Stephen Hawking view on God | Science vs God
Вставка
- Опубліковано 22 січ 2023
- Around 13.8 billion years ago our universe born from the big bang. If big bang was true, then who triggered that.
Many people perceive the struggle to understand our Universe as a battle between science and God. But this is a false dichotomy. Stephen hawing- one of the great scientist. In his final book “Brief Answers to Big questions” explains his view on God in the topic of “Is there a God?”.
And He said during an interview with El Mundo in 2014: “Before we understand science, it is natural to believe that God created the universe. But now science offers a more convincing explanation. What I meant by ‘we would know the mind of God’ is, we would know everything that God would know, if there were a God, which there isn’t. I’m an atheist.”
Even though he is a great scientist, can we accept that what he said is right?
@Klonusk
Mail : Klonusk@gmail.com
#god #stephenhawking #godexists - Наука та технологія
Bro I don't get it why this UA-camr does not get likes cause he makes such good content
With a lot of people logic and Common Sense aren't something they're used to hearing and so they don't get it. It's as if they're listening to a foreign language when you start "hitting them" with reason.
This video touches on complex topics that intersect science and philosophy, two different domains with divergent methods for approaching truth. I wanted to provide some perspectives on the issues raised:
- Stephen Hawking did not attempt to disprove God using scientific theories. As a scientist, he understood that God is by definition outside the scope of scientific inquiry. However, Hawking preferred empirical scientific explanations over metaphysical ideas.
- There is no scientific consensus that the universe was created from "nothing." Furthermore, the concept of creation lies more in the realm of religion rather than science. Scientifically, one assumes matter and energy exist in different forms rather than being created.
- No evidence in science points to the universe or its rules being consciously created. As mentioned prior, creation falls under a religious framework, not a scientific one. The prevailing scientific view is that the matter and energy preceding the Big Bang expanded to form the observable universe today.
Talking about god from a scientific point of view is a silly idea in general, because indeed there's no scientific methodology to apply to any kind of god. You can not use logic to predict what god will do, and you can not make an experiment to test it. An entity that is called god is fundamentally out of reach of any kind of science.
Show me a person who is able to investigate how logic started ruling the world! Or one who is able to examine the evolution of the laws of nature (the objective ones I mean, not how we formulated them). Beginning of the world is also a non-scientific concept, because we can only work with whatever already exists, and only extrapolate backwards based on that.
Now is that supposed to mean that whatever the science has not discovered doesn't exist? Obviously not. There are many things science can't discover on principle. For example answers to inherently humanitarian questions like "what makes us happy and what makes us miserable?" Sure, some things that make us happy or miserable are very well scientifically measurable. But how exactly are we even going to measure happiness itself objectively? All we have is a person telling us they're happy! Love is another such concept that is "irrelevant" for science. Does that mean it should be irrelevant to us?
And so on, there's a ton of other "abstract" things that add meaning, value, and purpose to our lives. Natural science can't work with them. And it's a profanation of both science AND religion to try to prove irrelevance of non-scientific concepts on a general, philosophical scale. Philosophy also doesn't obey to scientific method. But it's an extension of religion, if we define religion as "whatever handles moral questions as part of universal worldview questions".
The idea that god does not exist is also purely religious, not scientific. Because it answers a purely religious, non-scientific question. In religion, any scientifically observable phenomenon can be explained as an act of god. It's just a level of mental maturity that determines how stupid we want to imagine it. Is it about an old man on a cloud throwing lightnings at us, and then we go there and see nobody? Or is it about designing an entire universe in a way that doesn't enforce any specific worldview, neither theistic nor atheistic?
There's no limit on how far back we could go and say "now this scientifically verified phenomenon has been curated by god on a higher level". We just don't need to forcibly limit ourselves with any one worldview (scientific OR religious), because it damages our overall awareness... and ability to adapt our current worldview to new discoveries (something science claims to be able to do, but variety of factors make it harder, like bureaucracy in academics, or business model of scientific journals).
Hawkins was true about God not having enough time to create the universe, except for him thinking that God works inside time space. God created time. So he is beyond time. That also says that God doesn't need a past creator necessarily. Because there is no past for God. The whole timeline is present to him. He has created the past, the present and the future for his creations.
Than why doesnt he make the future good so people dont starve and have pointless wars, if he is the creater? Also why is the earth not in the center of everything since that is his most talked about creation?
@@denice.a3620He will. Read Revelation
@@denice.a3620Because people have free will they can do good or bad things. But there's a limit to what will by law and morality of human minds. Second to your question. Our world is not defined as the only being in this universe. We are just mirrors of different planes of existence.
@@youraveragejoe6470 people have free will to do bad and good? What is bad and what is good everyone has a different view on that so on what is that based. does it count for babies as well?? And for the mirrors of different places it is not explained that does exist in the book
@@youraveragejoe6470 plus that doesnt explain it still he could have made us so we would not do bad. We are "his" creations after all you guys say, so he created the bad in us he made a mistake in making us than.
Mankind will never stop asking questions. That’s how God created us
That's what made God God
That is as it should be. Science is constantly evolving as new discoveries are made. When anybody refuses to talk to anybody else about science when that person claims to be a "scientist" that is a person pretending to be a "scientist" and who is afraid of being exposed as a fraud.
No true scientist would be so arrogant as to publicly Proclaim that THEY- are the "science".
