@@wednesdeityevery company does. They’re good if you don’t use extensions or anything like that and just need a convenient browser but it’s not that great to run and customize outside of looks that I’ve seen in reviews. I don’t like it but I’m just so used to chrome and all it’s abilities
Exactly! It's sheer laziness to just allow whoTFever to claim a video and immediately start taking their revenue, without question or proof. I get that there's a law, but YT is enacting this in the most hands-off way possible and it only ever hurts innocent content creators.
Yeah I agree. UA-cam needs to take some of the blame for this. It keeps happening under their watch and they are not doing anything about.. ya know why? It's probably because they are gonna have to hire actual people to work in the copyright department which means less revenue for investors. So they rely on algorithms cuz it's cheap. Obviously.
If we don’t hear from you we know what happened youtube ceo really need to re evaluate there stance on things like this Protecting scammers with lazy systems
It always becomes an unusually sad and heavy court case when the victims are somehow complicit in facilitating their own theft. You can not get away with doing nothing to stop the thieves when they are not even armed to hurt you!
this is america its really fucking sad isn't it weed is harmless, yet lives are literally being ended because of it (prison) while stealing literally millions of dollars is just a 5 year sentence very fair indeed
The people commenting on this are clowns, the majority of people were defending Gary Bowser when he did the same thing, now everyone is celebrating this Charlie included? Charlie and his fan base are absolute trash hypocrites.
I still do not encourage or endorse committing any sort of grand larceny or theft on the internet just because you know there is a light sentence for stealing music money from other users. 5 years and 10 months in prison will feel even longer when you actually experience that prison time for yourself. I wish I knew enough about UA-cam to know how false copyright strikes will eventually harm the bottom line of the higher-ups, and not just the bottom line of individual users.
Same the only thing is the restitution if they make him pay a certain amount and that's the only thing that could suck cuz if u don't pay u go to jail again and again like child support but out of 23 million I know he still has alot somewhere and they probably only charged him less than 3 or 4 million restitution when he gets out unless he made a deal and gave them a couple million when he got prosecuted
The people commenting on this are clowns, the majority of people were defending Gary Bowser when he did the same thing, now everyone is celebrating this Charlie included? Charlie and his fan base are absolute trash hypocrites.
5 years means he's serving a day for each 12600 dollars that he's stolen. When's the last time you stole twelve thousand dollars and got a day of punishment for it?
Unbelievable for us poors, right? But laws are designed to be slipped by the wealthy. Hell, remember that story about how Elon stole emeralds worth tens of thousands from his dad as a kid? Just normal things for these kinds of people - it’s like stealing a toothbrush to them.
Bro, I'm WILLINGLY going that 70 months if it means I walk away with 23 million clams. That is an EASY price to pay. I'm about to know every inmate by name and have secret handshakes with like a third of em.
This really high-lights how batshit inane UA-cams approach to copyright is. “Hey that’s mine” seems to be all it takes. Their only concern seems to be removing themselves from any liability at the expense of their own content creators.
The law should consider crimes like these as Grand Larceny. It is the same thing as stealing 23 million dollars from a bank. Give him a life sentence please
Wow. That is very sad and pathetic how UA-cam's community guidelines and rules against false copyright claims and false copyright strikes, do not value the security of their users like a real bank. They do not take cheaters of the copyright system seriously enough to de-incentivize these offenses from happening again simply because they think they are big enough to recover from this. UA-cam wrongfully assumes that no grand larceny will be grand enough to shut them down forever, not even shut them down for a short week.
Also, if you contest the copyright claim, the "company" who claimed it gets to decide whether or not it was a false claim, which they never do of course. Can't believe youtube still doesn't recognize this as a major oversight in their platform.
It’s insane. We had an old song get claimed by someone because 2 seconds of it sounded like a couple notes from their own song _that was uploaded several years after ours_ 😂 Fortunately it was one we hadn’t cared about for years & it’s not like we ever got big views, so it didn’t matter much. We did try to contest it at the time for the hell of it though, and exactly what you said happens...is what happened. “Oh well whatever” & all, but when it happens to a relatively popular artist/band/creator I can only imagine how frustrating it is
Between the copyright claim scammers, the copyright claim abuses by legit publishers, and the outright wrong copyright claims being asserted by UA-cam, I hope that there is eventually a class action lawsuit against UA-cam for their accommodation and facilitation of all of it. In an age where AI can identify and discern and analyze and report, it is ridiculous how all of these scams and abuses are possible at all, which has gotta make you wonder how much YT profits from allowing it all.
@@EfIsForFoxtrot yeah literally any idiot reporting you, or if you write *swear word* YOU, or YOU *swear word* it will auto delete comment if you post and then likely give a 24 hour mute, it's fucking pathetic and if you just swear too much in general. i swear alot and it's CONSTANTLY giving me the "R U SURE U WANNA POST THIS ITS SOOOO MEAN!!!!!!:(" bullshit popups, where if you click anyways it INSTA auto deletes/doesn't even post, and after a few times in a single day it triggers a mute... it's a joke now
UA-cam is the primary profiteer as they get a percentage regardless of who wins the claim. This is clear selective enforcement. If the DA hasnt prosecuted anyone else (namely youtube), they are selectively choosing who and when to prosecute which is unenforceable. This guy needs to appeal. The entire judicial system is illegitimate.
One of the things I find to be super irritating is when you pay to license sound packs in perpetuity and mix some audio for a video from it, and then some a**hole copyrights your video because they licensed the same audio pack and used it for some song they made. It’s just so irritating that UA-cam allows this to happen. I’m glad this guy got fried for it, but it need to happen more. There’s a ton of this bullsh!t going around. It’s infuriating.
Imagine working your whole life on your craft to finally be able to share it on the internet and then someone takes all the money from the hard work you put in
@@FireGodSpeed Wrong. "Teran personally obtained more than $6 million in personal profit, which he used to sustain a lavish lifestyle. " "The government requests that the Court set a restitution hearing to determine an appropriate restitution amount. The PSR set restitution in the amount of $1,464,717.90. (PSR at 24-25). The government is actively working to obtain information from other victims, which is a substantial undertaking because the majority of victims reside outside of the United States. The government has recently expanded its notification efforts to include Spanish-language notifications and is further widening its public outreach. A future restitution hearing would afford sufficient time for additional victims involved in this case to come forward. "
UA-cam needs to add an option where you can fight a claim due to lack of standing or fraud. It is so archaic that the CLAIMER gets to decided whether to drop the claim, which they absolutely never do. I talked to a UA-cam rep about this once and the only real advice they gave was "seek legal counsel". So for small creators like me, we are basically screwed.
