40 Minutes Of Weird Science Theories | Full Series | BBC Earth Science

Поділитися
Вставка
  • Опубліковано 16 тра 2024
  • Is it actually possible to build a time machine? Or how about living forever? Watch Dr Josie Peters take on the world's most puzzling science theories in the full series of 'Weird Science'...
    Best of Earth Science: bit.ly/EarthLabOriginals
    Best of BBC Earth: bit.ly/TheBestOfBBCEarthVideos
    #WeirdScience #Compilation
    This is a channel from BBC Studios who help fund new BBC programmes. Service information and feedback: bbcworldwide.com/vod-feedback-...
  • Наука та технологія

КОМЕНТАРІ • 150

  • @KeithChastain-YouGotKeith
    @KeithChastain-YouGotKeith 7 місяців тому +1

    These are great thanks 👍

  • @stevenkarmazenuk2540
    @stevenkarmazenuk2540 8 місяців тому +24

    People think that time is a linear progression from point A to B, when in fact, strictly speaking, it's more of a...wibbly-wobbly...ball...of...timey-wimey...stuff.

    • @VesperanceRising
      @VesperanceRising 7 місяців тому

      did you get your screwdriver from a fast little blue hedgehog..?

    • @-handala-
      @-handala- 7 місяців тому +1

      It’s a flat circle, man.

    • @stevenkarmazenuk2540
      @stevenkarmazenuk2540 7 місяців тому +1

      @@-handala- Well, yes, but only when viewed from a lower dimensional perspective.

    • @-handala-
      @-handala- 7 місяців тому +1

      @@stevenkarmazenuk2540 *exhales* i see what you mean, bruh.

    • @AE-yp8ty
      @AE-yp8ty 7 місяців тому +1

      I came here to see a Jeremy Bearimy joke and there wasn't one! So here it is

  • @mohamedalfahad268
    @mohamedalfahad268 8 місяців тому

    Thanks alot ❤

  • @iami0
    @iami0 8 місяців тому +1

    @BBC Earth Lab, this clip the sound volume is a bit too low, compare to other clip in UA-cam.

  • @DMS-pq8
    @DMS-pq8 7 місяців тому +6

    Love Josie, Please have her do more videos

  • @theobserver9131
    @theobserver9131 7 місяців тому +2

    We're all travelling through time all the.....time. One second per second, in one direction. Sometimes faster, sometimes slower. The challenge is moving in the other direction.

  • @cesararias7023
    @cesararias7023 7 місяців тому +1

    The last thing I thought I would watch today was Emma Stone talking about weird scientific theories.

    • @BURDYMAN777
      @BURDYMAN777 Місяць тому +1

      Its 7 am and I just woke up. This made me laugh harder than it should have.

  • @rayjasmantas9609
    @rayjasmantas9609 8 місяців тому

    When working with gravity analysis it must be considered a factor of the gravity's field adjustment in Space stepping adjustment at the same time of trying to go straight up.

    • @rayjasmantas9609
      @rayjasmantas9609 8 місяців тому

      Also when the gravity field is actually said created, will it pass the known steps that fully declare the gravity being present and completely neutral to interfering with anything. The list of characteristics test pass.

    • @rayjasmantas9609
      @rayjasmantas9609 8 місяців тому

      So its not considered artificial.

    • @Isawwhatyoudid
      @Isawwhatyoudid 7 місяців тому

      The intensity of the gravitational field suggest that the coefficient of the associated quantum field is inversely proportional to the energy being applied to the system. I got my PhD in Astroquantum Relative Micro Physics at a now defunct University but it came with free steaks and vodka.

  • @henriknielsen1662
    @henriknielsen1662 8 місяців тому +1

    Next week: Latest news from the depths of Loch Ness

  • @mattyvlietstra5017
    @mattyvlietstra5017 8 місяців тому +1

    Without bending space-time there's no way to effect gravitg

  • @jeffkuntz1569
    @jeffkuntz1569 7 місяців тому +1

    As far as anti gravity.. have you looked into Zero-Point energy??

