What Brazil's Twitter/X Ban Says About Free Speech

Поділитися
Вставка
  • Опубліковано 29 лис 2024

КОМЕНТАРІ • 871

  • @terryh5334
    @terryh5334 Місяць тому +90

    Left is Left...why are we surprised. We need to watch out!!!!

  • @BoBothecurious
    @BoBothecurious Місяць тому +513

    Anyone who tells you they need to limit your speech, in order to protect YOU, is not acting in your best interest. Never in history has the group trying to sensor and restrict been the group that was looking to "do what's best".

    • @infiniteworfare5089
      @infiniteworfare5089 Місяць тому

      haha jonathan haidt just went ahead and ban phones in schools. eventually phones will be banned overall because jonathan haidt gets triggered when people are happy on their phones. so there will basically be no social media left.

    • @MyANTHEMS
      @MyANTHEMS Місяць тому

      You're simply a fool. Think more

    • @Windrake101
      @Windrake101 Місяць тому

      Remember that in regards to project 2025. And all future talk regarding abortion and p***

    • @luc3217
      @luc3217 Місяць тому

      Since elon took over there is more censorship

    • @luc3217
      @luc3217 Місяць тому +8

      Maybe not the wisest the a man with so many international interests to run a social media platform

  • @funkeyfreddy
    @funkeyfreddy Місяць тому +169

    I love Brazil but their government sucks

    • @EMB1199
      @EMB1199 Місяць тому

      It does, im Brazilian, they are all corrupt and they keep being elected because the majority of Brazilian people are just very poor and simple-minded people, just want to survive day after day, and have no perspective for the future.

    • @douglasfernandes5801
      @douglasfernandes5801 29 днів тому

      You north americans dont know even how to vote, what shit of presidents do you have trough the history and even them do your people like to talk shit about other countries. Go elect Trump, is gonna be funny see from here.

    • @nailer10
      @nailer10 27 днів тому +18

      our corrent president sucks. How can a guy be in JAIL, leave, AND BECOME PRESIDENT. Its just out of this world.

    • @EMB1199
      @EMB1199 27 днів тому +10

      @nailer10 with a little help from the Supreme court judges and the naivety of the more simple people

    • @DJAraRealSalsa
      @DJAraRealSalsa 27 днів тому

      @@EMB1199 And with a little bit of help from Joe Biden's State Department and the CIA who in turn answer to the United Nations and the World Economic Forum, who in turn answer to the most powerful bankers and corporations on the planet! ;)

  • @igorlopes4402
    @igorlopes4402 29 днів тому +38

    Im brazilian and last years made me fell like im on a TV show. pure dystopian

  • @gravityawsome
    @gravityawsome Місяць тому +202

    "Democratic socialism"
    Lmaoooooo

    • @luc3217
      @luc3217 Місяць тому +16

      That is very common in Europe

    • @luc3217
      @luc3217 Місяць тому +18

      Where they do have healthcare , cheap education and good infrastructure

    • @freeottis
      @freeottis Місяць тому +16

      @@luc3217and high taxes

    • @luc3217
      @luc3217 Місяць тому +13

      @@freeottis Yes especially the rich, not for low income

    • @Kozycz
      @Kozycz Місяць тому +17

      @@luc3217there is no low income, everyones broke, except for the government

  • @c.e.o.almeida
    @c.e.o.almeida Місяць тому +11

    You have to understand that the legal system here in Brasil is different. It is called "Civil Law", and it derives from "Roman Law". In this system, we have almost all of our rules defined by law, and not by judges or courts. That being said, our constitution establishes "levels" of rights. The higher level, that we call the "fundamental rights", include amongst them the free speech and some rights about dignity, honor and image. They are of the same level. So, you can understand that, when someone is being racist or xenophobic, or even defending the nazy party, they are confronting the rights to dignity, image and honor of a certain group of people. That, generally, is not tolerated. And it has nothing to do with freedom of speech, but with using the freedom that you were given to inflict damage to someone else. That cannot happen in the physical world neither on the internet (social media).

    • @alyssondasilva4484
      @alyssondasilva4484 Місяць тому +1

      a liberdade de expressão serve pra proteger justamente o discurso polêmico e contencioso. Liberdade de expressão sendo limitada por ofensa não serve pra nada, porque ofensa é totalmente subjetivo, e qualquer um pode se ofender (ou se fingir ofendido) por qualquer coisa

    • @mclovinrisco
      @mclovinrisco 24 дні тому

      ​@@alyssondasilva4484ofensa não è subjetivo. tu nao pode discursar sobre nazismo e achar que é relativo

    • @magnum-freire
      @magnum-freire 24 дні тому

      @@alyssondasilva4484 Basta mudar o tema de nazismo para comunismo que verás o discurso dessa gente dar um cavalo de pau de 180 graus para a liberdade de expressão. Esse é o problema do país, querem dor nó em pingo d'água defendendo o indefensável pq é conveniente, todos que apontam as incoerências e até ilegalidades são rotulados de inimigos da cruzada ideológica/política... No futuro fingirão que não falaram ou escreveram todas essas barbaridades, só o tempo há de curar, não tem jeito.

  • @georgeluiz6998
    @georgeluiz6998 23 дні тому +1

    They talked on and on and in no moment have they mentioned the real reason why X was banned. it had nothing to do with sensorship, whatsoever.

  • @rabbitgames1971
    @rabbitgames1971 Місяць тому +10

    One of the things I wish people were more educated on is understanding the difference between a Social Program and a Socialist Govt.

