I Bought A $1300 ADVENT Calendar?! *it's literally TERRIBLE*

Поділитися
Вставка
  • Опубліковано 21 лис 2024

КОМЕНТАРІ • 3,1 тис.

  • @xena91388
    @xena91388 11 місяців тому +6595

    This would have been sooo much better if it had just been ornaments in an icon object from each major movie: Snow White's apple, Cinderella's slipper, Aladdin's Lamp, etc ending with the Mickey ornament.

    • @ddraigmafon4725
      @ddraigmafon4725 11 місяців тому +125

      Yes, great idea! 👏👏👏

    • @FriendOfMara
      @FriendOfMara 11 місяців тому +275

      Literally! The ornaments you can buy at the Christmas shops at Disney are waaay better in design and I am sure similar designs could have been made in crystal. Like a little crystal tinkerbell, maybe the castle, full 3D mickey, minnie, and friends ornaments instead of cheaply printing them on the back of a 2D one.

    • @lauraann7816
      @lauraann7816 11 місяців тому +221

      I said what crystal company representing Disney doesn't make a glass slipper? Disney is so much more than Mickey Mouse. I like you suggestion of the apple and lamp as well. The lady I watched unbox this a couple weeks ago got a refund.

    • @melanie990
      @melanie990 11 місяців тому +34

      I'm broke AF but I'd definitely buy what you're describing!!!!!

    • @kellieevetts2637
      @kellieevetts2637 11 місяців тому +3

      Yes!!

  • @kingtut6243
    @kingtut6243 11 місяців тому +6625

    the fact that they had 100 YEARS of iconography from their films to choose from and decided to stick almost exclusively to mickey and minnie mouse themed things is actually insane to me

    • @Z.A.M.1359
      @Z.A.M.1359 11 місяців тому +383

      They've been going hard on Mickey and Minnie items lately, even before the anniversary kicked off. It's had me all worked up cause I want Donald Duck items, and his 90th anniversary is coming up, but it seems like they will barely do anything for that. They act like Mickey and Minie are the only characters people know and want. They've been struggling with promoting their own works since before the pandemic even started.

    • @Magical_Trash
      @Magical_Trash 11 місяців тому +143

      Another huge L for modern Disney. Unsurprising 😔

    • @Goleon
      @Goleon 11 місяців тому +64

      @@Magical_Trash- Disney didn’t make this. Blame the company that bought the rights to use the Disney stuff and decided to be cheap asses on it.

    • @vegandolls
      @vegandolls 11 місяців тому +97

      ikr!! mickey /minnie are my least favorite. I actually hate them. I was expecting princesses and villains. One mickey is more than enough

    • @twistedoldloony
      @twistedoldloony 11 місяців тому +52

      @@Z.A.M.1359 Personally I’ve never really cared for Mickey but I LOVE Donald Duck with a passion!!

  • @keanan2603
    @keanan2603 10 місяців тому +1994

    For those confused as to why one of the ornaments is already broken, at 9:28 you can see the star drop on it, breaking the ear

    • @Simipourfangirl
      @Simipourfangirl 10 місяців тому +147

      That's what I was thinking

    • @TheStepmonkey
      @TheStepmonkey 10 місяців тому +340

      True and then she was like "I was very delicate with them" 💀

    • @BhappyD
      @BhappyD 10 місяців тому +783

      ⁠@@TheStepmonkeyIn all fairness, there is no reason why an ornament this expensive should have ever been able to break so easily like that. It was clear from the appearance of the break that the ears were not secured properly to the center disc. This is way beyond just some fragile ornaments not being handled with care, this was 100% atrociously shameful and faulty craftsmanship in every possible way. What an embarrassment of a product. I hope the majority of people who bought this calendar got a refund.

    • @maomi1852
      @maomi1852 10 місяців тому +224

      Yeah but it shouldn't break that easily....

    • @elleg3651
      @elleg3651 10 місяців тому +133

      Shouldn't break that easily.

  • @SuperRaedizzle
    @SuperRaedizzle 11 місяців тому +7007

    1500 dollars for STICKERS and MISPRINTED ITEMS??? 😫 girl, they’re out of their minds selling that!

    • @None_ofurbussiness
      @None_ofurbussiness 11 місяців тому +20

      Love ur vids btw!!

    • @angeljustforyoulol
      @angeljustforyoulol 11 місяців тому +23

      crazyyyy fr

    • @lethfuil
      @lethfuil 11 місяців тому +91

      Maybe the misprints are especially valuable collectors items. You know, like with coins. xD

    • @ashleymaisonet4424
      @ashleymaisonet4424 11 місяців тому

      they better hope, otherwise they're gonna have more returns then they know what to do with.@@lethfuil

    • @PrissyGaming
      @PrissyGaming 11 місяців тому +17

      ©Disney though 😂

  • @PupCake1025
    @PupCake1025 11 місяців тому +2050

    This should NOT have been this difficult. The moment you opened day 7 I was expecting a Snow White themed ornament. A glass slipper is painfully obvious for this set, a red rose would fit the Christmas colors, the Frozen snowflakes you mentioned, the Genie’s lamp, a little steamboat to really highlight the 100 years theme… so many Disney characters/movies have reached a cultural point where they can be represented by a single image, this set had absolutely no business including a single ornament that didn’t have a direct connection to the brand.

    • @spacey7289
      @spacey7289 10 місяців тому +49

      They should hire you.. lol Id buy your box over this.

    • @pippadawg7037
      @pippadawg7037 10 місяців тому +24

      They should hire you! Those are great ideas. Imagine the poison apple for Snow White- apples are red too. Still I think it would make a good cooperate gift to someone who either collects Disney or is somehow affiliated with Disney. But I would rather have your calendar.

    • @carmen3091
      @carmen3091 10 місяців тому +3

      I love your ideas! This would've been the best!

    • @Abbyyena
      @Abbyyena 10 місяців тому +5

      Love your ideas. They missed the mark and have the audacity to charge that much!

    • @EmerialynCodeVenice
      @EmerialynCodeVenice 10 місяців тому +1

      Absolutely!!!!!!

  • @moonlmoon
    @moonlmoon 10 місяців тому +942

    I went to jewelry school, and learned pretty quickly in gemmology, that Swarovski crystal is pretty much just fancy glass with a coating to make it extra sparkly and give it that rainbow shine. The coating will wear off if you handle it too much, and then you're left with dull looking glass. After school, I started working at a jeweler who sold Swarovski jewelry, and it was a nightmare. We sold lots of pretty things, but my heart would fall when customers would walk to the Swarovski window and point to anything there. Even though Swarovski jewelry *looks* silver, it's actually all copper with a silver or gold coating. So when you see a 268 euro necklace, you're not even buying a silver or gold necklace for that price. The silver or gold coating will wear off, and you will eventually be left with a copper colored necklace with dull stones. Its basically overpriced bijoux jewelry.
    We'd get SO MANY returns! When I had to advertise it, I would silently hint that these pieces of jewelry were more for a fancy dinner, or for a prom night, but of course we'd have lots of customers who'd buy them for everyday wear. Woman who'd wear them and then spray perfume all over on them, or rings! The rings were SUPER sensitive to scratching as well! We had one woman who made a huge scratch on a ring by simply opening a door! It was hard to sell Swarovski jewelry. On one hand, they were a nice hit on the bank whenever we sold one, and they sold like hotcakes during christmas, but on the other hand I wanted to break out of my saleswoman act, and direct the customer to the much cheaper and better in quality silver items we had. Only time I did was when a guy wanted to propose with a Swarovski ring...😮‍💨

    • @gildedpeahen876
      @gildedpeahen876 2 місяці тому +74

      yes i used to sell jewelry too
      my instant reaction was, this is glass and those necklaces aren't even sterling much less gold.
      branding only

    • @dutchik5107
      @dutchik5107 11 днів тому +39

      wait? like i knew it was glass, but i assumed the silver was y know, silver.

    • @_fussyfangs
      @_fussyfangs 7 днів тому +10

      I thought the brand had Rhodium covered silver jewelry which explained the price point 😅
      I also used to gravitate towards the sparkly stuff in jewelry, but when the crystals lose their shine it was just sad... I prefer Moissanite now, just like diamonds but a lot more affordable. Also sapphire and garnets.

    • @moonlmoon
      @moonlmoon 7 днів тому +26

      ​@@_fussyfangsSwarovski jewelry isnt stamped, so its sadly not even silver. I do get why ppl think that with its price though. Moissanite is nice, and better than diamonds. More shiny and not sourced through unethical means ❤ But personally, I think ppl are too obsessed with diamonds, there are much cooler gemstones out there. My favorite is rubelite and tourmaline ✨️🥺

    • @moonlmoon
      @moonlmoon 7 днів тому

      ​@@dutchik5107no, it isnt stamped...

  • @lenlaegrim
    @lenlaegrim 11 місяців тому +1450

    Just noticed this, but the little door sizes are SO misleading. You get all excited thinking you're gonna open a bigger door so surely it's gonna be something cool/special, and then you see a huge blank wall of foam with a little cubby and most of the contents are ornaments that are all kind of the same size and in the exciting variety of: 1 of 4 different shapes?? That's wild

    • @24get24give
      @24get24give 7 місяців тому +16

      no, that's Disney magic

    • @alankiitty
      @alankiitty 3 місяці тому

      @@24get24giveoverconsumption, my favorite kind of magic !!

