Okay. The 3D model is cool, but there is a lot of simple stuff you cant do without paying for a premium membership. like delete your images, make them private and so on. That just better with Midjourney.
flux will not do genitalia AT ALL, and the Loras that add that do it, but not too well, for being so novel. flux will work just fine on a GPU with insufficient ram (and the larger model-size sure shows its capabilities) , where ever the video card driver allows to use mainboard-ram and gpu-vram for cpu-Compute. the modern nvidea driver allows this by default, and also has a disable-this-option.
Friend, is it possible for me to put a ring, necklace or earring on a model? You know, take a photo of the ring on a white background, create a model and put this ring on her finger?
You can make Flux have a negative prompt but it needs a CFG > 1 and it doubles the generation time and it makes it so slow, but if you are willing to wait it can make more realistic-looking images.
I am wondering about 2d to 3d generation. I have old photos from a family member 100 yrs old. I'd like to generate a 3 model so I can 3d print a bust. Will this perform that?
remote services. text2image is quite energy-inefficient on home computers, and much more efficient on larger gpu-server farms. "game as service" MAY just make sense here. Games like ai-rougelike and VersesOfEnchantment exist, where you may not want to wait even 2 seconds per image.
a geforce 1070 i found in my closet from my closet runs flux, and a 1080ti runs it rather well.. let alone people who have anything more recient. i imagine the only people its out of reach from, are people running computers as powerful as chrome books or people who slum it on cell phones.
What do you mean by can run it and rather well? Flux takes 2 min 40 seconds the q4 model for a 1152x896 image on my laptop with rtx 2060. I wouldn’t call that it runs finr. I would call it barely runnable like only run it if you are desperate for a better prompt understanding . In the whole time it takes to generate a flux image I could generate AND upscale an image by 1.5 in sdxl
I don't need the rest but the 3D model feature sounds interesting and the amount of credits for free is decent. Some sites don't give you anything and want a month's pay with no trial.
Do you know if we can make a 3d model out of an image on CGDream? Also thanks for promoting my tortoise riding pommeranian render which I submitted last night. Just barely saw it in your video 😅
@@TheBann90 Please consider that the image-to-3D feature doesn't serve to transform images to 3D models but to convert those models back to 2D images, to change the perspective of an object, to put that element to another background, etc. Although the generated 3D models can imply imperfections, no defects should occur with the final 2D results.
They should really list the NSFW 'sensitive content' is not FREE and list it under the premium tier in their pricing page. Just wasted time trying out the free version for no reason.
I love how a lot of these sites are now calling them prompt refiners. 😂 I've been doing a prompt refiner on my site and for my people for over a year now. I still call it a prompt generator though. Just because it's got a lot more flexibility than just refining your request.
Also for those of you who are questioning why you would pay for flux, some people can't afford the hardware to run it decently. I think sites like this are great for the masses who just need to be able to generate stuff quickly and are willing to front a little dough for it.
you can use it as a prompt generator if you want to. but you can also write a prompt and then have a turn it into a longer, better prompt. I would call that refinement
An entire paid promotion video? I get why you are doing this but I think in the long term this harms the integrity of your otherwise excellent youtube channel.
why? They pay me to do a honest review. I don't lie. I might get things wrong sometimes, but I don't lie. Also this is my first paid video, why most other AI channels constantly do paid videos. Many without even telling you
I disagree. I’m a cloud professional. I’m fine setting up RTX, Mac or cloud machines to make AI images… but I just wanna make images… not stuff around with GPUs and software. I’d happily pay $10 a month to fast track my image creation. Thanks for introducing me… and no, I’m not affiliated with Olivio or CGDream.
@@OlivioSarikas I get frustrated with others who have misleading titles but I have no problem with a paid promotion that's disclosed within the first few seconds of the video. You also have a hashtag that it's an ad. I can understand not wanting to put that right in the main title.
It can also do NSFW images!