  • @NathanBoardman19
    @NathanBoardman19 8 місяців тому +3

    That antigravity video that the Russian scientist played was compelling... I think I understand how it works... the square overcame gravity because of a strand of thread and most likely a hand pulling said string out of frame. I mean you can clearly see the string in the footage.

    • @jojolafrite90
      @jojolafrite90 7 місяців тому

      Maybe a scientific paper called uh no, I'll just give you the names Martin Tajmar and Clovis De Matos. Maybe it will make you rethink the possibility there may actually not have any hidden string. because there seem to be genuine unknown physics that we are barely turning around. Who knows? This is not studied outside the extremely secretive black programs about UF0's.

  • @Isawwhatyoudid
    @Isawwhatyoudid 7 місяців тому

    31:00 I thought the inability to comingle Relativity and Quantum Theory was one of the biggest ongoing problems in science - that was plot twist to Interstellar and Kip Thorne advised that. Yes it is a movie and yes they took artistic license at some points but I have heard/read that from several sources for quite some time. I only mentioned the movie because it something many (I hope most if not all) have seen. This guy is far more educated than me but I thought that had not been done yet.

    • @DoseofScienceDoS
      @DoseofScienceDoS 7 місяців тому

      You are correct. Combining general relativity (gravity) with quantum mechanics has not been done. It is called the ‘grand unified theory’ or ‘gut’

  • @MrDuane-lr8dm
    @MrDuane-lr8dm 16 днів тому

    I think, instead of travelling back in time, you'd just slow time down for as far as the influence of the gravity. You wouldn't travel into the past, you'd observe the increased motion of the present. And it would be a one way trip.
    At best, time viewing would be the end result. As Einstein was accredited for hypothesizing in the movie "Paycheck".

  • @omsingharjit
    @omsingharjit 8 місяців тому +3

    The philadelphia experiment , the hutchison effect , kapanadze generator , Zero point Energy and is it Another hoax or joke 😅😅
    Edited : - 9:45 yes I forget, Prof Ron malletts CTC time machine too since there is no any update of it for long time.

    • @ticthak
      @ticthak 8 місяців тому

      Presuming something is a hoax or doesn't work because we've haven't managed to do it yet is rank stupidity. Dr. Mallett could be completely wrong, and he'd admit it in the face of NO positive data. He hasn't got ENOUGH positive data to support the (closed, time-like loops is not his alone) hypothesis.
      Dropping the H2O vapor into the laser beam would disrupt any possible effect, so that much was just for illustration.

  • @pro-storm4951
    @pro-storm4951 8 місяців тому +1

    Audio Levels

  • @user-hx5lz4qr1c
    @user-hx5lz4qr1c 17 днів тому

    time is universe acknowledging and varifying its own existance

  • @donaldjmccann
    @donaldjmccann 8 місяців тому +2

    The title suggests that they have no idea what a scientific theory is. The show would be more aptly named ''Screwball Hypotheses.'' I saw this program years ago.

  • @pavelsmith2267
    @pavelsmith2267 7 місяців тому

    The nautilus was the first time machine.
    Captain Nemo

  • @SurajSrinivas6
    @SurajSrinivas6 8 місяців тому +1

    Once, back in the past, a man, living between those who thought the earth was flat once said that "the earth is round" he was hanged immediately.
    Few years later someone else said that earth is not the centre of the galaxy, people got offended and he too met the same fate.

