small amount of weed… I don’t have a lawyer, I’m disabled and I can’t afford one so I’m completely screwed…. 🤬
@@EJ-74 God bless you I believe every word your saying yes it is a organize racketeering crime organization start with Team Reidsville that's how they are money laundering this goes into court court appointment lawyers probation the jailhouse the da we don't even know how high
"... I ask them their name that simply sets them off to be a confrontational and agitated". If you haven't heard the audio of the interaction, it would make sense for a judge to kick someone out for being confrontational and agitated. However I did listen to the audio recording, and seems according to the judge just saying "no" to the judge makes someone confrontational and agitated.
@@LawernceSimmons I think judge does know the definition of the word "belligerent," Judge is using those provocative words as an escalation step in describing the man's behavior. To me it sounds like the judge is the one who is triggered and becomes aggressive after the man exercises his right not to identify.
How his name would assist this judge with any informed security threat is just absurd. Plus this judge claims his hand gestures were threatening what if he was deaf & using sign language.
7:00 Some guy was shaking his head in disagreement with what was being said, so he was belligerent by being disagreeable and refusing to say his name simply for shaking his head in disagreement? So this Judge's logic is, if I disagree with this judge and refuse to identify to him who I am, I might be a criminal that might mean to cause harm to someone. If that isn't speculation, I don't know what is.
The Judge has no "reasonable suspicion" that a member of the public ever posed a threat to security. His personal opinion is not evidence of a crime. Like the police and public servants, Judges are not allowed to have a personal opinion. They work under law, and nothing else. It's Honor became "subjective" and did not work towards the "objective" stance of his duty. He picked on someone, for no valid reason, and chose his friends on the side of the prosecution to blame for his mistake.
I don't have a crystal ball but what I do have is a basic understanding of the ADA. What this judge and others are doing is acting illegally in not following the law. This is not how a retired disabled veteran should be treated.
The numbers of lies told by Albright and the court officers is staggering. The security video in the courtroom would prove this judge and the officers to be lying under oath. When the judge ordered Mr. Nelson and the DA to leave the courtroom and go watch videos, the court session ended. As Mike was getting up I leaned forward, I was sitting directly in back of Mike, and whispered to Mike that I was here if he needed anything. My whisper was so quiet Mike did not hear it. But, the deputy standing next to Mike, did hear me. That is when the deputy started yelling at me for disturbing the court. Mind you, the court was over. As for the hand gestures the judge/deputies talk about...I am hard of hearing and if I put my hand up to my ear and cup it, I can more easily hear a voice. Now, after being tossed from the courtroom I stood in the hallway with my ear and cupped hand pressed up to the crack in the door so I could hear what was going on. At that point one of the deputies interrupted the judge and stated I was making obscene hand gestures. That is when the judge responded to the deputies to have me thrown out from the building. Albright step a pile of shit of his own making. He told way too many lies and inorder to cover them up he had me tossed from the courtroom and the building. Believe it or not I confronted him about it during a proceeding in a different courtroom in a different county. At that hearing he asked me to state my name. I refused. It was then that I warned him, if he attempted the same thing I was going to file official complaints against him. I also told him that the two deputies in his courtroom in Rockingham had lied to him and made up things that never happened. This second time around the judge was not as confrontational. I think he realised it was not in his best interest to be a thug.
Been thinking of you lately and hoping you and the Mrs were doing ok. This video shows you aren't doing as well as you should be. Semper Fi. Fingers crossed for you.
worldwide threats by unknown people with unknown evidence....belligerent, aggressive, and no evidence....wouldn't it be nice if there was film of this? Ending taxation, tracking, and fraud currency sounds like the best solution to stop the ruin and theft by "essentials".
I know you don't want to hear this, however.... the judge has the right, yes I SAID RIGHT to control the inside of the courtroom. Asking the man his name was well within the RIGHT of the judge/court. The judge could have found the man in direct contempt of court and had him jailed until he identified himself, that didn't happen, instead the man was removed from the courtroom and then the courthouse.
@@jdkeyes2000 where exactly is this supposed right written? And does this supposed right trump the 4th Amendment to the US Constitution (the Supreme Law of the land)?
@@BlindJustice All you have to do is ignore what the judge tells you and see where you sleep after a contempt finding. I believe you have already experienced this. FAFO literally fuck around and find out.
@@jdkeyes2000 No one doubts that a thug wearing a robe while hiding behind a police department can inflict his will on someone that does not have the same power backing him up that's where ''might makes right'' comes from! Who gave them that power since the Constitution clearly says what our ''rights'' are and no where in there does it say your ''rights'' end inside a courtroom!
that is not a right, that is an act by a tyrant. A free man has the right to life, liberty, and ownership of property without taxations....something you won't find either...lol
"When you see oppression and do nothing to stop it, you become a part of that oppression." My Dad.