#### Link from my Video ####
cgdream.ai/gallery
👋 hi
😂 en enjoy
Looks like a cool site. The 3D model aspect definitely sets it apart from a lot of competitors in the space!
Okay. The 3D model is cool, but there is a lot of simple stuff you cant do without paying for a premium membership. like delete your images, make them private and so on. That just better with Midjourney.
Yeah assume this is less censored too. Definitely going to pause Midjourney sub to try this out for my H JRPG project.
flux will not do genitalia AT ALL, and the Loras that add that do it, but not too well, for being so novel.
flux will work just fine on a GPU with insufficient ram (and the larger model-size sure shows its capabilities) , where ever the video card driver allows to use mainboard-ram and gpu-vram for cpu-Compute. the modern nvidea driver allows this by default, and also has a disable-this-option.
After i learnt Comfy ui i stopped midjourney
@@ollllj don't want genitalia or nudity just big titty anime waifus
Thanks
Friend, is it possible for me to put a ring, necklace or earring on a model? You know, take a photo of the ring on a white background, create a model and put this ring on her finger?
a video about that is coming tonight! :) - well, clothing, but you can try it with that too :)
This looks pretty interesting 🤔
Thank you Olivio!
You can make Flux have a negative prompt but it needs a CFG > 1 and it doubles the generation time and it makes it so slow, but if you are willing to wait it can make more realistic-looking images.
I think i reather refine it with SDXL and save some time ;)
thanks, I will go to test this .. and love FLUX
I am wondering about 2d to 3d generation. I have old photos from a family member 100 yrs old. I'd like to generate a 3 model so I can 3d print a bust. Will this perform that?
Why would you pay to use Flux?
Coz you dont have the hardware?
Still, better off going to vast or runpod if its just flux.
because not everyone has a 4090 to render Flux fast enough and use loras at the same time. So a page like CGDream really helps
remote services.
text2image is quite energy-inefficient on home computers, and much more efficient on larger gpu-server farms. "game as service" MAY just make sense here.
Games like ai-rougelike and VersesOfEnchantment exist, where you may not want to wait even 2 seconds per image.
Also, just ease of use. Not everyone wants to learn all the things.
@@OlivioSarikas using a mac and I can run it. There are many solutions to run flux without a strong gpu.
Your ads are always quality man
XD
3D model feature is nice. Do they have a similar feature like cref or ability to use controlnet for posing a character?
sadly no character posing. but you can pose your own models local and then upload them :)
a geforce 1070 i found in my closet from my closet runs flux, and a 1080ti runs it rather well.. let alone people who have anything more recient. i imagine the only people its out of reach from, are people running computers as powerful as chrome books or people who slum it on cell phones.
I have a 4080 and Flux is super slow for me to be honest. but probably need to fix some stuff
I used to run SD1.5 on a 1080Ti and already considered it very slow. How many minutes does it take you to do an iteration on Flux at 1024x1024?
What do you mean by can run it and rather well? Flux takes 2 min 40 seconds the q4 model for a 1152x896 image on my laptop with rtx 2060. I wouldn’t call that it runs finr. I would call it barely runnable like only run it if you are desperate for a better prompt understanding . In the whole time it takes to generate a flux image I could generate AND upscale an image by 1.5 in sdxl
@@OlivioSarikas Yeah we need the RTX 5090 to come out to run Flux locally I what I consider a reasonable time.
@@jibcot8541 a 5090 and a pod of gold to afford it ;)
Obrigado meu amigo, seu video me ajudou muito a entender como funciona o negative prompt. Deu muito certo. Você é o cara !!!
can you make a video about PicLumen?
Very interesting integration with 3d objects… did I miss if this renders video
I don't need the rest but the 3D model feature sounds interesting and the amount of credits for free is decent. Some sites don't give you anything and want a month's pay with no trial.
not sure if you covered already, but this or ideogram? :D ty
didn't try ideogram yet to be honest
Do you know if we can make a 3d model out of an image on CGDream?