And yet those who question the existence of God are condemned for it
You're doing that awful, outdated routine of saying _"God created us"_ without attaching a shred of evidence to prove your claim is true. It's 2024, mohammmed, not 1724. In 2024, you have to prove your claims with evidence, not just claim such things.
Here's what truly perplexes and enrages religious people of all faiths: Even if there is a god, it's nothing remotely like what's in your particular superstitious texts. Even if a deist agrees that there might be a god, there's zero chance that it's like the monsters described in the bible, the quoran, the Torah or any other man-made book of nonsense. So, believers, I'll grant you that there's a god, but it's not the one you get to describe and create out of your fevered, terrified minds. Amen.
Read the book 📖 of genesis
Agreed. Although according to some religions the bibles are supposed to be god-made… (or god inspired) There is a little to no chance that any bible on earth is actually real. I am christian, but i still believe that my religion probably isn’t true (it is a 1 in almost a billion chance considering how many religions there are) It is simply the religion i have the *most* faith in, but this statement seems the most-likely. Well put. 👍
yeah that's what seems most reasonable for me. There's too many human made god(s) and goddesses etc and there's literally a 0% chance a real god is accurately described by any of them. But it doesn't mean there isn't some form of a god or gods.
I respectfully disagree. While I look at certain religions, such as Islam, I see an obvious pyramid scheme that got Mohammed quite rich. I don't see that with early Christianity, which implies there could be something to it.
People die for false beliefs because they genuinely believe in them, or at the very least had a very good material gain to get out of it.
The early Christians would've known if it was for real or not yet died for their faith and had no real hope of material gain to really justify it. They could've been crazy, but that wouldn't explain how admittedly well the New Testemant was put together, shared delusions or just weird factors like Saul of Taursus converting and the early Christians at the same time not immediately stoning him.
If there is a God, at least one that cared about humans, I would think he would've made an attempt to communicate with us, so, really, I think it's quite likely one of the major religions would have the moral answers to everything.
Proof that it is false? (I'm Muslim so don't say the bible is false because I already know that)
“Absence of Evidence does not mean Evidence of Absence”
Dr. Carl Segan
also, there isn't much absence of evidence, as Eucharists have turned into heart tissue and AB type blood quite a few times.
_"The Bible is primitive legend"_
*(Albert Einstein)*
Absence of evidence is not proof of non-existence but it's a pretty reliable indicator. Religious believers are not looking for the truth, they are looking for a fantasy they can live with. There is plenty of evidence that people make up gods, and will cling to even the slightest possibility that they are real..
imam Ali was asked how do you see God he replied :
Eyes can never see God, but hearts with proper belief can recognize God. God is close to everything, but not attached to things; is away from everything, but is no stranger to them; is a speaker, not through thinking or thought; is determined, not by desire or wish; is creator/maker, not by hands or legs; is kind and friendly, and that is not secret or hidden; is great not by oppression; can see but not with external senses; is kind, but not touchy; the heads and faces fall down (prostrate) due to God’s greatness; and the hearts are restless due to fearing God
Zero is the sum of positive and negative. Wow! That's an inspiration! ❤🥰
Nothing created God, and even if something created God then that God can’t be the all powerful God We’re worshipping!
Science proves the how and what of the universe, while god proves the why and who of everything
Hawkings concept of god is the multiverse, totally un-provable...I kinda find this amusing , the two sides are not so different these days.
Before I was baptized in California, I met a false god who called himself as crazy monk in Taiwan university's second graduate
student's dormitory when I was watching TV. After that I realized that spiritual persons' existence. So I believed God finally.
What is the sense brother...here there is not such a thing for believing in god by these occurred event😂😂you have gone through a spiritual person so what happened??you will start to believe in the existence of god😂😂......DAMN BROTHER 🙏
Brain is the creator of both positive and negative thoughts. We need to arrange and adjust it according to our life style.
Yes.... Who created God? This my all time question from childhood when my mother told me about god.... I thought I would find the answer in future with the help of highly qualified peoples....
But now I understand that our brain doesn't support that "answer" ... because of our limitations in this reality of life.......
Well I'm happy that I know many things better than average people who believe in "faith"
It's very simple
God by definition is uncreated, anything that is created is not God
God is beyond time and space
If God was created that'd suggest that something existed before God
But since there's no "before" and "after" for God, it doesn't make sense to say someone created Him
Thats very intellectually appealing and balanced conclusion for looking at the universe in all modesty. Though I hope you could touch over the point of human consciousness as well. We all believe as if we or other living creatures have 'will' to work against what is physically determined from the time of Bigbang and trust its 'rationality' behind it. If it is indeed a some kind of substance or realm, we truely have something beyond matter, space and energy. However if it is really just about nothing other than those matters, as we are also strictly obeyed by the same principle, it will be irrational to believe that our brain is formed such a way that it can function as the rational tool and do something of its own will. I'm very intrigued by this idea. Nonetheless, these are the questions many brilliants come out with and suggest unthinkable answers. And I think it's wonderful to have open mind over these questions rather than use them as weapons to opposing ideas. I like your videos!
The physics of the universe determine our behavior, including the persistent illusion that we have free will.
@TheShinedownfan21 Yes. According to the suggested hypothesis, our mind can be illusion and have no 'free will', which I have no problem understanding. However, my real question is where does 'rationality' thereby come into play as nobody is actively engaging in purposeful discussions but cause-effects of physical properties. I still do feel like what we access and achieve as human beings are purposeful in many ways. The fact that you are putting that comment to perhaps 'convince others' is because you trust your own rationality and believe that you can access the truth. But in what basis do we trust our own when all of these are byproducts of determined chain reactions of Bigbang?