  • @Luccasgio
    @Luccasgio Місяць тому +46

    This guy knows so much about Brasil, more than the majority of journalists here.

  • @matt-i3r6w
    @matt-i3r6w Місяць тому +65

    Get Trump on!

  • @andrewroberthook3310
    @andrewroberthook3310 Місяць тому +29

    The public has grown a brain
    Now the shit will hit the fan

  • @dominick253
    @dominick253 Місяць тому +75

    The first thing they will do is shut the internet off.
    If the internet goes out for everyone you know it's about to happen.

    • @Balboainc
      @Balboainc Місяць тому

      What's about to happen lmfao anything they wanted to do to us they can already do without shutting off the Internet. If anything they already did it and your dumbass is still on step 1 trying to figure out what they're going to do.

    • @jason-hu9fe
      @jason-hu9fe Місяць тому

      The internet going down might be great for humanity!

    • @mixedmama
      @mixedmama Місяць тому +4

      Good

    • @CsondesMateHUN
      @CsondesMateHUN Місяць тому +7

      I'll believe when I see it. This is just another story of fearmongering I keep hearing about for many years now

    • @Anders-vl6kk
      @Anders-vl6kk Місяць тому +3

      take your meds

  • @brunogrande9826
    @brunogrande9826 24 дні тому +10

    You guys know nothing about Brazil`s laws. The law specifically says that any company must have legal representation to exist in Brazil, X fired all their legal team and after 5 or 6 warnings they got banned until they renamed a legal team again and paid the fines. I understand that in the US it might be different, but every country has their own laws and you gotta respect law.

    • @magnum-freire
      @magnum-freire 24 дні тому +3

      So can you tell me where BlueSky's legal representation is in Brazil? There is none, right?! Even so, BlueSky was promoted as the government's alternative to X in Brazil.

    • @enricoorsi9751
      @enricoorsi9751 24 дні тому

      Wtf, the government has nothing to do with bluesky​@@magnum-freire

    • @fabiogoncalves7675
      @fabiogoncalves7675 23 дні тому +4

      ​@@magnum-freire There has been a legal representative of bluesky in Brazil since the middle of this year

    • @onesmileybaldy8303
      @onesmileybaldy8303 23 дні тому

      No,it does not,quit spreading misinformation. That law is only applies when the company wants to start a BUSINESS here,that’s why so many other social medias (like Bluesky) don’t have representative here. Why do they not do anything about that one? Well,the answer is quite obvious lol
      But disregarding all of that, Mr.Egghead’s demands to censor accounts is ILLEGAL. We call it “prior censorship” or something like that,it’s the act of shutting someone up before they even have a chance to say anything. So unconstitutional demands should not be followed,period.
      You guys always conveniently leave out the part that makes you undeniably wrong. It’s always the same weak argument…

    • @onesmileybaldy8303
      @onesmileybaldy8303 23 дні тому +1

      Doesn’t matter,Mr.Egghead’s demands to censor accounts is ILLEGAL. We call it “prior censorship” or something like that,it’s the act of shutting someone up before they even have a chance to say anything. So unconstitutional demands should not be followed,period.
      You guys always conveniently leave out the part that makes you undeniably wrong. It’s always the same weak argument…

  • @AndreCarneiro666
    @AndreCarneiro666 24 дні тому +2

    Try giving your "opinion" by defaming a judge in US and see what happens.

  • @adrianamanzoni3080
    @adrianamanzoni3080 Місяць тому +21

    "Free speech was always a left-wing thing" Sure! We all know that the Soviet Union was all about free speech just like Cuba, North Korea, etc.
    This is what happens when you don't know basic history.

    • @adamdarrow
      @adamdarrow Місяць тому +6

      He knows way more than you. He was taking about in the context of the US.

    • @adrianamanzoni3080
      @adrianamanzoni3080 Місяць тому +3

      @@adamdarrow You clearly haven't read my reply or don't understand it, but it's ok.
      Vote left and enjoy! I have no doubts it'll do wonders for the US. 😃👍

    • @absolutesemen
      @absolutesemen Місяць тому

      Dude the christian right has always been the proponents of censorship in America. Since the Puritans landed here thats been their goal. Against rock n roll, against rap music, against anything non-white/Christian really. Censorship and restriction of language and expression was always a conservative value until it shifted to a progressive value in the 2000s, but it's always just been about shutting people up you don't agree with. ​@adrianamanzoni3080

    • @brunopalhano4087
      @brunopalhano4087 29 днів тому

      That's right. These people are biased as fuck.

    • @direitosautorais5388
      @direitosautorais5388 24 дні тому +2

      eles associam o liberalismo com a esquerda, como se fosse a mesma coisa. Bom, aqui no Brasil não é nem um pouco assim. Aqui a esquerda é realmente socialista, e a direita é conservadora ou liberal.

  • @liammoore1720
    @liammoore1720 Місяць тому +210

    Getting society to argue over if it’s the Left or Right censoring each other only serves to hide the fact that censorship is a CLASS issue

    • @jmtolerico
      @jmtolerico Місяць тому +10

      Yeah I don't agree with that

    • @liammoore1720
      @liammoore1720 Місяць тому +6

      @@jmtolerico I don’t care if you agree or not it’s the truth.. the more people point fingers politically the less control we have over censorship from the media landscape as a whole

    • @mb-kh2nb
      @mb-kh2nb Місяць тому

      ​@liammoore1720 the left went to social media and had them censor
      Kamala has threatened to censor Twitter
      No recent conservative strives to do that

    • @jmtolerico
      @jmtolerico Місяць тому

      @@liammoore1720 That's something I can get on board with

    • @TheEyeDefy
      @TheEyeDefy Місяць тому +2

      ​@@jmtolerico what if I told you it doesn't actually matter who you vote for? The outcomes 'they' want will happen regardles of which side of the coin is in power.

