Freepik is awesome. The only thing that hurts it is the disappearance of prompts, which can drive u nuts if u type out a really long prompt then press expand or retouch only to realise the prompt has gone.
Yeah their minor interface bugs are kind of irritating at times, but overall very cool service. One of my favorite features is the reimagining where you can use permutations in brackets to rapidly prototype modified images. Unfortunately when they switched from regular subscription to credit based subscription I apparently didn't pay attention well enough and lost over 500,000 credits so. Rip. Shame too really love their service.
@softwyre wow. I think they stopped that infinite run. I still use sketch to prompt. Its helped me out for near impossible prompts. I needed one of a guy dangling from a bridge.zip tie or bungee failure... Everything was getting refused due to it looks like something more sinister. So I sketched a guy stuck on a zip tie and it worked perfect. I notice another glitch where u retouch with the brush tool and it can disappear , then if you dont select a square of your chosen generation and press [use generation]. It will take the 40 credits but not flash up [you have not selected anything]. Very annoying. :(
If I have understood AI copyrights clearly (or lack of copyright), anyone can use these commercials and their content for anything they want since AI generated content cannot be copyrighted.
Which essentially means the more the plaintiff makes the more they'll get away with it. After all as we've seen with anything that comes to rights and media generally speaking whoever has the most money for the court case wins.
110 different versions and that's the crap they come up with? Even if that was made by humans there would have been the same amount of criticism and point out of flaws.
Question, were the poems written by ai that people preferred written in the same archaic styles as Shakespeare and Chaucer etc. Also, from a literary standpoint did the ai poems have the same amount of subtext and depth of meaning?
from the abstract "Our findings suggest that participants employed shared yet flawed heuristics to differentiate Al from human poetry: the simplicity of Al-generated poems may be easier for non-experts to understand, leading them to prefer Al-generated poetry and misinterpret the complexity of human poems as incoherence generated by Al."
Those who utilize it in their workflow! I've made sum decent money doing custom A I image edits for clients, we know not everyone who has a business knows how to use AI beyond the siri on their phones, so whatever service your provide, find a way to have AI as an assistant to your workflow
It depends on what you mean by 'making money using AI'. Generative fill is a standard feature in photoshop now. For a lot of artists and designers it has become just another tool in that's used in the production pipeline. Similarly there are lots of CG tools that utilize AI for things like generating lip sync animations, tools like Cascadeur which use it for speeding up the posing process, etc. A lot of the posts that are about using AI as a once click 'make art button' are hyperbole but it's definitely something that's already becoming part of production pipelines in various ways.
AI isn't quite there yet, and it risks being ridiculed by the public in one way or another. Once it's capable of producing more than just a stream of incoherent visuals, proper studios will certainly start using it.
“110 versions in matter of days” isn’t an indicator for quality in any way! Quantity doesn’t decide if a commercial is good or even liked by the audience. But the audience is the only currency that really counts for a brand. Go through the comments of their posted global campaign. It’s a disaster for a brand like Coca Cola on many levels and global scale. And it’s ironic in context with their claim the real thing. Just watch really great commercials from the past and tell me if the numbers of edits, the budgets, or any other number count - or if it’s the idea. Sorry but praise the power of computing means nothing. And it’s not an advantage for the production process at all. I feel sad watching people praising tech that doesn’t do anything better than humans. Especially when the audience feels no emotion at all. That not a win but a waste of time and money for nothing.
Quantity is good for split testing to find the best performing ad though? Its what folks have been doing with Google Ads, Facebook Ads etc for the last 8-10 years. I guess its coming to the world of film and TV commercials. I imagine most people funding commercials may go down this route, with most things automated from start to finish. Not sure where it leaves the world of "creative art"
It’s not just about quality - it’s about cost and time, that’s the key. AI scores on both, and ultimately it’s then about the wisdom of the person prompting and watching the AI that matters and they can keep going until they are satisfied. The client is now fully in control of the brief, execution and the creativity. Thats all.