    • @darrenwebb1813
      @darrenwebb1813 8 місяців тому +1

      We have never thought the earth was flat....we thought it was round, like all the other round things in the night sky and we could see it better unlike today night sky

    • @NathanBoardman19
      @NathanBoardman19 8 місяців тому

      Copernicus was actually a canon of a Catholic church and published his heliocentric theories in his old age... he died of a cerebral haemorrhage shortly after the publication of his book and essentially didn't hear much of the controversy that his studies had caused. So, no he was not hanged. But others were killed for believing Copernicus' teachings, most notably Galileo Galilei, who was jailed for life and died in incarceration.
      Like wise, Eratosthenes (the ancient Greek who calculated the circumference of the Earth) was not killed because of his work. He became blind in his old age and (according to historical accounts) voluntarily starved himself to death... but by no means was Eratosthenes the first person to propose that the Earth is round, the earliest documented to have been discovered which proposed the spherical Earth concept dates from around the 5th century BC, and it is highly likely that humans believed the Earth was round long before 5th century BC.

  • @stanbussell7516
    @stanbussell7516 7 місяців тому

    The universe doesnt record itself as it goes along. So when you step into the time machine, you may just end up in another deminsion and n9t foward in time or backwards. Just in a different place.

  • @philipmcdonagh1094
    @philipmcdonagh1094 8 місяців тому +1

    Think I'll cancel that pre order of a hover board from Amazon. However time travel, information travels at the speed of light that is the first hurdle overcome. Forget about objects-humans traveling back in time, what about a radio broadcast, fair enough you could only send one back as far as the 1920's. Unfortunately it would be no good to us all they could do with any warnings we send them would be to create an alternate time line to ours. If they stopped WW2 from happening it would be fine for them, as far as were concerned it still happened. I mean 60 million people who died in WW2 all of a sudden are not dead just imagine the outcome of that, books, films, people would just cease to exist along with most of our technology, that's star Trek stuff. Laws of physics prevent that by alternate time lines. Okay you could choose to go back and live there and become rich with the knowledge and technology you brought with you which could be a good or bad thing to do. But get it into your heads you cant change history.

  • @raymondingram2539
    @raymondingram2539 7 місяців тому

    Without mass gravity doesn't exist, you can't create something for something that doesn't exist.

  • @dean-zt1fv
    @dean-zt1fv 8 місяців тому +1

    Strange. When that guy in the car, near the beginning, says "manipulating gravity", you can tell it was dubbed in, the voice is different, and it's at a point when the camera is not showing him speaking. I couldn't in good faith continue watching the video. Maybe, it's nothing, but when you're presenting a video that deals with such a controversial and highly speculative subject as antigravity research, you might not want to fiddle with your evidence.

  • @stancil83
    @stancil83 Місяць тому

    You do know all that stuff in the intro has been declassified right. What I find strange is the fact that it's more interesting to me that my empathy is keeping me from watching anything after the intro.

  • @larryfulkerson4505
    @larryfulkerson4505 Місяць тому

    Time is just nature's way of keeping things from happening all at the same time.

  • @jasoncochrane8616
    @jasoncochrane8616 8 місяців тому

    In Australia in queensland our time stays the same and in sw they turn time back and forward for 3 mths over sumer meaning gold coast you celebrate new years then go back for 1 hour and do news years agin but as quick as you go foward you ho backwa4d so time travel yes

  • @walkabout16
    @walkabout16 7 місяців тому

    In the realm of science, weird and wild,
    With BBC Earth Lab, we're beguiled,
    For forty minutes, theories strange unfold,
    A tapestry of mysteries, stories untold.
    From the quantum quirks of the tiniest things,
    To the cosmic dances where the universe sings,
    Infinite dimensions, parallel worlds that gleam,
    These strange science theories, like a lucid dream.
    With hosts who guide us through the cosmic haze,
    In awe, we're lost in a mesmerizing maze,
    Black holes, dark matter, and time's twisting thread,
    40 minutes of wonder, where curiosity is fed.
    The multiverse's secrets, like a shimmering pearl,
    Intriguing notions that make our minds twirl,
    From wormholes to antimatter's cryptic sway,
    BBC Earth Lab's journey, we wish to stay.
    In each episode, knowledge unfurls,
    As we explore the cosmos, a treasure of pearls,
    With theories so weird, they boggle the brain,
    BBC Earth Lab's insights, a captivating reign.
    So, here's to the series, both strange and sublime,
    40 minutes of science in the realm of time,
    From quirkiness to brilliance, each theory's a gem,
    With BBC Earth Lab, we'll always say amen.

