Johnny Harris: A Story of YouTube Propaganda
Вставка
- Опубліковано 7 чер 2024
- Go to Surfshark.deals/tomnicholas and use code TOMNICHOLAS to get 83% off a 2-year plan and 3 extra months for free. Protect yourself online today!
Watch this video ad-free on Nebula: nebula.tv/videos/tom-nicholas...
A story about Johnny Harris, propaganda and misinformation on UA-cam.
Chapters
0:00 Introduction
0:40 1. A Journalist Who Hates the News
03:48 2. "How China Became So Powerful"
08:31 3. The World Economic Forum, the Davos Summit and the "Great Reset"
15:40 Surfshark VPN Spot
17:19 4. Brand Deals, Sponsorships and Misinformation
22:44 5. From Journalism to Propaganda
29:13 6. The Golden Age of Misinformation
Some Copy about the Video for the UA-cam Algorithm
In this month's video, we're looking at a couple of videos by journalist Johnny Harris (Vox Borders), particularly a recent video by Harris called "How China Became So Powerful", which was produced in partnership with the World Economic Forum (WEF). I use the story of Johnny Harris' partnership with the WEF as a jumping-off point for discussing the growing tide of propaganda and misinformation on social media sites such as UA-cam.
In particular, I'm interested in using the example of Harris as a means of discussing the various dangers of independent journalism coming into contact with the so-called "influencer economy" and how this might leave such journalism open to distortion by bad actors.
Along the way, we also touch upon what the shady activities of the World Economic Forum (organisers of the annual Davos Summit in which Heads of State meet with representatives from some of the richest corporations in the world) and their current initiative the "Great Reset", which has been jumped upon by conspiracy theorists but is actually a vague attempt to rebrand capitalism as being able to solve inequality and the climate emergency (rather than being their cause).
We also very briefly touch upon the notions of "shareholder capitalism" and "stakeholder capitalism" which Harris discusses in his "How China Became So Powerful" before considering what Harris' partnership with the World Economic Forum might have in common with attempts by the Chinese Government to spread its own propaganda on this platform.
Support the channel on Patreon at / tomnicholas
If you've enjoyed this video and would like to see more including my What The Theory? series in which I provide some snappy introductions to key theories in the humanities as well as video essays and more then do consider subscribing.
Thanks for watching!
Twitter: / tom_nicholas
Instagram: / tomnicholaswtf
Patreon: / tomnicholas
Website: www.tomnicholas.com/
#johnnyharris #propaganda #tomnicholas
![ПОЛНАЯ ИСТОРИЯ ЭКЗОРЦИЗМА [Топ Сикрет]](http://i.ytimg.com/vi/qBySr6Bt0B8/mqdefault.jpg)
Hey there so I finally watched your video. You raise some strong points (I had only seen the thumbnail when someone sent it to me and figured it was a conspiracy theory about me.) I’m deleting my original comment cuz it’s snarky and undermining. Not warranted for what seems like a well constructed set of arguments against my WEF video.
You raise useful points about ethics and journalism in a UA-cam context.
The short answer to your concerns is that 1. I may not agree with you on where the ethical line is in journalism and working with think tanks to tell stories I feel are compelling.
And 2. The video I made with the WEF was the product of me having read a pre order copy of the book (cuz I like books like this) and pitching the WEF on sponsoring a video on the topic of the duck graph. They agreed. I made the video. They didn’t write the script. They didn’t see the script. They didn’t have any creative or editorial influence in the work. They did really solid research and analysis for their book and I wanted to make a video that unpacked it. I think it’s reasonable if you disagree with my decision. But I feel comfortable having done this work.
Overall, I’m impressed with your writing and presentation skills in this vid. Well researched and connecting useful dots to make your point. You have a new sub!
Edit:
So, I think I jumped into nice mode the other day (as is my tendency) but, while I’d still like to keep things civil, I can’t help but feel there remain a lot of questions raised by this statement as well as some very convenient timing being involved which I think it would be worth clarifying.
Again, I don’t wanna drag out the “drama” because that’s not what I’m about, but I do think it’s vital to ask questions about what I think most reasonable people would see as deeply unethical practices.
So, if you’ve got a moment, would you mind clarifying:
- How did you come into possession of an advance copy of Stakeholder Capitalism? Knowing how behind the times academic presses (such as Wiley & Sons) can be, it seems unlikely they’re sending out advance copies of books to UA-camrs (especially ones who don’t review books and tend not to talk directly about the topics at hand). Was this the result of a previous relationship with the WEF? And, if so, was the book sent to you with the intention of encouraging a partnership on a video?
- Why does an amended version of the script for the video appear on the WEF website as part of the Davos Agenda blogs? Yes, there are differences, but it’s essentially the same piece of writing beneath the surface. From the outside, this suggests a deeper relationship that them just agreeing to sponsor a video-those blog posts were an integral part of the public-facing wrap-around for the event.
- In addition to this, why does the blogpost version of the video feature both yourself and Peter Vanham as authors of the piece? Yes, you draw heavily on his book in the video but the book is also written by Klaus Schwab and his name doesn’t appear on the blogpost.
- Can you see how it might seem convenient that, as you describe it, you happened to approach the WEF out-of-the-blue asking if they wanted to sponsor a video at just the right time for it to launch alongside the Davos Agenda PR campaign, a campaign where they’ve specifically been looking to expand their reach on UA-cam in ways they haven’t before (ie. The Davos Daily with Lilly Singh).
If, as you’ve now confirmed above, the video was paid for by the WEF, why did it not (at least the many times I watched it whilst researching this video) use the “Contains Paid Promotion” banner required by UA-cam’s terms of service and many countries by law.
- Finally (and this one’s a bit of a broader question), do you regret being so outspoken about the state of contemporary journalism (going so far as to describe some outlets as so focussed on style over substance that they are “not journalism”)? I mostly agree with you there but I think, to most reasonable people, the idea of journalists being paid to promote a certain viewpoint uncritically is far more worrying than some outlets being a bit too entertaining?
Sorry for not putting these points to you sooner (I guess this is why we need real journalists doing proper journalism rather than me having to muddle along and fill in!).
Tagging you so you’ll hopefully see this: @Johnny Harris
Thanks. Have a great weekend. Tom.
Original Comment:
Thanks Johnny. Appreciate you taking the time out to respond. I obviously still disagree with you on where that ethical line sits; I think journalists exist to ask challenging questions of organisations such as the WEF, not to partner with them on content. What that means with regard to journos/educators on UA-cam is perhaps hazier given how new this space is and the lack of institutional norms/ethical codes but I think people should remain deeply sceptical of any such work. That aside (as big a point as it may be), I respect your craft and enjoy your stuff.
I’ll pin this as it only seems fair your response gets eyes on it. Hope you’re having a good week.
@@Tom_Nicholas my biggest critique of this whole discourse is that I haven’t heard someone engage with the actual content of my explanation. I spent loads of time sifting thru data and literature reviews of wonky journal papers to craft my understanding of income distribution over the past 35 years. I want a debate on THAT. The thrust of my argument. One that yes piggy backs off the work of a Swiss think tank but one that I nonetheless find compelling.
I commend your work on unpacking the morphing realities of journalism on UA-cam but I worry that writing something off as propaganda based on who paid for it can serve as a weak proxy for actually engaging with evidence and arguments. Just another point to add to the discussion I suppose.
I hate American breakfast
@@johnnyharris in all fairness to Tom here, these are UA-cam comments and social media is probably not a great place to debate substantial points. I think the best approach may be simply to acknowledge differences, appreciate each other’s craft, and when the time comes, find another forum to have the substantial discussion on another forum like a joint interview, or Oxford Union, or a neutral think tank event.
I think it's kinda funny how "propaganda" to Westerners often just means "a country's government (always another country though, never us!) serving a narrative to blissfully ignorant people" and never even consider uh, free market corporate propaganda. This is why I think this video is very important - with all the smugness I see with Americans laughing at the "propagandized", they often don't realize they're being sold something.
