This was a good movie, I bought a 1970 challenger , 426 hemi race engine , mine is black 4 speed manual dana 60 positrack full options, it was my graduation present when my parents won a shitload of cash in Reno 1971. I was the coolest guy in my high school.. Still have it, never sell it for any price....
That scene alone honours the original movie from 1970/71. Makes both movies equally iconic (IMHO). Besides " 'takes a Mopar to catch a Mopar" and "My wife yes. My dog maybe. My Dodge... NEVER" are classics..lol
I bought a 70 Challenger 440 R/T SE back in 1973 with 16 thousand original miles. It was a 4 speed car with a 410 dana. I ran it up to 6 grand on 35w between Forest lake MN and New Brighton MN at around 5:30 on a Sunday morning with no other traffic I was going right around 120 mph with calm winds. The aerodynamics were so poor the front end got enough air under it that I could not keep it in one lane. I have driven cars across frozen lakes at eighty MPH and felt that I had more control. So the 160 Mph they showed on the movie car speedo was shall we say a little bit of creative licence on the directors part. But lets face it no buddy bought those types of cars for their top speed especially with 410 gears. Mine could hold its own stop light to stop light racing on Central ave between the Sun Drive in and White Castle in Minneapolis.
HEY Joe. You'll be glad to hear that if you look really close at the end of the 71 version , it's a 67 or 68 camreo YEAH no shit seems that the producer's were mopar people
@@robertadams9699 actually it had something to do with Chrysler. They didn't want any of their cars even used in the movie. I read an article on this year's ago. Something to that nature.
My heart breaks every time, it is said that if you listen carefully at 3:00am you can hear the ghost of a speeding 1970 Dodge Challenger R/T on the road way over yonder...... :'(
My first girlfriend lost her innocence in the backseat of my '68 R/T Charger. Two months later her sister lost hers on my hood! I wish I would have kept that beauty (the car.......of course)!
Not only is the 1971 version a WAY better movie, but in the original, Kowalski always stuck around to see if the people that crashed were okay. It was part of his goodguy character.
That car (or any car for that matter) would be less than half of its original length after a crash like that. And how did the wheels change from Mopar Ralley rims to Cragar SS?
Never ceases to amaze me that whenever a car crashes and explodes into flames, the front end of the car just erupts in those flames despite the fact that there is probably not more than a pint of gas in the carb and fuel lines in the front of the car.
I like the original but in 1997 version it was more EMOTIONAL to see how he realised he lost everything, how everything he did lost its meaning, and how in the last seconds of his life he dreamed of his wife in the guise of an angel. And then BOOM! Both movies were pure fun but 1997 was a little bit better for me
"It takes a Mopar to catch a Mopar" Yet another case of Hollywood's disconnection from reality! PS. Having certain scenes repeat 3-4 times, just simply Sucked Balls... Stop It !!!!!
and then the demon came out and now it's got quite a title going for it. there aren't a whole lot of vehicles that can run 10's in the 1/4 from the factory. super cars can't even beat the demon's raw horsepower. and even the hyper cars struggle to do it. the only vehicle that poses a challenge is the tesla p100d.
Having seen the original Vanishing Point "first run", double featured w/Easy Rider at an Indy drive-inn in 1971, I must say THIS IS ONE LAME MOVIE! Dad burned the tires in our '67 Coronet 500 pulling out, after "Captain America & Billy" and "Kowalski" died...as did practically everyone. The drive-inn "cop" just looked away...heh heh. That was a great summer!! Dang, now I'm nostalgic, missing my Mom & Dad. Dumb-ole UA-cam anyway...
I agree, the first one was WAY better. This one it seemed like they thought how can we keep it as close as we can to the original but really screw it up. Worst part was the ending. They should never have added the commentary
The end music is so Beautiful the car chase the voice hard so explain just makes me want to see my dad agen he went to heaven in 2017 so I miss him so much thank you for your time
bill hickman... a legend. I'll always remember the face on his passenger in the chase in that movie, a look of total stunned awe and a good bit of fear as he whipped that whale through traffic in what had to have been a pants-shitting experience no matter how much choreography was involved (he gets the credit for that too because he was also the choreographer). I could never tell how much of that face was real, but seeing the driving I believe there wasn't any acting involved.