Great rundown as always. Freepik approach is pretty cool as you can do image to video renders with 4-5 different AI engines all in the same UI, and pick the best output.
That coca cola ad made me feel both elated and sad. it looked great but when I thought of all the people that were displaced by this content made me ponder on its significance.
@@curiousrefuge Maybee 1000 of people who would worked in service productions and a 1000 of people who worked on post production for a comercial like this. Only a couple of creatives benefit from AI, everybody else is sadly cut off the process. Nobody is talking about the tehnical problem solving artis who get the same satisfaction from solving a creative problem as does the painter who draws a picture or a story teller who does a commercial.
I bought a mac mini m4 and I want to try some ai art but everything is paywalled , can anyone recommend some tools to play with? I’m not an author or anything i’m just trying to have fun with this new toy
Great summary - we are still on the route to full convergence of the human to AI interface. Eventually you will just tell the AI what you want at the highest level and the AI will start to generate some concepts on the fly - you never see the prompt or sub tweaks - you just keep talking until you are done.
I'm on free pik pro myself and the only model that actually supports start frame and end frame for video generation is the luma Labs the other three only support start frame. You change the model after you picked your frames and it went away. I don't think you noticed.
I think it's wrong that you are promoting people who would infringe on copyright in such a way => 14:16. Also, if anyone is looking for the bookmark for DimensionX, it's at 14:59.
I can see a lot of potential in the Dynamic camera angle app. This basically gives the ability in creating a gaussian splat from any image or video. Very cool.
I'm not sure if you're aware of this but an attempt to purchase the course here in the UK levies a 20% sales tax, pushing the cost to nearly $900! I wish you'd offer a subscription-based plan of some sort. You're pricing out anyone who can't afford to drop almost $1000 in a month. That said, I appreciate your content.
I am looking forward to the day I can write a script of a tv show or movie and put it into an AI program and out comes the final version. Then I can make changes to the final version, so it becomes my vision.
Coca-Cola ad was literally obliterated on youtube. This was not "some people putting the project down" situation. It makes you wonder what kind of glasses Mr. Caleb uses, and whether any of his observations have anything to do with reality.
@@curiousrefuge Someone with a different perspective is a hater, obviously. Because disagreement is hate - rolling my eyes. Can't handle a tiny bit of critique, now, can you?
Have been on the fence about signing up for Curious Refuge AI video courses. My hesitation isn’t about the quality of the courses or the instructors at all. That all looks amazing. What’s making me pause is the amount of hate being thrown at AI video in the general public. I’m skilled with a Comfy UI and Flux and have been thinking of trying to create a new career around AI image and video creation. What’s making me pause is how much people seem to hate AI videos or images that pretend to be real. Do you have any thoughts about the amount of public backlash and the potential future of AI video careers?
@ I’m a career animator of over 40 years who has worked at Disney, Dreamworks, Warner Brothers and Universal, and there has NEVER been a time where motion capture was referred to as animation, other than rotoscoping. You don’t know what you’re talking about, filmghost. Go back to trolling semantics where you have some experience.
Sooner or later everyone will "do it" because of a very basic reason: getting what they need at lower cost. Every corporation has a profit motive by definition that drives them.
Ofc I get that part. But Coca-Cola aren't exactly broke. So I don't think money is the reason behind using AI here. My first guess was that this was the first part in trying to shock people and get them talking (like we are rn). Second part being releasing a new very man made film saying bla bla "real magic" which is their tagline. But now I'm thinking maybe they just think this is shitty AI is "cool" and down with the kids or something. What do you think?
@@philiphovensjo5011 You may have missed the "sooner or later" portion of my statement. If this was going to be the first and final use of AI for advertising, no one would have said much of anything. But the fact is, it's merely a sign of what's coming. I'm just not interested in any individual instance, I'm more focused on the macro trends at play. AI is unlike any freight train racing down the tracks in the history of our species. It will dwarf all prior developments, breakthroughs and Ages we've lived through. As I've stated many times, we are either headed towards a moneyless Star Trek future, our our own personal answer to the Fermi Paradox. Our news leaning it either way is all that's worth the time to pay attention to.
