Nah, they just threw stuff up the chimney to make a show, they don't make that kind of stuff in normal operation, in fact, Case, around that time was one of the first to adopt a clean steam. Imagine if they lit up the fields like this, they'd burn the crops under them.
@@jerroldkazynski5480 I could remember one time while driving through Wyoming watching a Union Pacific Big Boy running along at about 75 miles an hour for about a couple of minutes on a stretch of road right next to the railroad tracks as it's chugging along blowing its whistle and the whistle from the steam tractor reminded me of the same thing as it's going along watching a steam engine is quite an impression.
@@johncarl5505 thus removing the only person who could've stopped it. These old machines didn't have things like gas pedals. If you wanted it to change whatever it was doing or how it was doing it you had to turn the right valves and pull the right levers. Otherwise it was gonna keep on doing its thing until it either ran out of fuel or, God forbid, ran out of boiler water (ie big boom).
For those interested in knowing a little more about the science behind this, I'll explain a bit about the torque of a steam engine. Steam engines and a DC electric motor are the only two power sources that have 100% torque output at 0 RPM. For a steam engine, this is because the piston is pushed by steam, which is an expansive power source. When the engine is idling at about 250 RPM, the governor that controls the flow of steam to the engine is not very far open, and the steam in the cylinders are not using a lot of the expansive force of steam, as it is in and out of the cylinder so fast. As a load is aplied to the engine, the RPMs will fall off slightly and the governor will open up, supplying the cylinder with more steam. Eventually, the RPMs will fall enough to a point that the governor is just wide open, allowing 100% flow to the engine. This point would be the maximum horsepower point of the engine. This engine was rated from the factory as 110 HP at around 250 RPM. At that RPM range, it can put out around 3,000 lb/ft of torque. From that point on, as the load is increased, the engine RPMs will start to drop off, using the longer time in the cylinder to get more expansive force out of the steam. This leads to the horsepower dropping off, but the torque continuing to increase. The engine will continue to make less horsepower and more torque until it gets down to 0 RPM. At that point, the steam in the cylinder is applying maximum expansive force on the face of the piston. In other words words, 100% potential torque, but no horsepower, as horsepower is dependent upon a motion variable. I hope that makes sense. I tried to keep it all as simple as I could.
Basically a steam engine is 100% efficient, unlike every other internal combustion engine that came after it. They were called road locomotives for a reason, they were phased out because 1 they were too powerful to be off of rails, as described by an engineer in the 1870’s, and 2 they were so efficient that hardly any cost would run them. and 3 they were so cumbersome, and required so much maintenance to keep them operating. Then you always have the risk of boiler explosions, and it’s not an easy thing to operate. Using these to farm with was hard to do, not just anyone could run them, and you had to have two people at all times to run it one running the engine and one to keep the fire in the burn box going. They ran on either coal or wood. They ran the best on coal cause it burns the hottest but in a pinch it’ll run on wood at a reduced power level. Nowadays coal is so expensive and harder to come by they run them on wood. Nowadays you also have to have a boiler license, and they have to be inspected annually.
@@peted3637 super-heated unsaturated steam at the boiler rated pressure and temperature, thermodynamic steam tables and piston cross sectional area should be considered in your calculations. the post said 3000 ftlbs at 250 rpm.Steam engines and a DC electric motor are the only two power sources that have 100% torque output at 0 RPM. I suspect the max torque could be much higher than 600,000 ftlbs just before the boiler explodes and the 250 rpm is top speed, lol.
As an Englishman there is a certain envy i have of America, its people take such pride in its history and technology. Hopefully when this lockdown is over i can come out and live some of that rich history, its a country built on the hopes and dreams of many that never lived to see it come true.
As a proud American, I am a tad jealous of your steam lorries. They never really caught on over here. I think both countries have a strong appreciation for the machinery that built them.
@@youtubecensors9453 I wonder what he meant by that. I can find where these Case tractors were made anywhere else except Wisconsin. Although unlikely, it might be possible this tractor was repatriated later from overseas.
Everytime I hear the whistle of a steam engine tears start coming out because is just so majestic, when you watch a steam engine you can compare it to when you sit down with your grandpa and start having a conversation about his lifetime, you feel that admiration and deep respect. Is amazing to see technology from 323 years ago still showing off and beating new technology in basic stuff. OUTSTANDING!
I can understand why you would cry when you hear the whistle on the steam engine and I also enjoy the sound of the steam engine on one those tractors. When you hear something like that and tears come to your eyes. It's like that for me but with other things though.
A little sled like that isn’t going to bother an engine like that. He had steam to spare, blowing the whistle and still venting extra steam near the front wheels. It wasn’t even trying.
@@albratgaming2348 I watched a video of a British Fowler B5 Road Locomotive tow ten trailers loaded on the flat. Traction engines can do just what tractors do and road locomotives an do just what truck can do, they just do it slower.
Legend has it, during this pull the tractor and sled never actually moved from their fixed point in space; rather, the tractor moved the earth beneath it, giving the illusion of motion!
@@settingshadow Yes. They have to watch the pressure. When it's getting to high they blow some off. If an engine blows it's a very bad day for anyone that's around it. Keep them in range, everything is safe. Turns out this engine has a pop valve set for 160 Lbs. You'd never want to get that high.
the stock spark arrestor has been removed. This would normally not emit this kind of visible burning ash. They provide a function but also reduce overall power as the airflow leaving the stack and the steam along with it provide an induced draft in the firebox which increases heat and thus generated steam. This is common practice when power and efficiency is prized over environmental concerns like setting the ditch on fire.
Thats what you get when you have 100% of torques from zero revs and a 1 stroke engine - power on the upstroke and power on the downstroke. So 2 cylinders provide the same number of power strokes as a V8, but with torque from zero revs and maximum chamber pressure for the full stroke. So a 2 cylinder steam engine is more like a V24 Deisel than anything else.
@@Ben31337l You have no idea what you're talking about lol. Its the surface area of the piston that matters - displacement it utterly irrelevant as there is no combustion occurring in the cylinder. I just LOVE the over confidant moron. Its called the Dunning Kruger Effect and fun fact - David Dunning is a friend of mine...
This right here! No screaming engine, no rapidly spinning wheels, no trying to go as fast down the track in hopes of maintaining momentum towards the end. Just pure, unadulterated, amazingly beautiful power!!! The sound! The raining embers! It's just so magnificent!
No getting the turbos up to boost or spinning the wheels to maintain momentum. Just pure unadulterated grunt, truly a tortoise and the hare moment. (And the hare is still going)
My uncle drove a traction engine in the late 1800's. When I was seven , he then eighty-five, described how he and 22 other drivers and engines each towed an eleven furrow plough side by side, day after day to create New Zealand's Canterbury plains. They had to arise at 4:00a.m. and stoke the boilers, then have breakfast while the engines built up enough steam to begin the day's work. After days and days of ploughing the crossed the plains and then turned around and ploughed side by side back again. Over and over until the job was done. His name was Fred Carter.
@@arsanzic2161 It is crazy - but in reality he was my great-uncle - my Grandmother's brother. He kind of took to my father when Dad was a kid and once Dad grew up was a frequent visitor to our farm and often stayed with us for several weeks at a time. He also took to me and his telling of New Zealand bush and bushmen, traction engines, horse useage before tractors etc were amazing and compelling . Now its me thats close to eighty and I tell my grandkids all uncle Fred's stories in turn.
