Is This the Real 'F-52' Fighter jet?

Поділитися
Вставка
  • Опубліковано 21 вер 2024
  • President Donald Trump recently told reporters that the United States had delivered the F-52 to Norway. The statement was obviously a mistake; there is no such thing as an F-52 yet. The aircraft only exists in the context of a video game called “Call of Duty: Advanced Warfare”-however, there was once a real world concept that looks similar to the fiction jet.
    “In November we started delivering the first F-52s and F-35 fighter jets,” Trump said. “We have a total of 52 and they’ve delivered a number of them already a little ahead of schedule.”
    The aircraft that appears in Call of Duty: Advanced Warfare is clearly based on early 1990s-era Lockheed Martin concepts for the Naval Advanced Tactical Fighter and the later A/F-X-both of which were based on the YF-22 demonstrator aircraft that eventually became the F-22 Raptor.
    Read more: goo.gl/n6hEhW

КОМЕНТАРІ • 617

  • @willisix2554
    @willisix2554 4 роки тому +3

    As an Air Force veteran, I've seen hundreds of airplanes take off and land fly by all of that, but I've never seen anything fly so smooth as this aircraft not even my beloved F-15

  • @pcz5233
    @pcz5233 6 років тому +63

    The Black Widow F23 was a badass jet...should've been built..

    • @alanwhiteside410
      @alanwhiteside410 6 років тому +1

      Paul Trekker62
      You are absolutely right!
      I was at Edwards AFB after the testing of the two planes was done and I heard even the test pilots that were testing the two planes
      (F-23 & F22) liked the F-23 the best.

    • @MiguelRodriguez-zd6tq
      @MiguelRodriguez-zd6tq 5 років тому +2

      Paul Trekker62 That plane was too good to just be scrapped. I bet the f23 went on for further development, maybe for a 6th gen concept. They'll remove the seats, as the next generation of fighters will be unmanned, and it will be fitted with lasers. Maybe they'll also replace the engines with a dual-mode scramjet, which means they'll be able to takeoff from a conventional runway. In any event the Black widow could not have been trashed; it was just too good. Or maybe it's just my fantasy that's keeping it alive.

    • @randygillespie8038
      @randygillespie8038 5 років тому +2

      Sir, What makes you sure we don't have them.I loaded from green ramp. At unspecified Air
      Base while jumping, That plane is Real.Its 1 badass. Can't touch that.

    • @dominicviner6619
      @dominicviner6619 5 років тому

      I love the plane too...but who knows how effective the Dimond wing design is. It's bigger. And probably more expensive.
      They could bring it back because of the budgets. And use the same design but upgrade it but who knows.
      We don't really knew who week its actual flight was. Or its computer systems. Or cost

    • @robertabell9182
      @robertabell9182 5 років тому

      Paul Trekker62 true that all day long

  • @Titan_Abhay_007
    @Titan_Abhay_007 3 роки тому +1

    Donald Trump is living in the virtual world of 'Call of Duty'....

  • @benthekeeshond545
    @benthekeeshond545 6 років тому +14

    This is one beautiful bird. The inside is just as impressive. Unquestionable #1 in the world.

  • @OCRay1
    @OCRay1 5 років тому +1

    True. We are actually currently developing a program to add the strengths of the f35 into the f22 platform to create a plane that is better then either of the originals rather than wait much longer for a gen 6 plane. Not that we won’t be working on that sixth gen jet, but this will help us in the more immediate future and makes sense. Kind of a wonder why it wasn’t done sooner.

    • @loganhoehne2225
      @loganhoehne2225 Рік тому

      A year or two ago they signed a huge defense budget, and in that budget was upgrades for the new and improved F-22 “Super raptor”.. their taking all our current inventory and doing massive technology and stealth upgrades. Allegedly only half of the raptors inventory is “battle ready” so I’m sure they will be making sure all of them are good to go. So if you think it’s cool now, wait till you see them in 2024

  • @chiefseadawg5164
    @chiefseadawg5164 6 років тому +10

    Since the retirement of the F-14 Tomcat, the U.S. Navy has certainly made it be known that it very much misses not having an air-dominance fighter. The FA-18 Super Hornet and the F-35C Lightning II (for which the Navy hasn't even yet declared Initial Operational Capability (IOC)), are multi-role fighters, not air-dominance fighters. Unlike the Air Force, the Navy could not realistically possess an undisclosed already built secret fighter aircraft in great numbers, as all Navy fighters necessarily operate on highly visible aircraft carriers, where they must undergo carrier qualifications. And the aircraft carriers themselves must also be certified to operate each type of aircraft deployed onboard them.