Tell me you are part of a gang without telling me you are part of a gang
i must have been kidnapped and brought to a russian court?
@@tomd7995 yup
@@BlindJustice Tom doesn't know just how true his statement is. Eight days after the nukes were dropped on japan in August 1945, the USA was handed over to the United Nations, and at that time, the USA became a Corporate Member "STATE." "No UN Member "STATE" retains Sovereign Nation Standing." The UN was created and given to Stalin as a birday gift by the Rothschilds. All documented in congressional hearings, Supreme Court cases and International Treaties
Russia has nothing on Merica courts!
no, more fascism than show trials. a russian trial would release the bits of video. US courts set aside those pesky law things. they have no place in the US court system. just ask justice thomas. selling his vote for a motorhome.
how dare the public enter OPEN court without submitting to violations of rights under color of law. judge and Sheriff should be charged.
@@chrisoakey9841 💯
So it's not an open court, because they may be in the wrong court.
@@lizcollinson2692 yup
kicking a member of the public out of a courtroom is a 6th amendment violation
The Sixth Amendment guarantees the rights of criminal defendants, including the right to a public trial without unnecessary delay, the right to a lawyer, the right to an impartial jury, and the right to know who your accusers are and the nature of the charges and evidence against you.
as such, judicial immunity goes out the window
@@ghostwriter720 indeed
So much for due process
@@randilaatsch9758 over four years have passed on this case. They’re not interested in due process.
Thank you for doing this court room There is so much corruption there it not funny I have so much experience against them
I pulled 30 days 15 on suicide watch in Rockingham county jail for simply picking MY helmet up and setting it back on MY seat where the dirty pig knocked it off of… They retaliated and put me in solitary confinement - suicide watch because I refused to answers any questions… I was charged for interfering and tampering and found guilty for interfering and they dropped the tampering because they knew the whole thing was BS… I didn’t even get a chance to speak on my behalf… I said may explain what happened, the judge said if you open your mouth again I’m going to give you 30 more days. My court appointment lawyer was absolutely worthless, I cussed him out in the hallway and almost got arrested for that too.… That place is the biggest shite hole I’ve ever seen in my life… Every single one of them are corrupt to the core… I’m having to go to court now because I was a passenger and they pulled me out of the car threatened to arrest me if I didn’t give up all my rights, illegally searched me and found a sprinkle of weed in a cellophane and charged me with paraphernalia which is a bigger charge than a small amount of weed… I don’t have a lawyer, I’m disabled and I can’t afford one so I’m completely screwed…. 🤬
@@EJ-74 God bless you I believe every word your saying yes it is a organize racketeering crime organization start with Team Reidsville that's how they are money laundering this goes into court court appointment lawyers probation the jailhouse the da we don't even know how high
You wonder where the cops learned their "creative writing skills"? Former lawyers, that now wish to be referred to as "Honorable". What a sham.
@@ThSloth_InDaGetto it’s corrupt all the way through.
@@BlindJustice These are not Lawyer's and this is not a Con-stitutional court or country
"... I ask them their name that simply sets them off to be a confrontational and agitated". If you haven't heard the audio of the interaction, it would make sense for a judge to kick someone out for being confrontational and agitated. However I did listen to the audio recording, and seems according to the judge just saying "no" to the judge makes someone confrontational and agitated.
@@CancunManny it’s bananas
*Belligerent: Warlike; Given to waging war.*
I don't think the judge knows what that word means.
@@LawernceSimmons I think judge does know the definition of the word "belligerent," Judge is using those provocative words as an escalation step in describing the man's behavior. To me it sounds like the judge is the one who is triggered and becomes aggressive after the man exercises his right not to identify.
What he did was break his oath of office and the 4th Amendment. This Judge needs to retire.
No he should be locked up immediately!!!!
By the way lawyer can continually take the bar exam unlike a medical student taking the board
By the judge calling in his own witness, he is in fact practicing law from the bench. From what I believe is that, is illegal in all 50 states.
You are an ediot.
How his name would assist this judge with any informed security threat is just absurd. Plus this judge claims his hand gestures were threatening what if he was deaf & using sign language.
@@AB-et1ug he actually is hard of hearing and was cupping his ear to hear.
If the judge doesn’t uphold the 4th amendment and the whole case was about the 4th amendment, how can it be a fair trial?
@@wendyford2252 exactly!!
HFTCD ✌🏻
HFTJD ✌🏻
7:00 Some guy was shaking his head in disagreement with what was being said, so he was belligerent by being disagreeable and refusing to say his name simply for shaking his head in disagreement?
So this Judge's logic is, if I disagree with this judge and refuse to identify to him who I am, I might be a criminal that might mean to cause harm to someone.
If that isn't speculation, I don't know what is.
Nailed it.