These dumb rules are probs older than some of youtubes reps at this point lmao. Data analysis has come so far since the days of ray william johnson and =3, when these rules were necessary. They just don’t care because they think these rules don’t hurt youtube, just creators
Well, if you are a smaller creator then you could always take UA-cam to small claims court. It doesn't cost much and usually lawyers aren't allowed. It's basically like Judge Judy. If UA-cam doesn't send someone to show up then you automatically win.
The people commenting on this are clowns, the majority of people were defending Gary Bowser when he did the same thing, now everyone is celebrating this Charlie included? Charlie and his fan base are absolute trash hypocrites.
There have been copyright troll attorneys that have gotten 14+ year sentences & this guy only got 5? Plus it's not like they're gonna take away all of his money. He's still gonna comeback to whatever mansion he bought, the cars, etc. just like "omi in a hellcat." I would argue this guy did just as much damage if not more than any copyright troll attorney.
As a musician I cannot tell you how frustrating it is how easily some random person can just claim your music. There are processes you have to go through to get the copy right back to it's original owner, but it's so much hassle when the original person that stole it basically just said "yeah that's mine."
I'm in a similar boat. Are there any prophylactic measures small artists can take to stop their music from being claimed by others? Does having everything on Spotify or registered with ASCAP
@derekalexandersmith definitely with your P.R.O. it might be a slow process to get your rights back. But at least with registering your tracks with ASCAP, BMI, etc. You already have the intial rights. So ultimately youll have a strong case.
Look here, Jay z was going to buy his child a new 120 inch plasma screen television, now thanks to these pirates he can only afford the 100 inch plasma screen. Still think piracy is cool?
@@derekalexandersmith You can create another account and copyright strike your own songs so you still get all the revenue, youtube doesn't care about the copyright system enough to stop you, they don't even stop others from copyright striking other people's videos unrighteously.
5 years feels WAY too lucky, bro deserved at least 10 or more. He dosent deserve the luck. There’s literally people who get more then 5 years for stupid things while this dude gets 5. Absolutely infuriating.
Someone falsely convicts you of a horrible crime: 20 years Stealing revenue from artists who need it by using UA-cam’s broken copyright system: 5 years
This seems a little like a pawn shop hosting your item for sale for the profit without buying it, then some dude comes in and claims it's his, with his mate who backs him up and the pawn shop just hands it over no questions asked. Until the pawn shop actually gets punished for their stupid, there's no justice being served.
@@patrikgajcevic8123that’s if he hasn’t spent it or offshored it or something. Even if he has to pay it back over time with interest, if he withdraws it and invests it, he’ll still make money.
Let's be real here...5 years (actually probably like, at most, with good behavior, 2-1/2 years) with a 1.4M dollar fine for 23M dollars revenue? This guy didn’t get a punishment, he got a weak slap on the wrist.
Idk man. People all over the video are commenting on the "weak" sentence that he got. But he got 2 years. 2 years is probably enough for rehabilitation. The guy didn't commit any murder. And I am quite sure all his stolen money will be seized. Getting even 2 years of jail time will also hinder the guy's ability to get employment, so yes, there is a permanent punishment he will be facing for the rest of his life
I'd happily go to jail for 5 years if I was offered that much money. Just give me books to read and maybe a few hours to walk in the jail garden so I can stay functional.
The important question is whether the $20 million were seized from the scammers or not. 5 years is getting off easy and last thing you'd want is for them to still have even a cent of that money when they return.
If other comments are to be believed, he was ordered to retun $1.4M of it. So basically nothing. I'd spend 5 years in prison for $20M every single day. It's basically like having a job that pays $4M a year.
@Lightn0x the date for the restitution hearing hasn’t been set yet. They mentioned $1.4 million in the article but they are still looking for other victims. The final amount won’t be decided until the restitution hearing is complete. That article also said that the $23 million that was scammed was split between at least 5 other co conspirators
@@Lightn0xll his money was seized. Only 1.4 million of it was returned to the victims because of logistics. It would be dumb if he was allowed to keep all that money when they knew how much was stolen
All you have to do as scammer is to gift that money to family or invest it outside of country you live, preferably in country with no extradition laws like Argentina and you will never have to return anything. I don't think there was single person in history of USA to actually pay what court ordered. It's almost always settled outside courtroom at much much lower sum as most scammers will have very little if any money that can be connected to them. I worked in European IRS for years then as accountant, trust me they will not pay anything, they will return to same scam in matter of days, we even got some people continue to do scamms from within prisons by proxies... It's YT that needs to change it's policy or nothing will change
The worst part is that if they hadn't been quite so egregiously greedy, if they just cut and ran at 6 or 7 mil, shut it down and walked away, they probably would have zero repercussions.
They still have zero repercussions, 5 years, (2 1/5 years at least with good behavior) on top of a small fine that he can easily pay off with the money he made. He didn't suffer anything but a couple years with nothing else
I've encountered so many obviously false auto-generated youtube songs on youtube music it's insane. The saddest part is, they're usually stolen from overseas producers like from japan china etc especially vocaloid music which the original artist didn't get to release for straming yet. It's absolutely sad
@@dakotareid1566Sooo he still has 21.6M? In exchange for 5 years of his life? So more then 4M a year, bro just got a very well-paying job at this point.
UA-cam is complicit in an astronomical amount of illegal activity, and they tacitly encourage it. The problem is they have essentially unlimited money from Google which means huge law teams that no one wants to go up against.
Legally speaking what youtube does is the safest route. They involve themselves as little as possible so in case something goes wrong the 2 parties are supposed to duke it out in court and not be able to involve youtube. On the other hand if youtube reviewed the claims then they would be an active participant, meaning every time a fake claim comes up they would be included in the lawsuits.
@Select2Play at this point there has been so many false claims there is no possible way that youtube hasn't reviewed at least 1 of them they should be held accountable for their blatant complacency to what is very obviously happening and has been happening under their noses for over a decade now. They cannot hide behind the bs "We didn't see it happen" argument at this point especially when so many prominent youtubers have either called them out for allowing it or flamed them on Twitter about it
@@ProfSplendorFactionespcially when youtubes team is more than aware of false copyrights in the music industry. They should be held accountable for being bad at their jobs
You're assuming that the legal system treats individuals as being on an equal footing with corporations. It does not - corporations have far more rights and weight than individuals do. Welcome to America.
Right? I see so many scams and scam ads, and yet they put more time into fucking over honest content creators than protecting users from actual villains.
Bruh. They don't even bother trying to fix the bot problem on here, you think they give enough of a shit to deal with something actually legally dubious?
@@PodpolkovnikGeorgeCostanza there are many ways to help yourself, scamming is one of the most scum options and it just builds a reputation youll regret to live by. Its something that you do and can very unlikely go back on, bless their souls
Can we agree that this isn't about protecting artists or users, but about the money record companies could have stolen from creators, getting stolen from them?