    • @herbertwilson2223
      @herbertwilson2223 6 років тому

      John Nemitz it o

    • @timallen609
      @timallen609 6 років тому +1

      Well actually you are thinking of the F 18 Hornet , The Super Hornet is the air superiority Fighter for the US Navy . The US turned down the Naval version of the F 22. They went with the Super Hornet instead to focus on their own development of a 6th gen fighter the FA XX . When the F 14 was retired it left a big hole . The Naval Brass didn't want the Air Force to install their choice with the F 22. Of the 1100 F 18's we have only 400 or so are Super Hornets . By 2025 is what was said for The FA XX so I a m guessing by 2035 lol . But that is the plan anyway

    • @timallen609
      @timallen609 6 років тому +1

      @@Yahweh312 what? Lol you got any kind of evidence ? Because if you are informed by the insiders just know " loose lips sinks ships " watch your back out there it is a jungle out there.

    • @timallen609
      @timallen609 6 років тому +1

      @@Yahweh312 well more bad news the F 14 is still in service just sayin.......Iran still has a handful of the 74 that Nixon sold them

    • @TheRusty58
      @TheRusty58 5 років тому

      ​@@Yahweh312
      Oh man, your comment is so confused, both in relation to the mentioned types of aircraft and also to your conspiracy theory....
      I will not go into your trash regarding to your conspiracy theory.
      But, do you really think that the F-15E Strike Eagle is not a worthy successor to the F-111 Aardwark ?? Really?
      Um, the pilots from the USAF, who have switched from the F-111 Aardwark to the F-15E Strike Eagle, have told a different story!
      Saying after switching to the new aircraft type, "I almost can not believe that I'm allowed to fly this plane! HOTAS capability, HUD, CFTs and FLIR, full air combat skills! While flying the Aardwark, all this was at this time no topic yet. "

  • @javadxxxx4626
    @javadxxxx4626 5 років тому +12

    This is F-22 raptor.
    not is the new air croft!!

  • @psyrobs6433
    @psyrobs6433 4 роки тому +3

    Meanwhile in China:
    - turn on your PC we have job to do!!

  • @YuriSurfsYT
    @YuriSurfsYT 5 років тому +6

    Russian: 💰💰=1 MiG 29. Hm... power can compare with F-16.
    US: 💰💰💰💰💰= 1 F-16.
    no need to talk.
    Btw, as a Russian, American weapons are more advanced than ours.

    • @TheRusty58
      @TheRusty58 5 років тому

      Yuri Karasov
      Hi Yuri, You wrote MiG 29.... power can compare with F-16.
      In this comparison, you probably only compared the thrust-to-weight ratio.
      And perhaps the possible carried missiles.
      But Yuri, that's not all!
      In 1988, after the great display of the MiG 29 from Farnborough in England, flown by pilot Anatolj Kwotshur (great man!!) in the cockpit, all experts in the West agreed: The MiG 29 is superior in aerial combat against all western types of aircraft!
      After the fall of the Warsaw Pact and the GDR, the 24 MiG 29 of the NVA fell to the German Air Force.
      Question: Why was this superior aircraft so few years in service with the German Air Force?
      Answer, because the avionics and the radar of the MiG 29 was years back compared to the contemporary ones. Even the old F-4 Phantom II from the 1970s was used in Germany for 10 years longer than the MiG 29.
      Today, here in the West the experts cheer, Sukhoj has developed the stealth fighter Su 57! This aircraft will be able to win an aerial dogfight against any Western fighter aircraft ...
      Um, 15 years ago, the Americans have put into service the F-22 Raptor, a stealth fighter equipped with AESA radar technology.
      And even today Russian technicians have not been able to produce an AESA radar ready for production.
      Not even for the Su 57.
      It always says, "we're working on it!"
      And in the west, the French Dassault Rafale has been flying with AESA Radar for eight years in the fighter squadrons, the F-18E Super Hornet for fourteen years ....
      BTW, Russia wants to produce this year 12 Su 57 for a fighter squadron.... the further production is not guaranteed yet.
      Peace, greetings to Russia!