WTF
The Judge has no "reasonable suspicion" that a member of the public ever posed a threat to security. His personal opinion is not evidence of a crime. Like the police and public servants, Judges are not allowed to have a personal opinion. They work under law, and nothing else. It's Honor became "subjective" and did not work towards the "objective" stance of his duty. He picked on someone, for no valid reason, and chose his friends on the side of the prosecution to blame for his mistake.
Judges expect the average guy to say "objection.. point of order?" 😂 they abuse others to imprison you for money
@@RandomsFandom yup
👍❤️
I can't listen to this tyrant
Judge thinks free people in the audiance have to answer his questions. "For security" It's BS
Is not any of his damn business unless he's Prosecuting them
Good job guys
I feel so sorry for Blind Justice. They way he is getting treated makes me so mad
robed Klown - nothing less
This judge is pathetic
I don't have a crystal ball but what I do have is a basic understanding of the ADA. What this judge and others are doing is acting illegally in not following the law. This is not how a retired disabled veteran should be treated.
@@ianblunt6515 or how anyone should be treated
I certainly hope it wasn’t a bench trial.
@@bryanmellen2399 this was a pre trial hearing. The trial is supposed to be a jury trial.
Bro miss eric brandt
@@BigDaddyNewsWI indeed
@@BigDaddyNewsWI #FreeEricBrandt
HFTCD ✌🏻
They r just bad people doing their worse.
The numbers of lies told by Albright and the court officers is staggering. The security video in the courtroom would prove this judge and the officers to be lying under oath. When the judge ordered Mr. Nelson and the DA to leave the courtroom and go watch videos, the court session ended. As Mike was getting up I leaned forward, I was sitting directly in back of Mike, and whispered to Mike that I was here if he needed anything. My whisper was so quiet Mike did not hear it. But, the deputy standing next to Mike, did hear me. That is when the deputy started yelling at me for disturbing the court. Mind you, the court was over. As for the hand gestures the judge/deputies talk about...I am hard of hearing and if I put my hand up to my ear and cup it, I can more easily hear a voice. Now, after being tossed from the courtroom I stood in the hallway with my ear and cupped hand pressed up to the crack in the door so I could hear what was going on. At that point one of the deputies interrupted the judge and stated I was making obscene hand gestures. That is when the judge responded to the deputies to have me thrown out from the building. Albright step a pile of shit of his own making. He told way too many lies and inorder to cover them up he had me tossed from the courtroom and the building.
Believe it or not I confronted him about it during a proceeding in a different courtroom in a different county. At that hearing he asked me to state my name. I refused. It was then that I warned him, if he attempted the same thing I was going to file official complaints against him. I also told him that the two deputies in his courtroom in Rockingham had lied to him and made up things that never happened. This second time around the judge was not as confrontational. I think he realised it was not in his best interest to be a thug.
@@lightning9279 oh wow. Didn’t know that.
He's trying to play off his bad attitude and controlling Behavior as being concerned for the safety of his court
Narnia requires less imagination than what the judge has used in this video.
Been thinking of you lately and hoping you and the Mrs were doing ok. This video shows you aren't doing as well as you should be. Semper Fi. Fingers crossed for you.
The judge is being such a crybaby !!
He’s acting like the cops and how they are scared of their shadow.
"Power tends to corrupt, and absolute power corrupts absolutely"
Conclusion of what?!
MERICA!!!
😮😮😮
If the judge held the bible it would probably catch on fire
worldwide threats by unknown people with unknown evidence....belligerent, aggressive, and no evidence....wouldn't it be nice if there was film of this? Ending taxation, tracking, and fraud currency sounds like the best solution to stop the ruin and theft by "essentials".
👽 .... .. thanks for the video -- H F T C D
I know you don't want to hear this, however.... the judge has the right, yes I SAID RIGHT to control the inside of the courtroom. Asking the man his name was well within the RIGHT of the judge/court. The judge could have found the man in direct contempt of court and had him jailed until he identified himself, that didn't happen, instead the man was removed from the courtroom and then the courthouse.
@@jdkeyes2000 where exactly is this supposed right written? And does this supposed right trump the 4th Amendment to the US Constitution (the Supreme Law of the land)?
@@BlindJustice All you have to do is ignore what the judge tells you and see where you sleep after a contempt finding. I believe you have already experienced this. FAFO literally fuck around and find out.
@@jdkeyes2000 No one doubts that a thug wearing a robe while hiding behind a police department can inflict his will on someone that does not have the same power backing him up that's where ''might makes right'' comes from! Who gave them that power since the Constitution clearly says what our ''rights'' are and no where in there does it say your ''rights'' end inside a courtroom!
that is not a right, that is an act by a tyrant. A free man has the right to life, liberty, and ownership of property without taxations....something you won't find either...lol
So I guess the judge is innocent of harassing the girl and making her put on a jail uniform and handcuffs?