    • @gildahondier8533
      @gildahondier8533 2 місяці тому +1

      😂😂😂

    • @Acidfrog475
      @Acidfrog475 2 місяці тому +2

      It’s such a waste of materials, too! I can excuse the small ornaments _to a point,_ but not that (and the awful printing and lock mechanisms).

    • @jack-a-lopium
      @jack-a-lopium 3 години тому

      Have you ever bought jewellery? I'd assume the boxes are larger than the item inside... I mean, that's just basic physics...

  • @KeyushTheStuntDog
    @KeyushTheStuntDog 11 місяців тому +6093

    Swarovski is glass cut to look like diamonds, but it is just glass with a high price tag because of the brand. Pretty, but not actual crystal or gemstones in any way. It's synthetic. Such a shame they didn't make the whole calendar like the final ornament, they would have had a lot of happy customers if they had.

    • @forgboi420
      @forgboi420 11 місяців тому +281

      Thanks!
      P.S. I think it’s actually made of crystal glass.

    • @EmilyCheetham
      @EmilyCheetham 11 місяців тому +488

      It’s actually crystal glass rather than regular glass but ye it’s not real diamonds.

    • @kristalburns3490
      @kristalburns3490 11 місяців тому +35

      @@EmilyCheetham What is the difference?

    • @EmilyCheetham
      @EmilyCheetham 11 місяців тому +377

      @@kristalburns3490 crystal class has 24% or higher of lead and other minerals added to it. It is much stronger than regular glass. Also specifically Swarovski is made using quarts sand (whatever that is- I’m not an expert).

    • @Tonyaisquirky
      @Tonyaisquirky 11 місяців тому +75

      I had no idea!! I have been using Swarovski beads thinking they were crystal... I am so disappointed! I looked it up after reading your comment. Wow.. Thank you for letting us know!! :)

  • @HarryCopperPot
    @HarryCopperPot 11 місяців тому +478

    For that price every single ornament should have been a Disney character carved like day 25's Mickey.

    • @jack-a-lopium
      @jack-a-lopium 2 години тому

      Maybe, just maybe, Day 25 cost MORE than the average... and they made up by raising the average of every other door?
      Do you know how averages work? I mean, I guess this UA-camr doesn't so you probably don't know either.

  • @sheylamoon
    @sheylamoon 11 місяців тому +3273

    if i paid 1300 for a disney calendar and all i got was like 10 variants of mickeys head id lose my shit lmao

    • @cherriemater
      @cherriemater 11 місяців тому +11

      👍💙😂🤣😅🙂🙃🙂😊

    • @titheproven954
      @titheproven954 11 місяців тому +172

      I didn't even pay 1300 for it and I AM losing my shit here.

    • @Bluetangg
      @Bluetangg 11 місяців тому +23

      I’d be disappointed and return it.

    • @_Yuki.v.
      @_Yuki.v. 4 місяці тому +13

      At 1,300 dollars I better have a customized Mickey phone 😃

    • @tovah2276
      @tovah2276 2 місяці тому +8

      $1300…..better come with a ticket TO DISNEYLAND

  • @sarahisquiethere
    @sarahisquiethere 11 місяців тому +2156

    With all the love in my heart: those ornaments are mostly ugly and don't feel like they were created with love and care.
    They're preying on people's Disney Nostalgia.

    • @yuzu-tsuyu
      @yuzu-tsuyu 11 місяців тому +204

      And not just ugly, but insanely *cheap* looking--if you showed me those ones with print on the back I would've honestly guessed it was a freebie gift-with-purchase, there's no way those cost them more than $1/ea to manufacture.

    • @fallencyano9015
      @fallencyano9015 11 місяців тому +63

      yeah, it looks like something id find at the arcade or the flea market/swap meet, cheaply made out of plastic... it does not look like anything worth ~$54 each

    • @cathygrandstaff1957
      @cathygrandstaff1957 11 місяців тому +39

      They’re a good reflection of current year Disney then.

    • @Lilian040210
      @Lilian040210 11 місяців тому

      Anything Brand™ or fashion or beauty is a scam, how are the bitches (I can't say people, people aren't this fucking stupid or obsessed with dominance\status\ego\etc this much) still eating it up so willingly

    • @rattiegirl5
      @rattiegirl5 11 місяців тому +6

      I prefer Disney pins and standard Disney ornaments.

  • @SethKotta
    @SethKotta 11 місяців тому +417

    "Alright, we got Mickey, Minnie, Donald, and Daisy. I think that's all the Disney characters!"
    "What about Goofy? Or Pluto?"
    "Never heard of them."
    "Huh? Okay... Well, we could also include Donald's nephews, or Pete. Hell, why not do Scrooge McDuck? He's based on Ebenezer Scrooge from A Christmas Carol. It doesn't get much more Christmas and Disney than that."
    "Ted, I need you to stop making shit up."

    • @bealea1127
      @bealea1127 2 місяці тому +5

      Lol! 😆

    • @jack-a-lopium
      @jack-a-lopium 3 години тому

      Who are you quoting? Yourself? It must be difficult having such a low IQ.

  • @monicaniblett9651
    @monicaniblett9651 11 місяців тому +1157

    I've worked at a company that licensed Disney artwork - I promise most of these decisions were made and approved by Disney more than the creative team at Sworovski.

    • @redfulla1494
      @redfulla1494 11 місяців тому +197

      this. people really out her slamming Swarovski, as if Disney doesn't do this stuff with any other brand they can slap an image on. It's starting to get kind of gross that people keep paying for this crap, have some self respect y'all.

    • @maryeckel9682
      @maryeckel9682 11 місяців тому +31

      I believe you. They're so controlling.

    • @luckyxxxxk
      @luckyxxxxk 11 місяців тому +42

      Disney is really going downhill

    • @miss1of2
      @miss1of2 11 місяців тому +42

      Are you talking about the design or the quality of crafting?? Cause I have Disney themed Pandora beads on my bracelet and they are REALLY well made in sterling silver.
      But I have a Swarovski ring, that is not themed and it is just as poorly made as those ornaments seemed to be... Cheap rose gold plated metal with the crystals glued on it instead of being set... Had to exchange it on warranty cause I lost most of the crystals within a month...

    • @monicaniblett9651
      @monicaniblett9651 11 місяців тому

      Most likely creative decisions by Disney, manufacturing by the other companies (with some Disney approval process)@@miss1of2

  • @rockpaperskizzers
    @rockpaperskizzers 11 місяців тому +1312

    I think the printed ornaments would have read as a lot more classy if they had laser etched the design instead. Then the designs would be sure to last and they'd look much more upscale.

    • @bamagirlce12
      @bamagirlce12 11 місяців тому +30

      Or be printed on both sides

    • @indesomniac
      @indesomniac 11 місяців тому +89

      Or if it was a double-sided print either with crystal on both sides to make it a round ornament. Everything looks so cheap 😅

    • @DoritoBot9000
      @DoritoBot9000 11 місяців тому +9

      Then it would have been way more expensive than just slapping a print on the back of a chunk of glass, but I agree it would have been beautiful

    • @Lilian040210
      @Lilian040210 11 місяців тому

      Why? The dumb veg will buy anything with a brand name on it anyway

    • @whogivesashirtdotca
      @whogivesashirtdotca 10 місяців тому +6

      With laser cutters that would probably have been cheaper to make, too!

  • @Charity_never_Faileth
    @Charity_never_Faileth 11 місяців тому +205

    I would never buy this, but rewinding you dropping that diamond chunk Crystal, it fell right onto Mickey's ear, so THAT broke it ... I also imagine if I DID buy this, it would go into a lighted cabinet, with a closed glass door, on a very small display "tree", as most do when they buy glass Disney figurines, they go into a "display case". The bad backings, bad clasps, things falling so easily off of the string, very valid points.

    • @dustinroberson1865
      @dustinroberson1865 6 днів тому +3

      I was expecting more display pieces, less ornaments. When you go to disney, all you see is the swarovski display pieces.

    • @CodecrafterArtemis
      @CodecrafterArtemis 2 дні тому +3

      In retrospect, maybe including basically literal caltrops in the set was not such a good idea.

    • @SteampunkHorse
      @SteampunkHorse День тому

      @@CodecrafterArtemis😂😂

  • @MsLinaTina
    @MsLinaTina 11 місяців тому +820

    Surprised no one has commented on the "gift" ornament. It's just a rectangle of glass with a bit of metal around it. No facets, no bow, it doesn't sparkle. It deserves some hate too.

    • @BIP64
      @BIP64 11 місяців тому +65

      **silently hating the "gift" ornament**

    • @Lilian040210
      @Lilian040210 11 місяців тому +34

      I'm not making it that far. This is beyond ridiculous. Maybe a lot of other people didn't either

    • @psychedelikchameleon
      @psychedelikchameleon 10 місяців тому +12

      Share the hate among all of them 😂

    • @dralbora
      @dralbora 10 місяців тому +36

      I saw it more as a Bible/cross than a gift/ribbon.