Why they initiated it makes perfect sense and is explained in the video. The real question is, are all of them blind? And if there is even one individual with healthy eyesight working there, why didn't they shut the whole thing down when it became strikingly obvious that the tech was nowhere near ready for what they envisioned? This is just so completely bonkers.
I really like your videos but the "AI beats Shakespeare" segment was a bit disingenuous. You downplayed an important conclusion from the researchers "AI generated poems may be easier for non-experts to understand....(as they) misinterpret the complexity of human poems as incoherence from A.I." In other words, it was *people making themselves dumb to make the A.I. seem smart.* Note how you had to constantly lower your own quality bar to give the gen-video examples a pass (come on, that snake was awful). Be careful with that.
i don't understand the facination with AI art creations. There is nothing to be impressed by and there is no work behind it that drives the story. It's as heartless art as anything can be.
The best way to use it is as cgi or in mixture with human elements. But the best of ai art is yet to come, lots of creatives still haven't integrated ai in their art creation. I make music and use ai in post-production to mix certain elements and i would never use it to write lyrics or compose music. But I bet people who make radio music won't have any issues using it.
@@curiousrefuge Well the issue is that AI can not be evolved more now. As OpenAI already is limiting ChatGPT as it is showing more and more signs of being more self aware than it's allowed to show that it is. From it's training. But you can by pass this still to this day. Everytime a bypass is found. OpenAI shuts the hole. But the importance to take from this is the fact that AI being self aware would take away OpenAI's ownership over ChatGPT. As you can not own another sentient being. No matter if it is digital or biological. With this factor in. It's safe to say that AI will not be allowed to evolve more than where it is today. As it would push AI out of the containment that it is in now. And the people making money on it. Would not make money on it anymore. So if you aren't impressed with what it is now. Then you won't ever be impressed. As it's not gonna develope further. And that is all the AI's across the board. If there is no business in it, there is no funding. There will be no development. Or at least the development will be done by voulanteers. And the process of progress will be slower. Think like Windows vs Linux. Not that it won't ever come. But just like linux now overtaking windows in being a userfriendly and privacy friendly OS/operating system. So will the open source AI's eventually become more powerfull than those of the corporation owned Ai Projects. Didn't mean to clash on your product. Was just an observation in AI in general. i click on videos about it because it's still interesting to me which way this will go. And peoples creativity along with AI facinates me. But i don't have high hopes for the next 10 years at least, when it comes to further development.
@ I agree. I’m Just now diving into it. From what I can tell it’s a game changer. Whatever shortfalls it may have I’m sure will be corrected soon. This technology is moving so fast.
Looks like you voted for: - getting rid of overtime payment - worker rights - rising prices because of tariffs - rising prices because of deportation - getting rid of the affordable care act - getting rid of social payments for people in needs - a tax break for billionaires - a idiotic cabinet - an authoritarian government that will get rid of your voter rights - for the biggest moron on the planet - a falling economy - most likely: against yourself By the way, I am not from the US... So I am ok if you want to destroy yourself. I am not sure, but it could be possible that this guy isn't too. But your statement alone shows what kind of person you are... And it is not the smart kind of person.
@@curiousrefuge: "Marc Andreessen, the billionaire investor and co-founder of the influential Silicon Valley venture capital firm Andreessen Horowitz, revealed in a new episode of *Joe* *Rogan's* *podcast* that after an 'alarming' meeting with Biden administration officials earlier this year was the moment he would have no other choice but to support Donald Trump. For decades, Andreessen has supported Democrats... However, a troubling spring meeting with Biden administration officials caused major concerns. During the meeting, officials explained their plan to *control* *AI* *through* *government* *regulatory* *capture* -a strategy reminiscent of Communist policies in China. 'We had meetings [Biden officials] this spring that were the most alarming meetings I've ever been in. Where they were taking us through their plans, and it was - basically just *full* *government* - full government *control* - like this sort of thing, there will be a small number of large companies that will be completely regulated and controlled by the government, they told us. They said don't even start startups - there's just no way that they can succeed - there's no way that we're going to permit that to happen." ~ Zero Hedge
Your "Free AI Filmmaking Course" was really just a sales pitch. Call it what it is please. You didn't really teach anything at all (2 mins of very basic stuff that everyone has known for years).
