SpaceX’s Explosive Engine Problem

Поділитися
Вставка
  • Опубліковано 23 лис 2021
  • Join me as I explain SpaceX's explosive engine problem, and then join 8 million other learners by giving Brilliant a try today at brilliant.org/primalspace
    With Starship almost ready to do its first ever orbital test flight, it will rely on help from the raptor vacuum engine. But testing vacuum engines is a little bit more difficult than you’d think. This video looks at how these engines were tested in the past and how SpaceX has managed to get around the main problem.
    Please Note: The Primal Space poster sale has now ended. Thanks for all of your support.
    Thanks to these awesome channels for their footage:
    Hazegrayart / hazegrayart
    C-Bass Productions / cbassproductions
    Starship Gazer / tampafloridabeachbum
    Spaceport3d / spaceport3d
    References:
    primalnebula.com/spacexs-expl...
    Thanks for watching this Primal Space video. If you enjoyed it, let me know in the comments below and don't forget to subscribe so you can see more videos like this!
    Support Primal Space by becoming a Patron!
    / primalspace
    Twitter: / theprimalspace
    Music used in this video:
    » Infinite Perspective - Kevin MacLeod
    » Oceans - Bobby Renz
    » The Plan’s Working - Cooper Cannell
    » Long Road Ahead - Kevin MacLeod
    Credits:
    Written and edited by Ewan Cunningham ( / ewan_cee )
    Narrated by: Beau Stucki
    #spacex #starship #raptorengine
  • Наука та технологія

КОМЕНТАРІ • 272

  • @adamanderson3042
    @adamanderson3042 2 роки тому +301

    Non-vacuum optimised engines don't 'become less efficient' the higher altitude they get, they actually get more efficient, it's just that vacuum optimised engines become disproportionately more efficient.

    • @dsdy1205
      @dsdy1205 2 роки тому +18

      @@alexv3357 What he means is that an SL optimised engine will always be less efficient than the same engine vac-optimised at the same altitude. However, if you take a single engine, SL or vac optimised, and chart its Isp as it ascends through the atmosphere, its Isp will always increase. A SL engine, like a vac engine, also has better Isp in vacuum due to the drop in pressure, it's just not as pronounced as it would be with a vac engine

    • @lazarus2691
      @lazarus2691 2 роки тому +27

      @@alexv3357 No, Adam is correct. Although a sea level engine is optimally expanded at sea level, it still gains efficiency as it becomes over-expanded.
      This is because the reduction in pressure slowing the exhaust increases efficiency more than enough to offset the losses from the less optimal expansion.
      A vacuum engine gets the increase from pressure reduction *without* the losses from less optimal expansion, hence getting a bigger increase.
      Raptor sea level goes from 330s at sea level to 350s in vacuum, which is still an increase, but not as much as the Raptor vacuum which gets 380s in vacuum.

    • @andrewcarr3650
      @andrewcarr3650 2 роки тому +4

      @@lazarus2691 Exactly so :)

    • @xxdAnxxwILliAmSxx
      @xxdAnxxwILliAmSxx 2 роки тому +3

      @@alexv3357 actually the first comment is right, specific impulse increases with altitude pretty much regardless of nozzle design all the way to vaccum. It's just at the vac engines maximum Isp is at a higher altitude.

    • @kerbalengineer1243
      @kerbalengineer1243 2 роки тому +1

      @@alexv3357 sea level engines still have more ISP at vacuum

  • @reagank.2268
    @reagank.2268 2 роки тому +128

    There’s also a ring they put around the edge of the nozzle for static fire tests that is removed before flights. You can actually see it in the video you showed

    • @PresidentialWinner
      @PresidentialWinner 2 роки тому

      timestamp ? big thanks

    • @reagank.2268
      @reagank.2268 2 роки тому +10

      @@PresidentialWinner 1:13 look at the edge of the nozzle. You can see a ring going around the edge. Someone got a closeup of one of those rings in boca chica and they say “STATIC FIRE RING. REMOVE BEFORE FLIGHT” on the side of them.