Yeah, I was thinking about this when I was beginning to write the stuff about the Chinese Government towards the end of this video; the manner in which we tend to resist conceiving of it as propaganda because it's "our lot" not the "mischievous foreigners".
LoL as a Chinese, these are taught on our middle school classes...
The background radiation of US propaganda that its citizens are bathed in easily matches or exceeds the impact of state propaganda from Russia and the PRC, who are much more honest about what they're doing.
Laundering the process through media corporations, PACs, think tanks, and other nonprofits was evil genius, since that extra step grants the US ruling class and their government the fig leaf of plausible deniability, using an absurd joint interpretation of the 1st and 14th amendments to frame this laundering as corporate "persons" using countless millions of USD to exercise their freedom of speech more effectively than any common individual possibly could. And many Americans are still dense enough to fall for the ruse when it's CNN or NPR doing it, despite easily recognizing that Al Jazeera is UAE propaganda, that RT is Russian propaganda, that China Daily is CPC propaganda, etc., etc.
What's _even more_ troubling is their failure to recognize BBC and ABC as mouthpieces of the UK and Australian governments respectively despite having an almost one-to-one parallel with RT, because the other Anglo state media biases match those of CNN and NPR.
And that concept of propaganda is in itself because we have been propagandized about what propoganda is - and this is the part where governments *do* come into it because this is in part taught in schools in a variety of ways.
@@aj7058 When it's _them_ , it's misinformation and propaganda, When it's _us_ , it's "public relations management" and "winning hearts and minds".
As a "traditional" journalist, I always laugh at all those videos and discussions about the downfall of mainstream media, when, in fact, "alternative" media, such as podcasts, youtube content creators, and digital news platforms are EXACTLY mimicking the modus operandi of MSM media, from the agenda-setting, to subtle political messaging, and income acquisition and sponsorship deals.
One final thing: I covered 2 Davos Summits, and I can tell you: it's a MASSIVE PR fest that every company worth its shares is keen on attending, and I've seen political/news content creators from all over the world rubbing shoulders with CEOs and politicians. No way in hell are you going to convince me that those impressionable teens/zoomers, who mostly sit at home and make videos, aren't going to be swayed and ideologically influenced by veteran capitalists and career politicians, whose entire careers are built on convincing millions of voters that their points of view are the correct ones.
I pay mind to the independent folk who get arrested for showing up to Davos
Jurnalistik on Harvest crime
They wrote wht u r very intellect Rite today is the one of your friends have fun 😁❤️
All news is bias. diff is w/content creators on YT & the like, they don’t claim to be Unbiased and objective like corporate/status quo media. 😑
Johnny is a traditional journalist branding himself as independent.
Vox was created and funded by a mainstream media person Ezra Klein, of the Washington Post, and investors from mainstream media. These UA-cam channels are not as independent as they pretend. There is also the UA-cam management system.
When Harris says in the pinned comment that the WEF didn't write nor edit the script for his video I think it would be useful to bring Chomsky's propaganda model, which points out that they wouldn't need to do it because they know that Harris's video will align with their interests. In other words, he probably believes their bs.
He believes what puts the food on the table. He was already "vetted" by Vox (a shameless outlet for propaganda) and was seen as safe.
World Economic Forum: “How do you do fellow proletariat?”
This comment is only for the fellow bourgeoisie
@@davidsypnicki8085 🤣😂🤣
how do you do, fellow proles?
"Boy, I'm sure tired after... cutting meat for... 5 hours a day?"
World Economic Forum = bad people
I came into this thinking: “Who’s that brat talking sh*t about one of my favourite creators?”
And I came out of it thinking: “Damn, this guy is smart and i should really level up my critical thinking when it comes to handsome hipsters who share my map fetish.”
Great Job, Tom!
Used to be a fan of Johnny too, started finding some things weird in his videos and the china one was the “breaking point”, it’s always good to question what you hear or read and think critically even about the things/people you like
He isnt handsome though
He is not handsome TO YOU...
This is so delightfully worded I legit chuckled.
We’ll always have Mark Cooper-Jones
I’ve always disliked Johnny Harris’s videos, not only because I’m a big history fan, because he sees these videos, comment on them saying he understands the points and apologizes, and promises to change, but the misinformation and propaganda CONTINUES, that’s what I hate about him.
That's the typical CIA operatives would say.
HIs "schtick" which is why the corpocrats love him, is that he can feign sincerity very well, and has the face for it.
Great that Johnny has learned his lesson and is now, in 2022 sticking to objective, ethically sound, well researched videos. OH WAIT, NAH, he’s learned absolutely nothing 😅
greatest comment
Just unsubscribe to that clown.
Fr lol, he's still putting out misinformation and blatant lies despite his promises to cite his sources
Can we expect more from a pseudo-intellectual leftist? Lying is all they do, it is as necessary for them as breathing.
You had me in the first half...
World Economic Forum = Do the bare minimum required to keep the people from revolting.
I mean, it's not even *do* the bare minimum, it's *say you're going to do* the bare minimum and then not actually do anything...
@@Tom_Nicholas It may be the case that the bare minimum truly is to simply provide lip service. A very convenient minimum when looking to safeguard profit, as it's quite cost effective.
@@Tom_Nicholas
_We're listening, and We Care._ 🤗😳👹
Ah yes, I'm sure the people are on the brink of revolting and overthrowing capitalism. It's not like Marxists have been saying the exact same thing for over 150 years with it being less and less true as time goes by.
@@scarybird977 I mean, we are facing the worst societal and political crises since the 80’s Cold War tensions, so whilst revolts aren’t likely to happen on their own yet, it’s never been a better time to accelerate it for the benefit of a complete changeover.
Nestle "stopping slavery would make chocolate more expensive" is pushing for an improved world? Have they considered shutting down?
Are they still doing that thing where they get impoverished babies reliant on their formula milk so that the parents have to buy it?
@@Tom_Nicholas well I think we are about due for a reboot on that. It will be like stranger things, only more existentially terrifying.
You should see what the Supreme Court has ruled for Nestle. They just ruled that people who claim to have been ENSLAVED by Nestle cannot sue them, and bring them to court. Nestle has always, and will continue to be the bad guy. They may not be getting babies addicted to their baby formula, but they‘ll probably never have to face the consequences of their immoral actions
@@Tom_Nicholas yes, they're still doing it in many countries, just not as directly as before. In 2018, the US government was pushing its weight to block a breastfeeding resolution, they continue to heavily push the idea that formula is equivalent in the Global South, and they are subsidized by WIC government funding in the US.
www.theatlantic.com/health/archive/2018/07/the-epic-battle-between-breast-milk-and-infant-formula-companies/564782/
Nestle - "water isn't a human right"
After the latest Johnny Harris video (the one explaining a recession) I find myself coming back to rewatch this. His video left a sour taste in my mouth as I felt it seemed to frame recessions as the fault of the people, downplayed the coming severity of the impending recession (even suggesting it may not come to pass at all) and just overall felt like it capitalist propaganda.
Of course Harris is parroting capitalist propaganda, that's why he gets far more visibility than anyone who can think critically.
So it's not that he's objective you don't like. It's that he's not a communist AKA he's not mad
@@suleydaman 3you've never read shit about communism.
@@suleydaman imagine thinking ducking off the world economic forum after someone explained how they blame people for recessions isn't mad.
@@suleydaman all of Johnny’s videos are corporation apologia that frames neoliberalism as the best thing to ever happen to humanity. It’s uncritical propaganda that serves no purpose except to attract more sponsors in the future. He can’t even pretend to be a real journalist at this point
I was particularly shocked by his portrayal of medieval Europe in one of his recent videos. It's not propaganda, but it's a rewrite of history that spreads misinformation, which according to him, is for "story-telling purposes"
How dare those Europeans be more advanced than other cultures it must be some sort of plot by them and never would’ve happened had this far away thing not happened (trust me bro)
@@SyntaxErr19287 Medieval Europeans were more advanced than other cultures? I think even they will disagree with you. The medieval period around the world was a time of progress and prosperity, but definitely not so much in western Europe. May be another time period.