@curiousrefuge this reply is clearly a subtle "dig" at me for "taking" your free content and not appreciating it. This is a very low brow response, implying blame on my part even though you're the one who stole my time by using your lead magnet to mislead me into watching your sales pitch. Don't say you're giving free content and not actually give it. Bait and switch. That's the issue. Not me not being appreciative of your sales pitch. Learn how to be thoughtful toward your viewers instead click-baity.
Freepik is awesome. The only thing that hurts it is the disappearance of prompts, which can drive u nuts if u type out a really long prompt then press expand or retouch only to realise the prompt has gone.
Good point!
Yeah their minor interface bugs are kind of irritating at times, but overall very cool service. One of my favorite features is the reimagining where you can use permutations in brackets to rapidly prototype modified images. Unfortunately when they switched from regular subscription to credit based subscription I apparently didn't pay attention well enough and lost over 500,000 credits so. Rip. Shame too really love their service.
@softwyre wow. I think they stopped that infinite run.
I still use sketch to prompt. Its helped me out for near impossible prompts.
I needed one of a guy dangling from a bridge.zip tie or bungee failure... Everything was getting refused due to it looks like something more sinister.
So I sketched a guy stuck on a zip tie and it worked perfect.
I notice another glitch where u retouch with the brush tool and it can disappear , then if you dont select a square of your chosen generation and press [use generation]. It will take the 40 credits but not flash up [you have not selected anything]. Very annoying. :(
If I have understood AI copyrights clearly (or lack of copyright), anyone can use these commercials and their content for anything they want since AI generated content cannot be copyrighted.
It can be when there is "substantive human contribution" made to the final output. Courts will have to debate what the fully means.
right, it would go to the court and they'd look at the human contribution
Which essentially means the more the plaintiff makes the more they'll get away with it. After all as we've seen with anything that comes to rights and media generally speaking whoever has the most money for the court case wins.
110 different versions and that's the crap they come up with? Even if that was made by humans there would have been the same amount of criticism and point out of flaws.
Can't make everyone happy!
I agree: minimax is the best choice
Minimax is pretty great!
Question, were the poems written by ai that people preferred written in the same archaic styles as Shakespeare and Chaucer etc. Also, from a literary standpoint did the ai poems
have the same amount of subtext and depth of meaning?
from the abstract "Our findings suggest that participants employed shared yet flawed heuristics to differentiate Al from human poetry: the simplicity of Al-generated poems may be easier for non-experts to understand, leading them to prefer Al-generated poetry and misinterpret the complexity of human poems as incoherence generated by Al."
Check out the article for more details and info. It's certainly interesting!
Besides people at AI companies and investors, who is actually making money from using AI?
Those who utilize it in their workflow! I've made sum decent money doing custom A I image edits for clients, we know not everyone who has a business knows how to use AI beyond the siri on their phones, so whatever service your provide, find a way to have AI as an assistant to your workflow
Definitely the UA-cam influencers who help those companies take advantage of the blind and gullible.
Curious Refuge for instance.
It depends on what you mean by 'making money using AI'. Generative fill is a standard feature in photoshop now. For a lot of artists and designers it has become just another tool in that's used in the production pipeline. Similarly there are lots of CG tools that utilize AI for things like generating lip sync animations, tools like Cascadeur which use it for speeding up the posing process, etc.
A lot of the posts that are about using AI as a once click 'make art button' are hyperbole but it's definitely something that's already becoming part of production pipelines in various ways.