    • @reagank.2268
      @reagank.2268 2 роки тому

      @@MapedMod that’s cool. How do you know that? Do you work for spaceX?

    • @reagank.2268
      @reagank.2268 2 роки тому +1

      @@MapedMod but how do you know the ring isn’t there for reinforcement? It could be that

    • @reagank.2268
      @reagank.2268 2 роки тому +1

      @@MapedMod this engine operates in the vacuum where no such air is present.

  • @Moxzot
    @Moxzot 2 роки тому +37

    The spaceshuttles nozzle also curls inward slightly to reduce the likelihood that the flow separates.

  • @jackbruh3397
    @jackbruh3397 2 роки тому +60

    My Man is finally back

    • @eoinconnellan880
      @eoinconnellan880 2 роки тому

      Ye he only uploads like every 3 or 4 weeks

    • @glarbstentemford5334
      @glarbstentemford5334 2 роки тому +1

      haha the quality of his content is so good but he only uploads 4 to 5 weeks 😬

  • @vicentecrestani5812
    @vicentecrestani5812 2 роки тому +36

    1:01 Saturn V isn't the most powerful rocket ever made, this goes to N1
    It(the Saturn V) is the most powerful rocket ever successfully flown.

    • @glenkeating7333
      @glenkeating7333 2 роки тому +3

      Actually, the N1 didn't get very high off the launch pad. It exploded a few minutes into its flight.

    • @vicentecrestani5812
      @vicentecrestani5812 2 роки тому +11

      @@glenkeating7333 that was my point. It wasn't successfully flown. However the first stage of the N1 still is the most powerful rocket ever yeeted of the launch pad. Period.
      You can look it up.

    • @Loading-lg6hs
      @Loading-lg6hs 2 роки тому

      thx for clarification lol

    • @glenkeating7333
      @glenkeating7333 2 роки тому +1

      @@vicentecrestani5812 . Oh, I agree with you.👍

    • @glenkeating7333
      @glenkeating7333 2 роки тому +3

      @SFS Cheetah . The SLS has never flown.

  • @markmarsh27
    @markmarsh27 2 роки тому

    Your videos are better than any TV documentary ever made. .. LOVE your work. ... Thank you.

  • @SpaceflightRocketShorts
    @SpaceflightRocketShorts 2 роки тому +24

    Dude, I absolutely LOVE these videos! Thank you so much!!!

  • @therocketman7751
    @therocketman7751 2 роки тому +2

    Love your videos and the animation style keep up the hard work!

  • @wildpotato8018
    @wildpotato8018 2 роки тому +5

    This man's transitions to advertisements is too clean

    • @user-tc2tx6my3c
      @user-tc2tx6my3c 2 роки тому +1

      Polymatter is smoother with ad transitions tho

  • @LZentertainments
    @LZentertainments 2 роки тому +3

    Thank you for making these videos. You're a big part of keeping my interest in space. So glad I found your channel at 10k subs.

    • @jessefurlan5585
      @jessefurlan5585 2 роки тому +1

      Did anyone else try to flick the bug in LZ's user image

    • @willdmann363
      @willdmann363 2 роки тому

      @@jessefurlan5585 Yeah, I've had some small flies around for a while so I was like, Ugh, not again

  • @Live.Vibe.Lasers
    @Live.Vibe.Lasers 2 роки тому +19

    i'm more interested in the steam ejector system that can remove the exhaust from tons of liquid combusting every second from a fairly small pressure vessel.

    • @Loading-lg6hs
      @Loading-lg6hs 2 роки тому +2

      true

    • @ricomotions5416
      @ricomotions5416 2 роки тому +2

      yeah how the fuck

    • @jakob9911
      @jakob9911 2 роки тому

      I dont think they can do it with engines That use tons of fuel every secund. Properly only smaller engines.

