The X Pro is $450 street price and open emitter. My only question for sig is why even bring this to market when it compromises the one feature people wanted from the mil spec optic?
I was thinking the exact same thing. If this was priced at $300-$350, it would put it in the Holosun 507K category of red dots, but I'm not gonna pay $450 for an open emitter EDC dot
Where did you get $450 street? It’s MSRP is $460. $409 MSRP for the compact. I suspect it may dip under $400 possibly $350 after it’s been out a while.
@@ghostx697 They claimed its price was originally $589 which is a lie. On SIGs website MSRP is $459 and $409. I hate when companies put fake prices to make it seem like a good deal when they're just charging you full price. I expect in time we'll see it drop to $350ish.
If i had to guess, it's because they changed the footprint. The screws where the DPP are make it really difficult to do a sealed optic. Huge bummer but it's the only explanation that makes sense, even the Romeo 2 had to do a special setup to convert to enclosed after being mounted.
@@SolDarkside coulda made the print something else like an acro. I mean they adopted their other competitors print (Leupold). They would've sold boatloads of them
95% of the people whining that it's not enclosed will LITERALLY only be using it on a sunny range day or otherwise have it completely covered by clothing. I'm seeing them for $350ish online. Thats not bad. I've had an RMR on my duty gun for 6 years, constantly getting rained and snowed on and I've never had an issue with it not being enclosed. I love the low co-witness back up irons. The fiber optic sights look legit. Looks perfect for any of those small guns that have the rear sight attached to the optic cut cover.
True, most of us will hopefully only ever be shooting anything we own on a range. But consumers want what they want, same way a lot of lifted pickup truck owners just drive to the office and grocery store. I want the M17 optic on my M18 for no reason other than it looks sleaker than the romeo X
@lucasblanchard47 But don't you worry, they'll release backwards compatible slides. So on top of the $800 I've seen the Romeo M17 go for, you can also spend another $3-400 on a slide that the sight will actually work on.
NOT ENCLOSED. NOT ENCLOSED. NOT ENCLOSED. If theres anything you need to know about it. It's that right there. Thanks Sig, for not giving us the real version of the M17.
They’re selling the regular one too. It’s just made only for M17 M18 pistols. Can’t mount it to anything else, even a p320. This is there option for any gun I guess. The regular one should be in stores I hear
My Romeo Zero Elite battery dies in 3 weeks. I tested it multiple ways, picking the pistol up 1-2 times a day all the way to just sitting on a shelf for 3 weeks and it always died. Sig customer service told me it was "operating correctly" and to simply adjust the intensity of the red dot. So I did that and adjusted it all the way down to where I could just barely make it out...set it on a shelf and didn't touch it for 3 weeks....picked it up and it was dead. And yes, I did test it to ensure the MOTAC was working correctly.
I’m interested in the compact version but waiting for reviews and to see if it’s enclosed which I’m assuming it’s not due to not being mentioned in the video
@@RocksNRuts4 if as a full grown adult, you can't tell what an enclosed emitter looks like vs an open one, you should be mentally adjudicated. It doesn't require any knowledge. It requires eyes. I can't believe you even are attempting to justify this level of stupidity. What are you a special education teacher? Holy.....
@CrystalSnake100 I understand, but for me personally, whatever product that's out there that gives me the best bang for my buck while also continuing to innovated and is reliable while also adding new products over the competition I will go to them. Sig dropped the ball on this one. trijicon is just stationary with the rmr and sro, but I understand the China Point Usa manufacturers need to do a little better, especially for the price
I would only buy this if it were sealed, but I really want a Romeo M17 and slide. Why on earth does the P320 m17 slide need to be so unobtanium that you made a different sight?
I am glad to see this as I would prefer to buy optics that are made someplace other than China. However, I will have to wait for the closed emitter, green version.
I think you may be better off with the red version, unless you have a severe astigmatism. Battery drain on a red led is much lower than that drawn by a green led to achieve the same brightness. I like having a green laser or laser/flashlight like the Streamlight and a red dot.
@@jediscubaI have always preferred green over than red ever since trijicon started doing it long ago. As far as battery life, what I'm hearing from the manufacturers is just the opposite; Holosun and others have stated that green takes a bit less energy to reach the same intensity as red. When you're getting battery life ratings in the 50k + hour range though, it doesn't really matter much.