Initially it was made easy to calm the companies down on how easy it would be for them to copyright claim their content on the platform. But like any goodwill based systems its only a matter of time before people realize the possible exploits.
I just saw an ad on UA-cam for this kind of scam last night for the first time, and was thinking how scummy it sounded the whole time. They shoulda made an example out of this guy
5:58 wow it's almost like it's UA-cam's fault for allowing this type of shit to have even occurred. Maybe every single person who approved his royalties or whatever should get 5 years in jail too.
I dunno what people expect from the company that's been actively helping kiddy fiddler rings get around and share money/tips/data They've been very much against the "common man" for a long time. If you ain't got high up connections that are out there diddling little ones, Google is not your friend, you are their prey
Imagine if he stole that money from a bank, he would have way longer sentence. But justice system seems to think its not a big deal when it comes to this situation
The real issue here is that there are almost always no repercussions for issuing fake claims or takedowns, from youtube or the law, unless they are really brazen about it.
I don’t know how UA-cam can just continue to have such a terribly flawed system for so many years. They make so much money and can’t even fix something so simple, what an embarrassment.
The biggest take away is just how broken UA-cam copyright system still is even after over a decade. I remember when PewDiePie just mentioned Despacito in a video title, didn't even play the song (half attempted a couple chords on a guitar) and the video was claimed 27 times for a song _that wasn't played in the video._ So 27 people, individuals or parasitic legal firms, claimed the video saying they represented the copyright holder, and UA-cam said 'oh, yeah, seems legit'.
Jim Sterling had this problem for so long, they usually only take money from Patreon and leave all the youtube video completely ads free, people would false claim the videos and put ads on it, so they decided to copy right claim the videos first and deny all the ads to be placed on the videos
Honestly it’s a shame how low brow some sentences are for financial crimes in the United States. It seems like even a grand larceny charge (stealing more than 10,000$ in stuff) often gets people more time than more white collar esque crimes like embezzlement etc.
grand larceny charges are NOT 10k, it's like a few hundred/thousand... i got hit with grand larceny over like $800 that i didn't even take(the fuckin kid blacked out drunk and put it in his glove box and literally was dropping 100s on the ground and lost soooo much money and then him and his mom were mad so called the cops and said we stole it, which is why it ended up getting dropped) so it's ABSOLUTELY not 10,000.
My theory for why financial crimes get such light sentences is because then it sets a precident that benifits certain groups of people. Like politicians.
So instead of temporarily redirecting ad revenue to an intermediate state, then determining if the claim was real and then awarding said revenue to proper side upon finding that out... they just give it away to whoever randomly makes the claim? Who the hell thought that was a great idea, and fire whoever hired that person!
Get the fact checkers to verify people. That was a joke. Fake IDs, identity theft, database hacking, government oversight beaurocracy will make the whole thing a mess. It either proves their incompetence or gives them even more authority to access your information.
@@Mi_Fa_Volareit’s amazing how safe harbor isn’t revoked by this alone, the IRS had to catch these people, google and youtube would have let this happen forever with their hands off approach.
it’s not like youtube doesn’t know, there’s no way in hell they don’t have a system that would flag this kind of thing down, random people claiming hundreds of videos yet they’re somehow oblivious to it
UA-cam seriously needs to have a penalty system against content ID/copyright abusers. Like the community strike system, there needs to be consequences to remove abusers and make it harder for these people to profit off this abuse to this level.
I love how they say it's a hefty sentence but if if he stole the same amount from a bank or company he would have gone into the slammer for 10 to 15 years
I ha e heard of some people creating a secondary channel to copyright claim their main account videos so they can at least still get paid if others claim their content.
An old con artist once said "it's more profitable to ask for forgiveness than permission for anything" but scammers gunna scam and stupid people gunna pay that's how it works
I'm 2 months behind on rent, have $100 to my name, have medical bills for health issues that keep me from working, and yet I still am not doing this kind of shady shit. Fuck scammers man, it just makes it sting that much more.
@@JohnDoe-rh7vh Literally have no idea, recent cat scan, chest x-ray, blood tests, urine tests, EKG, and tests for mono/strep/COVID all have come up empty handed. Docs and I are at a loss. Chest pain that begins when I start working on physically demanding or cognitively challenging tasks and gets worse if I try pushing through it, persistent vertigo that'll randomly appear and last for hours, headaches, mental fogginess/confusion that randomly pops up, and a bad cough. I'll be contacting my grad school's (master's program, unpaid) student emergency fund, so there's at least possible help, but I'm unsure how much they can help. It is what it is.
The worst though is actually the big companies who constantly DMCA little guys (even though they're not actually infringing), and they don't have the big suits and lawyers to fight back
It baffles me to no end how a human being can do something so absolutely vile to ANOTHER human being without being remorseful enough to think twice. the world we currently live in is absurd
Heartless criminals like this have always existed. The only thing the modern world changed about the situation is by giving them a wider variety of mechanisms to commit their crimes.
@@chadhinkley7532 I dont think its something new, I think its just ridiculous its still considered human nature to be enemies of your own kind What im trying to say is, something clearly needs to change. Unfortunately, as one individual person among the millions of people, im unable to do anything. Im just expressing my concerns for the world we live in
It's really time youtube is found accountable for this. If it happens once, they can claim they weren't aware of the flaw but now that there are multiple offenders and it's become public knowledge they have no excuses, they are knowingly allowing the scams to happen.
This kind of stuff has been happening for around a decade now and little to nothing has ever been done. Even after all of the viral controversies they've had, little ever changes and what does change is usually for the worse.
I know of a content creator who was getting copyright claimed for playing their own music they created with their band during their various streams. Someone also copyright claimed a clip of theirs that had “cricket noises” in it. The system is absolute exploitable abs broken.
@@samuelfaille-denis8098we need a big law firm who's tech savvy to spearhead this lawsuit. This is completely insane. I wonder how many people are upset at the music creators for claiming AD revenue, when in reality it's some douche trying to move out of their parents basement.
We need strictor punishments and more work put in to stop scammers. Not to say the people working on this aren't working hard, they're doing amazing work, but we need more of them
More people like him will just keep on milking UA-cam's copyright system, and UA-cam will continue to let it happen and do absolutely nothing about it.