  • @pedrofrutuoso1389
    @pedrofrutuoso1389 23 дні тому +6

    it's amazing how NO AMERICAN can TRY, only TRY, to understand others perspectives... they're right and thats the end of it. Twitter wasn't "censored" in Brazil, we also have a constitution and laws, our Supreme Court asked Twitter to block some accounts (they were involved in the coup d'etat attempt that happened here in 2023) and have a representative in our country (because they closed the Brazilian office, according to law you can only operate in Brazil having a representative ON the country, it can be only one individual, but it must be in Brazil), Twitter didn't followed those policies, the Supreme Court even said "hey, do what we asked you or we'll block it", they didn't followed again. So it was blocked, fair and square. Ask yourselves what'd you do if a foreign company didn't followed your laws and constitution... and by the way, the American interpretation of free speech is NOT the only interpretation in the world, it is actually pretty unique, only your constitution guarantees people can say whatever they want. In Brazil you're not allowed to make racist, homophobic, transphobic and/or nazi speech, you'd be in jail for that or pay fees, as many other countries in world. If you wanna say "if that is true, then Brazil has no free speech", it is ok, I respect it, but you should respect our perspective too.

  • @MartyMcTube
    @MartyMcTube Місяць тому +284

    Censorship is a ruling class thing, not a left/right thing.

    • @williammasters1620
      @williammasters1620 Місяць тому +37

      Yeah but it's became a left thing now

    • @liammoore1720
      @liammoore1720 Місяць тому +18

      @@williammasters1620it didn’t “become” anything did you watch the video? It’s been both sides throughout history but it’s always been the ruling classes limiting the population

    • @marchuitt
      @marchuitt Місяць тому

      Well, vast majority of it is coming from one side of the aisle - one that has a compliant media that has no problem labeling true information as cheapfakes, deepfakes, disinformation, misinformation - all while screaming bigot! fascist! racist! (on and on, the demonization they engage in). And it isn't the Right.

    • @darwinawardcommittee
      @darwinawardcommittee Місяць тому

      @@williammasters1620
      Yeah, that’s why republican Governor Ron DeSantis is currently threatening tv stations with prosecution for running ads favoring the abortion rights legislation. That’s why he went after Disney for speaking out against their fascist laws.
      That’s why trump wants to strengthen libel laws so he can sue. He sues people all the time for speech but he loses.

    • @liberateyourslack
      @liberateyourslack Місяць тому

      ​@@williammasters1620 was the video too long for you? TLDW; you're a sucker too

  • @priscilaapamorim
    @priscilaapamorim 25 днів тому +1

    As a Brazilian this is just so frustrating, but the system it is all corrupt, all of them should be in jail 🤯

  • @ericyabadabadoo
    @ericyabadabadoo 28 днів тому +1

    Twitter isn't blocked anymore. Not to mention "freedom of speech" is an American thing.

    • @zephyrr108
      @zephyrr108 27 днів тому

      Freedom.of speech is in Brazil constitution. Not on the same level as the American one. But it is there. Stop lying.

    • @davidduarte1269
      @davidduarte1269 26 днів тому +1

      Different than in the US freedom of speech in Brazil doesn't mean freedom without consequences ​@@zephyrr108

  • @JavraK.Z.L
    @JavraK.Z.L Місяць тому +19

    I came here to inform you that Twitter has now been unblocked here in Brazil.

    • @fvardona
      @fvardona Місяць тому

      Unblocked after having to kneel to Alexandre’s unconstitutional demands.

    • @guirenault22
      @guirenault22 Місяць тому +5

      It doesn’t change anything

    • @fvardona
      @fvardona Місяць тому +8

      im here to say they only allowed to be unblocked after complying to the unconstitucional demands of the Tribunal.

    • @MrTome1975
      @MrTome1975 Місяць тому +13

      After Brazil's supreme court imposed millionaire fines on Starlink just because Elon Musk holds shares of both, X and Starlink, despite the fact that they are completely different companies. That's the level of dystopia and totalitarianism currently occurring in Brazil.

    • @douglasfernandes5801
      @douglasfernandes5801 29 днів тому

      @@MrTome1975 Bolsonaristas pagadores de pau de americano em todo lugar, que maravilha. Eles vão eleger o trump, eles não gostam de de você, eles te chamam de lixo, eles querem a sua morte, por mais branquinho e do olho claro e com alguma graninha no seu bolso, você ainda não passa de um latino de merda.

  • @jeffraines414
    @jeffraines414 Місяць тому +35

    I have never "loved" anything of the left...

    • @Windrake101
      @Windrake101 Місяць тому +1

      So no freedom of speech?
      How about freedom of religion?

    • @jeffraines414
      @jeffraines414 Місяць тому +3

      @@Windrake101 Well if you consider, John Adams, James Madison, etc the "Left" then yeah... learn history.....

    • @douglasfernandes5801
      @douglasfernandes5801 29 днів тому

      No problem, we don't like the right too. The history gonna do the rest.

    • @jeffraines414
      @jeffraines414 29 днів тому

      @@douglasfernandes5801 illiterate much special Jack?

