@@seagull4432 Wouldn't work? I'm an engineer and I see nothing as to why it wouldn't work, at the size that's depicted in the video, it would have no issues. Stick to minecraft and let adults decide what will/won't work, little boy. It will work, but it being viable in real life as a product that a military would want is another question.
@@edenassos Not sure about its ability to stand on its wheels/tracks, but everything else seems half viable. You'd probably end up with an anemic powerplant and constant reliability issues from the complex hydraulics though. There's also a bunch of weird features, like the dozer blade that looks too small to be useful.
@@edenassos sorry mister engineer, but the list of reason why such a vehicle wouldnt be mass produced and wouldnt be viable is beyond your, and sorry, "engineering skills" it seems. thing is the more moving parts the more it is easy to have problems, a tank less well armored than a abram and 3 times the cost when it is less effective THEN A FUCKING ABRAM IN THE FIRST PLACE wouldnt be great in any way. and thats just the cost because this thing would probably be powered by electicity giving the fact that the size of the vehicle wouldnt allow for a proper gas engine of any kind with the a correct fuel amount, and thus i can only estimate the cost to be singnificantly higher than a abram which as been produced in mass since the 70's. i wont elaborateon all the other reasons why the vehicle wouldnt work but there ya go, the roots of things! please THINK like a engineer and not a random youtube commentator.
> Have a very autonomous and high tech tanquette > Add a feature to sneak around corners > Literally the only thing exposed around the corner is the driver. > GENIUS
@@yesmybagel2751 The track design leads to horrid ground pressure, they little trolley wheels are useless, the pilot’s seat is atrocious, it carries anti-tank missile, and is just the stupidest bloody thing I have seen in a long time. It is useless for anything than a cardboard mock-up to show off at a cosplay convention.
What about the engine, fuel, battery, radiator, coms, ammo feeds, air-con, field repair kits, cameras, sensors, cargo loads, provisions, water, personal weapons, networked computer system, targeting system, weapon dampening, shock absorption, and most importantly, how are you going to control all of the dozens of sub-systems in a cabin smaller than a coffin?
@@revolution_is_the_key yeah, Plus driving and shooting is difficult at the same time. That’s the reason why most tanks have a separate gunner and driver.
I have an issue with the tires, I don't think at 3:14 the tires could just lift like that. I could see damage over the friction and weight could be a problem getting that tank up on those wheels. What would be cool is to have the tank be able to move in a multi directional. Have you seen Ghost in the Shell. Those tanks seem a little more simplistic and at the same time functional. I like the design though. Pretty cool.
while the model itself is pretty well done, the actual usability of this design is abysmal, theres no reason to cover the missiles like that, missiles arent covered on several platforms, and here all it does is limit the human operators visibility, getting in and out looks like a massive pain in the ass. the wheels are way too small for any meaningful usability, and multi-tracked designs look cool, but are generally inferior to full tracked designs. While I will admit I have also made some "ultimate ground vehicles" they practically dont make sense. Feels more like how many guns we can stick on this thing, rather than is it worth it. Again though, as a model, very nicely done
there was no info on power supply, engine, and armor thickness. I doblt this thing can protect itself from anything over "small arms fire" but I enjoy the idea of a tank that can corner peek indoors. The problem is that this thing is so situational and niche it's probably not worth the cost. not to mention training and operational disorientation.
Including space for a pilot despite remote control etc. increases flexibility and helps if there is lot of jamming etc. but also takes away major advantage of unmanned vehicles in not needing space for a human. Without it the robot could be lower/smaller or just carry more fuel/batteries/ammo on the middle, maybe extra sensors where the pilot's head is.
The same still applies, with batteries, coolant, motors, guidance systems, motor controllers and sensors. Granted, motors are more compact, but realistically you'd probably be better off with a standard 6/8 wheel chain driven tank drive. Smaller transmission, less complexity, lower cost, easier operation, easier code, at the cost of a marginally lower mobility in certain situations (offset by human operator mobility).
There is no need for windows in this concept, the windows only weaken the structure. We need cameras in all directions and a VR glasses for the driver.
@@industrialdesign2969 Very vulnerable, very claustrophobic, you didn’t think where to put all the ammo, autoloading systems, and etc. I think that this can be something like deployed by tanks for self defense, due to its small size.