@@SyntaxErr19287 triggered ❄️
@@SyntaxErr19287 anyone thinking Europe was some peaceful paradise in the medieval times is a brainwashed goon
@@nusaibahibraheem8183 That’s absolutely not true, it’s a common misconception from the vision of Europe you get from the mythos surrounding the “dark ages”. For all intents and purposes, Europe has dominated the planet since the fall of the Egyptian empire. Sorry that doesn’t sit well with you, but as a wise man who triggers you guys once said: Facts don’t care about your feelings.
I watched the “How China got so Powerful” video a few weeks ago as well, and found it to be sooooo strange. As soon as he started talking about “stakeholder capitalism” I was like, bro this is straight up corporate propaganda isn’t it? And the World Economic Forum sponsor confirmed it.
Thank you for making a video about this. Blatant propaganda like this needs to be challenged and debunked.
Yeah, just a really odd choice to do it.
@@Tom_Nicholas not really an odd choice, it was a choice in his own personal economic interest since he was paid to do it
Yeahhhh! I was a regular viewer up until then because that just seemed incredibly sketchy. Clearly that sponsorship either creates a conflict of interest or it means that he has a very specific pro-capitalistic goal that gave the WEF a reason to sponsor his propaganda.
Yeah I found that video so uninformative, it was literally just saying: capitalism good.
@@PeachesandCream225 Because genocidal regimes should be defended! Great sides we're picking here.
The moment I saw this vid pop up I was like: "He's going to talk about the China video, right"
It was like mental whiplash that video. Really unsubtle stuff.
(Edit: I should add that I do actually quite like Harris' videos. That was why I was watching the China video in the first place. The mental whiplash was mainly from the sheer surprise at how fast he veered off into this weird hippy capitalism shit!)
Yeah, the comments before it premiered were pretty evenly split between “I have no idea what this is gonna be about” and “I know exactly what this is gonna be about”.
It totally threw me for a loop because I was not expecting that kind of content from him! I skipped that video but have continued to be a mostly regular viewer since... I'm conflicted though.
I was thinking also about the Navalnyi where he almost wets his pants talking about Navalnyi 🤣 Some days later even amnesty international recognized his speech as HATEFUL 🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣
You joking? China got so powerful BECAUSE Deng's liberal reforms made it capitalist.
@@keylupveintisiete7552 why would anyone give a crap about what Amnesty International considers to be "hateful"?
The funniest part is the fact that "Stakeholder" is just another word for "Shareholder". The two have been used interchangeably for over 200 years, and suddenly in 2015-2019 there was a massive push (by think tanks like WEF) to pretend they aren't the same thing.
Not entirely the case. Think what they were getting at is a stakeholder is anyone affected by a company and it’s decisions (so employee, environment, consumers, shareholders etc) whereas shareholder only counts those who have actual shares in the company.
@@alphaglass6205 that is literally a definition that came into existence in the last 5 years, it was never defined in that manner at any other point in history. It is billionaires trying to rewrite the definition just so they can use it in a convoluted way.
@@ShionWinkler I mean, it's not exactly convoluted. People might talk about how they have a "stake" in something without it meaning they personally own stock in it. Plenty of writers use the expression "high stakes". I feel like saying the terms never been about people being affected is kinda overstating things.
@@ShionWinkler I was writing school reports about stakeholders a good 20 years ago. Just because you've only just heard of something doesn't make it new
@@ShionWinkler gonna have to disagree with you there. Maybe that's the case in your region of the world but when I was getting my diploma, we were taught there was a distinction between shareholders/ stakeholders.
Stakeholder - someone who has an explicit interest in the performance of a company but not necessarily a financial interest (think employees, business partners, local community)
Shareholder - someone who holds shares (investments) in the company.
I think the reason they have been used interchangeably is because Shareholders are Stakeholders in a business but the reverse isn't always true.
i was smelling propoganda from long while in his videos, high time someone acknowlegded it and validate it with so much information, you have gained a sub
Harris: Trust me because I say America's past wars were bad, but these next wars? They're great!!
The dude's defense of Navalny(who has compared muslims to cockroaches and cavities and said you should commit violence against them) instantly set off alarms in my head. Navalny has like 2% support in Russia and espouses such beliefs yet John follows the US' example and paints him as this righteous crusader for democracy
@@MB2.0 You should live in a Muslim Majority neighborhood in a developing country, and that will fix a lot of your issues.
@@MB2.0 lots of politicians have a dark background.
And he is the crusader for democracy. At least in Russia. This guy has exposed dozens of corruption schemes that the country is built on and went to jail just because of that. What's wrong with defending him?
@@axx8710 But few of them are literal n**zis. What's wrong with him is that he's a n**zi(this alone exposes that he's not interested in democracy) Western puppet with nearly non existent approval, trying to hand over Russian resources to people that have been trying to colonize it for centuries. But somehow according to Johnny Harris he's the guy that Russia so badly needs.
@@MB2.0 lmao it makes sense now. The problem with Navalny critics is they're dumb and are only capable of labeling him "nazi", "western puppet", "fifth colony" and etc. How is he a nazi?
All Navalny wanted is to end corruption in this government.
This is why I give more trust to UA-camrs with sponsors like Raid: Shadow Legends...
😂😂
Honestlyy💀
Nice little sell there
God I hate those ads so much just give me CCP propaganda lol
Come on...... Learn to recognise Big-Wizard and Chainmail Lobbiest propaganda when you see it.
I think this is a good reminder to be skeptical of most things, even if its coming from someone you think you generally agree with or like.
Agreed
Including on this video.
Agree. See Tom Nicholas and how he covers topics. Read: who he chooses (hits), cherry picked facts(narrative to drive), lack of perspective(there's more perspectives?) and bizarre conclusions (if you're a tune to his intentional whiffs on the first 3) he draws.
Read instead of getting information spoonfed. Also, do not trust a pretty face to tell you what to think. Yes, I think he is a handsome looking fella.
bottom line: analyze everything. form your own opinions.
My God I came back to this video after he put out a video on Joe Rogan. He is not even hiding the agenda anymore
I'm glad this video got made because otherwise I would have never connected the dots. I would have straight up thought I was watching a journalistic piece with no hidden motives. So thank you Tom Nicholas.
If they come out of nowhere and have millions of views, they are being casually pushed on you. I always knew there was something off about him for that reason.
Most independent social/political content is suppressed by the algorithm, unless it's the propaganda they want you to see.
@@Jay-gf8tm worst take ever.
@@yungaj6166 sure zoomer
@@yungaj6166 eh they're kinda right tbh. its not a guarantee, there are leftist youtubers that have a big audience but it is true as a tendency
Davos: where the world's richest go to pretend to have a conscience.
Great summary.
Bilderberg: ditto, but with no such pretence...
Forum of hypocrites.
Hypocrites or scam artists? I really hope nobody falls for their crap.
I'm a big fan of Johnny Harris's work, and this is the best call out I think I've ever seen. Civil, thoughtful, with very valid points and without any aggression. The bottom line is that it's incredibly important to be up-front about your relationship with funders, especially within journalism.
This is a strange comment. He is not just being sponsored by the World Economic Forum, he is parroting their propaganda as it if is his thoughts. Your comments only make sense if only are a fan of the WEF.
Yall go to china and see black people with chinese wifes and children eating outside of the restaurant while his wife and kid can eat inside, you better open your mouth about China when you know what the fuck is going on in that socialist shithole
@GN M Blaming is pointless, actions should be taken, but if theres someone to blame for chaos and massive support for softening the western society ( creating more and more mass confusion, clearly unnoticed yet ) that is China and all of its associates
@@hockeyisagame5044 Instead of revealing your racism, you should direct you big brain to learning that China is as capitalist as they come.
@@lindahlophe1572 I am by no means racist, go visit a less touristic area of China and convince yourself? How am I even racist by spitting facts? Huh
I've watched a few videos of yours over the last year (regrettably few, but I have a lot of creators to keep up with and not enough time!) so I just stumbled upon this one and the discussion with Harris in the comments and I gotta say, I couldn't be more impressed. Really a fantastic job, Tom. I'm adding you to my Patreon subs and I sincerely hope you continue this excellent work, it is sorely needed.