    • @stancil83
      @stancil83 Місяць тому

      Sorry I was admiring your work and maybe you could help me with mine. It's a little contrived but I think I could clean it up a little if I had some pointers. Please forgive me as you read because it's not quite on your level. Your skills make mine look low bro
      w
      .
      .
      .
      .
      .
      .
      .
      .
      .
      .
      .
      .
      Simping hard for that Big Black....hmmm darn. I forgot what the C stans for. Crap. I am so sorry. When Inspiration calls you gotta answer. And you are very inspirational indeed. Did I mention how sorry I am for this.

  • @WiwatChang
    @WiwatChang 8 місяців тому +7

    Aren't all or most sciences commonly accepted today once weird? ;-)

  • @EyesOfByes
    @EyesOfByes 8 місяців тому +2

    33:10 Dont do an image Google search of that...

  • @EyesOfByes
    @EyesOfByes 8 місяців тому

    No Time for Caution

  • @Isawwhatyoudid
    @Isawwhatyoudid 7 місяців тому +1

    Ive often thought of the black hole universe theory just based on common, layman knowledge, of black holes, the inverse of a black hole sounds a lot like the big bang. Perhaps as the black hole on the flip side consumes matter that is the engine behind our expanding universe. That would explain dark energy and perhaps as that black hole consumes matter on the flip side as soon as it comes in it is dark matter and through some unknown process or the acceleration it experienced on the way in (if a black holes pull is such that light can not escape then wouldn't everything it pulls in have to be, at some point, accelerated to above the speed of light once past the even horizon? Maybe as it comes in it is dark matter and that is just the transition phase of matter from the other side being turned into dark energy. It is the acceleration to and beyond light speed that does it and the gravity of that matter is the last to go or a "ghost" for a lack of a better term. I am no scientist but I watch, read and ponder this stuff quite a bit.

  • @mrxmry3264
    @mrxmry3264 8 місяців тому

    let's assume the guy with the time machine goes back and saves his father. then what? the guy has no reason to go back, so he doesmn't, his father dies and gives him a reason to go back and save him, which he does, removing his reason to go back, and so on, and so on...

    • @faizanrana2998
      @faizanrana2998 7 місяців тому

      Aaaahahha aaaaaaahaaaa

    • @mrxmry3264
      @mrxmry3264 7 місяців тому

      @@faizanrana2998 what's so funny?

    • @faizanrana2998
      @faizanrana2998 7 місяців тому

      @@mrxmry3264 it's an infinite loop browski

  • @rayjasmantas9609
    @rayjasmantas9609 8 місяців тому

    Is the question of time travel based on the question, did you forget something?

    • @rayjasmantas9609
      @rayjasmantas9609 8 місяців тому

      Time has to always be considered a personalized activity, shared or not - thus a being.

    • @rayjasmantas9609
      @rayjasmantas9609 8 місяців тому

      So if a person as a being is able to time travel by will, maybe, if using a machine, is the time travel done by the machine or by the being with time adjustment activities?

  • @georgeflitzer7160
    @georgeflitzer7160 8 місяців тому

    They have not said solved the hard problem of consciousness.

  • @abiofficial-ws7pn
    @abiofficial-ws7pn 8 місяців тому +2

    Why is the fuel needed to travel to the nearest star is equivalent to the mass of the entire Sun?

    • @josephj1973
      @josephj1973 8 місяців тому +1

      Maybe because the closest star from Earth is about 24 trillion miles away lol

    • @abiofficial-ws7pn
      @abiofficial-ws7pn 8 місяців тому +2

      @@josephj1973 Not sure why you have the lol in your message. Why can't we just coast till when the craft is near the nearest star, and then use thrust as necessary?

