Why is war in itself not illegal ? That would be way faster to ban this practice than to give it rules no? These rules feel very hypocrite like why are you even considering authorizing wars
How so? It covers the main concept of weighing the military advantages foreseen to be obtained by the attack (military necessity), over the loss and damage of civilian life or property. What in your opinion do you think should have been explained more?
In reality, Wars break all rules not mentioning such principles of Human rights which seem to be so vulnerable, technical-oriented, and so non-authoritative.
From my observations, only the Americans and most NATO countries have honored IHL. Therefore, it is a sick joke. Proportionality is illogical and, in essence, means that wars will go on forever. That is exactly what we are seeing in Ukraine, Gaza, Syria, and Lebanon. It is what we saw in Iraq and Afghanistan. Tit for tat is a strategy for sustained suffering and chaos.
Great video to show in class.
This needs more visibility
Please refer to specific articles on GC AND AP so that we understand better
i wish all powerful countries would have respected all GC and IHL protocols
Thanks a lot
Do they still apply at the END OF USUFRUCT??? I would really appreciate an answer.
USA: "I feel that this video is attacking us and our culture"
Parties of International Armed Conflict and Non-International Armed Conflict and the UN are taking new strategies in armed conflict.
ELIMINATE THE U.N
Why is war in itself not illegal ? That would be way faster to ban this practice than to give it rules no? These rules feel very hypocrite like why are you even considering authorizing wars
It is though, UN Charter, Article 2, Par. 4.
if someone has a gun you cant just tell him to stop can you
Good
distinction 区別 00:32
proportionality 比例、均衡 01:08
precaution 予防 01:40
❤❤❤❤❤❤
i think we need a russian version. they didnt get this right :)
How to bypass: Win the war and blame your enemy so they get the blame instead
Proportionality is not correctly explained
How so? It covers the main concept of weighing the military advantages foreseen to be obtained by the attack (military necessity), over the loss and damage of civilian life or property. What in your opinion do you think should have been explained more?
602 Barton Extension
I think those principles are effective on the weak nations
In reality, Wars break all rules not mentioning such principles of Human rights which seem to be so vulnerable, technical-oriented, and so non-authoritative.
McClure Radial
398 Goodwin Crossroad
5591 Sanford Inlet
919 Ondricka Fords
Reinger Stravenue
31256 Strosin Forks
Wilkinson Drive
Carroll Manors
Please I want to identify with an IHL club
7.5 earthquake in Peru one day ago, G d bless. Katrina Marcia Villanueva BIODIESEL
Lysanne Garden
Swift Brook
34218 Tillman Shores
Ed Forest
From my observations, only the Americans and most NATO countries have honored IHL. Therefore, it is a sick joke. Proportionality is illogical and, in essence, means that wars will go on forever. That is exactly what we are seeing in Ukraine, Gaza, Syria, and Lebanon. It is what we saw in Iraq and Afghanistan. Tit for tat is a strategy for sustained suffering and chaos.
Price Corner
Baumbach Valleys
Koch Shoals
No one can enforce these rules, look at Russia and Hamas
Most significantly, look at Israel.
I still cannot comprehend how people who have watched video on IHL still forget not mention Israel. Just hilarious.
I am now having degree of Certificate in International Humanitarian Law. 🤝🙏🤍🕊🏳☮️Ⓜ️
9973 Bridgette Trail
Pfannerstill Streets
Renner Coves
Michelle Row
960 Aufderhar Land
Well, russia doesn't follow the rules!
Latino's are not Greeks nor
Ridiculous
35112 Zieme Port
58337 Camron Inlet