Download Opera GX here operagx.gg/Penguinz018
no
Didn't they get caught selling a load of peoples data
@@wednesdeityevery company does. They’re good if you don’t use extensions or anything like that and just need a convenient browser but it’s not that great to run and customize outside of looks that I’ve seen in reviews. I don’t like it but I’m just so used to chrome and all it’s abilities
Cool
@@Ohnoitswomp idk I remember them being in a controversy so surely it's a little more than every company does
the fact he was able to do this just shows how horrible this platforms copyright system is
no kidding
good to see you here love the vids and music
It’s been dogshit forever
yeah youtube gotta do a entire factory reset and have actual people moderating. not just bots
PACKGOOOOOOOD
Nintendo would've put this guy in prison for 50 lifetimes and demanded 50 million dollars from him.
Yeah copyright is no joke
I post the best videos on UA-cam 🙏
yep sounds about right
understatement
@@Patrick-xk9sj why hello there troll
It's not that Jose and co. need harsher punishments, it's that UA-cam itself needs to be held responsible for the fraud out of sheer negligence.
It's both. Jose got off WAAAAAAY too easy for that kind of money, and UA-cam needs to get it's shit together, they aren't mutually exclusive
Exactly! It's sheer laziness to just allow whoTFever to claim a video and immediately start taking their revenue, without question or proof. I get that there's a law, but YT is enacting this in the most hands-off way possible and it only ever hurts innocent content creators.
@Chainmastress34did he also do this
Yeah I agree. UA-cam needs to take some of the blame for this. It keeps happening under their watch and they are not doing anything about.. ya know why? It's probably because they are gonna have to hire actual people to work in the copyright department which means less revenue for investors. So they rely on algorithms cuz it's cheap. Obviously.
Yeah, nah. Both things can be true. It isn’t hard.
Since UA-cam is facilitating these kinds of scams they should be held accountable as well.
Lol the head of google wants to have a word with you, can you just stare out into this sunset for us please 😂
If we don’t hear from you we know what happened youtube ceo really need to re evaluate there stance on things like this
Protecting scammers with lazy systems
It always becomes an unusually sad and heavy court case when the victims are somehow complicit in facilitating their own theft. You can not get away with doing nothing to stop the thieves when they are not even armed to hurt you!
sell $23 of weed: prison for life. steal $23m in copyright claims: prison for 5 years
idk what country you are from but they stopped taking you to jail for weed back in 2008
Law is broken in every aspect
Name one place in USA where this is still practice
this is america
its really fucking sad isn't it
weed is harmless, yet lives are literally being ended because of it (prison)
while stealing literally millions of dollars is just a 5 year sentence
very fair indeed
@@imtoxicAFhe lives in the U.S
Considering that people can get 10 years in jail for possessing a little bit of drugs, then 5 years is not enough for the guy that stole 23 million.
500k per month 😅
It's just a bad argument. Having one dumb punishment doesn't excuse another
The people commenting on this are clowns, the majority of people were defending Gary Bowser when he did the same thing, now everyone is celebrating this Charlie included? Charlie and his fan base are absolute trash hypocrites.
You gotta have a lot of dope to get 10 years
Imagine stealing 23 millions the old fashioned way, like a man in a real heist… you wouldn’t see the light of day again..
5 years for $23 million without having to give it back? Out on good behavior in like 2-3 years? Worth it
I still do not encourage or endorse committing any sort of grand larceny or theft on the internet just because you know there is a light sentence for stealing music money from other users. 5 years and 10 months in prison will feel even longer when you actually experience that prison time for yourself. I wish I knew enough about UA-cam to know how false copyright strikes will eventually harm the bottom line of the higher-ups, and not just the bottom line of individual users.
I'd take a 5 year timeout for 23M in a heartbeat holy shit. The court may as well be begging for it to happen again.
Don’t make me get the fly swatter
then start copyright claiming
You’re a bum 😂
Right!
I would trade that right now!
Five years in jail is NOTHING
Same the only thing is the restitution if they make him pay a certain amount and that's the only thing that could suck cuz if u don't pay u go to jail again and again like child support but out of 23 million I know he still has alot somewhere and they probably only charged him less than 3 or 4 million restitution when he gets out unless he made a deal and gave them a couple million when he got prosecuted
The fact that You Tube allows this to happen and people have been complaining about it for YEARS is absolutely egregious.
Poor small indie company!!
GET THAT PORNBOT BANNED
The people commenting on this are clowns, the majority of people were defending Gary Bowser when he did the same thing, now everyone is celebrating this Charlie included? Charlie and his fan base are absolute trash hypocrites.
Those should have given em 25+ for every mill he stole then have every account frozen/deleted inc his social Media accounts
They don't allow this to happen, they encourage it and support the scammers
5 years means he's serving a day for each 12600 dollars that he's stolen. When's the last time you stole twelve thousand dollars and got a day of punishment for it?
Unbelievable for us poors, right? But laws are designed to be slipped by the wealthy. Hell, remember that story about how Elon stole emeralds worth tens of thousands from his dad as a kid? Just normal things for these kinds of people - it’s like stealing a toothbrush to them.
Bro, I'm WILLINGLY going that 70 months if it means I walk away with 23 million clams. That is an EASY price to pay. I'm about to know every inmate by name and have secret handshakes with like a third of em.
@@luislatinoman7055literally
@@luislatinoman7055there would be fines as well, I'm sure he's not walking away with the 23 mil that easy 😂
He needs to pay it back.
This really high-lights how batshit inane UA-cams approach to copyright is. “Hey that’s mine” seems to be all it takes. Their only concern seems to be removing themselves from any liability at the expense of their own content creators.
The law should consider crimes like these as Grand Larceny. It is the same thing as stealing 23 million dollars from a bank. Give him a life sentence please
Wow. That is very sad and pathetic how UA-cam's community guidelines and rules against false copyright claims and false copyright strikes, do not value the security of their users like a real bank. They do not take cheaters of the copyright system seriously enough to de-incentivize these offenses from happening again simply because they think they are big enough to recover from this. UA-cam wrongfully assumes that no grand larceny will be grand enough to shut them down forever, not even shut them down for a short week.
Bro got off so easy these people are the worst
Hopefully he drops the soap in prison
bro its fucking internet ads 1 week would be too much
Sad part of reality he should be deemed 30-50 years
Taking most of his life away as he deserves just as much as scammers these days
I’d go hang out in a non maxamum prison for 5 years for 23 mil
If you stole $20 million from a bank, or embezzled it from some company, you'd never get out of jail.
was looking for this comment
But if you steal it from artists and creators ah just a lil slap on the wrist
But if you steal it from artists and creators ah just a lil slap on the wrist
@@NeonBeeCatwe heard you the first time bro ☠️
@@snigily3137ever heard of two replies glitch?😂🤡
Class action against yt for negligence? Haven't they done nothing to stop this for years and years? Feels like they're helping the scammers
“The only lives that truly matter are those who respect the lives of others”.
rofl no just no
Also, if you contest the copyright claim, the "company" who claimed it gets to decide whether or not it was a false claim, which they never do of course. Can't believe youtube still doesn't recognize this as a major oversight in their platform.