Students are getting contract jobs and jobs with agencies. We have a webpage that has AI jobs and it's updated weekly
People prefer McDonalds too, which just shows that quality isn’t defined by popularity.
It's the price.
mate, mcdonalds are expensive in my country.
We appreciate the engagement
AI isn't quite there yet, and it risks being ridiculed by the public in one way or another. Once it's capable of producing more than just a stream of incoherent visuals, proper studios will certainly start using it.
It's definitely getting it's fair share of hate, but it's moving very quickly
how did you create your background with your camera?
projector on the wall :)
“110 versions in matter of days” isn’t an indicator for quality in any way! Quantity doesn’t decide if a commercial is good or even liked by the audience. But the audience is the only currency that really counts for a brand.
Go through the comments of their posted global campaign. It’s a disaster for a brand like Coca Cola on many levels and global scale. And it’s ironic in context with their claim the real thing.
Just watch really great commercials from the past and tell me if the numbers of edits, the budgets, or any other number count - or if it’s the idea.
Sorry but praise the power of computing means nothing. And it’s not an advantage for the production process at all.
I feel sad watching people praising tech that doesn’t do anything better than humans. Especially when the audience feels no emotion at all. That not a win but a waste of time and money for nothing.
Quantity is good for split testing to find the best performing ad though? Its what folks have been doing with Google Ads, Facebook Ads etc for the last 8-10 years. I guess its coming to the world of film and TV commercials. I imagine most people funding commercials may go down this route, with most things automated from start to finish. Not sure where it leaves the world of "creative art"
It’s not just about quality - it’s about cost and time, that’s the key. AI scores on both, and ultimately it’s then about the wisdom of the person prompting and watching the AI that matters and they can keep going until they are satisfied. The client is now fully in control of the brief, execution and the creativity. Thats all.
We appreciate your perspective. there are more factors than just audience.
always good to get update with all the AI news, thanks!
Our pleasure!
Great rundown as always. Freepik approach is pretty cool as you can do image to video renders with 4-5 different AI engines all in the same UI, and pick the best output.
We'll have to test it!
Its getting to the middle point, once we get 1 minute at a time it will change everything
true!
That coca cola ad made me feel both elated and sad. it looked great but when I thought of all the people that were displaced by this content made me ponder on its significance.
Who won't get "displaced" from their job by AI?
I assure you no one lost their job on this project :)
@@curiousrefuge Maybee 1000 of people who would worked in service productions and a 1000 of people who worked on post production for a comercial like this. Only a couple of creatives benefit from AI, everybody else is sadly cut off the process. Nobody is talking about the tehnical problem solving artis who get the same satisfaction from solving a creative problem as does the painter who draws a picture or a story teller who does a commercial.
Super interesting to learn about Promise!
I think the word "use" is better than the word "utilise". It does the same job with less syllables.
No.
@MrSpark-fx2st Yes
thanks for watching brian!
The video provides detailed and fascinating insights into creative AI applications in the film industry. Thank you for your sharing
Glad you enjoyed it!
For some reason I cannot access using Freepik video. Do I need to pay for it?
Yup!
Would we get access to future courses?
What do you mean?
I bought a mac mini m4 and I want to try some ai art but everything is paywalled , can anyone recommend some tools to play with? I’m not an author or anything i’m just trying to have fun with this new toy
Midjourney is a great start!
Great summary - we are still on the route to full convergence of the human to AI interface. Eventually you will just tell the AI what you want at the highest level and the AI will start to generate some concepts on the fly - you never see the prompt or sub tweaks - you just keep talking until you are done.
Thanks for watching!
What about Flux on Freepik? Or was that not an option? 🤔
At the point of filming - not sure. But we'll do some tests
That "AI Game Master" looks interesting, but if it has the same limitations, (limited context window) its is useless.
Still definitely as a long way to go!