I love the original Vanishing Point, as it portrays something of the nihilism of late Vietnam-era US culture with Barry Newman and a white Challenger on the road to nowhere. This remake was so godawful that I was rooting for the bulldozers...
Original movie... Kowalski chose the bulldozers. They were the vanishing point of his life. The whole movie was a series of flashbacks on Kowalski's life that began and ended with the bulldozers. A *man* living his life on his own terms and ending it the same way.
Good compilation of old and new mixed together. The original was 1971 of course. Enjoyed this one. In the real movie, the car that hit the bulldozers was a Camaro.
Actually the original Vanishing Point the Challengers were 1970's not '71's. There were multiple ones, I believe 4. The cars were loaned/leased to them to make the movie and had to return them when done filming. Therefore they toed a stripped '67 Camaro into the bulldozers.
+pmkrak So 4 people ended up with gently driven 70 Challengers. The ending is impressive as hell, much better than CGI. I got to do an Alinement on a 70 Challenger 440/Pistol grip 4speed in 1989 or so and it was ALOT faster than I expected.
Haha! "Hit those bulldozers at over 180mph." My ass... That challenger would be the size of a super sub-compact car if it did that. Not to mention the bulldozers would be seriously hurting.
The original Vanishing Point is so much better. In the original production the Challenger is really hauling ass...not a camera trick, or done in editing, the car is truly going extremely fast. This version of that great movie is cheezy. You wanna see a great flick, and some badass driving...search for the original. Fortunately Gone in 60 seconds was redone with taste and a great cast...The original, for it's day still kicks ass...but as a fan of that movie since it was debuted, my hat's off to Mr. Cage, and co-stars!
I saw the original. Have not bothered watching the remake. On a side note, raced a superB w/ the 440 interceptor against my 455-at 90 going on 100 mph - he looked at me, smiled, and just WALKED AWAY from my damn 455 like it was nothing!!!! Pissed me off big time, but what the hell.
I flipped a car going that fast once…it was a 1995 Honda Del Sol Si with a Honda 2.2L H22A4 DOHC VTEC swapped in _(which came available after a family friend’s 1997 Honda Prelude got rolled over by a giant construction vehicle, so, the shop where the car ended up & deemed it a _total loss_ called my dad, I was making tons of money doing graphic design, web programming & I bought the motor for $2700, used the 5-speed which was already in the car (as far as I know)… I was racing it against my best friend since second grade who was in a 1997 Mitsubishi Eclipse GSX…I have no physical memory of the crash or the summer surrounding that accident, I remember waking up in a Hospital Bed , the girl who’d been me secretary all that summer lying in the hospital bed with a nylon net around it, and I remember she was crying, hugging me, I had no idea what was going on…
That's cool mine was a 73 and a 73 charger 69 super Bee 383 4 speed 69 Coronet 440 got to love them mopars 🍀get R done 😎✌️ oh yeah 74 power wagon and a 100 3-speed column shift and now 2019 ram classic two-door square box 5.7 hemi 🥳
So the Challenger hits the buckets of two front end loaders at 185 mph and they don't budge. Considering the force of the impact would have destroyed everything in sight, should have just done it.
If the car was doing anything over 40 mph, the blades would've caused the front end to rise and the car probably woulda flipped backwards, after the motor exited the front end through the space between the blades.
Decent engine sounds. May actually be Mopar engine's. I made the mistake of reading the comment thread. Most of them made me loose a little more faith in humanity. Wow
I can't wait for the remake of this movie. I will bet they F__k it up with a new Dodge Charger instead of a cool car like the Challenger ... Any body else want to take a bet on what car they use for the remake of 2019
You know that this version was a remake, right? But if they want to screw up another sorry ass remake, why not go for broke and use a Challenger Demon? And I actually like the current 4 door Charger; Australia had 4 door muscle cars for years, plus the Charger still has the power to back up the name. I remember when Dodge brought out a derivative of the Omni 024 front drive sporty coupe and called it a Charger too. The little 2.2 was decently peppy, and the Shelby Chargers were surprisingly quick, particularly with the Shelby GLH-S turbo engine. Besides, the best reason to not hate the four door Charger is that without it, the Challenger wouldn't exist at all. Underneath the body, they are the same car, so one way to look at the Challenger is as the two door version of the Charger with different bodywork.