For real
I post the best videos on UA-cam 🙏
It’s insane. We had an old song get claimed by someone because 2 seconds of it sounded like a couple notes from their own song _that was uploaded several years after ours_ 😂 Fortunately it was one we hadn’t cared about for years & it’s not like we ever got big views, so it didn’t matter much.
We did try to contest it at the time for the hell of it though, and exactly what you said happens...is what happened.
“Oh well whatever” & all, but when it happens to a relatively popular artist/band/creator I can only imagine how frustrating it is
Oh they definitely know but either don't care or think they need to keep it this way to avoid getting into hot water with other companies and the law.
It’s a mystery how UA-cam maintains safe harbor despite not doing anything to stop copyright fraud
As a person who got scammed out of $2,000, it really warms my heart to see someone face justice for their crimes
Absolutely ditto
@@input00nah
Those damn Nigerian Princes.
@@JediSimpson actually it wasn't that. It was something completely different
As a person...
0:02 Bottom left corner dog wakes up
Between the copyright claim scammers, the copyright claim abuses by legit publishers, and the outright wrong copyright claims being asserted by UA-cam, I hope that there is eventually a class action lawsuit against UA-cam for their accommodation and facilitation of all of it. In an age where AI can identify and discern and analyze and report, it is ridiculous how all of these scams and abuses are possible at all, which has gotta make you wonder how much YT profits from allowing it all.
My other UA-cam account is currently muted for saying lgbt members shouldn't try to eff kids.
@@EfIsForFoxtrot you're right but why LGBT specifically?
@@EfIsForFoxtrot yeah literally any idiot reporting you, or if you write *swear word* YOU, or YOU *swear word* it will auto delete comment if you post and then likely give a 24 hour mute, it's fucking pathetic and if you just swear too much in general. i swear alot and it's CONSTANTLY giving me the "R U SURE U WANNA POST THIS ITS SOOOO MEAN!!!!!!:(" bullshit popups, where if you click anyways it INSTA auto deletes/doesn't even post, and after a few times in a single day it triggers a mute... it's a joke now
Can't believe UA-cam let one of their accomplices go to jail. Truly there's no honor among thieves.
Yea this guy scammed, but UA-cam didn’t notice this for 5 years? This is UA-cam’s fault more than anything
So where was this energy from Charlie when he covered Gary Bowser? Oh wait I forgot Charlie is the worst kind of hypocrite.
GET THAT PORNBOT BANNED
UA-cam is the primary profiteer as they get a percentage regardless of who wins the claim. This is clear selective enforcement. If the DA hasnt prosecuted anyone else (namely youtube), they are selectively choosing who and when to prosecute which is unenforceable. This guy needs to appeal. The entire judicial system is illegitimate.
@@Bfkcjscbsnjcmoist hypocritical
Here we go again with another scammer going to jail. Always love the entertainment and justice being served.
I EXPLAINED WHY PENGUINZ IS BAD
Don't translate..
ในเวลาไม่กี่ชั่วโมง หัวใจของคุณจะเริ่มหยุดเต้น วิธีเดียวที่จะป้องกันไม่ให้สิ่งนี้คือสมัครรับข้อมูลจากช่องของฉัน
たひ…
Dont let me see you in these comments again🙅♂️🙅♂️ I will spread yo cheeks lil bro😈😈🙏🙏
Literally all these replies are bots
Penguinz0 ispires me.. My parents said if I get 15k followers They'd buy me a better camera for recording..begging u guys, literally beggin
One of the things I find to be super irritating is when you pay to license sound packs in perpetuity and mix some audio for a video from it, and then some a**hole copyrights your video because they licensed the same audio pack and used it for some song they made. It’s just so irritating that UA-cam allows this to happen. I’m glad this guy got fried for it, but it need to happen more. There’s a ton of this bullsh!t going around. It’s infuriating.
Imagine working your whole life on your craft to finally be able to share it on the internet and then someone takes all the money from the hard work you put in
For 5 years, he made 90k a week. He'd probably go in thinking it was worth it. The only bigger scam than his scam was the prison sentence.
You do understand he'll have to pay restitution, right?
@@Arancil We will see how much he has to pay back lmao i will make a guess right now.. Stolen 23mil he has to pay 15mil So still easy 8 mil
@@FireGodSpeed Wrong.
"Teran personally obtained more than $6 million in personal profit, which he used to sustain a lavish lifestyle. "
"The government requests that the Court set a restitution hearing to determine an appropriate restitution amount. The PSR set restitution in the amount of $1,464,717.90. (PSR at 24-25). The government is actively working to obtain information from other victims, which is a substantial undertaking because the majority of victims reside outside of the United States. The government has recently expanded its notification efforts to include Spanish-language notifications and is further widening its public outreach. A future restitution hearing would afford sufficient time for additional victims involved in this case to come forward. "
I'll happily take 5 years for 20 mill
@@Arancil It's highly likely that it will be way much less than 23 million after the 5 year sentence.
UA-cam needs to add an option where you can fight a claim due to lack of standing or fraud. It is so archaic that the CLAIMER gets to decided whether to drop the claim, which they absolutely never do. I talked to a UA-cam rep about this once and the only real advice they gave was "seek legal counsel". So for small creators like me, we are basically screwed.
These dumb rules are probs older than some of youtubes reps at this point lmao. Data analysis has come so far since the days of ray william johnson and =3, when these rules were necessary. They just don’t care because they think these rules don’t hurt youtube, just creators
Yeah all people want is literally a place where they can provide evidence when a claim is based on nothing lol is that so much to ask for
GRT THAT PORNBOT BANNED
Well, if you are a smaller creator then you could always take UA-cam to small claims court. It doesn't cost much and usually lawyers aren't allowed. It's basically like Judge Judy. If UA-cam doesn't send someone to show up then you automatically win.
The people commenting on this are clowns, the majority of people were defending Gary Bowser when he did the same thing, now everyone is celebrating this Charlie included? Charlie and his fan base are absolute trash hypocrites.
Bruh if he stole 23 mil from anything but UA-cam he would have been on the FBIs most wanted and given multiple life sentences
There have been copyright troll attorneys that have gotten 14+ year sentences & this guy only got 5? Plus it's not like they're gonna take away all of his money. He's still gonna comeback to whatever mansion he bought, the cars, etc. just like "omi in a hellcat." I would argue this guy did just as much damage if not more than any copyright troll attorney.
As a musician I cannot tell you how frustrating it is how easily some random person can just claim your music. There are processes you have to go through to get the copy right back to it's original owner, but it's so much hassle when the original person that stole it basically just said "yeah that's mine."