    • @jakob9911
      @jakob9911 2 роки тому

      Raptor only uses 650kg/s and That is a bery big engine for vacume.

  • @clavo3352
    @clavo3352 2 роки тому

    Great video with fantastic helpful explanatory graphics!

  • @pinochet3317
    @pinochet3317 2 роки тому +89

    The only problem with Raptor imo is that it doesn’t have the “honk” on shutdown anymore

    • @chronovore7234
      @chronovore7234 2 роки тому +16

      I miss the sound of those valves closing, it used to sound like a monster from Godzilla.

    • @Loading-lg6hs
      @Loading-lg6hs 2 роки тому +3

      rlly? that's what used to bother me lol

    • @pinochet3317
      @pinochet3317 2 роки тому +4

      @@Loading-lg6hs at first it didn’t sound like a healthy noise it should make, but as time went on it grew on me haha

    • @lucasrem1870
      @lucasrem1870 2 роки тому +1

      Pinochet
      need posters? why you cry here?
      why this mad community? what you need here?????

  • @Qwarzz
    @Qwarzz 2 роки тому +49

    Saturn V isn't the most powerful rocket ever made. It is the most powerful rocket to reach orbit so far however.

    • @Ignacio.Romero
      @Ignacio.Romero 2 роки тому +19

      The Saturn V is most powerful rocket ever made to not explode within the first minute after launch, or as some may say, the most powerful rocket ever made

    • @AlexandreJWKlaus
      @AlexandreJWKlaus 2 роки тому +13

      @@Ignacio.Romero made: something that has fully been produced. Even if something is bad or does not work, if made it is made.
      Best description of Saturn V is the most powerful rocket to achieve it’s mission

    • @Ignacio.Romero
      @Ignacio.Romero 2 роки тому +2

      @@AlexandreJWKlaus Please, you can't that say something that wasn't designed to blow up, but made the biggest non-nuclear explosion on Earth anyway was "fully made". Stop with the nonsensical technicalities.
      The N1 can get the title of being the most powerful rocket ever designed and tested tho

    • @AlexandreJWKlaus
      @AlexandreJWKlaus 2 роки тому +2

      @@Ignacio.Romero yes, what I am pointing out is the Saturn V is the most powerful rocket that accomplished it's mission (rephrasing of what I said before).

    • @bobjoatmon1993
      @bobjoatmon1993 2 роки тому +6

      This is the type of guy that if someone said "the sun rises in the East" would contradict that and say that only applies if your exactly on the equator... If your not on the equator then your off east by degrees of latitude.
      A quibbler.

  • @bdjm8595
    @bdjm8595 2 роки тому

    Excellent explanation of the challenges involved !!!!

  • @vipondiu
    @vipondiu 2 роки тому +12

    So what is the "SpaceX's Raptor Testing Problem" if it can be tested at sea level without any problem?

    • @reagank.2268
      @reagank.2268 2 роки тому +25

      Clickbait, that’s the problem.

    • @anthonyasp1295
      @anthonyasp1295 2 роки тому

      @@reagank.2268 tldr, they take off the nozzle. that's not problem at all.

    • @reagank.2268
      @reagank.2268 2 роки тому +4

      @@anthonyasp1295 they take the nozzle off for Merlin, not Raptor

    • @SiggyPony
      @SiggyPony 2 роки тому +3

      agreed. An entire video about a problem that elon stated wasn't a problem in a single tweet :/

  • @MitchCyan
    @MitchCyan 2 роки тому +4

    I think I’m gunna be able to hear the starship launch from the UK.

  • @PresidentialWinner
    @PresidentialWinner 2 роки тому +10

    I read the title and was worried, after watching the video i feel like this problem Sounds like one of those good problems, one that is pretty much solved. In fact you even mentioned they have an advantage concerning this issue.

