Studying cost over global warming is amazing. If these government and companies truly cared they would have some stopped the use of fossil fuel a long time ago.
Take the green hydrogen and react it with captured CO2 making methanol. Much easier to store and transport than hydrogen and no problem running a normal jet engine on it.
factories to produce hydrogen, at all airports and train stations as well as other locations. Reminds me of Edisons first generation D.C. system were power plants would have to be installed everywhere...
Problem is, a pound of hydrogen carries less energy than a pound of pretty much anything else. It would make more sense to put feathers on your planes, and pull them off and feed them into the boiler as you fly along.
It doesnt matter because unlike kerosene almost 100% of it can be converted to energy since it doesnt produce heat. Toyota mirai have an average hydrogen consumption of about 0.74 kg per 100km. The record is 0,55 but on a smooth road without braking, changing speed and without heating the car.
Hydrogen fuel for places send like a great idea on paper. Storing more of it in the plane's tank increases its boyency instead of weighing it down because hydrogen is lighter than air. I could see it as a way of storing energy from solar panels (instead of charging a dollar battery, use the solar energy to split H2O, which can be used as fuel when sunlight is not available ; and while the hydrogen fuel is sitting in the tank, it's lowering the amount of energy required to fly the plane since it's essentially making it lighter, almost as if it was half plane, half zeppelin).
Obviously, ironing out the details is a big engineering feat that we have to overcome. In particular, if the plane has a tragically different shape, making it still aerodynamic will require quite some innovation.
@@joelbolduc3354 Hydrogen is an abysmally bad idea on paper. "and while the hydrogen fuel is sitting in the tank, it's lowering the amount of energy required to fly the plane since it's essentially making it lighter" Do you think hydrogen tanks are positively buoyant in air? Do you think filling an empty hydrogen tank with hydrogen makes it lighter? What are you talking about? Seriously, examine your thinking, there's something very, very, VERY obvious you're missing.
@@phillycheesetake That's a really CHEESY TAKE from PHILADELPHIA, Christian Bale. 😉 I'm just having fun with your username. 🤦😆 I like your point about whether Hydrogen is positively buoyant or not. 👍
Compressed and liquidfied hydrogen is absolutely not positively bouyant. If we stored hydrogen at pressure/density low enough to be bouyant in air you simply wouldnt have the energy or power required to run a fuel cell.
Most flying is not essential. Only a small portion of the population flies a lot. The solution is much less flying. Start by banning private jets and frequent flier programs.
Or we could fly less. More zoom calls.
Zoom for vacation? Doesn’t work mate
Klaus Schwab thanks you for your corporation.
98%? Do the math again
Nuclear is the answer
Studying cost over global warming is amazing. If these government and companies truly cared they would have some stopped the use of fossil fuel a long time ago.
Take the green hydrogen and react it with captured CO2 making methanol. Much easier to store and transport than hydrogen and no problem running a normal jet engine on it.
Better to just go all the way and make e-kerosene.
No
short answer no
Definitely hope that we can make it work ❤❤
Hydrogen + carbon = synthetic jet fuel
factories to produce hydrogen, at all airports and train stations as well as other locations. Reminds me of Edisons first generation D.C. system were power plants would have to be installed everywhere...
There's also a pink hydrogen, hydrogen made from nuclear energy
They say there is so much methane in the polar regions - can we use that methane?!
Problem is, a pound of hydrogen carries less energy than a pound of pretty much anything else.
It would make more sense to put feathers on your planes, and pull them off and feed them into the boiler as you fly along.
You're confusing volume with mass. Hydrogen has three times more energy per pound than kerosene
Imperial unit detected logic rejected
It doesnt matter because unlike kerosene almost 100% of it can be converted to energy since it doesnt produce heat. Toyota mirai have an average hydrogen consumption of about 0.74 kg per 100km. The record is 0,55 but on a smooth road without braking, changing speed and without heating the car.
Seems like there must be lower-hanging fruit then aviation industry to convert to a green energy source.
Yes!
Blessing for the AirFreight.
Answer for the Hyperinflation Environment.
Get ready for plug power 💪
Hydrogen combustion engine is my Dream project ❤
why? it's terribly inefficient
Hydrogen fuel for places send like a great idea on paper. Storing more of it in the plane's tank increases its boyency instead of weighing it down because hydrogen is lighter than air. I could see it as a way of storing energy from solar panels (instead of charging a dollar battery, use the solar energy to split H2O, which can be used as fuel when sunlight is not available ; and while the hydrogen fuel is sitting in the tank, it's lowering the amount of energy required to fly the plane since it's essentially making it lighter, almost as if it was half plane, half zeppelin).
Obviously, ironing out the details is a big engineering feat that we have to overcome. In particular, if the plane has a tragically different shape, making it still aerodynamic will require quite some innovation.
@@joelbolduc3354 Hydrogen is an abysmally bad idea on paper.
"and while the hydrogen fuel is sitting in the tank, it's lowering the amount of energy required to fly the plane since it's essentially making it lighter"
Do you think hydrogen tanks are positively buoyant in air? Do you think filling an empty hydrogen tank with hydrogen makes it lighter? What are you talking about? Seriously, examine your thinking, there's something very, very, VERY obvious you're missing.
@@phillycheesetake That's a really CHEESY TAKE from PHILADELPHIA, Christian Bale. 😉
I'm just having fun with your username. 🤦😆
I like your point about whether Hydrogen is positively buoyant or not. 👍
Compressed and liquidfied hydrogen is absolutely not positively bouyant. If we stored hydrogen at pressure/density low enough to be bouyant in air you simply wouldnt have the energy or power required to run a fuel cell.
Most flying is not essential. Only a small portion of the population flies a lot. The solution is much less flying. Start by banning private jets and frequent flier programs.
Diesel is better...😊
use bioethanol its cheaper and less infrastructure than hydrogen.
Yeap but bioetanol can't be easy converted in electricity
Hydrogen does 😂
Boom
Who came up these “net zero dates” when the earth is billions of years old…
🤣🤣🤣
No