    • @dallas2586
      @dallas2586 11 днів тому +1

      @@Windrake101so taking things that originated from predominantly right winged people who accomplished things, calling it “left”, won’t do research or elaborate. Sure sounds like freedom of speech to me buddy. Let’s rewrite more history, any ideas? We can try saying all samurai were black let’s start there. Oh wait.

  • @focusaddiction3460
    @focusaddiction3460 Місяць тому +1

    "You lied to me and it's unnacceptable", imagine saying that about a politician and being surprised about it

  • @PetrosSyrak
    @PetrosSyrak Місяць тому +1

    Thanks for cutting and posting this!

  • @TheZogsvengali
    @TheZogsvengali Місяць тому +26

    you bought into the guy spouting off about "socialism" and "worker's party" and didn't see red flags? Let me guess you drew the line at nationalist?

    • @ringofkaren
      @ringofkaren Місяць тому

      This dude is a complete idiot. He says the left was the side of free speach until recently. He must have missed minor event like the Soviet and Chinese revolution.

  • @mfnemevomitspit
    @mfnemevomitspit 24 дні тому +5

    First, it's important to clarify that Lula, the current president of Brazil, does not oppose freedom of expression. Throughout his political career, he has consistently voiced support for democratic values, which include freedom of speech and the press. He has also made public statements emphasizing the importance of free discourse as a core part of Brazilian democracy. His government hasn’t taken any steps to limit individuals' right to express themselves, which remains protected under the Brazilian Constitution.
    Regarding social media, particularly platforms like Twitter, any potential temporary restrictions or discussions around regulation are generally aimed at curbing misinformation, hate speech, or coordinated disinformation campaigns rather than silencing individuals or legitimate opinions. Such actions are often rooted in concerns about the social and political impacts of these platforms when they are misused, especially to spread harmful content that can incite violence or harm the democratic process.
    Blocking or limiting access to certain content on social platforms is sometimes proposed as a temporary measure when it can be demonstrated that the content poses a risk to public order or safety. However, this doesn’t mean Lula’s government supports generalized censorship. Instead, these measures are typically focused on creating responsible digital environments where misinformation and other forms of harmful content can be addressed effectively.
    In short, Lula's position is more about protecting the public from misinformation and hate speech rather than censoring free expression. His government has not enacted policies aimed at general censorship, and Lula himself has not advocated for censorship of lawful, open speech.

    • @germanpenn
      @germanpenn 23 дні тому

      Who defines what "misinformation" is?

    • @mfnemevomitspit
      @mfnemevomitspit 23 дні тому +1

      @@germanpenn false or inaccurate information, especially that which is deliberately intended to deceive.

    • @germanpenn
      @germanpenn 22 дні тому

      @@mfnemevomitspit who defines if something is false or not? At one point everyone was saying covid vaccines prevented contagion, but that was later retracted. Same thing when people said intubation worsened the situation of the patient, and that was later proven to be true. Even in hard science some things are later debunked (quantum non-determinism was criticized by Einstein himself, and later proven to be true). So, again, who defines if something is false? Shouldn't we let people debate, give their opinions, and educate them so that they are not easily deceived? If truth is a google search away, why censor a comment instead of telling the people to check their sources? And if it's not a google search away because it's not that easy, but a debatable and complex matter, why censor a comment? People should be responsible of every consequence generated by what they say, but they should always be allowed to say it. Otherwise you give the government the power to decide what's true and what's not, and if you know about history, you'll realize that never, ever, ended well.

    • @mfnemevomitspit
      @mfnemevomitspit 21 день тому

      @germanpenn anyone who knows the truth, mr chat gpt

    • @rererep1109
      @rererep1109 12 днів тому

      Dude you don’t want the government dictating that. I know of at least 50 times in the last 2 years that misinformation came out as true. I think what you are talking about is malinformation, which is even worse because if we don’t have all the information to make an informed decision how tf are we gonna have a democracy

  • @motormatt1222
    @motormatt1222 Місяць тому +27

    It’s now so easy to see which side is for evil and which side is right.

    • @nandohenriques2975
      @nandohenriques2975 Місяць тому +6

      Correct. The side for the greater good is not the side of the billionaires.

  • @renatodumaresq
    @renatodumaresq 28 днів тому +1

    Politics are based on two pillars: demagogy and hypocrisy. Everything else comes from this.

  • @NoMoreMeansWeHaveHadEnough
    @NoMoreMeansWeHaveHadEnough Місяць тому +3

    The court got many things wrong, liable should be allowed

  • @Stephen-fe8bq
    @Stephen-fe8bq Місяць тому +4

    Elon buying TWIT saved America 🇺🇸 😃

  • @budaraivoso
    @budaraivoso Місяць тому +2

    what chnaged in brasil? not much, his ignorance about brasil changed, thats pretty much it.

    • @zephyrr108
      @zephyrr108 27 днів тому

      You are just a leftie. Cry harder

  • @alfredospautzgranemannjuni5864
    @alfredospautzgranemannjuni5864 24 дні тому

    He’s on point about Brazil. The state brags about being a democracy, but doesn’t allow you to say a plethora of things that are mostly to benefit groups spouses by the left.

  • @peperoni3140
    @peperoni3140 28 днів тому +1

    meanwhile, Trump: "The press is the enemy!"

  • @ThiagoOliveira-ph3vo
    @ThiagoOliveira-ph3vo 24 дні тому +5

    the man says "the nazi party os banned in Brazil" then goes on a rant about how good the radicalism of the american constitution like "yeah, don't you love when we let nazi free to try and take over?" that is so funny man lol

  • @Keenan716
    @Keenan716 Місяць тому +2

    man u can tell YT censored tf outta this video

  • @jasonscott5932
    @jasonscott5932 Місяць тому +6

    Those that want to put the boot on others are bad people.