@@sammyson7665 Your will / heart comes from the transcendent / intuitive self, which is not a byproduct of atoms but a gift or property from a higher plane of existence. Coherence is designed into the Universe from the ground up - the formation of Something from Nothing (chaos) is strong evidence of this.
Just think about it. The entire human genome is only 20,000 genes. This means only 20,000 non-thinking, non-directed, unintelligent proteins gives rise to:
30 trillion cells and their relationships between each other
Over 200 differentiated cell types
The shape of 200 bones and joints
The distinct formation and regulatory mechanisms for 79 vital organs
The positions and plumbing for 800 lymphatic nodes
The positions and plumbing for 10 billion capillary tubes, plus feed and return paths to every organ and tissue
The location and wiring for 20 million neurons, which produce spatial coherence and sensation
The wiring of 100 billion neurons, plus 100 trillion axons, which produces a neurally elastic structure, capable of stable change, and of course results in consciousness (the machinery / house of the soul)
The immune system, capable of fighting any disease given enough time
The reproductive system, capable of building entirely new units from only two cells
There is no way 20,000 protein chunks is going to explicitly code for all of that. Instead, we see implicit design through some minimal amount of information. This is fine tuning beyond the theoretical conception. Look, the Universe is so finely tuned to produce coherence, even consciousness, that it “accidentally” made you. Haha yeah right! If you weren’t an accident, then your consciousness can’t be either.
@@TheShinedownfan21 I don't get how it works on a psychological level. Can you give an example of decision-making that we mistakenly consider free will but in fact it isn't?
@@feosTAS EEG tests show that when making a choice, the part of the brain responsible for choosing "lights up" before the subject is aware of the choice he is about to make. The choice is made unconsciously. Factors in our environment, including our genetic background and neurological wiring, determine all the decisions we make. The so-called individual self is just a bystander in all this, not even a real entity but an illusion projected by the thought process. There is no distinct "you," there is only the world of relationships and interactions that create that illusion. A man can do what he wills, but he cannot WILL what he wills.
You could not evolve even a single gene randomly from scratch. Let us calculate the probability of doing so. One of the simplest viral RNA sequences is only 400 base pairs long (and represents a very poor ribosomal molecule). Let's say this is all you need to start life, which is obviously not enough (we'd need at least 250 more genes at ~1000 base pairs each for a functional cell). Let there be a trillion trillion Earths, each with an ocean made entirely of amino acids (1.4E24 kg ocean per planet, 110 DA per amino acid, yielding 7.7E45 amino acids per planet). Let the entire sequence of these amino acids be combined into a single chain on each planet, giving the highest possibility of forming at least one correct sequence in the entire chain. Let these Earths randomly recombine their sequence of amino acids at a rate of a million times per second for 100 trillion years (until the last star dies). You are left with approximately 7.7E89 total combinations across this period. Now, let us set up the odds of assembling the correct sequence. The odds that an event occurs can be approximated as one minus the odds the event does not occur after a given number of trials. Let the probability that we get at least one sequence of 400 base pairs in this situation be: P = 1 - (1 - 1/(4^400)) ^ 7.7E89. Compute this formula in Wolfram Alpha to see what the odds are of life arising randomly. To those who will argue the Universe is infinite / infinitely cyclical, this would mean you also believe Planet Mountain Dew, Star Wars, and the Purple Flying Spaghetti Monster were/are/will be real. Yet you still do not believe an unmade creator / eternal designer is real? Let me put it this way. It is more reasonable to believe in a creator God than it is to believe life evolved randomly.
You're ignoring the arguably more bleak probability that a planet has all of the prerequisites to sustain life, not just long enough to support basic microbial life, but for the planet to harbor life long enough for evolution to reach a point where a species becomes sentient. That said, that's a horrendously bad reason for saying there has to be a God. I also never understood how people can tell themselves that the belief in a creator is somehow a more simple, elegant belief than a simply spontaneous universe because, were it true, it creates a host of new questions to be answered.
@@ESFoxwell I’ve come to the conclusion that God is more of some kind of inherent law, or unmade structure, from which all things arise. And it just so happens to be that such a structure / law is capable of producing intent. If natural laws created order from chaos, and humanity, who have intent, how much harder is it to believe a supernatural law, the fundamental law, from which physical reality projects, could produce order and intent? And if it is indeed true, then why not explore it? Tell me the last time we learned something new about the truth and had less questions because of it. You will find such thinking is a property of a dogmatic / religious mentality!
@@ESFoxwell The universe may not be full of intent, that is until you look at life itself. If astronauts were to discover a pile of rocks on the moon vaguely representing the message “HELLO HUMANS,” they could assume such a message was either left there randomly or intentionally. Indeed, the odds of rocks from a nearby volcano landing in that particular arrangement (assuming they are within a 5x46 grid, yielding an odds of about 1/2^(5x46)=1.8E-69 chance) which is still about 3.7E171 times more likely to occur than a single RNA gene arising spontaneously. Just because an ordered design is “naturally occurring” and microscopic does not make an unintentional, or causal, process an appealing solution. What I’m saying is, if you found that message on the moon, what would you believe? Are you in the “natural causes” camp? Not just any arrangement will do.
Unless life is abundent all over the universe. It might start quite easily under the right conditions.