И как ему одному отвечать за столько функций? Он будет перегружен, боевая эффективность почти 0. Да и ходовая часть вызавает вопросы. Зачем было делать 3 гусеницы на борт? Да еще и оставлять промежуток, в котором аппарат может сесть на днище? Дорого и неэффективно. Про бронированме даже спрашивать не буду, там много брони не влезет. Хотя огромный лобовой триплекс станет прекрасной мишенью для ослепления боевой единицы.
И как ему одному отвечать за столько функций? Он будет перегружен, боевая эффективность почти 0. Да и ходовая часть вызавает вопросы. Зачем было делать 3 гусеницы на борт? Да еще и оставлять промежуток, в котором аппарат может сесть на днище? Дорого и неэффективно. Про бронированме даже спрашивать не буду, там много брони не влезет. Хотя огромный лобовой триплекс станет прекрасной мишенью для ослепления боевой единицы.
A good half of all the features are impossible to realistically: A) Have the internal machinery for. and B) Have enough engines & hydraulic pumps to operate all the moving parts within the allocated space.
This strikes me as a very underrated design. It's vulnerable, yes, but given the fact that it's roughly the volume of, say, a pickup truck (albeit much heavier than one, hypothetically), I would actually expect as much. Setting aside the vulnerability, however, what I see here is a VERY versatile craft that you could deploy practically ANYWHERE. It's practically the foot soldier of war-based vehicles, which would be perfect for urban warfare, guerilla warfare, STEALTH warfare, maybe not ideal for open fields or anything of that nature though... The limited anti-vehicular capabilities are a bit on the underwhelming side, plus a few hypotheticals in the design seem to blatantly ignore the concept of vehicular mass, but other than that, it's actually brilliant...
I like the ability to shift the control cabin side to side, but this will only ever be useful in light combat, riot control, or disaster area operations. Also, I'm very curious as to what could possibly power all that functionality in such a tiny chassis. Could probably only operate for thirty minutes at most.
aaaa qartulia es chemisa? wow ra magaria, magram zevita natsili mdzime tu gamova tavis gverdit gadatsevis dros gadavardeba, tanac kaci ver chaeteva, ufro didi unda gamovides sinamdvileshi
Танкетка. Забытое старое. Проходили уже. Очень эффектно! Но неэффективно! Главное: 1.Нет брони. Совсем нет. 12,7 будет пробивать. 2.Запас хода? Под вопросом. 3.Верхние пулеметы как перезаряжать? Малый БК. 4.Городской бой? Слишком крупногабаритный, и хлопотно. Проще беспилотников - роботов. Без личного состава! 5.Один боец это мало! Один механ, другой стрелок должен быть. 6.Обзор вопрос? Можно куча электроники и камеры во все стороны. Но тогда нужен постоянный боевой режим. 7.Конструктивно, слишком много механики, куча траков, Катков. Избыточно. Наличие гидравлики это не есть достоинство. При поломке 1 боец будет ремонтом заниматься? См. пункт выше 5. 8.Высокий центр тяжести. Может опрокинутся. ДА, может встать. Верю. А зачем допускать эту возможность , а потом преодолевать ее? 9. Достоинство - классный музон! 10.Пацаны, тыкните +, пусть буржуи думают что тут чет крутое написано!
This looks to me just to be an early Halo (the video game) armor, just more complex and less human. If you are going for small anime mec this is a good start but there is too little on the thing. What this "Sokhumi" carries could be carried by under a conservative estimate 4/5 people and more liberally 7/8 people; a relatively small squad which ever estimate you chose. The "Sokhumi" has [in order] an AT missile, which can be carried by one man and can have more ammo than the presumably two shots shown (carried by the squad) and can (depending on the weapon system) be more adaptive/carry more than the loaded ammo types and have other firing modes. Smoke grenades can be carried by unit member and fired from a rifle mounted launcher or from a designated grenade launching small arms system. What ever interested governments would rather just pay the funeral expenses of a few dead service members then pay the day to day cost of one of these units; the only real advantage "Sokhumi" units have over a small similarly equipped squad is the (when manned) risk of only one service member being a risk as opposed to a squad.
@@industrialdesign2969 soon drones and robots like those at Boston dynamics and even one's like that will patrol the streets all interconnected not to protect the law but to inforce a sense of unease further taking humans away from what makes them human . there connection there peace and above all else there love ,it is happening now and has been happening for a long time .
