The Soviet army is represented in the game... It's very strange. These are infantry uniforms, which are massively wearing "Butane" camouflage, which, like the bulletproof vests of anti-tank fighters with machine gunners, were intended ONLY for special forces. Airborne soldiers wear ceremonial berets. Not real insignia on the equipment (at least I do not know such). The developers clearly took materials not from the Red Army but from the Armed Forces of the Russian Federation of the 90s. And remembering the comment on the last video, the soldiers of the Soviet army disliked the AK-74 VERY much, so much so that the units changed them to the AKM series at the first opportunity. Also, the MI-24D presented in the game was rarely used in advanced units at the time of 89, it would be more logical to see the MI-24V. And yes, I'm sorry for the grammar, English is not my native language
@@guy-be-man6908Oh, it seems that there are regular problems with the Russian translation of the WiC text, we wrote that this is a modification of the V, and the BMP-2 was called the BTR-RD "Robot"
You missed in the Ekranoplane-Scene: The missiles ar AShM, not Land Attack Missiles Also one mistake wich always bothers me: The amphibious transport for NATO is a Spz Luchs. The Luchs is a Recon tank, it has no capability to carry infantery internally (sure, they could sit on top of it, but I don't think, that they would do it). ALso, I am currently not sure if it is the Luchs A1 or A2. If it is the A2, it shouldn't be considered amphibious
Ahhh, you are correct about the Luchs, and the Ekranoplan, but it does seem that the Luchs variant seen in game maybe the A1, so it should be amphibious.
2;38: Actually Helicopters are used by ALAT (Aviation Légère de l'Armée de Terre), which is a branch of Land Army (Armée de Terre), not Air Force. Still a great job, congrats!
With regards to the Warrior armor upgrade package, I can kind of see militaries rushing kit that IRL was deployed in 1990-91 onto the Battlefield in the Summer or Autumn of 1989 if there is a Third World War raging, that's somewhat understandable. Also I think in Guards Tank divisions, at least the ones outfitted with T-80s the mobilized units slated to reinforce them were equipped with T-62s. We see that in the Divisions in WARNO, so T-80s and T-62s in the same unit makes a degree of sense. Though I think in the original alpha build they had a T-72 model that was supposed to be the medium tank in game. The abundance of T-80Us is likely because it was the most advanced design the Soviets had at the time that they had actually produced en masse so they prioritized new builds of the T-80U rather than the T-80Bs or BVs when the war started (or converted older T-80s up to the T-80U standard), so the older models slowly became extinct in the German meat grinder while T-80Us became more numerous as they were the model available as replacements. It's similar to what we see in Ukraine with T-90Ms, where we see losses of them almost every other day while T-90As are as rare as white rhinos as most have been upgraded to the T-90M standard and T-90Ms are the only new build tanks Russia currently produces, though there are rumors of T-80 production restarting at OmskTransMash, hopefully we get a T-80UM2 obr. 2025, that'd be sweet.
Yeah from what I have seen in the extremely early trailers, the T-72 was the medium tank. I think it would have been nice for the T-80 models to randomly change between the Bs and Us.
![WORLD IN CONFLICT - UNIT HISTORICAL INACCURACIES 1989 - PART 3 FINALE [BONUS]](http://i.ytimg.com/vi/XgXr8G-7XNs/mqdefault.jpg)
![WORLD IN CONFLICT - UNIT HISTORICAL INACCURACIES 1989 - PART 3 FINALE [BONUS]](/img/tr.png)
"Fewer Ekranoplans should be seen"
*More* Ekranoplan should always be seen, is my position
NATO goes…😦
1:30 The Missouri firing off rounds that quickly is mechanically impossible. In real life, each 16 inch Mark 7 cannon averaged 2 rounds per minute.
I’m gonna put that in the description. If you are ok with it
@@guy-be-man6908 Of course. And why would someone complain about it being put in the descriptiom?
@justderp5713 Heads up
The Soviet army is represented in the game... It's very strange. These are infantry uniforms, which are massively wearing "Butane" camouflage, which, like the bulletproof vests of anti-tank fighters with machine gunners, were intended ONLY for special forces. Airborne soldiers wear ceremonial berets. Not real insignia on the equipment (at least I do not know such). The developers clearly took materials not from the Red Army but from the Armed Forces of the Russian Federation of the 90s. And remembering the comment on the last video, the soldiers of the Soviet army disliked the AK-74 VERY much, so much so that the units changed them to the AKM series at the first opportunity. Also, the MI-24D presented in the game was rarely used in advanced units at the time of 89, it would be more logical to see the MI-24V. And yes, I'm sorry for the grammar, English is not my native language
Yeah the Soviets in game do look pretty weird in terms of their appearances. But seriously though your English is actually really really good!
@@guy-be-man6908Seriously? Thank you :)
I also did want to inform you that the game does say the MI-24 in game is the V variant. So that’s a plus.
@@guy-be-man6908Oh, it seems that there are regular problems with the Russian translation of the WiC text, we wrote that this is a modification of the V, and the BMP-2 was called the BTR-RD "Robot"
Interesting
Awesome videos
@@TonyBustaroniThank you!
This game was my childhood
You missed in the Ekranoplane-Scene: The missiles ar AShM, not Land Attack Missiles
Also one mistake wich always bothers me: The amphibious transport for NATO is a Spz Luchs. The Luchs is a Recon tank, it has no capability to carry infantery internally (sure, they could sit on top of it, but I don't think, that they would do it). ALso, I am currently not sure if it is the Luchs A1 or A2. If it is the A2, it shouldn't be considered amphibious
Ahhh, you are correct about the Luchs, and the Ekranoplan, but it does seem that the Luchs variant seen in game maybe the A1, so it should be amphibious.
2;38: Actually Helicopters are used by ALAT (Aviation Légère de l'Armée de Terre), which is a branch of Land Army (Armée de Terre), not Air Force. Still a great job, congrats!
Ahh, thanks for the heads up. Thanks for liking it as well!
@@guy-be-man6908 You're welcome my friend ;).
With regards to the Warrior armor upgrade package, I can kind of see militaries rushing kit that IRL was deployed in 1990-91 onto the Battlefield in the Summer or Autumn of 1989 if there is a Third World War raging, that's somewhat understandable.
Also I think in Guards Tank divisions, at least the ones outfitted with T-80s the mobilized units slated to reinforce them were equipped with T-62s. We see that in the Divisions in WARNO, so T-80s and T-62s in the same unit makes a degree of sense. Though I think in the original alpha build they had a T-72 model that was supposed to be the medium tank in game.
The abundance of T-80Us is likely because it was the most advanced design the Soviets had at the time that they had actually produced en masse so they prioritized new builds of the T-80U rather than the T-80Bs or BVs when the war started (or converted older T-80s up to the T-80U standard), so the older models slowly became extinct in the German meat grinder while T-80Us became more numerous as they were the model available as replacements. It's similar to what we see in Ukraine with T-90Ms, where we see losses of them almost every other day while T-90As are as rare as white rhinos as most have been upgraded to the T-90M standard and T-90Ms are the only new build tanks Russia currently produces, though there are rumors of T-80 production restarting at OmskTransMash, hopefully we get a T-80UM2 obr. 2025, that'd be sweet.
Yeah from what I have seen in the extremely early trailers, the T-72 was the medium tank. I think it would have been nice for the T-80 models to randomly change between the Bs and Us.
On the soviet forces, in a early trailer there is a bmp 3. Im guessing it was cut for the more iconic bmp 2 (plus its armament)
Ahh yes, the NATO trailer in particular.
@@guy-be-man6908 yup thats the one.