They can't re-make the original...The sensibilities are different.The world is different. Who would believe any car could evade capture across multiple states in today's advanced technology world
Jose Brown - - yeppers, the Native Americans lost a bit of freedom with creation of barbed wire fences, highways & rail lines. Today's Americans lost a bit of freedom from 2-way radios & aircraft monitoring. But I still like to push the envelope in my '16 Challenger SXT - - sadly, too much traffic even on the highway has only allowed me to get to 112 (so far).
Havent seen Vanishing Point in years. Havent seen Vanishing Point in years. Love those old muscle cars. Love those old muscle cars
🤣
Me too. Me too. They're awesome. They're awesome.👍🏁👍🏁
🤣🤣
I'm gonna get the papers get the papers
Say everything twice. Say everything twice.
poor charger when it crashes... even when I was a toddler, I felt sad since I loved cars a lot then. Love cars even more, the more I learn about em
This was a good movie, I bought a 1970 challenger , 426 hemi race engine , mine is black 4 speed manual dana 60 positrack full options, it was my graduation present when my parents won a shitload of cash in Reno 1971. I was the coolest guy in my high school.. Still have it, never sell it for any price....
Richard Woods - - excellent & I am green eith envy! 😎 Guess I'll have to settle for my '16 Challenger SXT (until I get a V-8 in the next few years).
You might want to rethink that a 70 challenger 4 speed hemi just sold for half a million on Bring A Trailer.
That scene alone honours the original movie from 1970/71. Makes both movies equally iconic (IMHO).
Besides " 'takes a Mopar to catch a Mopar" and "My wife yes. My dog maybe. My Dodge... NEVER" are classics..lol
The best acting was done by the cars.
Viggo Mortensen was pretty good, and he will NEVER WORK THAT CHEAP, EVER AGAIN!
"cheesy" editing, too.
WHERE. IS THE. #1. CUDA. !!!!!!!!!! 😎🍻
I bought a 70 Challenger 440 R/T SE back in 1973 with 16 thousand original miles. It was a 4 speed car with a 410 dana. I ran it up to 6 grand on 35w between Forest lake MN and New Brighton MN at around 5:30 on a Sunday morning with no other traffic I was going right around 120 mph with calm winds. The aerodynamics were so poor the front end got enough air under it that I could not keep it in one lane. I have driven cars across frozen lakes at eighty MPH and felt that I had more control. So the 160 Mph they showed on the movie car speedo was shall we say a little bit of creative licence on the directors part. But lets face it no buddy bought those types of cars for their top speed especially with 410 gears. Mine could hold its own stop light to stop light racing on Central ave between the Sun Drive in and White Castle in Minneapolis.
Good times.
what's with all the repeats? is it necessary to play some of the video & then replay it over again? Do they not think we saw it the first time?
Its so that he doesnt get copyrighted by UA-cam 👍
Destroying the Charger was a criminal act!
on sen calice !
Definitely, 68’s are rare.
Yea
It makes me feel sick every time I see a Charger destroyed on TV and in the movies, especially as rare and expensive as they are today!
Same here
Well,thats the reason🤠
The 1971 film is far better. Waste of a classic Challenger.
HEY Joe. You'll be glad to hear that if you look really close at the end of the 71 version , it's a 67 or 68 camreo YEAH no shit seems that the producer's were mopar people
@@robertadams9699 actually it had something to do with Chrysler. They didn't want any of their cars even used in the movie. I read an article on this year's ago. Something to that nature.
The acting blows in this remake....like most remakes do.
But Viggo Mortensen was in this movie
My heart breaks every time, it is said that if you listen carefully at 3:00am you can hear the ghost of a speeding 1970 Dodge Challenger R/T on the road way over yonder...... :'(
Did u mean the charger too
Strange Person I heard at 3 am you can hear the voice of the Devil
My first girlfriend lost her innocence in the backseat of my '68 R/T Charger. Two months later her sister lost hers on my hood! I wish I would have kept that beauty (the car.......of course)!