@@eastcoastcrackayeah, as soon as I saw a packaging on any sig or other optics that said "assembled in..." vs "made in...", The legal section of my brain picked up on it. I don't mind if it's Japanese or German or even from the Philippines, I'm cool with it. As long as it's not China. The way things are though, I understand that having absolutely no Chinese parts is nearly impossible. At least some of the work is done in the States.
@@2f5shooterthere was an article talking about the SIG Romeo 4T claiming it used zero Chinese parts and parts used were US and Japanese. Garand thumb said in the comments in one of his videos the 8T was American made with a Japanese Circuit board and S. Korean Emitter. Other sources from people that said they worked for SIG said the the US line are shooting for govt contracts and are required to be as American made as possible and anything that can’t be sourced from the US has to come from an ally country so Japan, S. Korea and possibly Germany (I’ve heard they used German and Japanese glass at different times.) It seems it’s just as American made as a Trijicon. The difference I’ve heard is what states they’re made in. Oregon (where the SIGs are made) have strict laws regarding what can be labeled Made in USA. Trijicon is made in Michigan and I believe their laws have a little more leeway. Trijicon red electro optics are not 100% US made either but source what they can from the US. This is just what I’ve gathered with a bit of online research so feel free to research yourself. You just have to sift through a lot of people regurgitating the “rebranded Holosun” lies from keyboard warriors.
It looks like it is sealed, but even after watching the video and looking at the pics on their website, I still can't really tell if it is. They say it's "inspired" by the Romeo M17 so I'm guessing it is. But I'll wait to see somebody review it first. If it is then I'm going to grab one once it's in stock and FDE.
200$ is the difference from a comparable holosun to this. Or you can get a closed emitter holosun for the same price. Bring the price down to 250 and we can talk sig.
Your not going to get an American built optic for the price of a Chinese built optic. If price is more important than anything go buy the Chinese optic. I prefer to spend a bit more to support the US over China when I can.
You're trying to convince us to get this instead of a Holosun EPS or 509T. So yes, this should've been a closed emitter! As is, in this price range, I'd still choose a closed emitter instead of an open emitter.
I wanna hate them because they're not enclosed and it's the year 2023...however they look like tough optics, the MSRP is reasonable, and they don't require tall iron sights to cowitness. I'm going to actually have to see one in person before I make up my mind on these. But SIG, these really should have been closed emitter optics.....
Still trying to wrap my head around the demand for "closed emitters" as the open emitters have performed just amazingly well on duty guns for many years. Everyone for some reason think they will be going into combat in austere conditions and think their home defense or self-defense gun might fall into a huge mud puddle. Truth is that open emitters are extremely capable and perform just fine in just about any condition you could possibly run into.
I think the 365 sized one is fine as Ccw weapons aren’t really exposed to any harsh conditions and are usually covered/concealed. The larger one should be enclosed imo and SIG is apparently working on an enclosed Romeo X along with green dot options.
@8654ZuluFoxtrot For competition, fun, and CCW guns it's not a big deal if something isn't a closed emitter. For a duty pistol or hard use defensive pistol that's going to be living in an OWB holster, not having to worry about stuff blocking the emitter is a way bigger deal. I have a few open emitter optics, and I'm in no hurry to replace any of them because they work fine. However, Sig is marketing these as "duty" optics and their housings are big enough it shouldn't have been an issue enclosing the emitter. If Holosun can do it with the EPS family, Sig has no excuses. That's why I'm saying these really should have been closed emitter.
@@MajorHattery I fully understand that logic and I'm not arguing that point at all. My point is that the vast majority of people posting here and demanding a closed emitter are not law enforcement using their pistols for Duty Carry. I'm retired from 30+ yrs of military spec ops and both local and federal law enforcement and I currently run a shooting school. I know for a fact that any decent sized police or sheriff's department is not going to allow it's officers to just slap on any 'ole optic onto their Duty guns. So, my point is that this noise about open emitters is just that...noise from people who will never "need" what a closed emitter is designed for.
I've beat the shit outta my duty gun with an open emitter for last 5 years and the armchair range warriors are worried about closed emitters... as nice as they are most range cowboys will never push limits with their platform... agree with you! @@8654ZuluFoxtrot
was this thing cracked at 1:03 in the lower right had corner? I don't mind that it's an open emitter, been using open emitters for the last 10 years and haven't had an issue once with either EDCing it, or "larping" and rolling around in the dirt so that doesn't bother me so much. I dig that it has a built in rear sight that's kind of cool. It does look holosunish hopefully more durable than holosun.