    • @dustrussell5783
      @dustrussell5783 5 років тому +1

      Lol about cost... I'm American I know our two countrys have little tension between our governments but I have no problem with the Russian people. We might have more advanced weapons but costs ridiculous amounts of money.

    • @nicshepherd7726
      @nicshepherd7726 5 років тому

      We know bud 😂

    • @fadzilicious4411
      @fadzilicious4411 5 років тому

      Well 700 billion to 60 billion military budget. Obviously that will happen. But at the end of the day 60 billion dollars out towards trying to kill someone is also a fuck ton of money.

  • @kennethdefreitas6845
    @kennethdefreitas6845 6 років тому +1

    Man these jets have more maneuverability than a helicopter

  • @LordMephistoteles
    @LordMephistoteles 6 років тому +1

    i still dream of the YF 23, man, the world of flying would be very different

  • @ibizenco
    @ibizenco 6 років тому +2

    I have an F-53 right here next to me, and it's saying "Hi all" to everyone.

  • @mrandrossguy9871
    @mrandrossguy9871 5 років тому

    Robot Voice + Trump =
    Seriously though , kinda clever ?

  • @johnscallan5648
    @johnscallan5648 6 років тому

    The RS-71 was changes to SR-71 after President Johnson called it SR-71 by mistake in a press conference in 1964. People make mistakes, get over it.

  •  5 років тому

    I'm a little shocked at all the support from different countries in the comments, thanks guys xD

  • @seannootherway
    @seannootherway 5 років тому +5

    It looks..... it looks so beautiful!

  • @BillSmith-ut5li
    @BillSmith-ut5li 4 роки тому

    That is the Y f 23 built by Northrop and it was indirect competition with the y f 22 which is now now the F-22.

  • @expatriad7885
    @expatriad7885 4 роки тому +1

    This is from ace combat concept... Every old gamer knew it.

  • @docwill184
    @docwill184 3 роки тому

    Many still think the YF-23 shoulda been chosen. It's much more sleek than YF-22.

  • @andypaul1752
    @andypaul1752 4 роки тому

    The f 52 is so stealth... it’s invisible...

  • @thudthud5423
    @thudthud5423 6 років тому

    The "F-52" mistake could be from blending "F-22" with "B-52".

  • @wilmerjosevelasquez.martin2297
    @wilmerjosevelasquez.martin2297 4 роки тому

    This plane is a crude copy of the f22 and f35 - nothing to do with the Russian su57 - that itself is a masterpiece of aviation

  • @davidsherman3643
    @davidsherman3643 6 років тому

    Get some knowledge on these aircraft! Lockheed-Martin developed the YF-22 into the F/A-22 RAPTOR. The Joint Strike Fighter, also known as the F-35 Lighning II, is a stealth aircraft with three variants of the same airframe. One version is for the Air Force, one for the Navy, and one for the Marines. The YF-23 was never developed into a production aircraft, and wilk probably never see duty.

  • @BROTHERSKEEPER777
    @BROTHERSKEEPER777 4 роки тому

    if i was pres.trump id say break out an sr71 and take me for a ride!

  • @tessemi
    @tessemi 6 років тому +1

    Trump probably meant to say 52 f22s.

  • @kiketve2
    @kiketve2 5 років тому

    At minute 7:51 the sound of the turbines is so weird, I've never heard that in a jet.

  • @bastiancooper-queen1849
    @bastiancooper-queen1849 2 роки тому

    Donnie was missing simply with F22....even its not for sale to foreign countries....!?

  • @wigmoreyu7240
    @wigmoreyu7240 6 років тому

    THE WORLD OF BIG BOYS TOYS: U.S-i have F-35 and F-22, RUSSIA-i have SU-27, CHINA- i have J-31, OKAY! let us play.

  • @philipmanlapaz4438
    @philipmanlapaz4438 4 роки тому

    You fool us . This is F22 and not F52

  • @noriccrome6251
    @noriccrome6251 4 роки тому

    And again everyone forgets this fact. The F 117 stealth flew for 8 years before anyone knew they existed. Those jets parked in the open with Russian satellites looking down is the best way of hiding top secret jets. It called the look here and not there scam. WW2 secret mission is now a movie. B25 bombers loaded on an aircraft carrier. Did anyone notice the fog? The time to launch the mission was on a foggy day.