Pilgrim777 your boyfriend lost his ass in your car.
Haha, Pilgrim, the first time I read your comment I thought it said "my sister" rather than "her sister", and I was like, this dude is a real rooster!
rapist . lol
Pilgrim777 Hope she was legal age or baby Chris Hansen be peeking 😆😂👌
R3dp055um most likely was his sister.
Two MOPAR legends…
Going head-to-head against each other…
*NICE!*
Not only is the 1971 version a WAY better movie, but in the original, Kowalski always stuck around to see if the people that crashed were okay. It was part of his goodguy character.
what a waste of a good mopar
Michael Orlowski they used a Camaro in the original to crash if it makes you feel better
of two mopars.
That car (or any car for that matter) would be less than half of its original length after a crash like that. And how did the wheels change from Mopar Ralley rims to Cragar SS?
+Gregory Guza It Rally knocked the hell out of em.
@guza Since when do we start believing in Hollywood being realistic? GEEZ, take it for what it is.
Never ceases to amaze me that whenever a car crashes and explodes into flames, the front end of the car just erupts in those flames despite the fact that there is probably not more than a pint of gas in the carb and fuel lines in the front of the car.
Christopher Franklin : that hollyweird flammable anti-freeze.
Movie Magic
I like the original but in 1997 version it was more EMOTIONAL to see how he realised he lost everything, how everything he did lost its meaning, and how in the last seconds of his life he dreamed of his wife in the guise of an angel. And then BOOM!
Both movies were pure fun but 1997 was a little bit better for me
Vanishing Point, one of the greatest chase-movies of all time.
I like how the guy drives and shoots so as not to disturb his passenger who does happen to be riding "shotgun"
"It takes a Mopar to catch a Mopar" Yet another case of Hollywood's disconnection from reality!
PS. Having certain scenes repeat 3-4 times, just simply Sucked Balls... Stop It !!!!!
I was thinking the exact same thing!! I hate when people do this crap!
yeah that was really annoying.
it doesn't take a moparts car. to catch a moparts car😂😭😂😭😂😭
And then the hellcat came out proving that old saying to be right
and then the demon came out and now it's got quite a title going for it. there aren't a whole lot of vehicles that can run 10's in the 1/4 from the factory. super cars can't even beat the demon's raw horsepower. and even the hyper cars struggle to do it. the only vehicle that poses a challenge is the tesla p100d.
Thank God they wrecked a camaro at the end and not a Challenger.
Amen brother. I damn near fainted at the ending of the original. A few years later I found out it was a cookie cutter GM thing. Phew!
Lonnie Cavenee. Very good !!! It was a 1968 camaro??
I have had like 15 camaro !! Only have 2 now !! Big GM fan ,
The end of the remake used a Challenger
@@PUNCHYOURFACEreal nope, it was a Camaro. I have the movie on DVD and it shows the Camaro hitting the bulldozers in the making of the movie
This has to be a remake its not the orginal movie I have the original
That is the weirdest looking Barry Newman I ever saw.
Barry Newman WISHES he was Viggo Mortensen...
Cross ply tyres, drum brakes and leaf spring suspension, ahh, those were the days!
I drove a 70 Challenger once to a car auction ! it was a stick with a 340, 4 barrel and boy that thing would run !
In had one too canary yellow
340's were badass small blocks!
If you had that car now you could almost retire.
“It takes a Mopar to catch a Mopar” will be the first thing I get turned into a bumper sticker when I get my first Dodge vehicle.
This isn't the real Vanishing Point, it's a pale, made for TV imitation. Accept no substitutes.
Cleavon Little> Jason Priestley..."Super Soul" or a bad Alex Jones impersonator....I'll take Cleavon any day (RIP Cleavon Little)
The original movie from the 70's was best
Having seen the original Vanishing Point "first run", double featured w/Easy Rider at an Indy drive-inn in 1971, I must say THIS IS ONE LAME MOVIE! Dad burned the tires in our '67 Coronet 500 pulling out, after "Captain America & Billy" and "Kowalski" died...as did practically everyone. The drive-inn "cop" just looked away...heh heh. That was a great summer!! Dang, now I'm nostalgic, missing my Mom & Dad. Dumb-ole UA-cam anyway...