Also thanks for promoting my tortoise riding pommeranian render which I submitted last night. Just barely saw it in your video 😅
they have a 2D to 3D fuction, but it is really bad
@@OlivioSarikas yes, I noticed it and tried it after I wrote this. It seems to be completely useless
@@TheBann90 well, it can help with new images when you set the 3d input to a low value. but they really need to update it
@@TheBann90 Please consider that the image-to-3D feature doesn't serve to transform images to 3D models but to convert those models back to 2D images, to change the perspective of an object, to put that element to another background, etc. Although the generated 3D models can imply imperfections, no defects should occur with the final 2D results.
@@IvanCGDream I usually get some strange 3d mirror in the new images when I use it, and if I rotate beyond a certain point it's just a mess.
They should really list the NSFW 'sensitive content' is not FREE and list it under the premium tier in their pricing page. Just wasted time trying out the free version for no reason.
maybe try some SFW content ;) life isn't just about being horny all the time
@@OlivioSarikas Hope they paid you well you misleading shilltuber
Midjourney restricted artist's inspiration and freedom on creativity.
maybe, but it's also really really good at artistic looking results. It's kind of a "take the good with the bad" situation ;)
I try to use it for free, basicly the queue makes it unusable.
I'd rather use my computer to obtain same result. Sadly.
the servers might be a bit full at the moment, because of the video and the launch of the new features at the same day
@@OlivioSarikas thanks for explanations, i'll try in a few days :)
I understand money is money but the service is terrible. You have to pay even to SEARCH within the Gallery. Like WTH?
I love how a lot of these sites are now calling them prompt refiners. 😂 I've been doing a prompt refiner on my site and for my people for over a year now. I still call it a prompt generator though. Just because it's got a lot more flexibility than just refining your request.
Also for those of you who are questioning why you would pay for flux, some people can't afford the hardware to run it decently. I think sites like this are great for the masses who just need to be able to generate stuff quickly and are willing to front a little dough for it.
you can use it as a prompt generator if you want to. but you can also write a prompt and then have a turn it into a longer, better prompt. I would call that refinement
An entire paid promotion video? I get why you are doing this but I think in the long term this harms the integrity of your otherwise excellent youtube channel.
why? They pay me to do a honest review. I don't lie. I might get things wrong sometimes, but I don't lie. Also this is my first paid video, why most other AI channels constantly do paid videos. Many without even telling you
I disagree. I’m a cloud professional. I’m fine setting up RTX, Mac or cloud machines to make AI images… but I just wanna make images… not stuff around with GPUs and software. I’d happily pay $10 a month to fast track my image creation. Thanks for introducing me… and no, I’m not affiliated with Olivio or CGDream.
@@OlivioSarikas I get frustrated with others who have misleading titles but I have no problem with a paid promotion that's disclosed within the first few seconds of the video. You also have a hashtag that it's an ad. I can understand not wanting to put that right in the main title.
Perfect website 👌👌👌...
The best tool: no matter what the prompt, there's always boobs
Neat.
I wonder - do CGDream have a commercial license, or is this based off of Flux 1.S?
they told me they have a commercial license
@@OlivioSarikas is CGDream using Flux Pro version?
@@artoke84 Flux Dev
@@artoke84 Flux Dev
@@artoke84 Flux Dev
Porche inspired by Kermit😢
Kermit needs a nice car too ;) - also as i said in the video: i used a different 3D model for that image
The bro needs dough. I get it... 😉
blocked for Russians. Well, I didn’t really want to)
use the vpn
Paying to use Flux is awful. You only need a 3070 to run it
tell that to people with no money though ;)
@@OlivioSarikas easily. No different to pc gaming.
@@MillennialKiwiGamer there are also game streaming services. same thing
not for the Pro version of Flux
not everyone is poor bro