I love this channel. I am a football fan, and I love hearing coaches talk about coverages. Maybe I even will be able to coach some day, that is my dream at this point. keep up the great work :)
Great video coach. Certainly giving me some new ideas to bounce off our staff. I sure hate leaving that single WR in man with no safety help but I think it will just be an adjustment based upon our opponent.
Coach Mac been a while since you made this video after my questions and still thank you. My solution to the single solo issue is to check the line into an odd and bump the away side end as a 3-4 olb to get a sky structure.
That will work. Usually with unconventional formations if you have an answer and take away the 2 or 3 easy things the offense wants they will get away from it.
When on offensive in the 4 by 1, I would call a double pass! QB throws to the Quad side, then throws to the solo WR on a post route, sluggo, post-corner, or corner-post. If the double pass is not open, just play it like a screen.
Hey Coach, I want to get your ideas on defending bunch formations with your quarters concepts. We have an opponent on our schedule that runs a lot of spread Wing T concepts with motion. They will use a wing formation and motion a back in that direction to get into a tight bunch set. Tougher yet, they'll also use a flanker at times with the wing (wing set + a WR to that side) and still motion the back to that side to get a quads look with basically a detached WR and a 3 man bunch inside. Their running flood concepts and spacing routes out of it. I'm in a new position and this is a team I haven't played before so my level of familiarity with them is a bit limited at this point other than seeing them in 7 on 7 this past weekend. I have some ideas but I just want to get your thoughts on it. Thanks.
3 receiver bunch sets become tough to defend with base rules. Usually you have to make some kind of check that will involve in and out bracket coverage or some type of umbrella zone coverage.
You can do it Tiger, its like anything else the more you study the better you get. Talking coverages is awesome but at the end of the day it is still blocking and tackling that wins games.
Great "chalk talk" very insightful I seen this formation last year for the first time in youth football and have been contemplating on how I would attack it or better yet defend it have you ever game planned against the "beast" formation?
At 20:09 you should bench a DT and bring in another DB to double team the solo receiver on the right (preferably like your cover 2 rules to that side of the field). Also you can send the solo DB on a corner blitz and take the new deep player and guard the solo receiver with him.
He stays under 3 unless 4 pushes wide. If 4 pushes wide then the will cut the #3 that crossed the mikes face. Palms is 3 on 2 or 4 on 3 if the back gets out
He usually relates to #3 in most of our coverages, vs 4 receiver sets if we are playing Mix coverage he cant let #4 outleverage him. The Will can now cut the new #4 if the Mike has to expand.
I love this channel. I am a football fan, and I love hearing coaches talk about coverages. Maybe I even will be able to coach some day, that is my dream at this point. keep up the great work :)
Great video coach. Certainly giving me some new ideas to bounce off our staff. I sure hate leaving that single WR in man with no safety help but I think it will just be an adjustment based upon our opponent.
Coach Mac been a while since you made this video after my questions and still thank you. My solution to the single solo issue is to check the line into an odd and bump the away side end as a 3-4 olb to get a sky structure.
That will work. Usually with unconventional formations if you have an answer and take away the 2 or 3 easy things the offense wants they will get away from it.
When on offensive in the 4 by 1, I would call a double pass! QB throws to the Quad side, then throws to the solo WR on a post route, sluggo, post-corner, or corner-post. If the double pass is not open, just play it like a screen.
Hey Coach, I want to get your ideas on defending bunch formations with your quarters concepts. We have an opponent on our schedule that runs a lot of spread Wing T concepts with motion. They will use a wing formation and motion a back in that direction to get into a tight bunch set. Tougher yet, they'll also use a flanker at times with the wing (wing set + a WR to that side) and still motion the back to that side to get a quads look with basically a detached WR and a 3 man bunch inside. Their running flood concepts and spacing routes out of it. I'm in a new position and this is a team I haven't played before so my level of familiarity with them is a bit limited at this point other than seeing them in 7 on 7 this past weekend. I have some ideas but I just want to get your thoughts on it. Thanks.
3 receiver bunch sets become tough to defend with base rules. Usually you have to make some kind of check that will involve in and out bracket coverage or some type of umbrella zone coverage.
You can do it Tiger, its like anything else the more you study the better you get. Talking coverages is awesome but at the end of the day it is still blocking and tackling that wins games.
Thanks so much Coach, wish your team the best. If you need anything from me just let me know.
Great "chalk talk" very insightful I seen this formation last year for the first time in youth football and have been contemplating on how I would attack it or better yet defend it have you ever game planned against the "beast" formation?
At 20:09 you should bench a DT and bring in another DB to double team the solo receiver on the right (preferably like your cover 2 rules to that side of the field). Also you can send the solo DB on a corner blitz and take the new deep player and guard the solo receiver with him.
Have to think about how many things you can possibly fit into a HS gameplan during practice
Always good to carry a trick play
Love the Kings Point t-shirt!
Represent
I'm new at coaching. what do you mean when you say 4 by 1.... 3 by 1 etc
Only two questions how can the Mike not let 3 cross his face but also not let 4 out leverage him? and is "Palms" 3 on 2 combo coverage?
He stays under 3 unless 4 pushes wide. If 4 pushes wide then the will cut the #3 that crossed the mikes face. Palms is 3 on 2 or 4 on 3 if the back gets out
+Thomas MacPherson right on thanks for the insight and confirmation I appreciate the share
What do you teach your Mike read after the initial pass read? Is he reading #3 to the new #4?
He usually relates to #3 in most of our coverages, vs 4 receiver sets if we are playing Mix coverage he cant let #4 outleverage him. The Will can now cut the new #4 if the Mike has to expand.
when u say cross your face what do u mean coach
Play back to the other side of the base block or out block which is technically not your gap
Sorry looking at the wrong video. It means trying to not let that receiver get across your face and into another zone.