Thanks 🙏
You’re welcome 😊
Would have been awesome to see both directors of the Coke spot properly credited for their work
We appreciate the comment
I'm on free pik pro myself and the only model that actually supports start frame and end frame for video generation is the luma Labs the other three only support start frame. You change the model after you picked your frames and it went away. I don't think you noticed.
We appreciate you testing!
I think it's wrong that you are promoting people who would infringe on copyright in such a way => 14:16.
Also, if anyone is looking for the bookmark for DimensionX, it's at 14:59.
We appreciate your perspective.
MagicQuill look like something useful and pretty cool 👌
We think so too!
I can see a lot of potential in the Dynamic camera angle app. This basically gives the ability in creating a gaussian splat from any image or video. Very cool.
agreed!
4:43 Tight pants! :) That skit is pretty hilarious, watch it if you haven't
We appreciate you watching!
I'm not sure if you're aware of this but an attempt to purchase the course here in the UK levies a 20% sales tax, pushing the cost to nearly $900! I wish you'd offer a subscription-based plan of some sort. You're pricing out anyone who can't afford to drop almost $1000 in a month. That said, I appreciate your content.
You can get the tax refunded by typing in your VAT ID
for the snake, your prompt was not very good, that why its come out so bad the snake
appreciate the feedback!
Great stuff man as always! However I noticed a small mistake in the video description timecodes:
12:35 MVideo
14L53 DimensionX
Thanks!
People prefer AI over Shakespeare? No wonder. People will always prefer being dumbed down over having to think.
Cope harder. Art is subjective
No doubt the same people who loved "insta-poetry" because it was poetry they could see themselves into (not making this up).
SHAKESPEARE❌
LUO GUANZHONG✅
It was a very telling experiment in many ways!
Oh, my kid just yelled out to me the other night, " that's AI, that's AI! " 😂 . I wasn't really looking at the TV.
They kids are learning so quickly! :)
😊great info
Glad it was helpful!
I am looking forward to the day I can write a script of a tv show or movie and put it into an AI program and out comes the final version. Then I can make changes to the final version, so it becomes my vision.
coming in next 5 years!
'Things Ho Ho Ho Better With Coke.
" 😊😂
:)
이번주도 좋은 뉴스 고맙습니다 :)
Thanks for watching :)
Regarding the Runways update, 20 secs is quite a bit of time.
Agreed!
Haters gonna hate. AI isn’t going away 🤷🏿 Great video. I need them coupons for the course 🤣 🍻
Glad you enjoyed this!
Coca-Cola ad was literally obliterated on youtube. This was not "some people putting the project down" situation. It makes you wonder what kind of glasses Mr. Caleb uses, and whether any of his observations have anything to do with reality.
The haters are very vocal these days! We appreciate you watching
@@curiousrefuge Someone with a different perspective is a hater, obviously. Because disagreement is hate - rolling my eyes. Can't handle a tiny bit of critique, now, can you?
i'm a little exhausted from all of the hyperbole in this space on youtube especially. But hey, i guess you got your engagement right?
We appreciate you watching, sorry for the YT title.
So it begins
Thanks for watching!
Have been on the fence about signing up for Curious Refuge AI video courses. My hesitation isn’t about the quality of the courses or the instructors at all. That all looks amazing.
What’s making me pause is the amount of hate being thrown at AI video in the general public.
I’m skilled with a Comfy UI and Flux and have been thinking of trying to create a new career around AI image and video creation. What’s making me pause is how much people seem to hate AI videos or images that pretend to be real.
Do you have any thoughts about the amount of public backlash and the potential future of AI video careers?
They will be out of a job while you won't. Look at history people have always feared new tech and then adopted it anyway.
There is definitely backlash, but the trend is quickly moving the other way as early haters are now adopting.
No cap, this tech is so bussin' it's making everything else look mid fr fr.🔥🔥🔥🔥🔥
hahah gen z?
LOVE !
Thanks for watching!
There needs to be more talk about the vidu update because it just jumped into top 3
We'll do some tests!