    • @josephj1973
      @josephj1973 8 місяців тому +2

      We can't travel at the speed of light, which is 300, 000 km per second. So us traveling on a spaceship moving 8 km per second would take us almost 150, 000 years to get to the nearest star. So yeah, we need a lot of fuel

    • @DannyMancheno
      @DannyMancheno 8 місяців тому

      @@abiofficial-ws7pnSimply put, you’ll face sol’s gravity about 49.9999999..% of the way there until it *flips* to the other star’s gravity at the 50% mark. Granted both systems have equal mass. Not really relevant at the moment at these scales.
      You need to *push* the sol systems mass away from you in order to escape it. Right? The sun being about 99.8% of our system mass. It’d make sense to consider it as the amount of total energy we can use.
      Hence you need about the sun’s mass maybe more, in order to escape it onto the next star.
      This was done in the 70s with the voyager spacecrafts, they managed to push enough mass to escape it. Also btw none of this made sense i made it all up.

    • @abiofficial-ws7pn
      @abiofficial-ws7pn 8 місяців тому +2

      @@josephj1973 I think you added one too many zeroes. I got 15000 years at 8km/s (the speed you mentioned). That also gives 8000 years at the speed of the Voyager spacecraft (forgot which one). Unless I'm mistaken myself

  • @user-tu2rk6nu4z
    @user-tu2rk6nu4z Місяць тому

    Except metal fuses in space

  • @rtpfixit
    @rtpfixit 3 місяці тому

    We are so far from rudimentary understanding of consciousness, or how the brain works, or how to "program" even the few full scale simulations we have ever done. I agree with the one scientist who says the ones and zeros guy is just wasting money.

  • @stevenbaker436
    @stevenbaker436 7 місяців тому

    But how?

  • @user-hx5lz4qr1c
    @user-hx5lz4qr1c 17 днів тому

    then again......maybe time is just a pine-apple 🍍🍍

  • @tanyamarie987
    @tanyamarie987 6 місяців тому

    'time is different for different observers'
    diz was awesomazingly fascinatin', bbc earth lab.
    thank you.
    😍😘🤩
    do ye kno wat came before da big bang, jellybean?????
    itz called 'da big fart' released by me.
    you're all welcome fo dat priceless knowledge.
    💟🤣🤭💎🌟🤯💖

  • @pavelsmith2267
    @pavelsmith2267 8 місяців тому

    YOU HAVE A POLLUTED MIND

  • @denalozecon9074
    @denalozecon9074 7 місяців тому

    I was at Starbucks. A guy asked me to buy him coffee.
    He seemed to be about 20 years old. We talked about a couple things then he told me he himself had figured out the Theory Of Everything! He had a notebook with at least ten pages describing his theory, but weirdly only allowed me to look at one page. He gave me his email. I emailed him saying that even if he had figured out the Unification of Quantum Physics and Gravity for this Universe...that would not be proof he understood all of existence. This Universe might be average or might be unusual, but no way for Humans to answer that. If this Universe is one part in a trillion trillion trillion of all that exists? Other locations would be undetectable to us even if our civilization lasted billions of years. Anyway back to the genius who figured out the Theory of Everything before he could drink alcohol? Seemed to be poor and homeless...so I was definitely skeptical of his claim.

    • @Beelzebubba1983
      @Beelzebubba1983 3 місяці тому

      I'm sceptical you met this 20 something homeless. 20 something Starbucks loiterers are not homeless... Just dull