    • @snakewithapen5489
      @snakewithapen5489 10 місяців тому +11

      It has a little red bow on top but it's not a 'gift' style bow

  • @AbeM.
    @AbeM. 11 місяців тому +605

    The snowflake, which is honestly probably the prettiest thing in this box, is last year’s design and it can be found (relatively) for cheap online right now

    • @Z.A.M.1359
      @Z.A.M.1359 11 місяців тому +47

      From my experience reselling Swarovski jewelry and statues, I don't even have to check to know those ornaments and necklaces will have abysmal resale value in the future. Very few look like they'd have any actual collector value as Disney or Swarovski.

    • @msk-qp6fn
      @msk-qp6fn 11 місяців тому +16

      ​@@Z.A.M.1359 correct me if I am wrong but as someone who often went window shopping for swarvoski's products in the early 2000s, I think their quality has declined drastically since mid 2010s and now the designs are generally really bland too

    • @Z.A.M.1359
      @Z.A.M.1359 11 місяців тому +6

      @msk-qp6fn I agree. It's that or they have a handful of really nice items surrounded by highly mass-produced, lower quality pieces.

    • @redfulla1494
      @redfulla1494 11 місяців тому +10

      @@Z.A.M.1359 I find the statement pieces are still very exciting. especially some of the more sculptural abstracts. However, I find that the design output as a whole has shifted towards minimalist, and not in a timeless or fun way.
      I hadn't thought about it until you mentioned it, but I never realised I stopped caring about resale value. I think I subconsciously identified that there was none, awhile back.

    • @jack-a-lopium
      @jack-a-lopium 2 години тому

      @@msk-qp6fn And that's why you voted for Trump?

  • @tuber33
    @tuber33 11 місяців тому +545

    Did anyone else notice that the entire shade of this is Disney's "go away green?" It's the shade they paint stuff in the park they don't want you to notice. For $1,300 to basically be told secretly to go away is interesting in and of itself. Also number five appears to be a hidden Mickey. Look at the outline of the frost and then you can see two eyes and a nose and then the facets are along the face line.

    • @snakewithapen5489
      @snakewithapen5489 10 місяців тому +107

      It's not quite the right shade, go away green paint is more dull olive, but it is funny that they made this whole calendar green since that is a well-known color of theirs lol

    • @claudiamiller7730
      @claudiamiller7730 10 місяців тому +18

      Agreed - I also saw the vague outline of the Mickey silhouette on the frosted ornament….

    • @musical_costumer7976
      @musical_costumer7976 4 дні тому +5

      Go away green is lighter, but it is similar tone-wise. Go away green is a tap closer to the blue/cool tones than the red/warm tone green. The box is also a blue-toned green.

    • @madampawsy1903
      @madampawsy1903 День тому

      It’s not go away green

    • @jack-a-lopium
      @jack-a-lopium 2 години тому

      @@madampawsy1903 But any shade of green is apparently 'go away green', so the commenter can make their point accurately. He's doing something called... lying.

  • @jenniferm6042
    @jenniferm6042 11 місяців тому +741

    You could have flown to Innsbruck, booked a hotel, and visited their Swarovski Kristallwelten museum for less than that calendar. Ticket entry wasn't cheap but the food was really good.

  • @triciac.5078
    @triciac.5078 11 місяців тому +2422

    $1300 and they included stickers. Stickers. I don’t care if they had crystals on them. They’re stickers.

    • @rtd1791
      @rtd1791 11 місяців тому +86

      The stickers were my favorite. Not worth the price, but they were the only item that had any razz-ma-tazz .

    • @triciac.5078
      @triciac.5078 11 місяців тому +30

      @@rtd1791 very true! Hadn’t thought about that. Might be worth it to hit up Michael’s for some small plain glass ornaments and use the stickers. Then you’ll have sparkles on your tree.

    • @canadianjaneoriginal
      @canadianjaneoriginal 11 місяців тому +21

      At least if it was a crystallized leather wallet, or compact at least, one of their fancy characters posed on a stand. SOMETHING SUBSTANTIAL for $1300.

    • @z-beeblebrox
      @z-beeblebrox 11 місяців тому +21

      What is it with advent calendars and stickers anyway??

    • @missjuliarenee
      @missjuliarenee 11 місяців тому +10

      There were stickers in the Chanel one too! 😅

  • @dawggyd9779
    @dawggyd9779 10 місяців тому +146

    Horrendous 😭 disney is out their minds. They cant even pay their animators/artists/writers a decent wage and ask this much for some glass in a box....smh

    • @jack-a-lopium
      @jack-a-lopium 2 години тому

      Pretty sure Disney employees are well taken care of... where did you get that idea from? That's not something Disney is known for... Disney is known for working it's employees very hard, not for very low amounts.

  • @casstwentytwo
    @casstwentytwo 11 місяців тому +613

    My main thought the whole time was "wow this is SO LAZY". If only the advent calendar contained 25 ornaments of the same quality as day 25 was, and every ornament was actually Disney themed and there was variety (not just micky and minnie 25 times etc), it could've been amazing.

    • @JustGettinBy1321
      @JustGettinBy1321 11 місяців тому +40

      Not sure about Swarovski, but the Disney company as a whole has been doing MOST things the lazy way with little regard to customer value, IP integrity, etc. It's a shame since they were the exact opposite for so long & are capable of so much more.

    • @ka_gaertner
      @ka_gaertner 11 місяців тому +4

      well said, that's everything I was thinking the whole time!

    • @casstwentytwo
      @casstwentytwo 11 місяців тому +3

      @@JustGettinBy1321 I agree, it really is a shame because I know they can do so much better

    • @christinatucker4902
      @christinatucker4902 11 місяців тому

      Completely agree. My thoughts exactly.

    • @sadiemcintire1054
      @sadiemcintire1054 10 місяців тому

      THIS!!!

  • @meaganhartman4304
    @meaganhartman4304 11 місяців тому +708

    If I'm paying anything more than $30 for an advent calendar, it better give me the Christmas Spirits of past, present, and future. $1300 is insane! The moment I see stickers in anything that costs that much, I would return it. That is such a slap in the face. The only item in the box that was worth it was the final Mickey ornament. They should have made all of the ornaments a different Disney Character and skipped the stupid printed ones altogether.

    • @hasenbommel
      @hasenbommel 11 місяців тому +13

      I think what most people don't realize ist that with 30$ you have roundabout 1$ per item and still need to pull off the calender itself (and packaging like that is super expensive to produce) and then you still haven't made any profit. Yes, 1300$ is way too much but with 30$ you're not getting anywhere near your desired Christmas Spirits. Can't expect more than cheap chocolates and stickers within that budget ;)

    • @amandahealey2216
      @amandahealey2216 11 місяців тому +35

      @@hasenbommel I think the point she was trying to make was that people are going to expect a higher amount of quality for $1,300

    • @micaelaferreira8337
      @micaelaferreira8337 11 місяців тому +13

      Lego advent calendars are over $30 but at least you repair a Lego ornament if you brake it 😁

    • @NicoleS-lx4cf
      @NicoleS-lx4cf 11 місяців тому +1

      Yep, a missed opportunity by Disney

    • @polarboy5862
      @polarboy5862 11 місяців тому

      While what you say while good in theory it is basically impossible. As was pointed out in the video a small Disney Swarovski ornament would easily sell for $90 so lets say you get a bit of a bulk discount and get 25 character ornaments for $75 each that brings the total up to $1875. Another point to consider is things like this are basically promotion pieces most Swarovski stores would only get one or two of these and they would be part of the window display to draw in holiday shoppers who might buy a small Disney ornament (including blue frozen snowflakes which they have had a version of in permanent stock for quite a few years now). They actually sell very few of these sort of things, and the vast bulk are sold to rich Chinese ladies, China has been Swarovski's biggest high end market for years.

  • @briancherry8088
    @briancherry8088 11 місяців тому +60

    9:40 - we just watched you drop the big one on that ear.

    • @desereeculley6846
      @desereeculley6846 2 місяці тому +15

      Yep. She broke it by dropping the pokey ornament on the green mickey, granted I agree they should be a better quality but then again, its crystal...not diamond

  • @cheshirewolf1574
    @cheshirewolf1574 11 місяців тому +975

    Honestly HOW THE HELL does a MOVIE company celebrate their 100 year anniversary and the only thing in their gift box is their icon mascot?! WHO DESIGNED THIS?

    • @squidfeathers9704
      @squidfeathers9704 10 місяців тому

      Someone who is about to lose the copyright, so you flood the market and devalue it; I mean Mickey is no longer important for the health of disney now that they've got Pixar, Fox, Marvel, star wars, etc. Disney is about to lose the exclusive right, so might as well sell out before its public domain.

    • @ToGiveLifeMeaning
      @ToGiveLifeMeaning 10 місяців тому +39

      When said company is selling out everything it stands for and is making as many cash grabs as possible from their shrinking fan base before they completely squander their relevance to society.

    • @Keahilovestheater
      @Keahilovestheater 3 місяці тому +18

      Yea I was expecting like Disney princesses and iconic characters not just micky

    • @HeatherWho11.10
      @HeatherWho11.10 3 місяці тому +2

      It was 100 years of Mickey. Makes sense that it's mickey items

    • @virginiaviola5097
      @virginiaviola5097 2 місяці тому

      Bob Iger.