I saw the one with Barry Newman !
The whole movie was unreal and the actors mediocre. Only the cars were good.
That was the point.
+ElCid48 "The whole movie was unreal" That is solid gold.
I agree, the first one was WAY better. This one it seemed like they thought how can we keep it as close as we can to the original but really screw it up. Worst part was the ending. They should never have added the commentary
The end music is so Beautiful the car chase the voice hard so explain just makes me want to see my dad agen he went to heaven in 2017 so I miss him so much thank you for your time
he should know better than trying to use a shotgun out a charger's window, never ends well
Just ask the bad guys in Bullitt! Their last gas station visit ended pretty badly!
BTW, the badass driving the Charger in "Bullitt" was the same badass driving the Bonneville in "The Seven-Ups" chase.
bill hickman... a legend. I'll always remember the face on his passenger in the chase in that movie, a look of total stunned awe and a good bit of fear as he whipped that whale through traffic in what had to have been a pants-shitting experience no matter how much choreography was involved (he gets the credit for that too because he was also the choreographer). I could never tell how much of that face was real, but seeing the driving I believe there wasn't any acting involved.
+Bob Joe Especially on those 4-wheel temporary spares.
And yet the Challenger didn't suddenly turn into a Camaro when it hit the bulldozers like it did in the original.
Oh, the reboot of Vanishing Point.
Not THEE Vanishing Point.
Big difference.
I love the original Vanishing Point, as it portrays something of the nihilism of late Vietnam-era US culture with Barry Newman and a white Challenger on the road to nowhere. This remake was so godawful that I was rooting for the bulldozers...
Original movie...
Kowalski chose the bulldozers. They were the vanishing point of his life. The whole movie was a series of flashbacks on Kowalski's life that began and ended with the bulldozers.
A *man* living his life on his own terms and ending it the same way.
A MEN.............................
Oh God, please take me back to the 70's.
Bail out at 180 miles, we need mythbusters
Good compilation of old and new mixed together. The original was 1971 of course. Enjoyed this one. In the real movie, the car that hit the bulldozers was a Camaro.
Do you know why they used a Camaro?
I heard the Challengers (4) were lent by Chrysler to make the movie. The studio had to return them after production was finished.
Actually the original Vanishing Point the Challengers were 1970's not '71's. There were multiple ones, I believe 4. The cars were loaned/leased to them to make the movie and had to return them when done filming. Therefore they toed a stripped '67 Camaro into the bulldozers.
+pmkrak So 4 people ended up with gently driven 70 Challengers. The ending is impressive as hell, much better than CGI. I got to do an Alinement on a 70 Challenger 440/Pistol grip 4speed in 1989 or so and it was ALOT faster than I expected.
"Do you know why they used a Camaro?" To keep us Mopar fans from rioting and tearing the theater apart.
Nowhere near as good as the original film in the 70's
I watched this movie when I was in the Army in 1975. It was one the most traumatic car movies that I had ever seen .....
If you saw it in 1975, you saw the classy 1971 original. This is the shitty 1997 remake.
60-70's Charger/Challenger is the most bad ass cars ever built!
A tragic shame, the destruction of two classic mopars
The remake is no where as good as the original.
Yes the Original is better for sure but the remake was not bad in my opinion better then a lot of remade movies that's for sure
What’s with the instant replay? It’s annoying.
This is the last year of the Dodge V-8's: get 'em while you still can!
Great video and had to watch it again.
old skool chargers and challengers. it doesn't get any better than this.
Haha! "Hit those bulldozers at over 180mph." My ass... That challenger would be the size of a super sub-compact car if it did that. Not to mention the bulldozers would be seriously hurting.
Original Vanishing Point was better - several cars destroyed in film. No computer graphics. Very dangerous all real stunts.
No CGI in this one either, just some fire added at the end. Real cars, purpose-built.