I'm in a similar boat. Are there any prophylactic measures small artists can take to stop their music from being claimed by others? Does having everything on Spotify or registered with ASCAP
@derekalexandersmith definitely with your P.R.O. it might be a slow process to get your rights back. But at least with registering your tracks with ASCAP, BMI, etc. You already have the intial rights. So ultimately youll have a strong case.
Look here, Jay z was going to buy his child a new 120 inch plasma screen television, now thanks to these pirates he can only afford the 100 inch plasma screen.
Still think piracy is cool?
i think i saw someone say you can copyright yourself to avoid getting scammed is that possible or no
@@derekalexandersmith You can create another account and copyright strike your own songs so you still get all the revenue, youtube doesn't care about the copyright system enough to stop you, they don't even stop others from copyright striking other people's videos unrighteously.
If only all scammers can get arrested like this.
What the hell is with the spams-
Penguinz0 ispires me.. My parents said if I get 15k followers They'd buy me a better camera for recording..begging u guys, literally beggin
I think these bots should be arrested because they’re scamming people for attention
Say goodbye to the entire population of the Middle East
Jake Paul needs to be locked up first.
Only 5 years? Damn bruh, thats basically vehicular manslaughter. And shoplifters have gotten more time than that.
I love Charlie's ability to make me care about things I didn't even know existed
I would say this Scammer got its Payback
Yo, it's Pierogi! Didn't know you watched Charlie!
I was confused on how you haven’t gotten many likes, then I saw, 45 mins ago
Boss haha. Scammers are losers haha
yo P, didn’t expect u here. love what u do, and keep up the work “deleting there files” 🫡
crikey, its the scambaitian rozzers
5 years feels WAY too lucky, bro deserved at least 10 or more. He dosent deserve the luck. There’s literally people who get more then 5 years for stupid things while this dude gets 5. Absolutely infuriating.
>sells weed gets 20 to life.
>Steals 23 million and commits large scale fraud, gets 5 years in low security prison.
My farts are better than Charlie’s farts 💨
I would spend 5 years in prison for 23 million bro
@@grants.231you know he’s gonna have to pay that back right?
Someone falsely convicts you of a horrible crime: 20 years
Stealing revenue from artists who need it by using UA-cam’s broken copyright system: 5 years
This seems a little like a pawn shop hosting your item for sale for the profit without buying it, then some dude comes in and claims it's his, with his mate who backs him up and the pawn shop just hands it over no questions asked.
Until the pawn shop actually gets punished for their stupid, there's no justice being served.
They need to take everything they bought with the money and take the money away from them as well
I imagine there's a lot of people who would be willing to go to jail for 5 years for $23 million dollars. He really is getting off easy.
I’d do it in a heart beat
He's obviously not keeping the money
@@patrikgajcevic8123that’s if he hasn’t spent it or offshored it or something. Even if he has to pay it back over time with interest, if he withdraws it and invests it, he’ll still make money.
@@patrikgajcevic8123 that is not that obvious in cases like this, do you have a source for this?
@patrikgajcevic8123 how? Ask me for your money back. See how "I don't have it", "I already spend it". What you gonna do? I'm already going to jail 🙃
Let's be real here...5 years (actually probably like, at most, with good behavior, 2-1/2 years) with a 1.4M dollar fine for 23M dollars revenue? This guy didn’t get a punishment, he got a weak slap on the wrist.
No parole in the federal system.
Yeah I gotta be honest, if you told me I could have $23m at the tradeoff of spending only 5 years in prison you can sign me right the fuck up
@@brvcifer exactly
@@jasonmartinez9545you don't keep the money man
Idk man. People all over the video are commenting on the "weak" sentence that he got. But he got 2 years. 2 years is probably enough for rehabilitation. The guy didn't commit any murder. And I am quite sure all his stolen money will be seized. Getting even 2 years of jail time will also hinder the guy's ability to get employment, so yes, there is a permanent punishment he will be facing for the rest of his life
I'd happily go to jail for 5 years if I was offered that much money. Just give me books to read and maybe a few hours to walk in the jail garden so I can stay functional.
wooow thats crazy, thanks for the insight Charlie
The important question is whether the $20 million were seized from the scammers or not. 5 years is getting off easy and last thing you'd want is for them to still have even a cent of that money when they return.
If other comments are to be believed, he was ordered to retun $1.4M of it. So basically nothing. I'd spend 5 years in prison for $20M every single day. It's basically like having a job that pays $4M a year.
now that the government knows he got that much they will want a huge piece of that. he probably paid the government so he only got 5 years
@Lightn0x the date for the restitution hearing hasn’t been set yet. They mentioned $1.4 million in the article but they are still looking for other victims. The final amount won’t be decided until the restitution hearing is complete. That article also said that the $23 million that was scammed was split between at least 5 other co conspirators
@@Lightn0xll his money was seized. Only 1.4 million of it was returned to the victims because of logistics. It would be dumb if he was allowed to keep all that money when they knew how much was stolen
All you have to do as scammer is to gift that money to family or invest it outside of country you live, preferably in country with no extradition laws like Argentina and you will never have to return anything. I don't think there was single person in history of USA to actually pay what court ordered. It's almost always settled outside courtroom at much much lower sum as most scammers will have very little if any money that can be connected to them. I worked in European IRS for years then as accountant, trust me they will not pay anything, they will return to same scam in matter of days, we even got some people continue to do scamms from within prisons by proxies... It's YT that needs to change it's policy or nothing will change
The worst part is that if they hadn't been quite so egregiously greedy, if they just cut and ran at 6 or 7 mil, shut it down and walked away, they probably would have zero repercussions.
Have to wonder how many did just that
@@ClassicPopble We're better off not knowing.
They still have zero repercussions, 5 years, (2 1/5 years at least with good behavior) on top of a small fine that he can easily pay off with the money he made. He didn't suffer anything but a couple years with nothing else
@@justanotherviewer9643how?
Sooo true probably will only have to spend 2 and a half years away at most and gets over 20m I would do that trade away without even thinking twice
I've encountered so many obviously false auto-generated youtube songs on youtube music it's insane. The saddest part is, they're usually stolen from overseas producers like from japan china etc especially vocaloid music which the original artist didn't get to release for straming yet. It's absolutely sad
It's like UA-cam wants these scammers to go ham
If he doesn't lose the money from the scam then 5 years really is lenient.
If you rob a bank and get caught you dont just get to keep the money after your jail time is over lmao
Probably used that money for hiring the best lawyers. Maybe losing 5 years of your life, but after that retired with millions lol
@@Datodahe was only ordered to pay 1.4 million in restitution
@@dakotareid1566Sooo he still has 21.6M? In exchange for 5 years of his life? So more then 4M a year, bro just got a very well-paying job at this point.