  • @jeancrochets
    @jeancrochets 11 місяців тому +1255

    I used to go to school with people who were also studying to be jewellers, goldsmiths, and silversmiths (I did clockwork) and whenever I hear the name Swarovski I remember one of the students telling me that Swarovski is the same quality as normal cubic zirconia and you're just paying for the name. This calendar is 100% a ripoff, though. This is not Disney. They do so many Disney products there is no excuse for them to not have the entire calendar be Disney. The stickers are also such a letdown. I hope you can get your money back.

    • @LisaMarieFord
      @LisaMarieFord 11 місяців тому +23

      Hmm, depends on who makes the cubic zirconia. Like so many things, the quality is in who makes, how it is made, and how cheaply. I’ve seen some good and some ruddy awful.

    • @caitlinwhatthefrick2361
      @caitlinwhatthefrick2361 11 місяців тому +17

      @@LisaMarieFordone broke right away and all the other things wrong with them

    • @LisaMarieFord
      @LisaMarieFord 11 місяців тому +9

      @@caitlinwhatthefrick2361 Cubic Zirconia? There wasn’t any in this set. That’s what the original commenter was talking about and I replied about, not the Swarovski crystal glass in this set. They’re not the same thing.

    • @rat-gang-
      @rat-gang- 11 місяців тому +56

      swarovski isn't even crystal, it's crystal glass. it's almost entirely paying for the name at this point when there's so many equally priced alternatives

    • @caitlinwhatthefrick2361
      @caitlinwhatthefrick2361 11 місяців тому +18

      @@LisaMarieFord yes, they are both just glass. They even took the lead out of the glass so it’s literally just plain glass which is the same as CZ. (I used to also work at a jewelry store)

  • @allwomn1
    @allwomn1 11 місяців тому +94

    The green mickey with broken ear, only broke when you dropped the star on it. Glass against glass breaks easily, go back and watch where it lands when you drop it.

    • @ItsMuffinTimePls
      @ItsMuffinTimePls 2 місяці тому +27

      While that is true, the way the ear was hanging like that instead of breaking clean off shows that they just glued that instead of fusing the glass... which is just soooo cheap

    • @missyannp36
      @missyannp36 Місяць тому +3

      Literally a close up of her dropping it and landing on the ear. Disney is a rip off and shady, but I don't feel bad for someone that wants to waste that kind of money on a bunch of crystals that they didn't even pick out themselves.

  • @Larissa-eo3pt
    @Larissa-eo3pt 11 місяців тому +413

    I have yet to see a single advent calendar anywhere from any brand that isn't an obvious collection of things they couldn't sell individually. And the overall value is never anywhere near the sticker price. The packaging is always very attractive. That's where they put all of the thought, into the packaging that gets people to shell out for it.

    • @grayhatjen5924
      @grayhatjen5924 11 місяців тому +27

      @Larissa-eo3pt All of the ridiculously expensive ones I'm seeing this year are embarrassing. If a company is gonna charge that kind of money, the items shouldn't only be of the highest quality. They should only be available in the calendar.
      I have seen some calendars over the years that aren't available any other way. I'm not positive if it's still this way, but Funko usually has items unique only to their calendars. Sure they often have characters the have created full size before, but they're always unique poses etc.
      I think Disney has so much money they've stopped caring.

    • @Fiona2254
      @Fiona2254 11 місяців тому +12

      Exactly! They are all rubbish, expensive rubbish.

    • @helgacucumber3871
      @helgacucumber3871 11 місяців тому +31

      I get the Bonne Maman Advent Calendar every year and I will vouch for it. It's tiny jars of Bonne Maman jam and they're exclusive flavors they don't sell at other times of year (at least not in grocery stores). The jams are great and the mini jars are glass so it feels like you're getting something quality. The labels use water-soluble adhesive so they slip right off in water which makes the jars really re-usable. I use mine for seed storage. Oh, and it's only $45. It feels like the more expensive an advent calendar is, the shittier it is.

    • @xCr00k3Dx
      @xCr00k3Dx 11 місяців тому +9

      I have a Nightmare Before Christmas Advent calendar where it's all paper craft ornaments with a pop-up tree to put the ornaments on.
      Worth the price? Probably not. But the tree is nice for my small apartment, it has interesting artwork, and everything feels like it's been part of a homogeneous set made for this product so far 🙂

    • @jbaby362
      @jbaby362 10 місяців тому

      ​@@helgacucumber3871I was gonna vouch for them too, those advents are great

  • @julieklaassen1058
    @julieklaassen1058 11 місяців тому +515

    I would have expected so many more characters! Being Disney 100, I would have expected more than just Mickey characters...

    • @ErisV_
      @ErisV_ 11 місяців тому +22

      I'm sure the "mouse shape" was the only copyright they could/ wanted to buy for this

    • @lenlaegrim
      @lenlaegrim 11 місяців тому +35

      @@ErisV_ yeah, Disney has their own ornaments in their shop, so they probably didn't wanna give up too many character licenses for this purpose to another company or would only do it for an exorbitant price tag. It's a shame, since most of what they offer look to be cast and painted figurine-like ornaments, and this collab had great potential to include some cool stuff like Cinderella's glass slipper, Olaf, Snow White's apple, the Heart of TeFiti, or more character figures like the final Mickey one.

  • @theproplady
    @theproplady 9 місяців тому +19

    The reason it's filled with circular crystals with printed pictures of Mickey on them is because Swarovski has a line of nicer Disney themed ornaments that look like iconic characters and objects, and those are 200-400 dollars apiece on average. Filling an advent calendar full of those would've cost around 5000-10,000 dollars. I've seen nice, genuine crystal animal figurines made by other companies that were about 100 dollars apiece, and I think Disney could've probably put together a decent character Advent set for about 2500 dollars at that price point. They probably still would have had loads of people buying them with few complaints, and it wouldn't have looked like they were trying to rip people off.

  • @laureendavis2369
    @laureendavis2369 11 місяців тому +134

    I used to sell Swarovski. The items where they join round crystals together like the Mickey heads are notorious for falling apart and there is no way you can fix it. If you can find a glue that works, it eventually becomes discolored and shows through. Swarovski has made some beautiful holiday snowflake ornaments but they were much more ornate and substantial than those flimsy flakes. Those star ornaments look just like their hanging prisms you could buy for $20. I know things have gone up a lot and tagging the Disney name to it helps add to the cost but this is ridiculous. I bought a pair of blue crystal waterlily candle holders the size of baseballs for $200. Much more worth it when you see the hundreds of cuts on the waterlilies.

  • @Randomcommenter29
    @Randomcommenter29 11 місяців тому +186

    I have a Bluey book advent calendar. I get 24 different mini books. So far after seeing what’s in other advent calendars, I feel like I made the right choice.

    • @megwyn1611
      @megwyn1611 11 місяців тому +16

      We got my kiddo a $30 Gabbys Dollhouse one. The gifts are all stickers and 3D printed characters and sleds/cupcakes. I'm exceptionally happy with our choice

    • @BIP64
      @BIP64 11 місяців тому +11

      I've got a cheap advent calendar containing 24 pieces of cheap chocolate. I feel I made the right choice. 😀

  • @xxsydneypopytxx
    @xxsydneypopytxx 3 дні тому +18

    9:31 I mean you did break it because you dropped the star on it, but yeah it shouldn't break that easily

  • @MissDaniLove
    @MissDaniLove 11 місяців тому +1318

    This one is already broken... it wasn't me I didn't drop this one. Go back 10 seconds to her dropping the heaviest one on the fragile glass ear. 😅

    • @hawkeyescoffee6399
      @hawkeyescoffee6399 11 місяців тому +220

      I'm glad someone else said it, I was about to comment the same thing.

    • @verda7019
      @verda7019 11 місяців тому +177

      I was thinking the same thing.
      You can actually see the ear break when she dropped the other ornament onto it.

    • @sarahbrandt501
      @sarahbrandt501 11 місяців тому +137

      I was going to say this. You see the heavy point drop right into it's ear. Very possible she didn't notice that it did. But from what I seen, it was definitely her being a little clumsy, as she says, tossing the ornament around.

    • @KrisWilliams81
      @KrisWilliams81 11 місяців тому +49

      Noticed that and was laughing 😂

    • @diva8717
      @diva8717 11 місяців тому +48

      I was just about to comment the same thing, you can literally see the ear break off when she dropped the star ornament on it.

  • @candypopdrop
    @candypopdrop 11 місяців тому +2146

    I like how we watched her break the Mickey then 10 seconds later she found it and didn’t realize it was her 😂😭

    • @AyaBlue22
      @AyaBlue22 11 місяців тому +300

      9:26 - whooooops. Y'could even hear the lil' crunch. >_

    • @sammansfield21
      @sammansfield21 11 місяців тому +451

      Still shouldn't break that easily

    • @mummasmith7010
      @mummasmith7010 11 місяців тому +230

      Came here looking for this comment as well! Literally watched her break it 😂

    • @tessyatl
      @tessyatl 11 місяців тому +203

      @@mummasmith7010Me too! Ear is fine until she drops the diamond shaped rock on it & it broke right there

    • @pinkdarkman
      @pinkdarkman 11 місяців тому +145

      People on Amazon reviews when they claim the product came destroyed.