Open emitter, same price as the RMR.. Not sure what you were going for here. It fascinates me how tone deaf Sig is when it comes to optics. This design would have been a good contender if it were a closed emitter. In its current configuration it’s not even worth testing.
I’m gonna say something wild, I don’t need a closed emitter optic..: I also don’t care about iron sights. Haven’t had to use them in over a decade. Can someone make a tube style optic that is like, t2 size or smaller that has shake awake multiple reticles and looks good under nods? I’ll buy it (not the aimpoint acro either I like the motac and multiple reticles) this Romeo x is probably good though if it drops closer to 300 I’ll grab one
Nothing that Sig does makes any sense. We’ve all been waiting for the Romeo M17 to be released for the non-military and non-commemorative versions in the same Coyote/FDE color to match our M17s and M18s and once we heard them say at Shot Show that a similar version would be released for all of the P365 line up as well, we’ve been waiting for that too. Why did they make the Romeo X different than the Romeo M17 and why is it only available in black? It’s all so annoying. We want it to match our Coyote/FDE and NRA editions. Too much waiting for things that should’ve been released initially.
Great post from above comments...educate yourself! "There was an article talking about the SIG Romeo 4T claiming it used zero Chinese parts and parts used were US and Japanese. Garand thumb said in the comments in one of his videos the 8T was American made with a Japanese Circuit board and S. Korean Emitter. Other sources from people that said they worked for SIG said the the US line are shooting for govt contracts and are required to be as American made as possible and anything that can’t be sourced from the US has to come from an ally country so Japan, S. Korea and possibly Germany (I’ve heard they used German and Japanese glass at different times.) It seems it’s just as American made as a Trijicon. The difference I’ve heard is what states they’re made in. Oregon (where the SIGs are made) have strict laws regarding what can be labeled Made in USA. Trijicon is made in Michigan and I believe their laws have a little more leeway. Trijicon red electro optics are not 100% US made either but source what they can from the US. This is just what I’ve gathered with a bit of online research so feel free to research yourself. You just have to sift through a lot of people regurgitating the “rebranded Holosun” lies from keyboard warriors."
Can I exchange the absolutely HORRID Romeo Zero Elite optic I just got last year for one of these? Oh wait, is the battery life better than the Romeo Zero Elite? I was getting 3 weeks of battery life, while not in use mind you.....3 weeks! Not acceptable and I was told by your techs when I called customer service that it was "operating correctly". How can 3 weeks of battery life while sitting on a shelf "operating correctly"? I've been a HUGE supporter of Sig over my 30yrs of professional shooting. I own many Sig pistols and several Sig optics, all of which are excellent, until you get to the Romeo Zero line. I understand mistakes are made sometimes with products, but to not admit to those mistakes and then to not take care of your customers after it's very obvious there is a problem?! C'mon Sig, you can do better than that!
Sig saw the EOtech EFLX and thought let's be marginally better than that and call it a day. sad that holosun is more innovative than sig at this point.
The X Pro is $450 street price and open emitter.
My only question for sig is why even bring this to market when it compromises the one feature people wanted from the mil spec optic?
I was thinking the exact same thing. If this was priced at $300-$350, it would put it in the Holosun 507K category of red dots, but I'm not gonna pay $450 for an open emitter EDC dot
Where did you get $450 street? It’s MSRP is $460. $409 MSRP for the compact. I suspect it may dip under $400 possibly $350 after it’s been out a while.
@@Berserkable gunmag warehouse has the pro listed for $450 and the compact at $399.
@@ghostx697 They claimed its price was originally $589 which is a lie. On SIGs website MSRP is $459 and $409. I hate when companies put fake prices to make it seem like a good deal when they're just charging you full price. I expect in time we'll see it drop to $350ish.
i think it’s because they are coming out with an m17 design to seamlessly fit numerous pistol
You almost had it right. Why is it not sealed like the M17 option?
If i had to guess, it's because they changed the footprint. The screws where the DPP are make it really difficult to do a sealed optic. Huge bummer but it's the only explanation that makes sense, even the Romeo 2 had to do a special setup to convert to enclosed after being mounted.