@@osmanthewoodsman5040 The plains were ploughed because they were needed to grow rotating crops of Wheat, Barley and Oats. Today they are still New Zealand's largest producer of those same crops - but of course some traditional farming has also occurred there and there is now a big effort at also replanting some areas with the original native grasses, shrubs and trees that once grew there.
Modern guy 1: Mine runs on Nitro Methane with NOS direct port injection. Modern guy 2: We run deisel with turbos and propane injection. Old timer: I gost me sum wood!
@@majorphysics3669 And I would say you would be absolutely correct. We get the word from Latin ..trahere .. which means "to pull". Early steam engine pullers, so to speak, we're coined traction engines, which is in fact where we get the word tractor. But traditionally if it's powered by steam it's still called a traction engine.
My town hosts the county fair every year and still has two nights of tractor pulls. Many, many years ago, it had a lot more classes than it does now and the pulls might not end until 2 or 3 am the next morning! One of those years, the US Army had some equipment on display. One of those was a vehicle used to tow tanks and other heavy equipment. Ona Saturday night, when the heaviest class of farm tractor pulled, 15,000 lbs, the Army wanted to show off. With the sled still loaded and geared for those 15,000 lb tractors, the tow vehicle was hooked up to it. What could stop a seven and a half ton tractor short of 300 feet was nothing to a vehicle that weighed 40-50 tons and designed to tow that much again behind it.
I'd bet $50 it was an M88 Hercules armored recovery vehicle. Basically, a wrecker for tanks lol they should've chained up three tractors and let it pull them. 🙂
I watched one video that stated that a 150 hp steam engine running at 200 RPM produced 8000 ft lbs of torque. Im as equally impressed at the drive train that can harness that much power.
Actually they did make a new one, a 150 horsepower Case. Interesting to see, especially on a brake, over 6,000 ft lbs of torque and that's just where the brake maxed out at.
@@beardedgeek973 Yes, they don't have 4 strokes just to have one explosion, and that they are always trying to expand, not only when the explosion is ocurring, after that, its just the fluid from the exhaust.
My grandad with was born in 1901. Owned a farm in SE Kansas. When work needed to be done, he did it. I promise you he drove these beasts and thrashed wheat with one. Thinking about him standing tall and clear eyed in 1925 or so fills my heart with pride. Watching this again, I could almost hear and smell what he experienced in a time I'm only vaguely familiar with. Then much to my surprise I burst into tears. I had to get up and go for a walk.
Did I just see something from like the civil war era dunk on every other tractor pull at like 5 mph? The darn thing didn't run out of steam it ran out of track
Much smaller steam engines could run an entire factory on one large leather belt turning a long steel shaft that would power other belts for each machine. (Imagine the belts on your car engine that turn from the crankshaft pulley and turn the alternator, the water pump, the power steering pump etcetera! Now imagine a smaller steam engine than this mobile one running a shaft connected to 10 machines with hand activated levers (like a clutch in a manual car) to activate any machine you can imagine! If it is a metal machine shop then it would be drills and lathes and punches and brakes and on and on. Or it might be a clothing shop with looms and sewing machines and whatever you need.
@@kevintucker3354 That is bad ass. I wonder if they still can't be used for things that require extreme torque, like pulling heavy mining equipment up a mountain. They do that with 4 trucks at once now. You could do that with one steam engine.
@@theinvertedpineapple942 no, it was a not funny thing people say all the time which is totally incorrect and gives false insight into words which have actual meaning.
Irony is these large traction engines by CASE were used mostly to haul timber sleds or large heavy materials on stoneboats. In other words it was made exactly to pull a very heavy sled digging into the ground XD. Lombard tracked engine pulling a timber sled train encrypted-tbn0.gstatic.com/images?q=tbn%3AANd9GcQ_IKG142vlnKdL56fnkzxgDF3Dz8xzkGlYXQ&usqp=CAU
Every feeling has already been mentioned in the comments below, yet very excited to express my joy of being absolutely mesmerised by the sheer power of this 'Great Oldie'...In love with this tractor😍😍
Xx Elite113 xX You may not believe this but there is a house that has one of these sitting in the living room. It's got a big back door off the living room. I guess they have that in CASE they want to take her to a show every once in a while. 😳
For some reason those maschines stayed in use until mid 70ties. At least I know of one examle. Doesnt it come to the pressure that the Boiler can produce and maintain? I think in Europe where also 250 hp tractors around. F×l=m
This never gets old. The amazing power these steam engines produce is incredible. 110 hp and 3000 ft lbs of torque less than 300 rpms. Let’s see anything else come close to these 100+ year old monsters.
And also, how stupid we are for not still using them with modern steam generators that are half the size of that engine, but output twice the steam force.
@@aserta The cold reality is that a diesel engine can do 99% of the jobs that a steam engine can do, cheaper, more efficiently and with much simpler operation. Steam engines are cool, like a lot of other obsolete tech, but they're (mostly) obsolete for good reasons.
This is really the best way to explain 110 Power and 5000 pound feet of torque, it will only go about 7 miles an hour, but will drag 50 tons doing it 💪🏼🙋🏼♂️👌🏻
@@oxide9679 My guess there is simply a century of technological advancements. We got wings and then reached the moon in about half the timeframe compared to when that tractor was built vs to a semi today And getting into the technological side, that tractor model had 3k torque and weighed almost 45k pounds just as the tractor alone, no attachments, so a fair helping of her power is being used to just move herself. Not sure on her actual towing limit though, but I would imagine it is still pretty high
I got here from a video about the new-build Case 150, and now I am having way to much fun watching an old steam engine do it's best volcano impersonation.
Emil Muhrman nope, that’s electric motors. Steam engines produce the most torque once the drive gear is moving at roughly 10-15mph, otherwise they don’t have as much torque when they’re at a standstill compared to moving slowly.
@@thegeforce6625 Emil Muhrman is actually right, or close at least. Steam engines and a DC electric motor are the only two power sources that have 100% power at 0 RPM. For a steam engine, this is because the piston is pushed by steam, which is an expansive power source. When the engine is idling at about 250 RPM, the governor that controls the flow of steam to the engine is not very far open, and the steam in the cylinders are not using a lot of the expansive force of steam, as it is in and out of the cylinder so fast. As a load is aplied to the engine, the RPMs will fall off slightly and the governor will open up, supplying the cylinder with more steam. Eventually, the RPMs will gall enough to a point that the governor is just wide open, allowing 100% flow to the engine. This point would be the maximum horsepower point of the engine. This engine was rated from the factory as 110 HP at around 250 RPM. At that RPM range, it can put out around 3,000 lb/ft of torque. From that point on, as the load is increased, the engine RPMs will start to drop off, using the longer time in the cylinder to get more expansive force out of the steam. This leads to the horsepower dropping off, but the torque continuing to increase. The engine will continue to make less horsepower and more torque until it gets down to 0 RPM. At that point, the steam in the cylinder is applying maximum expansive force on the face of the piston. In other words words, 100% potential torque, but no horsepower, as horsepower is dependent upon a motion variable. I hope that makes sense. I tried to keep it all as simple as I could.
Naaaah, no turbo diesels or supercharged Chevs,, or even Merlins. Just a tank of water and some premium firewood. And it is sporty as well with wire wheels.
i was thinking...hmm...isn't this thing with the sliding weight supposed to grind any tractor to a halt ? then this thing kept going all the way until it runs out of track.