  • @williambirdwell8792
    @williambirdwell8792 5 років тому +4

    F22 demo is unreal 🇺🇸

  • @sactyb
    @sactyb 4 роки тому +1

    Funny how we cant take any photos with this aircraft for memories while we serve and do all the grunt work for this aircraft...but yet the military allow this video to float around the internet..smfh!

  • @hashemabasi4584
    @hashemabasi4584 5 років тому +1

    How bad is the voicemail

  • @alamudesky1959
    @alamudesky1959 6 років тому

    My mistake XF 85 B version

  • @jamesfritz5375
    @jamesfritz5375 4 роки тому

    Why dont they put that technology into a f15 or just bring back the f14

  • @chrisrossi5176
    @chrisrossi5176 6 років тому +11

    Is the F-52 the version that doesn't send all flight and operations information back to Lockheed? lol

  • @danlewellyn6734
    @danlewellyn6734 6 років тому +2

    When ever I hear a computer voice I change videos

    • @dougc.1773
      @dougc.1773 4 роки тому +1

      Good idea since most of the content thereafter is total bullshite

    • @jaykay8295
      @jaykay8295 4 роки тому

      But stay long enough to comment

    • @danlewellyn6734
      @danlewellyn6734 4 роки тому

      @@jaykay8295 obviously

  • @davidsalcido383
    @davidsalcido383 5 років тому

    “Nope, its an USAF Monarch butterfly!!!” 😇😇😇😇😇😇

  • @SuperBoris1976
    @SuperBoris1976 6 років тому +9

    Maybe he knows something none of you do

  • @zyclodiath
    @zyclodiath 6 років тому

    okay we already send F 52 to mars actually

  • @olasiaaisalo264
    @olasiaaisalo264 4 роки тому +2

    Is This the Real 'F-52' Fighter jet.

  • @jmcfintona999
    @jmcfintona999 4 роки тому

    Is this entire channel inaccurate click bait? What's next a video featuring the p51 asking is it the new f45

  • @im__sam
    @im__sam 6 років тому +9

    Give the guy a break he got mixed up because if was 52 planes and he said they were delivering 52 f52's he obviously meant 52 f35's but got mixed up

  • @ЗаСвет-щ8э
    @ЗаСвет-щ8э 5 років тому +4

    Великолепный самолет.....

    • @НиколайТищенко-г5р
      @НиколайТищенко-г5р 4 роки тому +1

      Да, гроб летающий, нормальный.

    • @ЗаСвет-щ8э
      @ЗаСвет-щ8э 4 роки тому

      Коль Американцы тоже достойные самолеты строят.им еще чем повезло .деньги позволяют эксперементировать и неплохие партии выпускать.при этом отрабатывать технологии итп...а там если че взамен на ресурсы и влияние подарят более слабой стране

  • @jamesbrandt6154
    @jamesbrandt6154 4 роки тому

    If I understand matters, the F-52 is under development and is the compliment of the SR-72, only it's not a strategic bomber like the SR-72. It's taken the forefront for both the Navy and AirForce, and promises to be around for a very long time of service to our efforts in surgical warfare. The next step in it's development is the definition of it's armaments, lasers, and surgical warfare nuclear bombs.
    Also it must be capable of flight at nearly any altitude, where other aircraft simply can't fly. It's fast too, with velocities near gravitational escape velocity of 1750MPH. Let me say one more thing. If all nations on earth were equally empowered militarily, wars would be as common place as people willing to fight and die in them. And there are plenty of people like that, born every day. Like it or not, the USA must play the role of world police, "government of the people" for the people and by the people and now in world matters. I would like to voice my appreciation of the USAF for accepting my help in this matter, just to let you know.

  • @trentonr7072
    @trentonr7072 6 років тому +169

    This is the F-22. You should delete your video

    • @zaldyfernandez2792
      @zaldyfernandez2792 6 років тому +3

      Trenton R no its the RAPTOR 😂

    • @keithhylton4631
      @keithhylton4631 6 років тому +12

      Zaldy Fernandez the F-22 is the raptor

    • @tomboyle7901
      @tomboyle7901 6 років тому +2

      Russians are to stupid to speak English.