@@SolDarkside coulda made the print something else like an acro. I mean they adopted their other competitors print (Leupold).
They would've sold boatloads of them
@SolDarkside it doesn't make sense because holosun can do it with the eps and scs-320...
Not enclosed ? Big fail
@@Andy-ot8cuexactly. Holosun has shown the way with the SCS320 and EPS series. Anything less is a failure.
95% of the people whining that it's not enclosed will LITERALLY only be using it on a sunny range day or otherwise have it completely covered by clothing. I'm seeing them for $350ish online. Thats not bad. I've had an RMR on my duty gun for 6 years, constantly getting rained and snowed on and I've never had an issue with it not being enclosed. I love the low co-witness back up irons. The fiber optic sights look legit. Looks perfect for any of those small guns that have the rear sight attached to the optic cut cover.
True, most of us will hopefully only ever be shooting anything we own on a range. But consumers want what they want, same way a lot of lifted pickup truck owners just drive to the office and grocery store. I want the M17 optic on my M18 for no reason other than it looks sleaker than the romeo X
Now make an M17 sight for the civilian M17/18 models.
No, spend $4,000 instead
It should be native fit isn’t it?
@@Gen3tx sadly, the M17 optic only fits the actual “military” or “military commemorative” models. Not the standard M17 or P320 models.
@lucasblanchard47 But don't you worry, they'll release backwards compatible slides. So on top of the $800 I've seen the Romeo M17 go for, you can also spend another $3-400 on a slide that the sight will actually work on.
NOT ENCLOSED. NOT ENCLOSED. NOT ENCLOSED.
If theres anything you need to know about it. It's that right there.
Thanks Sig, for not giving us the real version of the M17.
They’re selling the regular one too. It’s just made only for M17 M18 pistols. Can’t mount it to anything else, even a p320. This is there option for any gun I guess. The regular one should be in stores I hear
450 for a non closed emitter. Holosun still has you beat.
I thought it was closed emitter. That looks like closed. Seems like Holosun beat by design and price.
$450 with an open emitter? Really shit the bed on that one… anyways, back to the Holosun EPS series.
It's the same price as an RMR and doesn't have Chinese electronics so it's open for more military contracts.
Same eps compact smhhh
It need to be in FDE an sealed like the M17 sight.😮
Sig Sauer Romeo X. Yes please.
Nice Speedy (Omega Speedmaster) shot!!!!
i hope battery works better than the "10 years" on the Romeo Zero .. i've had it for less than a year and already had the sight die on me 3 times
My Romeo Zero Elite battery dies in 3 weeks. I tested it multiple ways, picking the pistol up 1-2 times a day all the way to just sitting on a shelf for 3 weeks and it always died. Sig customer service told me it was "operating correctly" and to simply adjust the intensity of the red dot. So I did that and adjusted it all the way down to where I could just barely make it out...set it on a shelf and didn't touch it for 3 weeks....picked it up and it was dead. And yes, I did test it to ensure the MOTAC was working correctly.
I guess this is why they made sure this new one had a lowered dack do u can co whiteness with stock iron sights on ur gun.
@@akui88 lol yup
lol same here bro, im pissed, i told sig n they didnt giv a sht, so im done with sig
I’m interested in the compact version but waiting for reviews and to see if it’s enclosed which I’m assuming it’s not due to not being mentioned in the video
The fact that you can see it's not didn't tip you off? 🤣
@@maximusjoseppi5904 maybe he doesnt know all like u....chill out
@@RocksNRuts4 again..... You're watching the video. Does he have eyes? Then he knows it's not enclosed. Holy dumb
@@maximusjoseppi5904 again, he may not know how closed looks, u take the time to insult ppl, rather than nicely teach him, holy sad
@@RocksNRuts4 if as a full grown adult, you can't tell what an enclosed emitter looks like vs an open one, you should be mentally adjudicated. It doesn't require any knowledge. It requires eyes.
I can't believe you even are attempting to justify this level of stupidity. What are you a special education teacher? Holy.....
Pretty expensive for an open emitter.
typical sig, the brand for the 3%ers
Said nobody ever when buying an rmr.... goh
Seems like "someone" has been looking very carefully at the Holosun 507K X2 - same features but the Sig is a lot ore expensive.👽
They always been more expensive. I hate how others company can make the same thing but cheaper but if it's made in the USA it's two times more
Yeah but... China.