@@bananamontana3956 Grousers down, weights on and advanced, just like normal. This tractor weighs 21 TONS. It's 5 times the weight of the heaviest class and makes dozens of times the amount of torque. It will never pull QUICKLY, but it will ALWAYS pull. The entire damn sled isn't even double the weight of this thing if it was absolutely maxxed out with 65klbs on it.
The sled suppose to move forward as being pulled increasing the load and gets harder to pull. Clearly in the video the sled never moves once so no load or weight was being applied
Somebody wrote a book about steam engines. (Sorry, I don't remember his name.) A friend wrote an introduction to the book in which he said that when they were boys (late nineteenth century) it seemed to them that nothing could stop the steam-powered locomotives, steam-powered ships, steam-powered tractors, etc. Nothing but hell or high water. Then, he said, he realized that was what made them go---hell and high water.
It's a good thing they had to bring the grain to the machine back then if that bitch was strolling down the field it woulda set the whole damn thing on fire
I think the most legendary tug-of-war of all time would be one of these versus a 747. Those engines put out so much thrust yet the Case's steel spiked wheels are practically infinite grip with practically infinite torque.
@UChHCd6EKo6z_yQ0adUCuqkQ mhm, just geared for pure torque over speed. It was dyno'd at 3,000 lbf at the shaft at 240rpm, and from counting wheel rotations I calculated the gear down ratio, which means at the wheels it's got 72,000 pound feet of torque, compare that to a Boeing 747-100 engine, a Pratt and Whitney JT9D-3A, those put out 43,500 pound feet of thrust. The tractor is around 10K off from matching the power of two of those engines (And if curious, a brand new 747-8 uses GE GEnx-2B67 turbines that put out 66,500 pound feet of thrust)
WOW The power and the glory of steam for ever and ever amen....... love the sparks and giant whistle, that must have been heard in Canada ! greetings from UK
Thankfully modern steel is leaps and bounds better than the steel they were using back then. The pressure vessel is supposed to be designed to handle twice the amount of pressure that it should ever see running at full power.
@@jeffreyyeater1780 A trickle of brand-new steam locomotives are indeed still made, including everything from the frames to the boiler to the cylinder castings (which are the actual hard part). Sometimes an old engine needs a new boiler too, eg. Flying Scotsman recently got one (of the proper A3 type; it had been running with an A4 boiler for a while).
@@CalebDiTdiesel engines on paper ARE far more powerful, but in reality, with a diesel engine, that power only lasts so long before it tops out at a certain point, it has a limit. But with steam there is no limit, the torque is never ending AND diesel engines only last so long, steam engines are built to serve their purpose forever. Not to mention that a steam engine has less moving parts than a diesel or gas engine, for example unlike diesel engines or gas engines they do not require things like transmissions or gear ratios because there is no power issues with a steam engine, it just puts the power directly down unlike combustion engines that require gear ratios and transmissions to step their power.
my beard grew about half an inch after watching this...this is so amazing!!!! I hope events like this continue, I'd love to bring my son to stuff like this so he can see how incredible it is! great video!!!
Turbojet ? Our "sleddog tractor" (Slædehunden) in danish had an upgrade from last year, now it runs on 5 " 8 cylinder hemis on pure ethanol pushing close to 15000 horses ;) No need for that turbo jet plastic crap to own the sledpull. We just won the dm today, yet again :) its now called "Beautiful noise" cause we are getting ready for EM ;)
Oh how cute your tractor has a diesel engine.
Mine has a single cylinder volcano!
LMAO! 🤜
Low carbon footprint, sustainable design :DD
@@matt995amg Well burning wood is carbon neutral, you just have to replant them. But if they are burning coal it´s another story.
@@Di3Leberwurst especially if most of the coal burns in the exhaust gas in the air :D
@@matt995amg low carbon footprint? It looks like it's burning through a whole coal seam.....😂
How much horsepower?
"110"
How much torque?
"All of it"
How much torque?
“Yes.”
All of the torques!
3000ft/lb @ 240 rpm
enough to restart a dead planet
artardFTW Correction - solar system. Maybe even tearing a hole in existence and making an alternate universe
Speed is measured in "house fires per hour".
Nah, they just threw stuff up the chimney to make a show, they don't make that kind of stuff in normal operation, in fact, Case, around that time was one of the first to adopt a clean steam. Imagine if they lit up the fields like this, they'd burn the crops under them.
Those sparks were the result of throwing a shovel full of sawdust into the firebox during the pull it's all for show
@@aserta im pretty sure this kind of tractor would be only used for plowing and harrowing but wheat stubble could still catch fire
😂👍
I just laughed so hard🤣
I've seen this in the flesh, and that whistle is absolutely amazing. We need more of these old things restored.
Well, if we get into WWIII, we may well need them!
I rode RR steamers as a tyke in early 1950s and remember them coming into & leaving Chicago Union Station. Always thrilled to hear the steam whistles.
Must of been a site
@@jerroldkazynski5480 I could remember one time while driving through Wyoming watching a Union Pacific Big Boy running along at about 75 miles an hour for about a couple of minutes on a stretch of road right next to the railroad tracks as it's chugging along blowing its whistle and the whistle from the steam tractor reminded me of the same thing as it's going along watching a steam engine is quite an impression.
I genuinely wonder what it would cost to build one now. Probably less than one of those multiple-big-block race pullers.
THE 5 M.P.H. MONSTER...
You might outrun it, but you'll never stop it.
U can, it is so slow, u can hop on and kick out the driver.
john carl Stupid
@@johncarl5505 thus removing the only person who could've stopped it. These old machines didn't have things like gas pedals. If you wanted it to change whatever it was doing or how it was doing it you had to turn the right valves and pull the right levers. Otherwise it was gonna keep on doing its thing until it either ran out of fuel or, God forbid, ran out of boiler water (ie big boom).
@@johncarl5505 r/whoosh
@@maxk4324 u r wrong. Me know better.
This might look cool but he's cheating. That engine is not actually pulling the sled, it's just rotating the earth underneath it.
Thanks for pointing this out. I knew it! I just knew it.
Thanks for the great comment.
Keep up the good work.
בס״ד
@@KelikakuCoutin beseder, ken chafer.
@@KelikakuCoutin is that sarcastic? It sounds sarcastic, but it doesn't 🤔
Knurlgnar24 For The Win. Best comment ever.
lolol how to copy a comment xD
For those interested in knowing a little more about the science behind this, I'll explain a bit about the torque of a steam engine. Steam engines and a DC electric motor are the only two power sources that have 100% torque output at 0 RPM. For a steam engine, this is because the piston is pushed by steam, which is an expansive power source. When the engine is idling at about 250 RPM, the governor that controls the flow of steam to the engine is not very far open, and the steam in the cylinders are not using a lot of the expansive force of steam, as it is in and out of the cylinder so fast. As a load is aplied to the engine, the RPMs will fall off slightly and the governor will open up, supplying the cylinder with more steam. Eventually, the RPMs will fall enough to a point that the governor is just wide open, allowing 100% flow to the engine. This point would be the maximum horsepower point of the engine. This engine was rated from the factory as 110 HP at around 250 RPM. At that RPM range, it can put out around 3,000 lb/ft of torque. From that point on, as the load is increased, the engine RPMs will start to drop off, using the longer time in the cylinder to get more expansive force out of the steam. This leads to the horsepower dropping off, but the torque continuing to increase. The engine will continue to make less horsepower and more torque until it gets down to 0 RPM. At that point, the steam in the cylinder is applying maximum expansive force on the face of the piston. In other words words, 100% potential torque, but no horsepower, as horsepower is dependent upon a motion variable. I hope that makes sense. I tried to keep it all as simple as I could.