  • @JinxyBoo72
    @JinxyBoo72 19 днів тому +19

    8:43 I believe the strange circle ornament is one of their ‘hidden Mickey’ designs! If you put together the three center dots and the white/frosted pattern at the top it kind of looks like the top of his head! (If you squint.) It might just be me but I see it kind of.

  • @BrunetteAngel-14
    @BrunetteAngel-14 11 місяців тому +1620

    “The Marilyn Monroe dress, you know the one Kim Kardashian ruined with her butt” I couldn’t stop laughing 😂

    • @horizon319
      @horizon319 11 місяців тому

      Though to be honest, her butt has ruined a lot of things! 😂

    • @cherriemater
      @cherriemater 11 місяців тому +4

      😂

    • @annatully6394
      @annatully6394 11 місяців тому +68

      I think she cut on it, & had it badly altered too. That's why designers were so upset. It was one of 2 made & she destroyed it. Smh. Ahh the ideas of someone famous for being famous. I mean "leaking" a sex tape to gain notoriety..? It worked I guess.

    • @Izzy-cp8yt
      @Izzy-cp8yt 11 місяців тому +104

      ​@@annatully6394 as far as I knew, she didn't have it altered (because it's technically an artifact), but just attempting to put it on she ruined it because it was custom made for Marilyn, who was quite petite. But besides irreparably ruining it, it was the sheer entitlement and disrespect to Marilyn's memory and legacy. Call me a hater if you will, but Marilyn had 100x the talent Kim K has. That dress was meant to be hers and hers alone, and Kim just steamrolled over everything because she wanted attention, and she can't get it unless she makes a scene.

    • @zaraheart
      @zaraheart 11 місяців тому +21

      @@Izzy-cp8ytAgreed 1000%. If you get hate then the haters are psycho for being a Kardashian “fan” lol

  • @melsterifficmama1808
    @melsterifficmama1808 11 місяців тому +310

    Disney has so many characters, there's no excuse for not making the entire set Disney character themed.

  • @elbdot
    @elbdot 11 місяців тому +29

    When you started opening the calendar, I was actually expecting this calendar to be FULL of ornaments like the last one at 22:40 just like you said yourself, like WTF??? If it says DISNEY Calendar, you kinda expect it to be full of merch of classic Disney properties, like I was expecting something like a Simba or Bambi ornament, not just MICKEY and MINNIE 90% of the time, then I would've called it a MICKEY Calendar... what a wasted opportunity tbh, not only that but a complete RIPOFF with misprinted items and freaking STICKERs, GEEZ...

  • @kitsorcerer
    @kitsorcerer 11 місяців тому +86

    Ok seriously stickers? Like if I spent 1300 on an advent calendar from a crystal maker, every single door better have a friggin crystal!

  • @MissAprilNinja
    @MissAprilNinja 11 місяців тому +9

    “Swore-off-ski” also they have made these in the years past and I’ve seen several videos that are similar to yours. Unhappy and lots of broken pieces. 😢 Thank you for sharing 😊

  • @EmilyCheetham
    @EmilyCheetham 11 місяців тому +260

    Cherry Wallace also bought the same advent calendar. She was really annoyed and disappointed and returned it & got a full refund. It seems Swarovski did a poor job their advent calendar(s).

    • @Bonnie_Mairead
      @Bonnie_Mairead 11 місяців тому +20

      Yeah, I watched her too! I was wondering if Chloe would get it too. Seems it's terrible quality all around for everyone.

    • @LoveableNiki
      @LoveableNiki 11 днів тому

      I had no idea you could return advent calendars. I figured once you open it, that was it.

    • @EmilyCheetham
      @EmilyCheetham 11 днів тому

      @ I think it all depends on the company you get it from, how you open it etc. if it is one where doors are wrapped open ye you cannot return it. But if it is one with draws then you can probably return it as how are they going to know?

  • @AlcheonArt
    @AlcheonArt 11 місяців тому +163

    Another Disney product is a scam? What a shocker :D

  • @JomasterTheSecond
    @JomasterTheSecond 11 місяців тому +34

    It's almost like the biggest companies make the worst things!

  • @abc.6223
    @abc.6223 11 місяців тому +106

    omg honestly though this is the 100 year anniversary calendar!! From an overpriced jewelry and knick knacks brand, I can't believe they didn't make every day of the calendar based on the actual other major disney movies in order of release? To celebrate 100 years? Why is it just mickey's head 90% of the time and then the two ducks? Not even Goofy, you couldn't even round out the mickey mouse main cast? I've seen their other glass sculptures, I know they can make glass in the shape of fullbody characters, they practically specialize in miniatures. If I were Disney I would have been mad this is what they came up with lol

    • @ankavoskuilen1725
      @ankavoskuilen1725 10 місяців тому +6

      Maybe Disney came up with it. Wouldn't surprise me a bit.

  • @wyrdy1572
    @wyrdy1572 11 днів тому +6

    If they wanted to recycle I agree they could of done a blue snowflake, a red rose for bell, a GLASS SLIPPER, a frog, an apple.
    I like figurines and my aunt collects these…this is what I came up with as someone who doesn’t even watch Disney.

  • @Elfdaughter
    @Elfdaughter 11 місяців тому +128

    FYI, the Swarovski crystals in the ruby slippers were in the bows - not the shoe itself, that was just sequins.

  • @amandah2490
    @amandah2490 11 місяців тому +144

    Drops the star on the green Mickey and says, "it was already broken. It was not me". 😅😅😅

    • @bec9696
      @bec9696 9 місяців тому +3

      I can imagine her walking into the shop, asking the staff to watch her video as proof it wasn't her😂

    • @TheHerring7
      @TheHerring7 9 місяців тому +2

      Right, so it's not broken through most of the video, but it still was somehow 'already broken', just because the shot of it breaking was inserted at the beginning, dropping a star item that hadn't even been opened at that time..? Ooo-kaaay..

  • @TJJewett
    @TJJewett 11 місяців тому +10

    CRA: drops clunky crystal onto dainty crystal. examines dainty crystal - it's broken. It wasn't me!

  • @Draca151
    @Draca151 11 місяців тому +184

    It feels like they slid the decimal on the price. It should have been $130.00. I still wouldn't pay that much for this advent calendar, because it was very disappointing and doesn't appeal to me, but it would be at least worth that price. I'd give it a 2.5 out of 10. Its giving me flashbacks to dime store misprints I had to put up with when i was a child.

    • @LoyaFrostwind
      @LoyaFrostwind 11 місяців тому +1

      I’m not surprised at the price tag. Leotards with Swarovski crystals “bling” for gymnasts and figure skaters can run into the thousands of dollars.

    • @caitlinwhatthefrick2361
      @caitlinwhatthefrick2361 11 місяців тому +4

      @@LoyaFrostwind so overpriced just for some lil pieces of glass

  • @jolynnaerobert3190
    @jolynnaerobert3190 11 місяців тому +106

    I bought a $130 wine advent calendar this year from "In Good Taste" and I love it. I don't like all the wines, but most of them are passable. The experience was worth it. $1300 for cheap looking Disney tiny ornaments and stickers?? nope!

  • @piapedersen
    @piapedersen 11 днів тому +6

    The only reason they get away with shit like this is because people are willing to pay stupid money for it.

  • @22kaybee22
    @22kaybee22 11 місяців тому +69

    Me, who's favourite store is Dollarama, enjoying the luxury brand advent calendar drama year after year like I know what a crystal ornament is worth.

  • @kendra5062
    @kendra5062 11 місяців тому +45

    Alllll the characters they have, the simple yet cute ornaments that could have been made and this is what you get. That’s CRAZY

  • @kateemma22
    @kateemma22 10 місяців тому +5

    The Mickey on day 25 doesn't even look like it fits with the themes of the other ones. It's so different in every way.

  • @Just4Fun1276
    @Just4Fun1276 11 місяців тому +469

    cherry wasn't complaining about color variation, the color on her ornaments were completely wrong - Donald Duck was completely pink!

    • @jenspatig8547
      @jenspatig8547 11 місяців тому +75

      Yes. The colors on the ones Cherry received were horrible.

    • @Boxofcare666
      @Boxofcare666 11 місяців тому +5

      Yeah chloe sounds so gaslightning

    • @brookem3889
      @brookem3889 11 місяців тому +85

      That's definitely not gaslighting lmfao she just mentioned there was colour misprints and didn't go into specifics about the errors others received.

    • @ozfroggirl9221
      @ozfroggirl9221 11 місяців тому +19

      A completely pink Donald would also be a misprint issue.

    • @Yoruake89
      @Yoruake89 11 місяців тому +24

      I saw a lot of people open this up and not a single person liked it. Broken ornaments, missing ribbons, misprints, variation in colours... 1300 $... Hell no!

  • @librarychair
    @librarychair 11 місяців тому +19

    So, Swarovski used to sell components directly to consumers for crafting purposes, they stopped about a year ago and now only sell to manufacturers. About 2/3 of these (generously) just look like they were assembled from components that you could buy for a few bucks from the bead catalog. And yeah, crystal is just glass. Usually with lead in it to make it sparklier, but you'll find a lot of lead-free glass marked as crystal too.