@CrystalSnake100 I understand, but for me personally, whatever product that's out there that gives me the best bang for my buck while also continuing to innovated and is reliable while also adding new products over the competition I will go to them. Sig dropped the ball on this one. trijicon is just stationary with the rmr and sro, but I understand the China Point
Usa manufacturers need to do a little better, especially for the price
𝗈𝗋𝖾？
Looks like you just ripped off the holosun 508.. should have ripped off the 509 instead, you're already behind the 8 ball
Whats going on with the m17 red dot for civilians?
I would only buy this if it were sealed, but I really want a Romeo M17 and slide.
Why on earth does the P320 m17 slide need to be so unobtanium that you made a different sight?
So no solar? and a huge Trijicon price. No thanks Sig.. Hard pass. Maybe you need to pouch some holosun employees to get it right,
I am glad to see this as I would prefer to buy optics that are made someplace other than China. However, I will have to wait for the closed emitter, green version.
I think you may be better off with the red version, unless you have a severe astigmatism. Battery drain on a red led is much lower than that drawn by a green led to achieve the same brightness. I like having a green laser or laser/flashlight like the Streamlight and a red dot.
They are just designed and assembled here.
No one really knows where the hardware is from.
@@jediscubaI have always preferred green over than red ever since trijicon started doing it long ago. As far as battery life, what I'm hearing from the manufacturers is just the opposite; Holosun and others have stated that green takes a bit less energy to reach the same intensity as red. When you're getting battery life ratings in the 50k + hour range though, it doesn't really matter much.
@@eastcoastcrackayeah, as soon as I saw a packaging on any sig or other optics that said "assembled in..." vs "made in...", The legal section of my brain picked up on it. I don't mind if it's Japanese or German or even from the Philippines, I'm cool with it. As long as it's not China. The way things are though, I understand that having absolutely no Chinese parts is nearly impossible. At least some of the work is done in the States.
@@2f5shooterthere was an article talking about the SIG Romeo 4T claiming it used zero Chinese parts and parts used were US and Japanese. Garand thumb said in the comments in one of his videos the 8T was American made with a Japanese Circuit board and S. Korean Emitter. Other sources from people that said they worked for SIG said the the US line are shooting for govt contracts and are required to be as American made as possible and anything that can’t be sourced from the US has to come from an ally country so Japan, S. Korea and possibly Germany (I’ve heard they used German and Japanese glass at different times.) It seems it’s just as American made as a Trijicon. The difference I’ve heard is what states they’re made in. Oregon (where the SIGs are made) have strict laws regarding what can be labeled Made in USA. Trijicon is made in Michigan and I believe their laws have a little more leeway. Trijicon red electro optics are not 100% US made either but source what they can from the US. This is just what I’ve gathered with a bit of online research so feel free to research yourself. You just have to sift through a lot of people regurgitating the “rebranded Holosun” lies from keyboard warriors.
I think I’m gonna have to get this for my X macro!
No enclosed emitter?!?!?!?!?!?!? Missed the mark with that omission. Guess I'll have to look at other options. Come on, Sig. You can do better.
Need a FDE or Coyote Brown color and sealed like the Romeo m17.
I can't tell. Is this an enclosed emitter? If it is, I'll look at it. If it's not, it's no different than Holosun to me.
But holosun has a sealed option ..
It looks like it is sealed, but even after watching the video and looking at the pics on their website, I still can't really tell if it is. They say it's "inspired" by the Romeo M17 so I'm guessing it is. But I'll wait to see somebody review it first. If it is then I'm going to grab one once it's in stock and FDE.
200$ is the difference from a comparable holosun to this. Or you can get a closed emitter holosun for the same price. Bring the price down to 250 and we can talk sig.
*It looks well-designed, well-built, like dreamy. Hopefully, the price will be reasonable.*
$460.00
@@JohnDoe-zg6fn that's why Holosun is "killing it!"
@@JohnDoe-zg6fn I only paid $429.00 for my P365 new.
$409 for compact $459 for pro. Open emitter, yh it's going to have to be a pass for me. EPS carry still the better option.
Your not going to get an American built optic for the price of a Chinese built optic. If price is more important than anything go buy the Chinese optic. I prefer to spend a bit more to support the US over China when I can.