When the Russians watch the Tank Police anime.... But, in all actuality, instead of the fixed package consisting of all the weapons shown, The individual weapons need to be completely removable to provide a mission specific alteration. Want patrol duty, then drop the 40mm and 50cal/12.5mm and the rocket launchers and add a 2nd 7.62mm MG. Want light anti-vehicle mission, go against light mechanized infantry. Ditch the 7.62 MG and go with the 50cal and 40mm. Anti-armor? Plug in the light MG and add more rocket launchers. Civilian missions are also possible with this. Ditch the weaponry and add flame suppression for search and rescue of buildings or downed aircraft. The weapons mounts could be fitted with connections to accept gurneys and pods to transport injured persons to safety and medical assistance. It would be tremendously useful in fighting forest and wild fires over rough terrain. There are many possibilities for equipment such as this, and not all applications would be of a military nature. I say continue to study and develop the concept.
its quality but like the Panther the frontal armour its angled right to a flat plate which means a shell could bounce right into the center of the vehicle that and HEAT-FS would have huge fun with this
I wonder where you are going to put all the actuators and hydraulics that are required to power the systems shown and I don't even mention the space necessary for the engine, space for the fuel/fuel cells required. Last but nıt least, ammunition? Edit: I wrote this comment mid-way into the video and didn't even see the wheels... Wheels for a crawler machine. I believe there will be propellers on Version 2. Nice animation, cheers.
In my opinion, armoured vehicles will become more and more automated or remotely operated. Compact, faster, highly maneuverable and flexible tactical vehicles, capable of fast, coordinated, precise and decisive attacks, will probably be the most efficient and rational way to go.
Mass production of much, much cheaper ATVs, SxS width, with machine gun mounts and 2 out of 10 with 4 Javelin mounts, obstacle avoidance, waypoint destination progammable, artificial intelligence, motion and infared detection and fire at will ability used enmass of 100 to 300 at a time, on suicide missions, at night, to punch a hole in an enemy line and, if any are left, to proceed deep into the rear sowing panic, all without a single soldiers life at risk is, I think, a very good idea that could be a game changer. Should be able to travel 100 miles on a tank of a gas/hybrid engine with all having waypoints ( many with different routes of getting to the waypoints) put in at the 100 mile mark, so that, in case some make it through, the most efficient use will be made out of them as they continue deeper behind enemy lines killing as they go.
i mean its a good tank or APC concept but in reality those tracks would be the main target by infantry and the main components are too exposed to the outside environment and mostly its way too complex like imagine trying to repair that thing.
I don't know it's purpose, and I know less of how the materials hold up or how much engine you can fit into that little thing alongside ammo for two machine guns. But what I can give you an opinion on is that one or two well placed large caliber shots can mess up those fancy hydraulic piston cabin real quick. Even if I'm wrong, this can fail in more places. Stop trying to do everything at once and have multiple variants for different purposes in a squad. You know, like humans do.
Looks like a fancy coffin to me. There’s no substantial armor The tracks don’t look like that can go over anything that isn’t paved If it’s electric the battery getting it will be game over You need a PhD to pilot the damn thing There’s nowhere to store ammo or reload it easily Looks cramped as hell An IED Hell even a toe popper would blow the crap out of it And finally I can’t see a single job that will do well, not anti-aircraft not antitank not anti-personnel unless they’re in a middle of a field you can’t clear building with it and I bet the moment it hits mud or sand it will cease to function.
I have some great concerns regarding the name of a potential death machine, the way YT algorithm works and the part of the world where I live Edit: watched other vids on this channel. Oh yeah, i'ts all coming together
@@industrialdesign2969 На данный момент времени, слишком технически сложный и ещё долго будет проигрывать узкоспециализированным видам техники. По сути это вариант экзоскелета.
looks cool, but too many moving parts equals to many posible failures in combat, i also would take out the pilot and use a remote control, you have already hunter killer plataforms with atgm and cannons in smaller version
... The fact that I actually have a fictional tank design (VERY science fictional, as in utilizing many small-ish RTGs for engine power (each wheel of the track is powered by an encased pair of them to accommodate for the expected low output) and plasma-based weaponry (takes up the entirety of the turret to supply two cannons) that's ALSO called "The Rook" has me slightly uncomfortable...