Your lack of evolutionary knowledge is astounding
The fool says in his heart, there is no God.
The fool says in his heart there's god
And the wise man says it out loud.
Which universe are you referring to; there has been not one but many, and they did not come from nothing but dependent on on other factors.
God is a psychological coping mechanism invented by men, a symbolic character in the dramas we create about our own desires and fears. Just because Gold is a product of the human mind doesn't mean he isn't "real," other products of the human mind, such as language, law, art and customs, are real and not to be dismissed.
That’s the thing though, being in this earth isn’t about self. Because if it’s about self, that’s exactly how you wind up with people using God(of any religion) to justify their own personal desires even if if it’s wrong
How exactly did that mechanism help to cope tho? If I find myself in a deadly situation, how is coping going to help me, and why would it rely on a whim-based decision that an entity I know nothing about, exists? Like, let's not forget that if the concept of god was invented at some point, then people who invented it didn't know anything about it prior to that event, it simply didn't exist. And then they came up with a random collection of traits and it somehow helped them cope with bad situations. So successful at that, that it persisted across millennia.
@@feosTAS God represents a father figure in the Abrahamic religions, he gives rules to live by, assures a heavenly reward for obedience and punishes our enemies. Human social groups evolved with alpha males, tribal chieftains and patriarchs along with holy men to pass wisdom from generation to generation. We are mutually dependent on one another so we enforce rules of behavior. God personifies the benevolent rule giver because personal relationships operate on a deep emotional level. Just because God is a product of human culture does not mean he isn't real. Language, laws, customs and arts are also products of human culture, but they are real and important.
@@TheShinedownfan21 Abrahamic religions weren't the first ones to exist, and gods of those other religions were very different, willing to demand human sacrifice and whatnot. And even in old testament god doesn't really assure any heavenly reward. According to it, literally everyone who dies goes to hell, better people just suffer less there (tho I'm not sure if that aspect is explicitly addressed in the old testament directly).
Why does it sound logical that alpha males and wise people invented an entity that's beyond them, delegating their powers to that entity, and not presenting themselves as gods instead? And again, how is the idea of some benevolent rule giver helped them cope, especially given they invented it on a whim? Even then, lots of old religions were very cruel, doesn't look like something that is currently presented as a cope helper.
@@feosTAS The Egyptian, Greek, Hebrew and Norse gods evolved about 4000 years ago, and all feature father/king deities modeled after tribal chieftains. Before that, people worshipped nature spirits. Religions and their gods are a natural expression of human culture Christianity is in decline, most Jews don't take God literally, and only Islam is growing. All three religions have been fighting among themselves for centuries.
Timestamp to Steven hawking view?
Click bait.
7:20 "He (Hawking) concluded that God would not have had time..."
When hawking said time wasn't there before singularity itself contradicts the statement about denial of existence of time. It meams there is some period between singularity and big bang
What is the possible goal of nature. IS IT TO UNDERSTAND ITSELF?
Is there even a goal?
8:40
How about speed of black hole?
No GOD,
No Freewill,
Causes and Consequences,
You're on your own,
You are what you do...
If there’s no will, then how are what we do?
@@nemachloes your will, your choice, your decision come from,
Your Causes and Consequences, in your Consciousness Mind,
Sub Consciousness Mind and Unconsciousness Mind.
Donation, Sacrifice, Give up the world are somethings close to Freewill.
Just thinking...
youre saying a whole lot of nothing
@@kiddkuru Causes and Consequences,
You're on your own,
You are what you do...
@@boonraypipatchol7295 what are you yapping about
I like _klonusk_ . Interesting and none of these videos see to be aimed at any particular age group which is nice
The crisis today is that educators are introducing ideas that call good evil and evil good, leading to darkness. Darwinian ideologies are the foundation educators use to diminish God's word. “Axis of Beginning” is a play that can be read as a story and experienced as a stage performance to help support and educate young adults about God's creation.
Lets says, life is a process, a continuity and a mystery. Where do we came from?
I really appreciate your videos. Hopefully your subscribers and viewers will keep increasing 🇴🇲 ❤
where tf does that particle before the big bang come from tho
The question assumes that there was a place for it to come from. And that problem is infinite because even if you had an answer, the question remains. It's not a question of why or how it simply is.
Science has no need for supersition.
Do you think nothing exists outside of science?
@@SaltyTubeSock Yes
@@SaltyTubeSockthere likely are some alternative dimensions or universes out there where some act of nature we can’t explain yet through science caused our universe to appear. A sky wizard philosopher who’s completely all powerful creating the universe is ridiculous and illogical. The Bible is moral philosophy, nothing more
@@somethingelse9228 Then you don't know the definition of science lol
Excuse their piss week excuse of the pyramids built by a lost civilisation lost where where is their machinery I know they all died the same day and their machinery well just disappeared bingo have another bong you nerd scientist nuff nuffs
9:12 "I believe that human minds need it [God]" - that's right, as a child's mind needs Santa Claus, the Tooth Fairy or ... whatever it needs.
Yes there seems to be something innate in humans since the beginning of time to believe in this delusion
Guys, just let people believe what they believe and don’t harass them for it. They wont hurt you. 😊
@@SonicSatamAnimations But many do harass atheists for their beliefs, just check this comment section.
@@somethingelse9228 I mean don’t harass ANYONE for their beliefs. I am an atheist.