Torque= hp x 5252 ÷ rpm
So for zero rpm 577,720 foot pounds before the gearbox.
Chris-earl Dookie WHAT? Holy mother of god!
Basically a steam engine is 100% efficient, unlike every other internal combustion engine that came after it. They were called road locomotives for a reason, they were phased out because 1 they were too powerful to be off of rails, as described by an engineer in the 1870’s, and 2 they were so efficient that hardly any cost would run them. and 3 they were so cumbersome, and required so much maintenance to keep them operating. Then you always have the risk of boiler explosions, and it’s not an easy thing to operate. Using these to farm with was hard to do, not just anyone could run them, and you had to have two people at all times to run it one running the engine and one to keep the fire in the burn box going. They ran on either coal or wood. They ran the best on coal cause it burns the hottest but in a pinch it’ll run on wood at a reduced power level. Nowadays coal is so expensive and harder to come by they run them on wood. Nowadays you also have to have a boiler license, and they have to be inspected annually.
@@chris-earldookie5014
If it was rated at 110HP at 230RPM (some arbitrary rpm stated in the literature), at that RPM, it was making 2,511ft/lb
@@peted3637 super-heated unsaturated steam at the boiler rated pressure and temperature, thermodynamic steam tables and piston cross sectional area should be considered in your calculations. the post said 3000 ftlbs at 250 rpm.Steam engines and a DC electric motor are the only two power sources that have 100% torque output at 0 RPM. I suspect the max torque could be much higher than 600,000 ftlbs just before the boiler explodes and the 250 rpm is top speed, lol.
As an Englishman there is a certain envy i have of America, its people take such pride in its history and technology. Hopefully when this lockdown is over i can come out and live some of that rich history, its a country built on the hopes and dreams of many that never lived to see it come true.
Let us know when you make it to Texas. We'll buy you dinner and drinks.
As a proud American, I am a tad jealous of your steam lorries. They never really caught on over here. I think both countries have a strong appreciation for the machinery that built them.
He said it was brought over on the St. Lawrence. So it wasn't from the U.S
@@youtubecensors9453 I wonder what he meant by that. I can find where these Case tractors were made anywhere else except Wisconsin. Although unlikely, it might be possible this tractor was repatriated later from overseas.
@@youtubecensors9453 CASE is absolutely made in the United States. They're still in business though not the steam business
That thing could pull yesterday into tomorrow
It pulled 1890 into 2020
That's one of the funnier ones I've heard 😂😂
HAHAHAHA HOLY SHIT gosh, that made me laugh. That was a good one dude lol. Seriously, good job
@@redacted_redacted69 agreed, like foreal. Dudes clever
Well it was outclassed and replaced so it did a rather poor job at that
Everybody’s gangsta till Thomas comes off the tracks!
"I off the track motha fucka"
@@renz1013 Choo Choo Bitches!
#topcomment
I'm that's a type of tractor steam
@@rainygames1881 what?
So when Granddad says " the good old days" , we all kinda get it now.
Ffftg
Everytime I hear the whistle of a steam engine tears start coming out because is just so majestic, when you watch a steam engine you can compare it to when you sit down with your grandpa and start having a conversation about his lifetime, you feel that admiration and deep respect. Is amazing to see technology from 323 years ago still showing off and beating new technology in basic stuff. OUTSTANDING!
I can understand why you would cry when you hear the whistle on the steam engine and I also enjoy the sound of the steam engine on one those tractors. When you hear something like that and tears come to your eyes. It's like that for me but with other things though.
Cringe asf 💀
It only lists the horsepower on the side because if they listed the torque it wouldn't fit
Accurate
That's fordammmmmnsure!!! Hahahaha
4000 Nm is nothing.
14 cylinder RT-flex96C, which makes largest container ships on Earth move, produces 7,6 million Nm at 102 RPM.
It's around 5000ft-lbs for these steam tractors.
@@UltraCasualPenguin I didnt know container ships competed in tractor pulling events.
Horsepower: 110
Torque: THE EARTH MOVES IN THE OPPOSITE DIRECTION OF THE WHEELS.
Horsepower: 110
Torque: Able to pull the mental weight my bills have burdened me with
@@henrymerrilees9066 Then don't post in public for all to see...
me: Standing by for salty retort
@@GasketManzrevenge
**But nobody came.**
Horsepower: 110
Torque Googolplex
Wasn’t it 610 horse power
A little sled like that isn’t going to bother an engine like that. He had steam to spare, blowing the whistle and still venting extra steam near the front wheels. It wasn’t even trying.
With that kind of traction... He could have pulled 20 of those sleds and it still would not have slowed him down.
It’s supposedly able to tow 50 tons
@@swordscar6278 so you telling me that this thing can pull more than the grey hulk can lift. Damn
@@swordscar6278 50 tons on rotating axle is different than 50 tons flat on the floor.
@@albratgaming2348 I watched a video of a British Fowler B5 Road Locomotive tow ten trailers loaded on the flat. Traction engines can do just what tractors do and road locomotives an do just what truck can do, they just do it slower.
He doesnt even stop, he's just like, "mine now"
Probably still towing that sled across the usa after seven years.
I thought he was going to take it home with him
Going by the rule of "you keep what you kill", the sled is technically his now lol
Legend has it, during this pull the tractor and sled never actually moved from their fixed point in space; rather, the tractor moved the earth beneath it, giving the illusion of motion!
If you have ever wondered why some days seem longer than others, it's because this tractor was driving East, those days.
Man. You just blew my mind. Smoked some legal weed up here and just read this.... like wow.
That's how Chuck Norris "walks"
That's the funniest comment ever!
You got a point there
That was the most relaxed full pull ever. He even used some of the steam to blast the horn. Legend.
I've never seen a steam powered anything with a horn. Unnecessary complexity when you can just put on a whistle.
activating the horn will reduce the steam on the system right?
@@settingshadow Yes. They have to watch the pressure. When it's getting to high they blow some off. If an engine blows it's a very bad day for anyone that's around it. Keep them in range, everything is safe. Turns out this engine has a pop valve set for 160 Lbs. You'd never want to get that high.
That’s a whistle, not a horn!
@@settingshadow it's a whistle
This thing will burn the field down before it's harvested.
It'll give the crops an extra smokey flavor 😂
😂😂
Haha true, they harvest the burned
the stock spark arrestor has been removed. This would normally not emit this kind of visible burning ash. They provide a function but also reduce overall power as the airflow leaving the stack and the steam along with it provide an induced draft in the firebox which increases heat and thus generated steam. This is common practice when power and efficiency is prized over environmental concerns like setting the ditch on fire.
@@joshuamorehead6124 XD
We rebuilt and showed one of these. What a piece of art. I love the old iron.
“What can you pull with that thing?”
“Whatever I want”.
"What can you pull with that thing?"
"Yes"
"All of it"
something like this? ua-cam.com/video/NQj-d6KWSnU/v-deo.html
"I can pull your house."
It could pull a bend out of a river!