@@user-yz2yu5kr4v Do- ... Do you not know what RTGs are? Wait, right, I should probably assume not since- Right... RTGs (or Radioisotopic Thermoelectric Generators) are not necessarily limited by distance, but by lifetime, because they're essentially a PASSIVE variant to nuclear energy compared to the ACTIVE reactors you may well be aware of. They're also safer and MUCH more compact as well, you could practically make them whatever size you want, hypothetically, or at least to my knowledge. Anyways, the lifespan and shielding required in the encasing depends on the fuel source. With the source I looked up when researching this providing examples, the most ideal one that stood out to me was Plutonium (low shield + 88-year half life), though there are safer options as well as MUCH more powerful ones (though these would require a lot more shielding), but essentially this is the safest "middle ground." I'm not familiar with their usage in real life, but the concept certainly seems viable in this case.
A designer's wet dream is an engineer's nightmare.
ah yes plus the fact that the vehicle itself wouldnt work to start with
so much moving parts
@@seagull4432 Wouldn't work? I'm an engineer and I see nothing as to why it wouldn't work, at the size that's depicted in the video, it would have no issues. Stick to minecraft and let adults decide what will/won't work, little boy. It will work, but it being viable in real life as a product that a military would want is another question.
@@edenassos Not sure about its ability to stand on its wheels/tracks, but everything else seems half viable. You'd probably end up with an anemic powerplant and constant reliability issues from the complex hydraulics though.
There's also a bunch of weird features, like the dozer blade that looks too small to be useful.
@@edenassos sorry mister engineer, but the list of reason why such a vehicle wouldnt be mass produced and wouldnt be viable is beyond your, and sorry, "engineering skills" it seems. thing is the more moving parts the more it is easy to have problems, a tank less well armored than a abram and 3 times the cost when it is less effective THEN A FUCKING ABRAM IN THE FIRST PLACE wouldnt be great in any way. and thats just the cost because this thing would probably be powered by electicity giving the fact that the size of the vehicle wouldnt allow for a proper gas engine of any kind with the a correct fuel amount, and thus i can only estimate the cost to be singnificantly higher than a abram which as been produced in mass since the 70's. i wont elaborateon all the other reasons why the vehicle wouldnt work but there ya go, the roots of things! please THINK like a engineer and not a random youtube commentator.
Too difficult, comlex and vulnerable. Have many "achilles heel"
Well, considering it is not a product of design bureau, but some "academy of art", that is expectable
has several
Can be take down by a single 40mm HEAT grenade from a m203.
Cheaper more expendable than manned Abrams tanks.
> Have a very autonomous and high tech tanquette
> Add a feature to sneak around corners
> Literally the only thing exposed around the corner is the driver.
> GENIUS
You have to sometimes make sacrifices...
@@seagull4432 for what?
What does this vehicle do well?
This vehicle is stupid but i think its not for fighting other tanks.
@@yesmybagel2751 The track design leads to horrid ground pressure, they little trolley wheels are useless, the pilot’s seat is atrocious, it carries anti-tank missile, and is just the stupidest bloody thing I have seen in a long time. It is useless for anything than a cardboard mock-up to show off at a cosplay convention.
@@sheeplord4976 i guess its only used to fight the trash compactor
This looks really fun, but also needlessly complex. Something straight out of sci-fi computer game or a movie. It's very original.
But very vulnerable and probably not gonna be used, its most vulnerable parts is the tracks, kill the tracks and you stop the vehichle.
@@infinity5288 or actually the track bearings
Skynet moment
No sh*t he even used a marine from Halo, the Game with a nearly invincible super soldier that can literally take on an army and win
@@infinity5288 were vulnerably when alone, but as a support or people controlling device very usable I think.
Everyone gangsta till the tank start playing peekaboo.
Anti Vehicle Rockets be like: "ah another food"
unless vehicle has an active protection system on it
Ever heard of Trophy APS?
@@edenassos lol we are talking about the same thing
@@myearshurtnoone1367 Yessss, great minds think alike.
What about the engine, fuel, battery, radiator, coms, ammo feeds, air-con, field repair kits, cameras, sensors, cargo loads, provisions, water, personal weapons, networked computer system, targeting system, weapon dampening, shock absorption, and most importantly, how are you going to control all of the dozens of sub-systems in a cabin smaller than a coffin?
despite being operated by 1 SINGLE person...