  • @murmur9994
    @murmur9994 11 місяців тому +17

    I've heard that Disney is increasingly pushing on "whales" when it comes to its marketing strategy, and this seems in line with that. Expensive nostalgia farming for as little investment as possible on their side. I'm sure they payed as little as possible to the designers to create the whole set.

  • @Jo-razz
    @Jo-razz 11 місяців тому +35

    I didn't expect print on the Crystal.
    I thought they would be like the Mickey sculpted into Crystal.
    The necklaces was cute.
    LOL I probably take each individual one out and give it as a Christmas gift .
    Cheap one ornament & a necklace.😉

  • @mossydreamz
    @mossydreamz 11 місяців тому +47

    this entire video feels like a bass-boosted version of the time i walked into a crystal shop, saw small grape-sized piece of "opal light" priced at $25 a piece, and immediately turned around and walked away. THAT! IS! GLASS!

  • @franciscomoralesguzman9307
    @franciscomoralesguzman9307 10 місяців тому +4

    lol love that she did break the mickey head one when dropping the heavy star looking thing on it at 9:27

  • @gokuxsephiroth4505
    @gokuxsephiroth4505 11 місяців тому +64

    Considering it's all glass, that's a real rip-off for over a thousand dollars. I bought a glass hummingbird for my own christmas tree from the market for £8, and I like it better than all of these combined.

    • @DoritoBot9000
      @DoritoBot9000 11 місяців тому +4

      It seems a lot of people are unaware that it’s glass. Also that “crystals” isn’t a synonym to gemstones.

  • @inspiredbystarr
    @inspiredbystarr 11 місяців тому +80

    Right before you picked up the broken Micky ears... You dropped that sharp heavy star on it. So you did break it

  • @gaphic
    @gaphic 10 місяців тому +7

    Crystal isn't just cut to look like diamonds, it is actually a chemically different kind of glass that has higher clarity and sparkle than regular glass! Swarovski is just the best-known (and most expensive) brand of crystal.
    Based on my knowledge of other, less brand-recognized companies like Crystal Passions and Preciosa, I would ballpark the upper-end pricetag of those snowflakes at 15$, the stars maybe, 30$ due to being so much more material, the glove, present and candycane around 40$, and the sculpted Mickey head around 50$. Those one-sided circle ornaments, however, even Swarovski should be fucking embarrassed to price higher than 10$, same for the stickers. The double-sided, embellished circles I could see at 25$, the flat Mickey heads 20$, and the necklaces maybe 50$ depending on the metal used.
    That comes to $580.

  • @isabellabeatriz2242
    @isabellabeatriz2242 11 місяців тому +86

    It's so insane that someone would allow a product like this to be made at this price range.

    • @paulwoodford1984
      @paulwoodford1984 11 місяців тому +4

      Disney are getting desperate. They have lost so much money with their movies in the last 5,6 years

    • @Lionwoman
      @Lionwoman 10 місяців тому +3

      Well... if people are buying it...
      sad.

  • @necronaymicon9662
    @necronaymicon9662 11 місяців тому +63

    Evidently, the candy cane and the other "non-disney-but-copyright-disney" ornaments are just Christmas Swarovski things exclusive to the calendar. Though if I'm personally honest, I like the heavy, star-shaped ones: they're so pretty

    • @BIP64
      @BIP64 11 місяців тому +7

      Yes, they are. And I like the round things she compares to a christmas pudding. To me they look like round ornaments, the upper third of which is covered in frost, or snow. They have a nice wintry, christmasy vibe.

    • @allislove9890
      @allislove9890 10 місяців тому +2

      The star shape of a "merkaba," is reasonably similar ( interlocked triangular solids) It's a part of sacred geometry and represents the balance of spirit, body and light.
      You can buy beautiful real gemstone ones for much, much less.
      Happy New Year, happiness and blessings to you !

    • @kohakufi9
      @kohakufi9 2 місяці тому

      I was looking for these comments I'm glad that someone said it. They aren't meant to be Disney, they are meant to be Christmas themed(candy cane, presents, ornaments, Santa glove, etc..) but are tagged Disney because they are in the collection.

  • @LolitaChadieieva
    @LolitaChadieieva 10 днів тому +3

    I love how she tries to save the situation by saying that these are crystals, not glass, but Swarovski is literally just expensive glass. My respect to this brand though, you have to be able to sell glass so masterfully

  • @soelectric100
    @soelectric100 11 місяців тому +422

    I can forgive them for not having Disney products for all 25 days, but I absolutely can not forgive them for their terrible quality control!

    • @AlexaFaie
      @AlexaFaie 11 місяців тому +15

      Its glass. Its going to be fragile. And if you drop one heavy pointy glass object onto another fragile glass object exactly on the thinnest part (where the ear joined) then its going to break. Nothing quality control can do about Chloe being clumsy!

    • @soelectric100
      @soelectric100 11 місяців тому +43

      @@AlexaFaie oh I totally agree. My comment on quality control was about the discoloration on the character's faces and the backward print of those little Minnie mouse on the round ornament. Chloe has always been clumsy lol but that's why I like her.

    • @table2.0
      @table2.0 10 місяців тому +6

      You really shouldn’t forgive anything about this, the comments make an excellent point about all the iconography they could’ve pulled from for inspiration but no, they only used Mickey and Minnie and Donald lol
      A glass slipper or pretty red glass apple would’ve been so nice

  • @amandah2490
    @amandah2490 11 місяців тому +137

    Walt Disney must be turning in his grave at how bad Disney is now. Crappy movies and now crappy advent calendars! 😄

    • @jpbaley2016
      @jpbaley2016 10 місяців тому

      He was turning in his grave as a racist, anti-semite, and a bigot he would have had an aneurysm over the inclusivity of Disney’s policies.

    • @TheStepmonkey
      @TheStepmonkey 10 місяців тому

      Exactly 💀💀

  • @ennanitsua
    @ennanitsua 8 днів тому +4

    If i had paid for this, it would be incredibly disappointing. As a spectator, it's just depressing. As Disney 100, you really expect a deeper Disney cut than just Mickey, Minnie, Donald and Daisy. They could have done things like the iconic innovations that Disney has done, animator sketches, symbols of different films and franchises, and ffs no logos. This is a really poor representation of the brand, and thats not even counting the lack of variety in the ornaments themselves. By day 10, i would have screamed if i opened anything else mickey themed.

  • @Carmell1206
    @Carmell1206 11 місяців тому +94

    I can't imagine what I could possibly do with a $50 sticker!?!?!

  • @TwistyKitty
    @TwistyKitty 11 місяців тому +176

    The quality of this calendar doesn't surprise me. Their crystal itself is high quality and beautifully made, but their craftsmanship of actual products has tanked. My engagement ring was from Swarovski (and before anyone attempts to poopoo my partner for buying me crystal glass instead of diamonds, I was the one who told him if he ever proposed to buy a ring from Swarovski) and they ended up replacing my ring 3 times before I finally gave up and stopped wearing it because they crystals continued to pop out of the setting just from daily wear. It was so disappointing to love the quality of the crystal they make only to be left utterly disappointed in how poor their jewelry was.

    • @Jessica-ch1yi
      @Jessica-ch1yi 11 місяців тому +8

      That sucks, could you maybe take it to a better jeweler and get them to set the crystal in properly? I’ve never had jewelry expensive enough that I take it anywhere to be fixed so Idk if they could do it or not

    • @TwistyKitty
      @TwistyKitty 11 місяців тому +9

      @@Jessica-ch1yi unfortunately, no. I can't find the ring to see the details online because it was bought in 2011, but the setting is really weird. I think the inlay material was some sort of resin or jeweler's cement and that's where they fall out. I've never seen other jewelry with this setting and they don't seem to be using it on any of there current rings. And even if it was something another jeweler could fix, all the missing stones are long gone. 😩

    • @nicolecourter2870
      @nicolecourter2870 11 місяців тому +28

      I would never say anything about your fiancé not buying a diamond.
      Diamonds are worthless and a huge waste of money. I think you two are smart for not buying into the diamond scam.

    • @TwistyKitty
      @TwistyKitty 11 місяців тому

      @@nicolecourter2870 I completely agree! It's a complete waste of money and the prices are all because of false scarcity created by jewelers. Someone wanting to make a lifelong commitment to another person is worth more than a shiny rock ever could, and I wish more people felt that way.

