Eris vs. Eris - RT Straßbourg - R2 - Duel Commander - EDH│MTG│bitzelberg
Вставка
- Опубліковано 25 сер 2024
- Let's go over to the 2nd round of the Relic Fest Straßbourg - the new fan-favourite Eris facing.. itself! Enjoy it ;)
You can also support us by liking 👌 and subscribing 🧡 this channel!
📜Decklists:
Eris LEFT: tinyurl.com/bi...
Eris RIGHT: tinyurl.com/bi...
Connect with us:
🐦 twitter: / bitzelberg
🔷 facebook: / bitzelberg
🟪 twitch: / bitzelberg
💠 discord: / discord
JOIN US:
☄️ / @bitzelberg
____________________________________________________
⛔️Banlist: www.mtgdc.info...
Love this tournament and love your comments guys keep the great work ! Hope to see more of this !
Thanks, we have much more to come! :D
The bullying for incorrect display of tax dice is very much appreciated. This is a civilized game for gentlemen, and we don't appreciate such provincial faux paus.
Right so!
Top commentary, keep it up guys!
Thanks, more to follow!
Eris is just too powerful for this format imo
It is indeed very good, but as I said in the video, not sure how powerful it really is!
Brainstorm in the pass
The next ban, probably
Let's see, might be the case?!
Eris can't do much against monored
I can see that!
Eris can crush it easily. Just have to open a shock effect to win enought time
Only if dont know how to play or have a trashy list.. is easy to kill mono red in eot turn 4.. already tested it
@@litonesplay I'd argue that a solid Feldon list (not those mediocre lists floating around mtgtop8) with a good pilot is very capable of beating Eris!
Great video! By the way, at 27:10, the right player was casting Eris for the 2nd time but only paid 2 mana instead of 4. Pieces of the Puzzle would not have been cast that turn. And on the Eris' 3rd cast (28:34), the right player should have paid 6 mana instead of 4 mana which was not possible as he only had 5 lands. Still, thank you for posting, it was fun to watch.
Thanks. At 27:10, the player had 5 different MV types in graveyard, so casting it for 2 is correct. Same for the third cast at 28:34 :)
@@bitzelberg I see. Crazy how it bypasses commander tax! Thanks!
@@joshfuentes3044 that has to do with the order in which additional costs and decreased costs are added.