One dead scum-maro at the end.
6:12 I can imagine this is what it's like for a driver in the miniature hotwheels car when you crash them off the track.
I've always hated the movies for destroying old muscle cars !
That barrel roll in the sheriff's Charger. That's why we wear seat belts.
The extra double takes in the uploaders editing killed this.
The original Vanishing Point is so much better. In the original production the Challenger is really hauling ass...not a camera trick, or done in editing, the car is truly going extremely fast. This version of that great movie is cheezy. You wanna see a great flick, and some badass driving...search for the original. Fortunately Gone in 60 seconds was redone with taste and a great cast...The original, for it's day still kicks ass...but as a fan of that movie since it was debuted, my hat's off to Mr. Cage, and co-stars!
wilco.
the Angel waiting always gets me bad
Thank u fer the share.
750 HP will make anything go fast
not a diesel locomotive.
Gordon Music the original hellcats.
Except for a Prius and a Geo Metro
+Josh Banks Or a concrete truck....
Beep
This sounds is music for my ears
Rip to a camaro and an 68 charger, when the car exploded the wheels turned into five spoke cragars
"Takes a Mopar to catch a Mopar" 😉😎🐦
This isn't the Vanishing Point I remember .. must be a remake.
Clip was interesting but in no way is this even close to the original.
Damn, here I am, thinking this is the original movie, and I see Viggo.
Thats the dude from "A history of violence"
I can’t believe they wrecked that Charger like that...like, STOP 🛑
They are killin old cars for movies
I saw this in 1997 when I was 8 on fox 53
First movie was better,good movie
Makes me want to rewatch DeathProof again!!
This one is ok.The original better.
I hate seeing classic muscle cars going to waste....ugh.
This was made in '97, during the first wave of musclecar nostalgia. Cars were a big part of the budget.
Acting didn't show up for the remake.
Speed doesn't kill. It's the sudden stops that get ya.
I saw the original. Have not bothered watching the remake. On a side note, raced a superB w/ the 440 interceptor against my 455-at 90 going on 100 mph - he looked at me, smiled, and just WALKED AWAY from my damn 455 like it was nothing!!!!
Pissed me off big time, but what the hell.
I love car chase movies, real car chase movies from before , nowadays they're mostly cgi car chases.
this movie is one of the best for studying the sediments laid down then washed away during the stages of The Flood about 4,360 years ago.
Dodge Charger one of my favourite cars of all time.. along with Del boy and Rodney's TIT van and the Oldsmobile from the Blues Bro's..
I flipped a car going that fast once…it was a 1995 Honda Del Sol Si with a Honda 2.2L H22A4 DOHC VTEC swapped in _(which came available after a family friend’s 1997 Honda Prelude got rolled over by a giant construction vehicle, so, the shop where the car ended up & deemed it a _total loss_ called my dad, I was making tons of money doing graphic design, web programming & I bought the motor for $2700, used the 5-speed which was already in the car (as far as I know)…
I was racing it against my best friend since second grade who was in a 1997 Mitsubishi Eclipse GSX…I have no physical memory of the crash or the summer surrounding that accident, I remember waking up in a Hospital Bed , the girl who’d been me secretary all that summer lying in the hospital bed with a nylon net around it, and I remember she was crying, hugging me, I had no idea what was going on…
So, what was wrong with the original film that it had to be re-made Badly?
all those pinnacles in the area show that many millions of tons of wet sediments flowed away in the years after The Flood about 4,350 years ago.
I absolutely HATE Hollywood for what they've done to so many beautiful cars. Such a waste.
Love the channel, I am subscribed to it, but, is there any particular reason why all the Mopars in these movies get wiped out? Lol!!!l
Proud to say I owned one of each only my Charger was a 1970 also
That's cool mine was a 73 and a 73 charger 69 super Bee 383 4 speed 69 Coronet 440 got to love them mopars 🍀get R done 😎✌️ oh yeah 74 power wagon and a 100 3-speed column shift and now 2019 ram classic two-door square box 5.7 hemi 🥳
I like this better than original. Because acting was better. I LOVE CHARGERS and Challengers I owned a 2015 hemi challenger
So the Challenger hits the buckets of two front end loaders at 185 mph and they don't budge. Considering the force of the impact would have destroyed everything in sight, should have just done it.