@@revolution_is_the_key yeah, Plus driving and shooting is difficult at the same time.
That’s the reason why most tanks have a separate gunner and driver.
@@EmbeddedWithin Is no one going to mention the fact that the leaning turret would chop off the operator's feet since they go down into the main hull?
@@battleoid2411 yes, exactly
@@battleoid2411 at 2:45 you can see a small part sticking out of the bottom of the turret, presumably the operator's feet.
Don't know how it would perform or even come to existence in real world but its awesome for any game.
I have an issue with the tires, I don't think at 3:14 the tires could just lift like that. I could see damage over the friction and weight could be a problem getting that tank up on those wheels. What would be cool is to have the tank be able to move in a multi directional. Have you seen Ghost in the Shell. Those tanks seem a little more simplistic and at the same time functional. I like the design though. Pretty cool.
Thank You!
it looks like it'd be more at home in scrap mechanic, especially with that wheels issue in particular
@@shaldurprime7154 Oh so I've seen these new tires on DJI tanks and they could be really useful. I'm sure the weight becomes and issue over time.
while the model itself is pretty well done, the actual usability of this design is abysmal, theres no reason to cover the missiles like that, missiles arent covered on several platforms, and here all it does is limit the human operators visibility, getting in and out looks like a massive pain in the ass. the wheels are way too small for any meaningful usability, and multi-tracked designs look cool, but are generally inferior to full tracked designs. While I will admit I have also made some "ultimate ground vehicles" they practically dont make sense. Feels more like how many guns we can stick on this thing, rather than is it worth it. Again though, as a model, very nicely done
there was no info on power supply, engine, and armor thickness. I doblt this thing can protect itself from anything over "small arms fire" but I enjoy the idea of a tank that can corner peek indoors. The problem is that this thing is so situational and niche it's probably not worth the cost. not to mention training and operational disorientation.
Probably it’s better without pilot, but actually a remote operator
Including space for a pilot despite remote control etc. increases flexibility and helps if there is lot of jamming etc. but also takes away major advantage of unmanned vehicles in not needing space for a human. Without it the robot could be lower/smaller or just carry more fuel/batteries/ammo on the middle, maybe extra sensors where the pilot's head is.
RPG god Jamsheed would have a field day with this
Its a nightmare if u must stay in that thing , trust me...
especially if you're claustrophobic
With such a complex hydraulic system, there would no longer be enough space for the engine, fuel and ammunition!
This is a concept. And is an electric vehicle. Everything is provided conceptually...
The same still applies, with batteries, coolant, motors, guidance systems, motor controllers and sensors. Granted, motors are more compact, but realistically you'd probably be better off with a standard 6/8 wheel chain driven tank drive. Smaller transmission, less complexity, lower cost, easier operation, easier code, at the cost of a marginally lower mobility in certain situations (offset by human operator mobility).
I'm looking at it from a design point of view, and I love it!
The way it looks around the corner is frightening. I like it
this is great if lego built this bad boi tank
There is no need for windows in this concept, the windows only weaken the structure. We need cameras in all directions and a VR glasses for the driver.
"Identify target!" "Absolutely!" "On my way!"
Underrated comment
very good. I also agree with this in order to protect the tanks
Bravo!
@@industrialdesign2969 Very vulnerable, very claustrophobic, you didn’t think where to put all the ammo, autoloading systems, and etc.
I think that this can be something like deployed by tanks for self defense, due to its small size.
military: this will go great with everything
This will not go great, it defies the laws of physics!
И как ему одному отвечать за столько функций? Он будет перегружен, боевая эффективность почти 0. Да и ходовая часть вызавает вопросы. Зачем было делать 3 гусеницы на борт? Да еще и оставлять промежуток, в котором аппарат может сесть на днище? Дорого и неэффективно. Про бронированме даже спрашивать не буду, там много брони не влезет. Хотя огромный лобовой триплекс станет прекрасной мишенью для ослепления боевой единицы.
И как ему одному отвечать за столько функций? Он будет перегружен, боевая эффективность почти 0. Да и ходовая часть вызавает вопросы. Зачем было делать 3 гусеницы на борт? Да еще и оставлять промежуток, в котором аппарат может сесть на днище? Дорого и неэффективно. Про бронированме даже спрашивать не буду, там много брони не влезет. Хотя огромный лобовой триплекс станет прекрасной мишенью для ослепления боевой единицы.