Here some questions is arising that who or what was the cause of Big bang theory or what was there before these universe or God? Even if we accept that there is god but there's a lot of religions and beliefs how can we prove that these religion is correct?
Humanity is on a journey and the unmistakable target and inevitable destination is Enlightenment: an Ultimate Answer to the Big Question of life, the Universe and Everything.
"The Theory of Everything would be the ultimate triumph of human reason, for then we would truly know the Mind of God" - Stephen Hawking.
Subsequently the Thing-in-itself at the centre and origin of the Universe will be revealed, in all of its beauty and simplicity, and all the Supernatural Sky-Gods will vanish in a puff of logic - leaving Humanity Enlightened and liberated from the chains of primitive superstition for the rest of time.
Sike, why can't humans make a nonliving thing into a living thing(consciousness, also explain)? If we can't even make a nonliving thing turn to a living thing with all of our knowledge, why trust nonintelligent processes to suddenly make DNA which is at least 3.2 billion thingamajigs long without a conscious mind to decide and guide it in the first place? Also, we can talk about the moral argument if you want.
Also, God is not a sky-god you atheists assume to believe lol, God is MORE than that. First of all, He exists outside the Universe and sustains everything.
@@user-qui91pvsw which god(s) specifically are u talking about?
also we are doing that with AI
I like the video and you earned a sub.
9:55 At the same time, many people do bad things thinking they are good things that their god wanted
that's what's unfortunate about religions ... there is also some bad. the terrifying thing here is bad can varies .. from simple .. to absolutely catastrophic .
@@cgiguyWell, people will believe what they believe.
The big bang sent soooo much recourses- wow ❤
Big bangs usually produce trouble.
But that time it was different. ❤❤❤
If god existed there would be no need to prove his existence
God is a spirit,energy.
Where his parts come from???
God is not like the creation
Creator did not fully fact check this video. Aristarchus lived 300bc, not 3000bc.
The physics stinks, too
@@davidkurz2977coz you can't understand it
YAH!!
BUT CAPTION IS ALL WAY CORRECT!!
@@davidkurz2977 may be it is because physics is not your cup of coffee
I wouldn’t ask the Pope’s opinion on Cosmology. Nor do I put great stock in Hawking’s religious views. The question of Go’d existence is not a scientific issue.
However. The Vatican Does have a telescope/observatory.
It's called "The Vatican Telescope"... ?
corresponds to the fear of god which reduces crimes, make a powerful laws in the whole world for those crimes. Then this god thing will come to an end.
If any God or religion keeps people in check, then by all means let's do it. "Treat people the way you want them to treat you" has worked for me and my family (plus I don't have to donate money), however I'm not going to push it anybody.
On earth, not everybody believes there is God, but in hell, everybody believes , 100%,
😂😂😂😂 what a brutal statement
GOD SAYS HE IS THE BEGINNING AND THE END THERE IS NO ONE WHO MADE GOD
Science is never about proving God is or is not. Science and religion are two completely different spheres of knowledge each trying to explain causality in it's own different ways. So bringing in an argument like a scientist does a research to prove or disapprove God wouldn't be a logical enough argument.
its wrong to say god vs science! this is right: GOD=SCIENCE
Then where did people come from
Where did zillions of tons of mass come from? And different types of mass.
Your last question, "who created God?" ...Like you cook fish 🐠, who cooked you? ... Creator n Creature is not same. U cannot apply same rules on creator n Creature..
Background music are disturbing to enjoying the video.
A pattern shows a small part of a bigger something, not necessarily the something.
the big bang occurred around 14billion years ago.
by definition 14billion years is infinitesimally small on an infinite time scale , even if we say time started at the big bang.
so our our life and the life of the universe is so small it cannot exist.
God either left us or never existed in the first place.
But why are the laws of the universe so definite, the laws haven’t change, our understanding has, and where ever there’s order there’s a mind behind, a single change in in the universe and everything collapses, the orderliness of the universe only proves God’s existence, there has to be someone watching over, else the world would be in flames
@@elvisanthony6817 it is in flames
@@duck323 God will leave us temporarily if we want Him to. But even then, He won't leave you alone for long. You have to keep pushing Him away. You can use distractions such as social media, news feeds, gossip, etc. to help push Him out of your consciousness. You can also spend as little time as possible outdoors, or wondering about spiritual things, reading, meditating or praying, and definitely do not ask God to help you. Because if you did, you might end up on a different path, and that would bring you closer to Him, and then you might actually accept His will for you.
@@elvisanthony6817 Then there is no god because entropy increases. We go from absolute order to increasing chaos as the universe ages.
Why we ask , "who" created the ....
Why is always "who"
Why "who" is necessary ?
Plz somebody answer my silly questions
You can never remove God from the equation. Well who created the big bang, the vast universe, and most importantly the human beings. I feel sorry for Steven Hawkins he was a great man who endured tremendous suffering. I truly believe he is with our holy father providing him comfort. God is all powerful he could create the universe as quickly as he wanted to. How does Steve Hawkins know that God didn't have enough time to create the universe!!!!
These answers came from the mind of Man called science. However there are things beyond our understanding. Unexplained phenomena that seems to defy logic. Things like feelings and emotions. Thought. Life and death. Good and evil. These concepts are what Professor Hawking wonder about.