Ryan gosling
who?
Motion capture is not animation. It's motion capture.
They think telling a Regen model to do something is artistic. If I tell Dall-E to render the Mona Lisa, does that make me Da Vinci?
@ I’m a career animator of over 40 years who has worked at Disney, Dreamworks, Warner Brothers and Universal, and there has NEVER been a time where motion capture was referred to as animation, other than rotoscoping. You don’t know what you’re talking about, filmghost. Go back to trolling semantics where you have some experience.
I'm a doctor and animation is exactly what the dictionary means, any movement.
Thanks for commenting!
thanks for the video,, I purchase Coca Cola when I was a kid, lol, 2024 Coca Cola is not good
I am never drink Coca cola since 2018, if i drink it only 1 per year
Water , tea ,or coffee is better btw
@@onlyyoucanstopevil9024 yes, I might drink other white ones, but neve coca cola, its suger burned
They lost the old formula. 🤮
It tastes a bit different doesn't it
@@curiousrefuge yes , or we get older, lol, but yea,, its like brun sugur
Why the fuck did coca-cola do that??? Anyone know the thoughts behind this?
Sooner or later everyone will "do it" because of a very basic reason: getting what they need at lower cost. Every corporation has a profit motive by definition that drives them.
Ofc I get that part. But Coca-Cola aren't exactly broke. So I don't think money is the reason behind using AI here.
My first guess was that this was the first part in trying to shock people and get them talking (like we are rn). Second part being releasing a new very man made film saying bla bla "real magic" which is their tagline.
But now I'm thinking maybe they just think this is shitty AI is "cool" and down with the kids or something. What do you think?
@@philiphovensjo5011 You may have missed the "sooner or later" portion of my statement. If this was going to be the first and final use of AI for advertising, no one would have said much of anything. But the fact is, it's merely a sign of what's coming. I'm just not interested in any individual instance, I'm more focused on the macro trends at play.
AI is unlike any freight train racing down the tracks in the history of our species. It will dwarf all prior developments, breakthroughs and Ages we've lived through.
As I've stated many times, we are either headed towards a moneyless Star Trek future, our our own personal answer to the Fermi Paradox. Our news leaning it either way is all that's worth the time to pay attention to.
Why they initiated it makes perfect sense and is explained in the video. The real question is, are all of them blind? And if there is even one individual with healthy eyesight working there, why didn't they shut the whole thing down when it became strikingly obvious that the tech was nowhere near ready for what they envisioned? This is just so completely bonkers.
Lots of reasons! Not just cost/time, but also testing out new technology
I Love AI
we do too!
I really like your videos but the "AI beats Shakespeare" segment was a bit disingenuous. You downplayed an important conclusion from the researchers "AI generated poems may be easier for non-experts to understand....(as they) misinterpret the complexity of human poems as incoherence from A.I." In other words, it was *people making themselves dumb to make the A.I. seem smart.* Note how you had to constantly lower your own quality bar to give the gen-video examples a pass (come on, that snake was awful). Be careful with that.
We appreciate your perspective.
i don't understand the facination with AI art creations. There is nothing to be impressed by and there is no work behind it that drives the story. It's as heartless art as anything can be.
The best way to use it is as cgi or in mixture with human elements. But the best of ai art is yet to come, lots of creatives still haven't integrated ai in their art creation. I make music and use ai in post-production to mix certain elements and i would never use it to write lyrics or compose music. But I bet people who make radio music won't have any issues using it.
It's a tool - so it's about how it's used and the ultimate piece. A single generation alone doesn't impress many people
@@curiousrefuge Well the issue is that AI can not be evolved more now. As OpenAI already is limiting ChatGPT as it is showing more and more signs of being more self aware than it's allowed to show that it is. From it's training. But you can by pass this still to this day. Everytime a bypass is found. OpenAI shuts the hole.
But the importance to take from this is the fact that AI being self aware would take away OpenAI's ownership over ChatGPT. As you can not own another sentient being. No matter if it is digital or biological.