    • @meehzinhoo276
      @meehzinhoo276 6 років тому +2

      You should delete your comment look at discription

    • @thhdhn2
      @thhdhn2 5 років тому +4

      you must be trump supporter.

  • @jimwest1967
    @jimwest1967 5 років тому +1

    you spelled 22 wrong

  • @willywayne5299
    @willywayne5299 5 років тому

    We have just enough of these Raptors to make difference,and compliment the F-15,f-18 and the new bad boy f-35 ,go Air Force and Navy!!!

  • @udontknowme7798
    @udontknowme7798 6 років тому

    Yea, sell the YF 23 to Norway and call it F-52

  • @debajitmandal482
    @debajitmandal482 4 роки тому

    O no it's martin lockheed f 22 raptor

  • @JimmyMitchell-Lucky
    @JimmyMitchell-Lucky 4 роки тому

    Trust me if that were an F-52 I would be the very first one to know!!!

  • @crazyt1ger08
    @crazyt1ger08 4 роки тому

    So he meant F 35.....so what?

  • @gabrielescal4506
    @gabrielescal4506 4 роки тому

    Yf 23 they have.. But not massed produced.

  • @mikeumpire698
    @mikeumpire698 4 роки тому

    I want to see the TR3B, already patent.. why can't we see it?

  • @blackking7759
    @blackking7759 4 роки тому

    Why they stop the Y-f23 program that was the best 👌 design on a airplane fighter i ever seen. Why why

  • @davidhughes4728
    @davidhughes4728 4 роки тому +3

    That is the most incredible J I ever seen that is awesome man I cannot believe it that's badass they need to keep up the good work

  • @jean-loupdesbordes4833
    @jean-loupdesbordes4833 4 роки тому

    I am not sure about the plane but I am sure about the president and I finally am sure that United States should have get rid of one of both ... the one that would have never been a project for the nation.

  • @БекБериков-е8н
    @БекБериков-е8н 5 років тому +3

    Super f 22 raptor👍👍👍

  • @user-bn5bv7kl7e
    @user-bn5bv7kl7e 4 роки тому

    Did you see the Russian «МИГ» ??????
    This is the real fly jet .

  • @user-zp2tm8xl7x
    @user-zp2tm8xl7x 5 років тому

    가격이 너무 비싸서 .. 몇대 없다는 그거죠.. 유지 비용 엄청나게 비싸다고 하죠..

  • @danielcamorra8677
    @danielcamorra8677 4 роки тому

    is a modernized f 22 from analog to digital F- 57SU JJAJAJAJ

  • @muneebghaffar9984
    @muneebghaffar9984 6 років тому +14

    This is F-22 not F-52

    • @SpellOfSin
      @SpellOfSin 5 років тому

      Shut the fuck up and get the joke

  • @davidbrillian8591
    @davidbrillian8591 6 років тому +16

    life democrasy✌✌✌

  • @adrianburgariu8896
    @adrianburgariu8896 6 років тому

    One land snow and water anytime no changes.

  • @dainisstranga4440
    @dainisstranga4440 4 роки тому +1

    Good Bless America ❤️❤️❤️

  • @meeddi42
    @meeddi42 4 роки тому

    I like the F22 a lot.

  • @fido0825
    @fido0825 6 років тому +11

    I refuse to listen to these annoying "digitized voice" videos...I skip them immediately.

    • @mofleh177
      @mofleh177 5 років тому

      The ground crew movement looks somehow digitized like if they were robots

    • @duncs001
      @duncs001 5 років тому

      @@mofleh177 i agree with you, it's just another way for youtubers to make money. Just copy the script on the wikipedia page, and then get an electronic reader to read it. Show lots of related, and often unrelated video, and presto! Really annoying.

  • @richardstout6364
    @richardstout6364 5 років тому

    Thumbnail picture Looks like the YF22 mock up from the late 80’s early 90’s to me..... rest of video just shows f22’s

  • @juanalvarez7081
    @juanalvarez7081 4 роки тому +1

    Formidable este pájaro de acero.