Amazing .. proud of you guys
Not enclosed! 😱
You're trying to convince us to get this instead of a Holosun EPS or 509T. So yes, this should've been a closed emitter!
As is, in this price range, I'd still choose a closed emitter instead of an open emitter.
I wish it was sealed.
I wanna hate them because they're not enclosed and it's the year 2023...however they look like tough optics, the MSRP is reasonable, and they don't require tall iron sights to cowitness. I'm going to actually have to see one in person before I make up my mind on these. But SIG, these really should have been closed emitter optics.....
Still trying to wrap my head around the demand for "closed emitters" as the open emitters have performed just amazingly well on duty guns for many years. Everyone for some reason think they will be going into combat in austere conditions and think their home defense or self-defense gun might fall into a huge mud puddle. Truth is that open emitters are extremely capable and perform just fine in just about any condition you could possibly run into.
I think the 365 sized one is fine as Ccw weapons aren’t really exposed to any harsh conditions and are usually covered/concealed. The larger one should be enclosed imo and SIG is apparently working on an enclosed Romeo X along with green dot options.
@8654ZuluFoxtrot For competition, fun, and CCW guns it's not a big deal if something isn't a closed emitter. For a duty pistol or hard use defensive pistol that's going to be living in an OWB holster, not having to worry about stuff blocking the emitter is a way bigger deal. I have a few open emitter optics, and I'm in no hurry to replace any of them because they work fine.
However, Sig is marketing these as "duty" optics and their housings are big enough it shouldn't have been an issue enclosing the emitter. If Holosun can do it with the EPS family, Sig has no excuses. That's why I'm saying these really should have been closed emitter.
@@MajorHattery I fully understand that logic and I'm not arguing that point at all. My point is that the vast majority of people posting here and demanding a closed emitter are not law enforcement using their pistols for Duty Carry. I'm retired from 30+ yrs of military spec ops and both local and federal law enforcement and I currently run a shooting school. I know for a fact that any decent sized police or sheriff's department is not going to allow it's officers to just slap on any 'ole optic onto their Duty guns. So, my point is that this noise about open emitters is just that...noise from people who will never "need" what a closed emitter is designed for.
I've beat the shit outta my duty gun with an open emitter for last 5 years and the armchair range warriors are worried about closed emitters... as nice as they are most range cowboys will never push limits with their platform... agree with you! @@8654ZuluFoxtrot
When will you come out with an FDE color version?
I am gonna try the XC on my new FN reflex i just purchased. Gonna put a 399$ optic on my new 549$ gun…
Is it rated for use on the X-ten?
Wow it’s almost kinda like a holosun
Nice moronic statement.....let's read what another uninformed fool has written in the past and regurgitate it.
I can't wait to get mine in the mail!
was this thing cracked at 1:03 in the lower right had corner? I don't mind that it's an open emitter, been using open emitters for the last 10 years and haven't had an issue once with either EDCing it, or "larping" and rolling around in the dirt so that doesn't bother me so much. I dig that it has a built in rear sight that's kind of cool. It does look holosunish hopefully more durable than holosun.
I dont want it enclosed.. I just wished it was polymere too
I’m interested but I need some reviews first, though.
𝖴𝗇𝖽𝖾𝗋𝗌𝗍𝖺𝗇𝖽𝖺𝖻𝗅𝖾．
Is it water proof or battery sealed ??
Serious question
Will there be an option to have a green dot?
The asymmetry of having that battery cover on the side is hugely distracting.
awesome any word on fixing the berral/handguard issue with the spear ?
Luv it
why give us a 509 footprint without enclosing the emitter
Ill stick with Holosun EPS, Thanks!
𝖸𝗈𝗎’𝗋𝖾 𝖭𝗈𝗍 𝖶𝖾𝗅𝖼𝗈𝗆𝖾．
Just release more military version of m17
Holosun did this five years ago. And has moved on to better for less money.
La Romeo X compact, funciona para P320 m18 ?????
Would it fit my regular p365 ?
Why would I get one of these open emitters for nearly $500 when I can get a 509t for 400 anyday? I won’t ever even consider this optic.
Je compte bien en mêtre un sur mon M17
Send one to Aaron Cowen please
Open emitter, same price as the RMR.. Not sure what you were going for here. It fascinates me how tone deaf Sig is when it comes to optics. This design would have been a good contender if it were a closed emitter. In its current configuration it’s not even worth testing.