I have watched many Harris videos. He's likeable, intelligent, and diligent in his researching efforts. He seemed to combine personal charisma with a sensitivity and genuine concern for the human condition until now. I feel 'sucked in' by Harris, and this is reminder to think more critically and not allow ourselves to be charmed until we've asked deeper questions. Thank you for opening my eyes. Subscribed
Same on my end.
he definitely open my eyes to some of his questionable videos but harris videos be so interesting to watch just for the fukk of it
Dude, this Tom Nicholas guy is just playing the same game. He isn't saying anything profound, or even particularly groundbreaking, but he does use dramatic pauses, and pacing in his delivery, to make it sound like he is. The likes of Harris and Veritasium could be sincere in their enthusiasm for their chosen sponsors, but they're too big a trophy for this cat to pass up. Johnny got his Nord money, and Tom got his Surfshark money, but in the economy of clicks, you watched 'em both, and that's all that matters.
@@chuck1804 Dude, Did you even watch this video?? Not the same game at all. Nicholas advertised a service, in this case Surfshark, but he WROTE the entire content in the video. Harris DID NOT write his China video, Peter Van Ham did (WEF's public relations spokesperson). Harris' name appears in the credits subordinate to VanHam's and we only find that out if we go to the WEF website. Harris' HANDED OVER HIS CREATE CONTROL- that is not simple endorsement of a product.
WEF is not selling a product, it is selling propaganda and Harris let himself be used. Harris himself was very angry about this video because what Nicholas shows that his voice is for sale and that draws his journalistic integrity into question, regardless of whether he actually believes what the WEF is selling or not. Harris states he wrote the video so why did Van Ham get (WEF) top billing for the creation of the video?? Someone isn't telling the truth, and I don't think it's Nicholas.
He is diligent indeed - in acting as a cog in warmongering anti-China propaganda machine.
His videos about China are embarrassing...
I've been subscribed to Johnny for a while now, and I tend to really like what he has to say and the way he says it but yeah, that China Video was a biiiiiiiiiiiiiig yikes
Yeah, we're going to dig into that...
that video was the one where i was like.... who is this guy? what am i watching?
I had to unsubscribe after that.
The one against Russia had the same vibe but more discreet
@@SomeDudeQC I will unsub him now.
"The Great reset" it's like they were trying to spur on conspiracy theories
Yeah, I know, right? Although I'm sure they benefit in some ways from being able to tie anyone who criticises it in with the fringe conspiracy folk.
@@Tom_Nicholas So much this! it makes people turn off from genuine alerts which are not cheerful. If you felt like tackling the role of behavioural science or other techniques used on the populace it would be grand. Thank you for this vid it were ace.
@@Tom_Nicholas It sure works for Bill Gates.
@@camelopardalis84 I wish the parts of the Bill Gates conversation that are critical of the guy and his brand would focus more on the legitimate issues like being able to enforce an inexpert opinion on global health policy direction through the withholding of funds (such as advocating for eradication of one specific disease at the expense of doing public health work on a raft of more dangerous concerns), rather than vaguely gesturing towards tracking, privacy and the Jews
@@TAP7a I agree completely and am aware of the issue you raise. Didn't know about the "the Jews" part, though.
And I am completely serious when I say that Gates must be so glad that there are so many nonsense conspiracy theories he's at least an important part of. If I were kidnapping neighbourhood cats to keep them in the attic of my mansion, I sure would be pleased to have people who accuse me of being a literal witch due to me wearing a weird pointy hat, so I could point to people who rightfully accuse me of kidnapping cats and say "Look at these accusations again! These dumb-dumbs accuse me of being a witch who eats cats!"
Hey there Tom!
I've just come across your channel today and I'm enjoying your content.
I recall watching Johnny Harris' China video and feeling like something really strange was happening with the serious journalism he normally conveys.
I decided not to continue watching his content after that video.
Now, I see why watching it felt so off and odd. Thank you for the informative deep dive.
As a Chinese person, watching those videos often makes me question if I am living in a different universe called "China." It's both amusing and perplexing. 😂
作为一个中国人，看他的视频往往会怀疑自己是不是生活在另外一个宇宙的“中国”。
啼笑皆非。
So it seems that Johnny Harris- a brilliant storyteller, bends reality to align with the narrative he promotes, abandons the pursuit of truth in exchange for catchy videos and likes-collecting content, and works with those in power to spread propaganda and misleading information. In today's standards, what exactly isn't journalism here?
His video on Cuba is absurd. No mention at all of sanctions, for example. Just "oh gee whiz look how socialism doesn't work!"
Edit: If you're a journalist visiting a sanctioned country to show its difficulties, you shouldn't forget to mention sanctions. That goes for ANY country regardless of administration.
This is less about *what* was said (although I do spend a decent amount of time on that) than *why* it was said...
@@Tom_Nicholas Ah, okay, very interesting. I haven't watched the video yet. I'm looking forward to it.
@@Tom_Nicholas Having watched it now, and knowing that Johnny's video on Cuba was made for Vox, I now wonder how VOX is funded.
@@jonesmartins advertising, it's a pretty big media conglomerate.
@@AgusSimoncelli Every big media company is funded by advertising, right? I'm talking about specific think tanks, lobbying companies, etc.
You know what real 'stakeholder capitalism' looks like? democratically owned workplaces
You're not wrong.
Johnny video literally said oh corporations created the problems, its fine they'll take care of it, while being sponsored by the same
Damn right!✊
i call that socialism but you do you.
@@chagoriver7159 That is a better term for it yes
Johnny Harris is a very good storyteller and I've enjoyed some of his videos especially the one on nuclear submarines but I did notice a couple of problems in his "Why Russia invaded Ukraine" video that, to be fair, were mirrored by most media outlets at the time. Didn't watch his "Why China became powerful" video though so this is very interesting.
Well, "to be fair" the Oligarchy knows that not every body is enchanted with "most media outlets" and yet the Oligarchy wants to reach those people with its synchronized message. That's where Johnny Mouthpiece comes in to play.
I found Harris' mention of stakeholder capitalism laughable when that video first came out. Thank you for digging into the video and placing it in a larger context!
Yeah, I found the whole thing a bit odd on first watching it. The decision to make this video mostly came from a place of real disappointment; I've really enjoyed so much of Harris' work (and having an excuse to go and rewatch old episodes of Borders and his solo videos in order to write this was a real joy).
@@Tom_Nicholas Yeah I had the same thing - thought his videos were decent, and then thought that video took a really weird turn, glad you made a video on it so quickly
I don't care about the Davos crowd, their nefarious plans and propaganda. As a theoretical concept, stakeholder ownership, which associates with blockchain and proof-of-stake algorithms for block solving, is somewhat interesting. First, capitalism is perfectly well defined as ownership by shareholders under centralized bureaucracy and territorial monopoly of violence controlled by the centralized bureaucracy.
What might stakeholder ownership in post-capitalist system be like? For libertarian socialism, collective ownership whether formal (e.g. co-ops) or informal (commons) is by definition decentralized ownership based on use and occupancy, and without absentee abusus aka "private" ownership like shares.
A possible interpretation and use of 'stake' in libertarian socialist models could start from stake of voting tokens in tokenized blockchain based co-ops, for example how a global UBI system co-op style could start imagining and organizing its self-governance model(s). UBI co-op where "money", ie tokens for variety of uses, would be created directly as gifts for the owners, ie. co-op members. Ie., what could be the technical meaning of stake, when money creation and distribution is socially owned?
You joking? China got so powerful BECAUSE Deng's liberal reforms made it capitalist.
@Tom Nicholas Sorry but the intent to justify your add is disingenuous to say the least. Who's paying for your video? Surfshark. The main purpose of your video is to sell us "Surfshark". When TV channels (even the public ones) make an add placement for Coca-Cola or Hasbro in the middle of a show, who's in charge of the show? The capital behind it. You may agree with Coca-Cola and try to defend it, but it doesn't change the nature of the relationship.