Lmao only 5 years of prison and you keep 20m. If anything this sounds like a great paying job.
UA-cam should be sued for being complacent in royalty fraud and for allowing this to continue blatantly
UA-cam is complicit in an astronomical amount of illegal activity, and they tacitly encourage it. The problem is they have essentially unlimited money from Google which means huge law teams that no one wants to go up against.
Legally speaking what youtube does is the safest route. They involve themselves as little as possible so in case something goes wrong the 2 parties are supposed to duke it out in court and not be able to involve youtube. On the other hand if youtube reviewed the claims then they would be an active participant, meaning every time a fake claim comes up they would be included in the lawsuits.
@Select2Play at this point there has been so many false claims there is no possible way that youtube hasn't reviewed at least 1 of them they should be held accountable for their blatant complacency to what is very obviously happening and has been happening under their noses for over a decade now. They cannot hide behind the bs "We didn't see it happen" argument at this point especially when so many prominent youtubers have either called them out for allowing it or flamed them on Twitter about it
@@ProfSplendorFactionespcially when youtubes team is more than aware of false copyrights in the music industry. They should be held accountable for being bad at their jobs
You're assuming that the legal system treats individuals as being on an equal footing with corporations. It does not - corporations have far more rights and weight than individuals do. Welcome to America.
I like how they didn't bother doing anything about until the government realized they were not getting their cut.
Okay but the “smile checkpoint” got me I needed that lil giggle today
I hate that UA-cam isn't doing enough work to prevent this type of bullshittery this dude should of gotten at least 15 to 20 years
Right? I see so many scams and scam ads, and yet they put more time into fucking over honest content creators than protecting users from actual villains.
It's because they couldn't. If they do, they would loose a prevision that makes them unresponsible for the content they host. It's just the law.
@@Max128ping
How does preventing and verifying false copyright have anything to do with law?
Bruh. They don't even bother trying to fix the bot problem on here, you think they give enough of a shit to deal with something actually legally dubious?
LET'S LEAVE THEN
FFS
It always makes me warm in my heart to see a scammer suffer in their own karma. Thank you for this Charlie.
These fucking bots are insane.
@@input00omg yay I won't subscribe
@@lou06757don’t care
Penguinz0 ispires me.. My parents said if I get 15k followers They'd buy me a better camera for recording..begging u guys, literally beggin
@@PodpolkovnikGeorgeCostanza there are many ways to help yourself, scamming is one of the most scum options and it just builds a reputation youll regret to live by. Its something that you do and can very unlikely go back on, bless their souls
UA-cam needs to pay for giving artist funds to scam artists.
Honestly, this just shows the huge problem with UA-cam’s policy & system. It should not be that _severely_ easy to abuse, esp with money involved.
I would trade 5 years for 23 million in a heartbeat. He definitely got off easy.
Can we agree that this isn't about protecting artists or users, but about the money record companies could have stolen from creators, getting stolen from them?
Initially it was made easy to calm the companies down on how easy it would be for them to copyright claim their content on the platform. But like any goodwill based systems its only a matter of time before people realize the possible exploits.
Look no further than piracy in the early 2000s. The eagle will always go infinity and beyond to protect the music industry corporations.
This says something very important about how terrible UA-cam's copyright enforcement is.
I just saw an ad on UA-cam for this kind of scam last night for the first time, and was thinking how scummy it sounded the whole time. They shoulda made an example out of this guy
5:58 wow it's almost like it's UA-cam's fault for allowing this type of shit to have even occurred. Maybe every single person who approved his royalties or whatever should get 5 years in jail too.
Charlies bringing up an insanely good point. UA-cam is a great website, but has so much loopholes for people to exploit from actual creators.
I dunno what people expect from the company that's been actively helping kiddy fiddler rings get around and share money/tips/data
They've been very much against the "common man" for a long time. If you ain't got high up connections that are out there diddling little ones, Google is not your friend, you are their prey
This is what happens they rely on bots to check everything to cut cost of having real people analayzing and reviewing claims.
Have always thought about how the concept of claiming was very loose ended and someone would eventually abuse it.
Imagine if he stole that money from a bank, he would have way longer sentence. But justice system seems to think its not a big deal when it comes to this situation
The real issue here is that there are almost always no repercussions for issuing fake claims or takedowns, from youtube or the law, unless they are really brazen about it.
that's just in general, false accusations that coukd ruin someone's life never have repercussions
why would they put you in for less time if they think you will commit the crime again.
I don’t know how UA-cam can just continue to have such a terribly flawed system for so many years. They make so much money and can’t even fix something so simple, what an embarrassment.
False copyright claims in general are so fustrating, especially since there isn't much you can do about it
You can organize an exodus...
The biggest take away is just how broken UA-cam copyright system still is even after over a decade.
I remember when PewDiePie just mentioned Despacito in a video title, didn't even play the song (half attempted a couple chords on a guitar) and the video was claimed 27 times for a song _that wasn't played in the video._
So 27 people, individuals or parasitic legal firms, claimed the video saying they represented the copyright holder, and UA-cam said 'oh, yeah, seems legit'.
Ratio😂😂😂
Nice Graf pfp
Jim Sterling had this problem for so long, they usually only take money from Patreon and leave all the youtube video completely ads free, people would false claim the videos and put ads on it, so they decided to copy right claim the videos first and deny all the ads to be placed on the videos
@@-dash. how did they copy right claim their own videos?
alt accounts probably
That smile checkpoint worked so hard, also i just now realised your icon pic isn't xavier renegade angel
Always good to see a scammer get what they deserve. They should've been harder on him though
Honestly it’s a shame how low brow some sentences are for financial crimes in the United States. It seems like even a grand larceny charge (stealing more than 10,000$ in stuff) often gets people more time than more white collar esque crimes like embezzlement etc.
Filling a false DMCA claim is Perjury and that carries a max sentence of 5 years.
Welcome to America where the rich get off easy and the poor are scrutinized for every little thing they do and eventually end up in jail as slaves.
He did it on 50 thousand songs though? Why only 5 years
grand larceny charges are NOT 10k, it's like a few hundred/thousand... i got hit with grand larceny over like $800 that i didn't even take(the fuckin kid blacked out drunk and put it in his glove box and literally was dropping 100s on the ground and lost soooo much money and then him and his mom were mad so called the cops and said we stole it, which is why it ended up getting dropped) so it's ABSOLUTELY not 10,000.
My theory for why financial crimes get such light sentences is because then it sets a precident that benifits certain groups of people. Like politicians.