Legend has it a man was plowing his field with one of these and set it too deep. Now we have the Grand Canyon.
ba hahahahahahaha
alright, that's GOOD
that was after he reset the depth
the first go around gave the Marians trench
everybody gangsta till thomas comes off the tracks
Ive never cried so much 😂😂😂😂😂
Hahaha! Now that's funny and true!!
😂😂😅
I’m thomas
🤣🤣🤣
I love watching the wheels just TURNING: not spinning or slipping.
No panic; no urgency; just GO.
Designed to push the ground behind you.
Thats what you get when you have 100% of torques from zero revs and a 1 stroke engine - power on the upstroke and power on the downstroke. So 2 cylinders provide the same number of power strokes as a V8, but with torque from zero revs and maximum chamber pressure for the full stroke.
So a 2 cylinder steam engine is more like a V24 Deisel than anything else.
Nah, this thing moves the earth around the tractor. Not- the tractor around the earth
@@xtremeownagedotcom
They knew how to squeeze the good outta 110 horse power!
@@piccalillipit9211 You have no idea what you're talking about lol.
It's the displacement that matters.
@@Ben31337l You have no idea what you're talking about lol.
Its the surface area of the piston that matters - displacement it utterly irrelevant as there is no combustion occurring in the cylinder. I just LOVE the over confidant moron.
Its called the Dunning Kruger Effect and fun fact - David Dunning is a friend of mine...
This right here! No screaming engine, no rapidly spinning wheels, no trying to go as fast down the track in hopes of maintaining momentum towards the end. Just pure, unadulterated, amazingly beautiful power!!!
The sound! The raining embers! It's just so magnificent!
I couldn’t agree with you more. Great comment. 👍
No getting the turbos up to boost or spinning the wheels to maintain momentum. Just pure unadulterated grunt, truly a tortoise and the hare moment. (And the hare is still going)
It probably outweighs the sled though and the hitch point might be really high. It's still awesome.
its called slowly but surely hehe
No it just needs a bigger, heavier sled 😁
I used to wonder why they make the roof out of tin. Now I know: Sometimes it's raining fire...
Not normally the description said they put saw dust in the boiler
Romar Miller this is how forest fires started...terrible.
@@ZoeyTheGSP no forest fires start with gender reveals
DemolitionBlueCheese terrible? Forrest fires occur naturally from lightning too. Are you anti lightning or just anti steam?
@@ZoeyTheGSP i dont think those ember would be enough to cause a fire and plus, who would run one of these in a dense forest
110 HP and enough torque to pull rosie o'donald away from a buffet.
If it can pull Michael Moore away from a box of donuts, then I'll REALLY be impressed!.
🤦♂️🤣🤣🤣
@Frosty One Either that or she'd just take it with her.
Bradley, I'm not sure anything has that much torque but if anything does it would be this tractor...
Oh man did you make me laugh...oh buddy. Now that was funny!
My uncle drove a traction engine in the late 1800's. When I was seven , he then eighty-five, described how he and 22 other drivers and engines each towed an eleven furrow plough side by side, day after day to create New Zealand's Canterbury plains. They had to arise at 4:00a.m. and stoke the boilers, then have breakfast while the engines built up enough steam to begin the day's work. After days and days of ploughing the crossed the plains and then turned around and ploughed side by side back again. Over and over until the job was done. His name was Fred Carter.
You had an uncle that was 85 when you were 7? That's pretty crazy in and of itself.
@@arsanzic2161 It is crazy - but in reality he was my great-uncle - my Grandmother's brother. He kind of took to my father when Dad was a kid and once Dad grew up was a frequent visitor to our farm and often stayed with us for several weeks at a time. He also took to me and his telling of New Zealand bush and bushmen, traction engines, horse useage before tractors etc were amazing and compelling . Now its me thats close to eighty and I tell my grandkids all uncle Fred's stories in turn.
9
Why were they had to plow the plains? Aren't plains already natural grass sources for grazing animals?
@@osmanthewoodsman5040 The plains were ploughed because they were needed to grow rotating crops of Wheat, Barley and Oats. Today they are still New Zealand's largest producer of those same crops - but of course some traditional farming has also occurred there and there is now a big effort at also replanting some areas with the original native grasses, shrubs and trees that once grew there.
What were they feeding that thing? The souls of the damned?
lol!
+fnorgen good one haha
They were feeding it dead bodies of course!
+fnorgen The firebox is filled with the souls of the damned, the boiler topped off with the tears of children.
+fnorgen They used Dr. Emmet L. Brown’s presto logs.
Modern guy 1: Mine runs on Nitro Methane with NOS direct port injection.
Modern guy 2: We run deisel with turbos and propane injection.
Old timer: I gost me sum wood!
...n water, musnt fergit the water.
Lmao (best comment bud).
Coal.
Yeah, it's basically a locomotive that goes off rails. It'll pull what you got.
That's why they were not called tractors they were called traction engines.
@@davidcantwell2489 Well, I'd say that the word tractor comes from the words traction engine...
@@majorphysics3669
And I would say you would be absolutely correct. We get the word from Latin ..trahere .. which means "to pull". Early steam engine pullers, so to speak, we're coined traction engines, which is in fact where we get the word tractor.
But traditionally if it's powered by steam it's still called a traction engine.
@@davidcantwell2489 shoulda called them traction LOCOmotive
@@noidontthinksolol check out the conversion rate for boiler horsepower
My town hosts the county fair every year and still has two nights of tractor pulls. Many, many years ago, it had a lot more classes than it does now and the pulls might not end until 2 or 3 am the next morning! One of those years, the US Army had some equipment on display. One of those was a vehicle used to tow tanks and other heavy equipment. Ona Saturday night, when the heaviest class of farm tractor pulled, 15,000 lbs, the Army wanted to show off. With the sled still loaded and geared for those 15,000 lb tractors, the tow vehicle was hooked up to it. What could stop a seven and a half ton tractor short of 300 feet was nothing to a vehicle that weighed 40-50 tons and designed to tow that much again behind it.
Nc?
I'd bet $50 it was an M88 Hercules armored recovery vehicle. Basically, a wrecker for tanks lol they should've chained up three tractors and let it pull them. 🙂
M-88 Hercules, if memory serves
That was awesome, He put on quite a show!!
Look who we got here haha. How did you end up here? lol
***** Never woulda thought id see you here.
+TAOFLEDERMAUS First i find creepy cooter from demo ranch here . then you. lol
+TAOFLEDERMAUS ya i liked the horn and love your channel
+WinterHillBattalion lol i found him to on demos chanel and this one
"So there are those 5 16 cilinder turbo engines with NOS 11000 HP, gotta win"
this guy: "got 1 piston and steam, gl"
One? Sure?
@@phorzer32 One 12" bore by 12" stroke by the spec sheet listed in the video description.
@@Ghauster I would of thought it needed 2 to keep "momentum" and not stall out.
@@Ryan-re1rs steam pistons are powered in both "directions"... steam is directed by valves to the side that needs the pressure etc.
@Gus Goose...until you see the startup procedure and warmup time.
See kids, this is how you roll coal.
Not even balls out
Rolling spark
Literally haha 🤣
Hell ya
Steam engines have so much torque, it's amazing.
I watched one video that stated that a 150 hp steam engine running at 200 RPM produced 8000 ft lbs of torque. Im as equally impressed at the drive train that can harness that much power.