And yes, I get it, this is capitalism and we all need to eat, but it's also true you could fully finance your channel via Patron like many others do. It's a pity because your argument loses so much power against Harris. A small add like yours it's OK, but a big one is not.
Cheers and thanks for the videos.
Can't wait to hear Harris' response to this brilliant analysis, I want the drama
Omg the 2 smart kids in class arguing
We all do¡
I cannot imagine this video will get quite that much traction, but I would be totally up for a non-confrontational chat where we talk it through a bit, haha! (Although I can imagine there was possibly (not saying definitely) some form of NDA involved).
@@insidethebox2470 lmfao, Harris isn't very intelligent
He's not going to respond just as he won't update anything about the case of navalnyi where he was fangirling so hard on him when hes even called "russian trump" for his ultra-nationalist anti-immigrant pro gun views that please the us overlords
I appreciate you filling in, Tom. Thank you
Great video Tom, very well articulated and on point. Keep up the good work. Peace
"We know the problem is capitalism, the obvious solution is capitalism."
Use the stones to destroy the stones.
Faster, stronger, more resilient capitalism.
Put different types of capitalism in hadron colliders and keep the only surviving one. Send it back to political scientists to study and make stronger, bigger forms of capitalism.
Actually, probably, yes
@@l.pietrobon3925 Imagine if we have advanced computers to test out more efficient and profitable strains of capitalism.
I remember that video striking me the wrong way especially when he stops talking about China
The mention of the World Economic Furum only makes it worse. As a Swiss guy, I never liked the idea that we basically gift a village to an international organization to host the global elite so that these guys can fulfil their yearly quota of pretending to care
I hope people see it as the scam it really is. Global Elites promoting public ownership? I am not a fool.
ua-cam.com/video/Dum0bqWfiGw/v-deo.html
your country is sadly a place where all the rich corrupt people of the world store all of their wealth.
your position as a neutral country is in fact a very dangerous and weak policy.
@@LevisH21 You dont know anything about his country, watching vox doesn't mean anything. Its really not as bad as you have been led to believe
@@dopaminedreams1122 not bad for the average Swiss citizen, maybe but the people that have their money stolen from corrupt countries around the world have their stolen money hidden in secret bank accounts by corrupt politicians.
After 2 years its even worse
Having seen Harris’s videos on China, Qatar’s World Cup, WEF & many others I confirm that his channel is well-crafted propaganda machine
Ngl you were alot more generous to Harris then I would've been. The whole "a text version of this was listed on their website where he wasn't even the primary author" was just SO shady
This is called peer review, well done! honestly going through your videos all of them are nicely worked and researched. More like these are needed.
he has his own hidden agenda and sometimes it's too obvious. and sometimes I feel his confirmation bias is too strong he research in order to conform his opinions...
@Lukas Prochazka tru but it’s kind of impossible to not have bias as a human. I like Tom because he’s open about this bias and doesn’t pretend to be “neutral”(whatever that means), but critical and methodical
@@kofi9212 He says the World Economic Forum isn't involved in a conspiracy. But he has no evidence. Conspiracies aren't meant to be easily uncovered. Corporations are currently overhauling society without most of the public's knowledge.
@@tuckerbugeater one reason WEF is not involved in a conspiracy is because it doesn't need to be, and this is usually why many supposed conspiracies are actually nonexistent. No actual conspiracy could have more influence than the WEF has in its current form. Likewise, you don't need a conspiracy to turn billions of people into Facebook or videogame playing morons (talking about the addicts who have no life except play violent video games). People sign up to that shit willingly, with all the cards on the table, no-one's deceiving or forcing them.
Sis was drag by her thin receding hairline
hey just letting you know i really appreciate the English caption effort! there's a transcription error at 0:30 where "rising stars of 2020" is shown as "rising stars of the past 12 months", just letting you know so that you or whoever is responsible for the captions might be able to fix that :)
Had to revisit this after Johnny's abhorrent journalistic malpractice of his most recent video. Should have known better that an ex-Mormon could be so easily duped after listening to some old podcasts.
What was the video?
If he doesn't talk about this partnership at the beginning this may actually be a crime
That's an interesting question because I don't know whether those laws only apply to selling products or services. Whilst there's shout out for the book, there's not really anything in particular being sold here. But there's not been the "Contains ads" or whatever flag anytime I've watched it and I watched it a whole bunch whilst making this video.
@@Tom_Nicholas Yes if he received ANYTHING of value which doesn't even have to be monetary (ie. free travel) it is a crime. In the US it needs to be clearly stated that they are a sponsor and marked as such.
@@excitedbox5705 does this apply to NGOs? Like if the WEF technically doesn't make a profit, does the law still stand?
@@james_chatman disclosures by law have to be clearly laid out to viewers (ex. in the video title or at the beginning of the video), or it is a violation of the rules regarding sponsorships. seeing how he squirreled the disclosure away just before the end of the video, lots of folks watched the bulk of the video but left before the disclosure. if it isn't currently illegal, it's incredibly unethical and ought to be illegal.
@@daddishowkey The law stands for everybody. No exceptions. However, I have no idea if it is legal or illegal
I have always had deep issues with Johnny Harris' content, which aside from coming across as pretentious and self-serious, is usually a lot of fluff and snappy editing, visuals and storytelling to hide an otherwise hollow or weakly researched core. He clearly has a talent for making interesting videos on engaging topics, but I have never been able to shake an uncomfortable feeling about his content and persona.
One of his most egregious examples is his video on language learning where, surprise surprise, he reveals at the end he's selling a language learning course, goes on and on about a non-traditional language learning model with fancy graphics without really saying anything at all, and boasts about his rapid learning of Italian in the span of a few months while brushing over his prior fluency in Spanish which possesses a massive overlap in vocabulary and grammatical structure. It's overall just dishonest and leaves a bad taste in one's mouth when all of this is dangled as implied promises of rapid learning should one subscribe to his course.
I saw the McDonald's icecream one. It was 5min of content stretched over 30min of "storytelling".
I got about 10min in before I realised he was never actually going to get to the point. Haven't been able to stomach anything with his face on since.
Does he have real talent for making interesting videos...? Or does he have the ability to fund & manage a team that otherwise brings together interesting videos on engaging topics...? Also, I agree - his language learning video falls flat as a blatant advert for his language learning course.
the dude is full blown woke while pretending to defend the poor yet ironically makes millions, eats avocado toast, and drinks fancy artisan ice cream like Pelosi lol. Similar to the woke hipster tech folks in SF that no longer show up to the office to contend to the walking dead homeless there lol
@@mabamabam I swear it's just so punchable. You could see through his slyness just watching a few videos.
Harris is a scammer…can’t stand this clown
Just saw this on the Hasabi stream and had to give you a like and follow. Amazing vid!!
lol the irony… Hasan is far worse in his misinformation than Harris is
Refreshing to see really informative unbiased in-depth content on youtube nowadays Keep up the great work!
I only accept youtubers having sponsors when I can easily understand how the company would benefit from the sponsor. Raid Shadow Legends isn't looking to seed the web with propoganda and cause a shift in global thinking, it just wants more players.
Or at the very least when they have the decency to disclose it at the beginning, not push it off to the very end.
No, it's propaganda is wanting you to think it's any good
And definitely will be more skeptical about the product presented by UA-camr.
@@MariaThePotterNut that is just marketing. propaganda is inherently political.
@Shea Martin raid shadow legends is just a cash grab game, good business model bad game
Propaganda is the right word for it. In his political vidoes Harris takes an idea an works backwards to prove his point, disregarding data that does not prove his point. Did not know about the magnitude this. He is entertaining but not informing.
Thanks for your time to look behind this!
This dude ain’t one bit better. Explaining the WEF like it’s just some evil rich dudes ruining the world while pretending to want to do something. Some may actually not want to change but why do we always have to assume the worst in people?
Yes, I've seen this as well. When you keep this kind of thing in mind and go back to his videos it becomes very clear.
Not to mention the inappropriate ommition of important information he does.