    • @Jessica-ch1yi
      @Jessica-ch1yi 11 місяців тому

      @@TwistyKitty ah, that’s too bad, maybe you 2 could go and find an affordable but nicer quality replacement some time

  • @FreyasArts
    @FreyasArts 11 місяців тому +6

    The reason why Advent calendars usually only go untill the 24th is because it was originally a German tradition and in Germany you celebrate Christmas and open your presents on the 24th 😊

  • @LisaMarieFord
    @LisaMarieFord 11 місяців тому +95

    I commented similar on Cherry Wallis’ video as well: As someone who has collected some crystal over the years and who has made Pieces of Light with genuine Swarovski crystals, here’s my thoughts. (I do not work for them nor do I collect the expensive figurines.)
    - Even though Swarovski has a higher price point, it’s for the made in Austria, old company quality of excellence and how they’re made…. or supposed to be made. For the price point on that advent calendar the price should have been at the bare minimum half and that is being VERY generous. All of the individual pieces used to make each ornament do cost, especially if they are crystal glass, then there is the making them together, but at that price point even with inflation and brand tax it doesn’t add up. Not even figuring in the packaging, presentation, and handling does it add up. If they were all Day 25 quality, maybe.
    - Sticker rhinestones, regardless of whether they’re crystal or not, don’t go with a set in that price point. I know they’ve been pushing their stickers and little jewelry things for some years, but I prefer the legit crystals or at least the crystal beads.
    - As for the set, in Swarovski and Disney’s defense two things; Just about all Swarovski sets come with either snowflakes, stars, or Edelweiss, or the first two, or all three. It’s a Disney and Swarovski set, not just Disney. And technically everything in there could be based upon any number of Disney things; including Silly Symphonies, shorts, or even Disney World decorations. Not saying it shouldn’t have had more than just mouse ears, but I think that’s kind of the theme they were going for. Most of those ornaments, as others have already said, goes with Mickey decorating the tree with Pluto and then there’s the Donald Duck one before Chip and Dale show up. It was a missed opportunity that at least half the days weren’t like Day 25.
    - When Swarovski changed several years back I’d noticed more things seeming to be outsourced and not of the same caliber as their true crystals made in Austria. I never bought the other stuff for my creations, just the legit crystals and crystal beads. I’m guessing the printed ornaments were made or printed by a third party. The crystal doesn’t even look the same quality, let alone the misprints. And those are most notably tagged “Disney”.
    - As part of that; I have a couple genuine Swarosvki sets for their anniversaries and things. Everything, and I mean EVERYTHING, was always trademarked with the little symbol by the brand name. That it’s not on the packaging for the advent calendar leaves me with some questions. Even if they did outsource the manufacturing of the packaging it should have had the trademarked brand name; unless everything was. Genuine Swarovski Crystals also have the teeny tiny symbol in the crystal. It’s difficult to see from here, but I wonder if they all did. I saw the little tags for Disney, but not Swarovski, which makes me wonder if Disney had more of a hand on those pieces. In the past when they’ve partnered with brands they’ve etched both brands into the crystal, which was annoying and awful in my opinion, but still seems weird.
    - For that price point they should have included more pure crystal glass items. They sell Mickey, Minnie, Donald, Daisy, Cinderella’s glass slipper, and so forth. Granted all these figurines are extremely expensive, but a miniature ornament would have been easier. There honestly should have been no rhodium plated jewelry nor rhinestone stickers, and definitely not printed on crystal cabochon styled ornaments. They are quite capable of etching their crystals. Etched crystals with characters faces would have been much better and a much better quality. Honestly, those printed ones looked more like acrylic or cheap glass and not crystal. You can have slight color variation or effects variation in well made crystal, and I know that is the company statement, but not to the scale some of these these sets have.
    - Also the frosted circle, which oddly enough both you and Cherry thought of pudding, is meant to be for a traditional globe style Christmas ornament or bauble; often blown glass and frosted. It’s one of THE most used shapes for ornaments, but instead of a full globe they compressed it to be somewhat flatter.
    I wouldn’t be surprised if returns are soon no longer an option or will not be for future sets by the amount of buyers’ remorse returns they get with this one…. especially when opened already. They should, since like Cherry you had some defects, but they might for exchanges not allow full refunds so definitely get on that ASAP… especially since you opened it on video.

    • @Scholar_of_the_Dark_Arts
      @Scholar_of_the_Dark_Arts 11 місяців тому +16

      Really interesting! Thank you for having taken the time to write such a long comment 😊

    • @LisaMarieFord
      @LisaMarieFord 11 місяців тому +8

      @@Scholar_of_the_Dark_Arts Thank you kindly for reading it and replying. 😊

    • @sarax4493
      @sarax4493 11 місяців тому +3

      Very interesting pov. I’m not an expert whatsoever but I too have noticed a decrease in their quality. To be honest i feel a lot of brands are going down the same road

    • @dshe8637
      @dshe8637 11 місяців тому

      But it's just ordinary glass. It has no value, just hype

    • @LisaMarieFord
      @LisaMarieFord 11 місяців тому +1

      @@sarax4493 Thank you kindly. Yes, I agree with you. Unfortunately, that seems to be a recurring thing with too many companies; lower the quality to lower costs but don’t lower the price to consumers, maybe raise it instead. ☹️ That “race to the bottom” as my dad always says. It makes no sense.

  • @tschoiy
    @tschoiy 11 місяців тому +69

    There used to be this GIANT Swarovski Christmas tree in Zürich main station, a real tree fully covered in white Swarovski crystals and the way it sparkled in the light was truly magical! Loved to visit it every year! This calendar however is truly a very sad Train wreck…

  • @SharenLCotie
    @SharenLCotie 5 днів тому +1

    I think you have to be a true collector to be really happy with this. I do know that you wouldn’t really appreciate all of the ornaments you have to see them on a tree seeing the way the lights go through the crystals

  • @kelseywillow8110
    @kelseywillow8110 11 місяців тому +37

    “I was very careful with them” but also drops them ten times 😂 hahaha the printing issue is horrible though

  • @lavieenlavande
    @lavieenlavande 11 місяців тому +49

    I was so excited to watch you open this since I watched Cherry’s review the other day. What’s apparent to me is how bad the quality control was because the variations in the colors of your Mickey & Minnie / Donald & Daisy was even different than hers.
    What a bummer. There’s no way this is close to being worth $1300. The quality control was absent and for the most part the designs were so lazy for the ornaments considering the Disney collab. The packaging seemed to be about the best thing other than the necklace but even that didn’t have crystals all around. Just feels very lazy and not successful at even satisfying their target market.

  • @nataliebateman1151
    @nataliebateman1151 2 дні тому +2

    What would have been cute is mini figurines/statues of different Disney characters. This calendar is not worth that much money. Especially as it's not all Disney

  • @ChantelleArts
    @ChantelleArts 11 місяців тому +76

    This advent calendar is wild 😳 where do they get the audacity to charge this much for barely Disney themed bad quality decorations?? I have a Disney Pandora bead of cinderallas crown and that is a cool actual Disney design, like that’s all they had to do 😮❤❤

  • @mcrowcreations
    @mcrowcreations 11 місяців тому +60

    Ok so back in the mid 90s my uncle got me and my mom several crystal ornaments. Every single one of them had weight to it, it was THICK crystal - comparing what I know of the ornaments and what I’m seeing here I’m lead to believe these have got to be a lower quality than what they sell on a normal basis. Excluding the last one, they all look (to me) like they were produced by hallmark - they aren’t cheap but in comparison to swarovski they are. I definitely hope you’ve got the return process started, it’s really disappointing this is what they put out.

  • @visperallegedgirlsgogamesc3191
    @visperallegedgirlsgogamesc3191 10 місяців тому +3

    it strongly feels like they worked on the last one as an exclusive design, slapped a few cheap prints on some standard shaped crystals and then reused old designs of ornaments with a "Disney tag" to justify the price. I can understand that its a luxury brand name and like Chloe said it comes to about 54 dollars each which doesnt give much room to work with but they should've just released an exclusive 100 collection instead with actual thought out, well structured designs that are really worth buying for collectors

  • @Cationna
    @Cationna 11 місяців тому +232

    Idk if that makes me a bad person, but i literally giggled every single time Chloe butchered the pronunciation of "Swarovski" in a new way 😂 (listen, as a Pole who constantly mispronounces English words, let me have this, ok)

    • @alicegaiba
      @alicegaiba 11 місяців тому +10

      How is it supposed to be pronounced? Because I'm Italian and we pronounce everything just the way it's written and I guess that's wrong as well 😅

    • @DrawYourBliss
      @DrawYourBliss 11 місяців тому +18

      Cracked me up too ! I'm French and just like you I don't care about wrong pronunciation etc but it made me laugh how it seemed to be different everytime and still wrong, but not wrong like saying it right but adding english accent to it but wrong like it's not the right word at all 😂

    • @patpionke
      @patpionke 11 місяців тому +14

      The SW in Swarovski is pronounced exactly that way. She pronounces it SHW.

    • @Cationna
      @Cationna 11 місяців тому +11

      @@alicegaiba i mean it is pronounced "as written" to me too, but I guess it depends on the rules of one's language 😂 basically w is pronounced like v and s like s, not like š. So it's just like S-var-OFF-ski haha

    • @Man-ej6uv
      @Man-ej6uv 11 місяців тому +6

      yeah it kinda irked me lol

  • @Mama_bird_to_all
    @Mama_bird_to_all 11 місяців тому +42

    If you want to have a great advent calendar, buy a nice wood calendar...then fill it yourself every year. I bought one when my kids were little and they absolutely love opening those little doors getting a piece of their favorite candy and a small thing they really like. A hotwheels car, a piece of jewelry, some stickers or temp tattoos, hair accessories, and this year, my teen son got paintable mini figures and a video game chip. and I guarantee we've never spent $1300, even with two teens 😅

    • @foreverpainful
      @foreverpainful 2 місяці тому

      i saw a gigantic wooden advent calendar at a thrift shop for $100 i cant exaggerate how HUGE it was. and it was gorgeous.