    • @televishenimoniker5546
      @televishenimoniker5546 Місяць тому

      To play dev'ls advocate: How do you interpret a leader like Bukele in El Salvador? He has dealt with horrendous gang/satanic criminals with a very heavy hand/boot. Are there exceptions in certain situations?

    • @wardy4903
      @wardy4903 Місяць тому

      ​@@televishenimoniker5546were talking about free speech, not gang members in Venezuela.

    • @televishenimoniker5546
      @televishenimoniker5546 Місяць тому +2

      @@wardy4903 I didn't know "put the boot on others" was specific to free speech.

  • @tomchristian9932
    @tomchristian9932 Місяць тому +1

    It’s about, power, control and money, and staying in power!

  • @kadenkelsch4487
    @kadenkelsch4487 Місяць тому +4

    Joe, please have Trump on your podcast

  • @daulken
    @daulken Місяць тому +24

    A lot of government powers sound like a great idea until you ask "Who do we trust with this power?"
    If the answer isn't people who vehemently disagree with you (and it never is), the government should NOT be given that power.

    • @TheSilverPhoenix100
      @TheSilverPhoenix100 Місяць тому

      It's amazing how people are so happy to give more power to the government when it's their side calling...not understanding that it is subject to change very quickly and suddenly you're on the outside.

    • @TheSilverPhoenix100
      @TheSilverPhoenix100 Місяць тому

      @bschmidt1 and how is socialism anything but the ultra elite having absolute control over everything ? Every instance of it being attempted becomes exactly that

  • @sunofbry
    @sunofbry Місяць тому +3

    If Elon cares about free speech so much, why isn’t he riding for TikTok?

    • @10oner
      @10oner Місяць тому

      Cuz tiktok is 🏳️‍🌈 and ruined every generation born after 95, soft as hell. Go watch your little dances and stay off rogan

    • @zephyrr108
      @zephyrr108 27 днів тому

      Tuktok is crap

    • @sunofbry
      @sunofbry 26 днів тому

      @@zephyrr108 Ok.

  • @adamdarrow
    @adamdarrow Місяць тому +1

    “How is Bill Gates part of this conversation” and how is Elon Musk part of this conversation?

  • @Wizzy678
    @Wizzy678 Місяць тому +26

    Aand when the us bans tiktok its normal figure that out ! Im not even on tiktok but its so hypocritical..

    • @sleep8646
      @sleep8646 Місяць тому +8

      The US didn't ban TikTok. Maybe you should read past the headlines of articles.

    • @tonywpiche2263
      @tonywpiche2263 Місяць тому +1

      It is not banned (yet). They cannot back door monitor and control it.

    • @nandohenriques2975
      @nandohenriques2975 Місяць тому

      Brazil only banned Twitter after firing literally everyone in the brazilian Twitter office and ignoring the demands of the Federal Court to send representation.

    • @gnarwhal7562
      @gnarwhal7562 Місяць тому +1

      That one's a literal more complex. The bill to ban TikTok was motivated more by national security reasons than by censorship, (as TikTok is a Chinese owned company, which basically means the CCP collects data on users). I'm not saying it's right or wrong to ban TikTok, but it's not really about censorship

    • @nandohenriques2975
      @nandohenriques2975 Місяць тому +3

      @@gnarwhal7562 In Brazil the ban also wasn't about censorship. Elon Musk had taken out any and all legal representation he had here in Brazil, which is something every single company needs to have to function.

  • @LuizFernandoTL
    @LuizFernandoTL 20 днів тому

    Free speech is in the USA constitution. That's it. For example, if someone says a racist phrase in Brazil, man, it's a big problem. It's not USA here. We have our history, our issues and the laws we have in Brazil came from demands of our society, not from a USA point of view. It's simple to understand.

  • @TheBostonboy95
    @TheBostonboy95 Місяць тому +11

    Didn’t Joe want TikTok banned?

    • @MrTbager1
      @MrTbager1 Місяць тому +10

      Shhh… that doesn’t fit the agenda

    • @Editionsz
      @Editionsz Місяць тому +5

      Because it was shown to be Chinese malware, I think he may have said something like that

    • @Editionsz
      @Editionsz Місяць тому +2

      @@MrTbager1looking through your comments on UA-cam your brain looks like a sad place to exist.

    • @anthonyveltri2994
      @anthonyveltri2994 Місяць тому

      @@Editionsz how can you see his comments?

    • @ThomasBrenton-pk8gg
      @ThomasBrenton-pk8gg Місяць тому +10

      As for TikTok, it’s a way for Chinese government to collect your personal data/credit info. The US wants to be the only country that does that to its own citizens I guess.

  • @railguy2518
    @railguy2518 Місяць тому +1

    He's missing a level of abstraction. It's not about populism inherently; they're willing to use populism if helps them. It's about maintaining their power. They have all the power right now: bureacracy, justice, media, culture. The results of their power haven't been great, hence the populism against them. But its all about keeping their power.

  • @rererep1109
    @rererep1109 12 днів тому

    Lula is a terrible president that should still be in jail I swear we are living in idiocracy

  • @onebluestone1
    @onebluestone1 Місяць тому

    I'm watching UA-cam and notice practically no Joe Rogan video suggestions. Somebody might be shadowbanning someone.