You don't even know the definition of propaganda...using logic/facts to support an argument is not "propaganda" just because you disregard data that does not support your point. That is just having bias. With your logic, everything is propaganda including your comment.
The amount of cynicism and hypocrisy in this video would amaze me if I wasn't used to leftists but very nice to see two leftist sc. ms eating each other. It's very enjoyable to see that they believe exactly the same thing but this round guy attacks the other to prove he's more communist and truly believes that B's. Looks like an internal dispute in the communist party in the USSR. "You're not commie enough". 👏🏻🤡🥳😂💩😂🤪
I was thinking about nebula when watching this video and figured out you’re on it! That’s honestly so cool :D
I’ll remember to check out your vide on nebula first next time :)
Surely this can’t be the WORST possible timeline, considering Tom is making videos like this! Great job.
this argument is exactly the same as "nooooo it's not capitalism that's the problem, it's _crony_ capitalism"
And yet they make fun of socialists who say 'it wasn't real communism'
Except capitalism usually creates a few outrageously rich people, who can then buy off the government. The whole system tends towards oligarchy.
...I mean, can you think of any democracy in which rich people don't have more pull than regular people? Maybe there is one?
@@grmpEqweer isn’t Cuba democratic?
@@xenoblad Not even close. It's an authoritarian one-party state that greatly restricts freedoms and civil liberties and kills dissidents.
Absolutely outstanding work Tom
Real recognise real
Fancy seeing you here doc!
Hi doc👋🏼
I wish I could have your opinion on every video about important topics that I watch 😅
Thank you! Haha, if we ever go on a holiday that involves a plane, I always tell my partner (who's a doctor) about your incredible luck with having medical emergencies on flights. I don't think she appreciates it very much...
The way you slow motion the very end your phrasing before a cut makes me think of a narrow flashlight, or "torch", sweeping down the length of a dank warehouse cast in abyssal darkness. And I say that with fondness :D
Great video! So far you seem like a great journalist, the exact type of journalist the world needs more of right now. Subscribed!
While I love that this video exists and admittedly wish Johnny had been more transparent, I feel this is perfectly in character with how traditional journalism works. Perfectly reputable newspapers frequently run stories that are sponsored by NGOs, governments, and businesses. The UK government recently ran such articles across numerous papers about Brexit's "positive" impact. This video stuck out as incredibly uncharacteristic to Harris's channel because we're not used to it in video format but isn't unusal to any involved in journalism for a significant length of time.
Great video and thanks so much for bringing this to a larger audience. I don't think enough people pay attention to just how much media is influenced by third parties beyond the outlets biases
Yeah, this happens occasionally in print media and it's bad there too. It's much less common though and the statements of corporate/government involvement are much more present.
Shoutout to Halim Alrah's manufacturing consent video (I assume everyond here knows of Tom's)
You said "perfectly reputable newspapers" which is a framing people need to change. Those papers fofeited their good reputations & trustworthiness some time ago. A lot of our difficulities come from people continuing to pretend or ignore. We have to move on & find solutions or we're effed!
@@kenechiachusiogu1717 yeah same here
@ᴡɪɴᴛᴇʀᴍᴜᴛᴇ _ It's true parasocial relationships are a concern, especially with the likes of Musk, as you say, however I think this is rather mean of you & overreaching, using first name does not always imply that there's an over identification with a stranger. Maybe take the cork out of your arse fella. Have a nice weekend.
I'm a huge fan of Johnny Harris, but the fact that he didn't know to immediately to stay the hell away from having a relationship with the WEF and Klaus Schwab to the point to produce a video in partnership with them is highly alarming and mind boggling
He believes in it.
What is more alarming is the number of people who consider Schwab and co. to be capitalists rather than communists wearing a cloak.
"Stakeholder Capitalism" isn't capitalism at all!
Money, plain and simple!
@@Radeo What utter nonsense. WEF is the epitome of capitalism.
@@XMysticHerox Perhaps the poster above meant 'communism as observed in real life' rather than 'communism as written on paper', alas. Being from a former communist country, there's definitely some merit to that, but I think it's ultimately a pointless distinction once you get into the reality of elites - it doesn't matter if they spout platitudes about the free market or about diveristy and equality, it's all just a cover that they believe is the best way to covertly reach their goal (and make you believe it's what you wanted), which is simply to hold all the power. They corrupted capitalism (as you can see now) exactly like they corrupted communism (as you can see historically), all to keep power in a small closed circle. And the more powerful the government, the easier that is.
He pitched the concept to the WEF
Say no more
Tom mate, thanks for your work!
You have one of the most important YT channels right now IMO, people need to hear this, and it's great that someone like you can articulate & present it in such a accessible manner!
The viewership & subscriber count is going up, so I hope it makes a difference.
Greetings from Serbia, wish you all the best!
When I watched Jonny's video I felt he was being held at gunpoint to say that.
Haha.
Haha.
Haha.
Haha.
Only if the gun in cuestion shoots cash
I resisted this video at first, mostly cause I thought it was click bait to boost your channel but i’m actually so glad I watched it. Such valid and thoughtful critique of someone with a large influential platform. So often we assume independent journalists to be the pinnacle of Ethics and Neutrality but we have to keep them honest too. who knows what they’ll do to pay the bills
and now he works at NYT
@@CarloBarlongo mainstream media???🤢🤮🤢🤮🤢🤮🤢🤮🤢🤮🤢🤮🤢🤮🤢🤮🤢🤮🤢🤮🤢🤮🤢🤮🤢🤮🤢🤮🤢🤮🤢🤮🤢🤮🤢🤮🤢🤮🤢🤮🤢🤮🤢🤮
Now we need someone keeping this guy honest
Our good sis Harris was dragged by her thin receding hairline, we love yt on yt crimez. Yet sooo civil but yet sooo Savage
He's not an independent journalist (anymore).
and now we have @johnnyharris doing a video about corruption within FIFA when the video is being sponsored by Established Titiles which is being investigated by the Advertising Standards Authority in the UK for being a SCAM. Kind of ironic really.....
This video is so much longer than it needs to be.
I hope Johnny makes a response video about his thought process with accepting that one.
I can't quite imagine this video getting enough views for that to happen. Would love to do a little interview though, haha!
@@Tom_Nicholas Oh i'm sure he keeps enough of an eye on his analytics to see when his name is mentioned
@@Tom_Nicholas bumping up the algorithm for you bro, you make great content
@@Tom_Nicholas liking and subscribing to your channel for better traction
Interestingly enough, he's replied in a pinned comment to this video already.
I've always had a love-hate relationship with his videos. He's a great story teller - but sometimes oversimplifies certain topics to the extent of being misleading - his New York video being a great example and some of his recent Cyprus ones. The shame is - one or two incorrect facts in his video can ruin the whole thing - to the extent you feel you can't trust it or him at all. Yes people make mistakes, but when they are made regularly you kinda stop giving benefit of the doubt.
Owning up to mistakes you make is a big part of becoming better... sadly seems Harris isn't too interested in that...
His astrophotography video about photographing a galaxy is the same way. It is the one that jumps out to me as I have quite a bit of experience with the topic.
He tells a great story but it's clearly pushed to the max and very misleading. He leaves out a lot of the process to make it seem a lot harder than it is.
His videos are so well produced but I'm now seeing there is a lot beneath the surface
@@KnowledgePerformance7 Honest question, how exactly is it misleading? I watched that video a month or so ago, but if I recall correctly, one of the driving points of the video was how incredibly difficult it was to gain this skill. Isn't that the whole point of the "foggy valley" analogy? The video wasn't a tutorial, it was an exploration his new hobby.
@@kcwidman I like his analogy, I just think the story is blown way out of proportion.
Now there isn't necessarily a problem with that, it makes for better story telling, but it felt kinda wrong to me? Not sure how to nail how I feel about it.
@@KnowledgePerformance7 Kurzgesagt made an excellent video about that
Still my favourite video Tom, you are incredible.