Rmr footprint?
DDP and rmsc
@@Jrock628 What a L
I’m gonna say something wild, I don’t need a closed emitter optic..: I also don’t care about iron sights. Haven’t had to use them in over a decade. Can someone make a tube style optic that is like, t2 size or smaller that has shake awake multiple reticles and looks good under nods? I’ll buy it (not the aimpoint acro either I like the motac and multiple reticles) this Romeo x is probably good though if it drops closer to 300 I’ll grab one
About time someone posts an intelligent comment other than "Sig missed the mark by not making this a closed emitter" uninformed comment. Thank you!
👍🏾
A really good optic 👊🏻
Compatible with the X Macro then?
Yes, Sig has a package called "El Dos Equies". XX 😬
Just kidding by the way...
Nothing that Sig does makes any sense. We’ve all been waiting for the Romeo M17 to be released for the non-military and non-commemorative versions in the same Coyote/FDE color to match our M17s and M18s and once we heard them say at Shot Show that a similar version would be released for all of the P365 line up as well, we’ve been waiting for that too. Why did they make the Romeo X different than the Romeo M17 and why is it only available in black? It’s all so annoying. We want it to match our Coyote/FDE and NRA editions. Too much waiting for things that should’ve been released initially.
Designed and assembled in USA but not made here why
Great post from above comments...educate yourself!
"There was an article talking about the SIG Romeo 4T claiming it used zero Chinese parts and parts used were US and Japanese. Garand thumb said in the comments in one of his videos the 8T was American made with a Japanese Circuit board and S. Korean Emitter. Other sources from people that said they worked for SIG said the the US line are shooting for govt contracts and are required to be as American made as possible and anything that can’t be sourced from the US has to come from an ally country so Japan, S. Korea and possibly Germany (I’ve heard they used German and Japanese glass at different times.) It seems it’s just as American made as a Trijicon. The difference I’ve heard is what states they’re made in. Oregon (where the SIGs are made) have strict laws regarding what can be labeled Made in USA. Trijicon is made in Michigan and I believe their laws have a little more leeway. Trijicon red electro optics are not 100% US made either but source what they can from the US. This is just what I’ve gathered with a bit of online research so feel free to research yourself. You just have to sift through a lot of people regurgitating the “rebranded Holosun” lies from keyboard warriors."
Can I exchange the absolutely HORRID Romeo Zero Elite optic I just got last year for one of these? Oh wait, is the battery life better than the Romeo Zero Elite? I was getting 3 weeks of battery life, while not in use mind you.....3 weeks! Not acceptable and I was told by your techs when I called customer service that it was "operating correctly". How can 3 weeks of battery life while sitting on a shelf "operating correctly"?
I've been a HUGE supporter of Sig over my 30yrs of professional shooting. I own many Sig pistols and several Sig optics, all of which are excellent, until you get to the Romeo Zero line. I understand mistakes are made sometimes with products, but to not admit to those mistakes and then to not take care of your customers after it's very obvious there is a problem?! C'mon Sig, you can do better than that!
Not enclosed, not buying.
Not enclosed ? Big fail
－𝖲𝖺𝗒𝗌 𝖳𝗁𝖾 𝖡𝗂𝗀 𝖥𝖺𝗂𝗅．
Sig saw the EOtech EFLX and thought let's be marginally better than that and call it a day. sad that holosun is more innovative than sig at this point.
Swag
So... An expensive 507k and not a better EPScarry....HARD PASS. Exactly what we did not ask for or need.
This new thing with "closed emitter" is for the people who will never really need a closed emitter.... snowflakes....
Here it is another rmsc footprint open emitter cause no one asked for it
Open emmiter is dumb
𝖫𝗂𝗄𝖾 𝖸𝗈𝗎－
@@B3auty_Th3M1dn1ghtF0x appreciate it, bud 😉
@@Andy-ot8cu 𝖸𝗈𝗎’𝗋𝖾 𝖶𝖾𝗅𝖼𝗈𝗆𝖾！👍
All the people shooting in this video don’t know how to hold a pistol. WTH
Not enclosed, bummmmmerrr dude
Open emitter, no thanks
𝖮𝗄？
over priced and not what the customers have been asking for.
𝖡𝗈𝗈𝗁𝗈𝗈．