    • @denalozecon9074
      @denalozecon9074 3 місяці тому

      @@Beelzebubba1983 A different guy I met, also in his twenties; middle class background and supposedly still on good terms with his parents. So he was doing a Hitch Hiking Tour of any parts of the USA that he felt like. Had a guitar so he claimed to seek places to play that on his low budget tourism. That is of course dangerous as a way to be a tourist, but there are people who do have plenty of money...that choose to be minimalist travelers just camping wherever they feel like because it is genuine. So the guy around 20 that claimed to have invented a Theory of Everything? He was real, he could have been dirt poor for real or like the guitar guy having money but doing ultra low budget travel for his own reasons. Regardless of if his theory was valid or not; he refused to describe it in any detail or allow me to see his writing after making that claim. So I did not dismiss his claim as not possible, but I feel I was reasonably skeptical of such a large claim...combined with absolute refusal to provide any verbal or written evidence. I am fairly smart, and talking to him he did not seem to be as smart as me...this is not me bragging BTW, just I know there are millions of people smarter than me and he was not impressing me with anything he said. I first heard of CTMU and Langen just recently; my first impression is it might be 'feel good philosophical solipsism with no practical use' BUT I do think he is much smarter than me, so I intend to buy all his books and try to understand them. IE I did not dismiss CTMU and will try to understand what he describes.

  • @geofflewis8599
    @geofflewis8599 8 місяців тому +1

    ..time requires consciousness

    • @mrxmry3264
      @mrxmry3264 8 місяців тому

      i think you got that backwards.

  • @Chris.Davies
    @Chris.Davies 8 місяців тому

    4:15 - "breakthough". Really, BBC? **sigh**
    If there is one thing we can say for sure, it's that gravity isn't altered by how fast something rotates. That is merely the gyroscope effect, which freaks people out because gyroscopes LOOK like they defy gravity, when they do not.
    I can easily understand someone working on antigravity, and I can understand if they are deluded into thinking they're onto something.
    What is so hilarious about all such claims of anti-gravity is this question: WHERE ARE ALL THE GRAVITY-DEFYING THINGS?
    Occam's Razor applies here - just as with UAPs, and ghosts.
    10:40 - What do we want? TIME TRAVEL!!
    When do we want it? THAT'S IRRELEVANT!! 😛
    What's absolutely terrible, is that not only do we not know what time is, we don't even know how to measure it!
    Because we use the speed of light to define time.
    And we use time to define the speed of light.
    Chew on that fact for a moment or two...
    If your head doesn't hurt now, then you didn't really think about it.

  • @Stringsmith
    @Stringsmith 8 місяців тому +1

    Don't miss part 2 of this series, titled "A machine that makes Doritos a healthy snack, another machine that makes root canals fun, and a third machine that makes fat women sexy."

  • @walkabout16
    @walkabout16 8 місяців тому +1

    In the realm of science, where minds dare to roam,
    The BBC Earth Lab, a place to call home.
    For 40 minutes, a journey so grand,
    Exploring weird theories in this wondrous land.
    From the multiverse's cosmic embrace,
    To the mysteries of time, in a curious chase.
    Black holes that devour, and parallel skies,
    In the realm of weird science, where knowledge defies.
    Quantum entanglement, where particles dance,
    Invisible forces, a bizarre cosmic trance.
    From wormholes to strings, and dark matter's shroud,
    In this series, strange theories are avowed.
    Through the eyes of experts, they're unraveled and spun,
    Intriguing and odd, yet under the sun.
    We venture with wonder, and questions untamed,
    In the quest for understanding, where science is named.
    So, for 40 minutes, our minds are set free,
    In the world of weird science, a wondrous decree.
    The BBC Earth Lab, where knowledge takes flight,
    A journey through mysteries, in the realm of the light.

    • @harshaasiwal2540
      @harshaasiwal2540 8 місяців тому +1

      this is amazing!🤯

    • @AbAb-th5qe
      @AbAb-th5qe 7 місяців тому

      You like messing with chatGPT then?

  • @pavelsmith2267
    @pavelsmith2267 8 місяців тому

    Fossil fuels and science.
    Military science.
    Defense contracting .
    Everything we do, in name of progress.
    "If I were holding, uhm, fifty hostages. What would their names be?"
    We are living thriugh multiple waves of crazed hysteria. Come up with fifty names and I will supply the necessary intelligence for a new American Agenda.