It is a strange thing that no one has control over the universe, even if there were other universes. A powerful and resourceful being would not emerge from a another universe and become intelligent, resourceful, and resourceful to the point of learning how to control universes and times, learning how to create new universes, and learning technologies above everything we can imagine and have perfect biology. It gives him the possibility to live forever. The idea that our universe is out first and only one and there is not successful beings that overcome the nature of everything still confuses me. Or maybe becuse God gave us these perfect conditions and all of this is not luck.
There is no point in debating whether God exists or not. It is more than obvious that God exists. You don't need to have many studies to come to the conclusion that everything that exists has an intelligent mind behind it . Ignoring the existence of God because I don't like and don't want life to have a Creator is the same thing as ignoring his human existence . The whole universe , our solar system , the planet earth and everything that exists in show clearly , very clearly that God exist .
you mean the christian god? islam? hindu? how about the norse gods? zues perhaps? You have not seen all the evidence and yet you already conclude that a single all powerful being exist.
"it is more than obvious" is one of the worse evidence you can have.
@@chaschoune You cannot evolve even a single gene randomly from scratch. Do the math. The creation of life, and the evolution of life, is either guided or obeys some other law which eliminates almost all of the randomness. Life evolves over time, and we witness this progression, but I am telling you, there is not enough time nor material in this Universe to evolve one new gene randomly.
@@freznelite Nobody said that a single gene can randomly evolve from scratch. Millions of years is an incommensurate amount of time and your incredulity is not an argument.
@@chaschoune So you are agreeing the formation of life is not random? If so, then I would encourage you to accept the following facts:
1. Life itself requires a Design File, which is executed in the form of genetic code.
2. The Design File for the theoretical minimum viable organism is roughly 250 genes, averaging 1000 base pairs each.
3. The Design File did not happen by chance (i.e. as the result of a purely random process).
How do you propose such a large Design File could have arisen? Show me which mathematical / chemical / physical / biological law, that creates such a design file from scratch, and I will believe it could have happened through natural processes in this world alone. A complex design file implies Intent. Intent implies Intelligence. Intelligence implies a lot of things. Show me how a complex design file does not require intent.
And if you still think time is the explanation, let me tell you, 100 trillion years is not enough time for a trillion trillion organisms each with a genome the size of an ocean to evolve even one brand new gene purely randomly.
Let us calculate the probability of doing so. One of the simplest viral RNA sequences is only 400 base pairs long (and represents a very poor ribosomal molecule). Let's say this is all you need to build one new functional gene. Let there be a trillion trillion genomes, each of which contain a genetic code that weighs as much as the Earth's ocean (1.4E24 kg ocean, 110 DA per amino acid, yielding 7.7E45 amino acids per genome). Let the entire sequence of these amino acids be combined into a single chain, giving the highest possibility of forming at least one correct sequence in each chain. Let these massive organisms randomly recombine their sequence of amino acids at a rate of a million times per second for 100 trillion years (until the last star dies). You are left with approximately 7.7E89 total combinations across this period. Now, let us set up the odds of assembling one new, correct sequence. The odds that an event occurs can be approximated as one minus the odds the event does not occur after a given number of trials. Let the probability that we get at least one sequence of these particular 400 base pairs in this situation be: P = 1 - (1 - 1/(4^400)) ^ 7.7E89. Compute this formula in Wolfram Alpha to see what the odds are of randomly evolving one new gene from a trillion trillion ocean-sized genomes after 100 trillion years.
The best example we have of evolution is viral. Viruses steal genetic code from their hosts. Sometimes they create new genes in a semi-random fashion through recombination of existing code, copy defects, and even radiation defects. But they are not building entirely new genes from scratch (i.e. a brand new 400 base pair gene) without pulling this from their host's genetic code. So they are able to adopt genetic code, and evolve by attacking their hosts, but they are not able to synthesize a purely random new gene.
Actually men believe because they encounter , there are many Sumerian and Ancient texts that tells the the visitors of the stars and even the greatest and genius civilisations believed in God
Sometimes it feels scientists and science students has very limited or restricted thoughts self imposed on themselves when they illogically tries to negate an extra-universe entity called GOD without a rational response to the biggest question how anything including matter, energy, space, time and nothing came into existence. Can anyone has logical and firm reply how matter is created, how life came into being, how consciousness created itself!!!!? Biggest questions, not for those who are preoccupied in thinking themselves to be thinkers and scientists.
All your questions will be answered eventually. I'm sure there will not be any god needed in those equations.
we don't exist for nothing is all we need to understand....
@@millepill typical refuting response.
@@shaoorehsan9114 Well, so far there hasn't been a need for a god to answer any scientific question. In the natural sciences, one always continues to ask questions and further increase knowledge continuously. Eventually we will get answers to all scientific questions like how the universe came into being, how it will end, what fundamental particles exist, how all forces including gravity work and how life started. It is surprising that religious people think they have answers to everything by reading a book that was written in a time when we had no idea about physics like today.
@@jeffriesj75 There is no other meaning to life than to live it. We humans look for reasons for everything. I feel sorry for people who cannot find their own meaning in life. We are insignificant in and to the universe. All that exists is cause and effect; biological, chemical or physical.