  • @eoinconnellan880
    @eoinconnellan880 2 роки тому

    Love your videos keep it up

  • @hi6go7
    @hi6go7 2 роки тому +11

    There's a bit of a mistake at 2:22 where you say, "if the pressure is higher than the ambient temperature". I'm sure it was just a slip of the tongue

  • @Djzaamir
    @Djzaamir 2 роки тому

    Excellent video.

  • @keithmcknight7646
    @keithmcknight7646 2 роки тому

    Great video 👍🏽

  • @Kneichion
    @Kneichion 2 роки тому +1

    This was so good, were is part 2 :)

  • @mommyqayko5440
    @mommyqayko5440 2 роки тому +5

    Primal Space, the Saturn V wasn't the most powerful rocket ever, that goes to the N1 currently.

    • @kebha6308
      @kebha6308 2 роки тому +1

      The N1 wasn't ever successfully launched. That's like saying the Starship is currently the most powerful rocket in existence...it's not; the Falcon Heavy is until Starship flies.

    • @mommyqayko5440
      @mommyqayko5440 2 роки тому

      @@kebha6308 It wasn't successfully launched but it launched 4 times which made it the most powerful rocket ever launched.

    • @OGPatriot03
      @OGPatriot03 2 роки тому

      @@kebha6308 It was successfully launched, it just didn't complete it's mission. If you light the engines and it leaves the launch pad that's a successful "launch".

  • @terrygelinas4593
    @terrygelinas4593 2 роки тому +6

    I guess SpaceX couldn't (or didn't feel it was necessary) to launch a single 2nd-stage Raptor vacuum engine, mounted on a regular Falcon 9 first-stage booster? If it were possible, then you can directly test the single Raptor engine in the true vacuum of space, thus cheaply re-using a first-stage booster to get the Raptor engine into space. Hopefully the strong Raptor bell nozzle will continue to hold up during further testing.

    • @user2C47
      @user2C47 2 роки тому +1

      Putting RVac on a Falcon 2nd stage would require a complete reconfiguration of the fuel tanks, and the thrust would likely be too much. Also, Falcon's stage 0 does not support cryogenic fuel. (Only the oxidizer is cryogenic)
      Simply put, the cost would be far greater than the benefit.

  • @twofacedmctwoface4876
    @twofacedmctwoface4876 2 роки тому

    Brilliant ly created video...

  • @joshuamena4873
    @joshuamena4873 2 роки тому +1

    New video!! I like that

  • @noe616
    @noe616 2 роки тому +2

    Instead of launching a car to space, they should have sent a vacuum raptor test vehicle.

  • @kellywu4061
    @kellywu4061 2 роки тому +1

    Just because the Raptor has a higher chamber pressure doesn’t mean its exhaust pressure is higher than sea level ambient. The job of the vacuum nozzle is to reduce exhaust pressure as low as possible, regardless of how high the chamber pressure is.

    • @gold5556
      @gold5556 Рік тому +1

      Yeah this video doesn't make any sense

  • @erideimos1207
    @erideimos1207 2 роки тому +5

    Yes Elon tweeted that thrust was high enough to prevent flow separation for Rvacs at SL.

    • @Loading-lg6hs
      @Loading-lg6hs 2 роки тому +1

      ahh... so that's what he meant by "flow separation"

  • @Ernestlyspeaking383
    @Ernestlyspeaking383 2 роки тому +1

    Love primal space

  • @slimj091
    @slimj091 2 роки тому

    Title sound like "SpaceX has a major problem! oh no!"
    The video is like "Nah it's all good homie".