  • @AK-ne4og
    @AK-ne4og Місяць тому

    The NGO industrial complex has major incentives to maintain the mass migration movement and censorship. Most of the money directed to NGOs does not reach the actual subjects in need. Most is used to pay huge salaries, contractors and to buy further power

  • @Lee_BuU
    @Lee_BuU Місяць тому +2

    When was Twitter a benchmark for free speech 😂 lol ...yall too gullible

  • @TT-iu1uq
    @TT-iu1uq Місяць тому +29

    As a Brazilian, this information is incredibly misleading. It's not censorship, Elon wouldn't pay the fines and took the legal representative out of the country, it's that simple, now that he followed our request, it's not banned anymore. That brings another interesting discussion about the NORTH AMERICAN concept of free speech is you see it as a universal value, that should be followed ipsis litteris in every country. YOU have exceptions that you came to the conclusion would be worth censoring someone's "speech" call to action, etc. Here in Brazil, we came to our own conclusions on what free speech is and should be, YOUR values were not constructed by "God" and are not universal, therefore shouldn't be imposed on another country. This idea that Anything but the NORTH AMERICAN concept is censoring is dumb and ignorant.

    • @Windrake101
      @Windrake101 Місяць тому +5

      True "free speech", whether you choose to define it as "from God" or not, is regardless a universal HUMAN value. It is quite telling when a society has it in practice, it is largely a better country in its people. The US (and Canada) have been having the universal right increasingly revoked over the past several decades, so it's not exactly fair to be holding recent times up as a contrary.

    • @warmleatherette5652
      @warmleatherette5652 Місяць тому +4

      Fines for what?

    • @Patriot-q2t
      @Patriot-q2t Місяць тому

      This is nonsense and strange for a country whose greatest symbol is the Christ the Redeemer statue. The Supreme Court in Brazil is basically a gang operating on corruption not justice (same for our DOJ). The judge Moraes threatened Musk for not censoring content critical of President Lula and seized assets of Spacex as leverage. Lula’s a crook and the CIA helped elect him using their playbook of dirty tricks. I can translate the US Constitution into Portuguese if you’d like. This country was founded on belief in God and in that sense our values are universal. If you believe in censorship, fine. We don’t like it, except for the Democrat Party.

    • @TT-iu1uq
      @TT-iu1uq Місяць тому +5

      @@Windrake101 When I say it isn't "universal," I mean that ideas are shaped by specific cultures. Not all societies reach the same conclusions, so there are no truly universal values. For instance, the United States believes its interpretation of free speech should be adopted by all countries. However, countries like China have their own historical developments and distinct values. Which in my opinion has led them to a development we have never seen.

    • @TT-iu1uq
      @TT-iu1uq Місяць тому

      @@warmleatherette5652 The Supreme Court ordered X to remove profiles that were spreading anti-democratic content, considering them a threat to democracy due to the spread of misinformation. However, Elon Musk not only refused to comply but also decided to shut down X's office in Brazil. This action makes his company ineligible to operate in the country, as Brazilian law requires every company to have a legal representative locally.

  • @dm7232
    @dm7232 Місяць тому +1

    There is no such thing as misinformation! It’s just information…then do your research and decide for yourself…like everything else in life.
    Honestly what is wrong with people? Is it just stupidity or is it really as diabolical as it seems?

  • @euandrecampos
    @euandrecampos 29 днів тому

    Our constitution is like someone inviting you to a party somewhere, and when you arrive at the party you realize that the host is Sean Combs.

  • @giorgiobolzani2207
    @giorgiobolzani2207 Місяць тому

    Be carefull America!
    The same sensor chip is getting close to you too...

  • @tomeboaventura9054
    @tomeboaventura9054 Місяць тому

    Old William Fence has his fingers in everythim. Every. Single. Time.

  • @daniel8leonel
    @daniel8leonel Місяць тому

    Best Podcast❤

  • @RandyB199
    @RandyB199 Місяць тому

    Because he is part of the establishment

  • @TaylorJessicahArts
    @TaylorJessicahArts Місяць тому +1

    If Elon didn't buy Twitter it would have become UA-cam. Sensorship, sensorship, sensorship!

  • @haroldgodwinson4674
    @haroldgodwinson4674 Місяць тому

    As a black woman, who voted for Hillary, I can assure you this man is on the spectrum.

  • @silverflux7698
    @silverflux7698 Місяць тому +2

    What Joe's 'avoidance ' of the world's No.1 issue right now says is... he has become the very opposite... to that which he was loved for !
    Virtues should never be for sale!
    He who pays the piper, calls the tune !

  • @anthonybatissa1417
    @anthonybatissa1417 Місяць тому +1

    saw the thumbnail & thought "Man VINCE McMAHON has lost a lot of muscle"

  • @rogcanal
    @rogcanal 24 дні тому

    Bring Allan dos Santos or Paulo Figueiredo

  • @anamarx818
    @anamarx818 26 днів тому

    We need help! God, please, save Brazil!

  • @jopo7996
    @jopo7996 Місяць тому +84

    Brazil removed the ban, after they had Elon swear he'd never sell a goofy Cybertruck there.

  • @sheldonarmstrong9296
    @sheldonarmstrong9296 Місяць тому +1

    It’s a class issue…since the days of kings and peasants…it’s them vs us…as it always has been.

  • @iquevirtual
    @iquevirtual Місяць тому

    Who needs X to say what's on their mind? Who needs a social network?