Great video, but my only critique is the audio levels. They go from quiet to quieter. Look into using a compression filter over the audio to give it a more consistent audio level
Well dang. I watched that video on China and rolled my eyes at the stakeholder capitalism thing, but I clicked the video off before the whole partnership with the world economic forum thing. I had no idea I was just watching an ad. I just thought it was a bit of a dimwitted video on an otherwise good channel. Is it even legal to not disclose that kind of thing?
I mean, I don't think putting that bit at the end was a mistake...
@@Tom_Nicholas Yeah no, I don't think it was a mistake either. I'm just a bit shocked and pissed I guess.
@@Tom_Nicholas I'm not sure how to interpret this.
Mistake as "unintentional", or mistake as "a bad thing to do"?
I guess it's probably the former.
@@NawidN did your parents teach you that a mistake was a bad thing to do? It's ok to make mistakes.
@@Tom_Nicholas It's not, it's what gives videos views on UA-cam. You should know, as a creator here, that UA-cam specifically provides data that proves videos lose viewers if ads are placed at the beginning. It's the reason you did a one frame shout out to Surfshark (or whatever it was) at the beginning and didn't run the ad until later.
Tom:
"Things get weird when he starts talking about stakeholder capitalism"
me with a bachelors degree in management where all we ever did was talk about stakeholder theory:
*sweating*
@T Wilson the problem isn't with the idea itself, but the fact that a organisation closely linked to the super wealthy is advocating for it. This gives the impression that no real change will occur other than a "re-branding" that does nothing to fix the issues that exist
How does it work, if you can do an ELI5 of it? All my versions of it work out as either:
* You get (tiny) shares in a company in lieu of money
* Company becomes owned by its worker
* State, counter, town etc owns (or enough shares to decide policy of) any company where the population has an interest.
Same I did a bachelors in accounting. I was like "Wait what?"
@BTAX So they spent a significant amount of time brainwashing students into believing Socialism was a better form of Capitalism just using another name? Great...
@@vincentmuyo Marx had the idea that shareholder capitalism would work out like stakeholder capitalism, and was a path to true worker-owner socialism. There's nothing that prevents the wealthy from accumulating the majority of shares the same way they accumulate them now, and that's precisely why stakeholder capitalism is just a nice theory. As long as workers lack the capital to reinvest, they can never own a collective majority of their own companies. Co-ops and worker owned companies in general usually start out that way, so that outside investors don't have the opportunity to buy it out from under them. Then again that's also why there are so few of them. Even Mondragon Corp now has facilities in China, do those workers own those facilities? I can't find anything on Mondragon's site that proves one way or the other, but it seems like it would be a shady legal arrangement if they did. China's not fond of foreign ownership of their stuff.
Thank you for exposing this! Keep it up!
Wow, I remember watching Johnny Harris’s video about China, but I never realized it was co-produced with the World Economic Forum, even though he mentioned it at the end. I was so caught up in the video that I probably missed this detail until you pointed it out. If I knew it was inspired or sponsored by the World Economic Forum, I would have had a very different viewpoint on it. Thank you again; we have to be very careful about what we watch and believe, as there’s always another side to the picture.
Long-time fan. The Stakeholder Capitalism argument (at least without human rights reform) is the economic equivalent of 1st class passengers of the Titanic deciding they may as well grab buckets and start bailing water out an hour after the ship hit the glacier, and 12 seconds before their privilege allows them to hop into the lifeboat before everyone else.
Stakeholder capitalism sounds like actual fascism.
Stakeholder capitalism is the same as crony capitalism and corporatism.
Just a deflection to take peoples minds of the fact that its all just capitalism. "No, capitalism can't be wrong! It's the people who implemented it in some wrong way!".
This!!!
Doesn’t matter about “human rights reform” because globalist corporations will be the ones to decide what the reforms are.
@@chriswhite3692 stakeholder capitalism is fascism…and cementing neo-feudalism.
I swear I thought I was clicking on a Johnny video, well played British man.
He definitely did that on purpose haha. Draws a lot of clicks.
Huh. I was dismissing the video for two days thinking it's Johnny's. :)
Yeah, I had watched the video and just felt that something was off halfway through the video, when he mentioned the sponsorship at the end of the video, it finally clicked in my mind what was going on
excellent video! i do think it’s important tho to point out that any bit of art that is designed to influence people could be considered propaganda. this could be considered propaganda, advertisements are propaganda and even artworks made by individuals with a motive could be propaganda. not all propaganda is bad, depending on what kinds of views you have on a subject
After watching this, I can't stop wondering about the role of UA-cam as a platform, which is owned by a large corporate and the whole advertisement model is boosted by many other corporations. I won't be surprised, if youtube algorithm starts recommending every one 'pro capitalism' content at some point.
@@pirateKaiser True. He's one of the few channels I'm subbed with notifications, and I still don't get them properly.
Have you seen how hard the algorithm pushes you into a pit of propaganda just by watching a certain type of content? Watch videos about guns, and soon enough right-wing lunatics are gonna be yelling about Kamala Harris the communist coming to take your toothbrush away.
Reason why The Grayzone and Empire Files won't show up in your recommendations.
@@pirateKaiser Sometimes you can't even find his videos when you search for the title
I prefer to watch it on Nebula because that at least gets the poor guy paid for his work
He has also had people from the US government show up at his door apparently, which is just scary
You think UA-cam, Twitter, Instagram and Google are pro capitalism? The platforms that are literally pushing antifa and blocking anyone who complains?
I'm a Chinese. I first saw that 'How China became powerful' video a long time ago and thought of it just another generic China smearing video and didn't take him seriously. Then some time later, UA-cam's algorithm recommended me his supposedly educational video about how the Chinese language is typed on computer/phone. I was shocked by the amount of misinformation in the video! He started the video by making a connection between the modern Chinese language input system with Mao's communist policy half a century ago (and quoting fundamentally wrong information). He also implied that China is using this mysteriously advanced and evil language input system to outcompete the West on technologies by throwing in lots of emotionally disturbing graphics and sound effects. I thought this was the most stupid, nonsense and blatant propaganda I've ever seen, yet in the comment section everyone was praising him for revealing the grand scheme behind the Chinese input system. This is how I remembered this guy.
I thought UA-cam is banned in china, ofcourse if you living there.
@@ajaxjaiswal3442 He said he was Chinese. He didn't say he was living there.
Yeah he's a blatant journalist, and for me journalist are not better than unemployed, heck even unemployed are being insulted by being compared to him
@@ajaxjaiswal3442 UA-cam is not banned _to watch_, it's just not allowed to operate in China, for the same reason you can't use a lot of US websites in Europe - failure to adhere to web privacy regulations. Many people in China use VPNs to acess these websites.
Though, when it comes to youtube, not many people feel the need to, because there are Chinese video websites that they prefer - one result of these restrictions has been that China is one of the only countries who actually has its own large web industry, instead of just being steamrolled by US giants as has happened everywhere else.
@@sotch2271 where do you get your news from? Twitter or what? Haha
It’s pretty funny being recommended this video after watching Johnny Harris’s recent super misleading Joe Rogan video
same
Here after Johnny praised Joe Rogan, this video aged beautifully
I mean, I love Johnny Harris to death, but he does get a bit too capitalist-y for me every now and then. The way he threw socialism under the bus in the China video certainly annoyed me. Also, I was not aware of the WEF sponsor, and that does make me rather uncomfortable.
Yeah, I thought the weird feeling I got from that video was an ideological disconnect, but I guess it was a bit more than that. I saw the part about the WEF sponsorship, but I guess it never really sank in. Sucks too, because Johnny Harris is one of my handful of favorite creators on the platform..
what about the cuba video? another video he blamed socialism and was pro capitalism
Fuc socialism lol no country uses it
To be honest, China cannot be consider Socialist or communist in any form now, it is hybrid
@@simulify8726 Hardly hybrid-it's authoritarian/state capitalist. If the working class doesn't have democratic control of the means of production (which they don't), it's neither socialist or communist.
The moment I saw “World Economic Forum” I screamed “oh nooooo it’s DAVOS!” and woke up my dog from his nap. Fantastic video.
🤣
Would love to see a similar take on Jake Tran. Also, the way you speak is absolutely captivating and interesting! Love it.