  • @haydenbrophy9460
    @haydenbrophy9460 2 роки тому

    Just bought a poster :)

  • @mrdzentelman3694
    @mrdzentelman3694 2 роки тому

    nice vid

  • @SapientPearwood
    @SapientPearwood 2 роки тому +3

    The explanation at the end that Raptor has a higher chamber pressure enabling Vacuum Raptor sea level tests without over-expansion issues doesn't make much sense. If the nozzle is designed to be properly expanded in vacuum, then it is by definition over-expanded at sea level, that is completely independent of the chamber pressure. Ultimately at the nozzle exit plane in a sea level scenario for any vacuum optimized nozzle, there is exactly 1 atmosphere of difference in pressure between the nozzle's optimal design exit ambient pressure and the actual exit ambient pressure. For any given chamber pressure, a vacuum optimized nozzle should be designed to get the exhaust as close to 0 kPa at the exit plane as practical, which just means more expansion for engines with higher chamber pressures.
    I get that this was Elon's response to a tweet, but that response doesn't make much physical sense. My guess is that the explanation of higher chamber pressure isn't meant as a direct explanation, but instead is alluding to a more indirect effect. For example, maybe because the chamber pressure is higher, you can get still get a large pressure ratio between the throat and exit while still having a relatively higher outlet pressure. But that would still mean you are leaving performance on the table by not sufficiently expanding your vacuum optimized nozzle (essentially wasting some of the performance gains associated with designing to a higher chamber pressure). I think that is what was meant when he said the engine isn't fully vacuum optimized yet, which is the actual reason they don't have to worry, because they aren't dropping the exit pressure as low as they could be. Maybe that is made more tolerable by having a higher chamber pressure, but you are still needlessly leaving performance on the table, performance you worked hard to get by designing to such a high chamber pressure.

    • @runem5429
      @runem5429 2 роки тому

      Given the high chamber pressure and therefore extremly high expansion ratio need to get to the same near zero pressure, I think the vacuum raptor might not be as close to zero as other engines simply because it's limited by physical space to fit at the bottom of Starship. this would mean that it could be less susceptible to flow separation simply because the pressure on the inside wall near the exit is higher than on other vaccum engines.
      I this part of what you are saying? Or am I totally off?

  • @biggjimmy4414
    @biggjimmy4414 2 роки тому

    thanks

  • @XSI5
    @XSI5 2 роки тому

    We also see a bit of nozzle flex on every second stage engine start up on a Falcon 9

  • @dailybugles6765
    @dailybugles6765 2 роки тому

    Nice

  • @carlosalbertomartinsjunior2163
    @carlosalbertomartinsjunior2163 2 роки тому

    I love primal space.

  • @nightfox6738
    @nightfox6738 2 роки тому

    If they send an rvac up in a module on a falcon9 they could theoretically test it pretty well. Would be expensive though

  • @BosonCollider
    @BosonCollider 2 роки тому +1

    Hoo boy. Looks like your title selection was jinxed. Or maybe it jinxed spacex

  • @jenilthummar8255
    @jenilthummar8255 2 роки тому

    Primal Space mastered "Art of Thumbnail"

  • @MaximumBan
    @MaximumBan 2 роки тому +2

    I learned from this video more than a 6 years of KSP missions!

  • @squidwardfromua
    @squidwardfromua 2 роки тому

    0:51 N1: Hi 👋

  • @Fister_of_Muppets
    @Fister_of_Muppets 2 роки тому +2

    By the time Starship goes into standardized production, it won't be called Raptor anymore (Elon commented to thus already). The current Raptor has went through hundreds if not thousands of tweaks over the last few years. You never know, they might even figure out a sea-level/vacuum hybrid that eliminates the need for separate models.

    • @Loading-lg6hs
      @Loading-lg6hs 2 роки тому

      I think the new engine will be a loot further down the road than you think. i think they'll start mass production with Raptor, and then make the switch after. I could be completely wrong tho

  • @ronaldhanlon5516
    @ronaldhanlon5516 2 роки тому +1

    The shuttle engines turned out to be the most reliable in between engines ever built and every one of them has been used at least four times the true meaning of reusable

  • @danielnorman8595
    @danielnorman8595 2 роки тому

    Certainly seems like they could design and adjustable titanium sleeve that could slide down and expand as they got into higher altitudes.