  • @ogpeekhal
    @ogpeekhal 7 місяців тому

    I thought for sure, they wouldve gotten a host without a lisp

  • @keithmetcalf5548
    @keithmetcalf5548 8 місяців тому

    God youre so Adorable! Thanks for the Fun facts! ❤️✨

  • @georgeflitzer7160
    @georgeflitzer7160 8 місяців тому

    This will destroy spirituality in humans

  • @bernicemarie7243
    @bernicemarie7243 8 місяців тому +1

    What if there is a type 4? A civilization that can harness the energy but understands they shouldnt and dont because it disrupts the balance of the universes.

    • @D0nlyJuan
      @D0nlyJuan 8 місяців тому +1

      Why do you say there's a balance in the universe? Most of our universe is missing...

    • @SorayaAzizSouleymane
      @SorayaAzizSouleymane 8 місяців тому +1

      I always fantasize about ancient civilizations here on earth discovering that and deliberately deciding to go back to the "old way" of living, they buried all the knowledge and that was it. It all happened before the Younger Dryas, of course.

    • @bernicemarie7243
      @bernicemarie7243 8 місяців тому

      A void is still a thing. Just one that isn't always apreciated. Also universes; plural.

    • @seditt5146
      @seditt5146 8 місяців тому

      universe, singular, there is no multiverse that is simply nonsense and pseudoscience. @@bernicemarie7243

  • @markedis5902
    @markedis5902 8 місяців тому

    The Industrial Revolution is where it all went wrong

  • @targuscinco
    @targuscinco 7 місяців тому

    Id fly to the end of all of mankind. And there id find a brother of mine.

  • @martinalladin8981
    @martinalladin8981 8 місяців тому

    Pay BBC thanks for getting a little science n between the ads

  • @deepdrag8131
    @deepdrag8131 7 місяців тому

    These people are so delusional. It’s really sad.

  • @peace_be_with_you_in_all_ways
    @peace_be_with_you_in_all_ways 8 місяців тому

    There is a section of this upload that mentions time travel ..... and the question what is TIME ? is posed .... The answer is in my mind easy ...
    TIME IS A CONSTRUCT OF MAN ....IN THE ENDEAVOUR OF MESSURING A MOMENT ... THE MOVEMENT OF OF ONE MOMENT TO ANOTHER .
    Therefore in my mind Time did not exist until we created the word .... time is a figment of Ours not Hours ..... there for the phrase TIME TRAVEL Is not possible we must remove the man made concept ( time ) only when this happens will we gat closer to the ability to move from the moment to the future or the past ...... TIME IS A MAN MADE CONCEPT .... MOTION is not FORWARD is not BACKWARDS is not FUTURE is not PAST is not ..... these may be words of man however their concepts are not .....

  • @JayToGo
    @JayToGo 8 місяців тому +1

    Seriously?

  • @philipmcdonagh1094
    @philipmcdonagh1094 8 місяців тому +1

    If they suck everything out of that chamber the chamber itself will have to go otherwise you'll be left with space witch can hardly be called nothing. For I don't know how long they have been shoving the big bang down or throats, now their saying they got it wrong, its a big bounce with a brane or two thrown in to make it sound better. I've come to the conclusion these guys haven't a clue what their talking about. We'll never know and I don't think were meant to know, if we knew everything that would be the end. Now I think I'll crawl back under my rock for another few thousand years.

    • @NathanBoardman19
      @NathanBoardman19 8 місяців тому

      Science does not claim to have the answer... The big bang was the best model that fits with calculations and observations pertaining to the current state of the universe. Scientist know that there are holes in several theories, take black energy and black matter as an example. When scientist calculated the observable masses and forces the results did not match the actual current state of universe, thus black matter and black energy was added to the equation in order to garner results that reflected our universe as we currently know it. I suppose you can think of black matter and black energy as a place holder until scientist discover the mass and forces which fits their calculations. So some scientists are working hard to prove that the math is correct by focusing their time into detecting these things, whilst simultaneously some other scientists are working on alternative hypothesis. The same is true for the big bang, it's just the best model that fits observations and calculations. It may not be the correct theory but it can stay there until science either confirms the idea or comes up with a better model.
      May I also add a personal opinion... Thinking that "we are not meant to know" and "if we knew every thing that would be the end" is quite a sad notion and somewhat defeatist. I prefer to believe that we are meant to probe and study the universe in order to understand how this all came to be. After all we (as well as everything we know of) are all made up of the same fundamental particles which was created at the birth of the universe, so we (humans) are literally the universe becoming conscious enough to study and under its self.