@@infinity5288 and logistics!
2:22 i think there will be center of mass problem there
But cool tho
key components exposed , tall(easier to hit) most likely loud as hell and impractical
A good half of all the features are impossible to realistically:
A) Have the internal machinery for.
and
B) Have enough engines & hydraulic pumps to operate all the moving parts within the allocated space.
Cool looking but as fragile as a crystal cup. It would be a great remote control toy if made on 1/50 scale
This is really² cool😃 good job
Amazing I'm so amaze from this new military invention!
Greetings from the Philippines
This strikes me as a very underrated design. It's vulnerable, yes, but given the fact that it's roughly the volume of, say, a pickup truck (albeit much heavier than one, hypothetically), I would actually expect as much. Setting aside the vulnerability, however, what I see here is a VERY versatile craft that you could deploy practically ANYWHERE. It's practically the foot soldier of war-based vehicles, which would be perfect for urban warfare, guerilla warfare, STEALTH warfare, maybe not ideal for open fields or anything of that nature though... The limited anti-vehicular capabilities are a bit on the underwhelming side, plus a few hypotheticals in the design seem to blatantly ignore the concept of vehicular mass, but other than that, it's actually brilliant...
He's gonna give people heart attack with those hide and seek moments
probls the only kills this thing's gonna rack up
Innovative and creative idea
I like the ability to shift the control cabin side to side, but this will only ever be useful in light combat, riot control, or disaster area operations. Also, I'm very curious as to what could possibly power all that functionality in such a tiny chassis. Could probably only operate for thirty minutes at most.
this is why we dont let designers have fun
this is a stupid vehicle.... AND I LOVE IT. Look at it peaking around the corner! it's so cute! I want one!
RTX-65 GUNTANK EARLY TYPE "現実版ガンタンク"だ！
2:33, hello there "はい、ひょっこりはん"
aaaa qartulia es chemisa? wow ra magaria, magram zevita natsili mdzime tu gamova tavis gverdit gadatsevis dros gadavardeba, tanac kaci ver chaeteva, ufro didi unda gamovides sinamdvileshi
3:58 ah yes, nothing like strolling around in a building with a golf cart sized tank
Танкетка. Забытое старое. Проходили уже.
Очень эффектно! Но неэффективно!
Главное:
1.Нет брони. Совсем нет. 12,7 будет пробивать.
2.Запас хода? Под вопросом.
3.Верхние пулеметы как перезаряжать? Малый БК.
4.Городской бой? Слишком крупногабаритный, и хлопотно. Проще беспилотников - роботов. Без личного состава!
5.Один боец это мало! Один механ, другой стрелок должен быть.
6.Обзор вопрос? Можно куча электроники и камеры во все стороны. Но тогда нужен постоянный боевой режим.
7.Конструктивно, слишком много механики, куча траков, Катков. Избыточно. Наличие гидравлики это не есть достоинство. При поломке 1 боец будет ремонтом заниматься? См. пункт выше 5.
8.Высокий центр тяжести. Может опрокинутся. ДА, может встать. Верю. А зачем допускать эту возможность , а потом преодолевать ее?
9. Достоинство - классный музон!
10.Пацаны, тыкните +, пусть буржуи думают что тут чет крутое написано!
yes
perfect just what needs a nerf gun attached to it and kids can play for hours on end
This looks to me just to be an early Halo (the video game) armor, just more complex and less human. If you are going for small anime mec this is a good start but there is too little on the thing. What this "Sokhumi" carries could be carried by under a conservative estimate 4/5 people and more liberally 7/8 people; a relatively small squad which ever estimate you chose. The "Sokhumi" has [in order] an AT missile, which can be carried by one man and can have more ammo than the presumably two shots shown (carried by the squad) and can (depending on the weapon system) be more adaptive/carry more than the loaded ammo types and have other firing modes. Smoke grenades can be carried by unit member and fired from a rifle mounted launcher or from a designated grenade launching small arms system.
What ever interested governments would rather just pay the funeral expenses of a few dead service members then pay the day to day cost of one of these units; the only real advantage "Sokhumi" units have over a small similarly equipped squad is the (when manned) risk of only one service member being a risk as opposed to a squad.
that's good for RC toy
Nice Tank with robotic pilot control Autopilot autonomous Transportation and Remote control characteristics
Thank You Very Much!