If you truly have any intelligence than you will realize there is a grand architect of the universe and life
Increase the frequency of videos to show UA-cam that you're more active and ultimately let it's algorithm to push your videos and add hook in the starting 30 sec of the video
Well, he knows the answer now undoubtedly
It seems y'all don't understand and yes none of us do coz at the end of the day God is God...He answers to nobody...you don't expect Him to appear to anyone that does believe His existence...He owes nobody an explanation whatsoever...He gives He takes...He creates and He destroys...No human being can comprehend His power .. it's sucide... knkw this and have peace
So due to the title I'm inclined to add , the Bible said "the beginning was the Word, and the Word was with God, and the Word was God." " theory says nothing created something , and it spread out based on dark matter spacing plus solar systems .. (Essentially). The word is a vibration, on a wave length far greater than what we understand it's crazy science can agree 1 plus -1 is zero. But we can't recognize that vibrations/frequencies , are what pull our universe (s). God constructed his law for order , it would make sense the universe has law and order. I'm just saying multi theory and black holes are amazing to learn about. I'm failing to see the disconnect between religion and science. Maybe you can't fully understand the universe until you try to look at it from all angles . I'm just saying there's a connection between God and God's alike and our solar system(s)
Him?
Nothing of this universe could be understood,otherwise the peripheral and the turbulent is stopped functioning and it can never be used as a tool to validate and verify the cause of the existence. The space which is the most substratum of the tangible universe might be an intelligent spectrum that holds the whole universe with an unbelievable precision and accuracy. The intelligence by itself is enough to be , and itself beyond cause and effect which is circumscribed by the time that ultimately does not exist. Mystery of universe can only be demystified by the Mystic alone and once it is realised it will be beyond the time and the words .
So,let’s be inward and meditative than to be confused by the perplexities of intellectuals and scientists.
(O people, an example is presented, so listen to it. Indeed, those you invoke besides Allah will never create [as much as] a fly, even if they gathered together for that purpose. And if the fly should steal away from them a [tiny] thing, they could not recover it from him. Weak are the pursuer and pursued) quran 22 . surat alhaj(the pilgramige)
Rubber Dinghy Rapids, bro.
God is so all powerful that he is infinitely beyond the boundaries of science and human understanding. He is the greatest magician.
I'm really tired of hearing about the anthropomorphized concept of god. The assumption of a "who" created the universe is ridiculous. A more appropriate question would be "Why was the universe created." Science has the answer, not magic.
If you are a "Who" and not a "What," then why would you think your origin would not be from a Who???
@@maskofsorrow I am a 'Who' because my parents were 'Whos". That does not say anything about a supposed creator of the universe.
@@chaschoune And just who was the original parents??? That says everything about the Creator.
@@maskofsorrow there's a theory that the universe came from a long line of deaths and rebirths, expanding and shrinking based on the balance of natural forces. it's possible that it's creation was produced by itself and not an otherworldly force
@@victortang5076 And what started it in the first place? ie. What birthed it originally? Where did its consciousness and intelligence come from?
We have lot of people ...............❤
Pigeon hole 🕳️ ,the beginning? 😵💫🌀💭
Just because science cannot prove the existence or non-existence of God, doesn’t mean he is real or unreal. Faith is being sure of what we hope for and certain of what we can’t see. If a person doesn’t want to believe in God, he or she does not have to. Science today says they are up to 11 dimensions they use mathematics to speculate about these other realms. God and Heaven are in another dimension.
Time
Space
Cant help but go on in all directions
And any and everywhere are the center of both
Everything is for something else and a result of something else
Good and evil cant help but exist but you choose the one you want
If all matter just vanished would intelligence or potential for it vanish
If it couldnt vanish with matter then intelligence had to be before matter
And it had to be anyway
99 percent of the universe is space so if intelligence is only in life itself then intelligence is the smallest matter in the universe but still runs the show
Thought is not matter
So what was first thought or matter
So if matter makes itself.....
I believe in GOD infinity percent
But if GOD didnt exist i dont know how time and space still woulnt exist forever in all directions
What pencil could add or erase either one or erase intelligence
Thanks for discussing these notions. People generally believe that belief in God is contrary to science. In fact, it is the most logical conclusion. There is a starting point for everything. It does not matter what religion you belong to, the fact is that God is a deity that exists and is uncreated. Even if someone does not believe in any particular religion, he / she will definitely reach this unavoidable conclusion. It's all about thinking without bias.
false. Belief in any god is illogical. No proof or evidence for any of them. Also false...you don't know if there's a starting point for everything. Thts an assertion you've made with no proof or evidence of being true. The universe could be very well infinite...you or I don't know tht. This guy in the video saying before the big bang there was nothing isn't even scientific. Science doesn't even say there was "nothing". How can something be created from "nothing", when no one can explain what "nothing" is
Well said 👍
tht shit is not well said...lol...its a bunch of bs tht christians want to believe, but its nonsense@@SonicSatamAnimations
Aristarchus of Samos (/ˌærəˈstɑːrkəs/; Greek: Ἀρίσταρχος ὁ Σάμιος, Aristarkhos ho Samios; c. 310 - c. 230 BC)
Even nothing has to come from something no matter what god is real 🖤
Nothing by definition doesn't come from anywhere.
EVEN SIMULATION THEORY IS VALID, WHO CREATES THE SIMULATION?
Elon
Stephen can finally speak...itssss hottttttttttttt helpppppppp i was wronggggg
hawking stated that
'philosophy' is dead -
only science and materialism
explain the whole universe,
little that he knew that
he had proclaimed his
own flawed, atheistic philosophy.
Everyone has a flawed philosophy to some degree or another.
@@freznelite Absolutely agree. Hawking's 'flawed' philosophy - being an eminent figure - had added fuel to atheistic movement to a 'greater' degree.