  • @georgeflitzer7160
    @georgeflitzer7160 8 місяців тому

    They will destroy human beings

  • @khasmir666
    @khasmir666 8 місяців тому

    1:45 he would have had to come up with some actual concepts for the propulsion system, not some stupid artist renderings... I'm out

  • @anirbanbhattacharya2874
    @anirbanbhattacharya2874 4 місяці тому

    This is what you may call science porn !

  • @grego15
    @grego15 8 місяців тому

    I don't like the fact that I can't see the bridge of her nose. It's like watching a 50's movie where defocus/soften a females face.

  • @gregdrmax
    @gregdrmax 4 місяці тому

    Can anyone tell me...where the heck did the "science" tab disappear to at the top of the home page? Why would it have been taken away? Doing a search for something science related will find any article...where it used to reside, but nothing current. The "earth" tab doesn't pull science articles. Is this some green earth woke maneuver?

  • @danisyx5804
    @danisyx5804 8 місяців тому

    Hooray, the same tire definitions and nonsense passing as new ideas

  • @Bruce1983
    @Bruce1983 8 місяців тому +1

    Crap

  • @ernestweaver9720
    @ernestweaver9720 8 місяців тому

    The quantum computer is the only possible way to map the brain.
    The problem is we all have a Soul.
    I do not believe that can be recorded. How all of this meaning the Entire Universe all the way down to a Plank length is undoubtedly inconceivable. Another words Why and How did we became what we are. If you have this answer please tell me because I myself have No Clue.
    This is a little off from the subject but take a look at the Viewable Universe and a single brain cell and let me know your thoughts.

  • @kevinmarleyRevolution777
    @kevinmarleyRevolution777 8 місяців тому

    You're very very cute? Single???? LOL

  • @Unreallarrysniper
    @Unreallarrysniper 7 місяців тому

    Time ryns both directions,at sametime,why u see the blackholes shooting the energy beams out in the far lyrs,is pos matter is in future wen matter is recombinated back to its dense neutron starlike mass soinning with dark massless negative matter around it,magnetic feild is,wat allows both to be in close contact,as the pos matter magnetic feild dripped,neg matter will repulse away first to opaque gain negative masslessness thus repulsive gravity,then to transparent gainning masslessness that makes it test as nothing,but it has repulsive so wen matter gets close space bends away,einstein aint even close,as gas collected it collapsed space moved inward til all supermassive met at internal centre,there pos matter recombines it is what flooded out to be the arms,as the neutronstarlike mass soins,the magnetic feild that is the arms spins,they pull pos matter to the arms holding it there ,giving it spin to.bent space is space being pulled inward and space bend away .its negarive matter so diluted it dont test as anything its why pos matter can reside near negative,time in far lyrs isnt past,space started at its largest to end up at smallest to reinflate in 45 blyr cycles,we see inflation because of our flow of time is opposite,space is deflating,but looks to inflate faster faster because of its deflating as u go farther looks,faster and faster,it isnt any horizen but deflated back to a less massless state,theres 13.6 bys left to liveable time,and why u see blackhokes shooting the gamma rays in far space is its acrualky at end of space as deflation is happening the energy is exspelled from the blackholes,the matter inside is foreward time,but space starts in its biggest then deflates,if we go from now to futre space starts why u see huge galaxies and formes stars is its future wen space has eaten most pos matter and has deflated as pos matter is ingested space deflates accordingly,im right i know i am.