When folks say, "They don't make 'em like they used too.."
Ya no kidding...its like everything back then was over engineered to never stop
Actually they did make a new one, a 150 horsepower Case. Interesting to see, especially on a brake, over 6,000 ft lbs of torque and that's just where the brake maxed out at.
mmm
This thing would not pass my regulations at my shop
Gabe-fartpoop Peepants what’re the emission regulations for non road, steam powered vehicles? It’d be interesting and somewhat depressing to read.
Competing for torque against this thing is like arm wrestling a tectonic plate - you’re going to lose.
Yeah... Steam engines don't work like combustion ones. They don't choke and stop. That's why you need a safety release valve.
@@beardedgeek973 Yes, they don't have 4 strokes just to have one explosion, and that they are always trying to expand, not only when the explosion is ocurring, after that, its just the fluid from the exhaust.
My grandad with was born in 1901. Owned a farm in SE Kansas. When work needed to be done, he did it. I promise you he drove these beasts and thrashed wheat with one. Thinking about him standing tall and clear eyed in 1925 or so fills my heart with pride. Watching this again, I could almost hear and smell what he experienced in a time I'm only vaguely familiar with. Then much to my surprise I burst into tears. I had to get up and go for a walk.
@Hello there, how are you doing this blessed day?
That’s something truly heartwarming buddy. I’d have loved to of experienced this!
All the other guys: dont take the sled home we need that!
Steam guy: oh sorry I forgot it was back there.
I'm pretty sure they stopped because they ran out of track, not power. Could have dragged that sled all the way home.
The sled didn't lower it's anchor like it's meant to, tractor would of probably stopped dead I it's tracks
@@LocoMe4u yea. No. The torque is monsterous
@@timothywhite8130 you're an idiot for thinking this
@@LocoMe4u how so. Do the math. This tractor torque is monsterous. It could pull the sled to tenbucktu and back with Enough fuel and water
@@LocoMe4u steam engines produce absolutely ludicrous amounts of torque. An amount that would sound alien in the context of a combustion engine.
"I built a nation before your parents were born. Think that sled's gonna even slow me down?"
Outstanding comment! Those monsters did indeed build nations and transform the world. Amazing to think about.
Although the sled box is disengaged, not topped out, and the push down isn't on.
Did I just see something from like the civil war era dunk on every other tractor pull at like 5 mph? The darn thing didn't run out of steam it ran out of track
Steam engines beat anything and everything on torque.
Its about 30-40 years newer then the civil war but yea these old giants could out pull anything well not in speed but at least its always a full pull
Much smaller steam engines could run an entire factory on one large leather belt turning a long steel shaft that would power other belts for each machine. (Imagine the belts on your car engine that turn from the crankshaft pulley and turn the alternator, the water pump, the power steering pump etcetera! Now imagine a smaller steam engine than this mobile one running a shaft connected to 10 machines with hand activated levers (like a clutch in a manual car) to activate any machine you can imagine! If it is a metal machine shop then it would be drills and lathes and punches and brakes and on and on. Or it might be a clothing shop with looms and sewing machines and whatever you need.
@@kevintucker3354 That is bad ass. I wonder if they still can't be used for things that require extreme torque, like pulling heavy mining equipment up a mountain. They do that with 4 trucks at once now. You could do that with one steam engine.
@@Extort713 and/or a bicycle.
Sled man: 'How many torques does it have?'
Driver: 'All of them'
Remember kids, horsepower is how fast you hit the wall but torque is how far you take the wall with you 👌😎
That tractor takes 2 walls with it everywhere it goes.
No, that would be "speed" and "inertia".
@@pstrap1311 and that was also a “joke” that “you” didn’t get
@@theinvertedpineapple942 no, it was a not funny thing people say all the time which is totally incorrect and gives false insight into words which have actual meaning.
@@pstrap1311 you take things too literally. Ease off lmao its youtube.
It's 2017, 3 years later, and legend has it that the sled is still being dragged along.....somewhere in Pennsylvania right now.
Brian Giller The sled disappeared in a rut in the ground but the tractor is still pulling it.
It's probably only gone a mile in 3 years though😂
Legend has it , it crossed the Ben Franklin bridge, then the Jersey shore, did a "K" turn and now is headed back.
it just passed me!!
Is he just going to take the sled home with him?
Irony is these large traction engines by CASE were used mostly to haul timber sleds or large heavy materials on stoneboats. In other words it was made exactly to pull a very heavy sled digging into the ground XD. Lombard tracked engine pulling a timber sled train encrypted-tbn0.gstatic.com/images?q=tbn%3AANd9GcQ_IKG142vlnKdL56fnkzxgDF3Dz8xzkGlYXQ&usqp=CAU
@@Cragified amazing torque
Tht is really too much for a today's standard truck
He forgot the sled was still hooked up .he was just going to drive it home !
Are you gonna tell him he can't? I sure wouldn't.
Yes
Every feeling has already been mentioned in the comments below, yet very excited to express my joy of being absolutely mesmerised by the sheer power of this 'Great Oldie'...In love with this tractor😍😍
I am glad you enjoyed the video. Thanks for watching and commenting.
“not recommended for use in wooded areas”
Somewhere in the user manual, I’m sure.
What manual? I don’t see no manual. Lol
@hardly livin read the description dumbass
@@huh8896 Woooosh.... it was a joke dumbass.
@@Omegadoomship Yeah that probably got lit on fire too.
The manual was burnt when they pulled it out of the factory.
if you tow the sled to your house you get to keep it as a trophy
Rofl
+Stacy Rogers But how are you going to put it on the mantel over the fireplace?
Xx Elite113 xX
You may not believe this but there is a house that has one of these sitting in the living room. It's got a big back door off the living room. I guess they have that in CASE they want to take her to a show every once in a while. 😳
Rob Gill 😂😂😂😂😂 you fucking got me
do t dare him it could drag dat sled to HELL and back
Now you youngsters, let grandpa show you what torque is
O fook ya. XD
Hahahahaha
It's actually HP. The slower it moves, the higher force needed to make 110hp. Torque can be a static force, until an object moves.
More like great-grandpa.
For some reason those maschines stayed in use until mid 70ties. At least I know of one examle. Doesnt it come to the pressure that the Boiler can produce and maintain? I think in Europe where also 250 hp tractors around. F×l=m
Therapist: Steam engines ride on rails they can't get you.
Case Steam Tractor: *TOOT* *TOOT*
"Grandpa, the tractor pull just called.
Can they have their sled back?"
steve
Fuck sorry, almost forgot it was back there...
Grandpa still ain't done pulling it
Not till I finish getting this hill cleared smooth for planting - or as those candy-assed lib-ruls call it, Mount Everest...
jalapenochomper 🤣
That thing gave precisely zero fucks.
Gotta take it to an environmentalists meeting, and then just hook it up to the building, they'll be forced to look when the building comes down
Take it to a VeeDub meet . . . you'd never notice the emissions.
It was meant to pull far more.
TestECull wut does that mean
TestECull I
That thing still couldn't pull my wife's credit card from her hand.
It wouldn't pull the card from her hand. It would pull the card and her with it
My question is what's security at the mall gonna say when you pull that thing into jc pennys to try it?
Ok Boomer
@@random_bs_goo9154 ah the classic zoomer comment.
@@random_bs_goo9154 you fuckin losers are still calling people boomer? Wow
How can you not smile when looking at this time machine?❤😁
Amazing 100 years ago as it is today and 100 years from now. Timeless.