  • @ogplboogiemangonzo7129
    @ogplboogiemangonzo7129 5 років тому +7

    Such a beautiful plane 😍.It's been around from the 80 's Just imagine In 10 more years what kind of planes The USA will produce.🤔🎂

    • @Durgeshkumar360
      @Durgeshkumar360 4 роки тому

      It's only coz Russian don't have enough fund's to fund their projects otherwise USA will be no where.

  • @jacchhpa
    @jacchhpa 5 років тому +7

    Amerika yes from kristen indonesia.
    God bless us

  • @vinaykumarsingh9636
    @vinaykumarsingh9636 6 років тому

    new strealth fighter jet is disapper in every radar

  • @julesverne2509
    @julesverne2509 6 років тому

    I dont think that thing will stall.

  • @luccianodeive6605
    @luccianodeive6605 6 років тому

    INCREÍBLE LA CAPACIDAD DE MANIOBRA QUE PUEDE EJECUTAR ESTE FIGHTER JET.

  • @adipakiamerican4628
    @adipakiamerican4628 5 років тому

    Wow this is a bad ass jet. U can’t mess with this one.

  • @apolinariomabuni3599
    @apolinariomabuni3599 5 років тому

    if yf23 was mass produced, then f22 was the badass hahaha.

  • @YouTubeQuora
    @YouTubeQuora 5 років тому

    It's raptor they changed its firing ass..

  • @marshthefox6668
    @marshthefox6668 6 років тому

    Keep the F-22, Shoulda Scraped the F-35 When We Had The Chance.

  • @chrisihg2123
    @chrisihg2123 6 років тому +3

    that is F-22 Raptor!!!

  • @murphdog6968
    @murphdog6968 5 років тому

    Kidding me? You literally made an entire video about a grammar mistake?

  • @DrilIaszn
    @DrilIaszn 6 років тому +1

    to save you guys from the 10mins he says theys no f52 with in the first 00:20 of the vid

  • @kerentolbert5448
    @kerentolbert5448 4 роки тому

    Can a fighter jet fly with out a tail like the B-2?

  • @nishantshrestha569
    @nishantshrestha569 6 років тому

    sir please tell me us upcoming fighter aircraft is a 6th generation jet

  • @dainisstranga4440
    @dainisstranga4440 4 роки тому +1

    I recommend: COMPLETE BOYCOTT for Chinese and Russian goods, products - the answer to the aggressor

  • @ehsaanmomin5098
    @ehsaanmomin5098 4 роки тому

    this is YF23

  • @janicesmith4383
    @janicesmith4383 6 років тому

    He was talking about the F35

  • @bocat1964
    @bocat1964 6 років тому +1

    Of course there is an F-52 you just don't have the clearance or the need to know.

  • @เงียบเหงาอยู่ตลอด

    Love yf23

  • @eddiedickens3184
    @eddiedickens3184 6 років тому

    No, but it is indeed the real f 22.

  • @seriouslybruh602
    @seriouslybruh602 6 років тому +1

    f-22 raptor mate...

  • @AL-zz4mz
    @AL-zz4mz 5 років тому

    No its not! It is UFO 😂

  • @joelvergarajk5274
    @joelvergarajk5274 4 роки тому

    That's is f22 raptor... Not f52..

  • @georgekolotouros230
    @georgekolotouros230 6 років тому

    Damnit, hoping it was a new plane.

  • @thomaslavin3640
    @thomaslavin3640 4 роки тому

    They should have bought a alot more of them in the first place. The USAF ... knows this now..

  • @rosebeaufort6238
    @rosebeaufort6238 4 роки тому

    Hope it's V/STOL

  • @richard_gallardoakasoultrk3903

    Very good work I am impressed w our technology congratsulationso. Ur success I feel secure now since in our times thanku

  • @philipbrailey
    @philipbrailey 5 років тому

    I have a C152.

  • @nadderwilliam5446
    @nadderwilliam5446 5 років тому +1

    I like F-22.........Piece of Art

    • @tragkfshnt
      @tragkfshnt 5 років тому

      Nadder William
      You mean piece of shit, the SU-47 Flanker is a kick ass plane, and I know planes ever since I was 10.

  • @arnelechon1983
    @arnelechon1983 5 років тому

    It's not F52.. It's F22..