CT's application of vultology makes too many assumptions to ever be considered objective in any sense. If he were to follow up with each case, he would begin to see the holes in his methodology are glaring, and his application and strategy are flawed, but currently he is surrounded by Gamma's who would like to cash him out. Auburn, people do not want an objective typology. If you look inside all other successful communities, the talk isn't about the theory so much as it is about self improvement and the struggle of the individual. Every one of these communities aims to apply a very specific formula to a specific life problem clustered around a "type". Vultology doesn't offer this. It offers quite the opposite in fact. It tells an individual who they are, who they look like, and that a profile will be written at some point. This strategy misses because the people who come into this community generally do not fit in anywhere else, their life already feels absolute, and they push back on this by digging in to maintain an abstract sense of self. Embedded within an abstract sense of self is a feeling of *hope*. They want to reduce their suffering and their confusion, because they are in pain. You need more humanity and less robotics or you will fail.
I understand what you mean but if we consider CT as research project (which it claimed to be) then I think this system isn't "robotic" enough. As you wrote there is too many holes and Auburn should be focused of checking his system's assumptions and little by little improve upon them to make it be considered as "objective enough". But instead he tried to play on two fronts and failing on both.
Good points. You summarised my reasons for my lose of interest in ct and make some of them explicit. Thank you.
Update us soon please
CT's application of vultology makes too many assumptions to ever be considered objective in any sense. If he were to follow up with each case, he would begin to see the holes in his methodology are glaring, and his application and strategy are flawed, but currently he is surrounded by Gamma's who would like to cash him out.
Auburn, people do not want an objective typology. If you look inside all other successful communities, the talk isn't about the theory so much as it is about self improvement and the struggle of the individual. Every one of these communities aims to apply a very specific formula to a specific life problem clustered around a "type". Vultology doesn't offer this. It offers quite the opposite in fact. It tells an individual who they are, who they look like, and that a profile will be written at some point. This strategy misses because the people who come into this community generally do not fit in anywhere else, their life already feels absolute, and they push back on this by digging in to maintain an abstract sense of self. Embedded within an abstract sense of self is a feeling of *hope*. They want to reduce their suffering and their confusion, because they are in pain. You need more humanity and less robotics or you will fail.
I understand what you mean but if we consider CT as research project (which it claimed to be) then I think this system isn't "robotic" enough. As you wrote there is too many holes and Auburn should be focused of checking his system's assumptions and little by little improve upon them to make it be considered as "objective enough". But instead he tried to play on two fronts and failing on both.
@@PeterIntrovert and...never a response from Auburn, which I think is a response in of itself.
Check discord.