    • @willdmann363
      @willdmann363 2 роки тому

      I believe that ULA did that with one of their engines on a Delta rocket or some other one.

  • @ahmedal-bassyouni74
    @ahmedal-bassyouni74 2 роки тому +1

    This video is really great, it should has more views!

  • @hugotoscher4734
    @hugotoscher4734 2 роки тому

    How mouch would cost shipping that poster to Slovak Republic?

  • @danieldc8841
    @danieldc8841 2 роки тому

    If you can just increase the chamber pressure to make the exhaust match atmospheric pressure, surely you could just use that capability in flight to get better exhaust velocity and higher ISP?

    • @quinnreierson
      @quinnreierson 2 роки тому

      What he said in the video is wrong; on horizontal test fires of raptor vac you can see the flow get pushed in by the atmosphere and form shock diamonds. It does not match atmospheric pressure

  • @teytreet7358
    @teytreet7358 2 роки тому

    Did the Saturn V have a RUD? Would be a good preview if the Starship blows up.

  • @maximilianamann4175
    @maximilianamann4175 2 роки тому +2

    This aged well.

  • @devanarayans5131
    @devanarayans5131 2 роки тому

    hey guys.. hope everyone is well

  • @hadleymanmusic
    @hadleymanmusic 2 роки тому +1

    Come on double saturn!!!!

  • @jacktheriprr1296
    @jacktheriprr1296 Рік тому

    what people see in the thumbnail : Raptor
    what I see : Raptop

  • @satterar
    @satterar 2 роки тому

    2:23 ambient pressure

  • @hsvr
    @hsvr 2 роки тому

    i guess they should have hired me if they wanted their problems solving quick

  • @VecheslavNovikov
    @VecheslavNovikov 2 роки тому +1

    RIP Boca Chica village and surrounding nature reserves.

    • @VecheslavNovikov
      @VecheslavNovikov 2 роки тому

      @Vesta 2022 Isn't it? The massive amount of power exiting the vehicle has to go somewhere. And if there's a failure on the launchpad, wouldn't it be a disaster of N1 proportions?

    • @VecheslavNovikov
      @VecheslavNovikov 2 роки тому

      @Vesta 2022 "just" the sound is minimising an enormously disruptive event.

  • @hugofavio
    @hugofavio 2 роки тому

    crei que habia visto el cohete , pero no aparece en las noticias entonces no se que vi . jaja

  • @cantstoptommy7077
    @cantstoptommy7077 2 роки тому

    2:20 “If the pressure is higher than the ambient temperature”
    huh?

  • @Marc83Aus
    @Marc83Aus 2 роки тому +1

    Biggest problem with Raptor is starship isnt allowed to fly yet...

  • @killernat1234
    @killernat1234 2 роки тому +1

    This is the same problem the USSR’s N1 had

  • @Helios-Rex
    @Helios-Rex 2 роки тому

    Didnt the N1 put off more thrust than the Saturn V?

    • @newhorizon3229
      @newhorizon3229 2 роки тому

      Yes it did, but it's max payload to leo was smaller.

  • @doomturtle9594
    @doomturtle9594 2 роки тому

    SpaceX is gonna do some building for a non/air pressure lock for the engines. No way will spaceX will ignore the engine problem, so it’s possible for the testing.

  • @goontheracoon
    @goontheracoon 2 роки тому

    main problem.. we still use round nozzles, think we have done most we can with this old rocket engine design- yeah, u can push it- but that just makes it even easyer to demage.

    • @user2C47
      @user2C47 2 роки тому

      Can you think of a better nozzle design for chemical engines?

    • @mathewcherrystone9479
      @mathewcherrystone9479 2 роки тому

      That's because "round" is the best shape. You have the least amount of area per volume and it is the strongest when it comes to stress. There is no need to go to any other shape.