In a smaller scale , pleased to introduce your new sidewalk peace officer .
Please clarify what you mean.
@@industrialdesign2969 soon drones and robots like those at Boston dynamics and even one's like that will patrol the streets all interconnected not to protect the law but to inforce a sense of unease further taking humans away from what makes them human . there connection there peace and above all else there love ,it is happening now and has been happening for a long time .
@@shanechandler1018 Let's hope for positive...
@@industrialdesign2969 huh
I would love to have one of those machines ❤❤❤❤😮😮😮😮💯💯💯💯 for my collections.
When the Russians watch the Tank Police anime.... But, in all actuality, instead of the fixed package consisting of all the weapons shown, The individual weapons need to be completely removable to provide a mission specific alteration. Want patrol duty, then drop the 40mm and 50cal/12.5mm and the rocket launchers and add a 2nd 7.62mm MG. Want light anti-vehicle mission, go against light mechanized infantry. Ditch the 7.62 MG and go with the 50cal and 40mm. Anti-armor? Plug in the light MG and add more rocket launchers. Civilian missions are also possible with this. Ditch the weaponry and add flame suppression for search and rescue of buildings or downed aircraft. The weapons mounts could be fitted with connections to accept gurneys and pods to transport injured persons to safety and medical assistance. It would be tremendously useful in fighting forest and wild fires over rough terrain. There are many possibilities for equipment such as this, and not all applications would be of a military nature. I say continue to study and develop the concept.
Thank You very much!
Выглядит потрясающе!
Ага. Только вес такой что никуда не годится. Или если не вес, то броня картонная.
Спасибо!
its quality but like the Panther the frontal armour its angled right to a flat plate which means a shell could bounce right into the center of the vehicle that and HEAT-FS would have huge fun with this
looks like something straight out of command and conquer
Imagine a mine hiting it hahaha
So what 🙄
Concept is right , someone is dreaming .
Excellent
Thank You Very Much!
Exelente idea, saludos desde Chile.
Muchas gracias, saludos desde Georgia.
Que lugar más exótico, lo relaciono con la ruta de La seda.
performance looks good,but what about building efficiency and cost?
Impressive.
Thank You Very Much!
The ammo for the 12,7mm is kinda exposed but its still easy to shoot it off
legit looks like something out of command and conquer
I wonder where you are going to put all the actuators and hydraulics that are required to power the systems shown and I don't even mention the space necessary for the engine, space for the fuel/fuel cells required.
Last but nıt least, ammunition?
Edit: I wrote this comment mid-way into the video and didn't even see the wheels...
Wheels for a crawler machine. I believe there will be propellers on Version 2.
Nice animation, cheers.
Looking forward to use it.... In call of duty😁😁
nice
Superb
Thank You!
Батарейка займет все внутренние пространство ,, чтобы столько двигателей кормить
In my opinion, armoured vehicles will become more and more automated or remotely operated. Compact, faster, highly maneuverable and flexible tactical vehicles, capable of fast, coordinated, precise and decisive attacks, will probably be the most efficient and rational way to go.
nice model design
👌👌
which software u used to animate it?
Thank You! 3dDs Max.
Awesome Mini tank...its machine to bring peace not a war ..
the peek a boo tank
I liked very much
Yeah good luck with that! :)
Thanks! :)
It would work... Only in video games
Mass production of much, much cheaper ATVs, SxS width, with machine gun mounts and 2 out of 10 with 4 Javelin mounts, obstacle avoidance, waypoint destination progammable, artificial intelligence, motion and infared detection and fire at will ability used enmass of 100 to 300 at a time, on suicide missions, at night, to punch a hole in an enemy line and, if any are left, to proceed deep into the rear sowing panic, all without a single soldiers life at risk is, I think, a very good idea that could be a game changer. Should be able to travel 100 miles on a tank of a gas/hybrid engine with all having waypoints ( many with different routes of getting to the waypoints) put in at the 100 mile mark, so that, in case some make it through, the most efficient use will be made out of them as they continue deeper behind enemy lines killing as they go.
i mean its a good tank or APC concept but in reality those tracks would be the main target by infantry and the main components are too exposed to the outside environment and mostly its way too complex like imagine trying to repair that thing.