It’s truly incredible
This never gets old. The amazing power these steam engines produce is incredible. 110 hp and 3000 ft lbs of torque less than 300 rpms. Let’s see anything else come close to these 100+ year old monsters.
The Union Pacific Big Boy 4-8-8-4 wheel arrangement was- is unstoppable
This makes me smile for reasons I cannot explain.
110 hp.. Torque? Yes.
They told that Train it could be whatever it wants to be... and it became a tractor.
Underrated comment
@@Daytonaman675 hlkj ll, mjjjjjjjjj
Look at the embers falling all around from the smoke. That beautiful machine has the soul of a primordial god.
NASA called,
They want their Planetary spinning engine back.
😂
This proves how strong steam engines really were
And also, how stupid we are for not still using them with modern steam generators that are half the size of that engine, but output twice the steam force.
You would be very surprised how much a modern day tractor can pull hint hint its fucking terrifying
Most of the steam engines were underrated in the hp class just because of the massive amount of torque they had
@@aserta The cold reality is that a diesel engine can do 99% of the jobs that a steam engine can do, cheaper, more efficiently and with much simpler operation.
Steam engines are cool, like a lot of other obsolete tech, but they're (mostly) obsolete for good reasons.
@@TonboIV shut up I love steam
This is really the best way to explain 110 Power and 5000 pound feet of torque, it will only go about 7 miles an hour, but will drag 50 tons doing it 💪🏼🙋🏼♂️👌🏻
Only 50 tons? A big rig maxes at 40 tons and only has about 1100 ft/lbs of torque.
@@oxide9679 My guess there is simply a century of technological advancements. We got wings and then reached the moon in about half the timeframe compared to when that tractor was built vs to a semi today
And getting into the technological side, that tractor model had 3k torque and weighed almost 45k pounds just as the tractor alone, no attachments, so a fair helping of her power is being used to just move herself.
Not sure on her actual towing limit though, but I would imagine it is still pretty high
As a Steampunk lover, im amazed by that Tractor
Amazing how much power can be acheived by heating up some water
Well, you don't need the pistons to turn at all to get power. However, too much steam, and kabloowie.
literally rolling coal.
Literally indeed, cool how it started blowing hot embers straight up.
Mr. Sullivan they did that for entertainment by putting sawdust into the firebox
It is not rolling coal it is rolling FREAKING VOLCANOS
Hm. It's not very fast.
That was not coal. It was wood coal didn’t spark like that
"Those are still hot when they come out" yeah.... I couldnt tell by the glowing red color. Thanks announcer guy.
Read the video description please
"Those are still hot when they come down"
One of the most thrilling videos on all of UA-cam! Thanks for the wonderful machine and displaying it in exciting action like this!
Thanks for watching!
Thanks for watching and commenting
" what do you drive?
"a case"
"shiiiit how much hp tho?"
" 110 or so"
"lol, thats it... ok ok how much torque tho?"
"....yes"
Hahahhaa unlimited lol
"...all of it...."
people don't realize that it's 110 BOILER horsepower. Google the conversion rate for that and gasp
110 boiler hp is 1447 hp! JESUS CHRIST!
When it come to measuring that would be mine blowing . We talking about steam.
Wonder what they used to pull around with that? The farm?
there's videos on youtube of Steam Tractors doing actual work. they were used to pull a world record plow once
they also have a big flywheel on the side and use it as a power source with big leather belts to run sawmills , etc.
Mother in law!
Plowing the land.. Its good to own land
Exactly right! You secure the plow and pull the feild under it😂
Nothing anybody builds will be as badass as this tractor.
Hm maybe the Big Boy train engine then...
Unless it's another Case 110HP!
Vincent Jones it a normel old tractor a big bud wude pull that to anoter year
i don't know, prr 5550 will be quite the contender....
@@adoorfilms5293 "train engine"
No... there is no such thing as a "train engine"
I got here from a video about the new-build Case 150, and now I am having way to much fun watching an old steam engine do it's best volcano impersonation.
Who else randomly gets this recommended to them every now and again
KINGWARKING 12 Me
Me, and I couldn't be happier about it
Yep me too, this is like my 4th time in last 2 years, i love this vid👍🏼
Prolly the 4-5th time I’ve watched this now
Me, but I love steam engines, so I don't mind.
Dyno sheet:
110 hp
13000 tq
@450 rpm
A slight tweak to the gear ratio and it will pull moon across the night sky
It's not producing 13000 at 450 rpm . But peak torque is close to stall on Steam engines right?
Emil Muhrman nope, that’s electric motors. Steam engines produce the most torque once the drive gear is moving at roughly 10-15mph, otherwise they don’t have as much torque when they’re at a standstill compared to moving slowly.
@@thegeforce6625 Emil Muhrman is actually right, or close at least. Steam engines and a DC electric motor are the only two power sources that have 100% power at 0 RPM. For a steam engine, this is because the piston is pushed by steam, which is an expansive power source. When the engine is idling at about 250 RPM, the governor that controls the flow of steam to the engine is not very far open, and the steam in the cylinders are not using a lot of the expansive force of steam, as it is in and out of the cylinder so fast. As a load is aplied to the engine, the RPMs will fall off slightly and the governor will open up, supplying the cylinder with more steam. Eventually, the RPMs will gall enough to a point that the governor is just wide open, allowing 100% flow to the engine. This point would be the maximum horsepower point of the engine. This engine was rated from the factory as 110 HP at around 250 RPM. At that RPM range, it can put out around 3,000 lb/ft of torque. From that point on, as the load is increased, the engine RPMs will start to drop off, using the longer time in the cylinder to get more expansive force out of the steam. This leads to the horsepower dropping off, but the torque continuing to increase. The engine will continue to make less horsepower and more torque until it gets down to 0 RPM. At that point, the steam in the cylinder is applying maximum expansive force on the face of the piston. In other words words, 100% potential torque, but no horsepower, as horsepower is dependent upon a motion variable. I hope that makes sense. I tried to keep it all as simple as I could.
@@nathanielspoelman9881 yes it does thx for the info
Pulls up with 4 blown alcohol engines and 140mph wheelspin. Gets beat by a 110hp steam tractor at .5 mph 😂
Pretty fuckin much That's just how it goes
Yup, you should see the tug of war video where one of these drags a john deere tractor as if it werent even trying.
Yea I saw that when I was watching tug of war videos yesterday
It basically used the diesel tractor as a plow
The Hair and the Tortoise 👍🏻
Imagine the work that thing has done!!
That's History right there!!
Naaaah, no turbo diesels or supercharged Chevs,, or even Merlins. Just a tank of water and some premium firewood. And it is sporty as well with wire wheels.
Bet that thing would *really* scoot with an LS swap! ;-)
Hillary Clinton I'm fairly sure he was joking .......
bootsyfeathers no he wasn't joking. Here the only thing that matters is TORQUE, not speed.
LDN Wholesale
You betcha
Thedeoradude
Hmmmmm?
Real tractor pulling. Not the 27 engine bullshit we see now. This is just pure torque with a stack show and some horns. Lovin it.
i was thinking...hmm...isn't this thing with the sliding weight supposed to grind any tractor to a halt ? then this thing kept going all the way until it runs out of track.