    • @goontheracoon
      @goontheracoon 2 роки тому

      Ill give it away, the earospike gets me hard, and i think it still can be made lighter and faster..

    • @OGPatriot03
      @OGPatriot03 2 роки тому

      @@mathewcherrystone9479 Look up the Toroidal aerospike..

    • @mathewcherrystone9479
      @mathewcherrystone9479 2 роки тому

      @@OGPatriot03 well the nozzles on these are still round since only the lower bell part is replaced by the aerospike while the burn chamber is still that of an regular rocket engine.

  • @bryanguzik
    @bryanguzik 2 роки тому

    Q: Does "...run the engine at a much-higher chamber pressure" equate to saying they "overdo it" on the ground as an analog for the actual run? I re-watched it a couple times, and bluntly, I don't think I get it!

    • @Qwarzz
      @Qwarzz 2 роки тому +1

      I think Raptor just has much higher chamber pressure than engines normally do. I wonder if the vacuum engine could then be even more efficient with bigger bell but it's just not feasible to make it so big.

    • @kazedcat
      @kazedcat 2 роки тому

      Qwarzz Yes they can expand the nozzle of the raptor vacuum but they have no space for it in the starship. Also the nozzle have regenerative cooling and making it bigger becomes a problem since you now have to cool a much larger surface area.

  • @stephengordon4081
    @stephengordon4081 2 роки тому

    Think about the explosion when super heavy has a launch accident.

  • @Hygix_
    @Hygix_ 2 роки тому

    Sigma company rule 101: don't say you are promoting yourself, say that you are sponsoring yourself

  • @BrandonKent136
    @BrandonKent136 2 роки тому

    The vacuum engine still experiences overexpansion at sea level

  • @lynxoflight72
    @lynxoflight72 2 роки тому

    Just a short fact check. the soviet N-1 rocket was the most powerful rocket ever built. also a 1960's moon rocket but wrong side of the pacific

  • @Checkam_yt
    @Checkam_yt Рік тому

    I visited the spaceX launch site

  • @JonnyPowell
    @JonnyPowell 2 роки тому

    la beast music ftw

  • @mikeoxmall69420
    @mikeoxmall69420 Рік тому

    It went boom lol

    • @primalspace
      @primalspace  Рік тому

      yeeeeaaaaah I guess we'll have to wait and see what happens next now

  • @gabes3dvideos
    @gabes3dvideos Рік тому +1

    33 points of failure and a bad design. Smart!

    • @trickeruniverse1979
      @trickeruniverse1979 8 місяців тому

      By that logic, the 27 engines on falcon heavy are all points of failures ?
      And in what way is starship a bad design?, also tell what you’d consider a “good design” for a 5000 Ton fully reusable rocket.

  • @otrag_1116
    @otrag_1116 2 роки тому +1

    this aged well

  • @racistman928
    @racistman928 Рік тому

    Booster 7 just blew up

  • @geryz7549
    @geryz7549 2 роки тому

    0:52 ever successfully flown* , not made
    The N1 actually had more thrust on its first stage

  • @SiggyPony
    @SiggyPony 2 роки тому +1

    So basically with Raptor there is no Explosive Engine problem :/ just like Elon said in a single tweet.

  • @StarshipFairing
    @StarshipFairing 2 роки тому +1

    Fun fact: the Raptor Vacuum is a pretty good sustainer engine, just like the RS25 and Vulcain engine. Might be a good contender for the main engine for the Vulcan rocket…

  • @JunaidRiazAlHassan
    @JunaidRiazAlHassan 2 роки тому

    Don’t aim for success if you want it; just do what you love and believe in absolutely, and it will come naturally.
    🌹Good Morning🌹
    *यदि आप सफलता चाहते हैं तो केवल बिना लक्ष्य के वही कीजिए जो आपको अच्छा लगता है और जिसमें आपको पूर्ण विश्वास है, सफलता आपको खुद-बखुद मिल जायेगी ।*
    🌹 सुप्रभात🌹o

  • @perfumedmanatee6235
    @perfumedmanatee6235 2 роки тому

    Temperature and pressure.