  • @ashrowan2143
    @ashrowan2143 6 днів тому +1

    My mum was gifted a Swarovski snowflake ornament, it is about the size of my palm and INCREDIBLY heavy it has to be placed on a very sturdy branch and because of this is often placed high up on the tree so it can both be close to the trunk for stability and still be readily visible

  • @PurlingQueen
    @PurlingQueen 11 місяців тому +113

    Every christmas it is tradition in Sweden to see a show with different Disney cartoons. In one of them Mickey is decorating a tree with Pluto and Chip n Dale. Some of the ornaments in the calendar looks like a Swarovski version of the ornaments Mickey decorates his tree with. I do think that is the connection with Disney.

    • @Linnzy
      @Linnzy 11 місяців тому +34

      As someone from Sweden aswell, I can see it being like that but I still feel it being a stretch since there is no real mentioning of it.

    • @Leena79
      @Leena79 11 місяців тому +8

      I live in Finland, and we have that same tradition. The story about Mickey decorating the tree is my favourite cartoon ever, and I think my idea of what the perfect christmas tree looks like comes from how colourful that tree was - before the distruction.

    • @GaskyChan
      @GaskyChan 11 місяців тому +5

      We do that in Denmark as well "Disneys Juleshow"

    • @laurens3857
      @laurens3857 11 місяців тому +9

      Its called Pluto’s Christmas tree and it’s from 1952 if anyone was wanting to check it out. It’s a 5 ish minute short and I think it’s a nice classic short. (Unless there’s another similar one lol.)

    • @Leena79
      @Leena79 11 місяців тому

      @@laurens3857 Yup! I looked it up, it's on Disney+, and it's still just as good as it was when I was a kid.

  • @Starsgirl09
    @Starsgirl09 11 місяців тому +186

    I saw another person who is a Disney fan who returned it. I forget her name, but she popped up with the review video in my suggested over Thanksgiving. I would do the same. Look into it....1300 is too much to just settle.

    • @airicastarwall1349
      @airicastarwall1349 11 місяців тому +33

      CherryWallis did that. Not sure if that's who you're think of tho

    • @Starsgirl09
      @Starsgirl09 11 місяців тому +8

      @@airicastarwall1349 I believe it is! Thank you!

    • @pettykittyfam
      @pettykittyfam 11 місяців тому +8

      ​@@airicastarwall1349That's it! I watched it & it was a disaster 😆
      Poor Cherry & now Chloe 😭
      They paid WAY TOO MUCH 😕
      So typical of Disney to RIP people off!

    • @gggthsb
      @gggthsb 11 місяців тому +9

      @@pettykittyfam I mean Swarovsky ripps people off as well so the combo of both is just a straight up desaster...

    • @Ranga3595
      @Ranga3595 11 місяців тому +1

      ​@pettykittyfam it's Swarovsky, not Disney doing the ripping off here

  • @Lilian040210
    @Lilian040210 11 місяців тому +8

    The crystals are a scam, the Disney brand overpricing is a scam. Girl willingly got herself scammed squared😂😭

  • @cc_snipergirl
    @cc_snipergirl 11 місяців тому +9

    The only thing uniquely Disney was that last ornament. Everything else was glued together with stickers slapped on it like when you forget about that school project until it's due tomorrow. Those necklaces you can buy for $15 at a gift shop.

  • @DragonFiry
    @DragonFiry 11 місяців тому +147

    i think the mickey pendant broke when that star thingie fell on it :( usually accessories or elements in Swarowsky crystals are kind of… lightly glued together (to put my thoughts on words xD apologies) making them extremely delicate. Shame it costs so much for basically no Disney themed wearable accessories, at least you got a couple cute necklaces out of it! Hoped they could be bought separately tho.
    Not going to lie, it’s a shame most items can’t even be displayed properly unless on a stand 🥲

    • @chelseasavory2618
      @chelseasavory2618 11 місяців тому +32

      It did so she did break it 😔

    • @liliadavey692
      @liliadavey692 11 місяців тому +35

      Yeah I was wondering if anyone else saw that because she did unfortunately break it so can’t blame the company for that part

    • @ronniemadden322
      @ronniemadden322 11 місяців тому +26

      I was also wondering if anyone else saw that too. She did drop the star on the ear.

    • @hilaryg6293
      @hilaryg6293 11 місяців тому +19

      I saw that too. It’s still a terrible calendar, it just wasn’t broken when she unpacked it.

    • @caitlinwhatthefrick2361
      @caitlinwhatthefrick2361 11 місяців тому +3

      I’m glad she’s getting a refund

  • @ChristoSays
    @ChristoSays 11 місяців тому +2

    Day 5 is a hidden Mickey I believe. The three green stones in the center are positioned so that they’re centered on the ears and head. The snow is outlining the tops of the ears around the top two green stones.

  • @arnold20139
    @arnold20139 11 місяців тому +110

    This is the moat depressing advent calendar I've ever seen. Disney 100 can't get any worse than this junk. 😢

    • @verminjerky
      @verminjerky 11 місяців тому +7

      From what I've seen, Disney took that as a challenge. Basically a race to the bottom.

    • @Seldarius
      @Seldarius 10 місяців тому

      Check out the Chanel calendar. It’s worse. 😂

  • @Softsqueakyduck
    @Softsqueakyduck 11 місяців тому +35

    These kind of products can kill a business. I feel if you're going to shell out that much money, the quality would be waaaay better. Seeing this advent calendar would prevent me shopping with Sworovski ever.

  • @TheDanielRodriguez
    @TheDanielRodriguez 2 дні тому +1

    Almost a year later and, speaking as a collector, I'm more than certain if you find the right reselling platform, you can make your money back on this collection in its complete entirety, and then some! Even the individual ornaments are worth more now! All you gotta do is find the right sucker...er...um...buyer....😂

  • @WooHooCelery
    @WooHooCelery 11 місяців тому +28

    I have a few Swarovski crystal ornaments that I inherited from my granny and I fully expected everything in this calendar to be like them (so pretty much like the final item). They’re thick ornaments with a bit of weight to them so nowhere near as fragile as poor Mickey’s ear that got cut off. I’d be extremely annoyed if I had bought this, not just because of the atrocious price but how hastily put together everything seems.

  • @Mrs.Ohara1
    @Mrs.Ohara1 11 місяців тому +129

    Dying laughing “I was very careful, it wasn’t me” meanwhile you just smashed it with the giant star ornament lol 🤦🏻‍♀️

    • @Abigail_Wyatt
      @Abigail_Wyatt 11 місяців тому +3

      EXACTLY WHAT I SAID!!!😂🤣 lol She subconsciously knows it was her lol.

    • @lilredhead17
      @lilredhead17 11 місяців тому +9

      She dropped another ornament later on. 2 droppings (1 which caused a break), clearly not careful...

    • @thelastwish558
      @thelastwish558 11 місяців тому

      ​@@lilredhead17yeah...

  • @LauraBow
    @LauraBow 13 годин тому +2

    For 1300 all of the ornaments should have looked like the last one

  • @Magical_Trash
    @Magical_Trash 11 місяців тому +31

    The fact that Disney 100 yr anniversary advent calendar is as disappointing as their movie, is honestly so fitting 😑

  • @skylergrace5068
    @skylergrace5068 11 місяців тому +134

    9:25 actually you did break it. When you pulled it out of the box it was perfectly fine. Then you dropped the star, you can see it landed on the ear and yeah it broke. So it didn’t come like that. You broke it.

    • @DrawYourBliss
      @DrawYourBliss 11 місяців тому +24

      I saw it too and I was like ... wait it was like 1 second before, you literally made a heavy pointed item fall on it 😅

    • @Abigail_Wyatt
      @Abigail_Wyatt 11 місяців тому +3

      Lol I love how she says “IT WASNT ME! IT WASNT ME!” Because subconsciously she knows it was her lol😂🤣😂🤣

    • @AlexaFaie
      @AlexaFaie 11 місяців тому +4

      You can even hear it breaking as she's talking too. I blinked at the bit where it hit and had to wind it back to confirm, but I heard a very distinct glass/crystal breaking sound. I really hope they see this video and don't refund her if she tries to claim it came like that. If she had opened it all, been disappointed and then returned it then fine, I'd be supportive of that. But you don't break something and then try to get a refund for your mistakes!

    • @skylergrace5068
      @skylergrace5068 11 місяців тому +4

      @@AlexaFaie she was notttt being careful at allll. She was throwing the ornaments around. To be fair the string attached to the ornaments wasn’t very secure on some of them tho and that was an issue on the manufacturer. Buuuttt in this case of the broken ear. That was 100% her fault and hopefully she can own up to that and not make any false claims cause there’s legit evidence. Idk how she could think it came like that when she pulled it out of the box perfectly fine and dropped a heavy piece on top of it. I love Chloe but come on. Edit- just want to add she went straight to being defensive and blaming them.

    • @LCLand
      @LCLand 11 місяців тому

      Another commenter says he sold Swarovski and the ears fall off easily. Unless we saw what happened we can’t be sure she did it. She mentions the video was edited different,y from how that actually happened.

  • @Sarah-gz4no
    @Sarah-gz4no 2 місяці тому +2

    Well, idk why I got suggested this in Sept., but that necklace? Def looks like something you could get at Tj Maxx for like 12.99