  • @luc3217
    @luc3217 Місяць тому +3

    Populism is what was popular in 1935 in Germany

    • @barnabusdoyle4930
      @barnabusdoyle4930 Місяць тому

      Populists are people who want to improve the lives of the working classes over the elites. This is why the elites fight populism.

    • @USATheFallen
      @USATheFallen Місяць тому

      And it was great until ppl tried to save the nose 🐽 people

  • @igorumstremantigo
    @igorumstremantigo 25 днів тому

    The problem with lula and the PT is they begin revolutionary and became neo liberal

  • @oddassembler
    @oddassembler Місяць тому +9

    This guy is the Free speech chair of Houston the same way that McDonald's creates a climate change chair to pretend like they take care of that stuff. At rhe end of the day, Israel handles the college free speech

  • @Garrus1995
    @Garrus1995 Місяць тому +24

    Left or right, Latin American countries have always had a rather disturbing love affair with authoritarian regimes.

    • @BerlinghoffRasmussen
      @BerlinghoffRasmussen Місяць тому +1

      It happens when your society is highly regimented.

    • @NobodyHasToAgreeAllTheTime
      @NobodyHasToAgreeAllTheTime Місяць тому +12

      That’s what happens when you have a certain country constantly “regime changing” your countries anytime you elect someone who isn’t convenient for them

    • @Joaopereira-dh3dw
      @Joaopereira-dh3dw Місяць тому

      Is always the quiet ones that get targeted not the ones that says they will terminate the constitution and sue media companies

    • @TopperOFC
      @TopperOFC Місяць тому

      Authoritarian regimes that were initiated by US manipulation to prevent the spread of Soviet influence in South America.

    • @sperry4771
      @sperry4771 Місяць тому

      One might argue, the US has forced a lot of that authoritarian leadership on them. Banana Republics are US backed dictatorships that got were pro united fruit company thus getting the US cheaper fruit. However, my experience in Latin America was the free speech limitations were aimed at extremist groups on both wings.....no Nazis can't march, no the communist party can't march, that kind of thinking, but they do it because those kid of groups were into terrorism, and they are trying to keep solving problems in a civil manner. They still have groups we would consider pretty extreme, marching and speaking freely, just not going to see a group like the Klan.

  • @DanvilleAirsoft
    @DanvilleAirsoft Місяць тому

    Take away the 2nd amendment and the rest all go away too

  • @TT-iu1uq
    @TT-iu1uq Місяць тому +5

    This situation runs much deeper than it appears. Coincidence or not, Brazil has become a major consumer of BYD, one of Tesla’s biggest competitors-a car brand that is actually banned from entering the U.S. to compete with Tesla, a clear case of protectionism. We've seen Elon Musk back a coup in Bolivia, likely due to interests in lithium mining. While his motivations are unclear, it’s not as straightforward as it seems. Musk has complied with similar requests from other countries, like India, to ban certain X profiles. It’s curious that this political crisis unfolds in Brazil just as BYD dominates our car market and shows interest in acquiring lithium mines here.

  • @danielmullaney2069
    @danielmullaney2069 Місяць тому

    Someone needs to silence this man

  • @jimm5251
    @jimm5251 Місяць тому

    you’re gonna to tell me dat you dont know where those people came from? I’m sure if the government didn’t help to blew there whole cities up they would love to live in there homes…

  • @silverknightgundam1196
    @silverknightgundam1196 Місяць тому

    Oh, look, a bunch of American in the video and in the comments who don't understand another country legislation

  • @Ceszinha11
    @Ceszinha11 26 днів тому

    He believed in Lula's word of "Democratic Socialism" LMAO !!!

  • @congola222
    @congola222 28 днів тому +2

    I am Brazilian and i can say, we lost free speech... Brazil is a beautiful country, but it's being hard to live here. Lula is turning our economy into pure garbage! We need help more then ever 😢(sorry if i said something wrong)

  • @69pepe420
    @69pepe420 Місяць тому

    the walls are closing in

  • @garcia202
    @garcia202 Місяць тому +1

    Free speech is standing on a corner and saying whatever you want not typing shyr on a phone

    • @zephyrr108
      @zephyrr108 27 днів тому

      Actually no.

    • @garcia202
      @garcia202 27 днів тому

      @ actually yes. Social media apps are a private company and can do whatever they want. You are free to go stand in the corner and exercise your freedom oslf speech

  • @BroncoKnight34
    @BroncoKnight34 Місяць тому +15

    *GET. TRUMP. ON. ALREADY. JOE.*

    • @liljoe5139
      @liljoe5139 Місяць тому +5

      Makes me wonder if he’s not secretly pulling for Kommie Kamala. Either that or money’s more important.

    • @andrewroberthook3310
      @andrewroberthook3310 Місяць тому +3

      Absolutely

    • @BroncoKnight34
      @BroncoKnight34 Місяць тому +1

      @@liljoe5139i think he’s just afraid because he thinks if he does, he’ll be looped in with the randy quaids, rob schneiders, and james woods’ conservative celebrities.

    • @tulipsontheorgan
      @tulipsontheorgan Місяць тому

      Why is Joe such a coward about having Trump? Afraid the left won’t like him anymore 😮.

    • @Anders-vl6kk
      @Anders-vl6kk Місяць тому +5

      you believe trump would be coherent through an hour or two long podcast?

  • @zenwisdom4259
    @zenwisdom4259 Місяць тому

    let people live the way they want to live. We ought to stop imposing our way of life, thinking, culture, and our corrupt semi-functioning democracy, and political system on others. We often forget that we are a young nation and most countries have been around for thousands of years. They know things that we don't.