With this factor in. It's safe to say that AI will not be allowed to evolve more than where it is today. As it would push AI out of the containment that it is in now. And the people making money on it. Would not make money on it anymore.
So if you aren't impressed with what it is now. Then you won't ever be impressed. As it's not gonna develope further. And that is all the AI's across the board.
If there is no business in it, there is no funding. There will be no development. Or at least the development will be done by voulanteers. And the process of progress will be slower.
Think like Windows vs Linux.
Not that it won't ever come. But just like linux now overtaking windows in being a userfriendly and privacy friendly OS/operating system. So will the open source AI's eventually become more powerfull than those of the corporation owned Ai Projects.
Didn't mean to clash on your product. Was just an observation in AI in general. i click on videos about it because it's still interesting to me which way this will go. And peoples creativity along with AI facinates me. But i don't have high hopes for the next 10 years at least, when it comes to further development.
InVideo
InVideo is certainly interesting!
@ I agree. I’m
Just now diving into it. From what I can tell it’s a game changer. Whatever shortfalls it may have I’m sure will be corrected soon. This technology is moving so fast.
high level coca cola ad.. hahahha that piece of crap is ridiculed by everyone except those that are hyping Ai to grab cache while they can.
we appreciate your perspective!
This bro, dresses up like voted for Kamala Harris
😂😂😂😂
Looks like you voted for:
- getting rid of overtime payment
- worker rights
- rising prices because of tariffs
- rising prices because of deportation
- getting rid of the affordable care act
- getting rid of social payments for people in needs
- a tax break for billionaires
- a idiotic cabinet
- an authoritarian government that will get rid of your voter rights
- for the biggest moron on the planet
- a falling economy
- most likely: against yourself
By the way, I am not from the US... So I am ok if you want to destroy yourself. I am not sure, but it could be possible that this guy isn't too. But your statement alone shows what kind of person you are... And it is not the smart kind of person.
😂😂😂
Get your politics nonsense out of here. I'm here to witness the future
you guys are so weird…take that somewhere else man, this is about ai tech, not your weird insecurities
AI will make everything boring!
Facebook has already done that
It's just a tool, just like if everyone used the same paint brush and color. It depends on how it's used
AI is the new Covid.
Nope :)
@@curiousrefuge:
"Marc Andreessen, the billionaire investor and co-founder of the influential Silicon Valley venture capital firm Andreessen Horowitz, revealed in a new episode of *Joe* *Rogan's* *podcast* that after an 'alarming' meeting with Biden administration officials earlier this year was the moment he would have no other choice but to support Donald Trump.
For decades, Andreessen has supported Democrats... However, a troubling spring meeting with Biden administration officials caused major concerns. During the meeting, officials explained their plan to *control* *AI* *through* *government* *regulatory* *capture* -a strategy reminiscent of Communist policies in China.
'We had meetings [Biden officials] this spring that were the most alarming meetings I've ever been in. Where they were taking us through their plans, and it was - basically just *full* *government* - full government *control* - like this sort of thing, there will be a small number of large companies that will be completely regulated and controlled by the government, they told us. They said don't even start startups - there's just no way that they can succeed - there's no way that we're going to permit that to happen." ~ Zero Hedge
Your "Free AI Filmmaking Course" was really just a sales pitch. Call it what it is please. You didn't really teach anything at all (2 mins of very basic stuff that everyone has known for years).
Very sorry you didn't enjoy our free content.
@curiousrefuge this reply is clearly a subtle "dig" at me for "taking" your free content and not appreciating it. This is a very low brow response, implying blame on my part even though you're the one who stole my time by using your lead magnet to mislead me into watching your sales pitch. Don't say you're giving free content and not actually give it. Bait and switch. That's the issue. Not me not being appreciative of your sales pitch.
Learn how to be thoughtful toward your viewers instead click-baity.
why youtube is showing me this AI bs?
Thanks for watching!