IIRC, in the original version it was a monstrous great Caterpillar, a D9 or something of the like.
Movie magic.
LoL... Yeah he jumped out of the car moving at 185 mph.... And survived..... LMAO 😂.... Nope...
I think Viggo Mortenson is a better actor than Barry Newman, but I don't think this remake was better than the original.
Saw the original at 11 yrs old. My grandmother bought the tickets for a "car" movie. Can't watch this version.
Is that Aragorn ?
Skodz Gaming yes
Yeah, he's ridin' like a different kind of Ranger here!
MOTHERFUCKER 7LIVES VIGGO !!!... YEAH !!!
If the car was doing anything over 40 mph, the blades would've caused the front end to rise and the car probably woulda flipped backwards, after the motor exited the front end through the space between the blades.
The only way that car could ever do 185 is if you drove it off a cliff.
1971 at the CHP Academy, a donor 1969 Superbird with a 440x6, hit 183 MPH on the track. The Hemi models were said to do over 200 MPH on the track.
An honest 150.....maybe. Even then the aerodynamics would cause so much positive pressure under the car that it would lose all stability.
your face would
No way 185 mph aerodynamics of this car good for 150 max
Richard Petty would beg to differ!
IT TAKES A MOPAR TO CATCH A MOPAR ! HELL YEAHHHH
Huh. So he bailed out at 185! mph in front of an assembly of blinded law enforcement officers. How ... interesting.
Mike VanIn - - only ending that could have been worse: The Angel takes him away like in the ending of "The Crow", ha-ha.
Boy howdy at 185 his body would fling apart like being put in a blender
He climbed in the ashtray to escape the inferno.
First a 68 charger then a 70 challenger, why?!?!?!?!?!?!?!
To watch this when you need double vision you're going to see everything in double
Decent engine sounds. May actually be Mopar engine's. I made the mistake of reading the comment thread. Most of them made me loose a little more faith in humanity. Wow
Some movies should never be remade...this was one of them!!!
Sexy cars though!!
"Much damage?"
"You should see the damage, bronze!"
Bro me dolió mucho cuando los autos se volteaban y se estrellaban y lo que más me dolió fue que el Hemi Challenger RT 340 se haiga explotado Bro
Had a 73 Challenger💪 I guess he did too 😆 sure miss mine 🍀get R done 😎✌️
180mph for a stock challenger ...er..ok. prefer the original left more to the imagination
Saw this film when in Junior High...cool
How are they taking the arial shots if there’s no “chopper”?
I can't wait for the remake of this movie. I will bet they F__k it up with a new Dodge Charger instead of a cool car like the Challenger ... Any body else want to take a bet on what car they use for the remake of 2019
You know that this version was a remake, right? But if they want to screw up another sorry ass remake, why not go for broke and use a Challenger Demon? And I actually like the current 4 door Charger; Australia had 4 door muscle cars for years, plus the Charger still has the power to back up the name. I remember when Dodge brought out a derivative of the Omni 024 front drive sporty coupe and called it a Charger too. The little 2.2 was decently peppy, and the Shelby Chargers were surprisingly quick, particularly with the Shelby GLH-S turbo engine. Besides, the best reason to not hate the four door Charger is that without it, the Challenger wouldn't exist at all. Underneath the body, they are the same car, so one way to look at the Challenger is as the two door version of the Charger with different bodywork.
Cripple Bitchin the new challenger doesn't even have chrome.
I hope they use a fucking Tesla and destroy it. LOL!
They can't re-make the original...The sensibilities are different.The world is different. Who would believe any car could evade capture across multiple states in today's advanced technology world
Jose Brown - - yeppers, the Native Americans lost a bit of freedom with creation of barbed wire fences, highways & rail lines. Today's Americans lost a bit of freedom from 2-way radios & aircraft monitoring. But I still like to push the envelope in my '16 Challenger SXT - - sadly, too much traffic even on the highway has only allowed me to get to 112 (so far).