So instead of temporarily redirecting ad revenue to an intermediate state, then determining if the claim was real and then awarding said revenue to proper side upon finding that out... they just give it away to whoever randomly makes the claim?
Who the hell thought that was a great idea, and fire whoever hired that person!
Get the fact checkers to verify people.
That was a joke.
Fake IDs, identity theft, database hacking, government oversight beaurocracy will make the whole thing a mess.
It either proves their incompetence or gives them even more authority to access your information.
Well now that everyone knows how easy it is get ready for a deluge of scammers doing the same trick
They should be taking youtube to court for allowing this scam to go on
The keyword is abedding crime. And how youtube handles things and even encourage that constitute that.
@@Mi_Fa_Volareit’s amazing how safe harbor isn’t revoked by this alone, the IRS had to catch these people, google and youtube would have let this happen forever with their hands off approach.
it’s not like youtube doesn’t know, there’s no way in hell they don’t have a system that would flag this kind of thing down, random people claiming hundreds of videos yet they’re somehow oblivious to it
The system designed to prevent intellectual property theft is essentially a thieve's toolkit for automated theft on a grand scale.
Well done, youtube!
Its good that someone finally got caught, but why aren't they pushing UA-cam and fining them if they don't change the monetization system?
Charlie telling me to smile at the smile checkpoint was the wholesomeness I needed today.
UA-cam seriously needs to have a penalty system against content ID/copyright abusers. Like the community strike system, there needs to be consequences to remove abusers and make it harder for these people to profit off this abuse to this level.
I love how they say it's a hefty sentence but if if he stole the same amount from a bank or company he would have gone into the slammer for 10 to 15 years
Robbery does not apply here.
There is a difference
@@carltonthepughe’s scamming, it’s theft lol
if he had drugs he would've been in for life
@@imb34r To be fair copyright claims are not violent or traumatizing.
@@carltonthepug Scamming by STEALING the copyright claim is still robbery, kid.
I ha e heard of some people creating a secondary channel to copyright claim their main account videos so they can at least still get paid if others claim their content.
An old con artist once said "it's more profitable to ask for forgiveness than permission for anything" but scammers gunna scam and stupid people gunna pay that's how it works
I'm 2 months behind on rent, have $100 to my name, have medical bills for health issues that keep me from working, and yet I still am not doing this kind of shady shit. Fuck scammers man, it just makes it sting that much more.
What kinda medical complications
@@JohnDoe-rh7vh Literally have no idea, recent cat scan, chest x-ray, blood tests, urine tests, EKG, and tests for mono/strep/COVID all have come up empty handed. Docs and I are at a loss. Chest pain that begins when I start working on physically demanding or cognitively challenging tasks and gets worse if I try pushing through it, persistent vertigo that'll randomly appear and last for hours, headaches, mental fogginess/confusion that randomly pops up, and a bad cough. I'll be contacting my grad school's (master's program, unpaid) student emergency fund, so there's at least possible help, but I'm unsure how much they can help. It is what it is.
This isn't going to change until a big company get crippled by this... but usually are those same companies that abuse it so...
was feeling down and now for the FIRST time i hear him "let me see a big smile on that face" really made my day huh thx big guy
The worst though is actually the big companies who constantly DMCA little guys (even though they're not actually infringing), and they don't have the big suits and lawyers to fight back
It baffles me to no end how a human being can do something so absolutely vile to ANOTHER human being without being remorseful enough to think twice. the world we currently live in is absurd
Heartless criminals like this have always existed. The only thing the modern world changed about the situation is by giving them a wider variety of mechanisms to commit their crimes.
The government has been doing it regular citizens since the invention of the government
You think this is something new? People were far worse to each other back then and even up until recently
@@chadhinkley7532 I dont think its something new, I think its just ridiculous its still considered human nature to be enemies of your own kind
What im trying to say is, something clearly needs to change. Unfortunately, as one individual person among the millions of people, im unable to do anything. Im just expressing my concerns for the world we live in
It's really time youtube is found accountable for this. If it happens once, they can claim they weren't aware of the flaw but now that there are multiple offenders and it's become public knowledge they have no excuses, they are knowingly allowing the scams to happen.
My farts are better than Charlie’s farts 💨
They scam us the most so why would they go after their fellow people?
The ad revenue should be held in limbo until the matter is settled. The scam would die immediately.
🤓🤓🤓🤓
This kind of stuff has been happening for around a decade now and little to nothing has ever been done. Even after all of the viral controversies they've had, little ever changes and what does change is usually for the worse.
5 years is going to become 2 years for "good behavior"
not often you see actual punishment happen in incidents like this, puts a smile on my face to see it happen.
Don't translate..
ในเวลาไม่กี่ชั่วโมง หัวใจของคุณจะเริ่มหยุดเต้น วิธีเดียวที่จะป้องกันไม่ให้สิ่งนี้คือสมัครรับข้อมูลจากช่องของฉัน
たひ…😮
Don't you do this too? 😮
GET THOSE BOTTERS BANNED
Dang four bots in one
To turn a blessing into a curse is one of the worst crimes imaginable
In Canada a guy just got 5 years for second degree murder, sentences are so lenient it's ridiculous
I know of a content creator who was getting copyright claimed for playing their own music they created with their band during their various streams. Someone also copyright claimed a clip of theirs that had “cricket noises” in it.
The system is absolute exploitable abs broken.
This feels like this has been going on for a decade it seems. Will UA-cam ever fix their DMCA system?
no
as far as youtube is concerned their system works perfectly; they don't get taken to court over it
@@samuelfaille-denis8098we need a big law firm who's tech savvy to spearhead this lawsuit. This is completely insane. I wonder how many people are upset at the music creators for claiming AD revenue, when in reality it's some douche trying to move out of their parents basement.
We need strictor punishments and more work put in to stop scammers. Not to say the people working on this aren't working hard, they're doing amazing work, but we need more of them
I am ver sure jose is going to get shived in prison before doing his 5 years times
That Operagx ad was really well done. Good job Charles, I’m proud of you.
All money earned from this scheme should be given to the artist.
Controversial opinion: I think we need more people to take advantage of the copyright system so UA-cam can actually put effort into fixing it.
Don't hate the player. Hate the game.
It doesn't because they know already and they just don't care
I do wonder how many people will see a video like this & decide to do it themselves for some easy doubloons 🤔
@@CantTellYou🤭🤭
@@CantTellYou probably some yea it's stupid but it won't stop till UA-cam starts to care for real.
More people like him will just keep on milking UA-cam's copyright system, and UA-cam will continue to let it happen and do absolutely nothing about it.
Only 5 years?🤦🏿♂️He definitely doesn't have regrets
Thanks for the roadmap charlie