  • @dal.890
    @dal.890 Місяць тому

    How u gonna end it on that note? 😭

  • @K4ReeL187
    @K4ReeL187 Місяць тому +1

    8:37 hybrid cyber warfare for regime change

  • @shredlifema9734
    @shredlifema9734 Місяць тому

    Bill gates’ involvement in politics has baffled me, guy just showed up in 2019-20 plugging himself in with no purpose or reasoning

  • @clintmiller88
    @clintmiller88 Місяць тому

    Brazil clearly doesn’t

  • @ethimself5064
    @ethimself5064 Місяць тому +2

    This was rather derailed in nature. Can hardly wait for AI to start running the show. Sone dude once said - You ain't seen nothing yet

    • @marchuitt
      @marchuitt Місяць тому

      Do you remember five years ago, the early AI models that were putting out factual but politically incorrect information? The backlash that it was bigoted, racist? Now look at it, Asian George Washington, Black Joan of Arc, and other such (leftist) idiocracy sort of stuff.

  • @Leorqleo
    @Leorqleo Місяць тому +15

    I mean, the ban itself was pretty legit in terms of legislation and what elon did.
    I am not usually in favour of controlling information, even though we dont have a free speech fetish here in Brazili, but if I had to choose between a govt controlling me what can and can’t be said, or a 50+ year old wannabe bruce wayne controlling what is said, I would always choose the first

    • @Jason-rl7nf
      @Jason-rl7nf Місяць тому +5

      This comment is extremely disturbing.

    • @KingSamSir
      @KingSamSir Місяць тому +1

      you can watch elon slowly losing his sanity

    • @Jason-rl7nf
      @Jason-rl7nf Місяць тому +4

      @@KingSamSir 😭 Wahhhh, Elon likes freedom, Wahhhh. 😭
      That's what you sound like to reasonable adults.

    • @KingSamSir
      @KingSamSir Місяць тому +1

      @@Jason-rl7nfsure thing mr adult

    • @Jason-rl7nf
      @Jason-rl7nf Місяць тому

      @@KingSamSir Don't forget to use that enormous brain of yours, genius.

  • @DannyTillotson
    @DannyTillotson Місяць тому

    Wow that was amazing

  • @damianschelling160
    @damianschelling160 25 днів тому

    Same as USA baning TikTok

  • @bobbyhampton1012
    @bobbyhampton1012 Місяць тому

    Why are we still calling X twitter. This is dumb! Enough already. 🤦🏻‍♂️

  • @masonm600
    @masonm600 Місяць тому

    14:20 how is Bill Gates in this conversation? ... How is Elon Musk in this conversation???

  • @giovannigubani2509
    @giovannigubani2509 Місяць тому

    Whos is theis guy?

  • @tbmike23
    @tbmike23 Місяць тому

    Nothing changed, he was lying the entire time.

  • @mentosfrancomoura9204
    @mentosfrancomoura9204 24 дні тому +2

    Crime its not free speech. Yo guys r mad.

  • @damianschelling160
    @damianschelling160 25 днів тому

    And is funny seing an American talking about a country he don't truly understands

  • @brunocorreagauto9984
    @brunocorreagauto9984 28 днів тому

    Lula was always like this. That's why now I'm in Canada.

  • @kingvulture5730
    @kingvulture5730 Місяць тому

    These people have these meticulous breakdowns of things that were not usable by everyone…especially the 1st amendment…we weren’t even aloud to go to school…with a foundation of hate and racism you can see that people sure talk about these things like they are ao oure

  • @johndeer1050
    @johndeer1050 Місяць тому

    Get trump on please

  • @arrunpalacio5002
    @arrunpalacio5002 Місяць тому

    is there any other possible answer

  • @ianubhavtomar
    @ianubhavtomar Місяць тому

    9:00 For Example - Bangladesh

  • @cadupolito1626
    @cadupolito1626 Місяць тому +14

    If you think anything "changed" it's because you don't know shit about Brazil. With all due respect, some people from America like to think they have all figured out when it comes to international politics, and I mean...I've seen some awarded journalists like Glenn Grenwald which was maried to an acctual congress man here in Brazil talking some craaaaazy horse shit about Brazilian politics. i know everyone has some bias, it's rare to see someone who did not take a side, but politics here in Brazil go waaaaay beyond what you guys can possibly understand, and Lula is not who you guys think he is, someday everyone will know, but by then we'll all be fucked here in BR.

    • @Erivanci
      @Erivanci Місяць тому

      You mean Lula is worse than people think in America? Well the guy went to jail for corruption, was let go without the allegations disproved, and was still elected ad a president. I'd say Brasil is already fked.

    • @MeanStreamFraudCast
      @MeanStreamFraudCast Місяць тому

      Greenwald is a hack fraud

    • @mb-kh2nb
      @mb-kh2nb Місяць тому +6

      You said a lot without saying ANYTHING

    • @cadupolito1626
      @cadupolito1626 Місяць тому +5

      @@mb-kh2nb
      It just pisses me off when I see outsiders talking about politics from a country they don't know nothing about, that's all. Don't mind my comment, go on with your day...haha

    • @mikeottersole
      @mikeottersole Місяць тому +3

      ​@@cadupolito1626 Your rant, however justified, would be better served with some details. People in the US have very little knowledge of Brazil outside of Rio de Janeiro and Copacobana Beach. And a huge rainforest and river. The corruption is overwhelming, or am I wrong. I know it is in all of Latin America, to different degrees.