@@Choice777 it's the weight that boiler means it weighs far more than any modern pulling tractor
@M Via the trailer isn't lowering it's anchor
@@bananamontana3956 Grousers down, weights on and advanced, just like normal.
This tractor weighs 21 TONS. It's 5 times the weight of the heaviest class and makes dozens of times the amount of torque. It will never pull QUICKLY, but it will ALWAYS pull.
The entire damn sled isn't even double the weight of this thing if it was absolutely maxxed out with 65klbs on it.
sevenhornets, they don’t make tractors with the same torque that bused to. This extreme low end torque. 5,000ft lbs of torque at .5 MPH.
CASE : setting your neighborhood on fire since 1904 :-D
1842*
Hahahahahahahahaha
Absolutely the coolest tractor pull to see in person..
Just keeps going, "Ok you can stop now, you're embarrassing the regulars"
The sled isn't lowered
PHDarren, 100+ yr old 110HP steam tractor beats the 600+HP Super Diesel truck.
Sled clearly wasn't pulling any true weight. It would be embarrassed by the other trucks with over 1,000lbs of torque
The sled suppose to move forward as being pulled increasing the load and gets harder to pull. Clearly in the video the sled never moves once so no load or weight was being applied
@@danfuller06 So you're blind? YOU SEE THE WEIGHT MOVING FORWARD IN THE VIDEO.
Legend has it he's still pulling the sled to this day
Somebody wrote a book about steam engines. (Sorry, I don't remember his name.) A friend wrote an introduction to the book in which he said that when they were boys (late nineteenth century) it seemed to them that nothing could stop the steam-powered locomotives, steam-powered ships, steam-powered tractors, etc. Nothing but hell or high water. Then, he said, he realized that was what made them go---hell and high water.
I wish I could remember the source - and the exact quote - of the declaration, "Steam engines are the most human of all machines."
@@bwilliams463 yes they truly do have a soul...
Until they blew up...
I know several people who blows up.
Repeatly...
It's a good thing they had to bring the grain to the machine back then if that bitch was strolling down the field it woulda set the whole damn thing on fire
Marvelous machines made by our ancestors, such craftsmanship, such artistically made machine...This video made my day!! Thank you uploader ❤️❤️💎💎
110 horsepower except every horse has legs the size of giant sequoias and they're on PCP
"I drive an imported Nissan GTR"..... "I drive Hell itself"....
So you're pretty gay then 😁
Smh...
@@dieselpower5303 ...what?
diesel power that doesn’t change the fact he imported a Nissan GT-R
Whippersnapper: "Hey grandpa!! That one has a jet engine!!!"
Old Man Case: "Son.... hold my Whiskey..."
I think the most legendary tug-of-war of all time would be one of these versus a 747. Those engines put out so much thrust yet the Case's steel spiked wheels are practically infinite grip with practically infinite torque.
@UChHCd6EKo6z_yQ0adUCuqkQ mhm, just geared for pure torque over speed. It was dyno'd at 3,000 lbf at the shaft at 240rpm, and from counting wheel rotations I calculated the gear down ratio, which means at the wheels it's got 72,000 pound feet of torque, compare that to a Boeing 747-100 engine, a Pratt and Whitney JT9D-3A, those put out 43,500 pound feet of thrust. The tractor is around 10K off from matching the power of two of those engines
(And if curious, a brand new 747-8 uses GE GEnx-2B67 turbines that put out 66,500 pound feet of thrust)
@@cpufreak101 No, jet engines put out pounds of thrust, not torque.
@@david-ut1zq ah sorry, I must've been high
@@cpufreak101 Is that per engine or per plane?
WOW The power and the glory of steam for ever and ever amen....... love the sparks and giant whistle, that must have been heard in Canada ! greetings from UK
This popped up in my recommendations again. It never gets old. 👍
0:40 the sound that makes V8 scared
now THAT is how you roll coal
yeah
Thomas Blithe Coal fuel, the original. I dig the horn, that's so cool!
Thomas Blithe yes it is
Thomas Blithe lmao
Thomas Blithe fuck yea you said it buddy Murcia by god
This is Still, The Best Video on 'UA-cam' Of This Tractor. It's all about the Video Quality, Positioning of the Recorder. THUMBS UP!
Wow thanks for the compliment.
@@Robgill2008 Watch "I Hear An Echo" on UA-cam
ua-cam.com/video/c0e752xVtQI/v-deo.html
This is my wife's channel, she made the video for the kids.
Steam tractor builder: “how much torque ya want?”
Customer: “all of the torques”
Tractor builder: “alrighty!”
Steam tractor builder: “how much torque ya want?”
Customer: “yes”
@@vampy625, Absolutely!
mmm
normal truck pull: man that engine explosion was cool
steam truck pull: *everyone in a 3 block radius is dead*
Thanks for watching
Yup, a bomb on wheels. I watched videos on domestic hot water heaters exploding, catastrophic damage to the houses that they were in.
Thankfully modern steel is leaps and bounds better than the steel they were using back then. The pressure vessel is supposed to be designed to handle twice the amount of pressure that it should ever see running at full power.
Does someone build new tanks for those. Just curious .
@@jeffreyyeater1780 A trickle of brand-new steam locomotives are indeed still made, including everything from the frames to the boiler to the cylinder castings (which are the actual hard part). Sometimes an old engine needs a new boiler too, eg. Flying Scotsman recently got one (of the proper A3 type; it had been running with an A4 boiler for a while).
HP:110
Torque: Only God knows
3000 ft-lbs
and with a single piston
Power output: 110 HP.
Torque: Yes...
Imagine 4 pistons
@@giovannicesaramorim9adigan961 That's at the crank shaft at high rpm. At the wheels, geared down, at low rpm it would be tens of thousands.
No matter how much technology advances nothing will ever rival the shear power of steam
??? Diesel engines are far more powerful. The green tractor would have won the competition if the steam-powered tractor was of equal weight.
@@CalebDiTdiesel engines on paper ARE far more powerful, but in reality, with a diesel engine, that power only lasts so long before it tops out at a certain point, it has a limit. But with steam there is no limit, the torque is never ending AND diesel engines only last so long, steam engines are built to serve their purpose forever. Not to mention that a steam engine has less moving parts than a diesel or gas engine, for example unlike diesel engines or gas engines they do not require things like transmissions or gear ratios because there is no power issues with a steam engine, it just puts the power directly down unlike combustion engines that require gear ratios and transmissions to step their power.
my beard grew about half an inch after watching this...this is so amazing!!!! I hope events like this continue, I'd love to bring my son to stuff like this so he can see how incredible it is! great video!!!
+Rahmel Freeman thank you
Case laughs at your 5000 horsepower turbojet tractors.
MrLehi99
Turbojet ? Our "sleddog tractor" (Slædehunden) in danish had an upgrade from last year, now it runs on 5 " 8 cylinder hemis on pure ethanol pushing close to 15000 horses ;) No need for that turbo jet plastic crap to own the sledpull. We just won the dm today, yet again :) its now called "Beautiful noise" cause we are getting ready for EM ;)
thomas rexen that case would drag your tractor
gregistopal. it'd climb up on the back of it and root it to death.
That tractor has enough torque to peel a priest off a choir boy!
Kirk Hermary Savage
Enough torque to pull a damn church full of priests.
Bahahahaha
Enough torque to pull down the whole Vatican
I don't know, that would take a lot of torque. 😀😳😇
I've watched this video a 100 times and I still love it