I had no idea. Thank you for this, Tom.
I'm not realy understand about this stakeholder company thingy, but...
In my country Indonesia, we have one type of company that is called "Koperasi" taken from word "Cooperation".
In this type of company, there is no single owner who own the company. Anyone who became member to the company, either their position is a manager, accountant, security, or janitor, as long as that person is registered as member of the company, that person have rights to some of the company's net profit that is calculated from their activeness in the company.
The company it self can run a bussiness in form.of grocery shop chain, community bank, farming shop, local transportations and such.
In every scheduled time, all member of the company will gather together in a meeting to talk about their company's strategy and also talking about share of profit. Some company do this meeting once every 6 months, some other do it once every year.
This type of company lead by a group of people that is part of the comitee who's duty is to lead the company. They are choosen by all of members democraticaly
Koperasi has been something like a saviour to indonesian community, since lots of people join koperasi to increase their income.
After 1998 asian economy crisis, koperasi even became the backbone of indonesian rural economy that contributed to hold the country from being colapsing, due to it's principle of
"From the members, by the members and for the members"
This one's for the algorithm
The algorithm (and I) thank you!
Bump bump it up!!
thanks for making a video about this. that whole "shareholder capitalism" and "stakeholder capitalism" stuff is so ridiculous. he sounds like those people who say that corporatism or cronies are the real villains but capitalism is fine. I'm still subscribed to the guy cause i like learning different points of view but it's troubling that he's influencing people. there is also some nonsense called 'conscious capitalism' if you want to explore that
Yeah, I really like a whole bunch of his stuff, but this was just eeeeeesh. I'm trying to square it by putting it down to naivety...
Also, when he mention Milton Friedman just to praise him, that was a red flag for me, I feel like every time people bring Friedman they should also mention the role he played during the Reagan administration and what he did in Chile. That guy has blood in his hands
Capitalism is infinitely more ethical than the alternatives.
@@Deathmastertx i bet you couldn’t describe the alternative even i press you to do it
@@Deathmastertx idk im pretty sure the system that is leading to total ecological collapse isnt the most ethical one of all the potential options.
I have been ignoring this video for 4 months and i finally gave up and now I'm watching this video...😅
Thanks for this piece. A new sub here.
i just bumped into this video and it reminded me of one of Vsauce’s new videos where he talks about how a technocracy is the solution to beat the Great Filter. The video was sponsored by the Bill and Melinda Gates Foundation - super weird to see.
well i mean, bias aside, how would we become a type 1+ civilization without the tech for it?
Saw that too, immediately clicked off after I saw it was sponsored by them
@sketroux tech vs technocracy. The solution is divorcing technology from oligarchical economic rule, unshackling it from private property/capitalism
@Aditya Chavarkar don't wanna listen to propoganda from billionaires
@@paddyodoor3090 Why do you assume, that anything said by billionaires is either
1) Biased, misleading or misinforming
or
2) Conceived of from a political standpoint
This is one of the reasons I love Zizek's work for: "According to our common sense, we think that ideology is something blurring, confusing our straight view. Ideology should be glasses, which distort our view, and the critique of ideology should be the opposite like you take off the glasses so that you can finally see the way things really are. [..] [T]his precisely is the ultimate illusion: ideology is not simply imposed on ourselves. Ideology is our spontaneous relation to our social world, how we perceive each meaning and so on and so on. We, in a way, enjoy our ideology." (A pervert's guide to ideology)
Thank you for putting this here! You gotta love Zizek. (And so on you know *sniff*)
@@patrickgallagher1161 I read the whole comment in my head, in Zizek's sniffing voice. It is so freaking funny to read it like that.
@yourgardengem something like: ideological viewpoint is not one where there is a filter between you and what you're looking /analysing. As if removing that 'ideological barrier' will give you 'pure, real truth'. The first 'natural', 'common sense' viewpoint you get when looking /studying something IS the ideological viewpoint. I understand it as: work is not done to impose the ideology. That state is the 'already here'. Work must be done to remove the ideology.
I think this explains a lot how the 'but capitalism is the only one which works in real life' argument which even ppl who never bothered about history, politics, and economics so easily and confidently spit out.
Im not sure though, I never read Zizek 👀
@yourgardengem The thing that you should keep in your mind when reading Zizek is that he has a habit to contradict himself. For example- Let's say that he says "This is X" and just after that he is gonna say "This is not X" and then he is gonna form an opinion or he may not do it.
@@thefausty5195 basically this. lol
27:17 Damn that sums up the video there, thank you so much for helping me realize this man.
Only just got served this by youtube. Brilliant video. Subbed.
Thanks for watching! Support the channel whilst getting Early Access to videos, copies of the scripts, access to exclusive commentary tracks and more by heading to patreon.com/tomnicholas
Your channel is spectacular, I really enjoy your ability to convey complex ideas, while having a great sense of humor
DUDE, I had to unsub from him when he mentioned the wef, and he went off on someone in the comments of his community tab post. He broke character so bad that it shattered the illusion for me. I'm officially subbed to you now. IDK why I never subbed before I've seen a majority of your videos but never realized I hadn't subbed. Either that or I was unsubbed at some point :/
@@privateemail9755 damn, I'm glad I never followed him, and the great all knowing algorithm never led me to him, after vox borders..
I dont know about you, but it's so much more reprehensible to pretend to believe in better things, to only enrich yourself and loving terrible things is sooo much worse than just openly being pro evil.
@Hakan hasşerbetçi your not wrong, some skepticism is always healthy, and if someone is making money off of what they sau, their motives should be seen as suspect. Some do the best they can to do good in the world we live in, but the line between that and gritting, is so thin, often its onu known by the person doing it at the time
@Erwin Lii Chomsky isn't a journalist, but he's right 99% of the time and has written about world politics for years.
I don't know, I don't even feel like the China video was meant for anything else except selling people the WEF's ideology. The video didn't even have the same structure or thoughtful presentation you'd expect of his better videos
Well, that's kind of the point I guess.
China is evil
Great job mate, as french i used to listen to him but i see now the few things who did bother me. Thank you.
Awesome, this is the 3rd video youtuber Ive seen debunking Johnny Harris! Well Done!
Until major corporations and banks start paying their employees a living wage, I couldn't care less about any of their so-called "initiatives".
Indeed and yet they still manage to pool half a billion US dollars annually into this lobbying group to resist meaningful change from the public.
Most businesses call this an outlay, they're not pumping this money into this advocacy if did it didn't leave them at least a penny better off and they're not in it for the pennies.
@@giansideros 100%
ua-cam.com/video/Dum0bqWfiGw/v-deo.html
God this video pisses me off it's so disingenuous.
I disagree with Johnny w.r.t. The Great Reset. They plan to change things radically.
Honestly this is such a required video. I feel UA-cam is the last front for those seeking journalism of unbiased truth. If we're not too careful we'll not even realise the descend of UA-cam in the same pit as cable news because we'd be going down with it. Subbed!
UA-cam is blocking most criticism of the WEF.
Throughout history, the instances of truly unbiased journalism are few and far between. There is always an agenda in the mind of the supposed journalist. This is more evident today than any time I can recall in the last 50 years. However, it is certainly not new. One need only review newspaper articles going back to the beginning of the printing press. There is a part of me that almost admires the ability of two opposing views to use actual facts to promote an agenda and 'prove' their opposition wrong. To me, Johnny Harris and Tom Nichols are two sides of the same coin. I don't believe either is a liar, nor do I believe they are not sincere in their respective beliefs. They have opinions which are largely subjective and are each accomplished wordsmiths in presenting those opinions to influence others into their way of thinking. However, in concert with that, they both utilize forums that exist solely through money and the ability to generate money to keep it going.
I say the cable news of the pre-social media era was pretty unbiased.
@@foscorsohil8940 you mean the news that told you capitalism good communism bad?
@@vuvuzela691 there was no such news. News used to be pretty boring in those times, thus less manipulated.
The fact that he works with The World Economic Forum summarizes it all.
Who do you recommend for unbiased easy to access journalism?