Looks really good, but there is a reason vehicles with threads in tandem aren't used... I don't remember that reason, though...
how do you power it?
how fast is it
how important is it
For the sake of the future, I think we should create too many tanks like this
Valla pes ağzım açık kaldı. Bunu kim tasarladı ise helal olsun.
Thank You very much!
Maravilloso
Gracias!
Смешно. Не знаю, зачем я это смотрю в 21 году. Наверное, чисто поржать.
А я, посмотрев это чудо, понял, что Дахир (канал Dahir Insaat, наверно справа среди ссылок есть) не такие уж плохие идеи предлагает
I mean they could have just taped a gun onto a roomba but they just have to show off don't they.
So many moving parts so many points if potential failure.
I don't know it's purpose, and I know less of how the materials hold up or how much engine you can fit into that little thing alongside ammo for two machine guns. But what I can give you an opinion on is that one or two well placed large caliber shots can mess up those fancy hydraulic piston cabin real quick. Even if I'm wrong, this can fail in more places. Stop trying to do everything at once and have multiple variants for different purposes in a squad. You know, like humans do.
How can that thing be stable?
Also Because of complexity it would probably break a lot and be hard to repair.
how much it costs ?
the music was from a scifi space game
Titanfall is the best example of the future warfare
Looks like a fancy coffin to me.
There’s no substantial armor
The tracks don’t look like that can go over anything that isn’t paved
If it’s electric the battery getting it will be game over
You need a PhD to pilot the damn thing
There’s nowhere to store ammo or reload it easily
Looks cramped as hell
An IED Hell even a toe popper would blow the crap out of it
And finally I can’t see a single job that will do well, not anti-aircraft not antitank not anti-personnel unless they’re in a middle of a field you can’t clear building with it and I bet the moment it hits mud or sand it will cease to function.
Size of the battery to move that?
Trust me, it's not "future" at all. It would be hopelessly impractical and expensive if full-sized and fully equipped.
Looks like it's for anti - Air perposes.
Including! :)
I have some great concerns regarding the name of a potential death machine, the way YT algorithm works and the part of the world where I live
Edit: watched other vids on this channel. Oh yeah, i'ts all coming together
Please clarify, what you are worried about?
Needs ekectrified razor wire protection.
С ним даже воевать не придётся сам по дороге развалится.
Это концепт. Концепты не разваливаются... :)
@@industrialdesign2969 На данный момент времени, слишком технически сложный и ещё долго будет проигрывать узкоспециализированным видам техники. По сути это вариант экзоскелета.
MASHAALLAH khub valo
this is a really good concept
looks cool, but too many moving parts equals to many posible failures in combat, i also would take out the pilot and use a remote control, you have already hunter killer plataforms with atgm and cannons in smaller version
nice💪💪💪👍👍👍👍👍🔥🔥🔥🔥🔥
Thank You Very Much!
jack of all trade = master of none
quando a munição acabar vira um alvo muito facil.
Yoga Tank..
"The Rook, an armored critical incident vehicle 2013" UA-cam LOOK!!
This is REAL.
... The fact that I actually have a fictional tank design (VERY science fictional, as in utilizing many small-ish RTGs for engine power (each wheel of the track is powered by an encased pair of them to accommodate for the expected low output) and plasma-based weaponry (takes up the entirety of the turret to supply two cannons) that's ALSO called "The Rook" has me slightly uncomfortable...
@@i_am_jarvistm7220 How many kilometers is the equipment?
@@user-yz2yu5kr4v Do- ... Do you not know what RTGs are? Wait, right, I should probably assume not since- Right... RTGs (or Radioisotopic Thermoelectric Generators) are not necessarily limited by distance, but by lifetime, because they're essentially a PASSIVE variant to nuclear energy compared to the ACTIVE reactors you may well be aware of. They're also safer and MUCH more compact as well, you could practically make them whatever size you want, hypothetically, or at least to my knowledge. Anyways, the lifespan and shielding required in the encasing depends on the fuel source. With the source I looked up when researching this providing examples, the most ideal one that stood out to me was Plutonium (low shield + 88-year half life), though there are safer options as well as MUCH more powerful ones (though these would require a lot more shielding), but essentially this is the safest "middle ground." I'm not familiar with their usage in real life, but the concept certainly seems viable in this case.
2:35 peek-a-boo! *explosion*
Looks kinda overcomplicated - too many systems may go wrong, also kinda difficult to reliably motorize that many moving parts
Гладко было на бумаге ))))