"They professed to be wise but
they are nothing but fools!"
Hawking said creating negative and positive, but man and woman is not created by such logic. And this topic mentioned about where is God from? God is existing from the beginning when there is no logic. And every life and matter are created by God.
What is distracting you from understanding it its "Time" which is inside the creation(Existence), forget about it for a moment, now Nothingness(NoTime Nonexistence, absolute absence of something you can call Existence, no container, no void because that would be Existence), the nothingness would persist forever because cannot be nothing else. You can infer there was always something because there is not nothingness because nothingness can only exist as nothingness, the nothingness never existed because there is Existence and the Existence cannot come from nothingness because nothingness can only persist and exist as nothingness. Therefore you can infer the Creation(Existence) did not come from nothingness because nothingness can only exist as nothingness, if True that there never was such as thing as nothingness THEN the Existence its primordial its always been there because there was not nothingness before. If there ever was nothingness before Creation THEN the creation could not exist, the nothingness can only be nothingness and if nothingness ever existed then nothingness would persist until now. If there never was nothingness THEN the primordial Existence was never created. If the Existence was never created THEN its Eternal(No Beginning, No End). How do you know if has not End, because time and creation did come from that primordial Existence if our universe is the only thing there is then if the universe become nothingness Still the Existence will Exist and persist because the nothingness(Absolute absence of Existence) never Existed. Its complicated as proving 1+1=2 which is 360 pages long.
Hawkings wasnt that intelligent to take on his word, he was just a glorified scientist because of his disability, awesome work due to dedicated time to his work and the UK culture that tend to always glorify people which is not bad thing. Also he probably hated the idea of god because of his illness. I like Christopher Langan's work better.
The statement God created the universe in 6 days in the bible and God created the universe through big bang or other method in billions of years are both correct statement. In God’s perspective He created everthing in 6 days in his own time. In Einstein’s theory of relativity time depends in the observer in two individuals and can be different if one is at motion. So his 6 days of creation in the bible can be a billion of years to us. I saw one astrophysicist said that we are still on the 7th day of God because in the bible from 1st day to 6th day it was describe that the sun rises and the sun sets. But on the 7th day when God rest the sun was not written it sets.
God Bless us all
How does life exist and not God?
3 powerful/obvious reasons why God actually exists(starting with the least to the most powerful/obvious reason)
1)The Big Bang Theory says the world began with a tiny mass of particles exploding, then giant plants just came out of the tiny mass of particles and perfectly fell into place. How did giant planets fit in a tiny mass of particles? The Big Bang Theory thinks everything came from nothing and it just happened by chance, it doesn't make sense. The universe is complicated, it makes more sense for a God to have planned a detailed universe, the universe has no flaws.
2)The Theory of Evolution shows a gorilla turning into a Man but there are 2 genders. How were girls made? It makes sense for a God to have planned and designed 2 different genders.
3) (most important reason)In the Bible Jesus said when the end of the world is near human knowledge of technology will increase, people will make wrong moral(religious) decisions and love of the Church will grow cold. Jesus' prophecies(promises) have already come true. All of these have happened, tech is more advanced and less people are religious. The Bible knew these things would happen way before it happened, it was written a long time ago. This means there is a God who knows the future. The Bible couldn't have been written by humans because humans can't predict the future.
God has always been here, he has no beginning or end. We humans don't understand him fully.
The Day of Judgement is near. If you see people on the internet saying God doesn't exist don't believe them. Humans don't fully understand God. Humans make mistakes. It is never too early to start doing the right but it can be too late. This temporary life doesn't matter, it will end soon. Your eternal(forever) life matters because once you are in heaven/hell you could be there forever. Next time you think of sinning ask yourself, is it worth it even if I go to hell? You'll never regret trusting, loving and obeying God. Share this information with as many people as you can, they need to know this.
S🙄 , After All this Beautiful Illustrations & Explanations , You Still Remain As Agnost 🤔
Is there a cow ?
one can say god exists one can also say god doesnt exist.what you say doesnt matter.it is what you believe.your question will be answered one of two ways.when you have an experience that convinces you there is a god.or after you die.the only advise i tell people is keep an open mind.for should it happen to be true and having had an experience like i have had.i would rather die having some belief of it then none at all.if you tell people there isnt a god.or if a person wants to believe there isnt.when your time comes and you get there.if you were god and someone didnt believe in you what would you do?it is a subject one must really think about.
If he truly wanted to be believed he would've made that clear.
study hibbs particles the gods particles
Up until 9 minutes it was great. Then came this god thing. Why?
I am evidence God exists. The universe is evidence God exists.
Mabiwa. Xikwembu xikona😮
God created time as well.
If God explain everything to human being then where is the reason we are living for if we know everything then we people will not afraid of anything even death coz of knowing soul exist. But if u think too much God will distract ur mine. That's all plan of god
good point
In science Evey subject in word Nature or Naturally means GOD . GOD a completely science
All shall know me
N0 1 w1ll t3ll another 😊
The pope had said the Earth was flat and the sun revolved around the earth, Bruno a genius said the Earth was round and revolved around the sun and the Catholics tortured, burned him alive
9:56 - I disagree . Proof ? Look at the middle east and all religion related wars . Since we have the capacity to “ believe” anything without proof , humans clash because of it ; different religions . So i completely disagree ..
History is your proof lol
Too late to ask him now ,,he died and fell into one of those black holes,, ,,, hell ,,, dark never to escape,