  • @thePronto
    @thePronto 2 роки тому

    So the point is not that the vacuum engines explode, it's just that they have not been tested in a vacuum?

  • @righteousred723
    @righteousred723 2 роки тому

    Why are they worried about air getting into the exhaust funnel in space

  • @Poatatero
    @Poatatero 2 роки тому

    That sponsor segway

  • @runem5429
    @runem5429 2 роки тому

    Saturn 5 is *not* the most powerful rocket ever made as described in the context to liftoff thrust.
    It's the most powerful US rocket so far in terms of thrust at lift-off.
    It's the most powerful rocket overall in terms of payload to LEO.
    But Saturn 5 had less trust and gross mass at liftoff than both N1 and Energia, if I remember and Wikipeia correctly.

    • @mathewcherrystone9479
      @mathewcherrystone9479 2 роки тому +1

      The Energia had less thrust than rhe Saturn V, but otherwise correct.

    • @runem5429
      @runem5429 2 роки тому

      @@mathewcherrystone9479 You are correct, according to Wikipedia, now that I do better math in my head, it is actually about 1% less. I stand corrected :)

  • @rahulbanerjee6635
    @rahulbanerjee6635 2 роки тому +1

    But nucler rocket more powerful. Then chemical engine.

    • @General12th
      @General12th 2 роки тому

      It's not. The power output of a nuclear thermal engine is lower than the power output of most chemical engines.

  • @CHMichael
    @CHMichael 2 роки тому

    That's why we need a facility on the moon . Or while we test them on the iss - pusch it to the moon . ( joke , little)

  • @OHHfuckit
    @OHHfuckit 2 роки тому

    "loose efficiency no matter how they're shaped".... Aerospike?

  • @grahamstevenson1740
    @grahamstevenson1740 2 роки тому

    The brightest minds on the planet ? SpaceX just fired loads of their top guys for pure incompetence. Brightest minds INDEED !

  • @dsdy1205
    @dsdy1205 2 роки тому

    So apparently the head of Raptor development was recently let go

    • @gasdive
      @gasdive 2 роки тому

      Retired after several decades. Founding employee of SpaceX, already successful engine designer.
      After designing the Merlin, Kestrel, Draco and Superdraco engines (with over 1000 successful mission firings), he designed the Raptor 1, Raptor 2 and Raptor Vacuum engines. No one works forever. Hardly "let go".

    • @dsdy1205
      @dsdy1205 2 роки тому

      @@gasdive I'm not talking about Tom Mueller though.

    • @gasdive
      @gasdive 2 роки тому

      @@dsdy1205 oh, my mistake.

  • @shanbadg697
    @shanbadg697 2 роки тому

    Please, tell me they are working on 1 or 2 more starships, if this fails. I’m not getting any younger.

  • @harryvlogs7833
    @harryvlogs7833 2 роки тому

    Actually all rocket engines have better efficiency at high altitude even sea level ones

  • @Nimbus12
    @Nimbus12 2 роки тому

    Sooooooooo, what's the explosive engine problem?

  • @sleysyknockoutcity7175
    @sleysyknockoutcity7175 2 роки тому

    Hi

  • @ReetoPlayz
    @ReetoPlayz Рік тому +2

    4:13 OHIO💀

  • @grahamstevenson1740
    @grahamstevenson1740 2 роки тому

    Sorry, but nobody's going to be colonising mars for so many reasons you've entirely ignored.

  • @tonk3841
    @tonk3841 Рік тому +1

    4:14 "at a nasa facility in ohio"
    only in ohio fr fr no cap

  • @electronicspitara178
    @electronicspitara178 2 роки тому

    Second

  • @UltimateButtermachine
    @UltimateButtermachine Рік тому +2

    well it exploded